The impact of sample insulation on estimating the heating power of magnetic nanoparticles by AC calorimetry

Bianca L. Hansen; Cathrine Frandsen; Lise G. Hanson; Mathias Zambach; Niels B. Christensen; Thomas Veile

arxiv: 2606.02103 · v1 · pith:5OSJVHCGnew · submitted 2026-06-01 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

The impact of sample insulation on estimating the heating power of magnetic nanoparticles by AC calorimetry

Lise G. Hanson , Bianca L. Hansen , Thomas Veile , Mathias Zambach , Niels B. Christensen , Cathrine Frandsen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 11:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph

keywords AC calorimetrymagnetic nanoparticlesheating powersample insulationcorrected slope methodmagnetic hyperthermia

0 comments

The pith

Temperature rise in sample insulation creates systematic errors in AC calorimetry heating power estimates when environment temperature is held fixed.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the effect of insulation on AC calorimetry measurements of heating power from magnetic nanoparticles. It shows that keeping the sample environment temperature fixed at its initial value during analysis allows the insulation's own temperature increase to produce systematic errors in the corrected slope method. The proposed fix is to replace the fixed reference with the measured local temperature difference between the sample and its immediate surroundings. This matters because heating power values are used to plan magnetic hyperthermia treatments, where even moderate bias can affect dose calculations.

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that temperature increase in the insulation leads to systematic errors when estimating the heating power by the corrected slope method if the temperature of the sample environment is kept fixed at its initial temperature in the data analysis. They propose that these errors are corrected by using a local temperature difference between the sample and the sample environment.

What carries the argument

The corrected slope method in AC calorimetry, where the key mechanism is the choice of reference temperature (fixed initial environment value versus local sample-environment difference) when insulation heats during the measurement.

If this is right

Heating power values obtained with the corrected slope method and fixed environment temperature will be biased when insulation is present.
Using the local temperature difference removes the identified systematic error in the analysis.
Accurate power estimates become available for hyperthermia applications once the local difference is adopted.
Past data sets that used fixed environment temperature may need reprocessing if insulation was used.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Similar reference-temperature choices may introduce comparable biases in other thermal measurement setups for nanoparticles.
Instrument designs could incorporate dedicated local sensors to make the corrected analysis automatic.
The result suggests checking whether insulation effects appear in steady-state or different-frequency calorimetry protocols.

Load-bearing premise

That insulation temperature rise is the dominant error source and that switching to a local temperature difference removes the bias without new unaccounted effects from sensor placement or altered heat flow paths.

What would settle it

Perform paired AC calorimetry runs on the same nanoparticle sample, once analyzing with fixed initial environment temperature and once with local difference, then compare both results to an independent heating power measurement obtained without insulation or by a different technique such as direct calorimetry.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.02103 by Bianca L. Hansen, Cathrine Frandsen, Lise G. Hanson, Mathias Zambach, Niels B. Christensen, Thomas Veile.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Sample temperature before, under, and after field application [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Illustration of the three sample environments. The black dots [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Data from the RADIOMAG project. All three laboratories used [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: a) Temperature measurements at different radial positions, r. The insulation starts at r > 5 mm. b) Slope curve measured in the center of the sample. The gray arrows indicate the estimated power losses at ∆T= 10 K and 20 K, assuming that PMNP is constant. The AC field amplitude was 7.2 kA/m and the frequency was 242 kHz. when the field is switched on. From [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_7.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: a shows Ts vs. t measured on the same sample under the same field conditions (4.8 kA/m, 405 kHz) in the three different sample environments ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Slope curves with subtraction of insulation temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Correct estimation of the heating power of magnetic nanoparticles is important for magnetic hyperthermia treatment. This work investigates the impact of sample insulation in AC calorimetry. We show that temperature increase in the insulation can lead to systematic errors when estimating the heating power by the corrected slope method. The errors arise if the temperature of the sample environment is kept fixed at its initial temperature in the data analysis. To correct for this, we propose the use of a local temperature difference between the sample and the sample environment.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Paper flags insulation heating as bias source in corrected slope AC calorimetry for nanoparticles and suggests local ΔT correction, but provides no visible data or validation in the abstract.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this is a narrow methodological note for AC calorimetry on magnetic nanoparticles. The authors show that insulation around the sample can heat up during the measurement, and if your analysis holds the environment temperature fixed at its starting value, the corrected slope method will systematically misestimate the heating power. Their fix is to switch to a measured local temperature difference between the sample and its immediate surroundings.

What the work does is identify this specific analysis choice as the source of the error and spell out why it matters for insulated setups, which are standard to limit heat loss in hyperthermia experiments. That is a practical observation worth noting for labs running these measurements.

The soft spot is the complete absence of supporting evidence. The abstract states the problem and the proposed correction but supplies no data, no error estimates, no before-and-after comparisons, and no test of whether the local ΔT actually removes the bias or just trades one error for another. The stress-test concern about sensor placement is reasonable: any real local probe sits somewhere relative to the insulation, and if that changes conduction or convection paths the correction may still leave residual bias. Without the full paper showing quantitative checks on placement and heat-flow invariance, the claim stays untested.

This is aimed at experimental groups doing magnetic hyperthermia calorimetry who might be using the corrected slope method on insulated samples. A reader in that niche could pick up the warning and adjust their analysis, but the scope is too limited for broader interest. It is not a new framework or first-principles result.

I would send it to peer review if the full manuscript contains the missing validation experiments and addresses the placement issue. The topic has medical relevance and the potential error could affect other published work, so a referee could usefully check the evidence even if the paper needs substantial revision.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the impact of sample insulation on AC calorimetry measurements of magnetic nanoparticle heating power. It claims that temperature rise in the insulation produces systematic errors in the corrected slope method when the sample-environment temperature is fixed at its initial value during analysis, and proposes that measuring a local temperature difference between the sample and its immediate environment removes this bias.

Significance. If the central observation and proposed correction are robust, the work would provide a practical, low-cost improvement to heating-power estimation protocols used in magnetic hyperthermia research. The strength lies in identifying an experimental artifact that is likely common in insulated-sample setups; adoption of the local-ΔT approach could reduce systematic offsets without requiring major changes to existing apparatus. No machine-checked proofs or parameter-free derivations are present, but the result is framed as a falsifiable experimental correction.

major comments (2)

[section describing the local temperature difference method and associated data analysis] The central claim that the local-ΔT construction fully removes bias requires that the environment-temperature sensor does not alter dominant heat-flow paths or sample a different thermal boundary condition. No section of the manuscript reports tests in which the sensor position relative to the insulation layer is varied, nor any quantification of residual error under realistic placement offsets. This omission leaves the invariance of the corrected slope unverified and directly undermines the recommendation to switch to local ΔT.
[Results] The manuscript supplies no quantitative error analysis, uncertainty budgets, or comparison of heating-power values obtained with fixed versus local environment temperature. Without these, it is impossible to judge the magnitude of the reported systematic error or the improvement achieved by the proposed fix.

minor comments (2)

[Methods] Notation for the corrected slope method and the definition of local ΔT should be introduced with explicit equations rather than descriptive text only.
[Figure captions] Figure captions should state the insulation material, thickness, and sensor locations so that the geometry underlying the claimed effect is reproducible.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. We address each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [section describing the local temperature difference method and associated data analysis] The central claim that the local-ΔT construction fully removes bias requires that the environment-temperature sensor does not alter dominant heat-flow paths or sample a different thermal boundary condition. No section of the manuscript reports tests in which the sensor position relative to the insulation layer is varied, nor any quantification of residual error under realistic placement offsets. This omission leaves the invariance of the corrected slope unverified and directly undermines the recommendation to switch to local ΔT.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript lacks explicit tests varying the environment-temperature sensor position relative to the insulation and does not quantify residual errors from placement offsets. This limits verification of full invariance. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated discussion of sensor placement effects, including a qualitative analysis of how small offsets could influence the local ΔT measurement based on the thermal model already presented. We maintain that the local-ΔT method still removes the primary bias identified in the fixed-environment analysis, but we accept that additional experimental validation would be needed to fully support the recommendation. revision: partial
Referee: [Results] The manuscript supplies no quantitative error analysis, uncertainty budgets, or comparison of heating-power values obtained with fixed versus local environment temperature. Without these, it is impossible to judge the magnitude of the reported systematic error or the improvement achieved by the proposed fix.

Authors: We acknowledge the absence of a quantitative uncertainty budget and direct numerical comparisons between the two analysis approaches. In the revised manuscript we will add an error analysis section that includes propagated uncertainties for the heating-power estimates and explicit side-by-side tabulation (or plots) of values obtained with fixed versus local environment temperature, thereby quantifying both the systematic offset and the improvement from the proposed correction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; experimental observation and correction are independent of fitted inputs or self-citations

full rationale

The manuscript reports an experimental observation that insulation temperature rise can bias the corrected slope method when sample-environment temperature is held fixed at its initial value, and proposes using a measured local ΔT as a practical fix. No load-bearing equations, derivations, or parameter fits are described that reduce the claimed error or correction to a self-definition, a renamed fit, or a self-citation chain. The result is presented as a direct consequence of heat-flow physics under the stated conditions and is externally falsifiable by calorimetry measurements; therefore the derivation chain is self-contained.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; full manuscript text was not accessible for ledger construction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5621 in / 970 out tokens · 21073 ms · 2026-06-28T11:44:48.010038+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

17 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

[1]

(2013), ``Accuracy of available methods for quantifying the heat power generation of nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' Int

Andreu I., Natividad E. (2013), ``Accuracy of available methods for quantifying the heat power generation of nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' Int. J. Hyperth., vol. 29, pp. 739-751, doi: 10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3109/02656736.2013.826825

work page doi:10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 2013
[2]

(1959), ``Conduction of heat in solids,'' 2nd ed, OUP, pp

Carslaw H., Jaeger J. (1959), ``Conduction of heat in solids,'' 2nd ed, OUP, pp. 18-21

1959
[3]

Kavallaris M

Chang D., Lim M., Goos J., Qiao R., Ng Y., Mansfeld F., Jackson M., Davis T. Kavallaris M. (2018), ``Biologically targeted magnetic hyperthermia: potential and limitations,'' Front. Pharmacol., vol. 9, pp. 831, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00831 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00831

work page doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00831 2018
[4]

(2019), ``Nanomaterials for Magnetic and Optical Hyperthermia Applications,'' 1st ed., pp

Fratila R., Fuente, J. (2019), ``Nanomaterials for Magnetic and Optical Hyperthermia Applications,'' 1st ed., pp. 111-138, Elsevier, doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-00855-8 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-00855-8

work page doi:10.1016/c2017-0-00855-8 2019
[5]

(2014), ``wide-frequency range AC magnetometer to measure the specific absorption rate in nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' J

Garaio E., Collantes J., Garcia J., Plazaola F., Mornet S., Couillaud F., Sandre O. (2014), ``wide-frequency range AC magnetometer to measure the specific absorption rate in nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 368, pp. 432-437, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.021

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.021 2014
[6]

(1957), ``Selective inductive heating of lymph nodes, '' Ann

Gilchrist K., Medal R., Shorey D., Hanselman C., Parrott C., Taylor B. (1957), ``Selective inductive heating of lymph nodes, '' Ann. Surg., vol. 146, pp. 596-606, doi: 10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007

work page doi:10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007 1957
[7]

(2012), ``On the measurement technique for specific absorption rate of nanoparticles in an alternating electromagnetic field'' Meas

Huang S., Wang S., Gupta A., Borca-Tasciuc A., Salon S. (2012), ``On the measurement technique for specific absorption rate of nanoparticles in an alternating electromagnetic field'' Meas. Sci. Technol, vol. 23, pp. 035701, doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701

work page doi:10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701 2012
[8]

Maier-Hauff K.,Ulrich F., Nestler D., Niehoff H., Wust P., Thiesen B., Orawa H., Budach V., Jordan A. (2011), ``Efficacy and safety of intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy on patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme,'' J. Neurooncol., vol. 103, pp. 317-324, doi: 10.1007/s11060-0...

work page doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0389-0 2011
[9]

Miltenyi Biotec, https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/upload/assets/IM0001913.PDF https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/upload/assets/IM0001913.PDF Accessed: 2022-11-08

2022
[10]

(2008), ``Accurate measurement of the specific absorption rate using a suitable adiabatic magnetothermal setup,'' Appl

Natividad E., Castro M., Mediano A. (2008), ``Accurate measurement of the specific absorption rate using a suitable adiabatic magnetothermal setup,'' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92, pp. 093116, doi: 10.1063/1.2891084 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2891084

work page doi:10.1063/1.2891084 2008
[11]

(2009), ``Adiabatic vs

Natividad E., Castro M., Mediano A. (2009), ``Adiabatic vs. non-adiabatic determination of specific absorption rate of ferrofluids,'' J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 40, pp. 205-212, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.072 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.072

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.072 2009
[12]

(2020), ``Magnetic fluid hyperthermia simulations in evaluation of SAR calculation methods,'' Phys

Papadopoulosa C., Efthimiadoub E., Pissasc M., Fuentesd D., Boukosc N., Psycharisc V, Kordasc G., Loukopoulose V., Kagadisa G. (2020), ``Magnetic fluid hyperthermia simulations in evaluation of SAR calculation methods,'' Phys. Med., vol. 71, pp. 39-52, doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.011 2020
[13]

Wells J., Ortega D., Steinhoff U. Dutz S., Garaio E., Sandre O., Natividad Eva., Cruz M.; Brero F., Southern P., Pankhurst Q., Spassov S., RADIOMAG consortium (2020), ``Radiomag Interlaboratory Comparison of Magnetic Hyperthermia Characterisation Measurements: Data,'' zenodo.org, doi: https://zenodo.org/record/4281154\#.Y34d2X3MI2x https://zenodo.org/reco...

arXiv 2020
[14]

(2021), ``Potential Sources of Errors in Measuring and Evaluating the Specific Loss Power of Magnetic Nanoparticles in an Alternating Magnetic Field,'' IEEE Trans

Wang S., Huang S., Borca-Tasciuc D. (2021), ``Potential Sources of Errors in Measuring and Evaluating the Specific Loss Power of Magnetic Nanoparticles in an Alternating Magnetic Field,'' IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 49, pp. 255-262, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224648 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224648

work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2012.2224648 2021
[15]

(2021), ``Challenges and recommendations for magnetic hyperthermia characterization measurements,'' Int

Wells J., Ortega D., Steinhoff U., Dutz S., Garaio E., Sandre O., Natividad E., Cruz M., Brero F., Southern P. (2021), ``Challenges and recommendations for magnetic hyperthermia characterization measurements,'' Int. J. Hyperth., vol. 38, pp. 447-460, doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1892837 https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1892837

work page doi:10.1080/02656736.2021.1892837 2021
[16]

(2014), ``On the reliable measurement of specific absorption rates and intrinsic loss parameters in magnetic hyperthermia materials,'' J

Wildeboer R., Southern P., Pankhurst Q. (2014), ``On the reliable measurement of specific absorption rates and intrinsic loss parameters in magnetic hyperthermia materials,'' J. Phys. D, vol.47, pp. 495003, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003

work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003 2014
[17]

(1999), ``Newton's law of cooling,'' Contemp

Winterton R. (1999), ``Newton's law of cooling,'' Contemp. Phys., vol. 40, pp. 205-212, doi: 10.1080/001075199181549 https://doi.org/10.1080/001075199181549

work page doi:10.1080/001075199181549 1999

[1] [1]

(2013), ``Accuracy of available methods for quantifying the heat power generation of nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' Int

Andreu I., Natividad E. (2013), ``Accuracy of available methods for quantifying the heat power generation of nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' Int. J. Hyperth., vol. 29, pp. 739-751, doi: 10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 https://dx.doi.org/ 10.3109/02656736.2013.826825

work page doi:10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 2013

[2] [2]

(1959), ``Conduction of heat in solids,'' 2nd ed, OUP, pp

Carslaw H., Jaeger J. (1959), ``Conduction of heat in solids,'' 2nd ed, OUP, pp. 18-21

1959

[3] [3]

Kavallaris M

Chang D., Lim M., Goos J., Qiao R., Ng Y., Mansfeld F., Jackson M., Davis T. Kavallaris M. (2018), ``Biologically targeted magnetic hyperthermia: potential and limitations,'' Front. Pharmacol., vol. 9, pp. 831, doi: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00831 https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00831

work page doi:10.3389/fphar.2018.00831 2018

[4] [4]

(2019), ``Nanomaterials for Magnetic and Optical Hyperthermia Applications,'' 1st ed., pp

Fratila R., Fuente, J. (2019), ``Nanomaterials for Magnetic and Optical Hyperthermia Applications,'' 1st ed., pp. 111-138, Elsevier, doi: 10.1016/C2017-0-00855-8 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-00855-8

work page doi:10.1016/c2017-0-00855-8 2019

[5] [5]

(2014), ``wide-frequency range AC magnetometer to measure the specific absorption rate in nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' J

Garaio E., Collantes J., Garcia J., Plazaola F., Mornet S., Couillaud F., Sandre O. (2014), ``wide-frequency range AC magnetometer to measure the specific absorption rate in nanoparticles for magnetic hyperthermia,'' J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 368, pp. 432-437, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.021 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.021

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.11.021 2014

[6] [6]

(1957), ``Selective inductive heating of lymph nodes, '' Ann

Gilchrist K., Medal R., Shorey D., Hanselman C., Parrott C., Taylor B. (1957), ``Selective inductive heating of lymph nodes, '' Ann. Surg., vol. 146, pp. 596-606, doi: 10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007

work page doi:10.1097/00000658-195710000-00007 1957

[7] [7]

(2012), ``On the measurement technique for specific absorption rate of nanoparticles in an alternating electromagnetic field'' Meas

Huang S., Wang S., Gupta A., Borca-Tasciuc A., Salon S. (2012), ``On the measurement technique for specific absorption rate of nanoparticles in an alternating electromagnetic field'' Meas. Sci. Technol, vol. 23, pp. 035701, doi: 10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701 https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701

work page doi:10.1088/0957-0233/23/3/035701 2012

[8] [8]

Maier-Hauff K.,Ulrich F., Nestler D., Niehoff H., Wust P., Thiesen B., Orawa H., Budach V., Jordan A. (2011), ``Efficacy and safety of intratumoral thermotherapy using magnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles combined with external beam radiotherapy on patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme,'' J. Neurooncol., vol. 103, pp. 317-324, doi: 10.1007/s11060-0...

work page doi:10.1007/s11060-010-0389-0 2011

[9] [9]

Miltenyi Biotec, https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/upload/assets/IM0001913.PDF https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/upload/assets/IM0001913.PDF Accessed: 2022-11-08

2022

[10] [10]

(2008), ``Accurate measurement of the specific absorption rate using a suitable adiabatic magnetothermal setup,'' Appl

Natividad E., Castro M., Mediano A. (2008), ``Accurate measurement of the specific absorption rate using a suitable adiabatic magnetothermal setup,'' Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 92, pp. 093116, doi: 10.1063/1.2891084 https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2891084

work page doi:10.1063/1.2891084 2008

[11] [11]

(2009), ``Adiabatic vs

Natividad E., Castro M., Mediano A. (2009), ``Adiabatic vs. non-adiabatic determination of specific absorption rate of ferrofluids,'' J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 40, pp. 205-212, doi: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.072 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.072

work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2009.02.072 2009

[12] [12]

(2020), ``Magnetic fluid hyperthermia simulations in evaluation of SAR calculation methods,'' Phys

Papadopoulosa C., Efthimiadoub E., Pissasc M., Fuentesd D., Boukosc N., Psycharisc V, Kordasc G., Loukopoulose V., Kagadisa G. (2020), ``Magnetic fluid hyperthermia simulations in evaluation of SAR calculation methods,'' Phys. Med., vol. 71, pp. 39-52, doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.011 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.011

work page doi:10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.02.011 2020

[13] [13]

Wells J., Ortega D., Steinhoff U. Dutz S., Garaio E., Sandre O., Natividad Eva., Cruz M.; Brero F., Southern P., Pankhurst Q., Spassov S., RADIOMAG consortium (2020), ``Radiomag Interlaboratory Comparison of Magnetic Hyperthermia Characterisation Measurements: Data,'' zenodo.org, doi: https://zenodo.org/record/4281154\#.Y34d2X3MI2x https://zenodo.org/reco...

arXiv 2020

[14] [14]

(2021), ``Potential Sources of Errors in Measuring and Evaluating the Specific Loss Power of Magnetic Nanoparticles in an Alternating Magnetic Field,'' IEEE Trans

Wang S., Huang S., Borca-Tasciuc D. (2021), ``Potential Sources of Errors in Measuring and Evaluating the Specific Loss Power of Magnetic Nanoparticles in an Alternating Magnetic Field,'' IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 49, pp. 255-262, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224648 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.2012.2224648

work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2012.2224648 2021

[15] [15]

(2021), ``Challenges and recommendations for magnetic hyperthermia characterization measurements,'' Int

Wells J., Ortega D., Steinhoff U., Dutz S., Garaio E., Sandre O., Natividad E., Cruz M., Brero F., Southern P. (2021), ``Challenges and recommendations for magnetic hyperthermia characterization measurements,'' Int. J. Hyperth., vol. 38, pp. 447-460, doi: 10.1080/02656736.2021.1892837 https://doi.org/10.1080/02656736.2021.1892837

work page doi:10.1080/02656736.2021.1892837 2021

[16] [16]

(2014), ``On the reliable measurement of specific absorption rates and intrinsic loss parameters in magnetic hyperthermia materials,'' J

Wildeboer R., Southern P., Pankhurst Q. (2014), ``On the reliable measurement of specific absorption rates and intrinsic loss parameters in magnetic hyperthermia materials,'' J. Phys. D, vol.47, pp. 495003, doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003 https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003

work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/47/49/495003 2014

[17] [17]

(1999), ``Newton's law of cooling,'' Contemp

Winterton R. (1999), ``Newton's law of cooling,'' Contemp. Phys., vol. 40, pp. 205-212, doi: 10.1080/001075199181549 https://doi.org/10.1080/001075199181549

work page doi:10.1080/001075199181549 1999