pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.30034 · v1 · pith:4JEP6VBTnew · submitted 2026-05-28 · 📊 stat.AP

Constructing Contact and Connectivity Matrices for Infectious Disease Modelling

Xiahui Li , Dongni Zhang , Neha Bansal , Jessica R.E. Bridgen , Chris Jewell , Emma McBryde , Glenn Marion , Emily Nixon
show 7 more authors
Philip D. O'Neill David J. Pascall Lorenzo Pellis Simon E.F. Spencer Panayiota Touloupou Lloyd Chapman Ben Swallow
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 23:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📊 stat.AP
keywords contact matricesconnectivity matricesinfectious disease modellingepidemiologymixing patternsheterogeneityuncertaintydisease spread
0
0 comments X

The pith

Contact matrices encode interaction frequencies between subpopulations and are reviewed for data types, methods, uncertainties, and challenges in infectious disease modeling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews existing literature on constructing contact matrices, which directly account for the frequency of interactions between different subpopulations and can encode dynamic heterogeneity across demographics, space, and time. It covers the data types used to build these matrices and the methods for incorporating uncertainties and heterogeneities. A sympathetic reader would care because these matrices are a fundamental component of modelling and inference for infectious disease epidemiology, helping inform outbreak control and forecast disease spread. The review also highlights remaining challenges and future directions.

Core claim

Contact matrices are a fundamental component of modelling and inference for infectious disease epidemiology. Their structure and parametrisation directly accounts for the frequency of interactions between different subpopulations of individuals, as well as having the potential to encode dynamic heterogeneity in these interactions across demographic axes, space and time. The paper reviews the existing literature on the data types used to construct contact matrices and the methods for incorporating uncertainties and heterogeneities into them, while highlighting remaining challenges and future directions in the use of these contact matrices for epidemiological research.

What carries the argument

Contact or connectivity matrices, which represent the frequency of interactions between different subpopulations and encode heterogeneities across axes.

If this is right

  • Outbreak control strategies can be informed by matrices that capture dynamic interaction frequencies.
  • Disease spread forecasts become more reliable when uncertainties and heterogeneities are incorporated into the matrices.
  • Research can target the highlighted remaining challenges to advance epidemiological modeling.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining multiple data sources could further reduce estimation uncertainties in practice.
  • Privacy protections on individual interaction data may constrain the resolution of future matrices.
  • Dynamic matrices updated in real time could support more adaptive responses during outbreaks.

Load-bearing premise

The body of existing literature covered is representative and sufficiently complete to identify all major data types, methods, and remaining challenges without critical omissions.

What would settle it

Discovery of a major omitted data type or construction method that would alter the identified challenges or future directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30034 by Ben Swallow, Chris Jewell, David J. Pascall, Dongni Zhang, Emily Nixon, Emma McBryde, Glenn Marion, Jessica R.E. Bridgen, Lloyd Chapman, Lorenzo Pellis, Neha Bansal, Panayiota Touloupou, Philip D. O'Neill, Simon E.F. Spencer, Xiahui Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example connectivity matrix. Colour shows the mean number of contacts each individual [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Stratified Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Modelling and inference approaches to incorporate uncertainty in connectiv￾ity matrices. Many existing studies use fixed connectivity matrices, despite multiple sources of uncertainty that should be accounted for. These uncertainties can be broadly classified into two types: epistemic uncertainty (reducible uncertainty in the connectivity matrix arising from lack of knowledge, incomplete data, or limitatio… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Mapping of different efforts to account for heterogeneity and uncertainty in connectivity matrices in the existing literature. Reviewed papers are listed according to model stratification (x-axis) and inference methods (y-axis), to identify research gaps. There are notably very few studies that perform joint inference of the connectivity matrix and epidemic state, and none that do so with fine-grained spat… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Contact (or mixing, or more generally connectivity) matrices are a fundamental component of modelling and inference for infectious disease epidemiology. Their structure and parametrisation directly accounts for the frequency of interactions between different subpopulations of individuals, as well as having the potential to encode dynamic heterogeneity in these interactions across demographic axes, space and time. Considerable research has been devoted to the structure and estimation of (components of) these matrices to help inform outbreak control and forecast disease spread. In this paper, we review the existing literature on the data types used to construct contact matrices and the methods for incorporating uncertainties and heterogeneities into them. We also highlight remaining challenges and future directions in the use of these contact matrices for epidemiological research.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews data types and methods for constructing contact and connectivity matrices in infectious disease epidemiology, methods for incorporating uncertainties and heterogeneities, and remaining challenges and future directions in their use for modeling and inference.

Significance. If the literature coverage is comprehensive and representative, the review could provide a useful synthesis of data sources (e.g., diary studies, sensors, mobility data) and estimation approaches for contact matrices, which are central to compartmental models and outbreak forecasting. However, the absence of any stated search strategy, inclusion criteria, or database sources in the abstract undermines the ability to assess completeness or identify potential omissions in data types or techniques.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim to 'review the existing literature' on data types, methods, uncertainties, and challenges is not supported by any description of search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of works reviewed, or databases queried. This is load-bearing for the central claim of the paper as a review, as it prevents verification that major sources (diary studies, proximity sensors, Bayesian hierarchical models, network approaches) are adequately covered without critical omissions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim to 'review the existing literature' on data types, methods, uncertainties, and challenges is not supported by any description of search strategy, inclusion/exclusion criteria, number of works reviewed, or databases queried. This is load-bearing for the central claim of the paper as a review, as it prevents verification that major sources (diary studies, proximity sensors, Bayesian hierarchical models, network approaches) are adequately covered without critical omissions.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from greater transparency regarding how the reviewed literature was identified. In the revised version, we will add a brief 'Literature search and selection' subsection (likely in the Introduction or a new Methods section) that describes the primary databases consulted (PubMed, Web of Science, arXiv), key search terms, and the criteria used to select representative studies across data types and modelling approaches. This addition will allow readers to evaluate coverage without altering the narrative-review character of the paper. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: review paper with no derivations or predictions

full rationale

This is a literature review summarizing data types, methods, and challenges for contact matrices in epidemiology. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or derivation chains that could reduce to self-definition or self-citation. All claims reference external literature rather than constructing results from the paper's own inputs. The representativeness assumption noted by the reader is a methodological limitation of reviews but does not constitute circularity under the defined patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper and does not introduce or depend on new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; any such elements would come from the cited works rather than this manuscript.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5698 in / 943 out tokens · 27468 ms · 2026-06-28T23:49:31.503029+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 83 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Delaying the COVID-19 epidemic in Australia: evaluating the effectiveness of international travel bans

    Adeshina Adekunle et al. “Delaying the COVID-19 epidemic in Australia: evaluating the effectiveness of international travel bans”. In:Australian and New Zealand journal of public health44.4 (2020), pp. 257–259.doi:10.1111/1753-6405.13016

    work page doi:10.1111/1753-6405.13016 2020

  2. [2]

    Who acquires infection from whom? A sensitivity analysis of trans- mission dynamics during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium

    Leonardo Angeli et al. “Who acquires infection from whom? A sensitivity analysis of trans- mission dynamics during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic in Belgium”. In:Journal of Theoretical Biology581 (2024), p. 111721.doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111721

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2024.111721 2024

  3. [3]

    Projecting social contact matrices to different demographic structures

    Sergio Arregui et al. “Projecting social contact matrices to different demographic structures”. In:PLoS computational biology14.12 (2018), e1006638.doi:10 . 1371 / journal . pcbi . 1006638

    2018

  4. [4]

    Dynamics of non-household contacts during the COVID-19 pan- demic in 2020 and 2021 in the Netherlands

    Jantien A Backer et al. “Dynamics of non-household contacts during the COVID-19 pan- demic in 2020 and 2021 in the Netherlands”. In:Scientific Reports13.1 (2023), p. 5166.doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32031-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-32031-7 2020

  5. [5]

    Modelling the medium-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmis- sion in England in the Omicron era

    Rosanna C Barnard et al. “Modelling the medium-term dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 transmis- sion in England in the Omicron era”. In:Nature communications13.1 (2022), p. 4879.doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32404-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32404-y 2022

  6. [6]

    The exciting potential and daunting challenge of using GPS human-mobility data for epidemic modeling

    Francisco Barreras and Duncan J Watts. “The exciting potential and daunting challenge of using GPS human-mobility data for epidemic modeling”. In:Nature Computational Science 4.6 (2024), pp. 398–411.doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00637-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00637-0 2024

  7. [7]

    The ambiguities of uncertainty: A review of uncertainty frameworks relevant to the assessment of environmental change

    Luke D. Bevan. “The ambiguities of uncertainty: A review of uncertainty frameworks relevant to the assessment of environmental change”. In:Futures137 (2022), p. 102919.issn: 0016- 3287.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2022.102919.url:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328722000180

    work page doi:10.1016/j.futures.2022.102919.url:https://www 2022

  8. [8]

    A Contact Matrix-Based Approach for Predicting COVID-19 Using Influenza Data

    Liu Bingchen, Tao Li, and Zhang Zili. “A Contact Matrix-Based Approach for Predicting COVID-19 Using Influenza Data”. In:2022 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Confer- ence on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT). IEEE. 2022, pp. 782– 787.doi:10.1109/WI-IAT55865.2022.00129. 22

    work page doi:10.1109/wi-iat55865.2022.00129 2022

  9. [9]

    Quantifying contact patterns in response to COVID-19 public health measures in Canada

    Gabrielle Brankston et al. “Quantifying contact patterns in response to COVID-19 public health measures in Canada”. In:BMC public health21.1 (2021), p. 2040.doi:10.1186/ s12889-021-12080-1

    2021

  10. [10]

    Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross- sectional online survey

    Jessica RE Bridgen, Chris Jewell, and Jonathan M Read. “Social mixing patterns in the UK following the relaxation of COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, July–August 2020: a cross- sectional online survey”. In:BMJ open12.12 (2022), e059231.doi:10 . 1136 / bmjopen - 2021-059231

    2020

  11. [11]

    Improving the use of social contact studies in epidemic mod- eling

    Tom Britton and Frank Ball. “Improving the use of social contact studies in epidemic mod- eling”. In:Epidemiology36.5 (2025), pp. 660–667.doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001876

    work page doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001876 2025

  12. [12]

    Identifiability analysis for stochastic differential equation models in systems biology

    Alexander P. Browning et al. “Identifiability analysis for stochastic differential equation models in systems biology”. In:Journal of The Royal Society Interface17.173 (Dec. 2020), p. 20200652.issn: 1742-5689.doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0652. eprint:https://royalsocietypublishing. org/rsif/article-pdf/doi/10.1098/rsif.2020.0652/216790/rsif.2020.0652.pdf. url:ht...

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2020.0652 2020

  13. [13]

    Understanding COVID-19 dynamics and the effects of interven- tions in the Philippines: A mathematical modelling study

    Jamie M Caldwell et al. “Understanding COVID-19 dynamics and the effects of interven- tions in the Philippines: A mathematical modelling study”. In:The Lancet Regional Health– Western Pacific14 (2021).doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100211

    work page doi:10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100211 2021

  14. [14]

    Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control

    Giulia Cencetti et al. “Digital proximity tracing on empirical contact networks for pandemic control”. In:Nature communications12.1 (2021), p. 1655.doi:10 . 1038 / s41467 - 021 - 21809-w

    2021

  15. [16]

    A hybrid approach combining Bayesian networks and logistic regression for enhancing risk assessment

    Pietro Coletti et al. “CoMix: comparing mixing patterns in the Belgian population during and after lockdown”. In:Scientific reports10.1 (2020), p. 21885.doi:10.1038/s41598- 020-78540-7

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598- 2020

  16. [17]

    Singapore: Springer, 2024.doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2539-7

    Nik Cunniffe et al.Identifiability and Observability in Epidemiological Models - A Primer. Singapore: Springer, 2024.doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2539-7

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2539-7 2024

  17. [18]

    Four key challenges in infectious disease modelling using data from multiple sources

    Daniela De Angelis et al. “Four key challenges in infectious disease modelling using data from multiple sources”. In:Epidemics10 (2015). Challenges in Modelling Infectious DIsease Dy- namics, pp. 83–87.issn: 1755-4365.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epidem.2014.09. 004.url:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175543651400053X

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2014.09 2015

  18. [19]

    New Routes to Phylogeography: A Bayesian Structured Coalescent Approximation

    Nicola De Maio et al. “New Routes to Phylogeography: A Bayesian Structured Coalescent Approximation”. In:PLoS Genetics11.8 (Aug. 2015), pp. 1–22.doi:10.1371/journal. pgen.1005421.url:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1005421

    work page doi:10.1371/journal 2015

  19. [20]

    Data-driven dynamical analysis of an age-structured model: A graph-theoretic approach

    Preeti Deolia and Anuraj Singh. “Data-driven dynamical analysis of an age-structured model: A graph-theoretic approach”. In:Mathematical Methods in the Applied Sciences48.2 (2025), pp. 2446–2473.doi:10.1002/mma.10445

    work page doi:10.1002/mma.10445 2025

  20. [21]

    Mobility-driven synthetic contact matrices as a scalable solution for real-time pandemic response modeling

    Laura Di Domenico et al. “Mobility-driven synthetic contact matrices as a scalable solution for real-time pandemic response modeling”. In:Nature Communications17.1 (Jan. 2026), p. 1845.issn: 2041-1723.doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68557-3.url:https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41467-026-68557-3. 23

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-68557-3.url:https://doi.org/10 2026

  21. [22]

    The construction of next-generation matrices for compartmental epidemic models

    Odo Diekmann, Johan Andre Peter Heesterbeek, and Michael G Roberts. “The construction of next-generation matrices for compartmental epidemic models”. In:Journal of the royal society interface7.47 (2010), pp. 873–885.doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0386

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2009.0386 2010

  22. [23]

    Transmission matrices used in epidemiologic modelling

    M Bekker-Nielsen Dunbar. “Transmission matrices used in epidemiologic modelling”. In: Infectious Disease Modelling9.1 (2024), pp. 185–194.doi:10.1016/j.idm.2023.11.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.idm.2023.11.009 2024

  23. [24]

    Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Dennis M Feehan and Ayesha S Mahmud. “Quantifying population contact patterns in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic”. In:Nature communications12.1 (2021), p. 893.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20990-2 2021

  24. [25]

    Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach

    Joseph Felsenstein. “Evolutionary Trees from DNA Sequences: A Maximum Likelihood Approach”. In:Journal of Molecular Evolution17 (1981), pp. 368–376.doi:10 . 1007 / BF01734359

    1981

  25. [26]

    R package version 0.5.1

    Sebastian Funk et al.socialmixr: Social Mixing Matrices for Infectious Disease Modelling. R package version 0.5.1. 2026.url:https://github.com/epiforecasts/socialmixr

    2026

  26. [27]

    Changes in social contacts in England during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and March 2021 as measured by the CoMix survey: A repeated cross- sectional study

    Amy Gimma et al. “Changes in social contacts in England during the COVID-19 pandemic between March 2020 and March 2021 as measured by the CoMix survey: A repeated cross- sectional study”. In:PLoS medicine19.3 (2022), e1003907.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed. 1003907

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pmed 2020

  27. [28]

    Zenodo, Sept

    Amy Gimma et al.CoMix social contact data (UK). Zenodo, Sept. 2024.doi:10.5281/ zenodo.13684044.url:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13684044

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.13684044 2024

  28. [29]

    Post-pandemic social contact patterns in the United Kingdom: the Reconnect survey

    Lucy Goodfellow et al. “Post-pandemic social contact patterns in the United Kingdom: the Reconnect survey”. In:medRxiv(2025), pp. 2025–08.doi:10.1101/2025.08.13.25333584

    work page doi:10.1101/2025.08.13.25333584 2025

  29. [30]

    Google.COVID-19 Community Mobility Reports.https : / / www . google . com / covid19 / mobility/. Accessed: 2026-01-06

    2026

  30. [31]

    Examining the influence of imbalanced social contact matrices in epidemic models

    Mackenzie A Hamilton, Jesse Knight, and Sharmistha Mishra. “Examining the influence of imbalanced social contact matrices in epidemic models”. In:American journal of epidemi- ology193.2 (2024), pp. 339–347.doi:10.1093/aje/kwad185

    work page doi:10.1093/aje/kwad185 2024

  31. [32]

    Failure to balance social contact matrices can bias models of infectious disease transmission

    Mackenzie A Hamilton, Jesse Knight, and Sharmistha Mishra. “Failure to balance social contact matrices can bias models of infectious disease transmission”. In:medRxiv(2022), pp. 2022–07.doi:10.1101/2022.07.28.22278155

    work page doi:10.1101/2022.07.28.22278155 2022

  32. [33]

    A beta-Poisson model for infectious disease transmission

    Joe Hilton and Ian Hall. “A beta-Poisson model for infectious disease transmission”. In: PLoS computational biology20.2 (2024), e1011856.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011856

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011856 2024

  33. [34]

    A systematic review of social contact surveys to inform transmission models of close-contact infections

    Thang Hoang et al. “A systematic review of social contact surveys to inform transmission models of close-contact infections”. In:Epidemiology30.5 (2019), pp. 723–736.doi:10 . 1097/EDE.0000000000001047

    2019

  34. [35]

    Exploring human mixing patterns based on time use and social contact data and their implications for infectious disease transmission models

    Thang Van Hoang et al. “Exploring human mixing patterns based on time use and social contact data and their implications for infectious disease transmission models”. In:BMC Infectious Diseases22.1 (2022), p. 954.doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07917-y

    work page doi:10.1186/s12879-022-07917-y 2022

  35. [36]

    Human mobility data in the COVID-19 pandemic: characteristics, applica- tions, and challenges

    Tao Hu et al. “Human mobility data in the COVID-19 pandemic: characteristics, applica- tions, and challenges”. In:International Journal of Digital Earth14.9 (2021), pp. 1126–1147. doi:10.1080/17538947.2021.1952324. 24

    work page doi:10.1080/17538947.2021.1952324 2021

  36. [37]

    Bluetongue virus spread in Europe is a consequence of climatic, land- scape and vertebrate host factors as revealed by phylogeographic inference

    Maude Jacquot et al. “Bluetongue virus spread in Europe is a consequence of climatic, land- scape and vertebrate host factors as revealed by phylogeographic inference”. In:Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences284.1864 (Oct. 2017), p. 20170919.issn: 0962- 8452.doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0919. eprint:https://royalsocietypublishing.org/ rspb/art...

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.0919 2017

  37. [38]

    Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK

    Christopher I Jarvis et al. “Quantifying the impact of physical distance measures on the transmission of COVID-19 in the UK”. In:BMC medicine18.1 (2020), p. 124.doi:10. 1186/s12916-020-01597-8

    2020

  38. [39]

    Chris P Jewell et al.Bayesian inference for high-dimensional discrete-time epidemic models: spatial dynamics of the UK COVID-19 outbreak. 2023. arXiv:2306.07987 [physics.soc-ph]. url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.07987

    work page arXiv 2023

  39. [40]

    Comparison of the 2021 COVID-19 roadmap projections against public health data in England

    Matt J Keeling et al. “Comparison of the 2021 COVID-19 roadmap projections against public health data in England”. In:Nature communications13.1 (2022), p. 4924.doi:10. 1038/s41467-022-31991-0

    2021

  40. [41]

    Exact phylodynamic likelihood via structured Markov genealogy processes

    Aaron A. King, Qianying Lin, and Edward L. Ionides.Exact phylodynamic likelihood via structured Markov genealogy processes. 2025. arXiv:2405.17032 [q-bio.QM].url:https: //arxiv.org/abs/2405.17032

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [42]

    On Parameter Identifiability in Network-Based Epidemic Models

    Istvan Z Kiss and Peter L Simon. “On Parameter Identifiability in Network-Based Epidemic Models”. In:Bulletin of Mathematical Biology85.18 (2023).doi:10.1007/s11538- 023- 01121-y

    work page doi:10.1007/s11538- 2023

  42. [43]

    Changing social contact patterns among US workers during the COVID- 19 pandemic: April 2020 to December 2021

    Moses C Kiti et al. “Changing social contact patterns among US workers during the COVID- 19 pandemic: April 2020 to December 2021”. In:Epidemics45 (2023), p. 100727.doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100727

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100727 2020

  43. [44]

    Contagion! the bbc four pandemic–the model behind the documentary

    Petra Klepac, Stephen Kissler, and Julia Gog. “Contagion! the bbc four pandemic–the model behind the documentary”. In:Epidemics24 (2018), pp. 49–59.doi:10.1016/j.epidem. 2018.03.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epidem 2018

  44. [45]

    Contacts in context: large-scale setting-specific social mixing matrices from the BBC Pandemic project

    Petra Klepac et al. “Contacts in context: large-scale setting-specific social mixing matrices from the BBC Pandemic project”. In:MedRxiv(2020), pp. 2020–02.doi:10.1101/2020. 02.16.20023754

    work page doi:10.1101/2020 2020

  45. [46]

    Eigenvector-based sensitivity analysis of contact pat- terns in epidemic modelling

    Evans Kiptoo Korir and Zsolt Vizi. “Eigenvector-based sensitivity analysis of contact pat- terns in epidemic modelling”. In:Journal of The Royal Society Interface22.233 (Dec. 2025), p. 20250664.issn: 1742-5689.doi:10 . 1098 / rsif . 2025 . 0664. eprint:https : //royalsocietypublishing.org/rsif/article- pdf/doi/10.1098/rsif.2025.0664/ 4416802/rsif.2025.066...

    work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2025.0664/ 2025

  46. [47]

    The contribution of social behaviour to the transmission of in- fluenza A in a human population

    Adam J Kucharski et al. “The contribution of social behaviour to the transmission of in- fluenza A in a human population”. In:PLoS pathogens10.6 (2014), e1004206.doi:10.1371/ journal.ppat.1004206. 25

    2014

  47. [48]

    Phylodynamics with Migration: A Computational Framework to Quantify Population Structure from Genomic Data

    Denise K¨ uhnert et al. “Phylodynamics with Migration: A Computational Framework to Quantify Population Structure from Genomic Data”. In:Molecular Biology and Evolution 33.8 (Apr. 2016), pp. 2102–2116.issn: 0737-4038.doi:10.1093/molbev/msw064. eprint: https://academic.oup.com/mbe/article-pdf/33/8/2102/7946826/msw064.pdf.url: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw064

    work page doi:10.1093/molbev/msw064 2016

  48. [49]

    Evolving social contact patterns during the COVID-19 crisis in Luxembourg

    Ardashel Latsuzbaia et al. “Evolving social contact patterns during the COVID-19 crisis in Luxembourg”. In:PLoS ONE15.8 (2020), e0237128.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237128

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0237128 2020

  49. [50]

    Augmenting con- tact matrices with time-use data for fine-grained intervention modelling of disease dynamics: A modelling analysis

    Edwin van Leeuwen, PHE Joint Modelling Group, and Frank Sandmann. “Augmenting con- tact matrices with time-use data for fine-grained intervention modelling of disease dynamics: A modelling analysis”. In:Statistical Methods in Medical Research31.9 (2022), pp. 1704– 1715.doi:10.1177/09622802211037078

    work page doi:10.1177/09622802211037078 2022

  50. [51]

    Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots

    Philippe Lemey et al. “Bayesian phylogeography finds its roots”. In:PLoS computational biology5.9 (2009), e1000520.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000520 2009

  51. [52]

    Social contact patterns relevant for infectious disease transmission in Cambodia

    William TM Leung et al. “Social contact patterns relevant for infectious disease transmission in Cambodia”. In:Scientific Reports13.1 (2023), p. 5542.doi:10 . 1038 / s41598 - 023 - 31485-z

    2023

  52. [53]

    Rapid review of social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic

    Carol Y Liu et al. “Rapid review of social contact patterns during the COVID-19 pandemic”. In:Epidemiology32.6 (2021), pp. 781–791.doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001412

    work page doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000001412 2021

  53. [54]

    Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence

    James O Lloyd-Smith et al. “Superspreading and the effect of individual variation on disease emergence”. In:Nature438.7066 (2005), pp. 355–359.doi:10.1038/nature04153

    work page doi:10.1038/nature04153 2005

  54. [55]

    Spatial and Temporal Phylogeny of Border Disease Virus in Pyre- nean Chamois (Rupicapra p. pyrenaica)

    Camilla Luzzago et al. “Spatial and Temporal Phylogeny of Border Disease Virus in Pyre- nean Chamois (Rupicapra p. pyrenaica)”. In:PLoS ONE11.12 (Dec. 2016), pp. 1–17.doi: 10 . 1371 / journal . pone . 0168232.url:https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1371 / journal . pone . 0168232

    2016

  55. [56]

    An infectious disease model on empirical networks of human contact: bridging the gap between dynamic network data and contact matrices

    Anna Machens et al. “An infectious disease model on empirical networks of human contact: bridging the gap between dynamic network data and contact matrices”. In:BMC infectious diseases13.1 (2013), p. 185.doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-185

    work page doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-185 2013

  56. [57]

    Generalized contact matrices allow integrating socioeconomic vari- ables into epidemic models

    Adriana Manna et al. “Generalized contact matrices allow integrating socioeconomic vari- ables into epidemic models”. In:Science Advances10.41 (2024), eadk4606.doi:10.1126/ sciadv.adk4606

    2024

  57. [58]

    Adriana Manna et al.Generalized contact matrices for epidemic modeling. 2023. arXiv: 2306.17250 [physics.soc-ph].url:https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.17250

    work page arXiv 2023

  58. [59]

    Incorporating social contact data in spatio-temporal models for infectious disease spread

    Sebastian Meyer and Leonhard Held. “Incorporating social contact data in spatio-temporal models for infectious disease spread”. In:Biostatistics18.2 (2017), pp. 338–351.doi:10. 1093/biostatistics/kxw051

    2017

  59. [60]

    Parameter sensitivity analysis for biochemical reaction networks

    Giorgos Minas and David A Rand. “Parameter sensitivity analysis for biochemical reaction networks”. In:Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering16.5 (2019), pp. 3965–3987.issn: 1551-0018.doi:10.3934/mbe.2019196.url:https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/ 10.3934/mbe.2019196

    work page doi:10.3934/mbe.2019196.url:https://www.aimspress.com/article/doi/ 2019

  60. [61]

    Inferring high-resolution human mixing patterns for disease modeling

    Dina Mistry et al. “Inferring high-resolution human mixing patterns for disease modeling”. In:Nature communications12.1 (2021), p. 323.doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20544-y. 26

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-20544-y 2021

  61. [62]

    Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases

    Jo¨ el Mossong et al. “Social contacts and mixing patterns relevant to the spread of infectious diseases”. In:PLoS Medicine5.3 (2008), e74.doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050074 2008

  62. [63]

    Social contact patterns and implications for infectious disease transmission– a systematic review and meta-analysis of contact surveys

    Andria Mousa et al. “Social contact patterns and implications for infectious disease transmission– a systematic review and meta-analysis of contact surveys”. In:Elife10 (2021), e70294.doi: 10.7554/eLife.70294

    work page doi:10.7554/elife.70294 2021

  63. [64]

    Evaluating the use of social contact data to produce age-specific short-term forecasts of SARS-CoV-2 incidence in England

    James D Munday et al. “Evaluating the use of social contact data to produce age-specific short-term forecasts of SARS-CoV-2 incidence in England”. In:PLoS Computational Biology 19.9 (2023), e1011453.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011453

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011453 2023

  64. [65]

    A mixed methods analysis of participation in a social contact survey

    Emily Nixon et al. “A mixed methods analysis of participation in a social contact survey”. In:Epidemics41 (2022), p. 100635.doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635

    work page doi:10.1016/j.epidem.2022.100635 2022

  65. [66]

    Reduction in mobility and COVID-19 transmission

    Pierre Nouvellet et al. “Reduction in mobility and COVID-19 transmission”. In:Nature communications12.1 (2021), p. 1090.doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21358-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21358-2 2021

  66. [67]

    Office for National Statistics.Coronavirus (COVID-19) Infection Survey, UK: 13 May 2022. Tech. rep. Accessed: 2026-03-05. Office for National Statistics, May 2022.url:https://www. ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/ bulletins/coronaviruscovid19infectionsurveypilot/13may2022

    2022

  67. [68]

    2020.doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764

    Nuria Oliver et al.Mobile phone data for informing public health actions across the COVID- 19 pandemic life cycle. 2020.doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.abc0764 2020

  68. [69]

    Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the com- parative analysis of discrete characters

    Mark Pagel. “Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the com- parative analysis of discrete characters”. In:Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences225 (1342 1994), pp. 37–45.doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0006

    work page doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 1994

  69. [70]

    Abhishek Pandey et al.The effect of extended closure of red-light areas on COVID-19 trans- mission in India. 2020. arXiv:2006.10488 [physics.soc-ph].url:https://arxiv.org/ abs/2006.10488

    work page arXiv 2020

  70. [71]

    Epidemiological drivers of transmissibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 in England

    Pablo N Perez-Guzman et al. “Epidemiological drivers of transmissibility and severity of SARS-CoV-2 in England”. In:Nature Communications14.1 (2023), p. 4279.doi:10.1038/ s41467-023-39661-5

    2023

  71. [72]

    Establishment and lineage dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the UK

    Louis du Plessis et al. “Establishment and lineage dynamics of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic in the UK”. In:Science371.6530 (2021), pp. 708–712.doi:10.1126/science.abf2946

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abf2946 2021

  72. [73]

    Estimation of age- stratified contact rates during the COVID-19 pandemic using a novel inference algorithm

    Christopher M Pooley, Andrea B Doeschl-Wilson, and Glenn Marion. “Estimation of age- stratified contact rates during the COVID-19 pandemic using a novel inference algorithm”. In:Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A380.2233 (2022), p. 20210298.doi: 10.1098/rsta.2021.0298

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2021.0298 2022

  73. [74]

    Projecting social contact matrices in 152 coun- tries using contact surveys and demographic data

    Kiesha Prem, Alex R Cook, and Mark Jit. “Projecting social contact matrices in 152 coun- tries using contact surveys and demographic data”. In:PLoS computational biology13.9 (2017), e1005697.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005697

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005697 2017

  74. [75]

    Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: an update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era

    Kiesha Prem et al. “Projecting contact matrices in 177 geographical regions: an update and comparison with empirical data for the COVID-19 era”. In:PLoS computational biology17.7 (2021), e1009098.doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009098 2021

  75. [76]

    Estimating social contact rates for the COVID-19 pandemic using Google mobility and pre-pandemic contact surveys

    Em Prestige et al. “Estimating social contact rates for the COVID-19 pandemic using Google mobility and pre-pandemic contact surveys”. In:Epidemics(2025), p. 100830.doi:10.1016/ j.epidem.2025.100830. 27

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [77]

    Social mixing patterns in rural and urban areas of southern China

    Jonathan M Read et al. “Social mixing patterns in rural and urban areas of southern China”. In:Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences281.1785 (2014).doi:10.1098/ rspb.2014.0268

    work page arXiv 2014

  77. [78]

    Large-scale spatial-transmission models of infectious disease

    Steven Riley. “Large-scale spatial-transmission models of infectious disease”. In:Science 316.5829 (2007), pp. 1298–1301.doi:10.1126/science.1134695

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1134695 2007

  78. [79]

    Age-specific contribution of contacts to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany

    Isti Rodiah et al. “Age-specific contribution of contacts to transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany”. In:European Journal of Epidemiology38.1 (2023), pp. 39–58.doi:10.1007/ s10654-022-00938-6

    2023

  79. [80]

    Transmission matrix parameter estimation of COVID-19 evolution with age compartments using ensemble-based data assimilation

    Santiago Rosa et al. “Transmission matrix parameter estimation of COVID-19 evolution with age compartments using ensemble-based data assimilation”. In:PLoS ONE20.4 (2025), e0318426.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318426.url:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ articles/PMC12036932/

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0318426.url:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ 2025

  80. [81]

    On the Estimation of Contact Matrices for Age- Structured Models at the Onset of Epidemic Spread

    Santiago Sarratea and Gabriel Fabricius. “On the Estimation of Contact Matrices for Age- Structured Models at the Onset of Epidemic Spread”. In:Bulletin of Mathematical Biology 88.1 (2026), p. 3.doi:10.1007/s11538-025-01571-6

    work page doi:10.1007/s11538-025-01571-6 2026

Showing first 80 references.