pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.03059 · v1 · pith:UWG546GKnew · submitted 2026-06-02 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Dynamics of vapor bubble train in flow boiling heat transfer in microchannels

Odumuyiwa A. Odumosu , Tianyou Wang , Zhizhao Che This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 08:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords flow boilingmicrochannelsvapor bubble trainbubble dynamicsnumerical simulationheat transfertwo-phase flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

Numerical simulations show vapor bubble trains in microchannel flow boiling have frequency and growth rates set by initial vapor-liquid ratio and wall heat flux.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper numerically examines vapor bubble trains in microchannel flow boiling by using flow-focusing to generate monodispersed bubbles upstream in the channel. It establishes that raising the initial vapor-liquid volume ratio increases bubble frequency while decreasing growth rate because individual bubbles become smaller. Raising wall heat flux or lowering the working fluid's latent heat increases the overall bubble train growth rate through higher vaporization. Upstream vaporization expands bubbles and speeds their downstream motion, producing periodic fluctuations in wall temperature and Nusselt number as the train passes.

Core claim

The dynamics of vapor bubble trains in microchannel flow boiling are governed by the initial vapor-liquid volume ratio, which controls frequency and size-dependent growth, and by heat flux and latent heat, which control vaporization-driven expansion; upstream vaporization specifically accelerates downstream bubble movement.

What carries the argument

Numerical simulation of monodispersed vapor bubble trains generated by upstream flow-focusing to capture bubble-bubble interactions under constant wall heat flux.

If this is right

  • Bubble frequency rises as the initial vapor-liquid volume ratio increases.
  • Bubble growth rate falls with higher initial vapor-liquid volume ratio because of smaller individual bubble size.
  • Bubble train growth rate rises when wall heat flux increases or latent heat of the fluid decreases.
  • Vaporization in the upstream region expands bubbles and accelerates their motion farther downstream.
  • Wall temperature and Nusselt number fluctuate periodically each time a bubble passes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The identified upstream-to-downstream acceleration mechanism implies that bubble trains could produce more uniform heat removal than isolated bubbles in long channels.
  • The periodic fluctuations suggest that time-averaged heat transfer models for microchannel design may need to incorporate bubble passage frequency explicitly.
  • Extending the approach to varying channel geometries could test whether the same ratio and heat-flux scalings hold when confinement effects change.

Load-bearing premise

The flow-focusing method used to create the bubble trains produces interaction patterns that match those in real microchannel flow boiling without additional validation.

What would settle it

An experiment measuring bubble frequency, growth rate, and downstream velocity in a microchannel flow boiling setup without imposed flow-focusing, then checking whether the measured values match the simulated trends for the same vapor-liquid ratio and heat flux.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.03059 by Odumuyiwa A. Odumosu, Tianyou Wang, Zhizhao Che.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Simulation setup for the bubble train in microchannel flow boiling. (a) Overview of the simulation domain. (b) Dimensions of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Mesh for the 3D simulation domain. (b) Mesh at the flow-focusing junction. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: (a) Bubble volume Vb versus bubble center position for the bubble train in the grid independence study. The vapor-liquid volume ratio is 0.25 and the time is t = 10 ms. (b) Time variation of the bubble equivalent diameter compared with the results obtained by Mukherjee et al. [15]. (c) Dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 versus bubble center position xc/Dh compared with the results obtained by Ferrari et al… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Bubble train in microchannel flow boiling for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Bubble train phase fraction field in microchannel flow boiling for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Effects of initial vapor-liquid flow rate ratio on the volume and position of the bubbles in the stabilized state: (a) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 of a single bubble; (b) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble position xc/Dh of a single bubble; (c) Dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 versus bubble center position at a typical instant. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p00… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Time variation of the wall temperature at typical axial locations at the mid-point of the heated wall for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: This is because increasing VR enhances the bubble frequency and with more bubbles present within the microchannel, and the heat transfer is enhanced. 3.2. Effect of wall heat flux The wall heat flux qw is a key parameter for the boiling heat transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Temperature distribution along the center line of the heated bottom wall ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Average Nusselt number Nu versus time for different VR. 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Bubble train in microchannel flow boiling for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Effects of different heat fluxes on the volume and position of the bubbles in the stabilized state: (a) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 of a single bubble; (b) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble position xc/Dh of a single bubble; (c) Dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 versus bubble center position at a typical instant. of the bubbles in the microchannels are plotted agains… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Time variation of the wall temperature at typical axial location at the mid-point of the heated wall for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Bubble train in microchannel flow boiling for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Effects of latent heat of the working fluid on the volume and position of the bubbles in the stabilized state: (a) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 of a single bubble; (b) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble position xc/Dh of a single bubble; (c) Dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 versus bubble center position at a typical instant. velocity field, the effect of the Ca number… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Bubble train in microchannel flow boiling for di [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Capillary effects on the volume and position of the bubbles in the stabilized state: (a) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 of a single bubble; (b) Time variation of the dimensionless bubble position xc/Dh of a single bubble; (c) Dimensionless bubble volume Vb/Vb0 versus bubble center position at a typical instant. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_16.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Microchannel flow boiling is a promising technique for micro-device thermal management, and understanding the bubble dynamics in microchannel flow boiling is important for the applications. Previous studies only focused on single, isolated bubbles, but the bubbles in microchannel flow boiling applications often exist as bubble trains, in which the bubbles interact with each other. Here, we investigate numerically vapor bubble trains in microchannel flow boiling by adopting the flow-focusing technique to form monodispersed bubbles in the upstream of the microchannel. With increasing the initial vapor-liquid volume ratio, the bubble frequency increases while the growth rate of the bubbles decreases because of the reduced bubble size. With increasing the heat flux on the wall or reducing the latent heat of the working fluid, the bubble train growth rate increases because of the increased vaporization rate. The vaporization of the fluid in the upstream causes the bubble expansion and accelerates the bubble movement in the downstream. The wall temperature and the Nusselt number fluctuate because of the periodic pass-through of bubbles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper numerically studies vapor bubble trains in microchannel flow boiling by using flow-focusing to generate monodispersed bubbles upstream of the heated section. It reports that increasing the initial vapor-liquid volume ratio raises bubble frequency but lowers growth rate (due to smaller bubbles), that higher wall heat flux or lower latent heat increases train growth rate via enhanced vaporization, and that upstream vaporization drives downstream expansion and acceleration; wall temperature and Nusselt number fluctuate periodically with bubble passage.

Significance. If the simulated trains reproduce the statistics and interactions of wall-nucleated bubbles, the parametric trends on frequency, growth rate, and upstream-downstream coupling could inform design of microchannel heat sinks. The work addresses a gap relative to single-bubble studies, but its significance is constrained by the absence of any demonstrated equivalence between flow-focused and wall-nucleated trains.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical setup / Methods] The central claims (bubble frequency vs. volume ratio, growth rate vs. heat flux/latent heat, upstream vaporization accelerating downstream motion) rest on the premise that flow-focused trains are representative of real microchannel boiling. No section validates that the resulting size distribution, spacing, or wake dynamics match those measured in wall-nucleated experiments; the method injects bubbles at fixed upstream conditions and then applies wall heat flux, decoupling nucleation from the heat-transfer process that produces bubbles in applications.
  2. [Abstract / Results] The abstract states that 'the vaporization of the fluid in the upstream causes the bubble expansion and accelerates the bubble movement in the downstream,' yet the provided description contains no equations, mesh details, boundary conditions, or error analysis supporting the causal attribution; all trends are stated as outcomes without visible derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract reports trends without citing the specific volume ratios, heat fluxes, or fluids examined; adding these values would improve traceability.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions and axis labels should explicitly state the nondimensional groups used (e.g., vapor-liquid volume ratio definition) to allow direct comparison with prior single-bubble work.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below and note revisions where the manuscript will be updated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical setup / Methods] The central claims (bubble frequency vs. volume ratio, growth rate vs. heat flux/latent heat, upstream vaporization accelerating downstream motion) rest on the premise that flow-focused trains are representative of real microchannel boiling. No section validates that the resulting size distribution, spacing, or wake dynamics match those measured in wall-nucleated experiments; the method injects bubbles at fixed upstream conditions and then applies wall heat flux, decoupling nucleation from the heat-transfer process that produces bubbles in applications.

    Authors: Our study intentionally adopts flow-focusing to generate controlled, monodispersed bubble trains upstream of the heated section. This setup isolates the effects of initial vapor-liquid volume ratio, heat flux, and latent heat on train dynamics and interactions, which is the paper's focus. We agree that no direct quantitative validation against wall-nucleated experimental statistics (size distribution, spacing, wake) is provided, as the work is purely numerical. In revision we will add a limitations subsection that discusses the differences between flow-focused and wall-nucleated trains, cites relevant experimental literature on microchannel bubble trains, and clarifies the scope of applicability of the reported trends. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract / Results] The abstract states that 'the vaporization of the fluid in the upstream causes the bubble expansion and accelerates the bubble movement in the downstream,' yet the provided description contains no equations, mesh details, boundary conditions, or error analysis supporting the causal attribution; all trends are stated as outcomes without visible derivation.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary; the full manuscript contains the governing equations, mesh details, boundary conditions, and mesh-independence/error analysis in the Methods section, with the upstream-downstream coupling demonstrated via simulation results (velocity and phase fields). The causal statement is an interpretation of those results. We will revise the abstract to phrase the claim more precisely as an observation supported by the simulations and will ensure the Results section explicitly ties the observed expansion and acceleration to the upstream vaporization mechanism. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: simulation outputs are direct results of the numerical setup

full rationale

The paper reports parametric trends from a numerical simulation of bubble trains generated via flow-focusing upstream of a heated microchannel section. No analytical derivations, fitted parameters, self-citations invoked as uniqueness theorems, or renamings of known results appear in the provided text. The reported effects (frequency vs. volume ratio, growth rate vs. heat flux/latent heat) are direct consequences of the imposed boundary conditions and phase-change model rather than quantities that reduce to the inputs by construction. This is the expected outcome for a self-contained simulation study without load-bearing analytical steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only input supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; all such elements are therefore recorded as empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5711 in / 1172 out tokens · 17929 ms · 2026-06-28T08:38:56.783978+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    T. G. Karayiannis, M. M. Mahmoud, Flow boiling in microchannels: Fundamentals and applications, Applied Thermal Engineering 115 (2017) 1372–1397.doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.063

    work page doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.063 2017

  2. [2]

    Mudawar, Recent advances in high-flux, two-phase thermal management, Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications 5 (2) (2013) 021012.doi:10.1115/1.4023599

    I. Mudawar, Recent advances in high-flux, two-phase thermal management, Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications 5 (2) (2013) 021012.doi:10.1115/1.4023599

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4023599 2013

  3. [3]

    Valeh-e Sheyda, M

    P. Valeh-e Sheyda, M. Rahimi, E. Karimi, M. Asadi, Application of two-phase flow for cooling of hybrid microchannel PV cells: A comparative study, Energy Conversion and Management 69 (2013) 122–130. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.01.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2013.01.029 2013

  4. [4]

    H. Wu, S. Zhou, D. Wang, Y . Yang, L. Liu, H. Mao, B. Shu, Predictive modeling for microchannel flow boiling heat transfer under the dual effect of gravity and surface modification, Processes 12 (5) (2024) 1028.doi: 10.3390/pr12051028

    work page doi:10.3390/pr12051028 2024

  5. [5]

    Mudawar, Two-phase microchannel heat sinks: theory, applications, and limitations, Journal of Electronic Packaging 133 (4) (2011) 041002.doi:10.1115/1.4005300

    I. Mudawar, Two-phase microchannel heat sinks: theory, applications, and limitations, Journal of Electronic Packaging 133 (4) (2011) 041002.doi:10.1115/1.4005300

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4005300 2011

  6. [6]

    J. R. Thome, Boiling in microchannels: a review of experiment and theory, International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 25 (2) (2004) 128–139.doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2003.11.005

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2003.11.005 2004

  7. [7]

    C. Huh, C. W. Choi, M. H. Kim, Elongated bubble behavior during flow boiling in a microchannel, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology 21 (11) (2007) 1819.doi:10.1007/BF03177438. 17

    work page doi:10.1007/bf03177438 2007

  8. [8]

    Yan, X.-q

    S.-l. Yan, X.-q. Wang, L.-t. Zhu, X.-b. Zhang, Z.-h. Luo, Mechanisms and modeling of bubble dynamic behaviors and mass transfer under gravity: A review, Chemical Engineering Science 277 (2023) 118854.doi:10.1016/ j.ces.2023.118854

    arXiv 2023

  9. [9]

    Harirchian, S

    T. Harirchian, S. V . Garimella, Boiling heat transfer and flow regimes in microchannels—a comprehensive understanding, Journal of Electronic Packaging 133 (1) (2011) 011001.doi:10.1115/1.4002721

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4002721 2011

  10. [10]

    J. R. Thome, A. Cioncolini, Two-phase flow pattern maps for microchannels, World Scientific, 2015, pp. 47–84. doi:10.1142/9789814623216_0020

    work page doi:10.1142/9789814623216_0020 2015

  11. [11]

    xdss.2025.100123

    L. Cheng, G. Xia, Fundamental issues, mechanisms and models of flow boiling heat transfer in microscale channels, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 108 (2017) 97–127.doi:10.1016/j. ijheatmasstransfer.2016.12.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j 2017

  12. [12]

    S. T. Kadam, I. Hassan, R. Kumar, M. A. Rahman, Bubble dynamics in microchannel: An overview of the state-of-the-art, Meccanica 56 (3) (2021) 481–513.doi:10.1007/s11012-020-01300-4

    work page doi:10.1007/s11012-020-01300-4 2021

  13. [13]

    Revellin, V

    R. Revellin, V . Dupont, T. Ursenbacher, J. R. Thome, I. Zun, Characterization of diabatic two-phase flows in microchannels: Flow parameter results for R-134a in a 0.5mm channel, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 32 (7) (2006) 755–774.doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.02.016

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2006.02.016 2006

  14. [14]

    Mukherjee, S

    A. Mukherjee, S. G. Kandlikar, Numerical simulation of growth of a vapor bubble during flow boiling of water in a microchannel, Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 1 (2) (2005) 137–145.doi:10.1007/s10404-004-0021-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10404-004-0021-8 2005

  15. [15]

    Mukherjee, S

    A. Mukherjee, S. G. Kandlikar, Z. J. Edel, Numerical study of bubble growth and wall heat transfer during flow boiling in a microchannel, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 54 (15-16) (2011) 3702–3718. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.01.030

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.01.030 2011

  16. [16]

    Zhuan, W

    R. Zhuan, W. Wang, Flow pattern of boiling in micro-channel by numerical simulation, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 55 (5) (2012) 1741–1753.doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.11.029

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.11.029 2012

  17. [17]

    Ferrari, M

    A. Ferrari, M. Magnini, J. R. Thome, Numerical analysis of slug flow boiling in square microchannels, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 123 (2018) 928–944.doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.012 2018

  18. [18]

    Y . Luo, W. Li, K. Zhou, K. Sheng, S. Shao, Z. Zhang, J. Du, W. J. Minkowycz, Three-dimensional numerical simulation of saturated annular flow boiling in a narrow rectangular microchannel, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 149 (2020) 119246.doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119246

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.119246 2020

  19. [19]

    Z. Guo, B. S. Haynes, D. F. Fletcher, Numerical simulation of annular flow boiling in microchannels, The Journal of Computational Multiphase Flows 8 (1) (2016) 61–82.doi:10.1177/1757482X16634205

    work page doi:10.1177/1757482x16634205 2016

  20. [20]

    A. Priy, I. Ahmad, M. K. Khan, M. Pathak, Bubble interaction and heat transfer characteristics of microchannel flow boiling with single and multiple cavities, Journal of Thermal Science and Engineering Applications 16 (6) (2024) 061010.doi:10.1115/1.4065187

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4065187 2024

  21. [21]

    Zhang, Y

    X. Zhang, Y . Zhang, C. Yang, J. Liu, B. Liu, Z. Zhou, Study of flow and heat transfer performance of nanofluids in curved microchannels with different curvatures, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications (2024) 1– 22doi:10.1080/10407782.2024.2321520

    work page doi:10.1080/10407782.2024.2321520 2024

  22. [22]

    O. A. Odumosu, H. Xu, T. Wang, Z. Che, Growth of elongated vapor bubbles during flow boiling heat transfer in wavy microchannels, Applied Thermal Engineering 223 (2023) 119987.doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng. 2023.119987

    work page doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng 2023

  23. [23]

    Zhang, G

    Z. Zhang, G. Zhang, M. Wei, Y . Zhang, M. Tian, Numerical simulation of boiling behavior in vertical microchannels, Physics of Fluids 35 (9) (2023) 092011.doi:10.1063/5.0167304. 18

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0167304 2023

  24. [24]

    A. H. Rajkotwala, L. L. Boer, E. A. J. F. Peters, C. W. M. van der Geld, J. G. M. Kuerten, J. A. M. Kuipers, M. W. Baltussen, A numerical study of flow boiling in a microchannel using the local front reconstruction method, AIChE Journal 68 (4) (2022) e17598.doi:10.1002/aic.17598

    work page doi:10.1002/aic.17598 2022

  25. [25]

    Q. Liu, W. Wang, B. Palm, C. Wang, X. Jiang, On the dynamics and heat transfer of bubble train in micro- channel flow boiling, International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer 87 (2017) 198–203.doi: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.07.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2017.07.002 2017

  26. [26]

    Magnini, J

    M. Magnini, J. R. Thome, Computational study of saturated flow boiling within a microchannel in the slug flow regime, Journal of Heat Transfer 138 (2) (2016) 021502.doi:10.1115/1.4031234

    work page doi:10.1115/1.4031234 2016

  27. [27]

    S. S. Bertsch, E. A. Groll, S. V . Garimella, Effects of heat flux, mass flux, vapor quality, and saturation temperature on flow boiling heat transfer in microchannels, International Journal of Multiphase Flow 35 (2) (2009) 142–154.doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.10.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2008.10.004 2009

  28. [28]

    P. Zhu, L. Wang, Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review, Lab on a Chip 17 (1) (2017) 34–75.doi:10.1039/C6LC01018K

    work page doi:10.1039/c6lc01018k 2017

  29. [29]

    C. N. Baroud, F. Gallaire, R. Dangla, Dynamics of microfluidic droplets, Lab on a Chip 10 (16) (2010) 2032– 2045.doi:10.1039/C001191F

    work page doi:10.1039/c001191f 2010

  30. [30]

    Scheufler, J

    H. Scheufler, J. Roenby, TwoPhaseFlow: A framework for developing two phase flow solvers in OpenFOAM, OpenFOAM®Journal 3 (2023) 200–224.doi:10.51560/ofj.v3.80

    work page doi:10.51560/ofj.v3.80 2023

  31. [31]

    J. U. Brackbill, D. B. Kothe, C. Zemach, A continuum method for modeling surface tension, Journal of Computational Physics 100 (2) (1992) 335–354.doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-y

    work page doi:10.1016/0021-9991(92)90240-y 1992

  32. [32]

    Hardt, F

    S. Hardt, F. Wondra, Evaporation model for interfacial flows based on a continuum-field representation of the source terms, Journal of Computational Physics 227 (11) (2008) 5871–5895.doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.02. 020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcp.2008.02 2008

  33. [33]

    Y . Luo, J. Zhang, W. Li, E. Sokolova, Y . Li, W. Minkowycz, Numerical investigation of the bubble growth in horizontal rectangular microchannels, Numerical Heat Transfer, Part A: Applications 71 (12) (2017) 1175–1188. doi:10.1080/10407782.2017.1350538

    work page doi:10.1080/10407782.2017.1350538 2017

  34. [34]

    S. L. Anna, Droplets and bubbles in microfluidic devices, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics 48 (2016) 285– 309.doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034425

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-fluid-122414-034425 2016

  35. [35]

    flow focusing

    S. L. Anna, N. Bontoux, H. A. Stone, Formation of dispersions using “flow focusing” in microchannels, Applied Physics Letters 82 (3) (2003) 364–366.doi:10.1063/1.1537519

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1537519 2003

  36. [36]

    Moragues, D

    T. Moragues, D. Arguijo, T. Beneyton, C. Modavi, K. Simutis, A. R. Abate, J.-C. Baret, A. J. deMello, D. Densmore, A. D. Griffiths, Droplet-based microfluidics, Nature Reviews Methods Primers 3 (1) (2023) 32. doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00212-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s43586-023-00212-3 2023

  37. [37]

    Z. Che, T. N. Wong, N.-T. Nguyen, C. Yang, Three dimensional features of convective heat transfer in droplet- based microchannel heat sinks, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 86 (2015) 455–464.doi: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.03.030. 19

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2015.03.030 2015