pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.27987 · v1 · pith:P67OXIKKnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · 🧮 math.DS

Perturbed Families of Symmetric Interval Exchange Maps

Idan Pazi , Vered Rom-Kedar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 10:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.DS
keywords interval exchange mapstime-reversal symmetryperiodic orbitsarea-preserving mapsperturbationsbifurcationsstandard map
0
0 comments X

The pith

For small perturbations, symmetric periodic orbits persist in families of interval exchange maps and can be located by one-dimensional searches along symmetry lines.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines families of interval exchange maps extended to two-dimensional area-preserving systems with an action variable, where each map inherits time-reversal symmetry. In the unperturbed case, a dense set of action values supports periodic intervals whose midpoints correspond to symmetric periodic orbits. Small perturbations break these intervals into isolated elliptic or hyperbolic orbits, yet the symmetric ones persist and reduce to a one-dimensional search along symmetry lines. Bifurcations that produce both symmetric and asymmetric orbits are analyzed and connected to those appearing in the standard map, treated as a perturbed family of two-interval exchanges. A reader would care because the setup models return maps from perturbed Hamiltonian impact systems and supplies a concrete method for tracking periodic structures under symmetry.

Core claim

Perturbed families of symmetric interval exchange maps inherit a time-reversal symmetry that remains intact under perturbation. This symmetry lets symmetric periodic orbits be located by a one-dimensional search along symmetry lines after the action variable ceases to be conserved. For sufficiently small perturbations the orbits persist while periodic intervals break into isolated elliptic or hyperbolic periodic orbits. The associated bifurcations that generate symmetric and asymmetric periodic orbits are described and shown to match those of the standard map when the latter is viewed as a perturbed family of two-interval exchange maps.

What carries the argument

Time-reversal symmetry preserved under perturbation, which characterizes periodic intervals in the unperturbed case and reduces the search for symmetric periodic orbits to symmetry lines.

If this is right

  • Symmetric periodic orbits persist for sufficiently small perturbations.
  • These orbits can be located by a one-dimensional search along symmetry lines.
  • Periodic intervals break into isolated elliptic or hyperbolic periodic orbits.
  • Bifurcations occur that generate both symmetric and asymmetric periodic orbits.
  • The bifurcations match those of the standard map when viewed as a perturbed two-interval exchange family.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The symmetry reduction may allow efficient numerical location of periodic orbits in related iso-energy return maps from impact systems.
  • The explicit link to the standard map opens the possibility of transferring twist-map techniques to interval-exchange families.
  • The one-dimensional search method could be tested directly on concrete perturbed examples to confirm persistence thresholds.

Load-bearing premise

The perturbation preserves the time-reversal symmetry of the maps.

What would settle it

Numerical computation on an explicit small perturbation that shows no symmetric periodic orbits remain along the symmetry lines, or that such orbits cannot be recovered by the one-dimensional search, would falsify the persistence statement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.27987 by Idan Pazi, Vered Rom-Kedar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: 4–IEM 𝐹 with alphabet A = {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶, 𝐷} and combinatorial data 𝜋 = 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 𝐶 𝐵 𝐷 𝐴  , the top row is the initial ordering, bottom row is its image, the final ordering. The combinatorial data 𝜋 is somewhat redundant, as we can assume without loss of gener￾ality that the initial ordering 𝜋0 is trivial. In this case, the essential information is encoded entirely by the final ordering 𝜋1. Henceforth, we will c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: 3–CEM 𝐹 with alphabet A = {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶}, combinatorial data 𝜋 = 𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐶 𝐵 𝐴  , initial and final rotation 𝜃0, 𝜃1. The symmetry of this map about the gray dashed diameter passing through 𝜃0 +𝜃1 2 will be discussed in Section 3. REMARK 2.2. Any 𝑑–CEM is a (𝑑 +2)–IEM when the circle is viewed as an interval starting at some arbitrary point (if the interval is starting at one of the discontinuity points, the map … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Symmetric 4–IEM, 𝜆 = (0.14, 0.4, 0.1, 0.36) with the orbit of periodic intervals 𝐽, 𝐹 (𝐽 ) , 𝐹2 (𝐽 ) , 𝐹3 (𝐽 ) = 𝐽. The interval is bounded between the left saddle connection (𝐵, 𝐵, 3) and the right saddle connection (𝐵, 𝐵, 3) (dashed lines). An IEM with no saddle connections is said to satisfy the infinite distinct orbit condition. Keane showed in [24] that such IEMs are minimal, meaning they have no inva… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The domain (left) and image (right) of a linear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The standard map for different perturbation values. The symmetry lines [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Symmetric 4–IEM, 𝜋 =  𝐴 𝐵 𝐶 𝐷 𝐷 𝐶 𝐵 𝐴 of the circle, but now there is a freedom in the choice of the reflection center. We show here that the natural choice for symmetric CEM is the reflection of the circle about the 𝜃0+𝜃1 2 angle, which we also denote by 𝑅, namely 𝑅 (𝑥) = −𝑥 +𝜃0 +𝜃1 mod 1. Throughout this section, when we apply 𝑅 to a subinterval, we will use equality of subin￾tervals; such equality is … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Hypothetical pair of non-symmetric 3-periodic intervals (𝐴𝑖 and 𝐵𝑖+1 are actually part of the same periodic interval). Note that 𝐵1 = 𝑅 (𝐴2 ) = 𝐿 (𝐴1 ) and 𝐵2 = 𝑅 (𝐴1 ) = 𝐿 (𝐴0 ). The orbits are actually contained in the periodic orbit 𝐾, 𝐹 (𝐾) , 𝐹2 (𝐾) , 𝐹3 (𝐾) = 𝐾. The map 𝐿 enforces each elemental subinterval to contain an even number of periodic intervals. Let 𝐶0,𝐶1, . . . ,𝐶2𝑞−1 denote the periodic in… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Non-symmetric pair of 2-periodic intervals of reversible IEM 𝐺 = 𝐹 ◦ 𝑆, where 𝐹 is symmetric and 𝑆 is the swap map from Theorem 3.4. Summarizing, we established that the time reversal symmetry of the IEM and the CEM implies that all their periodic intervals must be either symmetric or come in symmetric pairs, and that only the center of the symmetric intervals corresponds to symmetric periodic orbits. Impo… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The perturbed linear FIEM with 𝜆0 = (0.07, 0.06, 0.13, 0.29) , 𝜆1 = (0.12, 0.23, 0.29, 0.45). The symmetry lines Γ−7, . . . , Γ7 are shown in black and trajectories are plotted in different colors. The shaded background colors indicate the elemental subregions of the unperturbed FIEM. 0.4775 0.4780 0.4785 0.4790 0.4795 0.4800 x 0.282 0.283 0.284 0.285 0.286 0.287 0.288 y 2¼" = 0:110 0.4775 0.4780 0.4785 0.… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Bifurcation of periodic point by new intersection points of symmetry lines. The same perturbed linear FIEM [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The pitchfork bifurcation of the symmetric [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Series of close-ups (indicated by rectangles) of allegedly rotational invariant curves of the linear FIEM from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p037_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The FCEM arising from the Hamiltonian impact system with separable unimodal potential and a horizontal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The perturbed FCEM arising from the Hamiltonian impact system with separable unimodal potential and a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A perturbed family of interval exchange maps (FIEMs) provides a natural two-\linebreak{}dimensional area-preserving extension of interval exchange maps, with each IEM parameterized by an action variable $y$. Such families arise, for example, as models for iso-energy return maps of perturbed pseudointegrable Hamiltonian impact systems. These maps inherit a time-reversal symmetry, motivating the study of symmetric FIEMs. In the unperturbed case, the dynamics are generically uniquely ergodic for almost every value of $y$, while a dense set of action values supports periodic intervals. Exploiting time-reversal symmetry, we characterize these intervals and show that symmetric periodic orbits correspond to their midpoints. Under perturbation, the action variable is no longer conserved and generically periodic intervals break into isolated elliptic or hyperbolic periodic orbits. For sufficiently small perturbations, symmetric periodic orbits persist and can be located by a one-dimensional search along symmetry lines. Associated bifurcations generating symmetric and asymmetric periodic orbits are described and connected to those of the standard map, viewed here as a perturbed family of two-interval exchange maps.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces perturbed families of interval exchange maps (FIEMs) as two-dimensional area-preserving extensions of classical interval exchange maps, with each IEM parameterized by an action variable y. These arise as iso-energy return maps of perturbed pseudointegrable Hamiltonian impact systems. The maps inherit time-reversal symmetry, which is used to characterize periodic intervals in the unperturbed case (where dynamics are generically uniquely ergodic for almost every y, but a dense set supports periodic intervals) and to show that symmetric periodic orbits correspond to their midpoints. Under small perturbations, periodic intervals break into isolated elliptic or hyperbolic periodic orbits; symmetric orbits persist and can be located by a one-dimensional search along symmetry lines. Bifurcations generating symmetric and asymmetric orbits are described and connected to those of the standard map, interpreted as a perturbed family of two-interval exchange maps.

Significance. If the persistence and bifurcation results hold, the work supplies a symmetry-based framework for analyzing perturbations of interval exchange maps, with direct relevance to area-preserving maps and Hamiltonian systems. The reduction of symmetric-orbit search to symmetry lines via time-reversal symmetry is a concrete technical contribution that enables explicit computation. The explicit link to the standard map supplies a testable family of examples. No free parameters or ad-hoc axioms are introduced; the claims rest on standard reversible-map persistence arguments.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the token 'two-\linebreak{}dimensional' is a formatting artifact and should be replaced by 'two-dimensional'.
  2. [§2 or §3] The manuscript should include a precise definition of the perturbed FIEM family (including the explicit form of the perturbation) early in §2 or §3 so that the inheritance of time-reversal symmetry can be verified directly from the formulas.
  3. [Section on persistence] A short remark clarifying whether the one-dimensional search along symmetry lines remains valid only for sufficiently small perturbations or holds more generally would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive and accurate summary of our work on perturbed families of symmetric interval exchange maps, as well as the recommendation for minor revision. No major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's derivation rests on the inheritance of time-reversal symmetry under perturbation, which directly enables the characterization of periodic intervals via midpoints and the reduction of symmetric orbit searches to one-dimensional symmetry lines. Persistence for small perturbations follows from standard fixed-point arguments for reversible maps, with no equations or claims reducing by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or self-citation chains. The standard-map example is introduced as an illustrative case of a perturbed two-interval exchange family rather than a load-bearing premise. The abstract and described claims contain independent mathematical content grounded in symmetry properties without internal circular reductions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full text would be required to audit the mathematical foundations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5716 in / 1179 out tokens · 41968 ms · 2026-06-29T10:02:04.057437+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Embeddings of interval exchange transformations into planar piecewise isometries

    P. Ashwin, A. Goetz, P. Peres, and A. Rodrigues. “Embeddings of interval exchange transformations into planar piecewise isometries”. In:Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems40.5 (2020), pp. 1153–1179. DOI: 10.1017/etds.2018.112

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2018.112 2020

  2. [2]

    Ergodic properties of compositions of interval exchange maps and rotations

    J. S. Athreya and M. Boshernitzan. “Ergodic properties of compositions of interval exchange maps and rotations”. In:Nonlinearity26.2 (2013), pp. 417–423

    2013

  3. [3]

    Impact Hamiltonian sys- tems and polygonal billiards

    L. Becker, S. Elliott, B. Firester, S. G. Cohen, M. Pnueli, and V. Rom-Kedar. “Impact Hamiltonian sys- tems and polygonal billiards”. In:Hamiltonian Systems: Dynamics, Analysis, Applications. Mathematical Sciences Research Institute Publications. Cambridge University Press, 2024, pp. 29–66.DOI: 10.1017/ 9781009320733

    2024

  4. [4]

    On the ergodicity of anti-symmetric skew products with singularities and its applications

    P. Berk, K. Fr ˛ aczek, and F. Trujillo. “On the ergodicity of anti-symmetric skew products with singularities and its applications”. In:Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems(2026), pp. 1–63

    2026

  5. [5]

    Billiards in Polygons

    C. Boldrighini, M. Keane, and F. Marchetti. “Billiards in Polygons”. In:The Annals of Probability6.4 (1978), pp. 532–540.URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2243120. 42I. Pazi and V. Rom-Kedar

    work page arXiv 1978

  6. [6]

    Rank two interval exchange transformations

    M. D. Boshernitzan. “Rank two interval exchange transformations”. In:Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems8.3 (1988), pp. 379–394.DOI: 10.1017/S0143385700004521

    work page doi:10.1017/s0143385700004521 1988

  7. [7]

    On the stability of periodic orbits of two-dimensional mappings

    T. Bountis and R. H. G. Helleman. “On the stability of periodic orbits of two-dimensional mappings”. In: Journal of Mathematical Physics22.9 (1981), pp. 1867–1877.DOI: 10.1063/1.525159

    work page doi:10.1063/1.525159 1981

  8. [8]

    On Periods of Interval Exchange Transformations

    J. S. Cánovas, A. Linero Bas, and G. Soler López. “On Periods of Interval Exchange Transformations”. In:Mathematics10.9 (2022).DOI: 10.3390/math10091487

    work page doi:10.3390/math10091487 2022

  9. [9]

    A generalization of the standard map and its statistical characterization

    K. Cetin, U. Tirnakli, and B. M. Boghosian. “A generalization of the standard map and its statistical characterization”. In:Scientific Reports12.1 (2022), p. 8575

    2022

  10. [10]

    Resonances and transport in the sawtooth map

    Q. Chen, I. Dana, J. Meiss, N. Murray, and I. Percival. “Resonances and transport in the sawtooth map”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena46.2 (1990), pp. 217–240.DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(90)90037-p

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(90)90037-p 1990

  11. [11]

    A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems

    B. V. Chirikov. “A universal instability of many-dimensional oscillator systems”. In:Physics Reports 52.5 (1979), pp. 263–379.DOI: 10.1016/0370-1573(79)90023-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-1573(79)90023-1 1979

  12. [12]

    Construction of invariant curves for some piecewise isometries

    N. Cockram, P. Ashwin, and A. Rodrigues. “Construction of invariant curves for some piecewise isometries”. In:Dynamical Systems(2025), pp. 1–24.DOI: 10.1080/14689367.2025.2514193

    work page doi:10.1080/14689367.2025.2514193 2025

  13. [13]

    On the Structure of Symmetric Periodic Solutions of Conservative Systems, with Applications

    R. De Vogelaere. “On the Structure of Symmetric Periodic Solutions of Conservative Systems, with Applications”. In:Contributions to the Theory of Nonlinear Oscillations, Volume IV. Ed. by S. Lefschetz. Vol. 41. United States: Princeton University Press, 1958, pp. 53–84.ISBN: 0691079323

    1958

  14. [14]

    On the existence of periodic invariant curves for analytic families of twist maps and billiards

    C. Fierobe and A. Sorrentino. “On the existence of periodic invariant curves for analytic families of twist maps and billiards”. In:Revista Matemática Iberoamericana(Nov. 2025).DOI: 10.4171/rmi/1595.URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.4171/rmi/1595

    work page doi:10.4171/rmi/1595.url: 2025

  15. [15]

    Deviation of ergodic averages for area-preserving flows on surfaces of higher genus

    G. Forni. “Deviation of ergodic averages for area-preserving flows on surfaces of higher genus”. In: Annals of Mathematics155.1 (2002), pp. 1–103.DOI: 10.2307/3062150

    work page doi:10.2307/3062150 2002

  16. [16]

    Solutions of the cohomological equation for area-preserving flows on compact surfaces of higher genus

    G. Forni. “Solutions of the cohomological equation for area-preserving flows on compact surfaces of higher genus”. In:Annals of Mathematics. Second Series 146.2 (1997), pp. 295–344.DOI: 10 . 2307 / 2951840

    1997

  17. [17]

    Non-uniform ergodic properties of Hamiltonian flows with impacts

    K. Fr ˛ aczek and V. Rom-Kedar. “Non-uniform ergodic properties of Hamiltonian flows with impacts”. In: Ergodic theory and dynamical systems43.1 (2023), pp. 190–252.DOI: 10.1017/etds.2021.106

    work page doi:10.1017/etds.2021.106 2023

  18. [18]

    Dynamics of piecewise isometries

    A. Goetz. “Dynamics of piecewise isometries”. In:Illinois Journal of Mathematics44.3 (2000), pp. 465– 478.DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1256060408

    work page doi:10.1215/ijm/1256060408 2000

  19. [19]

    A method for determining a stochastic transition

    J. M. Greene. “A method for determining a stochastic transition”. In:Journal of Mathematical Physics 20.6 (1979), pp. 1183–1201.DOI: 10.1063/1.524170

    work page doi:10.1063/1.524170 1979

  20. [20]

    The Calculation of KAM Surfaces

    J. M. Greene. “The Calculation of KAM Surfaces”. In:Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 357.1 (1980), pp. 80–89.DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb29678.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1980.tb29678.x 1980

  21. [21]

    Guckenheimer and P

    J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes.Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields. Springer New York, 1983.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1140-2 1983

  22. [22]

    Transitive circle exchange transfor- mations with flips

    C. Gutierrez, S. Lloyd, V. Medvedev, B. Pires, and E. Zhuzhoma. “Transitive circle exchange transfor- mations with flips”. In:Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems26.1 (2010), pp. 251–263.DOI: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.251

    work page doi:10.3934/dcds.2010.26.251 2010

  23. [23]

    In: Dragoni, M., et al

    K. Inoue and H. Nakada. “A Piecewise Rotation of the Circle, IPR Maps and Their Connection with Translation Surfaces”. In:Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems in their Interactions with Arithmetics and Combinatorics. Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 393–431.DOI: 10.1007/978- 3- 319- 74908-2_19

    work page doi:10.1007/978- 2018

  24. [24]

    Interval exchange transformations

    M. Keane. “Interval exchange transformations”. In:Mathematische Zeitschrift141.1 (1975), pp. 25–31. DOI: 10.1007/BF01236981

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01236981 1975

  25. [25]

    Lyapunov exponents and Hodge theory

    M. Kontsevich and A. Zorich. “Lyapunov exponents and Hodge theory”. In: ed. by C. Itzykson, J. Drouffe, and J. Zuber. Vol. 1. The Mathematical Beauty of Physics: A Memorial Volume for Claude Itzykson. World Scientific, 1997.URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9701164

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  26. [26]

    Time-reversal symmetry in dynamical systems: A survey

    J. S. Lamb and J. A. Roberts. “Time-reversal symmetry in dynamical systems: A survey”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena112.1 (1998). Proceedings of the Workshop on Time-Reversal Symmetry in Dynamical Systems, pp. 1–39.DOI: 10.1016/S0167-2789(97)00199-1

    work page doi:10.1016/s0167-2789(97)00199-1 1998

  27. [27]

    Lichtenberg and M

    A. Lichtenberg and M. Lieberman.Regular and chaotic dynamics. 2nd ed. Vol. 38. Applied mathematical sciences. Springer, 1992.DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2184-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2184-3 1992

  28. [28]

    Lichtenberg.Determination of the transition between adiabatic and stochastic motion

    A. Lichtenberg.Determination of the transition between adiabatic and stochastic motion. Ecole Polytech- nique., 1979, pp. 13–40

    1979

  29. [29]

    Converse KAM: Theory and practice

    R. S. MacKay and I. C. Percival. “Converse KAM: Theory and practice”. In:Communications in Mathematical Physics98.4 (1985), pp. 469–512.DOI: 10.1007/BF01209326. Perturbed Families of Symmetric Interval Exchange Maps43

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01209326 1985

  30. [30]

    MacKay.Renormalisation in Area-preserving Maps

    R. MacKay.Renormalisation in Area-preserving Maps. Advanced series in nonlinear dynamics. World Scientific, 1993.DOI: 10.1142/2001

    work page doi:10.1142/2001 1993

  31. [31]

    Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps

    S. Marmi, P. Moussa, and J.-C. Yoccoz. “Linearization of generalized interval exchange maps”. In:Annals of Mathematics176.3 (2012), pp. 1583–1646.DOI: 10.4007/annals.2012.176.3.5

    work page doi:10.4007/annals.2012.176.3.5 2012

  32. [32]

    The cohomological equation for interval exchange maps

    S. Marmi, P. Moussa, and J.-C. Yoccoz. “The cohomological equation for interval exchange maps”. In: Journal of the American Mathematical Society18.4 (2005), pp. 823–872.DOI: 10.1090/S0894-0347-05- 00490-X

    work page doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-05- 2005

  33. [33]

    A Short Introduction to Translation Surfaces, Veech Surfaces, and Teichmüller Dynamics

    D. Massart. “A Short Introduction to Translation Surfaces, Veech Surfaces, and Teichmüller Dynamics”. In:Surveys in Geometry I. Ed. by A. Papadopoulos. Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 343– 388.DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-86695-2_9

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-86695-2_9 2022

  34. [34]

    Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations

    H. Masur. “Interval exchange transformations and measured foliations”. In:Annals of Mathematics115.1 (1982), pp. 169–200.DOI: 10.2307/1971341

    work page doi:10.2307/1971341 1982

  35. [35]

    Rational billiards and flat structures

    H. Masur and S. Tabachnikov. “Rational billiards and flat structures”. In: ed. by B. Hasselblatt and A. Katok. Vol. 1. Handbook of Dynamical Systems. Elsevier Science, 2002, pp. 1015–1089.DOI: 10.1016/ S1874-575X(02)80015-7

    2002

  36. [36]

    Symplectic maps, variational principles, and transport

    J. D. Meiss. “Symplectic maps, variational principles, and transport”. In:Rev. Mod. Phys.64 (3 1992), pp. 795–848.DOI: 10.1103/RevModPhys.64.795

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.64.795 1992

  37. [37]

    Meyer and D

    K. Meyer and D. Offin.Introduction to Hamiltonian Dynamical Systems and the N-Body Problem. Springer, 2017.DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-53691-0

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-53691-0 2017

  38. [38]

    Bifurcation of the period-4 orbits in the standard map

    W. Murakami, C. Murakami, and Y. Nomura. “Bifurcation of the period-4 orbits in the standard map”. In:Chaos, Solitons & Fractals12.10 (2001), pp. 1851–1859.DOI: 10.1016/S0960-0779(00)00151-X

    work page doi:10.1016/s0960-0779(00)00151-x 2001

  39. [39]

    Mechanically Inspired Foliation of the 3-Sphere by Higher-Genus Surfaces

    I. Pazi, V. Rom-Kedar, and S. Tanny. “Mechanically Inspired Foliation of the 3-Sphere by Higher-Genus Surfaces”. In: (2025). preprint

    2025

  40. [40]

    Hovering Sets in Near Pseudo-Integrable Hamiltonian Impact Systems

    I. Pazi, A. Zobova, and V. Rom-Kedar. “Hovering Sets in Near Pseudo-Integrable Hamiltonian Impact Systems”. In: (2025). preprint

    2025

  41. [41]

    On the symmetry lines of the standard mapping

    E. Piña and L. J. Lara. “On the symmetry lines of the standard mapping”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena26.1 (1987), pp. 369–378.DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(87)90236-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(87)90236-3 1987

  42. [42]

    Poincaré.Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste

    H. Poincaré.Les méthodes nouvelles de la mécanique céleste. Vol. 1. Gauthier-Villars, 1892

  43. [43]

    Pseudointegrable systems in classical and quantum mechanics

    P. Richens and M. Berry. “Pseudointegrable systems in classical and quantum mechanics”. In:Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena2.3 (1981), pp. 495–512.DOI: 10.1016/0167-2789(81)90024-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0167-2789(81)90024-5 1981

  44. [44]

    Dynamics of some piecewise smooth Fermi-Ulam models

    J. de Simoi and D. Dolgopyat. “Dynamics of some piecewise smooth Fermi-Ulam models”. In:Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science22.2 (2012).DOI: 10.1063/1.3695379

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3695379 2012

  45. [45]

    W. A. Strauss.Partial differential equations: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons, 2007

    2007

  46. [46]

    Non-Symmetric Periodic Points in Reversible Maps: Examples from the Standard Map

    K. Tanikawa and Y. Yamaguchi. “Non-Symmetric Periodic Points in Reversible Maps: Examples from the Standard Map”. In:Progress of Theoretical Physics108.6 (2002), pp. 987–997.DOI: 10.1143/PTP. 108.987

    work page doi:10.1143/ptp 2002

  47. [47]

    Gauss measures for transformations on the space of interval exchange maps

    W. A. Veech. “Gauss measures for transformations on the space of interval exchange maps”. In:Annals of Mathematics115.2 (1982), pp. 201–242.DOI: 10.2307/1971391

    work page doi:10.2307/1971391 1982

  48. [48]

    Ergodic theory of interval exchange maps

    M. Viana. “Ergodic theory of interval exchange maps”. In:Revista Matemática Complutense19.1 (2006), pp. 7–100

    2006

  49. [49]

    Continued Fraction Algorithms for Interval Exchange Maps: an Introduction

    J.-C. Yoccoz. “Continued Fraction Algorithms for Interval Exchange Maps: an Introduction”. In:Fron- tiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry I. Springer, 2006, pp. 401–435.ISBN: 9783540231899

    2006

  50. [50]

    Deviation for interval exchange transformations

    A. Zorich. “Deviation for interval exchange transformations”. In:Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 17.6 (1997), pp. 1477–1499

    1997

  51. [51]

    Flat Surfaces

    A. Zorich. “Flat Surfaces”. In:Frontiers in Number Theory, Physics, and Geometry I. Springer, 2006, pp. 437–583.ISBN: 9783540231899

    2006