Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law

As of 10 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 13 of 13 outbound references and 1 inbound Pith citation observation for arXiv:2605.30497.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2605.30497 v1

Coverage vector

measured 13 of 13 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

measured 14 of 14 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00

measured 1 of 1 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-01T09:12:22.387213Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

13 of 13 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact1
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved8
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier1
  • metadata mismatch3

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 4ecd9413-7db0-4515-90aa-e6d9e4a56a28 · outbound

This paper cites DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelines

Reference 1

Resolution
metadata mismatch
local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-29T07:43:13.869828Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:db39354ebf8e92ef72f70e408d22d038e9b3fa5a332b43f1643a2b457cdaa3aa

Observation 6a02a7d3-ea34-45a9-a0aa-9b3a25f32832 · outbound

This paper cites LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law LegalBench-RAG: A Benchmark for Retrieval-Augmented Generation in the Legal Domain

Reference 2

Resolution
metadata mismatch
arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-29T07:43:13.872758Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:d72f6c7825e3519cd04d39e5a8388d69d25057546c61b12a50550423fea0540d

Observation d4b4769f-48af-4d94-b48c-edab0768f045 · outbound

This paper cites The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 16(1):111– 133.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, 16(1):111– 133

Reference 3

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:0d91119561336e9fb3292b0741e967634ff63efa734f0960173e0852c31f8d35

Observation a2794488-0251-4685-a9c1-ac7380d9a6e2 · outbound

This paper cites InTREC, volume 500-225 of NIST Special Publication, pages 109–126.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law InTREC, volume 500-225 of NIST Special Publication, pages 109–126

Reference 4

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:328cc1be0f623124c1891b9cec919691b681d791e7c95efb70f233b70d895980

Observation cb7986f2-d182-40e8-8b90-8a826e895c72 · outbound

This paper cites EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representations.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law EmbeddingGemma: Powerful and Lightweight Text Representations

Reference 5

Resolution
metadata mismatch
local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-29T07:43:13.878390Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:f0856244245c951a55c28b4b49a3c5d651eee05a71c56693e42c62dc34a98b61

Observation 8a6b1fcf-0a5c-4847-a9bb-80bfe45dfca8 · outbound

This paper cites Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law Qwen3 Embedding: Advancing Text Embedding and Reranking Through Foundation Models

Reference 6

Resolution
verified exact
local_arxiv, observed 2026-06-29T07:43:13.880527Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:5af575be228b81e7772acfed1077b606ce87b0c01f17d9006a36c9bb30ef77e1

Observation aecbe7b0-b7e1-4589-8347-75c08c96f8ae · outbound

This paper cites " Fact variation example :.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law " Fact variation example :

Reference 7

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:c4a18a2c1f35cee6ca833b2ee410d2720c90bc72713b06c2f2bae4dd4c803a3b

Observation d0410d31-b0b0-4ae0-9d67-8241ae0e3e46 · outbound

This paper cites Fact variation example :.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law Fact variation example :

Reference 8

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:315f65022f02aa6e93732d61d362f68199a1332e1c3a04a06e41b6d9cb4502b6

Observation 0ffd99ec-518f-4d17-b17a-a5dbd752ad2e · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law Unresolved cited work

Reference 9

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:88d01b8652766f8450e717843e4ce311e54517afd4fa9409db79b225ec8e97e4

Observation 57da0456-abd9-4532-b275-da09d7e1132c · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law Unresolved cited work

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:a5152f205645b016503cd7245b34abc4fb6217e18a1daab6e7303833f11853d1

Observation d3e0ecf2-e5ae-474e-8479-fe0f3d71d472 · outbound

This paper cites - Paraphrase the question to make the legal issue clear.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law - Paraphrase the question to make the legal issue clear

Reference 11

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:4ad93e2e343a22591356b93a9af00fa6b9cab0b59eb1ee571213cac0fce7e640

Observation 5d1a3c15-f859-456b-a0db-76c54a69d7d4 · outbound

This paper cites - Discussion of how the evidence supports or qualifies the answer.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law - Discussion of how the evidence supports or qualifies the answer

Reference 12

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:ab51312c83bd72b96872419c99013488927ea709cbe1bec22a41904025d3ee35

Observation cc06c81b-9364-4d0c-b4e1-f4f97e6a4ef4 · outbound

This paper cites rating.

CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law rating

Reference 13

Resolution
malformed identifier
arxiv_id, observed 2026-06-29T07:43:13.875239Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-10T06:31:04.303077+00:00.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-06-29T07:37:36.187564Z digest=sha256:016ffb8557fc9b818b23bd5a65390d09e57d5f97aad9418209b8ddb8520b4465

Pith citing papers

Observation 94f5a2a1-e652-4e75-b2b9-702d1aba44f0 · inbound

LegalCiteTrust: Benchmarking Citation Trustworthiness in Chinese Long-Form Legal Research Reports cites this paper.

LegalCiteTrust: Benchmarking Citation Trustworthiness in Chinese Long-Form Legal Research Reports CanLegalRAGBench: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Generation on Canadian Case Law

Reference 10

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-01T09:12:22.387213Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-08-01T09:12:22.387213Z digest=sha256:42b93879bf962b97eb183e8ede9a4168f6e2298acc787d7b1bbd4e411655a20b