REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 19 references
Motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells and the connective formal group law
T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3
Pith's one-line read The connective formal group law yields a β-deformation of motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells that specializes to known classes and admits explicit combinatorial descriptions for d=1.
desk verdict The paper defines a beta-deformation of motivic Segre classes via the connective formal group law, supplies d=1 lattice-model representatives and a puzzle formula proved with quantum-group intertwiners, and realizes them in a cobordism ring quotient after a GKM check. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The β-deformation of motivic Segre classes defined via the connective formal group law, with rational representatives from the solvable lattice model and structure constants from Knutson-Tao puzzles in the d=1 case.
What would settle it
A direct check for small d=1 cases in which the rational function representatives from the lattice model fail to match the expected specialization at β=1 would falsify the deformation construction.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
We use the connective formal group law to define a one-parameter (β-)deformation of the motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells in the d-step flag variety. This β-deformation specializes to the motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells when β=1 and to the Segre-Schwartz-MacPherson classes of Schubert cells when β=0. We define rational function representatives for the β-deformed classes in the d=1 case in terms of a solvable lattice model, and we prove a combinatorial formula for the structure constants in the β-deformed basis in the d=1 case using Knutson-Tao puzzles. The proof of the puzzle formula involves intertwiners for representations of the multi-parameter quantum group of type â2. We s
Load-bearing premise
The connective formal group law supplies a deformation of the motivic Segre classes that preserves the geometric and algebraic properties needed for the specializations at β=0 and β=1 to hold and for the GKM condition to be satisfiable in the cobordism ring.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- The β-deformed classes specialize to the motivic Segre classes when β=1.
- The β-deformed classes specialize to the Segre-Schwartz-MacPherson classes when β=0.
- The β-deformed classes in the d=1 case have rational function representatives from the solvable lattice model.
- The structure constants of the β-deformed basis are given by the combinatorial puzzle formula.
- The β-deformations correspond to quotients of canonical elements in the equivariant algebraic cobordism ring that satisfy a GKM condition.
Reading between the lines
- The lattice model solvability could be checked in higher d to test whether explicit representatives extend beyond the one-step case.
- The quantum group intertwiners used for the puzzle proof may connect the construction to other representation-theoretic approaches in Schubert calculus.
- The GKM verification step offers a method that might apply to deformations of similar classes on other homogeneous spaces.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The manuscript defines a one-parameter β-deformation of the motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells in the d-step flag variety via the connective formal group law. This deformation is asserted to specialize to the motivic Segre classes at β=1 and to the Segre-Schwartz-MacPherson classes at β=0. For the d=1 case, rational-function representatives are constructed via a solvable lattice model, and a combinatorial formula for the structure constants in the deformed basis is proved using Knutson-Tao puzzles together with intertwiners for the multi-parameter quantum group of type â2. The deformed classes are realized as quotients of canonical elements in a quotient of the equivariant algebraic cobordism ring of the cotangent bundle of the flag variety, after verifying a GKM-type condition on those elements.
Significance. If the compatibility of the deformation with the required geometric and algebraic properties holds, the work supplies an explicit bridge between motivic and classical Segre classes together with combinatorial tools (lattice models, puzzle formulas) and a cobordism-ring interpretation. The explicit use of solvable lattice models and the proof of the puzzle formula via quantum-group intertwiners constitute concrete, verifiable contributions for the d=1 case.
major comments (1)
- [construction of the β-deformed classes and the GKM verification paragraph] The central construction (abstract and opening sections) defines the β-deformed classes directly from the connective formal group law and asserts that the resulting objects specialize correctly at β=0,1 while satisfying the GKM condition needed for the cobordism interpretation. Because this compatibility is invoked both for the specializations and for the final realization as quotients of canonical elements, an explicit verification that the lattice-model representatives and the GKM condition remain valid for generic β (rather than only at the endpoints) is required; without it, the combinatorial formula and the cobordism claim lose their claimed geometric meaning.
minor comments (1)
- [d=1 combinatorial section] Notation for the multi-parameter quantum group of type â2 and the precise definition of the lattice model should be introduced with a short self-contained paragraph or diagram to aid readers unfamiliar with the â2 intertwiners.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and the detailed comment on the central construction. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate an explicit verification as requested.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: The central construction (abstract and opening sections) defines the β-deformed classes directly from the connective formal group law and asserts that the resulting objects specialize correctly at β=0,1 while satisfying the GKM condition needed for the cobordism interpretation. Because this compatibility is invoked both for the specializations and for the final realization as quotients of canonical elements, an explicit verification that the lattice-model representatives and the GKM condition remain valid for generic β (rather than only at the endpoints) is required; without it, the combinatorial formula and the cobordism claim lose their claimed geometric meaning.
Authors: We agree that an explicit verification for generic β is necessary to fully support the geometric claims. The β-deformed classes are constructed algebraically via the connective formal group law over the ring ℤ[β], and the lattice-model representatives for d=1 are defined with weights that are polynomials in β. The GKM-type condition on the canonical elements in the quotient of the equivariant algebraic cobordism ring can therefore be verified by direct (albeit tedious) computation that holds identically as an identity in β, after which the specializations at β=0 and β=1 are obtained by substitution. The quantum-group intertwiners used for the puzzle formula are likewise defined over the multi-parameter ring that includes β. To make this verification fully explicit rather than implicit in the algebraic setup, we will add a dedicated subsection (new Section 4.3 or equivalent) that carries out the GKM check for a generic β and records the resulting identities. This revision will be included in the next version of the manuscript. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No circularity: deformation defined from standard object with independent combinatorial and geometric proofs
full rationale
The paper defines the β-deformation of motivic Segre classes directly from the connective formal group law (a pre-existing standard construction) and then derives rational representatives via a lattice model, proves structure constants via Knutson-Tao puzzles and quantum-group intertwiners, and realizes the classes in the cobordism ring after an explicit GKM verification. These steps are presented as independent derivations rather than reductions to fitted inputs or self-citations. No equation or claim reduces a result to its own definition by construction.
Assumptions & free parameters
free parameters (1)
- β
assumptions (2)
- domain assumption The connective formal group law can be used to deform motivic Segre classes while preserving the required specialization properties at β=0 and β=1.
- domain assumption Canonical elements exist in the quotient of the equivariant algebraic cobordism ring and satisfy a GKM-type condition.
invented entities (1)
-
β-deformed motivic Segre classes
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells and the connective formal group law." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZTWQZDOS
@misc{pith2026260526556,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells and the connective formal group law},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZTWQZDOS}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.26556}
}
abstract
We use the connective formal group law to define a one-parameter ($\beta$-)deformation of the motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells in the $d$-step flag variety. This $\beta$-deformation specializes to the motivic Segre classes of Schubert cells when $\beta=1$ and to the Segre-Schwartz-MacPherson classes of Schubert cells when $\beta=0$. We define rational function representatives for the $\beta$-deformed classes in the $d=1$ case in terms of a solvable lattice model, and we prove a combinatorial formula for the structure constants in the $\beta$-deformed basis in the $d=1$ case using Knutson-Tao puzzles. The proof of the puzzle formula involves intertwiners for representations of the multi-parameter quantum group of type $\widehat{a}_2$. We show that our $\beta$-deformations can be viewed as quotients of canonical elements in a quotient of the equivariant algebraic cobordism ring of the cotangent bundle of the flag variety by proving that the canonical elements satisfy a GKM type condition.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
[AM16] Paolo Aluffi and Leonardo C. Mihalcea. Chern-Schwartz-MacPherson classes for Schubert cells in flag manifolds.Compos. Math., 152(12):2603–2625, 2016.doi:10.1112/S0010437X16007685. [AMSS23] Paolo Aluffi, Leonardo C. Mihalcea, J ¨org Sch ¨urmann, and Changjian Su. Shadows of characteristic cycles, Verma mod- ules, and positivity of Chern-Schwartz-Mac...
-
[2]
[AST91] Michael Artin, William Schelter, and John Tate
doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0101. [AST91] Michael Artin, William Schelter, and John Tate. Quantum deformations ofGL n.Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 44(8-9):879–895, 1991.doi:10.1002/cpa.3160440804. [BB73] A. Białynicki-Birula. Some theorems on actions of algebraic groups.Ann. of Math. (2), 98:480–497, 1973.doi:10.2307/ 1970915. [BE90] Paul Bressler and Sam Evens....
-
[3]
doi:10.2307/2154142. [Bri97] M. Brion. Equivariant Chow groups for torus actions.Transform. Groups, 2(3):225–267, 1997.doi:10.1007/BF01234659. [BSY10] Jean-Paul Brasselet, J ¨org Sch¨urmann, and Shoji Yokura. Hirzebruch classes and motivic Chern classes for singular spaces. J. Topol. Anal., 2(1):1–55, 2010.doi:10.1142/S1793525310000239. [Cai08] Shuang Cai...
-
[4]
https://arxiv.org/abs/0905.1341.doi:10.24033/asens
-
[5]
https://arxiv.org/abs/1312.0019.doi:10.1007/s00229-018-1058-4. [Dem73] Michel Demazure. Invariants sym ´etriques entiers des groupes de Weyl et torsion.Invent. Math., 21:287–301, 1973.doi: 10.1007/BF01418790. [Dem74] Michel Demazure. Une nouvelle formule des caract `eres.Bull. Sci. Math. (2), 98(3):163–172,
work page Pith review arXiv doi:10.1007/s00229-018-1058-4 1973
-
[6]
Algebraic Cobordism of Classifying Spaces
[Des] Dinesh Deshpande. Algebraic cobordism of classifying spaces. https://arxiv.org/abs/0907.4437v1. [DL14] Shouxin Dai and Marc Levine. Connective algebraicK-theory.J. K-Theory, 13(1):9–56, 2014.doi:10.1017/ is013012007jkt249. 52Raj Gandhi [EG98] Dan Edidin and William Graham. Equivariant intersection theory.Invent. Math., 131(3):595–634, 1998.doi:10.10...
work page Pith review arXiv 2014
-
[7]
With a view toward algebraic geometry.doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5350-1. [FKsd] Sergey Fomin and Anatol N. Kirillov. Grothendieck polynomials and the Yang-Baxter equation. InFormal power series and algebraic combinatorics/S´ eries formelles et combinatoire alg´ ebrique, pages 183–189. DIMACS, Piscataway, NJ, sd. [Fr¨o68] A. Fr ¨ohlich.Formal groups. Lecture N...
-
[8]
Feh ´er, Rich ´ard Rim ´anyi, and Andrzej Weber
[FRW21] L ´aszl´o M. Feh ´er, Rich ´ard Rim ´anyi, and Andrzej Weber. Motivic Chern classes and K-theoretic stable envelopes.Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3), 122(1):153–189, 2021.doi:10.1112/plms.12374. [Gan] Raj Gandhi. Sagemath scripts. https://github.com/RajGandhi97/Motivic-Segre-classes-of-Schubert-cells-and-the- connective-formal-group-law. Accessed 13 Ja...
Show all 19 references
-
[9]
[HP12] Naihong Hu and Yufeng Pei
https://arxiv.org/abs/1208.4114.doi:10.1007/ s00029-013-0132-8. [HP12] Naihong Hu and Yufeng Pei. Notes on two-parameter quantum groups, (II).Comm. Algebra, 40(9):3202–3220, 2012.doi: 10.1080/00927872.2011.562581. [HPR10] Naihong Hu, Yufeng Pei, and Marc Rosso. Multi-parameter...
-
[10]
[Knu23] Allen Knutson
doi:10.1090/jag/773. [Knu23] Allen Knutson. Schubert calculus and quiver varieties. InICM—International Congress of Mathematicians. Vol
-
[11]
[Kri12a] Amalendu Krishna
©2023. [Kri12a] Amalendu Krishna. Equivariant cobordism for torus actions.Adv. Math., 231(5):2858–2891, 2012.doi:10.1016/j.aim. 2012.07.025. [Kri12b] Amalendu Krishna. Equivariant cobordism of schemes.Doc. Math., 17:95–134,
2023 doi
-
[12]
Elliptic classes of Schubert varieties.Math
[KRW20] Shrawan Kumar, Rich ´ard Rim´anyi, and Andrzej Weber. Elliptic classes of Schubert varieties.Math. Ann., 378(1-2):703–728, 2020.doi:10.1007/s00208-020-02043-z. [KT03] Allen Knutson and Terence Tao. Puzzles and (equivariant) cohomology of Grassmannians.Duke Math. J., 11...
2020 doi
-
[13]
Algebraic cobordism revisited.Invent
[LP09] Marc Levine and Rahul Pandharipande. Algebraic cobordism revisited.Invent. Math., 176(1):63–130, 2009.doi:10.1007/ s00222-008-0160-8. [LXZ] Cristian Lenart, Rui Xiong, and Changlong Zhong. Combinatorial aspects of elliptic schubert calculus. https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.0...
2009
-
[14]
Quiver varieties and finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras.J
[Nak01] Hiraku Nakajima. Quiver varieties and finite-dimensional representations of quantum affine algebras.J. Amer. Math. Soc., 14(1):145–238, 2001.doi:10.1090/S0894-0347-00-00353-2. [Ohm06] Toru Ohmoto. Equivariant Chern classes of singular algebraic varieties with group act...
-
[15]
[RV18] Rich ´ard Rim ´anyi and Alexander Varchenko
With an appendix by Allen Knutson and Rosu.doi:10.1007/s00209-002-0447-1. [RV18] Rich ´ard Rim ´anyi and Alexander Varchenko. Equivariant Chern-Schwartz-MacPherson classes in partial flag varieties: interpolation and formulae. InSchubert varieties, equivariant cohomology and c...
-
[16]
Elliptic classes of Schubert varieties via Bott-Samelson resolution.J
[RW20] Rich ´ard Rim ´anyi and Andrzej Weber. Elliptic classes of Schubert varieties via Bott-Samelson resolution.J. Topol., 13(3):1139–1182, 2020.doi:10.1112/topo.12152. [Sul71] D. Sullivan. Combinatorial invariants of analytic spaces. InProceedings of Liverpool Singularities...
2020 doi
-
[17]
On the K-theory stable bases of the Springer resolution.Ann
[SZZ20] Changjian Su, Gufang Zhao, and Changlong Zhong. On the K-theory stable bases of the Springer resolution.Ann. Sci. ´Ec. Norm. Sup´ er. (4), 53(3):663–711, 2020.doi:10.24033/asens.2431. [Tot97] Burt Totaro. Torsion algebraic cycles and complex cobordism.J. Amer. Math. So...
2020 doi
-
[18]
Knutson.doi:10.4007/annals.2006.164.371
Appendix A written with A. Knutson.doi:10.4007/annals.2006.164.371. [WZJ19] Michael Wheeler and Paul Zinn-Justin. Littlewood-Richardson coefficients for Grothendieck polynomials from integra- bility.J. Reine Angew. Math., 757:159–195, 2019.doi:10.1515/crelle-2017-0033. [ZJ09] ...
- [19]
Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.