pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.28698 · v1 · pith:G57KAQJTnew · submitted 2026-05-27 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Magnetic order, magnons, and crystal fields in van der Waals CeSiI

Wolfgang Simeth , Connor A. Occhialini , Michael E. Ziebel , Nethmi W. Hewage , Sabrina J. Li , Daniel Pajerowski , Taehun Kim , Ben Zager
show 7 more authors
Jonathan Pelliciari Kipton Barros Daniel Rehn Abhay N. Pasupathy Valentina Bisogni Xavier Roy Allen Scheie
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 09:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords CeSiIvan der Waalsheavy fermionmagnonscrystal electric fieldHeisenberg modelspin cycloidsuperconductivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Isotropic Heisenberg interactions on a quasi-two-dimensional lattice explain the low-energy magnon spectrum in CeSiI and stabilize a co-rotating spin cycloid.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses neutron scattering and resonant X-ray spectroscopy to measure crystal-field excitations and magnons in the van der Waals heavy-fermion material CeSiI. It shows that an effective Hamiltonian consisting of isotropic Heisenberg spin interactions on a layered lattice, with ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor coupling as the strongest term, reproduces the observed low-energy dynamics. The same model accounts for the magnetic order as a co-rotating spin cycloid. A reader would care because CeSiI is also a superconductor, so a working spin model supplies the microscopic starting point needed to connect magnetism to superconductivity and possible quantum criticality. The work supplies concrete effective Hamiltonians for both crystal fields and magnons.

Core claim

Isotropic Heisenberg interactions on a quasi two dimensional lattice, including ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor exchange as the dominant interaction, provide an excellent account to the low-energy measured dynamics and stabilize a co-rotating spin cycloid.

What carries the argument

The isotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian on a quasi-2D lattice with dominant ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor exchange, which fits the magnon spectrum and selects the observed cycloidal order.

If this is right

  • The extracted crystal-field levels and exchange parameters supply a concrete effective model that can be used for first-principles calculations of CeSiI.
  • The same Hamiltonian provides a microscopic basis for modeling the material's heavy-fermion behavior, unconventional superconductivity, and quantum criticality.
  • The co-rotating spin cycloid is a direct consequence of the dominant ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor coupling on the layered lattice.
  • The quasi-two-dimensional character of the interactions implies that interlayer coupling is weak compared with in-plane exchange.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the localized-moment description remains valid, then CeSiI offers a platform where heavy-fermion effects can be tuned by pressure or doping without immediately destroying the Heisenberg magnons.
  • The co-rotating cycloid may produce characteristic signatures in the spin texture that could be detected by scanning tunneling microscopy or in transport under magnetic fields.
  • Extending the same fitting procedure to higher-energy excitations could reveal the crossover from localized to itinerant behavior that is left outside the present low-energy window.

Load-bearing premise

The low-energy magnetic excitations are fully captured by a localized-moment Heisenberg Hamiltonian without significant Kondo screening or itinerant-electron effects at the energies probed by the neutron and resonant X-ray measurements.

What would settle it

A measured magnon dispersion that deviates substantially from the Heisenberg-model prediction at energies below 2 meV, or the appearance of Kondo-like broadening in the low-energy spectrum, would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.28698 by Abhay N. Pasupathy, Allen Scheie, Ben Zager, Connor A. Occhialini, Daniel Pajerowski, Daniel Rehn, Jonathan Pelliciari, Kipton Barros, Michael E. Ziebel, Nethmi W. Hewage, Sabrina J. Li, Taehun Kim, Valentina Bisogni, Wolfgang Simeth, Xavier Roy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Trigonal crystal structure of CeSiI and conven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Crystal electric field (CEF) analysis of CeSiI, inelastic neutron scattering, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and resonant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnon dynamics in CeSiI. (a,b) Powder spectrocopy data of CeSiI taken at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report neutron, X-ray absorption, and resonant X-ray spectroscopy of magnetic excitations in the new heavy-fermion van-der-Waals superconductor CeSiI. We determined effective Hamiltonians and ground states of crystal electric fields and magnons. Isotropic Heisenberg interactions on a quasi two dimensional lattice, including ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor exchange as the dominant interaction, provide an excellent account to the low-energy measured dynamics and stabilize a co-rotating spin cycloid. Our study provides the basis to model CeSiI from first principles, thereby laying the ground for microscopic understanding of heavy-fermion physics, their unconventional superconductivity, and quantum criticality.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports neutron scattering, X-ray absorption, and resonant inelastic X-ray scattering measurements on the van der Waals heavy-fermion superconductor CeSiI. It determines the crystal-electric-field level scheme and models the low-energy magnon excitations with an isotropic Heisenberg Hamiltonian on a quasi-two-dimensional lattice, in which ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor exchange is the dominant interaction. The model is stated to give an excellent account of the measured dynamics and to stabilize the observed co-rotating spin cycloid; the work is positioned as a foundation for first-principles modeling of the material’s heavy-fermion physics, superconductivity, and quantum criticality.

Significance. If the central claims are substantiated with quantitative evidence, the result supplies a concrete, low-parameter microscopic model for magnetic interactions in a new van der Waals heavy-fermion platform. The multi-technique constraint of both CEF and exchange parameters, together with the explicit restriction to low-energy localized-moment physics, constitutes a useful starting point for subsequent theoretical studies of superconductivity and quantum criticality in this class of materials.

major comments (2)
  1. [Magnon dispersion modeling and associated figures] The abstract and the sections presenting the magnon modeling assert that the isotropic Heisenberg model provides an 'excellent account' of the low-energy dynamics, yet no quantitative fit metrics (χ², R², residual analysis, or parameter uncertainties) or comparison against alternative models (e.g., with single-ion anisotropy or additional longer-range terms) are supplied. This absence makes the strength of the central claim difficult to evaluate independently.
  2. [Ground-state calculation from exchange parameters] The claim that the fitted interactions 'stabilize' the co-rotating spin cycloid is obtained from the same exchange parameters that were determined by fitting the measured magnon spectrum. The manuscript should clarify whether the cycloidal order itself was established independently (e.g., by elastic neutron diffraction Bragg peaks) or whether the ground-state calculation is solely a consistency check; without this distinction the stabilization statement risks circularity.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Exchange and CEF parameter sections] A table listing the two fitted exchange parameters, their uncertainties, and the CEF level scheme would improve clarity and reproducibility.
  2. [Figure captions] Figure captions for the dispersion plots should explicitly state the momentum paths, energy resolution, and temperature at which the neutron and RIXS data were acquired.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the detailed, constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Magnon dispersion modeling and associated figures] The abstract and the sections presenting the magnon modeling assert that the isotropic Heisenberg model provides an 'excellent account' of the low-energy dynamics, yet no quantitative fit metrics (χ², R², residual analysis, or parameter uncertainties) or comparison against alternative models (e.g., with single-ion anisotropy or additional longer-range terms) are supplied. This absence makes the strength of the central claim difficult to evaluate independently.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative fit metrics and model comparisons are needed for independent assessment. In the revised manuscript we will report the χ² of the magnon dispersion fit, the estimated uncertainties on the exchange parameters, and a short comparison showing that adding single-ion anisotropy or longer-range couplings does not meaningfully improve the description within the resolution of the data. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Ground-state calculation from exchange parameters] The claim that the fitted interactions 'stabilize' the co-rotating spin cycloid is obtained from the same exchange parameters that were determined by fitting the measured magnon spectrum. The manuscript should clarify whether the cycloidal order itself was established independently (e.g., by elastic neutron diffraction Bragg peaks) or whether the ground-state calculation is solely a consistency check; without this distinction the stabilization statement risks circularity.

    Authors: The co-rotating spin cycloid was determined independently from elastic neutron diffraction Bragg peaks (presented in the elastic scattering section). The Heisenberg parameters were obtained exclusively from the inelastic magnon spectrum; the subsequent classical ground-state calculation serves only as a consistency check that these parameters indeed favor the observed structure. We will revise the text to make this separation explicit and remove any ambiguity. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model fit is consistency check against independently observed order

full rationale

The paper determines the magnetic order (co-rotating spin cycloid) from neutron and resonant X-ray measurements, extracts CEF levels and fits two exchange parameters of an isotropic Heisenberg model to the measured low-energy magnon dispersion, then verifies that the fitted model stabilizes the observed order. This is a standard consistency validation rather than a reduction by construction, as the order is not derived solely from the same fitted spectrum but reported as an independent experimental input. No self-definitional equations, fitted-input predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear; the central claim remains self-contained with external data benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an effective spin Hamiltonian whose parameters are determined by fitting to new spectroscopic data; no new particles or forces are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • nearest-neighbor Heisenberg exchange
    Dominant interaction strength adjusted to reproduce the measured low-energy magnon dispersion.
  • longer-range exchange parameters
    Additional couplings included in the isotropic Heisenberg model and fitted to data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Magnetic excitations at the probed energies can be described by a localized-moment effective spin Hamiltonian
    Standard assumption in the field for rare-earth compounds; invoked when mapping measured spectra to the Heisenberg model.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5700 in / 1316 out tokens · 37185 ms · 2026-06-29T09:50:44.831060+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Validation Framework for Quantum Simulation of Spin Dynamics against Inelastic Neutron Scattering and Classical Simulation

    quant-ph 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Develops a validation framework for quantum spin dynamics simulations anchored by neutron scattering and classical methods, using observable maps, uncertainty propagation, robustness tests, and actuator-aware feedback.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Quan- tum Fluctuations in Narrow-Band Systems

    Fit- ting to the experimental data yields three possible Hamil- toniansandgroundstatewave-functions(seeSI[34])that describe the neutron data equally well but which display different sequences of excited state levels. Toadjudicatebetweenthesethreepossibilities, weturn to the XAS (circles) in Fig. 2(e). The pronounced double-peak centered around 882eV corre...

  2. [2]

    C. L. Kane and E. J. Mele, Quantum Spin Hall Effect in Graphene, Physical Review Letters95, 226801 (2005)

    2005

  3. [3]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, S. Fang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E.Kaxiras,andP.Jarillo-Herrero,Unconventionalsuper- conductivity in magic-angle graphene superlattices, Na- ture556, 43 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Park, J.-G

    J.-U.Lee, S.Lee, J.H.Ryoo, S.Kang, T.Y.Kim, P.Kim, C.-H. Park, J.-G. Park, and H. Cheong, Ising-Type Mag- netic Ordering in Atomically Thin FePS3, Nano Letters 16, 7433 (2016)

    2016

  5. [5]

    K. F. Mak and J. Shan, Photonics and optoelectronics of 2D semiconductor transition metal dichalcogenides, Na- ture Photonics10, 216 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    V. Vaňo, M. Amini, S. C. Ganguli, G. Chen, J. L. Lado, S. Kezilebieke, and P. Liljeroth, Artificial heavy fermions in a van der Waals heterostructure, Nature599, 582 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Mizukami, H

    Y. Mizukami, H. Shishido, T. Shibauchi, M. Shi- 6 mozawa, S. Yasumoto, D. Watanabe, M. Yamashita, H. Ikeda, T. Terashima, H. Kontani, and Y. Matsuda, Extremely strong-coupling superconductivity in artificial two-dimensional Kondo lattices, Nature Physics7, 849 (2011)

    2011

  8. [8]

    Kosterlitz and D

    J. Kosterlitz and D. Thouless, Chapter5 two-dimensional physics (Elsevier, 1978) pp. 371–433

    1978

  9. [9]

    C. Gong, L. Li, Z. Li, H. Ji, A. Stern, Y. Xia, T. Cao, W. Bao, C. Wang, Y. Wang, Z. Q. Qiu, R. J. Cava, S. G. Louie, J. Xia, and X. Zhang, Discovery of intrinsic fer- romagnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals crystals, Nature546, 265 (2017)

    2017

  10. [10]

    Huang, G

    B. Huang, G. Clark, E. Navarro-Moratalla, D. R. Klein, R. Cheng, K. L. Seyler, D. Zhong, E. Schmidgall, M. A. McGuire, D. H. Cobden, W. Yao, D. Xiao, P. Jarillo- Herrero, and X. Xu, Layer-dependent ferromagnetism in a van der Waals crystal down to the monolayer limit, Nature546, 270 (2017)

    2017

  11. [11]

    K. S. Burch, D. Mandrus, and J.-G. Park, Magnetism in two-dimensional van der Waals materials, Nature563, 47 (2018)

    2018

  12. [12]

    M. E. Ziebel, M. L. Feuer, J. Cox, X. Zhu, C. R. Dean, and X. Roy, CrSBr: An Air-Stable, Two-Dimensional Magnetic Semiconductor, Nano Letters24, 4319 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    S. M. Thomas, A. E. Llacsahuanga, W. Simeth, C. S. Kengle, F. Orlandi, D. Khalyavin, P. Manuel, F. Ron- ning, E. D. Bauer, J. D. Thompson, J.-X. Zhu, A. O. Scheie, Y. P. Chen, and P. F. S. Rosa, Enhanced two- dimensional ferromagnetism in van der Waalsβ-UTe 3 monolayers (2025), arXiv:2506.15667 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    K. S. Novoselov, A. Mishchenko, A. Carvalho, and A. H. Castro Neto, 2D materials and van der Waals het- erostructures, Science353, aac9439 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Y. Liu, N. O. Weiss, X. Duan, H.-C. Cheng, Y. Huang, and X. Duan, Van der Waals heterostructures and de- vices, Nature Reviews Materials1, 16042 (2016)

    2016

  16. [16]

    Jariwala, A

    D. Jariwala, A. R. Davoyan, J. Wong, and H. A. Atwa- ter, Van der Waals Materials for Atomically-Thin Photo- voltaics: Promise and Outlook, ACS Photonics4, 2962 (2017)

    2017

  17. [17]

    P. G. Zotev, P. Bouteyre, Y. Wang, S. A. Rander- son, X. Hu, L. Sortino, Y. Wang, T. Shegai, S.-H. Gong, A. Tittl, I. Aharonovich, and A. I. Tartakovskii, Nanophotonics with multilayer van der Waals materials, Nature Photonics19, 788 (2025)

    2025

  18. [18]

    B. G. Jang, C. Lee, J.-X. Zhu, and J. H. Shim, Exploring two-dimensional van der Waals heavy-fermion material: Data mining theoretical approach, npj 2D Materials and Applications6, 80 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Kundu, C

    V.A.Posey, S.Turkel, M.Rezaee, A.Devarakonda, A.K. Kundu, C. S. Ong, M. Thinel, D. G. Chica, R. A. Vi- talone, R. Jing,et al., Two-dimensional heavy fermions in the van der Waals metal CeSiI, Nature625, 483 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    T. Shi, W. Li, Q. Dong, P. Yang, H. Ma, Z. Tian, N. Wang, J. Sun, Y. Uwatoko, Y.-f. Yang, B. Wang, H. Lei, and J. Cheng, Superconductivity under pres- sure in the two-dimensional van der Waals heavy-fermion metal CeSiI (2026), arXiv:2601.18476 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    Kallin and J

    C. Kallin and J. Berlinsky, Chiral superconductors, Re- ports on Progress in Physics79, 054502 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    S. D. Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quan- tum Information1, 15001 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    Karzig, C

    T. Karzig, C. Knapp, R. M. Lutchyn, P. Bonder- son, M. B. Hastings, C. Nayak, J. Alicea, K. Flens- berg, S. Plugge, Y. Oreg, C. M. Marcus, and M. H. Freedman, Scalable designs for quasiparticle-poisoning- protected topological quantum computation with Majo- rana zero modes, Physical Review B95, 235305 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Sato and Y

    M. Sato and Y. Ando, Topological superconductors: A review, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 076501 (2017)

    2017

  25. [25]

    Yadav, C

    A. Yadav, C. M. Acosta, G. M. Dalpian, and O. I. Ma- lyi, First-principles investigations of 2D materials: Chal- lenges and best practices, Matter6, 2711 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    Stoudenmire and S

    E. Stoudenmire and S. R. White, Studying two- dimensional systems with the density matrix renormal- ization group, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics3, 111 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    Quantum Monte Carlo studies of U(1) lattice gauge models of Kondo breakdown

    G. Pan and F. F. Assaad, Quantum monte carlo studies of U(1) lattice gauge models of kondo breakdown, arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17801 10.48550/arXiv.2512.17801 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.17801 2025

  28. [28]

    Monthoux, D

    P. Monthoux, D. Pines, and G. G. Lonzarich, Supercon- ductivity without phonons, Nature450, 1177 (2007)

    2007

  29. [29]

    Turkel, V

    S. Turkel, V. A. Posey, C. S. Ong, S. Ghosh, X. Huang, A. K. Kundu, E. Vescovo, D. G. Chica, P. Thunström, O. Eriksson, W. Simeth, A. Scheie, A. Rubio, A. J. Millis, X. Roy, and A. N. Pasupathy, Nodal hybridization in a two-dimensional heavy-fermion material, Nature Physics 21, 1949 (2025)

    1949

  30. [30]

    R.Okuma,MagneticfrustrationinavanderWaalsmetal CeSiI, Physical Review Materials5, 10.1103/PhysRev- Materials.5.L121401 (2021)

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev- 2021

  31. [31]

    G. L. Squires,Introduction to the Theory of Thermal Neutron Scattering, 3rd ed. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    Ehlers, A

    G. Ehlers, A. A. Podlesnyak, J. L. Niedziela, E. B. Iver- son, and P. E. Sokol, The new cold neutron chopper spec- trometer at the spallation neutron source: Design and performance,ReviewofScientificInstruments82,085108 (2011)

    2011

  33. [33]

    T. E. Mason, D. Abernathy, I. Anderson, J. Ankner, T. Egami, G. Ehlers, A. Ekkebus, G. Granroth, M. Ha- gen, K. Herwig, J. Hodges, C. Hoffmann, C. Horak, L. Horton, F. Klose, J. Larese, A. Mesecar, D. Myles, J. Neuefeind, M. Ohl, C. Tulk, X.-L. Wang, and J. Zhao, The Spallation Neutron Source in Oak Ridge: A pow- erful tool for materials research, Physica...

    2006

  34. [35]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for more details of the experiments and calcu- lations

  35. [36]

    Scheie, Pycrystalfield: software for calculation, analy- sis and fitting of crystal electric field hamiltonians, Jour- nal of Applied Crystallography54(2021)

    A. Scheie, Pycrystalfield: software for calculation, analy- sis and fitting of crystal electric field hamiltonians, Jour- nal of Applied Crystallography54(2021)

    2021

  36. [37]

    K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix elements and operator equiva- lentsconnectedwiththemagneticpropertiesofrareearth ions, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A65, 209 (1952)

    1952

  37. [38]

    Hansmann, A

    P. Hansmann, A. Severing, Z. Hu, M. W. Haverkort, C. F. Chang, S. Klein, A. Tanaka, H. H. Hsieh, H.-J. Lin, C. T. Chen, B. Fåk, P. Lejay, and L. H. Tjeng, Determin- ing the Crystal-Field Ground State in Rare Earth Heavy 7 Fermion Materials Using Soft-X-Ray Absorption Spec- troscopy, Physical Review Letters100, 066405 (2008)

    2008

  38. [39]

    Willers, F

    T. Willers, F. Strigari, Z. Hu, V. Sessi, N. B. Brookes, E. D. Bauer, J. L. Sarrao, J. D. Thompson, A. Tanaka, S. Wirth, L. H. Tjeng, and A. Severing, Correlation between ground state and orbital anisotropy in heavy fermion materials, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112, 2384 (2015)

    2015

  39. [40]

    D. S. Christovam, M. Ferreira-Carvalho, A. Marino, M. Sundermann, D. Takegami, A. Melendez-Sans, K. D. Tsuei, Z. Hu, S. Rößler, M. Valvidares, M. W. Haverkort, Y. Liu, E. D. Bauer, L. H. Tjeng, G. Zwicknagl, and A. Severing, Spectroscopic Evidence of Kondo-Induced Quasiquartet inCeRh2As2, Physical ReviewLetters132, 046401 (2024)

    2024

  40. [41]

    M. W. Haverkort, M. Zwierzycki, and O. K. Ander- sen, Multiplet ligand-field theory using Wannier orbitals, Physical Review B85, 165113 (2012)

    2012

  41. [42]

    Amorese, G

    A. Amorese, G. Dellea, M. Fanciulli, S. Seiro, C. Geibel, C. Krellner, I. P. Makarova, L. Braicovich, G. Ghir- inghelli, D. V. Vyalikh, N. B. Brookes, and K. Kummer, 4fexcitations in Ce Kondo lattices studied by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, Physical Review B93, 165134 (2016)

    2016

  42. [43]

    S. Horn, E. Holland-Moritz, M. Loewenhaupt, F. Steglich, H. Scheuer, A. Benoit, and J. Flou- quet, Magnetic neutron scattering and crystal-field states in CeCu2Si2, Physical Review B23, 3171 (1981)

    1981

  43. [44]

    W. a. C. Erkelens and R. Leiden (Netherlands),Elastic and Inelastic Neutron Scattering Studies on 3d and 4f Magnetic Compounds, Tech. Rep. INIS-mf–11365 (Rijk- suniversiteit Leiden (Netherlands), 1987)

    1987

  44. [45]

    B. H. Grier, J. M. Lawrence, S. Horn, and J. D. Thomp- son, Inelastic magnetic neutron scattering in CeT 2Si2 (T=Au, Pd, Ru or Pt): Crystal fields and quasi-elastic scattering, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics21, 1099 (1988)

    1988

  45. [47]

    Vijayvargia, H

    A. Vijayvargia, H. Zhang, K. Barros, S.-Z. Lin, and O. Erten, Electric field driven spin textures in heavy fermion van der Waals magnets (2024), arXiv:2410.06344 [cond-mat]

    work page arXiv 2024

  46. [49]

    J. W. Allen and C. Y. Young, Magnetic anisotropy due to spin-orbit and dipole-dipole interactions in spin- density-wave antiferromagnets, Physical Review B16, 1103 (1977)

    1977

  47. [50]

    R. Chen, H. Ju, H.-C. Jiang, O. A. Starykh, and L. Ba- lents, Ground states of spin-1 2 triangular antiferromag- nets in a magnetic field, Physical Review B87, 165123 (2013)

    2013

  48. [51]

    Facheris, K

    L. Facheris, K. Yu. Povarov, S. D. Nabi, D. G. Mazzone, J. Lass, B. Roessli, E. Ressouche, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, and A. Zheludev, Spin Density Wave versus Fractional Magnetization Plateau in a Triangular Antiferromagnet, Physical Review Letters129, 087201 (2022)

    2022

  49. [52]

    P. Park, B. R. Ortiz, M. Sprague, A. P. Sakhya, S. A. Chen, M. D. Frontzek, W. Tian, R. Sibille, D. G. Maz- zone, C. Tabata, K. Kaneko, L. M. DeBeer-Schmitt, M. B. Stone, D. S. Parker, G. D. Samolyuk, H. Miao, M. Neupane, and A. D. Christianson, Spin density wave and van Hove singularity in the kagome metal CeTi3Bi4, Nature Communications16, 4384 (2025)

    2025

  50. [53]

    O. A. Starykh, H. Katsura, and L. Balents, Extreme sensitivity of a frustrated quantum magnet: Cs2CuCl4, Physical Review B82, 014421 (2010)

    2010

  51. [55]

    A. V. Chubukov and D. I. Golosov, Quantum theory of an antiferromagnet on a triangular lattice in a magnetic field, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter3, 69 (1991)

    1991

  52. [56]

    Coletta, T

    T. Coletta, T. A. Tóth, K. Penc, and F. Mila, Semiclas- sical theory of the magnetization process of the triangu- lar lattice Heisenberg model, Phys. Rev. B94, 075136 (2016). Supplemental material for: Magnetic order, magnons, and crystal fields in van-der-Waals CeSiI Wolfgang Simeth1, Connor A. Occhialini 2,3, Michael E. Ziebel 2,4, Nethmi W. Hewage 4, S...

    2016

  53. [57]

    UsingPyCrystalField[6] software, we fit theE i = 25 meV atT= 2 K powder inelastic neutron data over 1 ˚A −1 <|Q|<2 ˚A −1 . We began by calculating a point charge model [7] assuming effective charges Si to be −4eand I to be +e(ionic values assuming charge balance in CeSiI), and then scaling the CEF parameters by 0.1 so the CEF levels lie near the predicted...

  54. [58]

    For simulations on Hamiltonians including exclu- sively isotropic exchange, we worked with a system size that corresponds to the crystallo- graphic unit cell

    were carried out with the Julia based packageSunny[26]. For simulations on Hamiltonians including exclu- sively isotropic exchange, we worked with a system size that corresponds to the crystallo- graphic unit cell. Here,Sunnysimulations were based on the rotating frame formalism [27]. For Hamiltonians including anisotropic exchange or DM interactions, we ...

    1926

  55. [59]

    Ehlers, A

    G. Ehlers, A. A. Podlesnyak, J. L. Niedziela, E. B. Iverson, and P. E. Sokol, The new cold neutron chopper spectrometer at the spallation neutron source: Design and performance, Review of Scientific Instruments82, 085108 (2011)

    2011

  56. [60]

    T. E. Mason, D. Abernathy, I. Anderson, J. Ankner, T. Egami, G. Ehlers, A. Ekkebus, G. Granroth, M. Hagen, K. Herwig, J. Hodges, C. Hoffmann, C. Horak, L. Horton, F. Klose, J. Larese, A. Mesecar, D. Myles, J. Neuefeind, M. Ohl, C. Tulk, X.-L. Wang, and J. Zhao, The Spallation Neutron Source in Oak Ridge: A powerful tool for materials research, Physica B: ...

    2006

  57. [61]

    P. J. Brown, Magnetic form factors, The Cambridge Crystallographic Subroutine Library (1998)

    1998

  58. [62]

    V. A. Posey, S. Turkel, M. Rezaee, A. Devarakonda, A. K. Kundu, C. S. Ong, M. Thinel, D. G. Chica, R. A. Vitalone, R. Jing,et al., Two-dimensional heavy fermions in the van der Waals metal CeSiI, Nature625, 483 (2024)

    2024

  59. [63]

    K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix elements and operator equivalents connected with the magnetic properties of rare earth ions, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A65, 209 (1952)

    1952

  60. [64]

    Scheie, Pycrystalfield: software for calculation, analysis and fitting of crystal electric field hamiltonians, Journal of Applied Crystallography54(2021)

    A. Scheie, Pycrystalfield: software for calculation, analysis and fitting of crystal electric field hamiltonians, Journal of Applied Crystallography54(2021)

    2021

  61. [65]

    Hutchings, Point-charge calculations of energy levels of magnetic ions in crystalline electric fields, Solid State Physics Solid State Physics,16, 227 (1964)

    M. Hutchings, Point-charge calculations of energy levels of magnetic ions in crystalline electric fields, Solid State Physics Solid State Physics,16, 227 (1964)

    1964

  62. [66]

    A. O. Scheie, S. J. Li, S. D. Wilson, and D. A. Rehn, Explaining the extra crystal-field mode inaCeX 2 (a= k, rb, na;x= o, s, se, te), Phys. Rev. B112, 014415 (2025)

    2025

  63. [67]

    Scheie, Quantifying uncertainties in crystal electric field Hamiltonian fits to neutron data, SciPost Phys

    A. Scheie, Quantifying uncertainties in crystal electric field Hamiltonian fits to neutron data, SciPost Phys. Core5, 018 (2022)

    2022

  64. [68]

    Scheie, V

    A. Scheie, V. O. Garlea, L. D. Sanjeewa, J. Xing, and A. S. Sefat, Crystal-field hamiltonian and anisotropy in kerse 2 and cserse2, Phys. Rev. B101, 144432 (2020)

    2020

  65. [69]

    L. C. Lopes and B. Coqblin, Neutron-scattering spectra of noncubic cerium kondo compounds, Phys. Rev. B38, 6807 (1988)

    1988

  66. [70]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993). 26

    1993

  67. [71]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficient iterative schemes forab initiototal-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  68. [72]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  69. [73]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Norm-Conserving and Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials for First-Row and Transition Elements, J. Phys.: Condens.Matter6, 8245 (1994)

    1994

  70. [74]

    P. E. Bl¨ ochl, Projector Augmented-Wave Method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  71. [75]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, From Ultrasoft Pseudopotentials to the Projector Augmented-Wave Method, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  72. [76]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  73. [77]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for brillouin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  74. [78]

    A. Togo, L. Chaput, T. Tadano, and I. Tanaka, Implementation strategies in phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Condens. Matter35, 353001 (2023)

    2023

  75. [79]

    Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J

    A. Togo, First-principles phonon calculations with phonopy and phono3py, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 92, 012001 (2023)

    2023

  76. [80]

    Grimme, J

    S. Grimme, J. Antony, S. Ehrlich, and H. Krieg, A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (dft-d) for the 94 elements h-pu, The Journal of chemical physics132(2010)

    2010

  77. [81]

    Thalmeier and P

    P. Thalmeier and P. Fulde, Bound state between a crystal-field excitation and a phonon in CeAl2, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 1588 (1982)

    1982

  78. [82]

    Thalmeier, Theory of the bound state between phonons and a cef excitation in CeAl 2, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics17, 4153 (1984)

    P. Thalmeier, Theory of the bound state between phonons and a cef excitation in CeAl 2, Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics17, 4153 (1984)

    1984

  79. [83]

    Dvorak, I

    J. Dvorak, I. Jarrige, V. Bisogni, S. Coburn, and W. Leonhardt, Towards 10 meV resolution: The design of an ultrahigh resolution soft X-ray RIXS spectrometer, Review of Scientific Instruments87, 115109 (2016)

    2016

  80. [84]

    Sunny.jl: A Julia Package for Spin Dynamics,

    D. Dahlbom, H. Zhang, C. Miles, S. Quinn, A. Niraula, B. Thipe, M. Wilson, S. Matin, H. Mankad, S. Hahn, D. Pajerowski, S. Johnston, Z. Wang, H. Lane, Y. W. Li, X. Bai, M. Mourigal, C. D. Batista, and K. Barros, Sunny.jl: A Julia Package for Spin Dynamics (2025), arXiv:2501.13095 [quant-ph]. 27

    work page arXiv 2025

Showing first 80 references.