pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.26264 · v1 · pith:SP5GJXFSnew · submitted 2026-05-25 · 🧮 math.AP · math.CA· math.SP

Uncertainty Principles, Spectral Localization, and Singular Schr\"odinger Operators on Compact Manifolds

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 20:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP math.CAmath.SP
keywords uncertainty principlescompact manifoldsspectral localizationSchrödinger operatorsspectral projectionsKato classincomplete data recovery
0
0 comments X

The pith

Uncertainty principles on compact manifolds relate the support of spectrally localized functions to the size of their spectral clusters.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors establish uncertainty principles that connect the measure of the support of a function localized to a spectral cluster with the number of eigenvalues in that cluster and certain Fourier ratio quantities. This is achieved by merging restriction estimates for systems of orthonormal functions with bounds on spectral projections associated to the Laplace-Beltrami operator. Similar principles are derived for Schrödinger operators that include singular potentials from the Kato class or scaling-critical classes. The results also provide uniqueness theorems for reconstructing functions from partial spectral information on these manifolds. Under additional assumptions of nonpositive or negative sectional curvature, logarithmically improved bounds are obtained for shrinking spectral windows.

Core claim

The paper claims that by combining restriction estimates for orthonormal systems with spectral projection bounds, one obtains uncertainty principles on compact Riemannian manifolds without boundary. These principles bound the support size of spectrally localized functions in terms of the cardinality of the spectral cluster and Fourier-ratio type quantities. Analogues hold for Schrödinger operators with potentials in the Kato and scaling-critical classes, and the principles imply uniqueness for recovery from incomplete spectral data. Logarithmically improved versions follow under curvature assumptions such as nonpositive sectional curvature.

What carries the argument

Restriction estimates for orthonormal systems combined with spectral projection bounds for the Laplace-Beltrami and Schrödinger operators, which relate support size to spectral cluster cardinality.

If this is right

  • Analogues of the uncertainty principles hold for Schrödinger operators with singular potentials in Kato and scaling-critical classes.
  • Uniqueness results follow for recovery of functions from incomplete spectral data on compact manifolds.
  • Logarithmically improved uncertainty principles hold under assumptions of nonpositive or negative sectional curvature for shrinking spectral windows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These principles may extend to other types of operators on manifolds if similar projection bounds can be established.
  • Applications could include numerical recovery algorithms that exploit the uniqueness from partial data.
  • Testing on specific manifolds like the sphere or torus could verify the constants involved in the bounds.

Load-bearing premise

The results rely on the manifold being compact and without boundary, and on the potentials satisfying membership in the Kato or scaling-critical classes.

What would settle it

Finding a spectrally localized function on a compact manifold where the support size is larger than what the cluster cardinality and Fourier ratios would allow would disprove the uncertainty principle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26264 by Alex Iosevich, Chamsol Park.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Logarithmically shrinking spectral windows yield improved uncertainty princi￾ples on manifolds with nonpositive or negative sectional curvature. 4.2. V ∈ L n 2 (M) and n ≥ 3 for super-critical exponents. Let V ∈ L n 2 (M). The estimate (1.11) follows by combining the proof of (1.6) with the logarithmically improved spectral projection bounds ∥1[λ,λ+(log λ)−1]( p HV )f∥Lq(M) ≲ λ σ(q) (log(2 + λ))1/2 ∥f∥L2(M… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Recovery from incomplete spectral data. Agreement outside a missing spectral cluster forces the difference function to be spectrally localized. The uncertainty principle then prevents simultaneous spectral and spatial concentration. the spectral projection associated with an interval I ⊂ [0, ∞). If f = X j ⟨f, ej ⟩ej , we interpret the coefficients ⟨f, ej ⟩, λj ∈/ I, as the observed spectral data, while th… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We establish uncertainty principles on compact Riemannian manifolds without boundary by combining restriction estimates for orthonormal systems with spectral projection bounds for Laplace-Beltrami and Schr\"odinger operators. Our results relate the size of the support of spectrally localized functions to the cardinality of the underlying spectral cluster and to Fourier-ratio type quantities. We obtain analogues for Schr\"odinger operators with singular potentials belonging to Kato and scaling-critical classes. As an application, we prove uniqueness results for recovery from incomplete spectral data on compact manifolds. Under curvature assumptions, including nonpositive and negative sectional curvatures, we also prove logarithmically improved uncertainty principles associated with shrinking spectral windows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper establishes uncertainty principles on compact Riemannian manifolds without boundary by combining restriction estimates for orthonormal systems with spectral projection bounds for Laplace-Beltrami and Schrödinger operators. The results relate the size of the support of spectrally localized functions to the cardinality of the underlying spectral cluster and to Fourier-ratio type quantities. Analogues are obtained for Schrödinger operators with singular potentials in Kato and scaling-critical classes. Applications include uniqueness results for recovery from incomplete spectral data on compact manifolds. Logarithmically improved uncertainty principles are proved under curvature assumptions such as nonpositive and negative sectional curvatures.

Significance. If the results hold, they extend uncertainty principles and spectral localization results to compact manifolds with singular potentials in standard classes, with applications to inverse spectral problems. The approach of combining existing restriction estimates and spectral projection bounds is standard in the field, but the extensions to Kato-class and scaling-critical potentials, together with the curvature-dependent logarithmic improvements, add to the literature on spectral geometry and PDEs on manifolds.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is quite dense with technical terms (e.g., 'Fourier-ratio type quantities'); a brief parenthetical clarification or reference to the relevant section would improve readability for a broad audience.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the support size and spectral cluster cardinality should be introduced consistently in the introduction before being used in the statements of the main theorems.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No specific major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper explicitly frames its results as obtained by combining pre-existing restriction estimates for orthonormal systems with spectral projection bounds for the Laplace-Beltrami and Schrödinger operators. These inputs are treated as external and are invoked at the points where the modeling assumptions (compactness, Kato-class potentials, curvature conditions) enter. No derivation step reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, a self-defined quantity, or a load-bearing self-citation chain. The application to incomplete spectral data recovery follows directly from the combined estimates without internal redefinition. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular combination of known analytic tools.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on standard background results from spectral theory and harmonic analysis on manifolds. No free parameters or invented entities appear in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The Laplace-Beltrami operator on a compact Riemannian manifold without boundary admits well-defined spectral projections and eigenvalue clusters.
    Invoked when spectral projection bounds are combined with restriction estimates.
  • domain assumption Restriction estimates for orthonormal systems hold on the given manifold.
    Used as one of the two main ingredients to derive the uncertainty principles.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5636 in / 1430 out tokens · 44881 ms · 2026-06-29T20:17:53.054992+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Blair, Xiaoqi Huang, Yannick Sire, and Christopher D

    Matthew D. Blair, Xiaoqi Huang, Yannick Sire, and Christopher D. Sogge,Uniform Sobolev estimates on compact manifolds involving singular potentials, Rev. Mat. Iberoam.38(2022), no. 4, 1239–1286. MR 4445914 2, 3, 4, 7, 9, 13, 14, 15, 21, 23, 24, 25

  2. [2]

    Blair, Xiaoqi Huang, and Christopher D

    Matthew D. Blair, Xiaoqi Huang, and Christopher D. Sogge,Improved spectral projection estimates,https://ems. press/journals/jems/articles/14298419, 2022, to appear J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS), published online first, DOI 10.4171/JEMS/1571. 8, 14, 23 UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLES 31

  3. [3]

    Blair and Chamsol Park,L q estimates on the restriction of Schr¨ odinger eigenfunctions with singular potentials, Comm

    Matthew D. Blair and Chamsol Park,L q estimates on the restriction of Schr¨ odinger eigenfunctions with singular potentials, Comm. Partial Differential Equations50(2025), no. 10-12, 1234–1290. MR 5000983 4, 15

  4. [4]

    ,L p −L q resolvent restriction estimates for submanifolds, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.154(2026), no. 6, 2563–2576. MR 5065058 4, 15

  5. [5]

    Blair, Yannick Sire, and Christopher D

    Matthew D. Blair, Yannick Sire, and Christopher D. Sogge,Quasimode, eigenfunction and spectral projection bounds for Schr¨ odinger operators on manifolds with critically singular potentials, J. Geom. Anal.31(2021), no. 7, 6624–6661. MR 4289239 2, 3, 4, 6, 13, 14, 15

  6. [6]

    Blair and Christopher D

    Matthew D. Blair and Christopher D. Sogge,Logarithmic improvements inL p bounds for eigenfunctions at the critical exponent in the presence of nonpositive curvature, Invent. Math.217(2019), no. 2, 703–748. MR 3987179 8, 14, 23

  7. [7]

    Sogge, and Xiaohua Yao,OnL p-resolvent estimates and the density of eigen- values for compact Riemannian manifolds, Comm

    Jean Bourgain, Peng Shao, Christopher D. Sogge, and Xiaohua Yao,OnL p-resolvent estimates and the density of eigen- values for compact Riemannian manifolds, Comm. Math. Phys.333(2015), no. 3, 1483–1527. MR 3302640 15, 24

  8. [8]

    PDE16(2023), no

    Yaiza Canzani and Jeffrey Galkowski,Growth of highL p norms for eigenfunctions: an application of geodesic beams, Anal. PDE16(2023), no. 10, 2267–2325. MR 4678142 8

  9. [9]

    Donoho and Philip B

    David L. Donoho and Philip B. Stark,Uncertainty principles and signal recovery, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 49(1989), no. 3, 906–931. 5, 9, 12

  10. [10]

    Kenig, and Mikko Salo,OnL p resolvent estimates for Laplace-Beltrami operators on compact manifolds, Forum Math.26(2014), no

    David Dos Santos Ferreira, Carlos E. Kenig, and Mikko Salo,OnL p resolvent estimates for Laplace-Beltrami operators on compact manifolds, Forum Math.26(2014), no. 3, 815–849. MR 3200351 15

  11. [11]

    Semyon Dyatlov, Long Jin, and St´ ephane Nonnenmacher,Control of eigenfunctions on surfaces of variable curvature, J. Amer. Math. Soc.35(2022), no. 2, 361–465. MR 4374954 30

  12. [12]

    Frank and Julien Sabin,Restriction theorems for orthonormal functions, Strichartz inequalities, and uniform Sobolev estimates, Amer

    Rupert L. Frank and Julien Sabin,Restriction theorems for orthonormal functions, Strichartz inequalities, and uniform Sobolev estimates, Amer. J. Math.139(2017), no. 6, 1649–1691. MR 3730931 2

  13. [13]

    ,Spectral cluster bounds for orthonormal systems and oscillatory integral operators in Schatten spaces, Adv. Math. 317(2017), 157–192. MR 3682666 2, 5

  14. [14]

    MR 2688254 29

    Daniel Grieser,L p bounds for eigenfunctions and spectral projections of the Laplacian near concave boundaries, ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 1992, Thesis (Ph.D.)–University of California, Los Angeles. MR 2688254 29

  15. [15]

    Batu G¨ uneysu,On generalized Schr¨ odinger semigroups, J. Funct. Anal.262(2012), no. 11, 4639–4674. MR 2913682 2

  16. [16]

    3, 1435–1451

    Andrew Hassell and Melissa Tacy,Improvement of eigenfunction estimates on manifolds of nonpositive curvature, Forum Math.27(2015), no. 3, 1435–1451. MR 3341481 4, 5, 8, 13, 14

  17. [17]

    Jonathan Hickman,UniformL p resolvent estimates on the torus, Math. Res. Rep.1(2020), 31–45. MR 4387449 15

  18. [18]

    Sogge,ConcerningL p resolvent estimates for simply connected manifolds of constant curvature, J

    Shanlin Huang and Christopher D. Sogge,ConcerningL p resolvent estimates for simply connected manifolds of constant curvature, J. Funct. Anal.267(2014), no. 12, 4635–4666. MR 3275105 15

  19. [19]

    Sogge,Weyl formulae for Schr¨ odinger operators with critically singular potentials, Comm

    Xiaoqi Huang and Christopher D. Sogge,Weyl formulae for Schr¨ odinger operators with critically singular potentials, Comm. Partial Differential Equations46(2021), no. 11, 2088–2133. MR 4313448 14

  20. [20]

    Math.239(2025), no

    ,Curvature and sharp growth rates of log-quasimodes on compact manifolds, Invent. Math.239(2025), no. 3, 947–1008. MR 4861130 4, 5, 8, 13, 14, 23

  21. [21]

    Xiaoqi Huang, Xing Wang, and Cheng Zhang,Restriction of Schr¨ odinger Eigenfunctions to Submanifolds, Comm. Math. Phys.407(2026), no. 4, Paper No. 67. MR 5041854 4, 5, 14, 15, 18, 20, 22, 25

  22. [22]

    Math.410 (2022), Paper No

    Xiaoqi Huang and Cheng Zhang,Pointwise Weyl laws for Schr¨ odinger operators with singular potentials, Adv. Math.410 (2022), Paper No. 108688, 34. MR 4491246 14

  23. [23]

    ,Sharp pointwise Weyl laws for Schr¨ odinger operators with singular potentials on flat tori, Comm. Math. Phys. 401(2023), no. 2, 1063–1125. MR 4610271 14

  24. [24]

    1, 5, 7, 9, 13

    Alex Iosevich and Azita Mayeli,Uncertainty principles, restriction, Bourgain’sΛ q theorem, and signal recovery, Applied and Computational Harmonic Analysis76(2025), 101734. 1, 5, 7, 9, 13

  25. [25]

    Alex Iosevich, Azita Mayeli, and Emmett Wyman,Fourier uncertainty principles on Riemannian manifolds,https:// arxiv.org/abs/2411.09057, 2024. 4

  26. [26]

    ,Spectral synthesis on Riemannian manifolds,https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.21451, 2026, Preprint. 4

  27. [27]

    Alex Iosevich and Chamsol Park,Uncertainty principles and singular potentials,https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.15442,

  28. [28]

    C. E. Kenig, A. Ruiz, and C. D. Sogge,Uniform Sobolev inequalities and unique continuation for second order constant coefficient differential operators, Duke Math. J.55(1987), no. 2, 329–347. MR 894584 15

  29. [29]

    3-4, 153–201

    Peter Li and Shing-Tung Yau,On the parabolic kernel of the Schr¨ odinger operator, Acta Math.156(1986), no. 3-4, 153–201. MR 834612 2

  30. [30]

    Elon Lindenstrauss,Invariant measures and arithmetic quantum unique ergodicity, Ann. of Math. (2)163(2006), no. 1, 165–219. MR 2195133 30

  31. [31]

    5, 1383–1392

    Tianyi Ren and An Zhang,Improved spectral cluster bounds for orthonormal systems, Forum Math.36(2024), no. 5, 1383–1392. MR 4790804 2

  32. [32]

    Peng Shao and Xiaohua Yao,Uniform Sobolev resolvent estimates for the Laplace-Beltrami operator on compact manifolds, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2014), no. 12, 3439–3463. MR 3217667 25

  33. [33]

    Barry Simon,Schr¨ odinger semigroups, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.)7(1982), no. 3, 447–526. MR 670130 2

  34. [34]

    Smith and Christopher D

    Hart F. Smith and Christopher D. Sogge,On theL p norm of spectral clusters for compact manifolds with boundary, Acta Math.198(2007), no. 1, 107–153. MR 2316270 29

  35. [35]

    Sogge,Concerning theL p norm of spectral clusters for second-order elliptic operators on compact manifolds, J

    Christopher D. Sogge,Concerning theL p norm of spectral clusters for second-order elliptic operators on compact manifolds, J. Funct. Anal.77(1988), no. 1, 123–138. 26

  36. [36]

    210, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017

    ,Fourier integrals in classical analysis, second ed., Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 210, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017. MR 3645429 24, 26, 27 32 A. IOSEVICH AND C. PARK

  37. [37]

    Kannan Soundararajan,Quantum unique ergodicity forSL 2(Z)\H, Ann. of Math. (2)172(2010), no. 2, 1529–1538. MR 2680500 30

  38. [38]

    Karl-Theodor Sturm,Schr¨ odinger semigroups on manifolds, J. Funct. Anal.118(1993), no. 2, 309–350. MR 1250266 2 Department of Mathematics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA Email address:alex.iosevich@rochester.edu Department of Mathematics, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627, USA Email address:cpark63@ur.rochester.edu