pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.31132 · v1 · pith:4AE7A5ELnew · submitted 2026-05-29 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

High-redshift GRB 140304A at z = 5.282 with flaring activity: A multi-wavelength study

Shashi. B. Pandey , Amit. K. Ror , A. J. Castro-Tirado , A. Pozanenko , V. Lipunov , S. Jeong , I. H. Park , R. Sanchez-Ramirez
show 43 more authors
B.-B. Zhang D. Xu N. R. Butler C. G. Mundell S. R. Oates P. Y. Minaev A. Volnova J. Bai J. Bloom N. Budnev A. Castellon Ch. Cui M. D. Caballero-Garcia Maria Gritsevich G. Garcia-Segura D. Hiriart A. Valeev S. Castillo-Carrion Yash Sharma Y. Fan E. Gorbovskoy O. Gress S. Guziy Y.-D. Hu Brajesh Kumar Amar Aryan Rahul Gupta E. V. Klunko V. Kornilov A. Kutyrev G. Antipov A. Kuznetsov William H. Lee C. Perez del Pulgar R. Querel M. G. Richer S. E. Schmalz N. Tiurina N. Tungalag K. Zhirkov A. M. Watson Ch. Wang P. Balanutsa
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 21:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords gamma-ray burstshigh-redshiftspectral lagflaressynchrotron radiationprompt emissionmulti-wavelengthafterglow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Positive spectral lag in GRB 140304A tracks its hard-to-soft spectral evolution during prompt emission.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines multi-wavelength observations of the high-redshift gamma-ray burst GRB 140304A at z=5.282, which shows unusual late-time flaring. It measures spectral lags using cross-correlation between energy bands and tracks the evolution of spectral peak energy and magnetic field strength. The study finds positive lag in early gamma-ray data that disappears in X-ray data, tied directly to the burst's hard-to-soft spectral changes. Flares across gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical bands display time delays yet matching shapes, pointing to a shared origin. This pattern supports a picture where flares arise from the same process as the prompt phase.

Core claim

Parameter evolution shows hard-to-soft change in spectral peak energy and magnetic field strength, matching typical long GRBs. GRB 140304A exhibits a rare spectral lag pattern: positive lag appears in early BAT light curves but none in XRT curves. Systematic time delays exist among flare peaks in the three bands, yet optical flares match the morphology of X-ray and gamma-ray flares. The positive lag connects to the hard-to-soft evolution, and the flares link to prompt emission through synchrotron radiation produced by rapid bulk acceleration in the emitting region.

What carries the argument

The morphological correspondence and time delays among multi-band flares interpreted as evidence for synchrotron radiation during rapid bulk acceleration in the emitting region.

If this is right

  • The positive spectral lag follows from the hard-to-soft evolution of peak energy, matching patterns in other long GRBs.
  • Gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical flares connect temporally and morphologically to the prompt emission phase.
  • High-redshift GRBs can display late flaring that constrains correlations across wavelengths.
  • The emitting region in GRB 140304A undergoes rapid bulk acceleration that produces the observed flares via synchrotron radiation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the flares share the prompt mechanism, the central engine or outflow must remain active or restart at late times.
  • Similar lag and flare patterns in additional high-z bursts would suggest the acceleration process operates across cosmic epochs.
  • The absence of lag in XRT data may mark a transition where spectral evolution stabilizes or a different emission component dominates.

Load-bearing premise

The morphological similarity and time delays between flares in different bands indicate they share the same physical mechanism as the prompt emission rather than arising separately.

What would settle it

Detection of similar flares in another high-z GRB that lack matching shapes across bands or show inconsistent time delays would undermine the shared synchrotron mechanism.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.31132 by A. Castellon, A. J. Castro-Tirado, A. Kutyrev, A. Kuznetsov, Amar Aryan, Amit. K. Ror, A. M. Watson, A. Pozanenko, A. Valeev, A. Volnova, B.-B. Zhang, Brajesh Kumar, C. G. Mundell, Ch. Cui, Ch. Wang, C. Perez del Pulgar, D. Hiriart, D. Xu, E. Gorbovskoy, E. V. Klunko, G. Antipov, G. Garcia-Segura, I. H. Park, J. Bai, J. Bloom, K. Zhirkov, Maria Gritsevich, M. D. Caballero-Garcia, M. G. Richer, N. Budnev, N. R. Butler, N. Tiurina, N. Tungalag, O. Gress, P. Balanutsa, P. Y. Minaev, Rahul Gupta, R. Querel, R. Sanchez-Ramirez, S. Castillo-Carrion, S. E. Schmalz, S. Guziy, Shashi. B. Pandey, S. Jeong, S. R. Oates, V. Kornilov, V. Lipunov, William H. Lee, Yash Sharma, Y.-D. Hu, Y. Fan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The multi-band prompt emission background-subtracted light curve of GRB 140304A. The top two panels display the light curve observed by Swift-BAT and the corresponding hardness ratio. The mid￾dle two panels show the light curve from Fermi-GBM’s NaI detector along with its associated hardness ratio. Similarly, the bottom two pan￾els present the light curve from Fermi-GBM’s BGO detector and the corresponding… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Upper panel: the multi-band afterglow light curves of GRB 140304A. The Swift-BAT light curve is shown in blue, Swift-XRT in black, and the optical observations are shown with coloured squares, as shown in the legends. Lower panel: displays the multi-epoch optical to X-ray SEDs corresponding to the time intervals indicated by coloured strips in the upper panel. The optical observations are corrected both fo… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: In the left panel represents the absorbed Ly,α red damping wing is fitted with the Voigt profile. The solid cyan area represents the 68% confidence interval. Similarly, the right panel represents the spectrum and absorption lines detected by the Gran Telescopio Canarias (GTC) on 04 March 2014, from the GRB 140304A afterglow. According to Gao & Mészáros (2015), for flares caused by a re￾verse shock, the dec… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The evolution of prompt emission spectral parameters obtained from the fitting of Fermi-GBM observations of GRB 140304A. From top to bottom, the panel 1, the evolution of the low energy spec￾tral index (α) is shown, obtained from the fitting of the Band and Band+Blackbody functions. Similarly, panels 2 and 3, respectively, show the evolution of Ep and β. Panels 4 and 5 represent the evolution of magnetic f… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Spectral lags obtained from the cross-correlation function using the prompt emission light curve in two energy bands 50−100 keV and 15−25 keV of Swift-BAT (yellow legends) and 0.3−1.5 keV and 1.5− 10 keV of Swift-XRT from the early afterglow phase (grey legends). The yellow diamonds for z < 5 represent the spectral lag taken from the literature Li et al. (2012b); Ukwatta et al. (2012). The grey circles for… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Upper panel: Comparison of column density of GRB 140304A with the GRB-DLA compilation by Cucchiara et al. (2015), and the QSO-DLA by Sánchez-Ramírez et al. (2016). QSO-DLA information is complemented with the log(NH,Opt) ≥ 20 DLAs from the SDSS sam￾ple (Noterdaeme et al. 2012; Ranjan et al. 2020). Middle panel: The hydrogen column density log(NH,X ) obtained from fitting of Swift-XRT spectra is plotted as … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Upper left: GRB 140304A in the combination of Ep and Eiso vs. T90 (Minaev & Pozanenko 2020). Upper right: GRB 140304A is shown in the Ep-T90 plane, along with other GRBs at high redshifts (z > 5). Ep ∼ 88 of the burst is calculated from fitting a Band function to the Joint XRT-BAT spectra. Middle left: GRB 140304A in the Γ-T90 plane. Γ of the burst is calculated from the Joint spectral fitting of XRT and B… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Context. This article presents a detailed multi-wavelength analysis of GRB 140304A at z = 5.282, having uncommon late-time flaring features. The aim is to study GRB 140304A and other similar bursts to understand stellar evolution and formation processes at high-z. Aims. GRBs at high-z, possible flaring activities at different frequencies seen at relatively late-times, help to constrain temporal correlation among contemporaneous flares. In the present study, we plan to constrain such a temporal and spectral study for a sample of high-z bursts, including GRB 140304A. Methods. We use Swift, Fermi, and ground-based observations to constrain the temporal and spectral properties of the prompt and afterglow emissions. Using the cross-correlation function, we calculate the spectral lag in the light curves observed in two energy bands of Swift's Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) and X-ray Telescope (XRT). Results. Parameter evolution of the prompt emission analysis reveals a hard-to-soft evolution of the spectral peak energy (Ep) and the magnetic field strength (B), consistent with the typical population of long GRBs. For GRB 140304A, a rare pattern of spectral lag evolution having positive lag in the early BAT light curves, but no lag is observed in the XRT light curves. We have also observed systematic time delays among the peak times of flares in three different bands, but the optical flares exhibit a morphological correspondence with X-ray or gamma-ray flares. Conclusions. Our analysis shows that the observed positive spectral lag in GRB 140304A is closely related to the hard-to-soft spectral evolution during the prompt emission phase, as seen in some of the other long GRBs. Additionally, there is a clear connection between gamma-ray, X-ray and optical flares with prompt emission, which are produced through synchrotron radiation during rapid bulk acceleration within the emitting region.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength analysis of GRB 140304A at z=5.282 using Swift, Fermi, and ground-based data. It examines prompt emission properties including hard-to-soft evolution of the spectral peak energy Ep and magnetic field B, computes spectral lags via cross-correlation function between BAT and XRT bands (finding positive lag early in BAT but none in XRT), identifies systematic time delays among gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical flares with morphological similarities, and concludes that the lag relates to spectral evolution while the flares connect to prompt emission through synchrotron radiation produced during rapid bulk acceleration in the emitting region.

Significance. If the flare interpretation holds with quantitative backing, the work would strengthen constraints on emission mechanisms in high-redshift long GRBs and the link between prompt and late-time activity. The reported spectral lag pattern and Ep evolution are consistent with known long GRB populations. The manuscript employs standard observational techniques (CCF for lags, spectral fitting) but the central flare claim rests on qualitative timing and morphology without demonstrated parameter consistency across bands.

major comments (1)
  1. [Conclusions] Conclusions: The claim that gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical flares are produced through synchrotron radiation during rapid bulk acceleration within the emitting region is based on reported systematic time delays and morphological correspondence. No quantitative support is shown, such as forward-modeling of light-curve shapes, derivation of consistent B-field or Lorentz-factor values across bands, or exclusion of separate internal-shock origins. This leaves the causal interpretation under-constrained for the central claim.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address the major comment regarding the quantitative support for the flare interpretation point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Conclusions] Conclusions: The claim that gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical flares are produced through synchrotron radiation during rapid bulk acceleration within the emitting region is based on reported systematic time delays and morphological correspondence. No quantitative support is shown, such as forward-modeling of light-curve shapes, derivation of consistent B-field or Lorentz-factor values across bands, or exclusion of separate internal-shock origins. This leaves the causal interpretation under-constrained for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that the central claim in the Conclusions relies on the observed systematic time delays between gamma-ray, X-ray, and optical flares together with their morphological similarities, without additional quantitative elements such as forward-modeling of the light-curve profiles or explicit derivation of consistent B-field strengths and Lorentz factors across the three bands. The manuscript does present Ep and B evolution for the prompt phase and notes the connection to prompt emission via synchrotron radiation, but these are not extended to a multi-band parameter consistency check for the flares themselves, nor is an alternative internal-shock scenario quantitatively excluded. We will revise the Conclusions (and relevant discussion sections) to present the synchrotron-in-accelerating-region scenario as a plausible interpretation supported by the timing and morphological evidence, while explicitly acknowledging the absence of the quantitative modeling mentioned by the referee and briefly discussing possible alternative origins. This change will be made in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results derived from direct data analysis

full rationale

The paper performs observational analysis of GRB 140304A using cross-correlation functions on BAT/XRT light curves to measure spectral lags and spectral fitting to track Ep and B evolution. The central claims link the positive lag to observed hard-to-soft Ep evolution and note morphological/time-delay correspondences among flares, without any reduction of predictions to fitted inputs by construction, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The synchrotron/rapid-acceleration interpretation is presented as a qualitative inference from timing data rather than a derived quantity that collapses to the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are detailed beyond standard GRB modeling assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • Spectral peak energy Ep
    Evolved during prompt emission and fitted from spectral data.
  • Magnetic field strength B
    Evolved during prompt emission and compared to long GRB population.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Synchrotron radiation as the emission mechanism linking flares to prompt emission
    Invoked in the conclusions to explain flare connections and time delays.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6170 in / 1562 out tokens · 39562 ms · 2026-06-28T21:42:49.935917+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Early Optical Follow-up of Gamma-Ray Bursts: The Critical Role of Robotic Telescopes

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    A review of early optical GRB features including prompt emission, reverse shocks, and afterglow onset, highlighting robotic telescopes' role in constraining jet Lorentz factors and magnetization.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

234 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2011, , 526, A154

    Afonso , P., Greiner , J., Pian , E., et al. 2011, , 526, A154

    2011

  2. [2]

    P., Alexandroff , R., Allende Prieto , C., et al

    Ahn , C. P., Alexandroff , R., Allende Prieto , C., et al. 2012, , 203, 21

    2012

  3. [3]

    P., Anand , S., et al

    Ahumada , T., Singer , L. P., Anand , S., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 917

    2021

  4. [4]

    2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 372, 233

    Amati, L. 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 372, 233

    2006

  5. [5]

    P., Al Rasyid , H., Dainotti , M

    Arumaningtyas , E. P., Al Rasyid , H., Dainotti , M. G., & Yonetoku , D. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 51

    2024

  6. [6]

    2025 a , , 281, 20

    Aryan , A., Chen , T.-W., Yang , S., et al. 2025 a , , 281, 20

    2025

  7. [7]

    B., Gupta , R., Ror , A

    Aryan , A., Pandey , S. B., Gupta , R., Ror , A. K., & Castro-Tirado , A. J. 2025 b , in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 59, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 145--152

    2025

  8. [8]

    B., Abdo , A

    Atwood , W. B., Abdo , A. A., Ackermann , M., et al. 2009, , 697, 1071

    2009

  9. [9]

    Augustine , K. A. & Chang , H.-K. 2025, , 981, 173

    2025

  10. [10]

    1993, , 413, 281

    Band , D., Matteson , J., Ford , L., et al. 1993, , 413, 281

    1993

  11. [11]

    Band , D. L. 1997, , 486, 928

    1997

  12. [12]

    Barkov , M. V. & Pozanenko , A. S. 2011, , 417, 2161

    2011

  13. [13]

    D., Barbier , L

    Barthelmy , S. D., Barbier , L. M., Cummings , J. R., et al. 2005, , 120, 143

    2005

  14. [14]

    D., Baumgartner , W

    Barthelmy , S. D., Baumgartner , W. H., Cummings , J. R., et al. 2010, GRB Coordinates Network, 11218, 1

    2010

  15. [15]

    D., Krimm , H

    Barthelmy , S. D., Krimm , H. A., Laha , S., et al. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 35761, 1

    2024

  16. [16]

    G., Savaglio , S., et al

    Basa , S., Cuby , J. G., Savaglio , S., et al. 2012, , 542, A103

    2012

  17. [17]

    H., Barthelmy , S

    Baumgartner , W. H., Barthelmy , S. D., Cummings , J. R., et al. 2014, GRB Coordinates Network, 15927, 1

    2014

  18. [18]

    P., Evans , P

    Beardmore , A. P., Evans , P. A., Goad , M. R., & Osborne , J. P. 2014, GRB Coordinates Network, 15925, 1

    2014

  19. [19]

    & Kumar , P

    Beniamini , P. & Kumar , P. 2016, , 457, L108

    2016

  20. [20]

    L., et al

    Berger , E., Chary , R., Cowie , L. L., et al. 2007, , 665, 102

    2007

  21. [21]

    2010, SWarp: Resampling and Co-adding FITS Images Together , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.068

    Bertin , E. 2010, SWarp: Resampling and Co-adding FITS Images Together , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.068

    2010

  22. [22]

    & Arnouts , S

    Bertin , E. & Arnouts , S. 1996, , 117, 393

    1996

  23. [23]

    Blandford , R. D. & McKee , C. F. 1976, Physics of Fluids, 19, 1130

    1976

  24. [24]

    L., Damerdji , Y., et al

    Bo \"e r , M., Atteia , J. L., Damerdji , Y., et al. 2006, , 638, L71

    2006

  25. [25]

    2018, , 609, A62

    Bolmer , J., Greiner , J., Kr \"u hler , T., et al. 2018, , 609, A62

    2018

  26. [26]

    M., Fragos , T., Salafia , O

    Briel , M. M., Fragos , T., Salafia , O. S., et al. 2025, , 701, A84

    2025

  27. [27]

    2025, , 695, A239

    Brivio , R., Campana , S., Covino , S., et al. 2025, , 695, A239

    2025

  28. [28]

    2011, , 739, L55

    Bromberg , O., Nakar , E., & Piran , T. 2011, , 739, L55

    2011

  29. [29]

    & Loeb , A

    Bromm , V. & Loeb , A. 2006, , 642, 382

    2006

  30. [30]

    Y., Krushinsky , V

    Burdanov , A. Y., Krushinsky , V. V., & Popov , A. A. 2014, Astrophysical Bulletin, 69, 368

    2014

  31. [31]

    Burgess , J. M. 2014, , 445, 2589

    2014

  32. [32]

    M., B \'e gu \'e , D., Greiner , J., et al

    Burgess , J. M., B \'e gu \'e , D., Greiner , J., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 174

    2020

  33. [33]

    N., Hill , J

    Burrows , D. N., Hill , J. E., Nousek , J. A., et al. 2005 a , , 120, 165

    2005

  34. [34]

    N., Romano , P., Falcone , A., et al

    Burrows , D. N., Romano , P., Falcone , A., et al. 2005 b , Science, 309, 1833

    2005

  35. [35]

    2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol

    Butler , N., Klein , C., Fox , O., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8446, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy IV, ed. I. S. McLean , S. K. Ramsay , & H. Takami , 844610

    2012

  36. [36]

    M., Kutyrev , A., et al

    Butler , N., Watson , A. M., Kutyrev , A., et al. 2014 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 15937, 1

    2014

  37. [37]

    M., Kutyrev , A., et al

    Butler , N., Watson , A. M., Kutyrev , A., et al. 2014 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 15928, 1

    2014

  38. [38]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1101

    Campana , S., Ghirlanda , G., Salvaterra , R., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 1101

    2022

  39. [39]

    C., de Ugarte Postigo , A., et al

    Campana , S., Th \"o ne , C. C., de Ugarte Postigo , A., et al. 2010, , 402, 2429

    2010

  40. [40]

    J., Gupta , R., Pandey , S

    Castro-Tirado , A. J., Gupta , R., Pandey , S. B., et al. 2024, , 683, A55

    2024

  41. [41]

    J., Jel \' nek , M., V \' tek , S., et al

    Castro-Tirado , A. J., Jel \' nek , M., V \' tek , S., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7019, Advanced Software and Control for Astronomy II, ed. A. Bridger & N. M. Radziwill , 70191V

    2008

  42. [42]

    GRB 130606A within a sub-DLA at redshift 5.91

    Castro-Tirado , A. J., S \'a nchez-Ram \' rez , R., Ellison , S. L., et al. 2013, arXiv; In-prepration, arXiv:1312.5631

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    B., Butler , N

    Cenko , S. B., Butler , N. R., Ofek , E. O., et al. 2010, , 140, 224

    2010

  44. [44]

    Z., Peng , Z

    Chang , X. Z., Peng , Z. Y., Chen , J. M., et al. 2021, , 922, 34

    2021

  45. [45]

    B., et al

    Chornock, R., Berger, E., Fox, D. B., et al. 2014, arXiv: Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics

    2014

  46. [46]

    Y., Tanvir , N

    Cordier , B., Wei , J. Y., Tanvir , N. R., et al. 2025, , 704, L7

    2025

  47. [47]

    2015, , 804, 51

    Cucchiara , A., Fumagalli , M., Rafelski , M., et al. 2015, , 804, 51

    2015

  48. [48]

    J., Fox , D

    Cucchiara , A., Levan , A. J., Fox , D. B., et al. 2011, , 736, 7

    2011

  49. [49]

    2014 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 15921, 1

    de Ugarte Postigo , A., Gorosabel , J., Xu , D., et al. 2014 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 15921, 1

    2014

  50. [50]

    2011, , 525, A109

    de Ugarte Postigo , A., Horv \'a th , I., Veres , P., et al. 2011, , 525, A109

    2011

  51. [51]

    2014 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 15924, 1

    de Ugarte Postigo , A., Xu , D., Gorosabel , J., et al. 2014 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 15924, 1

    2014

  52. [52]

    C., et al

    D'Elia , V., Maselli , A., Stroh , M. C., et al. 2013, GRB Coordinates Network, 15623, 1

    2013

  53. [53]

    2025, Submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2512.07731

    Dereli-B \'e gu \'e , H., Pe'er , A., B \'e gu \'e , D., Ryde , F., & Gowri , A. 2025, Submitted to ApJ, arXiv:2512.07731

    work page arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    & Wyithe , J

    Dijkstra , M. & Wyithe , J. S. B. 2007, , 379, 1589

    2007

  55. [55]

    A., Beardmore , A

    Evans , P. A., Beardmore , A. P., Burrows , D. N., et al. 2014, GRB Coordinates Network, 15915, 1

    2014

  56. [56]

    A., Beardmore , A

    Evans , P. A., Beardmore , A. P., Page , K. L., et al. 2009, , 397, 1177

    2009

  57. [57]

    A., Beardmore , A

    Evans , P. A., Beardmore , A. P., Page , K. L., et al. 2007, , 469, 379

    2007

  58. [58]

    D., Morris , D., Racusin , J., et al

    Falcone , A. D., Morris , D., Racusin , J., et al. 2007, , 671, 1921

    2007

  59. [59]

    D., Kutyrev , A

    Fox , O. D., Kutyrev , A. S., Rapchun , D. A., et al. 2012, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 8453, High Energy, Optical, and Infrared Detectors for Astronomy V, ed. A. D. Holland & J. W. Beletic , 84531O

    2012

  60. [60]

    L., Madore , B

    Freedman , W. L., Madore , B. F., Gibson , B. K., et al. 2001, , 553, 47

    2001

  61. [61]

    L., Lien , A

    Fryer , C. L., Lien , A. Y., Fruchter , A., et al. 2022, , 929, 111

    2022

  62. [62]

    2013, , 57, 141

    Gao , H., Lei , W.-H., Zou , Y.-C., Wu , X.-F., & Zhang , B. 2013, , 57, 141

    2013

  63. [63]

    & M \'e sz \'a ros , P

    Gao , H. & M \'e sz \'a ros , P. 2015, Advances in Astronomy, 2015, 192383

    2015

  64. [64]

    2021, , 656, A134

    Gao , H.-X., Geng , J.-J., & Huang , Y.-F. 2021, , 656, A134

    2021

  65. [65]

    Gehrels, N. et al. 2004, The Astrophysical Journal, 611, 1005

    2004

  66. [66]

    , et al

    Godet , O., Nasser , G., Atteia , J. ., et al. 2014, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 9144, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2014: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. T. Takahashi , J.-W. A. den Herder , & M. Bautz , 914424

    2014

  67. [67]

    V., Mazets , E

    Golenetskii , S. V., Mazets , E. P., Aptekar , R. L., & Ilinskii , V. N. 1983, , 306, 451

    1983

  68. [68]

    Z., Butler , N

    Golkhou , V. Z., Butler , N. R., & Littlejohns , O. M. 2015, , 811, 93

    2015

  69. [69]

    1986, , 308, L47

    Goodman , J. 1986, , 308, L47

    1986

  70. [70]

    2014 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 15914, 1

    Gorbovskoy , E., Lipunov , V., Pruzhinskaya , M., et al. 2014 a , GRB Coordinates Network, 15914, 1

    2014

  71. [71]

    2014 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 15932, 1

    Gorbovskoy , E., Lipunov , V., Pruzhinskaya , M., et al. 2014 b , GRB Coordinates Network, 15932, 1

    2014

  72. [72]

    Greiner , J., Kr \"u hler , T., Fynbo , J. P. U., et al. 2009, , 693, 1610

    2009

  73. [73]

    H., Meynet , G., Ekstr \"o m , S., & Georgy , C

    Groh , J. H., Meynet , G., Ekstr \"o m , S., & Georgy , C. 2014, , 564, A30

    2014

  74. [74]

    2022, , 511, 1694

    Gupta , R., Gupta , S., Chattopadhyay , T., et al. 2022, , 511, 1694

    2022

  75. [75]

    R., Pandey , S

    Gupta , R., Oates , S. R., Pandey , S. B., et al. 2021, , 505, 4086

    2021

  76. [76]

    W., Young , K

    Hakkila , J., Giblin , T. W., Young , K. C., et al. 2007, , 169, 62

    2007

  77. [77]

    E., Malesani , D., Fynbo , J

    Hartoog , O. E., Malesani , D., Fynbo , J. P. U., et al. 2015, , 580, A139

    2015

  78. [78]

    E., Morris , D

    Hill , J. E., Morris , D. C., Sakamoto , T., et al. 2006, , 639, 303

    2006

  79. [79]

    T., Irwin , M

    Hodgkin , S. T., Irwin , M. J., Hewett , P. C., & Warren , S. J. 2009, , 394, 675

    2009

  80. [80]

    o ller , M., J \

    Hubrig , S., Sch \"o ller , M., J \"a rvinen , S. P., et al. 2024, , 686, L4

    2024

Showing first 80 references.