Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 76 references

Exact Charge, Current, and Velocity Fields of Interacting Korteweg-de Vries Solitons

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-28 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The dynamics of N interacting KdV solitons reduce to N independent continuity equations with interactions encoded only in initial correlations.

desk verdict The paper constructs per-soliton charge, current, and velocity fields from the IST that satisfy independent continuity equations even during overlap, then recovers known hydrodynamic limits. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.02043 v1 pith:H2E64TDI submitted 2026-06-01 nlin.PS

Thibault Bonnemain , François Copie , Pierre Suret , Stéphane Randoux This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.PS
keywords KdVsolitonsinversescatteringtransformcontinuityequationssolitoninteractionsgasesgeneralizedhydrodynamicswave-particlecharacter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs exact space-time fields of charge, current, and velocity for KdV solitons directly from the inverse scattering transform. These fields remain individually attributable to each soliton at all times, including during overlap. This construction yields N independent continuity equations whose right-hand sides contain no explicit interaction terms after the initial time. Coarse-graining the same fields recovers the known kinetic theory of soliton gases and generalized hydrodynamics as limiting cases.

What carries the argument

Exact charge, current, and velocity fields derived from the inverse scattering transform of the KdV equation, each remaining attributable to one soliton.

What would settle it

A numerical or experimental check showing that the integrated charge belonging to one soliton changes during an interaction in a manner that cannot be reproduced by propagating the initial correlations alone.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By constructing exact fields of charge, current, and velocity from the inverse scattering transform, the dynamics of N interacting KdV solitons can be expressed as N independent continuity equations in which interactions are encoded solely in the initial correlations that are then propagated forward in time.

Load-bearing premise

The inverse scattering transform supplies well-defined, non-negative or conserved charge, current, and velocity fields that remain individually attributable to each soliton even during strong overlap.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Individual soliton trajectories and deformations become quantifiable at all times, not only asymptotically.
  • Effective velocities appear automatically upon spatial coarse-graining of the microscopic fields.
  • The kinetic theory of soliton gases and generalized hydrodynamics arise as scaling limits of the same microscopic continuity equations.
  • A direct bridge is established between the wave-based IST formalism and particle-like emergent descriptions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same construction may supply a microscopic starting point for hydrodynamic descriptions in other integrable soliton systems.
  • Laboratory measurements of local velocity fields in shallow-water soliton collisions could directly test whether the continuity equations hold through the overlap region.
  • Defining soliton identity via the IST fields rather than peak position removes the ambiguity that appears when solitons pass through each other.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops exact space-time fields of charge, current, and velocity for individual KdV solitons by means of the inverse scattering transform. It asserts that the dynamics of N interacting solitons are governed by N independent continuity equations in which interactions appear only through initial correlations that are then propagated forward; coarse-graining is claimed to recover the kinetic theory of soliton gases and generalized hydrodynamics as scaling limits.

Significance. If the per-soliton fields can be shown to remain individually conserved and attributable during overlap, the construction would supply a microscopic, field-theoretic bridge between the IST and both particle-like trajectories and emergent hydrodynamic descriptions, with the advantage of being derived directly from the scattering data rather than postulated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and the section presenting the field definitions] The central claim that N independent continuity equations hold requires an explicit construction of the per-soliton densities ρ_i(x,t), currents j_i(x,t) and velocities v_i(x,t) from the IST that remain non-negative and individually conserved when solitons overlap. The abstract states that these fields are “derived from the IST,” but without the explicit formulas (e.g., the contour integrals or norming-constant decompositions used to split the reconstruction) and a direct verification that ∂_t ρ_i + ∂_x j_i = 0 holds without cross terms, the independence asserted in the main result cannot be checked.
  2. [Two-soliton example and verification of continuity equations] For the two-soliton case, the manuscript should exhibit the explicit time-dependent fields during the interaction interval and confirm that each soliton’s continuity equation is satisfied separately; any residual cross term would falsify the statement that “interactions are encoded in initial correlations that are subsequently propagated.”
minor comments (2)
  1. [Notation and definitions] Notation for the per-soliton quantities should be introduced with a clear index i and distinguished from the total fields u(x,t), ρ(x,t), etc.
  2. [Hydrodynamic limit paragraph] The hydrodynamic scaling limit is stated to recover GHD; a brief remark on the precise coarse-graining procedure (e.g., spatial averaging scale relative to soliton width) would clarify the connection.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The points raised concern the explicitness of the field constructions and verifications, which we address below by agreeing to expand the relevant sections.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and the section presenting the field definitions] The central claim that N independent continuity equations hold requires an explicit construction of the per-soliton densities ρ_i(x,t), currents j_i(x,t) and velocities v_i(x,t) from the IST that remain non-negative and individually conserved when solitons overlap. The abstract states that these fields are “derived from the IST,” but without the explicit formulas (e.g., the contour integrals or norming-constant decompositions used to split the reconstruction) and a direct verification that ∂_t ρ_i + ∂_x j_i = 0 holds without cross terms, the independence asserted in the main result cannot be checked.

    Authors: We agree that greater explicitness is needed for verification. The manuscript constructs the per-soliton fields via decomposition of the norming constants in the IST reconstruction (Section 3), with each ρ_i, j_i, v_i obtained from individual discrete-spectrum contributions. However, the presentation is concise and does not include the full contour-integral expressions or the term-by-term differentiation showing absence of cross terms. In revision we will add these explicit formulas and the direct verification that each continuity equation holds independently. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Two-soliton example and verification of continuity equations] For the two-soliton case, the manuscript should exhibit the explicit time-dependent fields during the interaction interval and confirm that each soliton’s continuity equation is satisfied separately; any residual cross term would falsify the statement that “interactions are encoded in initial correlations that are subsequently propagated.”

    Authors: We will include in the revision an expanded two-soliton example (new subsection in Section 4) displaying the explicit time-dependent ρ_i(x,t), j_i(x,t) during overlap, obtained from the two-pole IST solution. We will confirm analytically that each continuity equation holds separately with no cross terms, consistent with interactions being carried solely by initial correlations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; derivation rests on standard IST without self-referential reduction

full rationale

The central claim—that N solitons obey independent continuity equations with interactions encoded only in initial correlations—is presented as following directly from the inverse scattering transform applied to the KdV equation. IST is an external, well-established mathematical framework (not defined or fitted within this paper), and the abstract gives no indication that per-soliton fields are obtained by ansatz, renaming, or self-citation chains. No equations or steps are shown that reduce the claimed continuity equations to the inputs by construction. The connection to hydrodynamic limits is described as an emergent scaling limit rather than a fitted prediction. This satisfies the criteria for a self-contained derivation against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the inverse scattering transform to the KdV equation and on the existence of a mapping from scattering data to continuous microscopic fields; no free parameters or new postulated entities are mentioned.

assumptions (1)
  • standard math The inverse scattering transform applies to the KdV equation and yields exact solutions whose scattering data determine the wave field at all times.
    Invoked throughout the abstract as the source of the exact fields and continuity equations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Exact Charge, Current, and Velocity Fields of Interacting Korteweg-de Vries Solitons." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H2E64TDI

@misc{pith2026260602043,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Exact Charge, Current, and Velocity Fields of Interacting Korteweg-de Vries Solitons},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H2E64TDI}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.02043}
}
abstract

Solitons in integrable systems exhibit a dual wave-particle character, yet their identification as individual objects becomes ambiguous during interactions, where they deform and delocalize. We develop a microscopic, field-based description that resolves this issue by introducing exact space-time fields of charge, current, and velocity derived from the inverse scattering transform (IST) of the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV) equation. This framework enables individual KdV solitons to be tracked throughout interactions, providing a quantitative description of their trajectories and deformation beyond the asymptotic regime. We show that the dynamics of $N$ interacting solitons can be formulated in terms of $N$ independent continuity equations, in which interactions are encoded in initial correlations that are subsequently propagated. From this microscopic viewpoint, effective velocities and hydrodynamic behavior emerge upon coarse graining, recovering kinetic theory of soliton gases and Generalized Hydrodynamics as scaling limits. Our results establish a direct connection between the wave-based IST formalism and particle-like emergent descriptions, offering a unified framework for soliton dynamics across scales.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02043 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Numerical simulation showing the interaction between 2 (upper panel) and 8 (lower panel) KdV solitons. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Numerical simulation showing the interaction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Characteristic trajectory (blue curve) starting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characteristic trajectory of a soliton ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    interacting KdV equations

    In the lower panel, ηm = [1.1,0.7,0.6,0.5,0.4,0.3,0.2,0.1]. persive, integrable partial differential equation fea- turing solitons [47–50]. The KdV initial value prob- lem is commonly addressed via the IST, by solving the auxiliarylinearproblem ψxx + (u+λ)ψ= 0, ψ t +ψ xxx −3(u+λ)ψ x = 0. (2) If the KdV wavefielduis purely solitonic, it can be reconstructe...

  2. [2]

    project. We acknowledge the support of the CDP C2EMPI, as well as the French State under the France-2030 programme, the University of Lille, the Initiative of Excellence of the University of Lille, the European Metropolis of Lille for their funding and support of the R-CDP-24-004-C2EMPI project. The authors thank Benjamin Doyon, Gennady El and Tamara Grav...

  3. [3]

    Bloch oscil- lations of a soliton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid,

    F. Rabec, G. Chauveau, G. Brochier, S. Nascim- bene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, “Bloch oscil- lations of a soliton in a one-dimensional quantum fluid,” Nature Physics, vol. 21, p. 1541, aug 2025

    2025

  4. [4]

    Observation of jones- roberts solitons in a paraxial quantum fluid of light,

    M. Baker-Rasooli, T. Aladjidi, N. A. Krause, A. S. Bradley, and Q. Glorieux, “Observation of jones- roberts solitons in a paraxial quantum fluid of light,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 134, p. 233401, Jun 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Nonreciprocal breathing solitons,

    J. Veenstra, O. Gamayun, M. Brandenbourger, F. van Gorp, H. Terwisscha-Dekker, J.-S. Caux, and C. Coulais, “Nonreciprocal breathing solitons,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 15, p. 031045, Aug 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Observation of lump solitons,

    L. Dieli, D. Pierangeli, F. Baronio, S. Trillo, and C. Conti, “Observation of lump solitons,”Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 136, p. 053804, Feb 2026

    2026

  7. [7]

    Collisions of three-component vector solitons in bose-einstein condensates,

    S. Lannig, C.-M. Schmied, M. Pr¨ ufer, P. Kunkel, R. Strohmaier, H. Strobel, T. Gasenzer, P. G. 6 Kevrekidis, and M. K. Oberthaler, “Collisions of three-component vector solitons in bose-einstein condensates,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, p. 170401, Oct 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Exper- imental observation of periodic korteweg-de vries solitons along a torus of fluid,

    F. Novkoski, C.-T. Pham, and E. Falcon, “Exper- imental observation of periodic korteweg-de vries solitons along a torus of fluid,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 139, p. 53003, sep 2022

    2022

Show all 76 references
  1. [9]

    Space–time observation of the dynamics of soliton collisions in a recirculating optical fiber loop,

    F. Copie, P. Suret, and S. Randoux, “Space–time observation of the dynamics of soliton collisions in a recirculating optical fiber loop,” Optics Communications, vol. 545, p. 129647, 2023

    2023

  2. [10]

    On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves,

    T. Heimburg, A. D. Jackson, and G. A. Baym, “On soliton propagation in biomembranes and nerves,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 102, no. 28, pp. 9790–9795, 2005

    2005

  3. [11]

    Interaction of

    N. J. Zabusky and M. D. Kruskal, “Interaction of ”solitons” in a collisionless plasma and the recur- rence of initial states,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 240–243, Aug 1965

    1965

  4. [12]

    Method for solving the korteweg- devries equation,

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, “Method for solving the korteweg- devries equation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 19, pp. 1095–1097, Nov 1967

    1967

  5. [13]

    Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media,

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, “Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media,” Sov. Phys.–JETP, vol. 34, pp. 62–69, 1972

    1972

  6. [14]

    S. P. Novikov, S. V. Manakov, L. P. Pitaevskii, and V. E. Zakharov, Theory of solitons: the inverse scattering method. Springer Science Business Media, 1984

    1984

  7. [15]

    Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-integrable Systems

    J. Yang, Nonlinear Waves in Integrable and Non-integrable Systems. Mathematical Modeling and Computation, Society for Industrial and Ap- plied Mathematics, 2010

    2010

  8. [16]

    Nonlinear-evolution equations of physical sig- nificance,

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, and H. Se- gur, “Nonlinear-evolution equations of physical sig- nificance,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 31, pp. 125–127, Jul 1973

    1973

  9. [17]

    A. C. Newell, Solitons in mathematics and physics. SIAM, 1985

    1985

  10. [18]

    The korteweg–devries equation: A survey of results,

    R. M. Miura, “The korteweg–devries equation: A survey of results,” SIAM Review, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 412–459, 1976

    1976

  11. [19]

    P. G. Drazin and R. S. Johnson, Solitons: an introduction, vol. 2. Cambridge university press, 1989

    1989

  12. [20]

    Solitons in interaction,

    B. Fuchssteiner, “Solitons in interaction,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 1022–1050, 1987

    1987

  13. [21]

    Interacting korteweg-de vries equa- tions and attractive soliton interaction,

    T. Yoneyama, “Interacting korteweg-de vries equa- tions and attractive soliton interaction,” Progress of theoretical physics, vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 1081–1088, 1984

    1984

  14. [22]

    Soliton collisions and ghost parti- cle radiation,

    H. D. Nguyˆ e˜ n, “Soliton collisions and ghost parti- cle radiation,” Journal of nonlinear mathematical physics, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 180–198, 2004

    2004

  15. [23]

    On decom- positions of the kdv 2-soliton,

    N. Benes, A. Kasman, and K. Young, “On decom- positions of the kdv 2-soliton,” Journal of nonlinear science, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 179–200, 2006

    2006

  16. [24]

    Asymptotic scattering relation for the toda lattice,

    A. Aggarwal, “Asymptotic scattering relation for the toda lattice,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.08018, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    Effective velocities in the toda lattice,

    A. Aggarwal, “Effective velocities in the toda lattice,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, p. e70046, 2025

    2025

  18. [26]

    Solitonic dispersive hydrody- namics: Theory and observation,

    M. D. Maiden, D. V. Anderson, N. A. Franco, G. A. El, and M. A. Hoefer, “Solitonic dispersive hydrody- namics: Theory and observation,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 120, p. 144101, Apr 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Dispersive shock waves and modulation theory,

    G. El and M. Hoefer, “Dispersive shock waves and modulation theory,” Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 333, pp. 11–65, 2016. Dispersive Hydrodynamics

    2016

  20. [28]

    Kinetic equation for solitons,

    V. Zakharov, “Kinetic equation for solitons,” Sov. Phys. JETP, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 538–540, 1971

    1971

  21. [29]

    Kinetic equation for a dense soliton gas,

    G. A. El and A. M. Kamchatnov, “Kinetic equation for a dense soliton gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 95, p. 204101, Nov 2005

    2005

  22. [30]

    Experimental evidence of a hy- drodynamic soliton gas,

    I. Redor, E. Barth´ elemy, H. Michallet, M. Onorato, and N. Mordant, “Experimental evidence of a hy- drodynamic soliton gas,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, p. 214502, May 2019

    2019

  23. [31]

    Nonlinear spectral synthesis of soliton gas in deep- water surface gravity waves,

    P. Suret, A. Tikan, F. Bonnefoy, F. m. c. Copie, G. Ducrozet, A. Gelash, G. Prabhudesai, G. Michel, A. Cazaubiel, E. Falcon, G. El, and S. Randoux, “Nonlinear spectral synthesis of soliton gas in deep- water surface gravity waves,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, p. 264101, Dec 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Interaction of soliton gases in deep-water surface gravity waves,

    L. Fache, F. Bonnefoy, G. Ducrozet, F. Copie, F. Novkoski, G. Ricard, G. Roberti, E. Falcon, P. Suret, G. El, and S. Randoux, “Interaction of soliton gases in deep-water surface gravity waves,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 109, p. 034207, Mar 2024

    2024

  25. [33]

    The thermodynamic limit of the whitham equations,

    G. El, “The thermodynamic limit of the whitham equations,” Physics Letters A, vol. 311, no. 4, pp. 374 – 383, 2003

    2003

  26. [34]

    Soliton gas in integrable dispersive hydrodynamics,

    G. A. El, “Soliton gas in integrable dispersive hydrodynamics,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2021, no. 11, p. 114001, 2021

    2021

  27. [35]

    Spectral theory of soliton and breather gases for the focusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation,

    G. El and A. Tovbis, “Spectral theory of soliton and breather gases for the focusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 101, p. 052207, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Transport in out-of-equilibrium x x z chains: Ex- act profiles of charges and currents,

    B. Bertini, M. Collura, J. De Nardis, and M. Fagotti, “Transport in out-of-equilibrium x x z chains: Ex- act profiles of charges and currents,”Physical review letters, vol. 117, no. 20, p. 207201, 2016

    2016

  29. [37]

    Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium,

    O. A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon, and T. Yoshimura, “Emergent hydrodynamics in integrable quantum systems out of equilibrium,” Physical Review X, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 041065, 2016

    2016

  30. [38]

    Lecture notes on generalised hydrody- namics,

    B. Doyon, “Lecture notes on generalised hydrody- namics,” SciPost Physics Lecture Notes, p. 018, 2020

    2020

  31. [39]

    Spohn, Hydrodynamic scales of integrable many-body systems

    H. Spohn, Hydrodynamic scales of integrable many-body systems. World Scientific, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    Generalized hydrodynamics of the kdv soliton gas,

    T. Bonnemain, B. Doyon, and G. El, “Generalized hydrodynamics of the kdv soliton gas,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 55, no. 37, p. 374004, 2022

    2022

  33. [41]

    Gen- eralized hydrodynamics of the attractive non- linear schr¨ odinger equation,

    R. Koch, J.-S. Caux, and A. Bastianello, “Gen- eralized hydrodynamics of the attractive non- linear schr¨ odinger equation,” Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, vol. 55, no. 13, p. 134001, 2022. 7

    2022

  34. [42]

    Soliton gas: Theory, nu- merics, and experiments,

    P. Suret, S. Randoux, A. Gelash, D. Agafontsev, B. Doyon, and G. El, “Soliton gas: Theory, nu- merics, and experiments,” Phys. Rev. E, vol. 109, p. 061001, Jun 2024

    2024

  35. [43]

    Generalized hydrodynamics on an atom chip,

    M. Schemmer, I. Bouchoule, B. Doyon, and J. Dubail, “Generalized hydrodynamics on an atom chip,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 122, p. 090601, Mar 2019

    2019

  36. [44]

    Experimental observation of ballistic correla- tions in integrable turbulence,

    E. Charnay, A. Escoubet, F. Copie, S. Ran- doux, T. Bonnemain, A. Bastianello, and P. Suret, “Experimental observation of ballistic correla- tions in integrable turbulence,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21085, 2026

    2026

  37. [45]

    Dissipation-driven emergence of a soliton condensate in a nonlinear electrical transmission line,

    L. Fache, H. Damart, F. Copie, T. Bonnemain, T. Congy, G. Roberti, P. Suret, G. El, and S. Ran- doux, “Dissipation-driven emergence of a soliton condensate in a nonlinear electrical transmission line,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 134, p. 147201, Apr 2025

    2025

  38. [46]

    Ob- servation of magnon bound states in the long-range, anisotropic heisenberg model,

    F. Kranzl, S. Birnkammer, M. K. Joshi, A. Bas- tianello, R. Blatt, M. Knap, and C. F. Roos, “Ob- servation of magnon bound states in the long-range, anisotropic heisenberg model,” Physical Review X, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 031017, 2023

    2023

  39. [47]

    Bound state soliton gas dynamics underlying the spontaneous modulational instability,

    A. Gelash, D. Agafontsev, V. Zakharov, G. El, S. Randoux, and P. Suret, “Bound state soliton gas dynamics underlying the spontaneous modulational instability,” Physical review letters, vol. 123, no. 23, p. 234102, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    Exactly solvable model of wave-mean field interaction in integrable turbulence,

    T. Congy, G. El, and M. Hoefer, “Exactly solvable model of wave-mean field interaction in integrable turbulence,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 136, no. 14, p. 147201, 2026

    2026

  41. [49]

    M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur, Solitons and the inverse scattering transform. SIAM, 1981

    1981

  42. [50]

    Novikov, S

    S. Novikov, S. Manakov, L. Pitaevskii, and V. E. Zakharov, Theory of solitons: the inverse scattering method. Springer Science & Business Media, 1984

    1984

  43. [51]

    Calogero, N

    F. Calogero, N. Ercolani, H. Flaschka, V. Marchenko, A. Mikhailov, A. Newell, E. Schul- man, A. Shabat, E. Siggia, V. Sokolov, et al., What is integrability? Springer Science & Business Media, 2012

    2012

  44. [52]

    Remoissenet, Waves called solitons: concepts and experiments

    M. Remoissenet, Waves called solitons: concepts and experiments. Springer Science & Business Me- dia, 2013

    2013

  45. [53]

    Korteweg-devries equation and generalizations. vi. methods for exact solution,

    C. S. Gardner, J. M. Greene, M. D. Kruskal, and R. M. Miura, “Korteweg-devries equation and generalizations. vi. methods for exact solution,” Communications on pure and applied mathematics, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 97–133, 1974

    1974

  46. [54]

    Diffusive hydrodynamics from long-range correla- tions,

    F. H¨ ubner, L. Biagetti, J. De Nardis, and B. Doyon, “Diffusive hydrodynamics from long-range correla- tions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 134, no. 18, p. 187101, 2025

    2025

  47. [55]

    Diffusive hydrodynamics of hard rods from micro- scopics,

    F. H¨ ubner, L. Biagetti, J. De Nardis, and B. Doyon, “Diffusive hydrodynamics of hard rods from micro- scopics,” SciPost Physics Core, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 010, 2026

    2026

  48. [56]

    Dif- fusion from convection,

    M. Medenjak, J. De Nardis, and T. Yoshimura, “Dif- fusion from convection,” SciPost Physics, vol. 9, no. 5, p. 075, 2020

    2020

  49. [57]

    Sturm oscillation and comparison theo- rems,

    B. Simon, “Sturm oscillation and comparison theo- rems,” in Sturm-Liouville Theory: Past and Present, pp. 29–43, Springer, 2005

    2005

  50. [58]

    The rotation number for almost periodic potentials,

    R. Johnson and J. Moser, “The rotation number for almost periodic potentials,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 403–438, 1982

    1982

  51. [59]

    Supersymmetric quantum mechan- ics and its applications,

    C. Sukumar, “Supersymmetric quantum mechan- ics and its applications,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 744, pp. 166–235, American Insti- tute of Physics, 2004

    2004

  52. [60]

    C. Gu, H. Hu, and Z. Zhou, Darboux transformations in integrable systems: theory and their applications to geometry. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

    2004

  53. [61]

    Reflectionless transmis- sion through dielectrics and scattering potentials,

    I. Kay and H. Moses, “Reflectionless transmis- sion through dielectrics and scattering potentials,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1503– 1508, 1956

    1956

  54. [62]

    Hirota, The direct method in soliton theory

    R. Hirota, The direct method in soliton theory. No. 155, Cambridge University Press, 2004

    2004

  55. [63]

    Courant and D

    R. Courant and D. Hilbert, Methods of mathematical physics, volume 2. John Wiley & Sons, 2024

    2024

  56. [64]

    Soliton gas in integrable dispersive hydrodynamics,

    G. A. El, “Soliton gas in integrable dispersive hydrodynamics,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, vol. 2021, p. 114001, nov 2021

    2021

  57. [65]

    Dis- persive hydrodynamics of soliton condensates for the korteweg–de vries equation,

    T. Congy, G. El, G. Roberti, and A. Tovbis, “Dis- persive hydrodynamics of soliton condensates for the korteweg–de vries equation,” Journal of Nonlinear Science, vol. 33, no. 6, p. 104, 2023

    2023

  58. [66]

    Statistics of extreme events in integrable turbulence,

    T. Congy, G. El, G. Roberti, A. Tovbis, S. Ran- doux, and P. Suret, “Statistics of extreme events in integrable turbulence,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 132, no. 20, p. 207201, 2024

    2024

  59. [67]

    Large deviations for weighted empirical measures arising in impor- tance sampling,

    H. Hult and P. Nyquist, “Large deviations for weighted empirical measures arising in impor- tance sampling,” Stochastic Processes and their Applications, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 138–170, 2016

    2016

  60. [68]

    The distribution and quantiles of functionals of weighted empirical distributions when observations have different dis- tributions,

    C. S. Withers and S. Nadarajah, “The distribution and quantiles of functionals of weighted empirical distributions when observations have different dis- tributions,” Statistics & probability letters, vol. 80, no. 13-14, pp. 1093–1102, 2010

    2010

  61. [69]

    Macro- scopic dynamics of incoherent soliton ensembles: Soliton gas kinetics and direct numerical modelling,

    F. Carbone, D. Dutykh, and G. A. El, “Macro- scopic dynamics of incoherent soliton ensembles: Soliton gas kinetics and direct numerical modelling,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 113, p. 30003, feb 2016

    2016

  62. [70]

    B. C. Hall, Quantum theory for mathematicians. Springer, 2013

    2013

  63. [71]

    Soliton versus the gas: Fredholm determinants, analysis, and the rapid oscillations behind the kinetic equation,

    M. Girotti, T. Grava, R. Jenkins, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, and A. Minakov, “Soliton versus the gas: Fredholm determinants, analysis, and the rapid oscillations behind the kinetic equation,” Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. 76, no. 11, pp. 3233–3299, 2023

    2023

  64. [72]

    Where solitons are in a kdv soliton gas,

    B. Doyon, “Where solitons are in a kdv soliton gas,” 2026

    2026

  65. [73]

    New classical integrable systems from generalized tt- deformations,

    B. Doyon, F. H¨ ubner, and T. Yoshimura, “New classical integrable systems from generalized tt- deformations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 132, no. 25, p. 251602, 2024

    2024

  66. [74]

    Gener- alised tt¯-deformations of classical free particles: B. doyon et al.,

    B. Doyon, F. H¨ ubner, and T. Yoshimura, “Gener- alised tt¯-deformations of classical free particles: B. doyon et al.,” in Annales Henri Poincar´ e, pp. 1–50, 8 Springer, 2026

    2026

  67. [75]

    splitting

    P. F. Byrd and M. D. Friedman,Handbook of elliptic integrals for engineers and physicists. Springer, 2013. END MA TTER Recovering the KdV scattering shift from the interaction of two solitons—An important fea- ture of soliton interactions is the scattering shift that remains a...

    2013

  68. [76]

    Al- though it seems difficult to find an explicit solution of Eq

    +y 1(0)−F(y 1(0)), (27) with the functionF(s) = η2 η1 atanh h η2 η1 tanh(s) i . Al- though it seems difficult to find an explicit solution of Eq. (27), it is possible to study its long time asymp- totics. Recallingη 1 > η 2, ast→ ±∞we have that (x1(t,¯x1)−4η 2 2t)→ ±∞such that...

Pith tools

Reviewed June 28, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.