pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01706 · v2 · pith:JMLFINCBnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · 💰 econ.EM

Higher-Order Debiased Estimators for General Treatment Models

Yulin Zhang , Lin Liu , Zheng Zhang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 12:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💰 econ.EM
keywords higher-order influence functionsquantile treatment effectsdebiasingnon-separable modelsU-processesM-estimationcausal inferencetreatment effects
0
0 comments X

The pith

Higher-order estimators for quantile treatment effects relax smoothness assumptions on nuisance parameters compared to standard debiasing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper extends higher-order influence function methods, previously used for explicit parameters like average treatment effects, to implicitly defined parameters solved through nonlinear estimating equations. These parameters arise in non-separable structural models and include quantile treatment effects and quantile dose-response functions. Classical semiparametric estimators require strong Holder smoothness conditions on the nuisance functions to attain good convergence rates. The new class of estimators incorporates higher-order terms and applies U-processes theory to weaken those smoothness requirements while retaining the rate improvements.

Core claim

We consider parameters of a class of non-separable structural models in the econometrics literature and develop a class of higher-order estimators for the target parameters. Statistical properties of these higher-order estimators are derived using recent advances in U-processes theory. Our proposed higher-order estimators relax complexity-reducing assumptions, quantified by Holder smoothness, imposed on the nuisance parameters compared to existing alternative estimators for many important parameters in this class, including QTE and quantile dose-response functions, among others.

What carries the argument

higher-order influence functions extended to M/Z-estimation problems for non-separable models, with estimation via U-processes theory

Load-bearing premise

The target parameters admit a representation via higher-order influence functions that can be estimated using U-processes theory while preserving the claimed rate improvements.

What would settle it

A simulation study or real-data example in which nuisance functions have Holder smoothness below the level needed by first-order methods, yet the higher-order estimator still attains the faster convergence rate.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01706 by Lin Liu, Yulin Zhang, Zheng Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison between the first-order (LDML) estimator and the higher-order estimator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A schematic illustration on how to construct the higher-order estimator [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Results for the simulation study Case 1 of estimating the QTE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Results for the simulation study Case 2 of estimating QTE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Normal-QQ plots for the first coordinate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Normal-QQ plots for the second coordinate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p085_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Normal-QQ plots for the first coordinate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normal-QQ plots for the second coordinate of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p086_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sensitivity of the higher-order estimator for the QTE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Sensitivity of the higher-order estimator for the QTE, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p087_10.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

It is now well known that estimators based on influence functions can be sub-optimal in terms of convergence rates in various settings. To address this issue, higher-order influence functions (HOIF) are developed, generalizing the classical semiparametric theory. However, most existing results in this regard focus on treatment effect parameters defined in explicit forms, such as average treatment effects (ATE). In applications, economists are often confronted with tasks of inferring more complex parameters, such as quantile treatment effects (QTE) or effects of complicated treatment regimes/policy. These more complex parameters can often only be implicitly defined as the solution to nonlinear estimating equations, which correspond to M/Z-estimation problems. Our current understanding of these problems is mainly limited to the classical semiparametric theory. Given the foundational role of HOIF for estimating explicit parameters such as ATE, a modest step toward enriching the statistical foundation of econometrics and causal inference is to develop the corresponding higher-order estimators for those more complex parameters. To this end, we consider parameters of a class of non-separable structural models in the econometrics literature and develop a class of higher-order estimators for the target parameters. Statistical properties of these higher-order estimators are derived using recent advances in U-processes theory. Our proposed higher-order estimators relax complexity-reducing assumptions, quantified by Holder smoothness, imposed on the nuisance parameters compared to existing alternative estimators for many important parameters in this class, including QTE and quantile dose-response functions, among others.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a class of higher-order debiased estimators for implicitly defined parameters arising in non-separable structural models, including quantile treatment effects (QTE) and quantile dose-response functions. These estimators extend the higher-order influence function (HOIF) framework from explicit functionals such as the ATE to M/Z-estimation problems; statistical properties are derived via U-processes theory, with the central claim being that the resulting estimators relax the Hölder smoothness requirements imposed on nuisance functions relative to first-order alternatives.

Significance. If the derivations are correct, the work would meaningfully broaden the applicability of HOIF-based debiasing to a range of economically important parameters that are only implicitly defined. The explicit use of recent U-processes results to handle the implicit case is a technical strength that could yield practical rate improvements under weaker regularity conditions.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that statistical properties are derived using U-processes theory but does not indicate the precise order of the influence functions or the form of the U-statistic kernels; adding a short statement of the main convergence-rate theorem (with the relevant section reference) would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the non-separable structural model and the associated estimating equations should be introduced with an explicit example (e.g., the QTE case) early in the paper to anchor the subsequent general development.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. No major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper frames its contribution as an extension of higher-order influence functions from explicit functionals (e.g., ATE) to implicitly defined parameters in non-separable structural models via M/Z-estimation and U-processes theory. No equations, derivations, or self-citations are exhibited that reduce the claimed rate improvements or relaxed Holder smoothness assumptions to fitted inputs by construction, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing author citations. The central premise (existence of HOIF representations preserving rate gains) is presented as a technical step forward rather than a re-expression of prior fitted results, rendering the derivation self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5794 in / 949 out tokens · 20040 ms · 2026-06-28T12:07:31.084786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models

    Alberto Abadie. Semiparametric instrumental variable estimation of treatment response models. Journal of Econometrics, 113 0 (2): 0 231--263, 2003

    2003

  2. [2]

    A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models

    Chunrong Ai, Oliver Linton, Kaiji Motegi, and Zheng Zhang. A unified framework for efficient estimation of general treatment models. Quantitative Economics, 12 0 (3): 0 779--816, 2021

    2021

  3. [3]

    Multivalued treatments and decomposition analysis: An application to the WIA program

    Wallice Ao, Sebastian Calonico, and Ying-Ying Lee. Multivalued treatments and decomposition analysis: An application to the WIA program. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 39 0 (1): 0 358--371, 2021

    2021

  4. [4]

    Bias-aware inference in regularized regression models

    Timothy B Armstrong, Michal Koles \'a r, and Soonwoo Kwon. Bias-aware inference in regularized regression models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.14823, 2020

    work page arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Approximate residual balancing: Debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions

    Susan Athey, Guido W Imbens, and Stefan Wager. Approximate residual balancing: Debiased inference of average treatment effects in high dimensions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 80 0 (4): 0 597--623, 2018

    2018

  6. [6]

    The fundamental limits of structure-agnostic functional estimation

    Sivaraman Balakrishnan, Edward H Kennedy, and Larry Wasserman. The fundamental limits of structure-agnostic functional estimation. Statistical Science, 2026

    2026

  7. [7]

    Some new asymptotic theory for least squares series: Pointwise and uniform results

    Alexandre Belloni, Victor Chernozhukov, Denis Chetverikov, and Kengo Kato. Some new asymptotic theory for least squares series: Pointwise and uniform results. Journal of Econometrics, 186 0 (2): 0 345--366, 2015

    2015

  8. [8]

    Does 401 (k) eligibility increase saving? E vidence from propensity score subclassification

    Daniel J Benjamin. Does 401 (k) eligibility increase saving? E vidence from propensity score subclassification. Journal of Public Economics, 87 0 (5-6): 0 1259--1290, 2003

    2003

  9. [9]

    A class of U -statistics and asymptotic normality of the number of k -clusters

    Rabi N Bhattacharya and Jayanta K Ghosh. A class of U -statistics and asymptotic normality of the number of k -clusters. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 43 0 (2): 0 300--330, 1992

    1992

  10. [10]

    Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models

    Peter J Bickel, Chris A J Klaassen, Ya'acov Ritov, and Jon A Wellner. Efficient and Adaptive Estimation for Semiparametric Models. Johns Hopkins Series in the Mathematical Sciences. Springer New York, 1998. ISBN 9780387984735

    1998

  11. [11]

    Higher-Order Neyman Orthogonality in Moment-Condition Models

    St \'e phane Bonhomme, Koen Jochmans, Whitney K Newey, and Martin Weidner. Higher-order N eyman orthogonality in moment-condition models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.10842, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Fast convergence rates for dose-response estimation

    Matteo Bonvini and Edward H Kennedy. Fast convergence rates for dose-response estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.11825, 2022

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    Sensitivity analysis for marginal structural models

    Matteo Bonvini, Edward Kennedy, Valerie Ventura, and Larry Wasserman. Sensitivity analysis for marginal structural models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.04681, 2022

    work page arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    Doubly-robust inference and optimality in structure-agnostic models with smoothness

    Matteo Bonvini, Edward H Kennedy, Oliver Dukes, and Sivaraman Balakrishnan. Doubly-robust inference and optimality in structure-agnostic models with smoothness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.08525, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  15. [15]

    Adaptive, rate-optimal hypothesis testing in nonparametric IV models

    Christoph Breunig and Xiaohong Chen. Adaptive, rate-optimal hypothesis testing in nonparametric IV models. Econometrica, 92 0 (6): 0 2027--2067, 2024

    2027

  16. [16]

    Augmented balancing weights as linear regression

    David Bruns-Smith, Oliver Dukes, Avi Feller, and Elizabeth L Ogburn. Augmented balancing weights as linear regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 2026

    2026

  17. [17]

    Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability

    Matias D Cattaneo. Efficient semiparametric estimation of multi-valued treatment effects under ignorability. Journal of Econometrics, 155 0 (2): 0 138--154, 2010

    2010

  18. [18]

    Kernel-based semiparametric estimators: Small bandwidth asymptotics and bootstrap consistency

    Matias D Cattaneo and Michael Jansson. Kernel-based semiparametric estimators: Small bandwidth asymptotics and bootstrap consistency. Econometrica, 86 0 (3): 0 955--995, 2018

    2018

  19. [19]

    Two-step estimation and inference with possibly many included covariates

    Matias D Cattaneo, Michael Jansson, and Xinwei Ma. Two-step estimation and inference with possibly many included covariates. The Review of Economic Studies, 86 0 (3): 0 1095--1122, 2019

    2019

  20. [20]

    Large sample properties of partitioning-based series estimators

    Matias D Cattaneo, Max H Farrell, and Yingjie Feng. Large sample properties of partitioning-based series estimators. The Annals of Statistics, 48 0 (3): 0 1718--1741, 2020

    2020

  21. [21]

    Higher-order refinements of small bandwidth asymptotics for density-weighted average derivative estimators

    Matias D Cattaneo, Max H Farrell, Michael Jansson, and Ricardo P Masini. Higher-order refinements of small bandwidth asymptotics for density-weighted average derivative estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 252 0 (Part B): 0 105855, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Bootstrap inference in the presence of bias

    Giuseppe Cavaliere, S \' lvia Gon c alves, Morten rregaard Nielsen, and Edoardo Zanelli. Bootstrap inference in the presence of bias. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 119 0 (548): 0 2908--2918, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Tail bounds for canonical U -statistics and U -processes with unbounded kernels

    Abhishek Chakrabortty and Arun K Kuchibhotla. Tail bounds for canonical U -statistics and U -processes with unbounded kernels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.01318, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Local overidentification and efficiency gains in modern causal inference and data combination

    Xiaohong Chen and Haitian Xie. Local overidentification and efficiency gains in modern causal inference and data combination. arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.16683, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  25. [25]

    Estimation of semiparametric models when the criterion function is not smooth

    Xiaohong Chen, Oliver Linton, and Ingrid Van Keilegom. Estimation of semiparametric models when the criterion function is not smooth. Econometrica, 71 0 (5): 0 1591--1608, 2003

    2003

  26. [26]

    Causal inference of general treatment effects using neural networks with a diverging number of confounders

    Xiaohong Chen, Ying Liu, Shujie Ma, and Zheng Zhang. Causal inference of general treatment effects using neural networks with a diverging number of confounders. Journal of Econometrics, 238 0 (1): 0 105555, 2024 a

    2024

  27. [27]

    Jackknife multiplier bootstrap: Finite sample approximations to the U -process supremum with applications

    Xiaohui Chen and Kengo Kato. Jackknife multiplier bootstrap: Finite sample approximations to the U -process supremum with applications. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 176 0 (3): 0 1097--1163, 2020

    2020

  28. [28]

    Method-of-moments inference for GLM s and doubly-robust functionals under proportional asymptotics

    Xingyu Chen, Lin Liu, and Rajarshi Mukherjee. Method-of-moments inference for GLM s and doubly-robust functionals under proportional asymptotics. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.06103, 2024 b

    work page arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    The effects of 401 (k) participation on the wealth distribution: An instrumental quantile regression analysis

    Victor Chernozhukov and Christian Hansen. The effects of 401 (k) participation on the wealth distribution: An instrumental quantile regression analysis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86 0 (3): 0 735--751, 2004

    2004

  30. [30]

    An IV model of quantile treatment effects

    Victor Chernozhukov and Christian Hansen. An IV model of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica, 73 0 (1): 0 245--261, 2005

    2005

  31. [31]

    Inference on counterfactual distributions

    Victor Chernozhukov, Iv \'a n Fern \'a ndez-Val, and Blaise Melly. Inference on counterfactual distributions. Econometrica, 81 0 (6): 0 2205--2268, 2013

    2013

  32. [32]

    Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters

    Victor Chernozhukov, Denis Chetverikov, Mert Demirer, Esther Duflo, Christian Hansen, Whitney Newey, and James Robins. Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters. The Econometrics Journal, 21 0 (1): 0 C1--C68, 2018

    2018

  33. [33]

    Locally robust semiparametric estimation

    Victor Chernozhukov, Juan Carlos Escanciano, Hidehiko Ichimura, Whitney K Newey, and James M Robins. Locally robust semiparametric estimation. Econometrica, 90 0 (4): 0 1501--1535, 2022

    2022

  34. [34]

    Fisher- S chultz lecture: Linear estimation of structural and causal effects for nonseparable panel data

    Victor Chernozhukov, Ben Deaner, Ying Gao, Jerry Hausman, and Whitney K Newey. Fisher- S chultz lecture: Linear estimation of structural and causal effects for nonseparable panel data. Technical Report 33325, National Bureau of Economic Research, 2025

    2025

  35. [35]

    Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments

    Kyle Colangelo and Ying-Ying Lee. Double debiased machine learning nonparametric inference with continuous treatments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 44 0 (1): 0 67--79, 2026

    2026

  36. [36]

    Estimation and inference for distribution functions and quantile functions in treatment effect models

    Stephen G Donald and Yu-Chin Hsu. Estimation and inference for distribution functions and quantile functions in treatment effect models. Journal of Econometrics, 178: 0 383--397, 2014

    2014

  37. [37]

    Policy learning with -expected welfare

    Yanqin Fan, Yuan Qi, and Gaoqian Xu. Policy learning with -expected welfare. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00256, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects

    Sergio Firpo. Efficient semiparametric estimation of quantile treatment effects. Econometrica, 75 0 (1): 0 259--276, 2007

    2007

  39. [39]

    Uniformly semiparametric efficient estimation of treatment effects with a continuous treatment

    Antonio F Galvao and Liang Wang. Uniformly semiparametric efficient estimation of treatment effects with a continuous treatment. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 110 0 (512): 0 1528--1542, 2015

    2015

  40. [40]

    On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects

    Jinyong Hahn. On the role of the propensity score in efficient semiparametric estimation of average treatment effects. Econometrica, 66 0 (2): 0 315--331, 1998

    1998

  41. [41]

    Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score

    Keisuke Hirano, Guido W Imbens, and Geert Ridder. Efficient estimation of average treatment effects using the estimated propensity score. Econometrica, 71 0 (4): 0 1161--1189, 2003

    2003

  42. [42]

    Sharp structure-agnostic lower bounds for general linear functional estimation

    Jikai Jin and Vasilis Syrgkanis. Sharp structure-agnostic lower bounds for general linear functional estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.17341, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Localized debiased machine learning: Efficient inference on quantile treatment effects and beyond

    Nathan Kallus, Xiaojie Mao, and Masatoshi Uehara. Localized debiased machine learning: Efficient inference on quantile treatment effects and beyond. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 25: 0 1--59, 2024

    2024

  44. [44]

    Nonparametric causal effects based on incremental propensity score interventions

    Edward H Kennedy. Nonparametric causal effects based on incremental propensity score interventions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 114 0 (526): 0 645--656, 2019

    2019

  45. [45]

    Non-parametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effects

    Edward H Kennedy, Zongming Ma, Matthew D McHugh, and Dylan S Small. Non-parametric methods for doubly robust estimation of continuous treatment effects. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology, 79 0 (4): 0 1229--1245, 2017

    2017

  46. [46]

    Minimax rates for heterogeneous causal effect estimation

    Edward H Kennedy, Sivaraman Balakrishnan, James M Robins, and Larry Wasserman. Minimax rates for heterogeneous causal effect estimation. The Annals of Statistics, 52 0 (2): 0 793--816, 2024

    2024

  47. [47]

    Estimation of smooth functionals in high-dimensional models: Bootstrap chains and G aussian approximation

    Vladimir Koltchinskii. Estimation of smooth functionals in high-dimensional models: Bootstrap chains and G aussian approximation. The Annals of Statistics, 50 0 (4): 0 2386--2415, 2022

    2022

  48. [48]

    Semiparametric efficient empirical higher order influence function estimators

    Lin Liu, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Whitney K Newey, and James M Robins. Semiparametric efficient empirical higher order influence function estimators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07577, 2017

    work page arXiv 2017

  49. [49]

    Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators

    Lin Liu, Rajarshi Mukherjee, and James M Robins. Assumption-lean falsification tests of rate double-robustness of double-machine-learning estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 240 0 (2): 0 105500, 2024

    2024

  50. [50]

    Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations

    Charles F Manski. Statistical treatment rules for heterogeneous populations. Econometrica, 72 0 (4): 0 1221--1246, 2004

    2004

  51. [51]

    Nuisance function tuning and sample splitting for optimal doubly robust estimation

    Sean McGrath and Rajarshi Mukherjee. Nuisance function tuning and sample splitting for optimal doubly robust estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14857, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Semiparametric efficiency bounds

    Whitney K Newey. Semiparametric efficiency bounds. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 5 0 (2): 0 99--135, 1990

    1990

  53. [53]

    Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing

    Whitney K Newey and Daniel McFadden. Large sample estimation and hypothesis testing. Handbook of Econometrics, 4: 0 2111--2245, 1994

    1994

  54. [54]

    Cross-Fitting and Fast Remainder Rates for Semiparametric Estimation

    Whitney K Newey and James M Robins. Cross-fitting and fast remainder rates for semiparametric estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.09138, 2018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Twicing kernels and a small bias property of semiparametric estimators

    Whitney K Newey, Fushing Hsieh, and James M Robins. Twicing kernels and a small bias property of semiparametric estimators. Econometrica, 72 0 (3): 0 947--962, 2004

    2004

  56. [56]

    Dynamic semiparametric models for expected shortfall (and value-at-risk)

    Andrew J Patton, Johanna F Ziegel, and Rui Chen. Dynamic semiparametric models for expected shortfall (and value-at-risk). Journal of Econometrics, 211 0 (2): 0 388--413, 2019

    2019

  57. [57]

    Quantile treatment effects in the presence of covariates

    David Powell. Quantile treatment effects in the presence of covariates. Review of Economics and Statistics, 102 0 (5): 0 994--1005, 2020

    2020

  58. [58]

    Causal etiology of the research of J ames M

    Thomas S Richardson and Andrea Rotnitzky. Causal etiology of the research of J ames M . R obins. Statistical Science, 29 0 (4): 0 459--484, 2014

    2014

  59. [59]

    Comment: Performance of double-robust estimators when ``inverse probability'' weights are highly variable

    James Robins, Mariela Sued, Quanhong Lei-Gomez, and Andrea Rotnitzky. Comment: Performance of double-robust estimators when ``inverse probability'' weights are highly variable. Statistical Science, 22 0 (4): 0 544--559, 2007

    2007

  60. [60]

    Higher order influence functions and minimax estimation of nonlinear functionals

    James Robins, Lingling Li, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, and Aad van der Vaart. Higher order influence functions and minimax estimation of nonlinear functionals. In Probability and Statistics: Essays in Honor of David A. Freedman, pages 335--421. Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2008

    2008

  61. [61]

    Semiparametric minimax rates

    James Robins, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen , Lingling Li, and Aad van der Vaart . Semiparametric minimax rates. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 3: 0 1305--1321, 2009

    2009

  62. [62]

    Technical Report: Higher Order Influence Functions and Minimax Estimation of Nonlinear Functionals

    James Robins, Lingling Li, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen , and Aad van der Vaart . Technical report: Higher order influence functions and minimax estimation of nonlinear functionals. arXiv preprint arXiv:1601.05820, 2016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    Toward a curse of dimensionality appropriate ( CODA ) asymptotic theory for semi-parametric models

    James M Robins and Ya'acov Ritov. Toward a curse of dimensionality appropriate ( CODA ) asymptotic theory for semi-parametric models. Statistics in Medicine, 16 0 (3): 0 285--319, 1997

    1997

  64. [64]

    Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed

    James M Robins, Andrea Rotnitzky, and Lue Ping Zhao. Estimation of regression coefficients when some regressors are not always observed. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89 0 (427): 0 846--866, 1994

    1994

  65. [65]

    Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology

    James M Robins, Miguel A Hern \'a n, and Babette Brumback. Marginal structural models and causal inference in epidemiology. Epidemiology, 11 0 (5): 0 550--560, 2000

    2000

  66. [66]

    Minimax estimation of a functional on a structured high-dimensional model ( C orrected version)

    James M Robins, Lingling Li, Lin Liu, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen, and Aad van der Vaart. Minimax estimation of a functional on a structured high-dimensional model ( C orrected version). arXiv preprint arXiv:1512.02174, 2023

    work page arXiv 2023

  67. [67]

    Characterization of parameters with a mixed bias property

    Andrea Rotnitzky, Ezequiel Smucler, and James M Robins. Characterization of parameters with a mixed bias property. Biometrika, 108 0 (1): 0 231--238, 2021

    2021

  68. [68]

    On asymptotically efficient estimation in semiparametric models

    Anton Schick. On asymptotically efficient estimation in semiparametric models. The Annals of Statistics, 14 0 (3): 0 1139--1151, 1986

    1986

  69. [69]

    The hardness of conditional independence testing and the generalised covariance measure

    Rajen D Shah and Jonas Peters. The hardness of conditional independence testing and the generalised covariance measure. The Annals of Statistics, 48 0 (3): 0 1514--1538, 2020

    2020

  70. [70]

    Optimal global rates of convergence for nonparametric regression

    Charles J Stone. Optimal global rates of convergence for nonparametric regression. The Annals of Statistics, 10 0 (4): 0 1040--1053, 1982

    1982

  71. [71]

    Non-separable models with high-dimensional data

    Liangjun Su, Takuya Ura, and Yichong Zhang. Non-separable models with high-dimensional data. Journal of Econometrics, 212 0 (2): 0 646--677, 2019

    2019

  72. [72]

    On doubly robust estimation in a semiparametric odds ratio model

    Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, James M Robins, and Andrea Rotnitzky. On doubly robust estimation in a semiparametric odds ratio model. Biometrika, 97 0 (1): 0 171--180, 2010

    2010

  73. [73]

    Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: with Applications to Statistics

    Aad W van der Vaart and Jon Wellner. Weak Convergence and Empirical Processes: with Applications to Statistics. Springer Science & Business Media, 2023

    2023

  74. [74]

    Deep M ed: Semiparametric causal mediation analysis with debiased deep learning

    Siqi Xu, Lin Liu, and Zhonghua Liu. Deep M ed: Semiparametric causal mediation analysis with debiased deep learning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, pages 28238--28251, 2022

    2022

  75. [75]

    Perturbed double machine learning: Nonstandard inference beyond the parametric length

    Mengchu Zheng, Matteo Bonvini, and Zijian Guo. Perturbed double machine learning: Nonstandard inference beyond the parametric length. arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.01222, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  76. [76]

    Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions

    Chunrong Ai and Xiaohong Chen. Efficient estimation of models with conditional moment restrictions containing unknown functions. Econometrica, 71 0 (6): 0 1795--1843, 2003

    2003

  77. [77]

    Empirical process methods in econometrics

    Donald WK Andrews. Empirical process methods in econometrics. Handbook of Econometrics, 4: 0 2247--2294, 1994

    1994

  78. [78]

    Matrix chaos inequalities and chaos of combinatorial type

    Afonso S Bandeira, Kevin Lucca, Petar Nizic-Nikolac, and Ramon van Handel. Matrix chaos inequalities and chaos of combinatorial type. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pages 795--805, 2025

    2025

  79. [79]

    Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference

    Michael R Kosorok. Introduction to Empirical Processes and Semiparametric Inference. Springer, 2008

    2008

  80. [80]

    When is it worthwhile to jackknife? B reaking the quadratic barrier for Z -estimators

    Licong Lin, Fangzhou Su, Wenlong Mou, Peng Ding, and Martin Wainwright. When is it worthwhile to jackknife? B reaking the quadratic barrier for Z -estimators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.02909, 2024

    work page arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.