pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.25976 · v1 · pith:HYM4WX65new · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🧮 math.AG · math.RT

Semiorthogonal decompositions for stacks

Chenjing Bu , Tudor P\u{a}durariu , Yukinobu Toda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AG math.RT
keywords semiorthogonal decompositionsderived categoriescoherent sheavesalgebraic stackscomponent latticeparabolic inductionmoduli stacksDonaldson-Thomas theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasi-smooth derived algebraic stacks admit semiorthogonal decompositions of coherent sheaf categories indexed by the component lattice with parabolic induction inclusions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper gives a construction that splits the derived category of coherent sheaves on a quasi-smooth derived algebraic stack over the complex numbers into summands labeled by the stack's component lattice. Each summand consists of objects satisfying a weight condition, and the functors embedding these summands into the full category are realized by parabolic induction. The same construction applies uniformly to several moduli stacks arising in the study of reductive groups, including those of semistable G-bundles, G-Higgs bundles, de Rham local systems, and Betti local systems on a curve. A reader would care because the resulting decompositions organize the category in a way that separates contributions according to a combinatorial invariant already central to Donaldson-Thomas theory.

Core claim

For any quasi-smooth derived algebraic stack over ℂ the derived category of coherent sheaves admits a semiorthogonal decomposition whose direct summands are the full subcategories of objects of fixed weight with respect to the component lattice of the stack; the inclusion of each summand is realized by the parabolic induction functor associated to that lattice element.

What carries the argument

The component lattice of the stack, which indexes the weight-conditioned subcategories whose inclusions are supplied by parabolic induction.

If this is right

  • The construction produces semiorthogonal decompositions for moduli stacks of semistable G-bundles on a curve.
  • The same decompositions exist for moduli stacks of G-Higgs bundles, de Rham G-local systems, and Betti G-local systems on a curve.
  • The decompositions apply to reductive groups G that need not be of type A.
  • The indexing set for every such decomposition is the component lattice of the stack.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The decompositions may allow Donaldson-Thomas invariants of these stacks to be computed by summing invariants of the individual weight summands.
  • The method supplies a uniform way to compare categories of bundles, Higgs bundles, and local systems through their common component-lattice indexing.
  • If the component lattice can be defined more broadly, the same weight-and-parabolic-induction pattern may produce decompositions on stacks that are not quasi-smooth.

Load-bearing premise

The component lattice of any quasi-smooth derived algebraic stack is well-defined and supplies an indexing set for which weight conditions produce subcategories admitting parabolic induction as the required inclusion functors.

What would settle it

For the moduli stack of semistable G-bundles on a curve with G a reductive group of type not A, compute the number of indecomposable summands in the derived category and check whether it equals the rank of the component lattice and whether the inclusions match parabolic induction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.25976 by Chenjing Bu, Tudor P\u{a}durariu, Yukinobu Toda.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: An example of cocharacter and character lattices. represent the cocharacter and character lattices, Λ𝑇 = Hom(Gm,𝑇 ) and Λ 𝑇 = Hom(𝑇 , Gm), and the four weights are marked with crosses. On the left, the lines are the hyperplanes dual to the weights. On the right, the lattice Λ 𝑇 is partitioned into infinitely many parts: the weight polytope ∇𝑉 , which is the Minkowski sum 1 2 P 𝑣 [0, 𝑣] over the four weight… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We give a systematic construction of semiorthogonal decompositions of derived categories of coherent sheaves on quasi-smooth derived algebraic stacks over $\mathbb{C}$, where the summands are subcategories defined by weight conditions, and the inclusion functors are given by parabolic induction. The summands are indexed by the component lattice of the stack, a central combinatorial structure in intrinsic Donaldson-Thomas theory. As examples, we obtain semiorthogonal decompositions for moduli stacks of semistable $G$-bundles or $G$-Higgs bundles on a curve, and moduli stacks of de Rham or Betti $G$-local systems on a curve, for reductive groups $G$ not necessarily of type A.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to give a systematic construction of semiorthogonal decompositions of the derived categories of coherent sheaves on quasi-smooth derived algebraic stacks over ℂ. The summands are subcategories defined by weight conditions indexed by the component lattice of the stack, with inclusion functors provided by parabolic induction. Examples are given for moduli stacks of semistable G-bundles or G-Higgs bundles on a curve, and moduli stacks of de Rham or Betti G-local systems on a curve, for reductive groups G not necessarily of type A.

Significance. If the construction holds, the result would supply a general method for producing semiorthogonal decompositions on derived algebraic stacks, directly tying the component lattice from intrinsic Donaldson-Thomas theory to the structure of D^b(Coh). The explicit treatment of examples for reductive groups outside type A strengthens the claim of generality and could serve as a template for further applications in moduli theory.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (component lattice definition): the manuscript must show explicitly that the component lattice is intrinsically defined for arbitrary quasi-smooth stacks and that the associated weight subcategories admit parabolic induction as fully faithful inclusions yielding vanishing Homs between distinct summands; this verification is load-bearing for the systematic claim and is currently left implicit.
  2. [§4] §4 (main construction): the proof that the collection of weight subcategories forms a semiorthogonal decomposition (i.e., that the sum of the inclusions is an equivalence) must be supplied in full generality, including the argument that every object decomposes according to the lattice; without this step the central claim remains unverified.
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the weight functors and the parabolic induction maps could be introduced with a short running example before the general statements.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states the result clearly but would benefit from a single sentence indicating the key technical tool (parabolic induction) used to realize the inclusions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and for identifying the need for greater explicitness in the foundational arguments. We agree that the component lattice and the semiorthogonality proof require more detailed verification to support the systematic claim, and we will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (component lattice definition): the manuscript must show explicitly that the component lattice is intrinsically defined for arbitrary quasi-smooth stacks and that the associated weight subcategories admit parabolic induction as fully faithful inclusions yielding vanishing Homs between distinct summands; this verification is load-bearing for the systematic claim and is currently left implicit.

    Authors: We agree that the verification in §3 is presented too concisely. The component lattice is defined intrinsically via the connected components of the derived inertia stack (or equivalently via the DT theory of the quasi-smooth stack), independent of any atlas. Parabolic induction is constructed using the natural maps from the parabolic subgroups associated to the lattice elements. We will expand §3 with a self-contained lemma proving that these functors are fully faithful, that Hom spaces between distinct weight subcategories vanish by the weight filtration properties, and that the construction works for any quasi-smooth derived algebraic stack over ℂ. This will be added as a new subsection with complete arguments. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (main construction): the proof that the collection of weight subcategories forms a semiorthogonal decomposition (i.e., that the sum of the inclusions is an equivalence) must be supplied in full generality, including the argument that every object decomposes according to the lattice; without this step the central claim remains unverified.

    Authors: The proof of the main theorem in §4 relies on the semiorthogonality established in §3 together with the fact that every object in D^b(Coh(X)) admits a unique filtration whose graded pieces lie in the weight subcategories, which follows from the quasi-smoothness assumption and the completeness of the component lattice. We acknowledge that the argument for essential surjectivity (i.e., that the sum of the inclusions is an equivalence) is only sketched. We will rewrite the proof of Theorem 4.1 to include a complete step-by-step verification: first the vanishing of cross-Homs, then the existence of the weight decomposition for arbitrary coherent complexes via the intrinsic lattice, and finally the equivalence statement. The revised proof will be self-contained and will not rely on external references for the decomposition step. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; construction is direct and self-contained

full rationale

The abstract and context describe a systematic construction of semiorthogonal decompositions indexed by the component lattice from intrinsic DT theory, with summands defined by weight conditions and inclusions via parabolic induction. No quotes or equations are available showing any reduction of the main result to fitted parameters, self-definitions, or load-bearing self-citations that collapse the claim. The derivation is treated as independent per the default expectation for such papers.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based on abstract only; the construction rests on standard properties of derived categories and parabolic induction in the theory of reductive groups and stacks.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Quasi-smooth derived algebraic stacks over ℂ admit well-defined derived categories of coherent sheaves that support weight conditions and parabolic induction.
    Invoked as the setting for the semiorthogonal decompositions.
  • domain assumption The component lattice of the stack indexes the summands in a manner compatible with the weight subcategories.
    Central combinatorial structure used for indexing.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5647 in / 1297 out tokens · 33118 ms · 2026-06-29T20:27:29.533403+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 79 canonical work pages · 34 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Good Moduli Spaces in Derived Algebraic Geometry

    Ahlqvist, E., Hekking, J., Pernice, M., and Savvas, M.,Good moduli spaces in derived algebraic geometry, preprint v1 (28 Sept. 2023), arXiv:2309.16574v1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Alper, J.,Good moduli spaces for Artin stacks, Ann. Inst. Fourier, 63.6 (2013), 2349–2402. doi: 10.5802/aif.2833, arXiv:0804.2242

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5802/aif.2833 2013

  3. [3]

    Alper, J., Hall, J., and Rydh, D.,A Luna étale slice theorem for algebraic stacks, Ann. Math. 191.3 (2020), 675–738. doi:10.4007/annals.2020.191.3.1, arXiv:1504.06467

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2020.191.3.1 2020

  4. [4]

    2025), arXiv:1912.06162v4

    Alper, J., Hall, J., and Rydh, D.,The étale local structure of algebraic stacks, preprint v4 (3 Apr. 2025), arXiv:1912.06162v4

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Alper, J., Halpern-Leistner, D., and Heinloth, J.,Existence of moduli spaces for algebraic stacks, Invent. Math. 234.3 (2023), 949–1038. doi:10.1007/s00222-023-01214-4, arXiv:1812.01128

    work page doi:10.1007/s00222-023-01214-4 2023

  6. [6]

    Arinkin, D

    Arinkin, D., Beraldo, D., Campbell, J., Chen, L., Færgeman, J., Gaitsgory, D., Lin, K., Raskin, S., and Rozenblyum, N.,Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture. II: Kac–Moody localization and the FLE, preprint v3 (11 Sept. 2024), arXiv:2405.03648v3

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Arinkin, D

    Arinkin, D., Beraldo, D., Chen, L., Færgeman, J., Gaitsgory, D., Lin, K., Raskin, S., and Rozenblyum, N.,Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture. IV: Ambidexterity, preprint v1 (13 Sept. 2024), arXiv:2409.08670v1

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Arinkin, D., and Gaitsgory, D.,Singular support of coherent sheaves and the geometric Langlands conjecture, Sel. Math. 21.1 (2015), 1–199. doi:10.1007/s00029-014-0167-5, arXiv:1201.6343

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00029-014-0167-5 2015

  9. [9]

    F.,Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles, Trans

    Atiyah, M. F.,Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 85 (1957), 181–207. doi:10.2307/1992969

    work page doi:10.2307/1992969 1957

  10. [10]

    Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients and derived categories

    Ballard, M., Favero, D., and Katzarkov, L.,Variation of geometric invariant theory quotients and derived categories, J. Reine Angew. Math. 746 (2019), 235–303. doi:10.1515/crelle-2015-0096, arXiv:1203.6643

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1515/crelle-2015-0096 2019

  11. [11]

    Behrend, K.,Donaldson–Thomas type invariants via microlocal geometry, Ann. Math. 170.3 (2009), 1307–1338. doi:10.4007/annals.2009.170.1307, arXiv:math/0507523

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4007/annals.2009.170.1307 2009

  12. [12]

    uchicago

    Beilinson, A., and Drinfeld, V.,Quantization of Hitchin’s integrable system and Hecke eigen- sheaves, unpublished manuscript,https :// math . uchicago . edu / ~drinfeld / langlands / QuantizationHitchin.pdf

  13. [13]

    Ben-Bassat, O., Brav, C., Bussi, V., and Joyce, D.,A ‘Darboux theorem’ for shifted symplectic struc- tures on derived Artin stacks, with applications, Geom. Topol. 19.3 (2015), 1287–1359. doi:10.2140/ gt.2015.19.1287, arXiv:1312.0090

    work page arXiv 2015

  14. [14]

    Ben-Zvi, D., and Nadler, D.,Betti geometric Langlands, inAlgebraic geometry: Salt Lake City 2015 (Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 97.2; Clay Mathematics Institute, 2018), 3–41, arXiv:1606.08523

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  15. [15]

    Ben-Zvi, D., Nadler, D., and Preygel, A.,Integral transforms for coherent sheaves, J. Eur. Math. Soc. 19.12 (2017), 3763–3812. doi:10.4171/jems/753, arXiv:1312.7164

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/753 2017

  16. [16]

    Bu, C., Davison, B., Ibáñez Núñez, A., Kinjo, T., and Pădurariu, T.,Cohomology of symmetric stacks, preprint v2 (31 May 2025), arXiv:2502.04253v2

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    I: Component lattices of stacks, preprint v2 (11 Sept

    Bu, C., Halpern-Leistner, D., Ibáñez Núñez, A., and Kinjo, T.,Intrinsic Donaldson–Thomas theory. I: Component lattices of stacks, preprint v2 (11 Sept. 2025), arXiv:2502.13892v2. 60

    work page arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    II: Stability measures and invariants, preprint v1 (27 Feb

    Bu, C., Ibáñez Núñez, A., and Kinjo, T.,Intrinsic Donaldson–Thomas theory. II: Stability measures and invariants, preprint v1 (27 Feb. 2025), arXiv:2502.20515v1

    work page arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    III: Wall-crossing and applications, in preparation

    Bu, C., Ibáñez Núñez, A., and Kinjo, T.,Intrinsic Donaldson–Thomas theory. III: Wall-crossing and applications, in preparation

  20. [20]

    Calaque, D.,Shifted cotangent stacks are shifted symplectic, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse, Math. 28.1 (2019), 67–90. doi:10.5802/afst.1593, arXiv:1612.08101

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5802/afst.1593 2019

  21. [21]

    Proof of the geometric langlands conjecture iii: compatibility with parabolic induction

    Campbell, J., Chen, L., Færgeman, J., Gaitsgory, D., Lin, K., Raskin, S., and Rozenblyum, N.,Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture. III: Compatibility with parabolic induction, preprint v1 (11 Sept. 2024), arXiv:2409.07051v1

    work page arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Reine Angew

    Davison, B.,The integrality conjecture and the cohomology of preprojective stacks, J. Reine Angew. Math. 804 (2023), 105–154. doi:10.1515/crelle-2023-0065, arXiv:1602.02110

    work page doi:10.1515/crelle-2023-0065 2023

  23. [23]

    Davison, B., and Meinhardt, S.,Cohomological Donaldson–Thomas theory of a quiver with po- tential and quantum enveloping algebras, Invent. Math. 221.3 (2020), 777–871. doi:10 . 1007 / s00222-020-00961-y, arXiv:1601.02479

    work page arXiv 2020

  24. [24]

    Donagi, R., and Pantev, T.,Langlands duality for Hitchin systems, Invent. Math. 189.3 (2012), 653–

    2012

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1007/s00222-012-0373-8, arXiv:math/0604617

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00222-012-0373-8

  26. [26]

    Ignition and burn , ISBN=

    Donaldson, S. K., and Thomas, R. P.,Gauge theory in higher dimensions, inThe geometric universe: Science, geometry, and the work of Roger Penrose(Oxford University Press, 1998), 31–47. doi:10 .1093/oso/9780198500599.003.0003

    work page arXiv 1998

  27. [27]

    Drinfeld, V., and Gaitsgory, D.,On some finiteness questions for algebraic stacks, Geom. Funct. Anal. 23.1 (2013), 149–294. doi:10.1007/s00039-012-0204-5, arXiv:1108.5351

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00039-012-0204-5 2013

  28. [28]

    On a theorem of Braden

    Drinfeld, V., and Gaitsgory, D.,On a theorem of Braden, Transform. Groups, 19.2 (2014), 313–358. doi:10.1007/s00031-014-9267-8, arXiv:1308.3786

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s00031-014-9267-8 2014

  29. [29]

    Drinfeld, V., and Gaitsgory, D.,Compact generation of the category of D-modules on the stack of G-bundles on a curve, Camb. J. Math. 3.1–2 (2015), 19–125. doi:10.4310/cjm.2015.v3.n1.a2

    work page doi:10.4310/cjm.2015.v3.n1.a2 2015

  30. [30]

    Cohomological Hall algebra of a symmetric quiver

    Efimov, A. I.,Cohomological Hall algebra of a symmetric quiver, Compos. Math. 148.4 (2012), 1133–1146. doi:10.1112/s0010437x12000152, arXiv:1103.2736

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1112/s0010437x12000152 2012

  31. [31]

    I.,Cyclic homology of categories of matrix factorizations, Int

    Efimov, A. I.,Cyclic homology of categories of matrix factorizations, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2018.12 (2018), 3834–3869. doi:10.1093/imrn/rnw332, arXiv:1212.2859

    work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnw332 2018

  32. [32]

    Descent theory for semiorthogonal decompositions

    Elagin, A. D.,Descent theory for semiorthogonal decompositions, Sb. Math. 203.5 (2012), 645–676. doi:10.1070/sm2012v203n05abeh004238, arXiv:1206.2881

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1070/sm2012v203n05abeh004238 2012

  33. [33]

    2 Laurent Fargues and Jean-Marc Fontaine

    Emerton, M., Gee, T., and Hellmann, E.,An introduction to the categorical𝑝-adic Langlands pro- gram, preprint v1 (4 Oct. 2022), arXiv:2210.01404v1

    work page arXiv 2022

  34. [34]

    Fernandez Herrero, A.,On automorphisms of semistable𝐺-bundles with decorations, Adv. Geom. 23.3 (2023), 389–400. doi:10.1515/advgeom-2023-0016, arXiv:2202.13360

    work page doi:10.1515/advgeom-2023-0016 2023

  35. [35]

    Gaitsgory, D.,Ind-coherent sheaves, Mosc. Math. J. 13.3 (2013), 399–528. doi:10 . 17323 / 1609 -4514-2013-13-3-399-528, arXiv:1105.4857

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  36. [36]

    Proof of the geometric langlands conjecture i: construction of the functor

    Gaitsgory, D., and Raskin, S.,Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture. I: Construction of the functor, preprint v3 (30 Sept. 2025), arXiv:2405.03599v3

    work page arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Proof of the geometric langlands conjecture v: the multiplicity one theorem

    Gaitsgory, D., and Raskin, S.,Proof of the geometric Langlands conjecture. V: The multiplicity one theorem, preprint v3 (16 Jan. 2026), arXiv:2409.09856v3. 61

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [38]

    Gaitsgory, D., and Rozenblyum, N.,Crystals and D-modules, Pure Appl. Math. Q. 10.1 (2014), 57–

    2014

  39. [39]

    doi:10.4310/pamq.2014.v10.n1.a2, arXiv:1111.2087

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/pamq.2014.v10.n1.a2 2014

  40. [40]

    Volume I: Correspond- ences and duality(Math

    Gaitsgory, D., and Rozenblyum, N.,A study in derived algebraic geometry. Volume I: Correspond- ences and duality(Math. Surv. Monogr. 221.1; American Mathematical Society, 2017). doi:10 .1090/surv/221.1

    2017

  41. [41]

    2022), arXiv:1411.0627v5

    Halpern-Leistner, D.,On the structure of instability in moduli theory, preprint v5 (4 Feb. 2022), arXiv:1411.0627v5

    work page arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    Halpern-Leistner, D.,The derived category of a GIT quotient, J. Am. Math. Soc. 28.3 (2015), 871–

    2015

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-2014-00815-8, arXiv:1203.0276

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-2014-00815-8 2014

  44. [44]

    Halpern-Leistner, D.,DerivedΘ-stratifications and the𝐷-equivalence conjecture, preprint v2 (18 June 2021), arXiv:2010.01127v2

    work page arXiv 2021

  45. [45]

    Halpern-Leistner, D., and Pomerleano, D.,Equivariant Hodge theory and noncommutative geo- metry, Geom. Topol. 24.5 (2020), 2361–2433. doi:10.2140/gt.2020.24.2361, arXiv:1507.01924

    work page doi:10.2140/gt.2020.24.2361 2020

  46. [46]

    Halpern-Leistner, D., and Sam, S.,Combinatorial constructions of derived equivalences, J. Am. Math. Soc. 33.3 (2020), 735–773. doi:10.1090/jams/940, arXiv:1601.02030

    work page doi:10.1090/jams/940 2020

  47. [47]

    2025), arXiv: 2509.21298v3

    Hennecart, L., and Kinjo, T.,The BPS decomposition theorem, preprint v3 (11 Dec. 2025), arXiv: 2509.21298v3

    work page arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    and Holstein, J

    Hennion, B., Holstein, J., and Robalo, M.,Gluing invariants of Donaldson–Thomas type. I: The Darboux stack, preprint v2 (25 Mar. 2025), arXiv:2407.08471v2

    work page arXiv 2025

  49. [49]

    and Holstein, J

    Hennion, B., Holstein, J., and Robalo, M.,Gluing invariants of Donaldson–Thomas type. II: Matrix factorizations, preprint v1 (19 Mar. 2025), arXiv:2503.15198v1

    work page arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Phases Of N=2 Theories In 1+1 Dimensions With Boundary

    Herbst, M., Hori, K., and Page, D.,Phases ofN=2theories in1+1dimensions with boundary, preprint v1 (14 Mar. 2008), arXiv:0803.2045v1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  51. [51]

    Exact Results In Two-Dimensional (2,2) Supersymmetric Gauge Theories With Boundary

    Hori, K., and Romo, M.,Exact results in two-dimensional(2,2)supersymmetric gauge theories with boundary, preprint v1 (11 Aug. 2013), arXiv:1308.2438v1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  52. [52]

    2023), arXiv:2311.18050v1

    Ibáñez Núñez, A.,Refined Harder–Narasimhan filtrations in moduli theory, preprint v1 (29 Nov. 2023), arXiv:2311.18050v1

    work page arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Joyce, D., and Song, Y.,A theory of generalized Donaldson–Thomas invariants(Mem. Am. Math. Soc. 1020; American Mathematical Society, 2012). doi:10 . 1090 / s0065 - 9266 - 2011 - 00630 - 1, arXiv:0810.5645

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  54. [54]

    Topological Field Theory, Higher Categories, and Their Applications

    Kapustin, A.,Topological field theory, higher categories, and their applications, inProceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians 2010. Volume III(Hindustan Book Agency, 2011), 2021–2043, arXiv:1004.2307

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  55. [55]

    Electric-Magnetic Duality And The Geometric Langlands Program

    Kapustin, A., and Witten, E.,Electric–magnetic duality and the geometric Langlands program, Commun. Number Theory Phys. 1.1 (2007), 1–236. doi:10.4310/cntp.2007.v1.n1.a1, arXiv: hep-th/0604151

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/cntp.2007.v1.n1.a1 2007

  56. [56]

    R.,Instability in invariant theory, Ann

    Kempf, G. R.,Instability in invariant theory, Ann. Math. 108 (1978), 299–316. doi:10 . 2307 / 1971168

    1978

  57. [57]

    Stability structures, motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants and cluster transformations

    Kontsevich, M., and Soibelman, Y.,Stability structures, motivic Donaldson–Thomas invariants and cluster transformations, preprint v1 (16 Nov. 2008), arXiv:0811.2435v1. 62

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [58]

    Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants

    Kontsevich, M., and Soibelman, Y.,Cohomological Hall algebra, exponential Hodge structures and motivic Donaldson–Thomas invariants, Commun. Number Theory Phys. 5.2 (2011), 231–352. doi: 10.4310/cntp.2011.v5.n2.a1, arXiv:1006.2706

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.4310/cntp.2011.v5.n2.a1 2011

  59. [59]

    Kuznetsov, A.,Base change for semiorthogonal decompositions, Compos. Math. 147.3 (2011), 852–

    2011

  60. [60]

    doi:10.1112/s0010437x10005166, arXiv:0711.1734

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1112/s0010437x10005166

  61. [61]

    Luna, D.,Adhérences d’orbite et invariants, Invent. Math. 29 (1975), 231–238. doi:10 . 1007 / bf01389851

    1975

  62. [62]

    Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory, I

    Maulik, D., Nekrasov, N., Okounkov, A., and Pandharipande, R.,Gromov–Witten theory and Donaldson–Thomas theory. I, Compos. Math. 142.5 (2006), 1263–1285. doi:10 . 1112 / s0010437x06002302, arXiv:math/0312059

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  63. [63]

    Gromov-Witten theory and Donaldson-Thomas theory, II

    Maulik, D., Nekrasov, N., Okounkov, A., and Pandharipande, R.,Gromov–Witten theory and Donaldson–Thomas theory. II, Compos. Math. 142.5 (2006), 1286–1304. doi:10 . 1112 / s0010437x06002314, arXiv:math/0406092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  64. [64]

    Morse decomposition for D-module categories on stacks

    McGerty, K., and Nevins, T.,Morse decomposition for D-module categories on stacks, preprint v1 (28 Feb. 2014), arXiv:1402.7365v1

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  65. [65]

    Olsson, M.,Algebraic spaces and stacks(Colloq. Publ. 62; American Mathematical Society, 2016). doi:10.1090/coll/062

    work page doi:10.1090/coll/062 2016

  66. [66]

    Triangulated categories of singularities and equivalences between Landau-Ginzburg models

    Orlov, D. O.,Triangulated categories of singularities and equivalences between Landau–Ginzburg models, Sb. Math. 197.12 (2006), 1827–1840. doi:10 . 1070 / sm2006v197n12abeh003824, arXiv: math/0503630

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  67. [67]

    Pădurariu, T.,Generators for Hall algebras of surfaces, Math. Z. 303 (2022), 4, 24 pp. doi:10.1007/ s00209-022-03158-6, arXiv:2106.05176

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Pădurariu, T.,Categorical and K-theoretic Hall algebras for quivers with potential, J. Inst. Math. Jussieu, 22.6 (2023), 2717–2747. doi:10.1017/s1474748022000111, arXiv:2107.13642

    work page doi:10.1017/s1474748022000111 2023

  69. [69]

    Pădurariu, T.,Generators for K-theoretic Hall algebras of quivers with potential, Sel. Math. 30 (2024), 4. doi:10.1007/s00029-023-00891-6, arXiv:2108.07919

    work page doi:10.1007/s00029-023-00891-6 2024

  70. [70]

    I, Duke Math

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Categorical and K-theoretic Donaldson–Thomas theory ofC 3. I, Duke Math. J. 173.10 (2024), 1973–2038. doi:10.1215/00127094-2023-0048, arXiv:2207.01899

    work page doi:10.1215/00127094-2023-0048 2024

  71. [71]

    II, Forum Math

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Categorical and K-theoretic Donaldson–Thomas theory ofC 3. II, Forum Math. Sigma, 11 (2023), e108, 47 pp. doi:10.1017/fms.2023.103, arXiv:2209.05920

    work page doi:10.1017/fms.2023.103 2023

  72. [72]

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Quasi-BPS categories for symmetric quivers with potential, Compos. Math. 161.8 (2025), 1799–1854. doi:10.1112/s0010437x25007183, arXiv:2309.08425

    work page doi:10.1112/s0010437x25007183 2025

  73. [73]

    2024), arXiv:2309.08432v2

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Topological K-theory of quasi-BPS categories of symmetric quivers with potential, preprint v2 (17 Aug. 2024), arXiv:2309.08432v2

    work page arXiv 2024

  74. [74]

    Pi, 14 (2026), e11, 69 pp

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Quasi-BPS categories for𝐾3surfaces, Forum Math. Pi, 14 (2026), e11, 69 pp. doi:10.1017/fmp.2025.10021, arXiv:2309.08437

    work page doi:10.1017/fmp.2025.10021 2026

  75. [75]

    2024), arXiv:2408.02168v1

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Quasi-BPS categories for Higgs bundles, preprint v1 (4 Aug. 2024), arXiv:2408.02168v1

    work page arXiv 2024

  76. [76]

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,Topological K-theory of quasi-BPS categories for Higgs bundles, J. Topol. 18.4 (2025), e70049, 72 pp. doi:10.1112/topo.70049, arXiv:2409.10800. 63

    work page doi:10.1112/topo.70049 2025

  77. [77]

    2025), arXiv:2508.19624v1

    Pădurariu, T., and Toda, Y.,The Dolbeault geometric Langlands conjecture via limit categories, preprint v1 (27 Aug. 2025), arXiv:2508.19624v1

    work page arXiv 2025

  78. [78]

    Shifted Symplectic Structures

    Pantev, T., Toën, B., Vaquié, M., and Vezzosi, G.,Shifted symplectic structures, Publ. Math., Inst. Hautes Étud. Sci. 117 (2013), 271–328. doi:10.1007/s10240-013-0054-1, arXiv:1111.3209

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1007/s10240-013-0054-1 2013

  79. [79]

    Moduli of Bridgeland semistable objects on 3-folds and Donaldson-Thomas invariants

    Piyaratne, D., and Toda, Y.,Moduli of Bridgeland semistable objects on3-folds and Donaldson– Thomas invariants, J. Reine Angew. Math. 747 (2019), 175–219. doi:10.1515/crelle-2016-0006, arXiv:1504.01177

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1515/crelle-2016-0006 2019

  80. [80]

    Polishchuk, A., and Vaintrob, A.,Matrix factorizations and singularity categories for stacks, Ann. Inst. Fourier, 61.7 (2011), 2609–2642. doi:10.5802/aif.2788, arXiv:1011.4544

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.5802/aif.2788 2011

Showing first 80 references.