pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23506 · v1 · pith:HVOTTZ7Gnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

On the treatment of topology changes on 3D polyhedral moving meshes via 4D space-time hole-like elements in direct ALE ADER-DG methods

Elena Gaburro , Matej Klima , Mauro Bonafini , Maurizio Tavelli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords direct ALEADER-DGtopology changesspace-time elementsmoving mesheshyperbolic PDEsconservation lawsDelaunay flips
0
0 comments X

The pith

Direct ALE ADER-DG schemes handle 3D mesh topology changes via 4D hole-like elements while preserving conservation and order.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian discontinuous Galerkin scheme that evolves hyperbolic PDEs over space-time volumes connecting successive moving meshes. When the mesh undergoes topology changes such as edge flips, gaps appear in the space-time domain that are filled by introducing additional degenerate elements with zero volume at the time endpoints but positive four-dimensional measure. This construction allows the scheme to handle frequent changes in mesh connectivity while avoiding projection steps or mesh intersections. Numerical experiments confirm that conservation, the geometric conservation law, and the design order of accuracy are maintained. The approach is particularly relevant for simulations involving deforming domains where remeshing is necessary.

Core claim

By defining hole-like 4D space-time elements that connect elements with different neighborhoods due to 2-3, 3-2, and 4-4 flips on a Delaunay tetrahedralization, the method integrates the PDE over space-time control volumes that accommodate topology changes. These elements have zero three-dimensional volume at both the initial and final times but a strictly positive four-dimensional volume, enabling a consistent high-order evolution without complex remapping techniques.

What carries the argument

Hole-like 4D elements: degenerate space-time volumes with zero 3D volume at both ends of the time interval but positive 4D measure, inserted to fill gaps arising from topology changes in the underlying 3D mesh.

If this is right

  • The numerical scheme remains fully conservative across topology changes.
  • The geometric conservation law is satisfied on the evolving meshes.
  • The method maintains its designed order of convergence in the presence of frequent topology changes.
  • No projection-reconstruction or mesh intersection operations are required between time levels.
  • The construction applies directly to 2-3, 3-2, and 4-4 flips on Delaunay tetrahedralizations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Analogous degenerate space-time fillers could be constructed for other classes of topology transitions beyond the three flips treated here.
  • The same space-time connection strategy might reduce implementation cost when coupling the scheme to adaptive mesh refinement algorithms.
  • The explicit geometric description of the 4D volumes supplies a template that other high-order space-time methods could reuse for arbitrary polyhedral meshes.
  • Visualization techniques introduced for these elements may help diagnose conservation errors in any 4D space-time discretization that permits mesh reconfiguration.

Load-bearing premise

The geometric construction and quadrature rules for the hole-like 4D elements can be defined and integrated without introducing conservation errors or order reduction for the listed flips on Delaunay tetrahedralizations.

What would settle it

A simulation run with repeated 2-3 and 3-2 flips in which either total conserved quantities deviate from the reference value beyond truncation error or the observed convergence rate falls below the theoretical order for the chosen polynomial degree.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23506 by Elena Gaburro, Matej Klima, Maurizio Tavelli, Mauro Bonafini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: From left to right, top to bottom. We cover our domain with a set of generator points (orange) and we connect them via a tetrahedralization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: In this figure, we depict the portion of tetrahedralization (left) where a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In this figure, we depict the portion of tetrahedralization (left) where a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In this image we present an example of the sequence of elementary operations needed to perform a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: In this figure, we depict in blue the concept of the 4D space-time control volume [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mapping of a space-time lateral surface ∂C n i j (left) to a reference element composed of a triangle Tˆ extruded in time over [0, 1] (right). a triangular facet of P n i at time t n , while the "top base" coincides with the corresponding facet at time t n+1 and the "height" is given by ∆t. The lateral faces of these prisms are generally not planar; they possess a curvature that requires a more sophisticat… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: In this figure, we depict the concept of the 4D [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: In this figure, we provide three additional di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: In this figure, the 4D hole-like element H n i corresponding to a 4-4 flip is depicted as a pink space-time slab, along with five time snapshots of the element between t n and t n+1 . At each fixed instant, the hole-like element has the shape of a parallelepiped, displayed in solid black lines; this element is thus delimited at each instant by 8 vertices with space-time coordinates. Additionally 4 of its 6… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: In this figure, we provide additional visualization strategies for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Connectivity configurations of the diamond region of the tetrahedralization corresponding to elementary flips. The left side of the figure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The left part of this figure shows the minimal computational polyhedral mesh corresponding to a 3-2 flip, before (first image) and after [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Rotating sphere test case. We show here the cutout of the initial tetrahedral mesh (left) with the elements having [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Rotating sphere test case. In this figure we highlight, maintaining the same color map of the previous Figure 13 the elements associated to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: In this figure, we report a three-dimensional view of the Shu vortex simulation obtained with our ALE ADER-DG method with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This work investigates a novel approach for the high order evolution of hyperbolic PDEs using ADER discontinuous Galerkin schemes within a direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE) framework on 3D moving polyhedral meshes with topology changes. Our direct ALE method is based on the PDE integration over 4D (3D+time) space-time control volumes connecting the elements of two subsequent tessellations, so to simultaneously evolve the solution both in time and between the two different meshes in an effective and high order manner. In this way, we also avoid any complex and expensive projection-reconstruction techniques and any mesh intersection operation typical of indirect ALE schemes. The crucial step consists in the strategy for building space-time control volumes that also connect elements with different shapes and neighborhoods due to a change in topology. In fact, simply linking existing elements by collapsing or expanding their edges would leave a "hole" in the space-time domain. To fill it, we introduce additional degenerate elements that we call hole-like elements. These are 4D objects with zero 3D volume at both the beginning and end of the timestep, but which possess a strictly non-zero 4D space-time volume. Given the uniqueness of this space-time approach in 3D+time and the necessity of characterizing the geometry of such elements, the main objective of this paper is the formal geometrical and numerical description of the method as well as the presentation of new and intuitive visualization strategies. In particular, we provide a detailed characterization of the hole-like elements arising in correspondence to 2-3, 3-2, and 4-4 flips on the underlying Delaunay tetrahedralization. Finally, we numerically show that the method is fully conservative, satisfies the GCL and maintains the correct order of convergence even in the presence of frequent topology changes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a direct ALE ADER discontinuous Galerkin method for 3D hyperbolic PDEs on polyhedral moving meshes that undergo topology changes. Space-time control volumes are constructed by connecting elements across timesteps; for 2-3, 3-2 and 4-4 flips on Delaunay tetrahedralizations, additional degenerate 4D 'hole-like' elements (zero 3D volume at both temporal endpoints but positive 4D measure) are introduced to fill gaps. The authors supply a geometric characterization of these elements together with visualization techniques and report numerical experiments asserting that the resulting scheme remains fully conservative, satisfies the geometric conservation law, and retains its design order of accuracy.

Significance. If the quadrature rules on the hole-like elements can be shown to be algebraically consistent with the space-time divergence theorem, the approach would remove the need for projection or intersection operations in direct ALE schemes while handling topology changes at high order. The explicit construction for the listed Delaunay flips and the new visualization strategies constitute concrete technical contributions to the literature on arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian methods.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical results] Numerical verification section: the claims of exact conservation, GCL satisfaction and order preservation are stated without accompanying quantitative tables (e.g., global conservation errors, GCL violation norms, or L2 error tables versus polynomial degree both with and without topology changes). This absence prevents assessment of whether the hole-like element quadrature introduces any residual that would violate the central assertions.
  2. [Geometric construction of hole-like elements] Section describing the quadrature rules for hole-like elements (2-3, 3-2 and 4-4 flips): the geometric mapping is defined such that the 3D volume vanishes at the temporal endpoints while the 4D measure is positive, yet no explicit quadrature formula or algebraic verification is supplied showing that the space-time divergence theorem holds exactly for the polynomial degree of the underlying ADER-DG scheme. Without this step the conservation and GCL properties remain formally unproven for the degenerate case.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a single sentence clarifying that the method is restricted to the three enumerated flip types on Delaunay tetrahedralizations.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions for the 4D visualizations should explicitly label the time coordinate and the two temporal faces to aid readers unfamiliar with the space-time construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the significance of the work and for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen the numerical verification and formal proofs as requested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical results] Numerical verification section: the claims of exact conservation, GCL satisfaction and order preservation are stated without accompanying quantitative tables (e.g., global conservation errors, GCL violation norms, or L2 error tables versus polynomial degree both with and without topology changes). This absence prevents assessment of whether the hole-like element quadrature introduces any residual that would violate the central assertions.

    Authors: We agree that the current presentation relies primarily on figures and qualitative assertions. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit quantitative tables reporting global conservation errors, GCL violation norms, and L2 error tables versus polynomial degree, both for runs with and without topology changes. These tables will directly quantify any residual introduced by the hole-like element quadrature. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Geometric construction of hole-like elements] Section describing the quadrature rules for hole-like elements (2-3, 3-2 and 4-4 flips): the geometric mapping is defined such that the 3D volume vanishes at the temporal endpoints while the 4D measure is positive, yet no explicit quadrature formula or algebraic verification is supplied showing that the space-time divergence theorem holds exactly for the polynomial degree of the underlying ADER-DG scheme. Without this step the conservation and GCL properties remain formally unproven for the degenerate case.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit algebraic verification is required for a formal proof. The revised version will supply the concrete quadrature formulas for the 2-3, 3-2 and 4-4 hole-like elements and will demonstrate algebraically that the space-time divergence theorem holds exactly for the polynomial degree employed by the ADER-DG scheme, thereby confirming conservation and GCL compliance for the degenerate elements. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper presents a novel geometric construction for 4D hole-like elements to handle topology changes in direct ALE ADER-DG schemes on 3D meshes. Conservation, GCL compliance, and order of accuracy are asserted via numerical tests on specific Delaunay flips rather than by algebraic reduction to fitted inputs or self-citations. No equations, parameter fits, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems are shown to collapse by construction to the authors' prior definitions or ansatzes. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and accurate integration of newly introduced 4D geometric objects whose properties are asserted rather than derived from prior literature.

invented entities (1)
  • hole-like elements no independent evidence
    purpose: Fill 4D space-time gaps created by topology changes while having zero 3D volume at both time endpoints
    These are presented as new 4D objects required by the direct ALE space-time integration on changing meshes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5891 in / 1258 out tokens · 44730 ms · 2026-05-25T03:38:42.974123+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    F. Alauzet. A changing-topology moving mesh technique for large displacements. Engineering with Computers, 30(2):175–200, 2014

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    Anderson, V .A Dobrev, T.V

    R.W. Anderson, V .A Dobrev, T.V . Kolev, R.N. Rieben, and V .Z. Tomov. High-order multi-material ALE hydrodynamics. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40(1):B32–B58, 2018

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    D.S. Balsara. Self-adjusting, positivity preserving high order schemes for hydrodynamics and magnetohydrody- namics. Journal of Computational Physics, 231(22):7504–7517, 2012

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Barlow, M

    A. Barlow, M. Klima, and M. Shashkov. Constrained optimization framework for interface-aware sub-scale dynamics models for voids closure in Lagrangian hydrodynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 371:914– 944, 2018

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Barlow, P

    A. Barlow, P. H. Maire, , W.J. Rider, R.N. Rieben, and M.J. Shashkov. Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods for modeling high-speed compressible multimaterial flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 322:603–665, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Belytschko and J.M

    T.B. Belytschko and J.M. Kennedy. Computer models for subassembly simulation. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 49(1-2):17–38, 1978

    work page 1978

  7. [7]

    D.J. Benson. Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes. Computer methods in Applied mechanics and Engineering, 99(2-3):235–394, 1992

    work page 1992

  8. [8]

    Berndt, J

    M. Berndt, J. Breil, S. Galera, M. Kucharik, P. H. Maire, and M. Shashkov. Two–step hybrid conserva- tive remapping for multimaterial arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 230:6664–6687, 2011

    work page 2011

  9. [9]

    Birke, C

    G. Birke, C. Engwer, J. Giesselmann, and S. May. Error Analysis of a First-Order DoD Cut Cell Method for 2D Unsteady Advection: G. Birke et al. Journal of Scientific Computing, 106(1):1, 2026

    work page 2026

  10. [10]

    Bo and M.J

    W. Bo and M.J. Shashkov. Adaptive reconnection-based arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian method. Journal of Computational Physics, 299:902–939, 2015. 32

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    Bochev, D

    P. Bochev, D. Ridzal, and M.J. Shashkov. Fast optimization-based conservative remap of scalar fields through aggregate mass transfer. Journal of Computational Physics, 246:37–57, 2013

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Bonafini, D

    M. Bonafini, D. Torlo, and E. Gaburro. Stability analysis of Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian ADER-DG methods on classical and degenerate spacetime geometries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.09198, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  13. [13]

    Boscheri and M

    W. Boscheri and M. Dumbser. Arbitrary–Lagrangian–Eulerian One–Step WENO Finite V olume Schemes on Unstructured Triangular Meshes. Communications in Computational Physics, 14:1174–1206, 2013

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    Boscheri and M

    W. Boscheri and M. Dumbser. A direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian ADER-WENO finite volume scheme on unstructured tetrahedral meshes for conservative and non-conservative hyperbolic systems in 3d. Journal of Computational Physics, 275:484 – 523, 2014

    work page 2014

  15. [15]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, and E. Gaburro. Continuous Finite Element Subgrid Basis Functions for Discontinu- ous Galerkin Schemes on Unstructured Polygonal V oronoi Meshes.Communications in Computational Physics, 32(1):259–298, 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, and M. Righetti. A semi-implicit scheme for 3D free surface flows with high-order velocity reconstruction on unstructured V oronoi meshes.International journal for numerical methods in fluids, 72(6):607–631, 2013

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Boscheri, M

    W. Boscheri, M. Dumbser, and O. Zanotti. High order cell-centered Lagrangian-type finite volume schemes with time-accurate local time stepping on unstructured triangular meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, 291:120–150, 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Busto, S

    S. Busto, S. Chiocchetti, M. Dumbser, E. Gaburro, and I. Peshkov. High order ADER schemes for continuum mechanics. Frontiers in Physics, 8:32, 2020

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Busto and M

    S. Busto and M. Dumbser. A new family of thermodynamically compatible discontinuous Galerkin methods for continuum mechanics and turbulent shallow water flows. Journal of Scientific Computing, 93(2):56, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Caramana and M.J

    E.J. Caramana and M.J. Shashkov. Elimination of artificial grid distorsion and hourglass–type motions by means of Lagrangian subzonal masses and pressures. Journal of Computational Physics, 142:521–561, 1998

    work page 1998

  21. [21]

    Castro, J.M

    M.J. Castro, J.M. Gallardo, J.A. López, and C. Parés. Well-balanced high order extensions of godunov’s method for semilinear balance laws. SIAM Journal of Numerical Analysis, 46:1012–1039, 2008

    work page 2008

  22. [22]

    Castro, J.M

    M.J. Castro, J.M. Gallardo, and C. Parés. High-order finite volume schemes based on reconstruction of states for solving hyperbolic systems with nonconservative products. Applications to shallow-water systems. Mathematics of Computation, 75:1103–1134, 2006

    work page 2006

  23. [23]

    Chiocchetti, I

    S. Chiocchetti, I. Peshkov, S. Gavrilyuk, and M. Dumbser. High order ADER schemes and GLM curl cleaning for a first order hyperbolic formulation of compressible flow with surface tension. Journal of Computational Physics, 426:109898, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [24]

    Ciallella, S

    M. Ciallella, S. Clain, E. Gaburro, and M. Ricchiuto. Very high order treatment of embedded curved boundaries in compressible flows: ADER discontinuous Galerkin with a space-time Reconstruction for Off-site data. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 175:1–18, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Colaïtis, S

    A. Colaïtis, S. Guisset, and J. Breil. A cell-centered Amr-Ale framework for 3d multi-material hydrodynamics. Part I: Lagrangian and indirect Euler Amr algorithms. Journal of Computational Physics, page 114701, 2026

    work page 2026

  26. [26]

    Colaïtis, S

    A. Colaïtis, S. Guisset, and J. Breil. A cell-centered AMR-ALE framework for 3D multi-material hydrodynamics. Part II: linesweep ALE rezoning for nonconformal block-structured AMR meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, page 114702, 2026

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    Cremonesi, A

    M. Cremonesi, A. Frangi, and U. Perego. A lagrangian finite element approach for the analysis of fluid–structure interaction problems. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 84(5):610–630, 2010. 33

    work page 2010

  28. [28]

    Cremonesi, S

    M. Cremonesi, S. Meduri, U. Perego, and A. Frangi. An explicit lagrangian finite element method for free-surface weakly compressible flows. Computational Particle Mechanics, 4(3):357–369, 2017

    work page 2017

  29. [29]

    Dassi, L

    F. Dassi, L. Kamenski, P. Farrell, and S. Hang. Tetrahedral mesh improvement using moving mesh smooth- ing, lazy searching flips, and RBF surface reconstruction. Computer-Aided Design, 103:2–13, 2018. 25th International Meshing Roundtable Special Issue: Advances in Mesh Generation

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    E. B. de L’isle and P. L. George. Optimization of tetrahedral meshes. In Modeling, Mesh Generation, and Adaptive Numerical Methods for Partial DifferentialEquations. The IMA V olumesin Mathematics and its Applications., volume 75, pages 97–127. Springer New York, 1995

    work page 1995

  31. [31]

    Del Pino and I

    S. Del Pino and I. Marmajou. Triangular metric-based mesh adaptation for compressible multi-material flows in semi-Lagrangian coordinates. Journal of Computational Physics, 478:111975, 2023

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    B. Després. Numerical methods for Eulerian and Lagrangian conservation laws. Birkhäuser, 2017

    work page 2017

  33. [33]

    B. Després. Lagrangian voronoï meshes and particle dynamics with shocks. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 418:116427, 2024

    work page 2024

  34. [34]

    Di Cristofaro, A

    D. Di Cristofaro, A. Frangi, and M. Cremonesi. 3d fluid–structure interaction simulation with an Arbitrary– Lagrangian–Eulerian approach with applications to flying objects. Engineering with Computers, pages 1–23, 2024

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Dobrev, T.E

    V .A. Dobrev, T.E. Ellis, Tz.V . Kolev, and R.N. Rieben. High order curvilinear finite elements for axisymmetric Lagrangian hydrodynamics. Computers and Fluids, 83:58–69, 2013

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Donéa, P

    J. Donéa, P. Fasoli-Stella, and S. Giuliani. Lagrangian and Eulerian finite element techniques for transient fluid-structure interaction problems. In Structural mechanics in reactor technology. 1977

    work page 1977

  37. [37]

    Donea, SHJP Giuliani, and J.-P

    J. Donea, SHJP Giuliani, and J.-P. Halleux. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 33(1-3):689– 723, 1982

    work page 1982

  38. [38]

    M. Dumbser. Arbitrary–Lagrangian–Eulerian ADER–WENO finite volume schemes with time–accurate local time stepping for hyperbolic conservation laws. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 280:57–83, 2014

    work page 2014

  39. [39]

    Dumbser, D.S

    M. Dumbser, D.S. Balsara, E.F. Toro, and C.-D. Munz. A unified framework for the construction of one-step finite volume and discontinuous Galerkin schemes on unstructured meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, 227(18):8209–8253, 2008

    work page 2008

  40. [40]

    Dumbser, I

    M. Dumbser, I. Peshkov, E. Romenski, and O. Zanotti. High order ADER schemes for a unified first order hyperbolic formulation of continuum mechanics: viscous heat-conducting fluids and elastic solids. Journal of Computational Physics, 314:824–862, 2016

    work page 2016

  41. [41]

    Dumbser, I

    M. Dumbser, I. Peshkov, E. Romenski, and O. Zanotti. High order ADER schemes for a unified first order hyper- bolic formulation of Newtonian continuum mechanics coupled with electro-dynamics. Journal of Computational Physics, 348:298–342, 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    Dumbser, O

    M. Dumbser, O. Zanotti, E. Gaburro, and I. Peshkov. A well-balanced discontinuous Galerkin method for the first–order Z4 formulation of the Einstein–Euler system. Journal of Computational Physics, page 112875, 2024

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    D.C. Eder, C. Parisuana, A. Fisher, P. Yip, T. Schwartzentruber, and A. Koniges. A 3D Arbitrary Lagrangian Eulerian Adaptive Mesh Refinement Framework for Simulating Hypersonic Raindrop Impacts. In AIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum, page 0730, 2026. 34

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    F. Fambri. Discontinuous Galerkin methods for compressible and incompressible flows on space–time adaptive meshes: toward a novel family of efficient numerical methods for fluid dynamics.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 27(1):199–283, 2020

    work page 2020

  45. [45]

    Guerrero Fernández, M.J

    E. Guerrero Fernández, M.J. Castro Díaz, M. Dumbser, and T. Morales De Luna. An arbitrary high order well-balanced ADER-DG numerical scheme for the multilayer shallow-water model with variable density. Journal of Scientific Computing, 90(1):52, 2022

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    L. A. Freitag and C. Ollivier-Gooch. Tetrahedral mesh improvement using swapping and smoothing.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 40(21):3979–4002, 1997

    work page 1997

  47. [47]

    E. Gaburro. A unified framework for the solution of hyperbolic PDE systems using high order direct Arbitrary- Lagrangian–Eulerian schemes on moving unstructured meshes with topology change.Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering, 28(3):1249–1321, 2021

    work page 2021

  48. [48]

    E. Gaburro. High order well-balanced Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian ADER discontinuous Galerkin schemes on general polygonal moving meshes. Computers & Fluids, page 106764, 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Gaburro, W

    E. Gaburro, W. Boscheri, S. Chiocchetti, C. Klingenberg, V . Springel, and M. Dumbser. High order di- rect arbitrary-lagrangian-eulerian schemes on moving voronoi meshes with topology changes. Journal of Computational Physics, 407:109167, 2020

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Gaburro, W

    E. Gaburro, W. Boscheri, S. Chiocchetti, and M. Ricchiuto. Discontinuous Galerkin schemes for hyperbolic systems in non-conservative variables: quasi-conservative formulation with subcell finite volume corrections. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 431:117311, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Gaburro and S

    E. Gaburro and S. Chiocchetti. High-order Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian schemes on crazy moving V oronoi meshes. In Young Researchers Conference, pages 99–119. Springer, 2021

    work page 2021

  52. [52]

    Gaburro, M

    E. Gaburro, M. Dumbser, and M.J. Castro. Direct Arbitrary-Lagrangian-Eulerian finite volume schemes on moving nonconforming unstructured meshes. Computers & Fluids, 159:254–275, 2017

    work page 2017

  53. [53]

    Gaburro, M

    E. Gaburro, M. Ricchiuto, and M. Dumbser. On general and complete multidimensional riemann solvers for nonlinear systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Computers and Fluids, 311, 2026

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    Gallice, A

    G. Gallice, A. Chan, R. Loubère, and P.-H. Maire. Entropy stable and positivity preserving Godunov-type schemes for multidimensional hyperbolic systems on unstructured grid. Journal of Computational Physics, 468:111493, 2022

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Guisset, G

    S. Guisset, G. Damour, and J. Breil. Cell-centered indirect Arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian numerical strategy for solving 3D gas dynamics equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 505:112903, 2024

    work page 2024

  56. [56]

    Han Veiga, P

    M. Han Veiga, P. Öffner, and D. Torlo. Dec and ader: similarities, differences and a unified framework.Journal of Scientific Computing, 87(1):1–35, 2021

    work page 2021

  57. [57]

    S. Hang. TetGen, a Delaunay-based quality tetrahedral mesh generator. ACM Trans. Math. Softw, 41(2):11, 2015

    work page 2015

  58. [58]

    Hidalgo and M

    A. Hidalgo and M. Dumbser. ADER schemes for nonlinear systems of stiffadvection–diffusion–reaction equations. Journal of Scientific Computing, 48(1-3):173–189, 2011

    work page 2011

  59. [59]

    Hirt, A.A

    C.W. Hirt, A.A. Amsden, and J.L. Cook. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian computing method for all flow speeds. Journal of computational physics, 14(3):227–253, 1974

    work page 1974

  60. [60]

    Hu and C.W

    C. Hu and C.W. Shu. A high-order WENO finite difference scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrody- namics. Journal of Computational Physics, 150:561 – 594, 1999. 35

    work page 1999

  61. [61]

    JR Hughes, W

    T. JR Hughes, W. K. Liu, and T.K. Zimmermann. Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element formulation for incom- pressible viscous flows. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 29(3):329–349, 1981

    work page 1981

  62. [62]

    H. Jackson. On the eigenvalues of the ADER-WENO Galerkin predictor. Journal of Computational Physics, 333:409–413, 2017

    work page 2017

  63. [63]

    F. Kemm, E. Gaburro, F. Thein, and M. Dumbser. A simple diffuse interface approach for compressible flows around moving solids of arbitrary shape based on a reduced Baer–Nunziato model. Computers & fluids, 204:104536, 2020

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Kenamond, D

    M. Kenamond, D. Kuzmin, and M. Shashkov. A positivity-preserving and conservative intersection-distribution- based remapping algorithm for staggered ale hydrodynamics on arbitrary meshes. Journal of Computational Physics, 435:110254, 2021

    work page 2021

  65. [65]

    Kincl, I

    O. Kincl, I. Peshkov, and W. Boscheri. A numerical method based on quasi-Lagrangian V oronoi cells for two-phase flows with large density contrast. Computers & Fluids, page 106813, 2025

    work page 2025

  66. [66]

    Klima, A

    M. Klima, A. Barlow, M. Kucharik, and M. Shashkov. An interface-aware sub-scale dynamics multi-material cell model for solids with void closure and opening at all speeds. Computers & Fluids, 208:104578, 2020

    work page 2020

  67. [67]

    Klima, M

    M. Klima, M. Kucharik, and R. Liska. Cell-centered Lagrangian Lax-WendroffHLL hybrid scheme in 3D. Journal of Computational Physics, 498:112675, 2024

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    B. M. Klingner and J. R. Shewchuk. Aggressive tetrahedral mesh improvement. In Proceedings of the 16th International Meshing Roundtable (Seattle, Washington), pages 3–23, 2007

    work page 2007

  69. [69]

    Kucharik and M

    M. Kucharik and M. Shashkov. Extension of efficient, swept-integration-based conservative remapping method for meshes with changing connectivity. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 56(8):1359– 1365, 2008

    work page 2008

  70. [70]

    Lakiss, T

    A. Lakiss, T. Heuzé, M. Tannous, and L. Stainier. ADER discontinuous Galerkin material point method. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 125(1):e7365, 2024

    work page 2024

  71. [71]

    N. Lei, J. Cheng, and C.-W. Shu. A high order positivity-preserving polynomial projection remapping method. Journal of Computational Physics, 474:111826, 2023

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    B. Lévy. Exact predicates, exact constructions and combinatorics for mesh CSG. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 44(5):1–27, 2025

    work page 2025

  73. [73]

    W. Liu, J. Cheng, and C.W. Shu. High order conservative Lagrangian schemes with Lax–Wendrofftype time discretization for the compressible Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 228:8872–8891, 2009

    work page 2009

  74. [74]

    Loubère, P

    R. Loubère, P. H. Maire, and M.J. Shashkov. ReALE: A Reconnection Arbitrary-Lagrangian–Eulerian method in cylindrical geometry. Computers and Fluids, 46:59–69, 2011

    work page 2011

  75. [75]

    Loubère, P

    R. Loubère, P. H. Maire, M.J. Shashkov, J. Breil, and S. Galera. ReALE: A reconnection-based arbitrary- Lagrangian–Eulerian method. Journal of Computational Physics, 229:4724–4761, 2010

    work page 2010

  76. [76]

    Loubère and M.J

    R. Loubère and M.J. Shashkov. A subcell remapping method on staggered polygonal grids for arbitrary– lagrangian–eulerian methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 23:155–160, 2004

    work page 2004

  77. [77]

    P.H. Maire. A unified sub-cell force-based discretization for cell-centered Lagrangian hydrodynamics on polygonal grids. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 65:1281–1294, 2011

    work page 2011

  78. [78]

    May and F

    S. May and F. Laakmann. Accuracy analysis for explicit-implicit finite volume schemes on cut cell meshes. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 6(4):2239–2264, 2024. 36

    work page 2024

  79. [79]

    May and F

    S. May and F. Streitbürger. DoD stabilization for non-linear hyperbolic conservation laws on cut cell meshes in one dimension. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 419:126854, 2022

    work page 2022

  80. [80]

    Micalizzi, D

    L. Micalizzi, D. Torlo, and W. Boscheri. Efficient iterative arbitrary high-order methods: an adaptive bridge between low and high order. Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, pages 1–38, 2023

    work page 2023

Showing first 80 references.