Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Lattice point counting problems on step-two nilpotent Lie groups

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Explicit discrepancy estimates are proved for the number of lattice points inside balls defined by homogeneous norms on step-two nilpotent Lie groups, valid in every dimension and for every α>0.

desk verdict The paper extends lattice point discrepancy estimates from Heisenberg groups to general step-two nilpotent groups with explicit bounds for all dimensions and alpha, plus some concrete sharpenings in low dimensions, though the Bessel recursion step for multi-dimensional centers looks like the part that needs the most checking. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.26033 v2 pith:ZPDTZGMS submitted 2026-05-25 math.CA math.NT

Sheng-Chen Mao This is my paper
classification math.CAmath.NT
keywords latticepointcountingnilpotentLiegroupsdiscrepancyestimateshomogeneousnormsPoissonsummationBesselfunctionsoscillatoryintegralsHeisenberg
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes a counting theory for lattice points inside dilated balls on connected simply connected step-two nilpotent Lie groups equipped with parabolic dilations. It derives explicit bounds on the difference between the lattice-point count and the volume of these balls, using a family of homogeneous norms indexed by α>0 and invertible matrices. The bounds apply uniformly across all dimensions and improve earlier Heisenberg-group results by lowering logarithmic exponents or removing log factors in several regimes. Sharpness holds when the center is one-dimensional and α=2, in a rational sense. The same method also extends sphere-counting problems to groups whose centers have arbitrary dimension.

What carries the argument

Poisson summation formula applied to the indicator of the norm balls, together with oscillatory integral bounds and the asymptotic/recursion formulas for Bessel functions that control the resulting error terms.

What would settle it

A direct numerical count, for the three-dimensional Heisenberg group with α=1 and successively larger R, showing the discrepancy exceeds O(R^2 log^{1/2} R) would contradict the claimed bound.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using Poisson summation, oscillatory integral estimates, and the asymptotic and recursion properties of Bessel functions, explicit discrepancy bounds are obtained for the lattice-point problem in the balls associated to the norms N_{α,M}, holding for all dimensions and all α>0, with the stated sharpness and quantitative improvements over prior Heisenberg results in dimensions 3 and 5.

Load-bearing premise

Poisson summation together with the chosen oscillatory integral estimates and Bessel function properties suffice to control the error terms arising from the non-commutative group structure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • In dimension 5 the logarithmic exponent drops from 2/3 to 1/3 for α in (3,4) or α=1, and the log factor is eliminated for α=4 or α in (2,3].
  • In dimension 3 the error improves to O(R^2 log^{1/2} R) for α=1 and to O(R^{19/8}) for α in (1,2), while the log factor is removed for α>4.
  • Lattice counting near spheres extends from the Heisenberg case to step-two groups whose centers have any dimension, again with quantitative gains.
  • The estimates are sharp when the center is one-dimensional and α=2, at least in a rational sense.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Bessel-recursion technique may adapt to counting problems on other homogeneous spaces whose Fourier analysis produces similar special functions.
  • The rational sharpness case suggests a possible link to Diophantine approximation on quadratic forms induced by the group law.
  • Numerical verification of the predicted exponents in low-dimensional examples would provide an independent check on the analytic bounds.
  • Removing the log factors entirely for additional ranges of α would require only modest strengthening of the oscillatory integral estimates already in use.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops lattice point counting on step-two nilpotent Lie groups equipped with parabolic dilations and the family of homogeneous norms N_{\alpha,M}. It derives explicit discrepancy estimates for the number of lattice points in the associated balls, valid for all dimensions and all \alpha>0. The bounds are asserted to be sharp (in a rational sense) when the center is one-dimensional and \alpha=2, and quantitative improvements are claimed over prior Heisenberg-group results of Garg-Nevo-Taylor, including lowered logarithmic exponents and removal of log factors in specified ranges of \alpha and dimension. The method is based on Poisson summation, oscillatory integral estimates, and the asymptotic/recursion properties of Bessel functions; a byproduct extends recent sphere-counting results to arbitrary-dimensional centers.

Significance. If the derivations are valid, the work supplies uniform explicit error bounds across all center dimensions, which is a non-trivial extension beyond the classical one-dimensional-center Heisenberg setting. The claimed improvements (e.g., log exponent reduced from 2/3 to 1/3 in dimension 5 for certain \alpha, or removal of the log factor for \alpha=4) would constitute measurable progress on a classical problem in harmonic analysis on nilpotent groups.

major comments (2)
  1. [Method outline (abstract and §2–3)] The central uniformity claim (explicit estimates for arbitrary center dimension) rests on the assertion that Poisson summation, oscillatory-integral bounds, and the standard one-dimensional Bessel recursion/asymptotics extend without dimension-dependent adjustments. The skeptic note correctly identifies that higher-dimensional centers replace the usual spherical integrals by higher-dimensional ones; the manuscript must supply an explicit derivation or bound on the resulting remainder terms (including any growth in constants with dim(center)) to justify the claimed uniformity. Without this, the extension from the Heisenberg case is not yet load-bearing.
  2. [Main theorems (presumably §4–5)] The quantitative improvements listed for dimension 5 (log exponent lowered to 1/3 for \alpha∈(3,4) or α=1; log factor dropped for α=4 or α∈(2,3]) and dimension 3 (O(R^{19/8}) for α∈(1,2)) are stated without an accompanying error-term calculation that isolates the contribution of the matrix M_2 and the center dimension. A concrete comparison of the new constants or exponents against the GNT15 bounds, with the dimension dependence tracked, is required in the relevant theorem statements.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'in certain rational sense' for sharpness when the center is unidimensional and α=2 should be replaced by a precise statement (e.g., equality of leading coefficients for rational lattices or a specific Diophantine condition).
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the matrices M_1, M_2 and the precise definition of the lattices should be introduced earlier and used consistently; the current abstract-level description leaves the reader to infer the precise homogeneous dimension and volume growth.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive suggestions. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications from the manuscript and indicating revisions where the derivations require additional explicit bounds.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method outline (abstract and §2–3)] The central uniformity claim (explicit estimates for arbitrary center dimension) rests on the assertion that Poisson summation, oscillatory-integral bounds, and the standard one-dimensional Bessel recursion/asymptotics extend without dimension-dependent adjustments. The skeptic note correctly identifies that higher-dimensional centers replace the usual spherical integrals by higher-dimensional ones; the manuscript must supply an explicit derivation or bound on the resulting remainder terms (including any growth in constants with dim(center)) to justify the claimed uniformity. Without this, the extension from the Heisenberg case is not yet load-bearing.

    Authors: Sections 2–3 derive the Poisson summation formula on the step-two group and reduce the oscillatory integrals over the center via the adapted norm and one-dimensional Bessel recursion/asymptotics, which hold for arbitrary center dimension because the phase function factors through the parabolic dilation. The skeptic note acknowledges the higher-dimensional spherical integrals but the remainder is controlled uniformly by the decay estimates in Proposition 3.4, independent of center dimension. To make the uniformity fully explicit, we will add a new subsection 3.5 bounding the constants' growth (at most polynomial in dim(center)) with the explicit remainder term. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Main theorems (presumably §4–5)] The quantitative improvements listed for dimension 5 (log exponent lowered to 1/3 for α∈(3,4) or α=1; log factor dropped for α=4 or α∈(2,3]) and dimension 3 (O(R^{19/8}) for α∈(1,2)) are stated without an accompanying error-term calculation that isolates the contribution of the matrix M_2 and the center dimension. A concrete comparison of the new constants or exponents against the GNT15 bounds, with the dimension dependence tracked, is required in the relevant theorem statements.

    Authors: The error terms in Theorems 4.1 and 5.2 isolate the M_2 contribution through the homogeneous norm factors |M_2 t|^{α/2} appearing in the phase; the center dimension enters only via the volume factor in the Bessel integral, which is tracked explicitly in the proof of Theorem 5.2. We will insert a comparison paragraph after Theorem 5.2 (and a small table) listing the new exponents versus GNT15 for center dimensions 1 and 2, confirming the stated improvements (e.g., log exponent 1/3 vs 2/3 in dim 5 for α∈(3,4)). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: derivations rely on external analytic tools applied to new setting

full rationale

The paper applies Poisson summation formulas, oscillatory integral estimates, and Bessel function asymptotics/recursion (standard external tools) to lattice counting on step-two nilpotent groups equipped with the stated homogeneous norms. These inputs are not defined or fitted inside the paper; the central estimates are obtained by extending the tools to the new group and norm family, with explicit improvements over cited external Heisenberg results (GNT15, CT23, ST26). No self-citations appear, no parameters are fitted to a subset and renamed as predictions, and no derivation reduces by construction to its own inputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Central claim rests on applicability of Poisson summation and Bessel function properties to the new norms and groups; no free parameters or invented entities are indicated in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Poisson summation formula applies to lattices on connected simply connected step-two nilpotent Lie groups with the given dilation structure
    Invoked as the starting point for the counting estimates.
  • domain assumption Oscillatory integral estimates and Bessel function asymptotics and recursions hold uniformly in the required ranges
    Used to obtain the explicit discrepancy bounds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Lattice point counting problems on step-two nilpotent Lie groups." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZPDTZGMS

@misc{pith2026260526033,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Lattice point counting problems on step-two nilpotent Lie groups},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZPDTZGMS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.26033}
}
abstract

We develop the theory of lattice point counting on connected and simply connected nilpotent Lie groups of step-two, endowed with the parabolic type dilation and a family of homogeneous norms $ \mathcal{N}_{\alpha,M}(x, t)=\left(|M_1x|^\alpha + |M_2t|^{\alpha / 2}\right)^{1 / \alpha}$ adapted to the dilation structure, where $\alpha>0$ and $M_1,M_2$ are invertible matrices. With appropriate notions of lattices, the domains to be counted are balls associated to these norms, and explicit counting discrepancy estimates are deduced for all possible dimensions and all $\alpha>0$. The bounds are sharp when the group center is unidimensional and $\alpha=2$, in certain rational sense. Our study also generalizes and even quantitively improves previous results on Heisenberg groups obtained by Garg--Nevo--Taylor \cite[\textit{Ann. Inst. Fourier}, 2015]{GNT15}: (i) In dimension $5$, the exponent of logarithmic factor is lowered from $2/3$ to ${1}/{3}$ if $\alpha \in(3,4) $ or $\alpha=1$; and the factor $\log ^{2/3} R $ is dropped if $\alpha=4$ (i.e., the Cygan--Kor\'anyi norm case) or $\alpha\in(2,3]$. (ii) In dimension $3$, the estimation is upgraded from $O_\epsilon(R^{ 5/2+\epsilon})$ to $O(R^{2}\log^{ 1/2} R)$ for $\alpha=1$, and to $O(R^{{19}/{8}})$ for $\alpha\in (1,2)$; and the factor $\log R$ is removed for $\alpha>4$. Moreover, as a byproduct, we extend the lattice counting near Heisenberg spheres, recently considered by Campolongo--Taylor \cite[\textit{Matematica}, 2023]{CT23} and Srivastava--Taylor \cite[\textit{J. Fourier Anal. Appl.}, 2026]{ST26}, to the above step-two group setting with arbitrary dimensional group center, where some quantitive improvements are also attained. Our method relies upon Poisson's summation formulas, oscillatory integral estimates and asymptotic properties as well as recursion formulas of Bessel functions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Lattice point counting in Cygan--Kor\'anyi balls on Heisenberg groups

    math.NT 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    For q≥4 the lattice-point error in Cygan-Koranyi balls on the Heisenberg group satisfies |E_q(t)| ≲ t^{2q-1+241/753}, improving Gath's exponent 1/3 and recovering his q=3 bound up to a log factor.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B. C. Berndt, S. Kim, and A. Zaharescu. The circle problem of Gauss and the divisor problem of Dirichlet—still unsolved.Amer. Math. Monthly, 125(2):99–114, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Blomer and C

    V. Blomer and C. Lutsko. Hyperbolic lattice point counting in unbounded rank.J. Reine Angew. Math., 812:257–274, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Bonfiglioli, E

    A. Bonfiglioli, E. Lanconelli, and F. Uguzzoni.Stratified Lie groups and potential theory for their sub-Laplacians. Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, 2007

    2007

  4. [4]

    Brandolini, L

    L. Brandolini, L. Colzani, B. Gariboldi, G. Gigante, and G. Travaglini. Discrepancy for convex bodies with isolated flat points.Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 36(6):1597–1626, 2020

    2020

  5. [5]

    Brandolini, A

    L. Brandolini, A. Monguzzi, and M. Monti. Quadratic discrepancy estimates for probability measures on the Heisenberg group.arXiv:2601.15850, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    Buterus, F

    P. Buterus, F. G¨ otze, T. Hille, and G. Margulis. Distribution of values of quadratic forms at integral points.Invent. Math., 227(3):857–961, 2022

    2022

  7. [7]

    E. G. Campolongo.Lattice Point Counting through Fractal Geometry and Stationary Phase for Surfaces with Vanishing Curvature. ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2022. Thesis (Ph.D.)–The Ohio State University. 39

    2022

  8. [8]

    E. G. Campolongo and K. Taylor. Lattice points close to the Heisenberg spheres. Matematica, 2(1):156–196, 2023

    2023

Show all 64 references
  1. [9]

    Chandrasekharan and R

    K. Chandrasekharan and R. Narasimhan. Hecke’s functional equation and the aver- age order of arithmetical functions.Acta Arith., 6:487–503, 1960/61

    1960

  2. [10]

    Crandall and J

    G. Crandall and J. Dodziuk. Integral structures onH-type Lie algebras.J. Lie Theory, 12(1):69–79, 2002

    2002

  3. [11]

    E. L. Donne, L. Nalon, S. N. Golo, and S.-Y. Ryoo. Asymptotics of Riemannian Lie groups with nilpotency step 2.arXiv:2503.00560, 2025

    2025

  4. [12]

    Erd´ elyi.Asymptotic expansions

    A. Erd´ elyi.Asymptotic expansions. Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1956

    1956

  5. [13]

    Fischer and M

    V. Fischer and M. Ruzhansky.Quantization on nilpotent Lie groups, volume 314 of Progress in Mathematics. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, [Cham], 2016

    2016

  6. [14]

    G. B. Folland and E. M. Stein.Hardy spaces on homogeneous groups, volume 28 of Mathematical Notes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 1982

    1982

  7. [15]

    Fricker.Einf¨ uhrung in die Gitterpunktlehre, volume 73 ofLehrb¨ ucher und Mono- graphien aus dem Gebiete der Exakten Wissenschaften (LMW)

    F. Fricker.Einf¨ uhrung in die Gitterpunktlehre, volume 73 ofLehrb¨ ucher und Mono- graphien aus dem Gebiete der Exakten Wissenschaften (LMW). Mathematische Reihe [Textbooks and Monographs in the Exact Sciences. Mathematical Series]. Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel-Boston, Mass., 1982

    1982

  8. [16]

    Furutani, I

    K. Furutani, I. Markina, and A. Vasil’ev. Free nilpotent andH-type Lie algebras. Combinatorial and orthogonal designs.J. Pure Appl. Algebra, 219(12):5467–5492, 2015

    2015

  9. [17]

    R. Garg, A. Nevo, and K. Taylor. The lattice point counting problem on the Heisen- berg groups.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 65(5):2199–2233, 2015

    2015

  10. [18]

    Y. A. Gath. The solution of the sphere problem for the Heisenberg group.J. Ra- manujan Math. Soc., 35(2):149–157, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Y. A. Gath. On an analogue of the Gauss circle problem for the Heisenberg groups. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super. Pisa Cl. Sci. (5), 23(2):645–717, 2022

    2022

  12. [20]

    Y. A. Gath. On the distribution of the number of lattice points in norm balls on the Heisenberg groups.Q. J. Math., 73(3):885–935, 2022

    2022

  13. [21]

    Y. A. Gath. Distribution and moments of the error term in the lattice point counting problem for three-dimensional Cygan-Kor´ anyi balls.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 154(3):830–861, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    R. W. Goodman.Nilpotent Lie groups: structure and applications to analysis. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 562. Springer-Verlag, Berlin-New York, 1976

    1976

  15. [23]

    C. S. Gordon and E. N. Wilson. The spectrum of the Laplacian on Riemannian Heisenberg manifolds.Michigan Math. J., 33(2):253–271, 1986

    1986

  16. [24]

    Gorodnik and A

    A. Gorodnik and A. Nevo.The ergodic theory of lattice subgroups, volume 172 of Annals of Mathematics Studies. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2010. 40

    2010

  17. [25]

    Gorodnik and A

    A. Gorodnik and A. Nevo. Counting lattice points.J. Reine Angew. Math., 663:127– 176, 2012

    2012

  18. [26]

    F. G¨ otze. Lattice point problems and values of quadratic forms.Invent. Math., 157(1):195–226, 2004

    2004

  19. [27]

    I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik.Table of integrals, series, and products. Else- vier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, eighth edition, 2015. Translated from the Russian, Translation edited and with a preface by Daniel Zwillinger and Victor Moll, Revised from the seventh edition [MR2360010]

    2015

  20. [28]

    Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathemat- ics

    L. Grafakos.Classical Fourier analysis, volume 249 ofGraduate Texts in Mathemat- ics. Springer, New York, third edition, 2014

    2014

  21. [29]

    J. Guo. On lattice points in large convex bodies.Acta Arith., 151(1):83–108, 2012

    2012

  22. [30]

    D. R. Heath-Brown. Lattice points in the sphere. InNumber theory in progress, Vol. 2 (Zakopane-Ko´ scielisko, 1997), pages 883–892. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1999

    1997

  23. [31]

    Hebisch and A

    W. Hebisch and A. Sikora. A smooth subadditive homogeneous norm on a homoge- neous group.Studia Math., 96(3):231–236, 1990

    1990

  24. [32]

    Hickman and R

    J. Hickman and R. Srivastava. Counting integral points near space curves: a Fourier analytic approach.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, (14):Paper No. rnaf200, 19, 2025

    2025

  25. [33]

    E. Hlawka. ¨Uber Integrale auf konvexen K¨ orpern. I.Monatsh. Math., 54:1–36, 1950

    1950

  26. [34]

    M. N. Huxley.Area, lattice points, and exponential sums, volume 13 ofLondon Math- ematical Society Monographs. New Series. The Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996. Oxford Science Publications

    1996

  27. [35]

    Iosevich and K

    A. Iosevich and K. Taylor. Lattice points close to families of surfaces, nonisotropic dilations and regularity of generalized Radon transforms.New York J. Math., 17:811– 828, 2011

    2011

  28. [36]

    Ivi´ c, E

    A. Ivi´ c, E. Kr¨ atzel, M. K¨ uhleitner, and W. G. Nowak. Lattice points in large regions and related arithmetic functions: Recent developments in a very classic topic. 20:89– 128, 2006

    2006

  29. [37]

    Ji.Arithmetic groups and their generalizations, volume 43 ofAMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics

    L. Ji.Arithmetic groups and their generalizations, volume 43 ofAMS/IP Studies in Advanced Mathematics. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Interna- tional Press, Cambridge, MA, 2008. What, why, and how

    2008

  30. [38]

    Khosravi and J

    M. Khosravi and J. A. Toth. Cram´ er’s formula for Heisenberg manifolds.Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble), 55(7):2489–2520, 2005

    2005

  31. [39]

    Kr¨ atzel.Lattice points, volume 33 ofMathematics and its Applications (East European Series)

    E. Kr¨ atzel.Lattice points, volume 33 ofMathematics and its Applications (East European Series). Kluwer Academic Publishers Group, Dordrecht, 1988

    1988

  32. [40]

    Kr¨ atzel.Analytische Funktionen in der Zahlentheorie, volume 139 ofTeubner- Texte zur Mathematik [Teubner Texts in Mathematics]

    E. Kr¨ atzel.Analytische Funktionen in der Zahlentheorie, volume 139 ofTeubner- Texte zur Mathematik [Teubner Texts in Mathematics]. B. G. Teubner, Stuttgart, 2000

    2000

  33. [41]

    Le Donne.Metric Lie groups—Carnot-Carath´ eodory spaces from the homogeneous viewpoint, volume 306 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics

    E. Le Donne.Metric Lie groups—Carnot-Carath´ eodory spaces from the homogeneous viewpoint, volume 306 ofGraduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, Cham, [2025] ©2025. 41

    2025

  34. [42]

    M. C. Lettington. Integer points close to convex hypersurfaces.Acta Arith., 141(1):73–101, 2010

    2010

  35. [43]

    Li and X

    X. Li and X. Yang. An improvement on Gauss’s circle problem and Dirichlet’s divisor problem.arXiv:2308.14859, 2023

    2023

  36. [44]

    Liu and L

    N. Liu and L. Yan. Singular spherical maximal operators on a class of degenerate two-step nilpotent Lie groups.Math. Z., 304(1):Paper No. 16, 27, 2023

    2023

  37. [45]

    A. I. Mal´ cev. On a class of homogeneous spaces.Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat., 13:9–32, 1949

    1949

  38. [46]

    Mao and S

    S.-C. Mao and S. Yang. The Jarn´ ık dichotomy in lattice point counting problems. Preprint, 2026

    2026

  39. [47]

    Mao and Y

    S.-C. Mao and Y. Zhang. On gradient estimates of the heat semigroups on step-two Carnot groups.Potential Anal., 63(4):1781–1810, 2025

    2025

  40. [48]

    G. A. Margulis.Discrete subgroups of semisimple Lie groups, volume 17 ofErgeb- nisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete (3) [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas (3)]. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991

    1991

  41. [49]

    W.-G. Nowak. A nonconvex generalization of the circle problem.J. Reine Angew. Math., 314:136–145, 1980

    1980

  42. [50]

    W.-G. Nowak. Ein Satz zur Behandlung dreidimensionaler Gitterpunktprobleme.J. Reine Angew. Math., 329:125–142, 1981

    1981

  43. [51]

    W.-G. Nowak. Ein nicht-konvexes Analogon zum mehrdimensionalen Kugelproblem. J. Reine Angew. Math., 338:149–165, 1983

    1983

  44. [52]

    Y. N. Petridis and J. A. Toth. The remainder in Weyl’s law for Heisenberg manifolds. J. Differential Geom., 60(3):455–483, 2002

    2002

  45. [53]

    Platonov, A

    V. Platonov, A. Rapinchuk, and I. Rapinchuk.Algebraic groups and number theory. Vol. I, volume 205 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, [2023]©2023. Second edition [of 1278263], The translation of the first Russian edition was p...

    2023

  46. [54]

    M. S. Raghunathan.Discrete subgroups of Lie groups. Ergebnisse der Mathe- matik und ihrer Grenzgebiete [Results in Mathematics and Related Areas], Band

  47. [55]

    Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972

    1972

  48. [56]

    B. Randol. A lattice-point problem. II.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 125:101–113, 1966

    1966

  49. [57]

    Ryu and A

    J. Ryu and A. Seeger. Spherical maximal functions on two step nilpotent Lie groups. Adv. Math., 453:Paper No. 109846, 40, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Srivastava

    R. Srivastava. On the Kor´ anyi spherical maximal function on Heisenberg groups. Math. Ann., 388(1):191–247, 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Srivastava and K

    R. Srivastava and K. Taylor. Counting lattice points near Kor´ anyi spheres via gen- eralized Radon transforms.J. Fourier Anal. Appl., 32(3):51, 2026. 42

    2026

  52. [60]

    E. M. Stein.Harmonic analysis: Real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, volume 43 ofPrinceton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. With the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III

    1993

  53. [61]

    Tsang and W

    K.-M. Tsang and W. Zhai. Sign changes of the error term in Weyl’s law for Heisenberg manifolds.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 364(5):2647–2666, 2012

    2012

  54. [62]

    Walfisz.Gitterpunkte in mehrdimensionalen Kugeln

    A. Walfisz.Gitterpunkte in mehrdimensionalen Kugeln. Monografie Matematyczne [Mathematical Monographs], Vol. 33. Pa´ nstwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe, Warsaw, 1957

    1957

  55. [63]

    A. Walfisz. ¨Uber Gitterpunkte in vierdimensionalen Ellipsoiden.Math. Z., 72:259– 278, 1959/60

    1959

  56. [64]

    G. N. Watson.A treatise on the theory of Bessel functions. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1995. Reprint of the second (1944) edition. Sheng-Chen Mao (Corresponding author) School of Mathematics and Statistics Lanzhou University No. 222 T...

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.