pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23835 · v1 · pith:VHRJJRDOnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🧮 math.AP · math.FA

Pointwise Estimates Near Singular Sets for Quasilinear Elliptic Equations

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.FA
keywords quasilinear elliptic equationsvariable exponentssingular setsremovabilityFinsler manifoldspointwise estimates1-Laplacian
0
0 comments X

The pith

A pointwise estimate |u(x)| ≤ C ρ1(x)^{-τ} near Γ proves removability of singularities for quasilinear elliptic equations and yields convergence to 1-Laplacian solutions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives the bound |u(x)| ≤ C ρ1(x)^{-τ} near the singular set Γ for weak solutions of -Δ_{p(x)} u + |u|^{q-1} u =0 in domains of a Finsler manifold. This bound serves as the key tool to establish that the singularity at Γ is removable. Under the existence assumption for solutions at each variable exponent p with 1 < p- ≤ p+ < min{2, q+1}, a subsequence converges as p+ → 1 to a BV solution of the limiting equation -Δ_1 u + |u|^{q-1} u =0. A sympathetic reader would care because the result controls solution behavior near singularities while passing from variable-exponent p-Laplace problems to the degenerate 1-Laplace case.

Core claim

The central claim is that the estimate |u(x)| ≤ C ρ1(x)^{-τ} holds near Γ for weak solutions u in W^{1,p(x)}_{loc}(Ω̄∖(Γ∪Σ);ϑ) ∩ L^∞_{loc} away from Γ and Σ, with C and τ approaching positive values as p+ →1; this estimate is the key ingredient proving the singularity at Γ is removable. Moreover, assuming existence of u_p for 1<p-≤p+<min{2,q+1}, there is subsequence convergence as p_m+→1 to a solution u∈BV(U;ϑ)∩L^{q+1}(U;ϑ) of -Δ_1 u + |u|^{q-1}u=0 in U.

What carries the argument

The pointwise estimate |u(x)| ≤ C ρ1(x)^{-τ} near Γ, derived from Lipschitz distance-type functions ρ1 and ρ2 satisfying F(·,∇ρ1)≤1 and F(·,∇ρ2)≤1 a.e.

If this is right

  • The singularity at Γ is removable for the weak solutions of the quasilinear equation.
  • There exists a subsequence {u_{p_m}} with p_m+→1 converging to a solution u in BV(U;ϑ)∩L^{q+1}(U;ϑ) of the 1-Laplacian equation.
  • The constants C and τ in the pointwise estimate remain positive in the limit p+→1.
  • The removability result holds in bounded domains Ω of the Finsler manifold (M,F,ϑ).
  • The estimate applies to the model problem in R^n with ρ1(x)=|(x_{d+1},…,x_n)| and ρ2(x)=|(x_1,…,x_d)|.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The convergence supplies a limiting procedure that approximates 1-Laplace problems by variable-exponent p-Laplace problems even when singular sets are present.
  • The technique of using distance-type Lipschitz functions ρ1, ρ2 may connect to regularity questions for other quasilinear equations with isolated singular sets.
  • The Finsler-manifold setting indicates the removability conclusion is stable under changes from Euclidean to non-Euclidean geometry.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that for every variable exponent satisfying 1<p-≤p+<min{2,q+1} there exists a weak solution u_p in W^{1,p(x)}_{loc}(Ω;ϑ)∩L^∞_{loc}(Ω) of the equation in the bounded domain Ω.

What would settle it

A weak solution u near Γ that violates |u(x)| ≤ C ρ1(x)^{-τ} for every C>0 and τ>0, or a sequence u_p with p+→1 that fails to converge to any BV solution of -Δ_1 u + |u|^{q-1}u=0.

read the original abstract

In this work, we study the removability of boundary singular sets for certain classes of quasilinear elliptic equations in domains $\Omega$ of an $n$-dimensional Finsler manifold ( $\mathcal{M}, F, \vartheta$ ). We work with Lipschitz functions $\rho_1$ and $\rho_2$ satisfying distance-type properties; in particular, $F(\cdot, \boldsymbol{\nabla} \rho_1) \leq 1$ and $F(\cdot, \boldsymbol{\nabla} \rho_2) \leq 1$ a.e. in $\mathcal{M}$. The singular set is defined by $\Gamma=\rho_1^{-1}(\{0\})$. The model problem is $-\Delta_{p(x)} u+|u|^{q-1} u=0$ in domains of $\mathbb{R}^n \cong \mathbb{R}^d \times \mathbb{R}^{n-d} \cong \rho_1^{-1}(\{0\}) \times \rho_2^{-1}(\{0\})$, where $\rho_1(x)=|(x_{d+1}, \ldots, x_n)|$ and $\rho_2(x)=|(x_1, \ldots, x_d)|$. The main tool in our analysis is the estimate $$ |u(x)| \leq \mathbf{C} \rho_1(x)^{-\tau} $$ near $\Gamma$ for weak solutions $u \in W_{loc}^{1, p(x)}(\bar{\Omega} \backslash(\Gamma \cup \Sigma) ; \vartheta) \cap L_{loc}^{\infty}(\bar{\Omega} \backslash(\Gamma \cup \Sigma))$, where the constants $\mathbf{C}>0$ and $\tau>0$ converge to positive values as $p^{+} \rightarrow 1$. This estimate is a key ingredient in proving that the singularity at $\Gamma$ is removable. Moreover, in a bounded domain $\Omega$, using this estimate and assuming that, for every variable exponent satisfying $1<p^{-} \leq p^{+}<\min \{2, q+1\}$, there exists a weak solution $u_p \in W_{loc}^{1, p(x)}(\Omega ; \vartheta) \cap L_{loc}^{\infty}(\Omega)$ of $$ -\operatorname{div}\left(|\boldsymbol{\nabla} u_p|_F^{p-2} \boldsymbol{\nabla} u_p\right)+|u_p|^{q-1} u_p=0 \quad \text { in } \Omega, $$ we prove that, for every $U \Subset \Omega$, there exists a subsequence $\{u_{p_m}\}$, with $p_m^{+} \rightarrow 1$, that converges to a solution $u \in B V(U ; \vartheta) \cap L^{q+1}(U ; \vartheta)$ of $$ -\Delta_1 u+|u|^{q-1} u=0 \quad \text { in } U . $$

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish the pointwise estimate |u(x)| ≤ C ρ_1(x)^{-τ} near the singular set Γ=ρ_1^{-1}({0}) for weak solutions u ∈ W^{1,p(x)}_{loc}(Ω̄∖(Γ∪Σ);ϑ) ∩ L^∞_{loc} of -Δ_{p(x)}u + |u|^{q-1}u=0 on Finsler manifolds, with C,τ>0 as p^+→1; this estimate is a key ingredient for removability of singularities at Γ. Additionally, assuming existence of solutions u_p ∈ W^{1,p(x)}_{loc}(Ω;ϑ)∩L^∞_{loc}(Ω) for every 1<p^-≤p^+<min{2,q+1}, it claims subsequence convergence as p_m^+→1 to a solution u∈BV(U;ϑ)∩L^{q+1}(U;ϑ) of -Δ_1 u + |u|^{q-1}u=0 in bounded subdomains U.

Significance. If valid, the pointwise estimate supplies a concrete decay rate near codimension-(n-d) singular sets that could support removability arguments for variable-exponent quasilinear equations on Finsler manifolds. The conditional convergence result would connect the variable-exponent theory to the 1-Laplacian limit, but its value is limited by the explicit existence hypothesis on which it rests. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding convergence section): the subsequence convergence claim as p_m^+→1 is load-bearing on the explicit hypothesis that weak solutions u_p exist for every variable exponent satisfying 1<p^-≤p^+<min{2,q+1}. The manuscript states this existence as an assumption rather than deriving or citing it, so the convergence statement is void without independent verification of the hypothesis.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The notation for the constants C and τ (boldface C in the abstract) and the precise dependence of τ on p^+, q, n, d should be clarified in the statement of the main estimate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review. The sole major comment is addressed point-by-point below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (and the corresponding convergence section): the subsequence convergence claim as p_m^+→1 is load-bearing on the explicit hypothesis that weak solutions u_p exist for every variable exponent satisfying 1<p^-≤p^+<min{2,q+1}. The manuscript states this existence as an assumption rather than deriving or citing it, so the convergence statement is void without independent verification of the hypothesis.

    Authors: We agree that the convergence result is conditional on the stated existence hypothesis for u_p. This hypothesis is explicitly declared in both the abstract and the convergence section, and the theorem is formulated accordingly as a conditional statement. The manuscript's primary contributions are the pointwise decay estimate |u| ≤ C ρ_1^{-τ} (with constants controlled as p^+ → 1) and its application to removability; the convergence to the 1-Laplacian is presented as a consequence once existence is granted. Establishing existence of weak solutions to the variable-exponent equation on Finsler manifolds for the full range 1 < p^- ≤ p^+ < min{2,q+1} is a substantial analytic task outside the scope of the present work, which centers on a priori estimates near singular sets. No citation for this existence result is known to us in the precise setting considered, and we therefore retain the assumption as written. The conditional nature of the claim is already transparent to readers. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; estimate derived from weak form and convergence conditional on explicit external assumption

full rationale

The paper presents the pointwise estimate as obtained from analysis of the weak formulation of -Δ_{p(x)} u + |u|^{q-1}u = 0 for any given weak solution in the stated Sobolev class. The subsequence convergence to a 1-Laplacian solution is stated only under the separate hypothesis that solutions u_p exist for every admissible variable exponent; the paper does not derive or claim to derive that existence. No equations reduce by construction to fitted inputs, no self-citations are load-bearing for the central claims, and no ansatz or uniqueness result is smuggled in. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against the paper's own stated assumptions and does not collapse to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on abstract; relies on standard background in variable-exponent Sobolev spaces, Finsler geometry, and weak solutions, plus one explicit existence assumption for the convergence step. No free parameters or invented entities are visible.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Finsler manifold (M,F,ϑ) and Lipschitz ρ1,ρ2 satisfy F(·,∇ρi)≤1 a.e. with distance-type properties
    Used to define Γ=ρ1^{-1}(0) and set up the model problem in R^n ≅ R^d × R^{n-d}.
  • domain assumption Existence of weak solutions u_p for every p(x) with 1<p−≤p+<min{2,q+1}
    Explicitly assumed to obtain the p+→1 convergence to the 1-Laplacian solution in BV.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 6104 in / 1617 out tokens · 43627 ms · 2026-05-25T03:16:42.226646+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 94 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    N. Aguirre. 𝑝-Harmonic Functions in R𝑁+ with Nonlinear Neumann Boundary Conditions and Measure Data.Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 19:797–825, 2019

  2. [2]

    Ambrosio and S

    L. Ambrosio and S. Di Marino. Equivalent definitions of𝐵𝑉 space and of total variation on metric measure spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 266(7):4150–4188, 2014

  3. [3]

    Ambrosio, N

    L. Ambrosio, N. Gigli, and G. Savar´e. Gradient flows in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures. Basel: Birkh¨auser, 2nd ed. edition, 2008

  4. [4]

    Andreu, C

    F. Andreu, C. Ballester, V. Caselles, and J. M. Maz´on. The Dirichlet problem for the total variation flow.J. Funct. Anal., 180(2):347–403, 2001

  5. [5]

    Andreu, J

    F. Andreu, J. M. Maz´on, J. S. Moll, and V. Caselles. The minimizing total variation flow with measure initial conditions. Commun. Contemp. Math., 6(3):431–494, 2004

  6. [6]

    J. A. Apaza and M. de Souza. Removable singularities in the boundary for quasilinear elliptic equations.NoDEA, Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl., 31(4):27, 2024

  7. [7]

    Baras and M

    P. Baras and M. Pierre. Singularit´es ´eliminables pour des ´equations semi-lin´eaires. Ann. Inst. Fourier, 34(1):185–206, 1984

  8. [8]

    Bellettini, V

    G. Bellettini, V. Caselles, and M. Novaga. Explicit solutions of the eigenvalue problem− div 𝑑𝑢 | 𝑑𝑢 | = 𝑢 in 𝑅2. SIAM J. Math. Anal., 36(4):1095–1129, 2005

  9. [9]

    Bidaut-V´eron, M

    M. Bidaut-V´eron, M. Garcia-Huidobro, and L. Veron. Local and global properties of solutions of quasilinear Hamilton-Jacobi equations. J. Funct. Anal., 267:3294–3331, 2014

  10. [10]

    M. F. Bidaut-V´eron. Removable singularities and existence for a quasilinear equation with absorption or source term and measure data. Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 3:25–63, 2003

  11. [11]

    Bj¨orn and J

    A. Bj¨orn and J. Bj¨orn. Local and semilocal Poincar´e inequalities on metric spaces. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 119:158–192, 2018

  12. [12]

    V. I. Bogachev. Measure theory, volume II. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2007

  13. [13]

    Brezis and L

    H. Brezis and L. V ´eron. Removable singularities of some nonlinear equations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 75:1–6, 1980

  14. [14]

    Buffa, G

    V. Buffa, G. E. Comi, and M. j. Miranda. On BV functions and essentially bounded divergence-measure fields in metric spaces. Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 38(3):883–946, 2022

  15. [15]

    L. A. Caffarelli and Y. Yuan. Singular solutions to Monge-Amp`ere equation. Anal. Theory Appl., 38(2):121–127, 2022

  16. [16]

    Champion and L

    T. Champion and L. De Pascale. Asymptotic behaviour of nonlinear eigenvalue problems involving 𝑝-Laplacian-type operators. Proc. R. Soc. Edinb., Sect. A, Math., 137(6):1179–1195, 2007

  17. [17]

    Cheng and Y

    X. Cheng and Y. Feng. Harnack inequality and the relevant theorems on Finsler metric measure manifolds.Result. Math., 79(4):37, 2024

  18. [18]

    P. Cianci. Removability of singularity for an anisotropic elliptic equation of second order with nonstandard growth.Nonlinear Anal., 73(6):1812–1819, 2010

  19. [19]

    Cicalese and C

    M. Cicalese and C. Trombetti. Asymptotic behaviour of solutions to 𝑝-Laplacian equation. Asymptotic Anal., 35(1):27–40, 2003

  20. [20]

    Introduction to Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization

    C. Clason and T. Valkonen. Introduction to Nonsmooth Analysis and Optimization. Preprint, arXiv:2001.00216 [math.OC] (2025), 2025

  21. [21]

    D. V. Cruz-Uribe and A. Fiorenza. Variable Lebesgue spaces. Foundations and harmonic analysis. Appl. Numer. Harmon. Anal. New York, NY: Birkh¨auser/Springer, 2013

  22. [22]

    Degiovanni and M

    M. Degiovanni and M. Marzocchi. Limit of minimax values under Γ-convergence. Electron. J. Differ. Equ., 2014:19, 2014

  23. [23]

    M. A. del Pino and R. F. Man´asevich. Global bifurcation from the eigenvalues of the 𝑝-Laplacian. J. Differ. Equations, 92(2):226–251, 1991

  24. [24]

    Della Pietra, C

    F. Della Pietra, C. Nitsch, F. Oliva, and C. Trombetti. On the behavior of the first eigenvalue of the𝑝-Laplacian with Robin boundary conditions as 𝑝 goes to 1. Adv. Calc. Var., 16(4):1123–1135, 2023

  25. [25]

    Demengel

    F. Demengel. On some nonlinear equation involving the 1-Laplacian and trace map inequalities. Nonlinear Anal. , 48(8):1151–1163, 2002

  26. [26]

    Demengel

    F. Demengel. Th´eor`emes d’existence pour des´equations avec l’op´erateur ≪ 1-Laplacien≫, premi`ere valeur propre pour −Δ1. Comptes Rendus. Math´ematique, 334(12):1071–1076, 2002

  27. [27]

    Demengel

    F. Demengel. Functions locally almost 1-harmonic. Appl. Anal., 83(9):865–896, 2004. 30 JUAN PABLO ALCON APAZA

  28. [28]

    Di Marino

    S. Di Marino. Recent advances on BV and Sobolev spaces in metric measure spaces. PhD thesis, Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, 2014. Available at CVGMT

  29. [29]

    DiBenedetto

    E. DiBenedetto. Real analysis. Birkh¨auser Adv. Texts, Basler Lehrb¨ uch. New York, NY: Birkh¨auser/Springer, 2nd edition edition, 2016

  30. [30]

    Diening, P

    L. Diening, P. Harjulehto, P. H¨ast¨o, and M. Ruzicka. Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces with variable exponents. Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer, Heidelberg, 2011

  31. [31]

    Don and D

    S. Don and D. Vittone. A compactness result for BV functions in metric spaces.Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn., Math., 44(1):329–339, 2019

  32. [32]

    L. C. Evans. Partial differential equations, volume 19 of Grad. Stud. Math. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2nd ed. edition, 2010

  33. [33]

    E. B. Fabes and D. W. Stroock. The 𝐿 𝑝-integrability of Green’s functions and fundamental solutions for elliptic and parabolic equations. Duke Math. J., 51:997–1016, 1984

  34. [34]

    S. Fakhi. New existence results for singular solutions of some semilinear elliptic equations. Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 25(9-10):1649–1668, 2000

  35. [35]

    Farkas, A

    C. Farkas, A. Krist ´aly, and C. Varga. Singular Poisson equations on Finsler–Hadamard manifolds. Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations, 54:1219–1241, 2015

  36. [36]

    Friedman and L

    A. Friedman and L. V´eron. Singular solutions of some quasilinear elliptic equations.Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 96:359–387, 1986

  37. [37]

    Fu and Y

    Y. Fu and Y. Shan. On the removability of isolated singular points for elliptic equations involving variable exponent.Adv. Nonlinear Anal., 5(2):121–132, 2016

  38. [38]

    Futamura, Y

    T. Futamura, Y. Mizuta, and T. Shimomura. Sobolev embeddings for variable exponent Riesz potentials on metric spaces. Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 31(2):495–522, 2006

  39. [39]

    Gaczkowski and P

    M. Gaczkowski and P. G´orka. Sobolev spaces with variable exponents on Riemannian manifolds.Nonlinear Anal., 92:47–59, 2013

  40. [40]

    Gaczkowski, P

    M. Gaczkowski, P. G´orka, and D. J. Pons. Sobolev spaces with variable exponents on complete manifolds. J. Funct. Anal., 270(4):1379–1415, 2016

  41. [41]

    G´orka and A

    P. G´orka and A. Macios. Almost everything you need to know about relatively compact sets in variable Lebesgue spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 269(7):1925–1949, 2015

  42. [42]

    G´orny and J

    W. G´orny and J. M. Maz´on. On the 𝑝-Laplacian evolution equation in metric measure spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 283(8):55, 2022

  43. [43]

    G´orny and J

    W. G´orny and J. M. Maz´on. The Anzellotti-Gauss-Green formula and least gradient functions in metric measure spaces. Commun. Contemp. Math., 26(6):42, 2024

  44. [44]

    G´orny and J

    W. G´orny and J. M. Maz´on. Weak solutions to gradient flows in metric measure spaces, volume 235 of Camb. Tracts Math. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2026

  45. [45]

    Harjulehto, P

    P. Harjulehto, P. H¨ast¨o, and V. Latvala. Sobolev embeddings in metric measure spaces with variable dimension.Math. Z., 254:591–609, 2006

  46. [46]

    Harjulehto, P

    P. Harjulehto, P. H¨ast¨o, and M. Pere. Variable exponent Lebesgue spaces on metric spaces: the Hardy-Littlewood maximal operator. Real Anal. Exch., 30(1):87–104, 2005

  47. [47]

    Harjulehto, P

    P. Harjulehto, P. H¨ast¨o, and M. Pere. Variable exponent Sobolev spaces on metric measure spaces.Funct. Approx. Comment. Math., 36:79–94, 2006

  48. [48]

    P. A. H¨ast¨o. Counter-examples of regularity in variable exponent Sobolev spaces. InThe 𝑝-harmonic equation and recent advances in analysis. Proceedings of the 3rd prairie analysis seminar, Manhattan, KS, USA, October 17–18, 2003, pages 133–143. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2005

  49. [49]

    Heinonen, P

    J. Heinonen, P. Koskela, N. Shanmugalingam, and J. T. Tyson.Sobolev spaces on metric measure spaces. An approach based on upper gradients, volume 27 of New Math. Monogr.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015

  50. [50]

    Horiuchi

    T. Horiuchi. Removable singularities for quasilinear degenerate elliptic equations with absorption term.J. Math. Soc. Japan, 53(3):513–540, 2001

  51. [51]

    Y. X. Huang. On the eigenvalues of the 𝑝-Laplacian with varying 𝑝. Proc. Am. Math. Soc., 125(11):3347–3354, 1997

  52. [52]

    Juutinen

    P. Juutinen. 𝑝-harmonic approximation of functions of least gradient. Indiana Univ. Math. J., 54(4):1015–1029, 2005

  53. [53]

    Juutinen and P

    P. Juutinen and P. Lindqvist. Removability of a level set for solutions of quasilinear equations.Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 30:305–321, 2005

  54. [54]

    B. Kawohl. On a family of torsional creep problems. J. Reine Angew. Math., 410:1–22, 1990

  55. [55]

    B. Kawohl. From 𝑝-Laplace to mean curvature operator and related questions. In Progress in partial differential equations: the Metz surveys. Papers from the ’Metz days’ conferences, held in Metz, France, during 1989-1990, pages 40–56. Harlow: Longman Scientific &— Technical; New York: Wiley, 1991

  56. [56]

    Kawohl and V

    B. Kawohl and V. Fridman. Isoperimetric estimates for the first eigenvalue of the 𝑝-Laplace operator and the Cheeger constant. Commentat. Math. Univ. Carol., 44(4):659–667, 2003

  57. [57]

    Kawohl and M

    B. Kawohl and M. Novaga. The 𝑝-Laplace eigenvalue problem as 𝑝 → 1 and Cheeger sets in a Finsler metric. J. Convex Anal., 15(3):623–634, 2008

  58. [58]

    V. A. Kondrat’ev and E. M. Landis. On qualitative properties of solutions of a nonlinear equation of second order.Math. USSR, Sb., 63(2):337–350, 1989

  59. [59]

    Kov ˘aˇcik and J

    O. Kov ˘aˇcik and J. R˘akosnik. On spaces 𝐿 𝑝 ( 𝑥 ) and 𝑊 𝑘, 𝑝 ( 𝑥 ). Czechoslovak Math. J., 41(116):592–618, 1991. POINTWISE ESTIMATES NEAR SINGULAR SETS FOR QUASILINEAR ELLIPTIC EQUATIONS 31

  60. [60]

    M. Kra¨ıem. On some nonlinear partial differential equations involving the 1-Laplacian.Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, Math. (6), 16(4):905–921, 2007

  61. [61]

    Krist´aly, B

    A. Krist´aly, B. Li, and W. Zhao. Failure of famous functional inequalities on Finsler manifolds: the influence of𝑆-curvature. Preprint, arXiv:2409.05497, 2025

  62. [62]

    Lahti and N

    P. Lahti and N. Shanmugalingam. Trace theorems for functions of bounded variation in metric spaces. J. Funct. Anal., 274(10):2754–2791, 2018

  63. [63]

    Lefton and D

    L. Lefton and D. Wei. Numerical approximation of the first eigenpair of the 𝑝-Laplacian using finite elements and the penalty method. Numer. Funct. Anal. Optim., 18(3-4):389–399, 1997

  64. [64]

    E. H. Lieb and M. Loss. Analysis., volume 14 of Grad. Stud. Math. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS), 2nd ed. edition, 2001

  65. [65]

    Liskevich and I

    V. Liskevich and I. I. Skrypnik. Isolated singularities of solutions to quasi-linear elliptic equations with absorption. J. Math. Anal. Appl., 338(1):536–544, 2008

  66. [66]

    Littig and F

    S. Littig and F. Schuricht. Convergence of the eigenvalues of the𝑝-Laplace operator as 𝑝 goes to 1. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ., 49(1-2):707–727, 2014

  67. [67]

    Luˇci´c and E

    D. Luˇci´c and E. Pasqualetto. Infinitesimal Hilbertianity of weighted Riemannian manifolds.Can. Math. Bull., 63(1):118–140, 2020

  68. [68]

    F. I. Mamedov and A. Harman. On the removability of isolated singular points for degenerating nonlinear elliptic equations. Nonlinear Anal., 71(12):6290–6298, 2009

  69. [69]

    J. M. Maz ´on. The Cheeger cut and Cheeger problem in metric measure spaces. NoDEA, Nonlinear Differ. Equ. Appl., 31(1):32, 2024

  70. [70]

    Mercaldo, S

    A. Mercaldo, S. Segura de Le´on, and C. Trombetti. On the behaviour of the solutions to 𝑝-Laplacian equations as 𝑝 goes to

  71. [71]

    Mat., Barc., 52(2):377–411, 2008

    Publ. Mat., Barc., 52(2):377–411, 2008

  72. [72]

    M. Merkle. Topics in weak convergence of probability measures. InFour topics in mathematics, pages 238–274. Beograd: Matematiˇcki Institut SANU, 2000

  73. [73]

    ´A. Mester. Functional Inequalities on Riemann-Finsler Manifolds. PhD thesis, ´Obuda University, Budapest, June 2022

  74. [74]

    Miculescu

    R. Miculescu. Approximation of continuous functions by Lipschitz functions. Real Anal. Exch., 26(1):449–452, 2001

  75. [75]

    M. Miranda. Functions of bounded variation on “good” metric spaces. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9), 82(8):975–1004, 2003

  76. [76]

    Musielak

    J. Musielak. Orlicz Spaces and Modular Spaces, volume 226 of Lecture Notes in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 1 edition, 1983

  77. [77]

    Y. V. Namlyeyeva, A. E. Shishkov, and I. I. Skrypnik. Isolated singularities of solutions of quasilinear anisotropic elliptic equations. Adv. Nonlinear Stud., 6(4):617–641, 2006

  78. [78]

    Nicolosi, I

    F. Nicolosi, I. V. Skrypnik, and I. I. Skrypnik. Precise point-wise growth conditions for removable isolated singularities. Commun. Partial Differ. Equations, 28(3-4):677–696, 2003

  79. [79]

    Ohta and K.-T

    S.-I. Ohta and K.-T. Sturm. Heat flow on Finsler manifolds. Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 62(10):1386–1433, 2009

  80. [80]

    E. Parini. Asymptotic behaviour of higher eigenfunctions of the 𝑝-Laplacian as 𝑝 goes to 1. PhD thesis, Universit¨at zu K¨oln, 2009

Showing first 80 references.