Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

FASTAR -- II. Semi-resolved evolutionary stellar population models

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-30 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Semi-resolved FASTAR models reproduce stochastic behavior from discretely sampled IMFs.

desk verdict The paper's main advance is making stellar population models depend explicitly on the number of stars to capture stochastic IMF sampling. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.24476 v1 pith:DMHJZLA6 submitted 2026-05-23 astro-ph.GA

Ignacio Martín-Navarro , Alexandre Vazdekis , Luis Peralta de Arriba , Isaac Alonso Asensio , Patricia Iglesias Navarro , Eirini Angeloudi , Francesco La Barbera , Miguel Cerviño
show 7 more authors
Katja Fahrion Tereza Jerabkova Michael A. Beasley Jesús Falcón-Barroso Marc Huertas-Company Sebastián F. Sánchez Prashin Jethwa
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords stellarpopulationsynthesisinitialmassfunctionstochasticsamplingsemi-resolvedmodelsevolutionaryspectralpredictionssimplepopulations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents semi-resolved versions of the FASTAR evolutionary synthesis models that depend on the number of stars contributing to the spectra. This dependence allows the models to capture the stochastic effects that arise when the initial mass function is not fully sampled. Standard models assume a fully sampled IMF, but at high spatial resolutions or low surface brightnesses this assumption breaks down. The new models can produce strong deviations in quantities such as equivalent widths, colors, and mass-to-light ratios compared to fully sampled predictions. They also support sampling-based inference methods over the age range from 20 Myr to 14 Gyr and metallicities from -2.5 to +0.3.

What carries the argument

The number of stars contributing to the observed spectra, which sets the effective sampling of stellar evolutionary phases along the isochrones.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of observed spectra from a star-forming region with a known small number of stars against both semi-resolved and fully sampled model predictions, checking if the semi-resolved version matches the observed scatter better.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Semi-resolved FASTAR predictions reproduce the stochastic behavior of discretely-sampled IMFs by making the models depend on the number of stars contributing to the observed spectra. This incomplete sampling leads to inherent stochasticity, and derived quantities such as equivalent widths, colors, or mass-to-light ratios might present strong deviations compared to standard fully sampled simple stellar population models. The models share the same evolutionary principles as the integral version and are computed efficiently with JAX.

Load-bearing premise

Stochasticity arises solely from the number of stars contributing to the observed spectra, with all other evolutionary principles shared exactly with the fully sampled models.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Derived quantities may show strong deviations from fully sampled models.
  • Stochasticity dilutes the boundary between model predictions and data.
  • New sampling-based inference approaches are promoted.
  • Models enable exploration of parameter space with optimized computation.
  • Coverage includes ages 20 Myr to 14 Gyr and metallicities -2.5 < [M/H] < +0.3.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • High-resolution observations of individual star clusters could test these stochastic predictions directly.
  • The approach might extend to other population synthesis codes facing similar sampling issues.
  • It suggests that some observed scatter in galaxy properties could be due to IMF sampling rather than other variations.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents the semi-resolved version of the FASTAR evolutionary synthesis models. These models reproduce the stochastic behavior of discretely sampled IMFs by conditioning predictions on the number of contributing stars while reusing the identical evolutionary principles, ingredients, isochrones, and features as the integral (fully sampled) FASTAR models. The models span ages 20 Myr–14 Gyr, metallicities −2.5 < [M/H] < +0.3, multiple IMF forms, and deliver spectroscopic predictions over 3540–7400 Å plus SEDs over 2000–12000 Å. Derived quantities such as equivalent widths, colors, and mass-to-light ratios are stated to exhibit strong deviations from standard SSP models due to incomplete phase sampling; the implementation is JAX-optimized for efficient parameter-space exploration.

Significance. If the implementation is shown to correctly recover stochastic IMF sampling without new free parameters or inconsistencies with the integral version, the models would be useful for interpreting high-resolution or low-surface-brightness observations where the fully sampled IMF assumption breaks down. Explicit reuse of the same evolutionary ingredients and the JAX optimization for computational efficiency are clear strengths that support reproducible and extensible work.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the semi-resolved models 'reproduce the stochastic behavior of discretely-sampled IMFs' and produce 'strong deviations' in EWs, colors, and M/L is asserted without any described validation tests, Monte Carlo comparisons, or error budgets; this is load-bearing because the soundness of the construction cannot be assessed from the given description alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. The wavelength range is written as '3,540-7,400 A'; adopt consistent decimal notation throughout the manuscript.
  2. A citation to the companion FASTAR-I paper would help readers locate the integral models whose ingredients are reused.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We are pleased that the referee recognizes the strengths of reusing the same evolutionary ingredients and the JAX optimization. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the semi-resolved models 'reproduce the stochastic behavior of discretely-sampled IMFs' and produce 'strong deviations' in EWs, colors, and M/L is asserted without any described validation tests, Monte Carlo comparisons, or error budgets; this is load-bearing because the soundness of the construction cannot be assessed from the given description alone.

    Authors: The construction of the semi-resolved models reuses the identical evolutionary principles, ingredients, isochrones, and features as the integral FASTAR models. Stochasticity is introduced by conditioning the predictions on the number of contributing stars, which determines the sampling of stellar evolutionary phases. This approach ensures that the models reproduce the stochastic behavior of discretely sampled IMFs by design, without new free parameters. The manuscript provides the implementation details and illustrates the resulting deviations in derived quantities. We agree that the abstract would benefit from a brief reference to this construction and the validation through consistency with the integral models. We will revise the abstract accordingly and ensure the main text includes explicit comparisons to Monte Carlo realizations of discrete IMF sampling. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper defines semi-resolved FASTAR models explicitly as sharing the identical evolutionary ingredients, isochrones, and principles as the integral (fully sampled) FASTAR version, with stochasticity arising solely from conditioning on a finite number of contributing stars. This construction directly implies the claimed reproduction of discretely-sampled IMF behavior and potential deviations in EWs, colors, and M/L ratios; no derivation step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The extension is self-contained against the base framework without load-bearing self-referential loops.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities are introduced beyond those already present in standard stellar population synthesis; the key modeling choice is the domain assumption that stochasticity is fully captured by the number of stars.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Stochastic behavior of discretely-sampled IMFs is determined solely by the number of stars contributing to the observed spectra.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the mechanism that makes the models stochastic.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FASTAR -- II. Semi-resolved evolutionary stellar population models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/DMHJZLA6

@misc{pith2026260524476,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FASTAR -- II. Semi-resolved evolutionary stellar population models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/DMHJZLA6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.24476}
}
read the original abstract

Standard evolutionary synthesis models rely on the assumption of a fully sampled stellar initial mass function (IMF). Under this assumption, the age, chemical composition, and IMF uniquely define the predicted absorption spectra. However, with current instrumentation pushing observations towards higher spatial resolutions and lower surface brightnesses, the assumption of a fully sampled IMF does not always hold true. Here we present the semi-resolved version of the FASTAR models, a comprehensive set of evolutionary synthesis predictions able to reproduce the stochastic behavior of discretely-sampled IMFs. Semi-resolved FASTAR predictions share the same evolutionary principles, ingredients, and features of the integral (fully sampled IMF) version of the FASTAR models, expanding a range of ages from 20 Myr to 14 Gyr, metallicities between -2.5 < [M/H] < +0.3, and several IMF functional forms. Detailed spectroscopic measurements can be carried out within the 3,540-7,400 A wavelength range, and low-resolution spectral energy distributions can also be synthesized over a wider 2,000-to-12,000 A coverage. Semi-resolved FASTAR models also depend on the number of stars contributing to the observed spectra, which determines the effective sampling of the different stellar evolutionary phases along the isochrones. This incomplete sampling implies that semi-resolved FASTAR models are inevitably stochastic. On top of the inherent stochasticity of the models, derived quantities such as equivalent widths, colors, or mass-to-light ratios might present strong deviations compared to standard fully sampled simple stellar population models. This stochasticity dilutes the boundary between model predictions and data, promoting new sampling-based inference approaches. FASTAR semi-resolved models allow for the effective exploration of the parameter space thanks to their optimized, JAX-based computation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.24476 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Stochastic nature of FASTAR semi-resolved predictions. In the left panel, each row shows five random semi-resolved SSP [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Behavior of line-strength indices. From top to bottom, the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Semi-resolved index–index diagrams. Black lines corre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Same as Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Color dependence on the number of stars. Green shaded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Mass-to-light ratio. The measured r-band mass-to-light ratio for a 10 Gyr and solar metallicity population is shown as a function of the number of stars in the semi-resolved FASTAR models. Shaded areas correspond to the 10/90 and 1/99 per￾centiles of the distribution o…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Colors at the Virgo distance. Colored symbols represent [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Isochrone mapping. Both panels represent the predicted [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Predictions for 40-meter-class telescopes. Semi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Pixel-by-Pixel Path to Population III Discovery with JWST

    astro-ph.GA 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Pixel-by-pixel SBI modeling recovers young massive Pop III clumps at up to 90 percent rate in favorable JWST-like configurations while integrated analyses fail due to contamination.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Abraham, R. G. & van Dokkum, P. G. 2014, PASP, 126, 55

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 5

    Alsing, J., Peiris, H., Leja, J., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 5

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    2024, Con- straints on the in situ and ex situ stellar masses in nearby galaxies obtained with artificial intelligence

    Angeloudi, E., Falcón-Barroso, J., Huertas-Company, M., et al. 2024, Con- straints on the in situ and ex situ stellar masses in nearby galaxies obtained with artificial intelligence

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 5408

    Angeloudi, E., Falcón-Barroso, J., Huertas-Company, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5408

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    2025, A&A, 703, A290

    Angeloudi, E., Huertas-Company, M., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A290

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    C., Johnson, L

    Beerman, L. C., Johnson, L. C., Fouesneau, M., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 104

    work page 2012

  7. [7]

    Bell, E. F. & de Jong, R. S. 2001, ApJ, 550, 212

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    F., McIntosh, D

    Bell, E. F., McIntosh, D. H., Katz, N., & Weinberg, M. D. 2003, ApJS, 149, 289

    work page 2003

Show all 80 references
  1. [9]

    & Alloin, D

    Bica, E. & Alloin, D. 1986, A&A, 162, 21

    1986

  2. [10]

    A., et al

    Bittner, A., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Gadotti, D. A., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A65

    2020

  3. [11]

    P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al

    Blakeslee, J. P., Jordán, A., Mei, S., et al. 2009, ApJ, 694, 556

    2009

  4. [12]

    2018, JAX: composable transforma- tions of Python+NumPy programs

    Bradbury, J., Frostig, R., Hawkins, P., et al. 2018, JAX: composable transforma- tions of Python+NumPy programs

    2018

  5. [13]

    Branco, V ., Coelho, P. R. T., Lançon, A., Martins, L. P., & Prugniel, P. 2024, A&A, 687, A142

    2024

  6. [14]

    & Charlot, S

    Bruzual, G. & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000 Bruzual A., G. 2002, in IAU Symposium, V ol. 207, Extragalactic Star Clusters, ed. D. P. Geisler, E. K. Grebel, & D. Minniti, 616

    2003

  7. [15]

    1993, A&A, 275, 433

    Buzzoni, A. 1993, A&A, 275, 433

    1993

  8. [16]

    & Emsellem, E

    Cappellari, M. & Emsellem, E. 2004, PASP, 116, 138

    2004

  9. [17]

    C., McLure, R

    Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

    2018

  10. [18]

    Cervantes, J. L. & Vazdekis, A. 2009, MNRAS, 392, 691 Cerviño, M. 2013, New A Rev., 57, 123 Cerviño, M. & Luridiana, V . 2004, A&A, 413, 145 Cerviño, M. & Luridiana, V . 2006, A&A, 451, 475 Cerviño, M., Luridiana, V ., & Castander, F. J. 2000, A&A, 360, L5 Cerviño, M., Luridia...

    2009

  11. [19]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

    2003

  12. [20]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 393

    Conroy, C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393

    2013

  13. [21]

    & van Dokkum, P

    Conroy, C. & van Dokkum, P. G. 2012, ApJ, 760, 71

    2012

  14. [22]

    & van Dokkum, P

    Conroy, C. & van Dokkum, P. G. 2016, ApJ, 827, 9 da Silva, R. L., Fumagalli, M., & Krumholz, M. 2012, ApJ, 745, 145 De Marchi, G., Paresce, F., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2005, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 327, The Initial Mass Function 50 Years Later, ed. E. Co...

    2016

  15. [23]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168

    2019

  16. [24]

    A., Kreckel, K., et al

    Drory, N., Blanc, G. A., Kreckel, K., et al. 2024, AJ, 168, 198

    2024

  17. [25]

    Eldridge, J. J. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 794 Euclid Collaboration, Mellier, Y ., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2025, A&A, 697, A1 Euclid Collaboration, Urbano, M., Duc, P.-A., et al. 2026, A&A, 707, A229

    2012

  18. [26]

    Faber, S. M. 1972, A&A, 20, 361

    1972

  19. [27]

    M., Friel, E

    Faber, S. M., Friel, E. D., Burstein, D., & Gaskell, C. M. 1985, ApJS, 57, 711 Falcón-Barroso, J., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Vazdekis, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 532, A95

    1985

  20. [28]

    & Lançon, A

    Fouesneau, M. & Lançon, A. 2010, A&A, 521, A22

    2010

  21. [29]

    Fouesneau, M., Lançon, A., Chandar, R., & Whitmore, B. C. 2012, ApJ, 750, 60

    2012

  22. [30]

    J., & Leary, C

    Frostig, R., Johnson, M. J., & Leary, C. 2019, in SysML Conference 2018, Stan- ford, United States

    2019

  23. [31]

    R., Román, J., & Trujillo, I

    Golini, G., Montes, M., Carrasco, E. R., Román, J., & Trujillo, I. 2024, A&A, 684, A99

    2024

  24. [32]

    & Melchior, P

    Hahn, C. & Melchior, P. 2022, ApJ, 938, 11

    2022

  25. [33]

    L., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., et al

    Hidalgo, S. L., Pietrinferni, A., Cassisi, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 856, 125

    2018

  26. [34]

    H., & Pernet, E

    Iglesias-Navarro, P., Huertas-Company, M., Martín-Navarro, I., Knapen, J. H., & Pernet, E. 2024, A&A, 689, A58

    2024

  27. [35]

    2025, A&A, 703, A229 Ivezi´c, Ž., Kahn, S

    Iglesias-Navarro, P., Huertas-Company, M., Pérez-González, P., et al. 2025, A&A, 703, A229 Ivezi´c, Ž., Kahn, S. M., Tyson, J. A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 873, 111

    2025

  28. [36]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22

    2021

  29. [37]

    J., Zaritsky, D., Sandoval Ascencio, L., Cooper, M

    Khim, D. J., Zaritsky, D., Sandoval Ascencio, L., Cooper, M. C., & Donnerstein, R. 2025, ApJ, 989, 154

    2025

  30. [38]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231

    2001

  31. [39]

    R., Fumagalli, M., da Silva, R

    Krumholz, M. R., Fumagalli, M., da Silva, R. L., Rendahl, T., & Parra, J. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 1447

    2015

  32. [40]

    2010, MNRAS, 408, 97 La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., Ferreras, I., et al

    Kuntschner, H., Emsellem, E., Bacon, R., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 97 La Barbera, F., Vazdekis, A., Ferreras, I., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 4090

    2010

  33. [41]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3

    1999

  34. [42]

    D., Liu, Q., Eadie, G

    Li, D. D., Liu, Q., Eadie, G. M., et al. 2025, ApJ, 986, L18

    2025

  35. [43]

    2005, MNRAS, 362, 799

    Maraston, C. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 799

    2005

  36. [44]

    E., Spavone, M., et al

    Martin, G., Bazkiaei, A. E., Spavone, M., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 1459 Martín-Navarro, I., Pinna, F., Coccato, L., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A59 Martín-Navarro, I. & Vazdekis, A. 2024, A&A, 691, L10 Martínez-Delgado, D., Stein, M., Sakowska, J. D., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A182

    2022

  37. [45]

    McGaugh, S. S. & Schombert, J. M. 2014, AJ, 148, 77 Mészáros, S., Bohlin, R., Allende Prieto, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A197

    2014

  38. [46]

    C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J

    Mihos, J. C., Harding, P., Feldmeier, J. J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 16

    2017

  39. [47]

    2020, A&A, 637, A56

    Neumann, J., Fragkoudi, F., Pérez, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A56

    2020

  40. [48]

    2006, MNRAS, 365, 74

    Ocvirk, P., Pichon, C., Lançon, A., & Thiébaut, E. 2006, MNRAS, 365, 74

    2006

  41. [49]

    2022, MNRAS, 509, 522

    Orozco-Duarte, R., Wofford, A., Vidal-García, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 522

    2022

  42. [50]

    1998, MNRAS, 299, 877

    Pelat, D. 1998, MNRAS, 299, 877

    1998

  43. [51]

    Pickles, A. J. 1985, ApJ, 296, 340

    1985

  44. [52]

    2021, ApJ, 908, 102

    Pietrinferni, A., Hidalgo, S., Cassisi, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 908, 102

    2021

  45. [53]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 2065

    Pietrinferni, A., Salaris, M., Cassisi, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 2065

    2024

  46. [54]

    2019, A&A, 623, A19

    Pinna, F., Falcón-Barroso, J., Martig, M., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A19

    2019

  47. [55]

    1998, AJ, 115, 2459

    Renzini, A. 1998, AJ, 115, 2459

    1998

  48. [56]

    Robotham, A. S. G. & Bellstedt, S. 2025, RAS Techniques and Instruments, 4, rzaf019 Rodríguez-Beltrán, P., Vazdekis, A., Cerviño, M., & Beasley, M. A. 2021, MN- RAS, 507, 3005

    2025

  49. [57]

    Roediger, J. C. & Courteau, S. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3209 Sánchez, S. F., Mejía-Narváez, A., Egorov, O. V ., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 52 Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Peletier, R. F., Jiménez-Vicente, J., et al. 2006, MNRAS, 371, 703

    2015

  50. [58]

    Schiavon, R. P. 2007, ApJS, 171, 146

    2007

  51. [59]

    A., Copetti, M

    Schmidt, A. A., Copetti, M. V . F., Alloin, D., & Jablonka, P. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 766

    1991

  52. [60]

    Spiniello, C., Trager, S., Koopmans, L. V . E., & Conroy, C. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1483

    2014

  53. [61]

    & Taylor, B

    Spinrad, H. & Taylor, B. J. 1971, ApJS, 22, 445

    1971

  54. [62]

    Stanway, E. R. & Eldridge, J. J. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 4430

    2023

  55. [63]

    Strom, K. M. & Strom, S. E. 1978, AJ, 83, 73

    1978

  56. [64]

    2003, MNRAS, 339, 897

    Thomas, D., Maraston, C., & Bender, R. 2003, MNRAS, 339, 897

    2003

  57. [65]

    2005, ApJ, 621, 673

    Thomas, D., Maraston, C., Bender, R., & Mendes de Oliveira, C. 2005, ApJ, 621, 673

    2005

  58. [66]

    Tinsley, B. M. & Gunn, J. E. 1976, ApJ, 203, 52

    1976

  59. [67]

    & Schneider, D

    Tonry, J. & Schneider, D. P. 1988, AJ, 96, 807

    1988

  60. [68]

    L., Dressler, A., Blakeslee, J

    Tonry, J. L., Dressler, A., Blakeslee, J. P., et al. 2001, ApJ, 546, 681

    2001

  61. [69]

    C., Worthey, G., Faber, S

    Trager, S. C., Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., Burstein, D., & Gonzalez, J. J. 1998, ApJS, 116, 1

    1998

  62. [70]

    2021, A&A, 654, A40

    Trujillo, I., D’Onofrio, M., Zaritsky, D., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A40

    2021

  63. [71]

    & Fliri, J

    Trujillo, I. & Fliri, J. 2016, ApJ, 823, 123 van Dokkum, P. G., Abraham, R., Merritt, A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 798, L45

    2016

  64. [72]

    F., & Beckman, J

    Vazdekis, A., Casuso, E., Peletier, R. F., & Beckman, J. E. 1996, ApJS, 106, 307

    1996

  65. [73]

    Vazdekis, A., Cerviño, M., Montes, M., Martín-Navarro, I., & Beasley, M. A. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 5131

    2020

  66. [74]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 1177

    Vazdekis, A., Coelho, P., Cassisi, S., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 1177

    2015

  67. [75]

    2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639

    Vazdekis, A., Sánchez-Blázquez, P., Falcón-Barroso, J., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 404, 1639

    2010

  68. [76]

    1994, ApJS, 95, 107

    Worthey, G. 1994, ApJS, 95, 107

    1994

  69. [77]

    M., & Gonzalez, J

    Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., & Gonzalez, J. J. 1992, ApJ, 398, 69

    1992

  70. [78]

    M., Gonzalez, J

    Worthey, G., Faber, S. M., Gonzalez, J. J., & Burstein, D. 1994, ApJS, 94, 687

    1994

  71. [79]

    & Lee, H.-c

    Worthey, G. & Lee, H.-c. 2011, ApJS, 193, 1

    2011

  72. [80]

    Zibetti, S., Charlot, S., & Rix, H.-W. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 1181 Article number, page 12 Martín-Navarro et al.: FASTAR II Appendix A: Y oung semi-resolved populations 2 4 6 log Nstars 2 4 6 8 10H 0 [Å] 0.4 Gyr 2 Gyr 1/99 percentile 10/90 percentile Median 2 4 6 log Nstars 0 2 4 6...

    2009

Pith tools

Reviewed June 30, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.