pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.24277 · v1 · pith:UVPYTQ5Rnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 📡 eess.SP

A Digital Twin Platform Enabling Monolithic Crystal-Free Bluetooth Low Energy Single-Chip Sensor Motes

Brandon P. Hippe , Jacob N. Louie , Dingyu Zhou , Alfonso Cort\'es , Filip Maksimovic , Tengfei Chang , David C. Burnett This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 14:16 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords digital twinBluetooth Low Energycrystal-freesensor motespre-silicon validationRF front endbaseband
0
0 comments X

The pith

A digital twin platform allows pre-silicon validation of crystal-free Bluetooth Low Energy sensor motes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a digital twin ecosystem for Bluetooth Low-Energy with physical-layer control to enable development of crystal-free single-chip sensor motes. Large-scale environmental sensor networks require low-power wireless devices, but novel architectures lack commercial development platforms for testing. The system is demonstrated with multiple configurations including software defined radios and FPGAs paired with crystal-free front ends. These achieve communication with commercial BLE devices at receiver sensitivities up to -82 dBm, exceeding the specification. This approach promises inexpensive and reusable validation tools to reduce costs and risks in sensor network deployment.

Core claim

The authors present a digital twin platform for BLE with PHY control that supports multiple RF front ends and digital baseband implementations, including a commercially available SDR with synthesized RTL and embedded firmware along with an existing crystal-free SoC front end and FPGA digital baseband. These configurations communicate sensor data with commercially available BLE devices and achieve receiver sensitivities up to -82 dBm, exceeding the minimum BLE specification.

What carries the argument

The digital twin ecosystem with physical-layer control for novel device development and validation.

If this is right

  • The platform supports multiple RF front ends and digital baseband implementations for flexible testing.
  • It enables communication with commercial BLE devices for real-world validation.
  • Receiver sensitivities exceed the minimum BLE specification.
  • The system is extendable to other hardware and communication protocols.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar digital twins could support development of crystal-free devices using other wireless protocols.
  • This approach may lower the cost barrier for custom sensor mote designs in large environmental monitoring deployments.
  • Pre-silicon tools like this could be adapted to test power consumption or integration with additional sensors.

Load-bearing premise

The digital twin accurately models the RF front-end and baseband behavior of novel crystal-free implementations sufficiently for reliable pre-silicon validation.

What would settle it

Fabricate a crystal-free BLE mote guided by the digital twin predictions and measure whether its actual receiver sensitivity and communication performance with commercial devices match the reported results.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24277 by Alfonso Cort\'es, Brandon P. Hippe, David C. Burnett, Dingyu Zhou, Filip Maksimovic, Jacob N. Louie, Tengfei Chang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proposed digital twin platform, with Crystal-Free SC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Block diagram of the proposed Bluetooth low-energy digital twin transceiver, showing how various subsystems can [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Phase noise comparison of two oscillators with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Event diagram for active scanning. Though not spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Block and flow diagrams of the connectable [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Packet sniffer [35] showing packets of active scanning event performed by a commercially available device and the proposed platform, in this case, the ADALM-PLUTO SDR [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Received power vs bit error rate (BER) for the pro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Low-power wireless-capable systems-on-chips (SoCs) are critical for researching many of our current environmental issues. The scale at which these devices are needed for many applications necessitates innovation in their design to reduce the various capital and labor costs involved with operating an extensive sensor network. This can be difficult for devices with novel wireless architectures, as many emerging architectures lack commercially available development platforms. This makes pre-silicon validation challenging, and the impact of a failed tapeout is unacceptable when the cost is of primary concern for these devices. In this work, we propose a digital twin ecosystem for Bluetooth Low-Energy (BLE) with physical-layer (PHY) control intended for novel device development and demonstrated through use with crystal-free single-chip sensor motes. We present this system operating with multiple RF front ends and digital baseband implementations, including a commercially available Software Defined Radio (SDR) with synthesized RTL and embedded firmware, along with an existing crystal-free SoC front end and FPGA digital baseband. These configurations are shown to be capable of communicating sensor data with commercially available BLE devices and achieving receiver sensitivities up to -82 dBm, exceeding the minimum BLE specification. This approach is extendable to other hardware and communication protocols and promises to enable inexpensive, reusable validation and verification tools for novel wireless devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a digital twin ecosystem for Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) physical-layer control, intended to support pre-silicon validation of novel crystal-free single-chip sensor motes. It demonstrates operation across multiple hardware configurations—including a commercially available SDR with synthesized RTL and an existing crystal-free SoC front-end paired with FPGA digital baseband—showing interoperability with commercial BLE devices and receiver sensitivities reaching -82 dBm, which exceeds the BLE minimum specification. The approach is presented as extendable to other hardware and protocols.

Significance. If the digital twin's modeling fidelity for RF front-end and baseband behavior is established, the platform could meaningfully reduce tape-out risk and cost for innovative low-power wireless SoCs in large-scale environmental sensing applications. The emphasis on reusable, inexpensive validation tools for architectures lacking commercial development platforms addresses a genuine practical gap.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the central claim is that the digital twin enables reliable pre-silicon validation for novel crystal-free BLE motes, yet all reported performance numbers (interoperability, -82 dBm sensitivity) are obtained from physical post-silicon configurations (SDR + FPGA or existing crystal-free SoC). No results are shown in which the twin itself generates sensitivity curves, BER data, or interoperability predictions for a new pre-silicon architecture prior to tape-out; this leaves the modeling accuracy required for the stated use-case unverified.
  2. [Demonstration sections (inferred from abstract)] The manuscript does not provide quantitative validation (e.g., measured vs. simulated BER, sensitivity curves, or timing diagrams) comparing digital-twin outputs against the physical hardware used in the demonstrations; without such side-by-side data the claim that the twin is sufficiently accurate for pre-silicon decisions cannot be assessed.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'achieving receiver sensitivities up to -82 dBm' should be accompanied by the measurement conditions (packet length, modulation index, temperature, etc.) even in the abstract to allow immediate evaluation against the BLE spec.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and recommendation. We respond point-by-point to the major comments below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: the central claim is that the digital twin enables reliable pre-silicon validation for novel crystal-free BLE motes, yet all reported performance numbers (interoperability, -82 dBm sensitivity) are obtained from physical post-silicon configurations (SDR + FPGA or existing crystal-free SoC). No results are shown in which the twin itself generates sensitivity curves, BER data, or interoperability predictions for a new pre-silicon architecture prior to tape-out; this leaves the modeling accuracy required for the stated use-case unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript demonstrates the digital twin ecosystem operating in real time with post-silicon hardware (SDR+RTL and crystal-free SoC+FPGA) to achieve the reported BLE interoperability and sensitivity. These configurations serve to establish that the twin can control PHY behavior across multiple front-ends. We agree that the manuscript does not contain explicit pre-tapeout sensitivity or BER predictions generated solely by the twin for a hypothetical new architecture, as no new silicon was fabricated. We will revise the abstract and introduction to distinguish the demonstrated post-silicon operation from the intended pre-silicon use case and add a brief discussion of how the existing modeling framework would be applied to a new design. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Demonstration sections (inferred from abstract)] The manuscript does not provide quantitative validation (e.g., measured vs. simulated BER, sensitivity curves, or timing diagrams) comparing digital-twin outputs against the physical hardware used in the demonstrations; without such side-by-side data the claim that the twin is sufficiently accurate for pre-silicon decisions cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current manuscript does not include direct side-by-side quantitative comparisons (measured vs. twin-simulated BER, sensitivity curves, or timing diagrams) between the digital twin outputs and the physical hardware results. The reported metrics reflect end-to-end system performance. We will add such validation data and figures in the revised manuscript to allow assessment of modeling fidelity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; empirical hardware results stand independently of modeling claims

full rationale

The manuscript presents an engineering platform demonstration using physical post-silicon hardware (SDR + FPGA, existing crystal-free SoC). Reported metrics such as -82 dBm sensitivity and BLE interoperability are obtained directly from these setups. No equations, fitted parameters, self-citations, or derivation steps appear that would reduce any central claim to its own inputs by construction. The work is therefore self-contained as an experimental report rather than a closed mathematical or parametric loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted or audited.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5789 in / 981 out tokens · 34048 ms · 2026-06-30T14:16:45.421990+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 25 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Hamed Ahmadi, Avishek Nag, Zaheer Khar, Kamran Sayrafian, and Susanto Rahardja. 2021. Networked Twins and Twins of Networks: An Overview on the Relationship Between Digital Twins and 6G.IEEE Communications Standards Magazine5, 4 (Dec. 2021), 154–160. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOMSTD.0001. 2000041 Conference Name: IEEE Communications Standards Magazine

    work page doi:10.1109/mcomstd.0001 2021

  2. [2]

    In: 2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC)

    Abdullah Alghaihab, Xing Chen, Yao Shi, Daniel S. Truesdell, Benton H. Calhoun, and David D. Wentzloff. 2020. 30.7 A Crystal-Less BLE Transmitter with -86dBm Frequency-Hopping Back-Channel WRX and Over-the-Air Clock Recovery from a GFSK-Modulated BLE Packet. In2020 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference - (ISSCC). 472–474. https://doi.org/10.1...

    work page doi:10.1109/isscc19947.2020.9062935 2020

  3. [3]

    AMD. 2025. AMD Zynq™7000 SoCs. https://www.amd.com/en/products/ adaptive-socs-and-fpgas/soc/zynq-7000.html

    2025

  4. [4]

    Analog Devices. 2025. ADALM-PLUTO Overview [Analog Devices Wiki]. https: //wiki.analog.com/university/tools/pluto

    2025

  5. [5]

    Analog Devices. 2025. the libIIO documentation. https://analogdevicesinc. github.io/libiio/master/index.html

    2025

  6. [6]

    Lina Bariah, Hikmet Sari, and Mérouane Debbah. 2023. Digital Twin-Empowered Communications: A New Frontier of Wireless Networks.IEEE Communications Magazine61, 12 (Dec. 2023), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2300069 Conference Name: IEEE Communications Magazine

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2300069 2023

  7. [7]

    BlueKitchen. 2025. BlueKitchen – BlueKitchen GmbH | Dual-mode Bluetooth Stack – Available in Source Code. https://bluekitchen-gmbh.com/

    2025

  8. [8]

    Burnett, Filip Maksimovic, Brad Wheeler, Osama Khan, Ali M

    David C. Burnett, Filip Maksimovic, Brad Wheeler, Osama Khan, Ali M. Niknejad, and Kristofer S.J. Pister. 2021. Free-running 2.4GHz Ring Oscillator-Based FSK TX/RX for Ultra-Small IoT Motes. In2020 15th European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC). 101–104. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 9337291

    2021

  9. [9]

    Burnett, and Kris Pister

    Tengfei Chang, Thomas Watteyne, Brad Wheeler, Filip Maksimovic, David C. Burnett, and Kris Pister. 2022. Surviving the Hair Dryer: Continuous Calibration of a Crystal-Free Mote-on-Chip.IEEE Internet of Things Journal9, 6 (March 2022), 4737–4747. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2021.3108077 Conference Name: IEEE Internet of Things Journal

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3108077 2022

  10. [10]

    D’Andrea, U

    A.N. D’Andrea, U. Mengali, and R. Reggiannini. 1990. A digital approach to clock recovery in generalized minimum shift keying.IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology39, 3 (Aug. 1990), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1109/25. 131004 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology

    work page doi:10.1109/25 1990

  11. [11]

    Digilent. 2023. Digital Discovery - Digilent Reference. https://digilent. com/reference/test-and-measurement/digital-discovery/start?srsltid= AfmBOooOKOJVv8_tTRDpWYyrb7XqbbrQo-bQngJ2W0eDLuJAKq80LNYS

    2023

  12. [12]

    Digilent. 2025. Analog Discovery 2: 100MS/s USB Oscilloscope, Logic Analyzer and Variable Power Supply. https://digilent.com/shop/analog-discovery-2- 100ms-s-usb-oscilloscope-logic-analyzer-and-variable-power-supply/

    2025

  13. [13]

    Ali Hajimiri and Thomas H. Lee. 1999.The Design of Low Noise Oscillators(1999 ed.). Kluwer Academic Publishers

    1999

  14. [14]

    Hippe and David C

    Brandon P. Hippe and David C. Burnett. 2024. Digital Baseband Architecture and Simulated Low-IF FSK Receiver Performance. In2024 IEEE Asia Pacific Conference on Circuits and Systems (APCCAS). 437–441. https://doi.org/10.1109/ 9 Hippe, et al. APCCAS62602.2024.10808708 ISSN: 2768-3516

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    IEEE. 2020. IEEE Standard for Low-Rate Wireless Networks.IEEE Std 802.15.4- 2020 (Revision of IEEE Std 802.15.4-2015)(July 2020), 1–800. https://doi.org/10. 1109/IEEESTD.2020.9144691

    work page arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Khan, Walid Saad, Dusit Niyato, Zhu Han, and Choong Seon Hong

    Latif U. Khan, Walid Saad, Dusit Niyato, Zhu Han, and Choong Seon Hong. 2022. Digital-Twin-Enabled 6G: Vision, Architectural Trends, and Future Directions. IEEE Communications Magazine60, 1 (Jan. 2022), 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1109/ MCOM.001.21143 Conference Name: IEEE Communications Magazine

    2022

  17. [17]

    Xingqin Lin, Lopamudra Kundu, Chris Dick, Emeka Obiodu, Todd Mostak, and Mike Flaxman. 2023. 6G Digital Twin Networks: From Theory to Practice.IEEE Communications Magazine61, 11 (Nov. 2023), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.1109/ MCOM.001.2200830 Conference Name: IEEE Communications Magazine

    2023

  18. [18]

    Niknejad, and Kristofer S.J

    Daniel Lovell, Titan Yuan, Yu-Chi Lin, Maithili Bapat, Rami Hijab, Julian Mar- avilla, Neelesh Ramachandran, Elisa Krause, Nagesh Patle, Stephen Chung, Yun- Chieh Lee, Yuqi He, Awani Khodkumbhe, Matthew Tran, Jero Wang, Daniel Endraws, Qiutong Jin, Kevin Lu, Shrey Aeron, Dang Le, Tarik Fawal, Rigoberto Gonzalez-Serrano, Borivoje Nikolić, Ali M. Niknejad, ...

  19. [19]

    In 2024 IEEE Workshop on Crystal-Free/-Less Radio and System-Based Research for IoT (CrystalFreeIoT)

    SCuM-V23: Towards A Crystal-Free System-On-Chip For IoT In 16nm. In 2024 IEEE Workshop on Crystal-Free/-Less Radio and System-Based Research for IoT (CrystalFreeIoT). 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/CrystalFreeIoT62484.2024.00008

    work page doi:10.1109/crystalfreeiot62484.2024.00008 2024

  20. [20]

    Filip Maksimovic, Brad Wheeler, David C. Burnett, Osama Khan, Sahar Mesri, Ioana Suciu, Lydia Lee, Alex Moreno, Arvind Sundararajan, Bob Zhou, Rachel Zoll, Andrew Ng, Tengfei Chang, Xavier Villajosana, Thomas Watteyne, Ali Niknejad, and Kristofer S. J. Pister. 2019. A Crystal-Free Single-Chip Micro Mote with Integrated 802.15.4 Compatible Transceiver, sub...

    work page doi:10.23919/vlsic.2019.8777971 2019

  21. [21]

    Alex Moreno and Kristofer Pister. 2022. Frequency Compensated Crystal-Free 802.15.4 Wireless Radio. In2022 IEEE Sensors. 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ SENSORS52175.2022.9967165 ISSN: 2168-9229

    work page arXiv 2022

  22. [22]

    Nguyen, Ramona Trestian, Duc To, and Mallik Tatipamula

    Huan X. Nguyen, Ramona Trestian, Duc To, and Mallik Tatipamula. 2021. Digital Twin for 5G and Beyond.IEEE Communications Magazine59, 2 (Feb. 2021), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.001.2000343 Conference Name: IEEE Communications Magazine

    work page doi:10.1109/mcom.001.2000343 2021

  23. [23]

    Nordic Semiconductor. 2025. nRF Connect for Desktop. https://www.nordicsemi. com/Products/Development-tools/nRF-Connect-for-Desktop

    2025

  24. [24]

    John Notor, A. L. Caviglia, and Gary B. Levy. 2003. CMOS RFIC ARCHI- TECTURES FOR IEEE 802.15.4 NETWORKS. https://api.semanticscholar.org/ CorpusID:5142660

    2003

  25. [25]

    Masayoshi Oshiro, Tatsuhiko Maruyama, Takashi Tokairin, Yuki Tuda, Tong Wang, Naotaka Koide, Yosuke Ogasawara, Tuan Thanh Ta, Hiroshi Yoshida, and Kenichi Sami. 2016. A 3.2 mA-RX 3.5 mA-TX fully integrated SoC for Bluetooth Low Energy. In2016 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC). 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ASSCC.2016.7844120

    work page doi:10.1109/asscc.2016.7844120 2016

  26. [26]

    Manus Pengnoo, Michael Taynnan Barros, Lunchakorn Wuttisittikulkij, Bernard Butler, Alan Davy, and Sasitharan Balasubramaniam. 2020. Digital Twin for Metasurface Reflector Management in 6G Terahertz Communications.IEEE Access8 (2020), 114580–114596. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3003734 Conference Name: IEEE Access

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2020.3003734 2020

  27. [27]

    PySDR. 2025. PySDR: A Guide to SDR and DSP using Python. https://pysdr.org/

    2025

  28. [28]

    Haziq Rohail and David C. Burnett. 2024. A Tutorial on Frequency Stability Funda- mentals. In2024 IEEE Workshop on Crystal-Free/-Less Radio and System-Based Re- search for IoT (CrystalFreeIoT). 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/CrystalFreeIoT62484. 2024.00005

    work page doi:10.1109/crystalfreeiot62484 2024

  29. [29]

    Pengg, Konstantinos Manetakis, Camilo A

    Nicola Scolari, Franz X. Pengg, Konstantinos Manetakis, Camilo A. Salazar, Alexandre Vouilloz, Ernesto Pérez Serna, Anjana Dissanayake, Pascal Persechini, Vladimir Kopta, Erwan Le Roux, Francesco Chicco, Stefano Cillo, Nicola Gerber, Cédric Barbelenet, Fabio Epifano, Paulo A. Dal Fabbro, and Nicolas Raemy. 2024. 23.2 A 1mm2 Software-Defined Dual-Mode Blue...

    work page doi:10.1109/isscc49657.2024.10454304 2024

  30. [30]

    Yi Shen, Boxuan Chang, Chien-Wei Tseng, Yunfan Wang, Qirui Zhang, Zichen Fan, Zhen Feng, Rahul Narashimha, Andrea Bejarano-Carbo, Hun-Seok Kim, and David Blaauw. 2025. A Crystal-Less Frequency-Modulation Transmitter IC with Joint Neural-Network-Driven Modulation and Coding for Low-Power Connectivity. In2025 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conferen...

    work page doi:10.1109/isscc49661.2025.10904502 2025

  31. [31]

    Masnadi Shirazi, Hossein Miri Lavasani, Mojtaba Sharifzadeh, Yashar Rajavi, Shahriar Mirabbasi, and Mazhareddin Taghivand

    Amir H. Masnadi Shirazi, Hossein Miri Lavasani, Mojtaba Sharifzadeh, Yashar Rajavi, Shahriar Mirabbasi, and Mazhareddin Taghivand. 2017. A 980uW 5.2dB- NF current-reused direct-conversion bluetooth-low-energy receiver in 40nm CMOS. In2017 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference (CICC). 1–4. https: //doi.org/10.1109/CICC.2017.7993647 ISSN: 2152-3630

    work page doi:10.1109/cicc.2017.7993647 2017

  32. [32]

    Bluetooth SIG. 2024. Core Specification (amended). https://www.bluetooth. com/specifications/specs/core-specification-amended-4-2/

    2024

  33. [33]

    Silicon Labs. 2025. Simplicity Connect Mobile App - Silicon Labs. https: //www.silabs.com/developer-tools/simplicity-connect-mobile-app

    2025

  34. [34]

    de Sousa, João Costa Freire, and João Caldinhas Vaz

    Marco Silva-Pereira, José T. de Sousa, João Costa Freire, and João Caldinhas Vaz

  35. [35]

    2019), 332–346

    A 1.7-mW -92-dBm Sensitivity Low-IF Receiver in 0.13-um CMOS for Blue- tooth LE Applications.IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 67, 1 (Jan. 2019), 332–346. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMTT.2018.2876224

    work page doi:10.1109/tmtt.2018.2876224 2019

  36. [36]

    Fengxiao Tang, Xuehan Chen, Tiago Koketsu Rodrigues, Ming Zhao, and Nei Kato. 2022. Survey on Digital Twin Edge Networks (DITEN) Toward 6G.IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society3 (2022), 1360–1381. https://doi. org/10.1109/OJCOMS.2022.3197811 Conference Name: IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society

    work page doi:10.1109/ojcoms.2022.3197811 2022

  37. [37]

    Texas Instruments. 2025. CC2540 data sheet, product information and support | TI.com. https://www.ti.com/product/CC2540

    2025

  38. [38]

    Khosravirad, Antonino Masaracchia, Octavia A

    Dang Van Huynh, Saeed R. Khosravirad, Antonino Masaracchia, Octavia A. Dobre, and Trung Q. Duong. 2022. Edge Intelligence-Based Ultra-Reliable and Low-Latency Communications for Digital Twin-Enabled Metaverse.IEEE Wire- less Communications Letters11, 8 (Aug. 2022), 1733–1737. https://doi.org/10. 1109/LWC.2022.3179207 Conference Name: IEEE Wireless Communi...

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Chen Wang, Yuyang Ding, Chunli Huang, Bo Zhou, Xukun Wang, and Ziyuan Chen. 2025. A High-Robust Low-IF Bluetooth Receiver With Noise Suppression and Offset Elimination Schemes.IEEE Microwave and Wireless Technology Letters (2025), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LMWT.2025.3552775

    work page doi:10.1109/lmwt.2025.3552775 2025

  40. [40]

    Yiwen Wu, Ke Zhang, and Yan Zhang. 2021. Digital Twin Networks: A Survey. IEEE Internet of Things Journal8, 18 (Sept. 2021), 13789–13804. https://doi.org/ 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3079510 Conference Name: IEEE Internet of Things Journal

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3079510 2021

  41. [41]

    Burnett, Lydia Lee, Thomas Watteyne, and Kristofer S.J

    Titan Yuan, Filip Maksimovic, Brad Wheeler, David C. Burnett, Lydia Lee, Thomas Watteyne, and Kristofer S.J. Pister. 2022. A Temperature-Compensated BLE Beacon and 802.15.4-to-BLE Translator on a Crystal-Free Mote. In2021 51st European Microwave Conference (EuMC). 765–768. https://doi.org/10.23919/ EuMC50147.2022.9784300

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Zixuan Zhang, Feng Wen, Zhongda Sun, Xinge Guo, Tianyiyi He, and Chengkuo Lee. 2022. Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Sensing Technologies in the 5G/Internet of Things Era: From Virtual Real- ity/Augmented Reality to the Digital Twin.Advanced Intelligent Systems 4, 7 (2022), 2100228. https://doi.org/10.1002/aisy.202100228 _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wil...

    work page doi:10.1002/aisy.202100228 2022

  43. [43]

    Jiahao Zhao, Yining Zhang, Kunnong Zeng, Woogeun Rhee, and Zhihua Wang

  44. [44]

    IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs68, 4 (April 2021), 1143–1147

    A 2.4-GHz Crystal-Less GFSK Receiver Using an Auxiliary Multiphase BBPLL for Digital Output Demodulation With Enhanced Frequency Scaling. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs68, 4 (April 2021), 1143–1147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCSII.2020.3032149 Conference Name: IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs. 10

    work page doi:10.1109/tcsii.2020.3032149 2021