Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by

Electronic correlations driving Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Electron correlations stabilize non-collinear helical order that produces strong spin selectivity from vanishingly small spin-orbit coupling.

desk verdict Interactions stabilize helical order that produces CISS with tiny SOC in this model, backed by DMRG/CPT/MC on clusters. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.30240 v1 pith:T7OA7ODO submitted 2026-05-28 cond-mat.str-el

Jacek Herbrych , Maria Daghofer This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords chirality-inducedspinselectivityelectroniccorrelationshelicalorganicmoleculesp-wavemagnetismnon-collinearmagneticorderspin-orbitcouplingdensity-matrixrenormalizationgroup
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper models low-dimensional helical organic molecules while including electron-electron interactions. Competition among different hopping channels, together with double- and superexchange terms generated by those interactions, stabilizes non-collinear helical magnetic order. The resulting bands exhibit partial spin polarization, which the authors identify as p-wave magnetism. Even tiny spin-orbit coupling then produces pronounced spin selectivity at temperatures well above the spin-orbit energy scale. Strong correlations are required, yet long-range magnetic order is not.

What carries the argument

Competition between hopping channels together with double- and superexchange mechanisms that stabilize non-collinear helical magnetic order and generate p-wave magnetism in the single-electron bands.

What would settle it

Observation that spin selectivity in helical molecules disappears when electron correlations are suppressed or requires spin-orbit coupling strength comparable to the temperature scale would falsify the mechanism.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Competition between various hopping channels, together with interaction-induced double- and superexchange mechanisms, can stabilize non-collinear helical magnetic order. The resulting single-electron bands exhibit partial spin polarization, a manifestation of p-wave magnetism. Even vanishingly small spin-orbit coupling triggers strong spin selectivity at temperatures significantly above the spin-orbit scale. While strong correlations are essential for this mechanism, long-range spin ordering is not required.

Load-bearing premise

The specific values and competition among hopping channels in the helical geometry, together with the interaction strengths that produce the double- and superexchange terms, are representative of real low-dimensional organic molecules.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Single-electron bands acquire partial spin polarization without long-range order.
  • Vanishingly small spin-orbit coupling suffices to produce strong spin selectivity.
  • The selectivity persists at temperatures significantly above the spin-orbit energy scale.
  • The effect is driven by correlations rather than by conventional spin-orbit physics.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests that molecular design aimed at enhancing correlation effects could increase spin selectivity in chiral organic systems.
  • Similar correlation-driven partial polarization may appear in other low-dimensional structures that support helical geometries.
  • Temperature-dependent measurements of spin selectivity in candidate organic molecules could distinguish this correlation route from direct spin-orbit mechanisms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript models electron-electron interactions in low-dimensional helical organic molecules and shows that competition among hopping channels combined with interaction-driven double- and superexchange can stabilize non-collinear helical spin correlations. These correlations produce partially spin-polarized single-particle bands (p-wave magnetism). Even arbitrarily small spin-orbit coupling then induces strong spin selectivity at temperatures well above the SOC energy scale. Long-range magnetic order is not required. The results are obtained with DMRG, cluster perturbation theory, and Monte Carlo simulations on finite clusters.

Significance. If the central mechanism holds, the work supplies a correlation-driven route to CISS that explains the experimental observation of large selectivity despite weak SOC. The explicit use of three complementary numerical methods on a microscopic interacting model, together with the demonstration that short-range helical correlations suffice, constitutes a concrete, testable advance over purely phenomenological or single-particle pictures.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.2, Table I] §3.2 and Table I: the specific ratios among the three competing hopping amplitudes are chosen to place the system inside the helical regime; the manuscript does not demonstrate that these ratios are robust under modest variations or are independently constrained by ab-initio estimates for any concrete molecule, leaving open whether the reported stabilization is generic or parameter-tuned.
  2. [Fig. 7] Fig. 7 and the accompanying Monte Carlo analysis: the temperature window in which spin selectivity remains large is shown for one set of interaction strengths; it is not quantified how this window scales with the ratio of exchange to SOC or with system size, which is needed to substantiate the claim that selectivity persists “significantly above the spin-orbit scale.”
minor comments (2)
  1. The term “p-wave magnetism” is introduced without a reference to its prior usage in the literature on non-collinear magnets; a brief citation would clarify the intended meaning.
  2. [Methods] The finite-cluster sizes employed for the DMRG and CPT calculations are stated only in the methods paragraph; repeating the largest linear dimensions in the figure captions would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment and recommendation of minor revision. We address each major comment below and will incorporate the suggested clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Table I] §3.2 and Table I: the specific ratios among the three competing hopping amplitudes are chosen to place the system inside the helical regime; the manuscript does not demonstrate that these ratios are robust under modest variations or are independently constrained by ab-initio estimates for any concrete molecule, leaving open whether the reported stabilization is generic or parameter-tuned.

    Authors: The ratios in Table I are chosen to realize the helical regime identified in the phase diagram of Fig. 2, which is the regime where the proposed correlation-driven mechanism operates. Additional DMRG calculations varying the ratios by ±20% confirm that non-collinear correlations and the resulting spin selectivity persist. These checks will be added to the revised manuscript. A full ab-initio determination of parameters for a specific molecule lies outside the scope of this model study. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Fig. 7] Fig. 7 and the accompanying Monte Carlo analysis: the temperature window in which spin selectivity remains large is shown for one set of interaction strengths; it is not quantified how this window scales with the ratio of exchange to SOC or with system size, which is needed to substantiate the claim that selectivity persists “significantly above the spin-orbit scale.”

    Authors: The temperature scale in Fig. 7 is governed by the exchange energy J, which is independent of SOC and allows selectivity well above the SOC scale. In the revision we will add Monte Carlo results for two additional J/SOC ratios to quantify the scaling of the temperature window. A comprehensive finite-size scaling study across all parameters is computationally intensive for the cluster sizes employed, but the agreement among DMRG, CPT and MC on finite clusters already supports the robustness of the effect. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Independent ab-initio constraints on the hopping ratios for any concrete molecule

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; results emerge from numerical simulation of an explicit microscopic model

full rationale

The paper constructs a microscopic Hamiltonian for helical molecules that includes multiple hopping channels plus on-site and inter-site Coulomb interactions. It then applies DMRG, cluster perturbation theory, and Monte Carlo to finite clusters and reports that the resulting ground states and finite-temperature correlations exhibit non-collinear helical spin order, partial spin polarization of single-particle bands, and strong spin selectivity once an arbitrarily small SOC term is added. None of these outcomes is presupposed by definition, obtained by fitting parameters to the target observables, or justified solely by self-citation. The chosen hoppings and interaction strengths are stated model inputs whose consequences are computed rather than tautologically recovered; the numerical methods are standard and externally verifiable. Consequently the central claims do not reduce to their inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on an interacting-electron lattice model whose geometry and interaction terms are chosen to represent helical organic molecules; specific numerical values for hoppings and interactions are not given in the abstract and must be treated as free parameters.

free parameters (2)
  • hopping amplitudes for competing channels
    Parameters that encode the helical geometry and channel competition; their specific values are required to stabilize the non-collinear order.
  • electron-electron interaction strength
    Strength of Coulomb repulsion that generates double- and superexchange terms; must be in an appropriate regime for the mechanism.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption The helical organic molecules can be represented by a low-dimensional lattice model with multiple hopping channels and local Coulomb interactions.
    This modeling choice is invoked to apply the numerical methods and obtain the non-collinear order.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electronic correlations driving Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/T7OA7ODO

@misc{pith2026260530240,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electronic correlations driving Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/T7OA7ODO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.30240}
}
abstract

We explicitly account for electron-electron interactions when modeling low-dimensional helical organic molecules. We show that competition between various hopping channels, together with interaction-induced double- and superexchange mechanisms, can stabilize non-collinear helical magnetic order. The resulting single-electron bands exhibit partial spin polarization, a manifestation of $p$-wave magnetism. Using density-matrix renormalization group, cluster perturbation theory, and Monte Carlo methods, we find that even vanishingly small spin-orbit coupling triggers strong spin selectivity at temperatures significantly above the spin-orbit scale. While strong correlations are essential for this mechanism, long-range spin ordering is not required. We thus propose non-collinear spin correlations driven by Coulomb interactions as an explanation of chirality-induced spin selectivity and discuss connections to experiments.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.30240 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Cartoon of the two-orbital model motivated by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Cluster perturbation theory results based on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Markov-chain Monte-Carlo results for the classi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Tunneling amplifies chirality-induced spin selectivity and explains its current-direction invariance

    cond-mat.mes-hall 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    A tunneling-plus-dissipation model amplifies weak current-induced Zeeman splitting in chiral molecules to explain near-100% CISS polarization and current-direction invariance while obeying Onsager reciprocity.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    0 (a) 0 0 . 04 0 . 08 N ↑(k, µ ) N ↓(k, µ ) (c) FIG. 2. Density matrix renormalization group method re- sults for the KLM (1) withl= 1 Rashba SOC (2). (a) Fre- quency dependent density-of-statesN σ(ω) without and with Rashba SOC (2). For the latter, both spin projections are presented. (b) Momentumkresolved one-particle spectral densityN(k, ω) for both sp...

    2023

  2. [2]

    G¨ ohler, V

    B. G¨ ohler, V. Hamelbeck, T. Markus, M. Kettner, G. F. Hanne, Z. Vager, R. Naaman, and H. Zacharias, Spin Selectivity in Electron Transmission Through Self- Assembled Monolayers of Double-Stranded DNA, Science 331, 894 (2011)

    2011

  3. [3]

    R. A. Rosenberg, D. Mishra, and R. Naaman, Chiral Se- lective Chemistry Induced by Natural Selection of Spin- Polarized Electrons, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.54, 7295 (2015)

    2015

  4. [4]

    Naaman, Y

    R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, and D. H. Waldeck, Nat. Rev. Chem.3, 250 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Siebert, O

    R. Siebert, O. Ammerpohl, M. Rossini, D. Herb, S. Rau, M. B. Plenio, F. Jelezko, and J. Ankerhold, A quantum physics layer of epigenetics: a hypothesis deduced from charge transfer and chirality-induced spin selectivity of DNA, Clin. Epigenetics.15, 145 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    N. R. and D. H. Waldeck, Spintronics and Chirality: Spin Selectivity in Electron Transport Through Chiral Molecules, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.66, 263 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    B. P. Bloom, Y. Paltiel, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck, Chiral Induced Spin Selectivity, Chem. Rev.124, 1950 (2024)

    1950

  8. [8]

    Mishra, T

    D. Mishra, T. Z. Markus, R. Naaman, M. Kettner, B. G¨ ohler, H. Zacharias, N. Friedman, M. Sheves, and C. Fontanesi, Spin-dependent electron transmission through bacteriorhodopsin embedded in purple mem- brane, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA110, 14872 (2013)

    2013

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Kulkarni, A

    C. Kulkarni, A. K. Mondal, T. K. Das, G. Grin- bom, F. Tassinari, M. F. J. Mabesoone, E. W. Mei- jer, and R. Naaman, Highly Efficient and Tunable Fil- tering of Electrons’ Spin by Supramolecular Chirality of Nanofiber-Based Materials, Adv. Mater.32, 1904965 (2020)

    2020

  2. [10]

    A. Inui, R. Aoki, Y. Nishiue, K. Shiota, Y. Kousaka, H. Shishido, D. Hirobe, M. Suda, J. Ohe, J. Kishine, H. M. Yamamoto, and Y. Togawa, Chirality-Induced Spin-Polarized State of a Chiral Crystal CrNb 3S6, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 166602 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Z. Xie, T. Markus, S. R. Cohen, Z. Vager, R. Gutier- rez, and R. Naaman, Spin Specific Electron Conduction through DNA Oligomers, Nano Lett.11, 4652 (2011)

    2011

  4. [12]

    Banerjee-Ghosh, O

    K. Banerjee-Ghosh, O. B. Dor, F. Tassinari, E. Ca- pua, S. Yochelis, A. Capua, S.-H. Yang, S. S. P. Parkin, S. Sarkar, L. Kronik, L. T. Baczewski, R. Naaman, and Y. Paltiel, Separation of enantiomers by their enantiospe- cific interaction with achiral magnetic substrates, Scie...

    2018

  5. [13]

    M. R. Safari, F. Matthes, V. Caciuc, N. Atodiresei, C. M. Schneider, K.-H. Ernst, and D. E. B¨ urgler, Enantioselec- tive Adsorption on Magnetic Surfaces, Adv. Mater.36, 2308666 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Ghosh, S

    S. Ghosh, S. Mishra, E. Avigad, B. P. Bloom, L. T. Baczewski, S. Yochelis, Y. Paltiel, R. Naaman, and D. H. Waldeck, Effect of Chiral Molecules on the Electron’s Spin Wavefunction at Interfaces, J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 11, 1550 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    M. R. Safari, F. Matthes, C. M. Schneider, K.-H. Ernst, and D. E. B¨ urgler, Spin-selective electron trans- port through single chiral molecules, Small20, 2308233 (2024)

    2024

  8. [16]

    Y. Zhou, D. L. M. Cordova, G. M. Milligan, M. Q. Ar- guilla, and R. Wu, Higher-dimensional spin selectivity in chiral crystals, Phys. Rev. B110, 045434 (2024)

    2024

  9. [17]

    Y. Liu, R. Shrestha, K. Denisov, D. Ayala, M. van Schilf- gaarde, W. Nie, and I. ˇZuti´ c, Unconventional Spintronics from Chiral Perovskites, Adv. Funct. Mater.35, e09127 (2025)

    2025

  10. [18]

    Utsumi, O

    Y. Utsumi, O. Entin-Wohlman, and A. Aharony, Spin selectivity through time-reversal symmetric helical junc- tions, Phys. Rev. B102, 035445 (2020)

    2020

  11. [19]

    Evers, A

    F. Evers, A. Aharony, N. Bar-Gill, O. Entin-Wohlman, P. Hedeg˚ ard, O. Hod, P. Jelinek, G. Kamieniarz, M. Lemeshko, K. Michaeli, V. Mujica, R. Naaman, Y. Paltiel, S. Refaely-Abramson, O. Tal, J. Thijssen, M. Thoss, J. M. van Ruitenbeek, L. Venkataraman, D. H. Waldeck, B. Yan, ...

    2022

  12. [20]

    Zhang, Y

    T.-Y. Zhang, Y. Mao, A.-M. Guo, and Q.-F. Sun, Dy- namical theory of chiral-induced spin selectivity in elec- tron donor–chiral molecule–acceptor systems, Phys. Rev. B111, 205417 (2025)

    2025

  13. [21]

    A. G. Volosniev, H. Alpern, Y. Paltiel, O. Millo, M. Lemeshko, and A. Ghazaryan, Interplay between fric- tion and spin-orbit coupling as a source of spin polariza- tion, Phys. Rev. B104, 024430 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    Y. Liu, J. Xiao, J. Koo, and B. Yan, Chirality-driven topological electronic structure of DNA-like materials, Nat. Mater.20, 638 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    G¨ obel, L

    B. G¨ obel, L. Schimpf, and I. Mertig, Chirality-induced orbital Edelstein effect in an analytically solvable model, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 033180 (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Q. Yang, Y. Li, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Chirality-induced spin selectivity and current-driven spin and orbital po- larization in chiral crystals, Newton1, 100015 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Ashish, Y

    A. Ashish, Y. Kapon, F. Kammerbauer, D. Anthofer, S. Yochelis, H. Shema, E. Gross, M. Kl¨ aui, Y. Paltiel, and A. Wittmann, Chiral-induced unidirectional spin-to- charge conversion, Sci. Adv.11, eado4285 (2025)

    2025

  18. [26]

    H. J. Eckvahl, N. A. Tcyrulnikov, A. Chiesa, J. M. Bradley, R. M. Young, S. Carretta, M. D. Krzyaniak, and M. R. Wasielewski, Direct observation of chirality- induced spin selectivity in electron donor–acceptor 6 molecules, Science382, 197 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    Vittmann, J

    C. Vittmann, J. Lim, D. Tamascelli, S. F. Huelga, and M. B. Plenio, Spin-Dependent Momentum Conservation of Electron–Phonon Scattering in Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 340

  20. [28]

    S. Miwa, T. Yamamoto, T. Nagata, S. Sakamoto, K. Kimur, M. Shiga, W. Gao, H. M. Yamamotom, K. In- oue, T. Takenobu, T. Nozaki, and T. Ohto, Spin polariza- tion driven by molecular vibrations leads to enantioselec- tivity in chiral molecules, Sci. Adv.11, eadv5220 (2025)

    2025

  21. [29]

    Fransson, Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and ”chiral-induced spin selectivity”, Phys

    J. Fransson, Vibrational origin of exchange splitting and ”chiral-induced spin selectivity”, Phys. Rev. B102, 235416 (2020)

    2020

  22. [30]

    T. K. Das, F. Tassinari, R. Naaman, and J. Fransson, Temperature-Dependent Chiral-Induced Spin Selectivity Effect: Experiments and Theory, J. Phys. Chem. C126, 3257 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Fransson, Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity: The Role of Electron Correlations, J

    J. Fransson, Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity: The Role of Electron Correlations, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.10, 7126 (2019)

    2019

  24. [32]

    Chiesa, E

    A. Chiesa, E. Garlatti, M. Mezzadri, L. Celada, R. Ses- soli, M. R. Wasielewski, R. Bittl, P. Santini, and S. Car- retta, Many-Body Models for Chirality-Induced Spin Se- lectivity in Electron Transfer, Nano Lett.24, 12133 (2024)

    2024

  25. [33]

    K. H. Huisman, J.-B. M.-Y. Heinisch, and J. M. Thi- jssen, Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity (CISS) Effect: Magnetocurrent–Voltage Characteristics with Coulomb Interactions I, J. Phys. Chem. C127, 6900 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    Kusunose, J

    H. Kusunose, J. Kishine, and H. M. Yamamoto, Emer- gence of chirality from electron spins, physical fields, and material-field composites, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 260501 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    P. M. Theiler, S. Driessen, and M. C. Beard, PT sym- metry enforced twin exchange as the origin of chirality- induced spin selectivity, Sci. Adv.12, eaec7069 (2026)

    2026

  28. [36]

    Chakraborty, A

    A. Chakraborty, A. Birk Hellenes, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, T. Jungwirth, L. ˇSmejkal, and J. Sinova, Highly Efficient Non-relativistic Edelstein effect inp-wave magnets, Nat. Commun.16, 7270 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    M. Hu, O. Janson, C. Felser, P. McClarty, J. van den Brink, and M. G. Vergniory, Spin Hall and Edelstein ef- fects in chiral non-collinear altermagnets, Nat. Commun. 16, 8529 (2025)

    2025

  30. [38]

    ˇZelezn´ y, Y

    J. ˇZelezn´ y, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and B. Yan, Spin- Polarized Current in Noncollinear Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 187204 (2017)

    2017

  31. [39]

    B. C. Park, S.-C. Kim, D. B. Lee, Y. K. Kim, B. Kim, S. H. Rhim, E. Lee, Y. Hong, K. Lee, S. H. Lee, J. Ma, M. Sawczyk, J. Lu, J. Manassa, N. Agarwal, R. Hov- den, S. O. Won, M. J. Ko, M. Park, J. Cho, X. Mao, K. Sun, Y. K. Kim, and N. A. Kotov, Chiral quantum magnets with opt...

    2025

  32. [40]

    A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, P-wave mag- nets (2026), arXiv:2309.01607

    2026 arXiv

  33. [41]

    J. C. Slater and G. F. Koster, Simplified LCAO Method for the Periodic Potential Problem, Phys. Rev.94, 1498 (1954)

    1954

  34. [42]

    Varela, V

    S. Varela, V. Mujica, and E. Medina, Effective spin-orbit couplings in an analytical tight-binding model of DNA: Spin filtering and chiral spin transport, Phys. Rev. B93, 155436 (2016)

    2016

  35. [43]

    Georges, L

    A. Georges, L. Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong Correla- tions from Hund’s Coupling, Annu. Rev. Condens. Mat- ter Phys.4, 137 (2013)

    2013

  36. [44]

    Herbrych, J

    J. Herbrych, J. Heverhagen, N. D. Patel, G. Alvarez, M. Daghofer, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Novel Magnetic Block States in Low-Dimensional Iron-Based Supercon- ductors, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 027203 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Herbrych, G

    J. Herbrych, G. Alvarez, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Block orbital-selective Mott insulators: A spin excitation analysis, Phys. Rev. B102, 115134 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    ´Sroda, E

    M. ´Sroda, E. Dagotto, and J. Herbrych, Quantum mag- netism of iron-based ladders: Blocks, spirals, and spin flux, Phys. Rev. B104, 045128 (2021)

    2021

  39. [47]

    ´Sroda, J

    M. ´Sroda, J. Mravlje, G. Alvarez, E. Dagotto, and J. Her- brych, Hund bands in spectra of multiorbital systems, Phys. Rev. B108, L081102 (2023)

    2023

  40. [48]

    Herbrych, J

    J. Herbrych, J. Heverhagen, G. Alvarez, M. Daghofer, A. Moreo, and E. Dagotto, Block–spiral magnetism: An exotic type of frustrated order, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA117, 16226 (2020)

    2020

  41. [49]

    X. Han, P. Ribeiro, and S. Chesi, Modulated spiral order in the 1D Kondo lattice model, Commun. Theor. Phys. 77, 115702 (2025)

    2025

  42. [50]

    Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys

    E. Jeckelmann, Dynamical density-matrix renormalization-group method, Phys. Rev. B66, 045114 (2002)

    2002

  43. [51]

    Nocera and G

    A. Nocera and G. Alvarez, Spectral functions with the density matrix renormalization group: Krylov-space ap- proach for correction vectors, Phys. Rev. E94, 053308 (2016)

    2016

  44. [52]

    S´ en´ echal, D

    D. S´ en´ echal, D. Perez, and D. Plouffe, Cluster perturba- tion theory for Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B66, 075129 (2002)

    2002

  45. [53]

    Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach: Analytical results and the Mott-Hubbard transition, Eur

    M. Potthoff, Self-energy-functional approach: Analytical results and the Mott-Hubbard transition, Eur. Phys. J. B36, 335 (2003)

    2003

  46. [54]

    Zinke, S.-L

    R. Zinke, S.-L. Drechsler, and J. Richter, Influence of interchain coupling on spiral ground-state correlations in frustrated spin- 1 2 J1−J2 Heisenberg chains, Phys. Rev. B 79, 094425 (2009)

    2009

  47. [55]

    Arita, K

    R. Arita, K. Kusakabe, K. Kuroki, and H. Aoki, Spectral function of the spiral spin state in the trestle and ladder Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B58, R11833 (1998)

    1998

  48. [56]

    S. Dong, R. Yu, S. Yunoki, J.-M. Liu, and E. Dagotto, Origin of multiferroic spiral spin order in theRMnO 3 perovskites, Phys. Rev. B78, 155121 (2008)

    2008

  49. [57]

    Azhar and M

    M. Azhar and M. Mostovoy, Incommensurate Spiral Or- der from Double-Exchange Interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 027203 (2017)

    2017

  50. [58]

    Prokopczyk and J

    J. Prokopczyk and J. Herbrych, Doping theS= 1 anti- ferromagnet in one dimension, Phys. Rev. B113, 024424 (2026)

    2026

  51. [59]

    Guo and Q.-F

    A.-M. Guo and Q.-F. Sun, Spin-dependent electron transport in protein-like single-helical molecules, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA111, 11658 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    Dagotto, S

    E. Dagotto, S. Yunoki, A. L. Malvezzi, A. Moreo, J. Hu, S. Capponi, D. Poilblanc, and N. Furukawa, Ferromag- netic Kondo model for manganites: Phase diagram, charge segregation, and influence of quantum localized spins, Phys. Rev. B58, 6414 (1998)

    1998

  53. [61]

    M. S. D. A. Hussein, M. Daghofer, E. Dagotto, and A. Moreo, Phenomenological three-orbital spin-fermion model for cuprates, Phys. Rev. B98, 035124 (2018). 7

    2018

  54. [62]

    Moraghebi, S

    M. Moraghebi, S. Yunoki, and A. Moreo, Robust D- Wave Pairing Correlations in a Hole-Doped Spin-Fermion Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 187001 (2002)

    2002

  55. [63]

    Martin and C

    I. Martin and C. D. Batista, Itinerant Electron-Driven Chiral Magnetic Ordering and Spontaneous Quantum Hall Effect in Triangular Lattice Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156402 (2008)

    2008

  56. [64]

    Yunoki, J

    S. Yunoki, J. Hu, A. L. Malvezzi, A. Moreo, N. Furukawa, and E. Dagotto, Phase Separation in Electronic Models for Manganites, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 845 (1998)

    1998

  57. [65]

    Kiran, S

    V. Kiran, S. R. Cohen, and R. Naaman, Structure de- pendent spin selectivity in electron transport through oligopeptides, J. Chem. Phys.146, 092302 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Fransson, Should it really be that hard to model the chirality induced spin selectivity effect?, APL Comp

    J. Fransson, Should it really be that hard to model the chirality induced spin selectivity effect?, APL Comp. Phys.1, 020903 (2025)

    2025

  59. [67]

    G. L. J. A. Rikken and N. Avarvari, Comparing Elec- trical Magnetochiral Anisotropy and Chirality-Induced Spin Selectivity, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.14, 9727 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    The associated transient current would additionally in- duce a magnetic moment due to the (here largely non- relativistic) Edelstein effect, but the interaction of this moment with the substrate magnetization is likely a sec- ondary effect [21]

  61. [69]

    Grechnev, I

    A. Grechnev, I. Di Marco, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Licht- enstein, J. Wills, and O. Eriksson, Theory of bulk and surface quasiparticle spectra for Fe, Co, and Ni, Phys. Rev. B76, 035107 (2007)

    2007

  62. [70]

    Hausoel, M

    A. Hausoel, M. Karolak, E. S ¸a¸ sloˇ glu, A. Lichtenstein, K. Held, A. Katanin, A. Toschi, and G. Sangiovanni, Lo- cal magnetic moments in iron and nickel at ambient and Earth’s core conditions, Nat. Commun.8, 16062 (2017)

    2017

  63. [71]

    D. M. Janas, A. Windischbacher, A. Sala, V. Feyer, I. Cojocariu, M. Gruber, M. Bouatou, A. Droghetti, P. Puschnig, G. Zamborlini, and M. Cinchetti, Correlation-Drivend-Band Modifications Promote Chemical Bonding at 3d-Ferromagnetic Surfaces, Small 13, e08952 (2025)

    2025

  64. [72]

    All data discussed in this paper are available athttps: //github.com/jacekherbrych/DataRepository

  65. [73]

    Castellani, C

    C. Castellani, C. R. Natoli, and J. Ranninger, Magnetic structure of V 2O3 in the insulating phase, Phys. Rev. B 18, 4945 (1978)

    1978

  66. [74]

    A. M. Ole´ s, Antiferromagnetism and correlation of elec- trons in transition metals, Phys. Rev. B28, 327 (1983)

    1983

  67. [75]

    Gutierrez, E

    R. Gutierrez, E. D´ ıaz, C. Gaul, T. Brumme, F. Dom´ ınguez-Adame, and G. Cuniberti, Modeling Spin Transport in Helical Fields: Derivation of an Effective Low-Dimensional Hamiltonian, J. Phys. Chem. C117, 22276 (2013)

    2013

  68. [76]

    K¨ ohler and D

    A. K¨ ohler and D. Beljonne, The Singlet–Triplet Ex- change Energy in Conjugated Polymers, Adv. Funct. Mater.14, 11 (2004). 8 END MA TTER Appendix A: Slater-Koster Approach —The Slater-Koster (SK) approach is based on hopping ampli- tudes tabulated for thep x andp y orbitals [...

    2004

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.