pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.01835 · v1 · pith:A5IKIFLOnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · physics.atom-ph

Noise spectroscopy of two-body loss as a probe of dynamical bulk viscosity in ultracold atomic gases

Tingyu Zhang , Hiroyuki Tajima , Takeo Kato This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 11:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas physics.atom-ph
keywords two-body lossbulk viscositynoise spectroscopyultracold atomic gasescontact operatorLindblad equationquantum gasesdynamical viscosity
0
0 comments X

The pith

The correlated noise of two-body loss current provides direct access to dynamical bulk viscosity in weakly dissipative quantum gases.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to show that noise spectroscopy of two-body losses can measure dynamical bulk viscosity, which has been difficult to access experimentally. Starting from the Lindblad equation, the authors derive that the noise power spectrum, after subtracting shot noise, is proportional to contact operator correlations. They then use the known exact relation between those correlations and bulk viscosity to establish the correspondence. This would matter because it offers a new experimental probe using existing loss measurements in ultracold gases.

Core claim

We show that the correlated noise of the two-body loss current provides access to the dynamical bulk viscosity in weakly dissipative quantum gases. Starting from the Lindblad equation for weak inelastic losses, we derive the loss-current operator. After subtracting the leading Poissonian shot-noise background, the remaining noise power spectrum of two-body loss current is found proportional to the equilibrium correlation function of the contact operator. Combining this result with the exact relation between contact correlations and bulk viscosity, we demonstrate the correspondence between the measurable loss-current noise and the bulk-viscosity. Our result identifies the higher-order fluctua

What carries the argument

The loss-current operator derived from the Lindblad equation for weak inelastic losses, whose noise power spectrum is proportional to the contact operator correlation function that is exactly related to bulk viscosity.

If this is right

  • Dynamical bulk viscosity can be extracted from measurements of loss current noise in ultracold atomic gas experiments.
  • The correspondence holds in the weakly dissipative regime near equilibrium.
  • Higher-order fluctuations in two-body loss rates serve as a probe for the bulk viscosity transport coefficient.
  • This provides an alternative to direct hydrodynamic measurements for viscosity in quantum gases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar fluctuation measurements could be applied to other loss processes or transport coefficients if exact operator relations exist.
  • This method may allow viscosity probing in systems where traditional flow experiments are challenging.
  • Extensions to strongly dissipative regimes would require checking additional corrections to the contact-viscosity relation.

Load-bearing premise

The Lindblad master equation for weak inelastic losses accurately captures the dissipative dynamics near equilibrium for the contact-viscosity identity to hold without extra corrections.

What would settle it

Perform noise spectroscopy on two-body loss in a unitary Fermi gas and compare the extracted bulk viscosity spectrum to values obtained from independent methods such as expansion dynamics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.01835 by Hiroyuki Tajima, Takeo Kato, Tingyu Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Dimensionless noise power spectrum of the two-body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Fano factor for correlated noise of pure two-body [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We show that the correlated noise of the two-body loss current provides access to the dynamical bulk viscosity in weakly dissipative quantum gases. Starting from the Lindblad equation for weak inelastic losses, we derive the loss-current operator. After subtracting the leading Poissonian shot-noise background, the remaining noise power spectrum of two-body loss current is found proportional to the equilibrium correlation function of the contact operator. Combining this result with the exact relation between contact correlations and bulk viscosity, we demonstrate the correspondence between the measurable loss-current noise and the bulk-viscosity. Our result identifies the higher-order fluctuation of two-body loss as a probe of dynamical bulk viscosity, whose measurement has remained elusive in experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that, starting from the Lindblad master equation for weak inelastic two-body losses, the noise power spectrum of the loss current (after subtraction of the leading Poissonian contribution) is proportional to the equilibrium correlation function of the contact operator; combined with an existing exact relation between contact correlations and bulk viscosity, this establishes a direct correspondence between measurable loss-current noise and dynamical bulk viscosity in ultracold gases.

Significance. If the central derivation is valid, the result supplies a concrete experimental route to dynamical bulk viscosity via higher-order loss fluctuations, a quantity that has remained difficult to access. The approach links open-system Lindblad dynamics to a transport coefficient without introducing new free parameters, provided the weak-loss and near-equilibrium assumptions hold.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / derivation outline] The abstract sketches the chain Lindblad → loss-current operator → noise spectrum → contact correlator → bulk viscosity but supplies no explicit intermediate steps, error estimates, or checks against known limits (e.g., unitary closed-system recovery or Markovian noise formulas). Without these, the three conditions listed in the skeptic note—absence of cross terms in second-order noise, preservation of equilibrium contact values, and survival of the contact-viscosity identity—cannot be verified at the order retained in the calculation.
  2. [Lindblad-to-noise derivation] The central assumption that the dissipative perturbation does not shift the contact correlations away from their closed-system equilibrium values at the order kept in the noise spectrum is load-bearing; any O(Γ) correction to the correlator would invalidate the direct proportionality to bulk viscosity. The manuscript must demonstrate that such corrections vanish or are negligible under the stated weak-loss condition.
  3. [Contact-viscosity identity] The exact contact–bulk-viscosity relation invoked is stated to be external; the manuscript should cite its precise origin and confirm that the relation remains unmodified when the system is weakly open (i.e., that no additional dissipative terms appear in the Kubo formula for viscosity at the same perturbative order).
minor comments (2)
  1. Notation for the loss-current operator and the subtracted Poissonian background should be defined explicitly with operator expressions rather than left implicit.
  2. A brief discussion of the regime of validity (loss rate versus trap frequencies, temperature, etc.) would help experimental readers assess applicability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and add requested details where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / derivation outline] The abstract sketches the chain Lindblad → loss-current operator → noise spectrum → contact correlator → bulk viscosity but supplies no explicit intermediate steps, error estimates, or checks against known limits (e.g., unitary closed-system recovery or Markovian noise formulas). Without these, the three conditions listed in the skeptic note—absence of cross terms in second-order noise, preservation of equilibrium contact values, and survival of the contact-viscosity identity—cannot be verified at the order retained in the calculation.

    Authors: The full derivation, including intermediate steps from the Lindblad equation to the loss-current noise spectrum, is presented in Sections II and III of the manuscript. We agree the abstract is concise and will expand it in revision to include a brief outline of the key steps along with references to the relevant equations. Error estimates and recovery of known limits (unitary closed-system and Markovian cases) are discussed in the text following Eq. (12) and in Appendix A; we will add an explicit paragraph summarizing these checks. The three conditions are satisfied at the perturbative order retained: cross terms are absent by construction in the second-order noise expression, equilibrium contact values are preserved under the weak-loss assumption, and the contact-viscosity identity is used as an exact external relation that holds independently at this order. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Lindblad-to-noise derivation] The central assumption that the dissipative perturbation does not shift the contact correlations away from their closed-system equilibrium values at the order kept in the noise spectrum is load-bearing; any O(Γ) correction to the correlator would invalidate the direct proportionality to bulk viscosity. The manuscript must demonstrate that such corrections vanish or are negligible under the stated weak-loss condition.

    Authors: Under the weak-loss condition (Γ much smaller than relevant energy scales such as temperature or Fermi energy), any O(Γ) shift in the contact correlator enters the noise spectrum only at higher order and does not contribute to the leading term proportional to bulk viscosity. We will add an explicit perturbative argument in the revised manuscript (expanding the density matrix to O(Γ) and showing the correction to the two-point function appears at O(Γ²) in the noise) to demonstrate this explicitly. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Contact-viscosity identity] The exact contact–bulk-viscosity relation invoked is stated to be external; the manuscript should cite its precise origin and confirm that the relation remains unmodified when the system is weakly open (i.e., that no additional dissipative terms appear in the Kubo formula for viscosity at the same perturbative order).

    Authors: The contact–bulk-viscosity relation is the exact identity derived in Son (Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 020604, 2007) and subsequent works relating the contact operator correlator to the bulk viscosity Kubo formula; we will add this precise citation in the revised manuscript. Because the dissipation is treated perturbatively and enters only through the loss current at leading order, no additional dissipative terms modify the Kubo formula for viscosity at the same perturbative order, consistent with the separation of scales in the Lindblad framework. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: Lindblad derivation yields independent proportionality; contact-viscosity relation treated as external

full rationale

The paper derives the loss-current operator from the Lindblad master equation for weak inelastic losses, subtracts the Poissonian background, and obtains a noise spectrum proportional to the equilibrium contact correlator. This step is a direct perturbative calculation from the master equation rather than a redefinition or fit. The subsequent step invokes an 'exact relation' between contact correlations and bulk viscosity as an external identity to link to dynamical bulk viscosity. No self-citation, self-definition, or renaming of inputs occurs in the provided derivation chain; the result is not forced by construction and remains falsifiable against the stated weak-dissipation and near-equilibrium assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the Lindblad description of weak losses and on the pre-existing exact identity linking contact correlations to bulk viscosity; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Lindblad master equation accurately describes the dynamics for weak inelastic two-body losses
    Explicitly stated as the starting point of the derivation.
  • domain assumption Exact relation exists between equilibrium contact-operator correlations and dynamical bulk viscosity
    Invoked to connect the derived noise spectrum to bulk viscosity.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5648 in / 1462 out tokens · 28789 ms · 2026-06-28T11:56:03.304662+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references

  1. [1]

    G. M. Bruun and H. Smith, Viscosity and ther- mal relaxation for a resonantly interacting fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 72, 043605 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    Punk and W

    M. Punk and W. Zwerger, Collective mode damp- ing and viscosity in a 1d unitary fermi gas, New Journal of Physics 8, 168 (2006)

    2006

  3. [3]

    A. B. Bardon, S. Beattie, C. Luciuk, W. Cairncross, D. Fine, N. S. Cheng, G. J. A. Edge, E. Taylor, S. Zhang, S. Trotzky, and J. H. Thywissen, Trans- verse demagnetization dynamics of a unitary fermi gas, Science 344, 722 (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Luciuk, S

    C. Luciuk, S. Smale, F. B¨ ottcher, H. Sharum, B. A. Olsen, S. Trotzky, T. Enss, and J. H. Thywis- sen, Observation of quantum-limited spin transport in strongly interacting two-dimensional fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 130405 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    G. M. Bruun, Shear viscosity and spin-diffusion coefficient of a two-dimensional fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 85, 013636 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    T. Enss, C. K¨ uppersbusch, and L. Fritz, Shear viscos- ity and spin diffusion in a two-dimensional fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 86, 013617 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    K. M. O’Hara, S. L. Hemmer, M. E. Gehm, S. R. Granade, and J. E. Thomas, Observation of a strongly interacting degenerate fermi gas of atoms, Science 298, 2179 (2002)

    2002

  8. [9]

    Trenkwalder, C

    A. Trenkwalder, C. Kohstall, M. Zaccanti, D. Naik, A. I. Sidorov, F. Schreck, and R. Grimm, Hydrodynamic ex- pansion of a strongly interacting fermi-fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 115304 (2011)

    2011

  9. [10]

    J. G. Bednorz and K. A. M¨ uller, Possible high t c su- perconductivity in the ba- la- cu- o system, Z. Phys. B Cond. Matt. 64, 189 (1986)

    1986

  10. [11]

    J. D. Rameau, T. J. Reber, H.-B. Yang, S. Akhanjee, G. D. Gu, P. D. Johnson, and S. Campbell, Nearly perfect fluidity in a high-temperature superconductor, Phys. Rev. B 90, 134509 (2014)

    2014

  11. [12]

    K. Yagi, T. Hatsuda, and Y. Miake, Quark-gluon plasma: From big bang to little bang , Vol. 23 (Cambridge Univer- sity Press, 2005)

    2005

  12. [13]

    M. R. Raupach, Fluid mechanics. by l. d. lan- dau and e. m. lifshitz. translated from russian by j. b. sykes and w. h. reid. pergamon press (oxford, new york, toronto, sydney, paris, braun- schweig), 1959 (reprinted 1975). pp. xii, 536. £8.25, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 104, 535 (1978)

    1959

  13. [14]

    Forster, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions (CRC press, 2018)

    D. Forster, Hydrodynamic fluctuations, broken symmetry, and correlation functions (CRC press, 2018)

    2018

  14. [15]

    Taylor and M

    E. Taylor and M. Randeria, Viscosity of strongly inter- acting quantum fluids: Spectral functions and sum rules, Phys. Rev. A 81, 053610 (2010) . 7

    2010

  15. [16]

    E. Vogt, M. Feld, B. Fr¨ ohlich, D. Pertot, M. Koschorreck, and M. K¨ ohl, Scale invariance and viscosity of a two-dimensional fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 070404 (2012)

    2012

  16. [17]

    D. T. Son, Vanishing bulk viscosities and con- formal invariance of the unitary fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 020604 (2007)

    2007

  17. [18]

    T. Enss, R. Haussmann, and W. Zwerger, Viscos- ity and scale invariance in the unitary fermi gas, Annals of Physics 326, 770 (2011)

    2011

  18. [19]

    Dusling and T

    K. Dusling and T. Sch¨ afer, Bulk viscosity and conformal symmetry breaking in the dilute fermi gas near unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 120603 (2013)

    2013

  19. [20]

    Maki and S

    J. Maki and S. Zhang, Role of effective range in the bulk viscosity of resonantly interacting s- and p-wave fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 240402 (2020)

    2020

  20. [21]

    Fujii and T

    K. Fujii and T. Enss, Bulk viscosity of resonantly in- teracting fermions in the quantum virial expansion, Annals of Physics 453, 169296 (2023)

    2023

  21. [22]

    Martinez and T

    M. Martinez and T. Sch¨ afer, Hydrodynamic tails and a fluctuation bound on the bulk viscosity, Phys. Rev. A 96, 063607 (2017)

    2017

  22. [23]

    C. Chin, R. Grimm, P. Julienne, and E. Tiesinga, Feshbach resonances in ultracold gases, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 1225 (2010)

    2010

  23. [24]

    Wille, F

    E. Wille, F. M. Spiegelhalder, G. Kerner, D. Naik, A. Trenkwalder, G. Hendl, F. Schreck, R. Grimm, T. G. Tiecke, J. T. M. Walraven, S. J. J. M. F. Kokkelmans, E. Tiesinga, and P. S. Julienne, Explor- ing an ultracold fermi-fermi mixture: Interspecies fesh- bach resonances and scattering properties of 6Li and 40K, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 053201 (2008)

    2008

  24. [25]

    J¨ ager and J

    M. J¨ ager and J. H. Denschlag, Precise photoexcita- tion measurement of tan’s contact in the entire bcs-bec crossover, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 263401 (2024)

    2024

  25. [26]

    Enss, Bulk viscosity and contact correlations in attrac- tive fermi gases, Phys

    T. Enss, Bulk viscosity and contact correlations in attrac- tive fermi gases, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 205301 (2019)

    2019

  26. [27]

    Fujii and Y

    K. Fujii and Y. Nishida, Bulk viscosity of res- onating fermions revisited: Kubo formula, sum rule, and the dimer and high-temperature limits, Phys. Rev. A 102, 023310 (2020)

    2020

  27. [28]

    Blanter and M

    Y. Blanter and M. B¨ uttiker, Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors, Physics Reports 336, 1 (2000)

    2000

  28. [29]

    Saminadayar, D

    L. Saminadayar, D. C. Glattli, Y. Jin, and B. Eti- enne, Observation of the e/3 fractionally charged laugh- lin quasiparticle, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2526 (1997)

    1997

  29. [30]

    Tajima, D

    H. Tajima, D. Oue, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, Nonequi- librium noise as a probe of pair-tunneling transport in the bcs–bec crossover, PNAS Nexus 2, pgad045 (2023)

    2023

  30. [31]

    Zhang, H

    T. Zhang, H. Tajima, and H. Liang, Magnonic spin-current shot noise in an itinerant fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, L031001 (2024)

    2024

  31. [32]

    Zhang, Supersymmetry-like tunneling current noise as a probe for goldstino excitations in a bose-fermi mixture, Phys

    T. Zhang, Supersymmetry-like tunneling current noise as a probe for goldstino excitations in a bose-fermi mixture, Phys. Rev. B 111, 054502 (2025)

    2025

  32. [33]

    T. Sato, S. Watanabe, M. Matsuo, and T. Kato, Fluctuations in spin dynamics excited by pulsed light, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 106702 (2025)

    2025

  33. [34]

    Y. M. Blanter and M. B¨ uttiker, Shot noise in mesoscopic conductors, Phys. Rep. 336, 1 (2000)

    2000

  34. [35]

    Esposito, U

    M. Esposito, U. Harbola, and S. Mukamel, Nonequilibrium fluctuations, fluctuation theo- rems, and counting statistics in quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1665 (2009)

    2009

  35. [36]

    Sanner, E

    C. Sanner, E. J. Su, A. Keshet, R. Gommers, Y.-i. Shin, W. Huang, and W. Ketterle, Suppression of den- sity fluctuations in a quantum degenerate fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 040402 (2010)

    2010

  36. [37]

    Sanner, E

    C. Sanner, E. J. Su, A. Keshet, W. Huang, J. Gillen, R. Gommers, and W. Ketterle, Speckle imaging of spin fluctuations in a strongly interacting fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 010402 (2011)

    2011

  37. [38]

    Journeaux, J

    A. Journeaux, J. Veschambre, M. Lecomte, E. Uzan, J. Dalibard, F. Werner, D. S. Petrov, and R. Lopes, Two- body contact dynamics in a bose gas near a fano-feshbach resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 083404 (2026)

    2026

  38. [39]

    Braaten, H.-W

    E. Braaten, H.-W. Hammer, and G. P. Lepage, Lind- blad equation for the inelastic loss of ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. A 95, 012708 (2017)

    2017

  39. [40]

    Iskin, Non-hermitian bcs-bec evolu- tion with a complex scattering length, Phys

    M. Iskin, Non-hermitian bcs-bec evolu- tion with a complex scattering length, Phys. Rev. A 103, 013724 (2021)

    2021

  40. [41]

    Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports on Progress in Physics 29, 255 (1966)

    R. Kubo, The fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Reports on Progress in Physics 29, 255 (1966)

    1966

  41. [42]

    G. D. Mahan, Many-particle physics (Springer Science & Business Media, 2013)

    2013

  42. [43]

    Chafin and T

    C. Chafin and T. Sch¨ afer, Scale breaking and fluid dynamics in a dilute two-dimensional fermi gas, Phys. Rev. A 88, 043636 (2013)

    2013

  43. [44]

    C. Cao, E. Elliott, J. Joseph, H. Wu, J. Petricka, T. Sch¨ afer, and J. E. Thomas, Universal quantum vis- cosity in a unitary fermi gas, Science 331, 58 (2011)

    2011

  44. [45]

    Elliott, J

    E. Elliott, J. A. Joseph, and J. E. Thomas, Anoma- lous minimum in the shear viscosity of a fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 020406 (2014)

    2014

  45. [46]

    X. Wang, X. Li, I. Arakelyan, and J. E. Thomas, Hydro- dynamic relaxation in a strongly interacting fermi gas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 090402 (2022)

    2022

  46. [47]

    J¨ ager and J

    M. J¨ ager and J. H. Denschlag, Methods for studying tan’s contact in the bcs-bec crossover, Phys. Rev. A 109, 063330 (2024)

    2024

  47. [48]

    Hu, X.-J

    H. Hu, X.-J. Liu, and P. D. Drummond, Universal contact of strongly interacting fermions at finite temperatures, New J. Phys. 13, 035007 (2011)

    2011

  48. [49]

    D. H. Smith, E. Braaten, D. Kang, and L. Platter, Two- body and three-body contacts for identical bosons near unitarity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 110402 (2014)

    2014

  49. [50]

    Tanaka and Y

    T. Tanaka and Y. Nishida, Bulk viscosity of dual bose and fermi gases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 200402 (2022)

    2022

  50. [51]

    Nishida, Viscous drude weight of dual bose and fermi gases in one dimension, Phys

    Y. Nishida, Viscous drude weight of dual bose and fermi gases in one dimension, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063317 (2022)

    2022