pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04711 · v1 · pith:SJMFTLYDnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA · astro-ph.HE

ABCD: The Nuclear Structure of the Little Red Dots Revealted through Absorption, Break, Continuum, and Decrement

Chang-Hao Chen , Jinyi Shangguan , Luis C. Ho , Zijian Zhang , Kohei Inayoshi , Ruancun Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE
keywords little red dotsBalmer decrementnuclear structuregaseous torushigh-redshift galaxiesBalmer absorptionphotoionizationAGN
0
0 comments X

The pith

Little red dots show a clumpy gaseous torus around the central disk with broad-line clouds along polar directions, making their spectra depend on viewing angle.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper decomposes the emission and absorption lines in spectra of 14 little red dots at redshifts 2.2 to 6.7. Narrow-line Balmer decrements match case B recombination with mild dust, while broad-line decrements point to gas densities above 10^9 per cubic centimeter. Absorption lines in six sources have covering factors over 50 percent, and blueshifted absorption links to higher dust content. The authors conclude these traits arise from an optically thick clumpy torus encircling the accretion disk, with clouds and absorbers concentrated in the less-obscured polar directions.

Core claim

The distinctive spectral and continuum properties of little red dots are explained via a viewing angle-dependent nuclear structure in which an optically thick, clumpy gaseous torus surrounds the central accretion disk, with broad-line clouds and absorbers distributed along the less-obscured polar directions.

What carries the argument

Viewing angle-dependent nuclear structure consisting of an optically thick clumpy gaseous torus around the accretion disk plus polar broad-line clouds and absorbers

If this is right

  • Narrow-line Balmer decrements remain consistent with case B recombination plus mild dust attenuation across the sample.
  • Broad-line decrements match photoionization models only for gas densities at or above 10^9 cm^{-3}.
  • Balmer absorption lines indicate absorber covering factors exceeding 50 percent in six sources.
  • A radial density profile with power-law index below 2 reproduces the centrally peaked decrements in three sources under the virial assumption.
  • The luminosity inferred from broad and narrow H-alpha matches the observed continuum through photoionization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the torus-plus-polar-cloud geometry holds, little red dots may represent the same central engine as other active galaxies viewed at particular angles.
  • The link between blueshifted absorption and elevated narrow-line decrements suggests outflows carry dust that affects the observed narrow-line ratios.
  • The model predicts that sources viewed more face-on would show weaker absorption and lower Balmer decrements.

Load-bearing premise

The model that reproduces the velocity-resolved Balmer decrements assumes virialized dynamics in the broad-line region.

What would settle it

High signal-to-noise spectra of additional little red dots that show velocity-resolved Balmer decrement profiles requiring a radial density power-law index of 2 or greater, or that lack high-covering-factor absorbers in sources with blueshifted lines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04711 by Chang-Hao Chen, Jinyi Shangguan, Kohei Inayoshi, Luis C. Ho, Ruancun Li, Zijian Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectral fits for (a) [O III] λλ4959, 5007, (b) Hα, (c) Hβ, and (d) Hγ for SID-42232 (left), SID-68797 (middle), and SID-49140 (right). The top row in each panel shows the data and uncertainty in black line with gray errorbars, and the continuum, narrow-line component, broad-line component, and total model purple, blue, green, and red lines, respectively. Residuals are displayed in the bottom row. while re… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Continuum fits of the prism spectra for (a) SID-42232, (b) SID-68797, and (c) SID-49140. The data are plotted as black solid lines, with the uncertainties shown in gray. The models are shown by the blue solid lines, with the power-law component and the spherical dense gas model of Liu et al. (2025) plotted in cyan and magenta, respectively. The adopted values of dust extinction are labeled in the plot. FWH… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The Hα/Hβ and Hβ/Hγ line ratio for the (a) broad and (b) narrow line. The squares with errorbars are measurements for our sample. Since SID-28074, SID-42046, and SID-55604 do not have medium-resolution spectra coverage of the Hγ line, we plot the Hα/Hβ ratio as triangles with errorbars on the right side of each panel, with the horizontal positions slightly shifted for clarity. All data points are color-cod… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Variation of the Balmer decrement with the Balmer break strength. Green and blue points with errorbars represent the narrow and broad compo￾nent, respectively. Points circled in cyan, orange, red, and purple mark SID-28074, SID-42046, SID-55604, and SID-68797. Theoretical curves from Yan et al. (2026) for column density NH = (1023 , 1024 , 1025) cm−2 are shown as black lines; black diamonds mark number den… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The absorption features in six LRDs. The ob￾served data, plotted in black with errorbars displaying the uncertainties, are normalized by the best-fit emission-line model. The best-fit absorption-line models are shown in blue; the red lines represent the absorber with the same ve￾locity dispersion σ and covering factor Cf but with a large optical depth of τ = 106 . Φ can then be derived from the inferred ga… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Comparison between the input values of (a) optical depth, (b) velocity dispersion, and (c) covering factor for the mock spectra and the best-fit absorption-line parameters for SID-42046. The open and filled grey points indicate mocks with velocity dispersion σ ≥ 10 km s−1 and σ < 20 km s−1 , respectively, with their median value and standard deviation in each bin plotted as red and blue squares. larger tha… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The observed UV and optical luminosity as a function of the incident luminosity predicted from broad and narrow Hα emission. Green solid line represents the relation between observed luminosity (integrated from 1000 − 8000 ˚A) and the incident luminosity predicted from the composite spectrum of local quasars (Vanden Berk et al. 2001). Black solid line gives the 1:1 relation. Blue dashed line shows the best… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: A conceptual illustration of “clumpy gaseous torus” nuclear structure of LRDs. The BH (black dot) and its accretion disk (blue oval) are enshrouded in an ambient gas reservoir (regions in red). The density of the gas reservoir is angle-dependent, being highest along the major axis of the accretion disk (dark red) and lowest along the polar direction (light red). The high-density gas constitutes the optical… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Balmer decrement as a function of velocity for the five sources with average SNR > 3: (a) SID-28074, (b) SID-42046, (c) SID-49140, (d) SID-55604, and (e) SID-68797. The best-fit stratified gas model is plotted as a red solid curve, with uncertainties shown by the shaded regions. The legend gives the reduced χ 2 of the fit as well as the power-law index for the density profile (β). tion calculations and vir… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a spectroscopic analysis of 14 little red dots (LRDs) at redshifts $2.2 < z < 6.7$ using NIRSpec/MSA prism and medium-resolution grating observations, aiming to constrain the nuclear gas structure through Balmer emission-line profiles, absorption features, relative line intensities, and continuum properties. We simultaneously decompose the broad, narrow, and absorption components of ${\rm H \alpha}$, ${\rm H \beta}$, and ${\rm H \gamma}$, and measure both integrated line ratios and velocity-resolved Balmer decrements. The narrow-line Balmer decrements are broadly consistent with Case~B recombination modified by mild dust attenuation, while the broad-line decrements are elevated to levels consistent with photoionization models of high-density gas at $n_{\rm H} \gtrsim 10^9\ {\rm cm^{-3}}$. Velocity-resolved Balmer decrements in five sources with highest signal-to-noise ratio are centrally peaked. Assuming virialized broad-line region dynamics, our model can reproduce the Balmer decrement profiles in three sources using a radial density profile with a power-law index $\beta<2$. The Balmer absorption lines detected in six sources yield absorber covering factors exceeding $50\%$. Sources with blueshifted absorption lines tend to have elevated narrow-line Balmer decrement, suggesting a connection between dust content and the presence of outflow. Comparing the incident luminosity inferred from broad and narrow ${\rm H \alpha}$ emission with the continuum suggests that both the UV and optical continuum and the line emission are linked by photoionization. We propose that the distinctive spectral and continuum properties of LRDs can be explained via a viewing angle-dependent nuclear structure in which an optically thick, clumpy gaseous torus surrounds the central accretion disk, with broad-line clouds and absorbers distributed along the less-obscured polar directions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes NIRSpec/MSA spectra of 14 little red dots (LRDs) at 2.2 < z < 6.7. It decomposes broad, narrow, and absorption components of Hα, Hβ, and Hγ, measures integrated line ratios and velocity-resolved Balmer decrements, and reports centrally peaked decrements in the five highest-S/N sources. Assuming virialized BLR dynamics, a radial density profile with power-law index β<2 is stated to reproduce the decrement profiles in three sources; absorber covering factors exceed 50% in six sources. The authors propose that LRD properties arise from a viewing-angle-dependent nuclear structure consisting of an optically thick clumpy gaseous torus surrounding the accretion disk, with broad-line clouds and absorbers along less-obscured polar directions.

Significance. If the quantitative reproduction of the velocity-resolved decrements holds under the stated assumptions, the work would supply a unified geometric picture linking the continuum shape, elevated broad-line decrements, absorption features, and narrow-line properties of LRDs through orientation effects. This could inform models of high-redshift AGN structure and the physical nature of the LRD population.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the model reproduces the centrally peaked velocity-resolved Balmer decrements in three sources rests on an assumed virialized BLR plus a radial density power-law index β<2, yet no error bars, χ² values, or quantitative comparison to alternative kinematic models (e.g., outflows) are provided; this step is load-bearing for the proposed torus-plus-polar-cloud geometry.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the power-law index β is described as chosen such that the model matches the observed decrements, while the torus geometry is simultaneously constructed to account for the same absorption and continuum data; this introduces circularity that weakens the claim that the geometry is directly constrained by the observations.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: blueshifted absorption is reported in six sources, which is consistent with outflows, yet the model assumes purely virialized BLR dynamics; the tension between these kinematic indicators is not addressed and directly affects the reliability of the β<2 density-profile inference.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that narrow-line decrements are 'broadly consistent' with Case B but does not quantify the range of implied E(B-V) values or compare them to standard dust laws.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which help clarify the presentation of our results. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the suggested improvements.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that the model reproduces the centrally peaked velocity-resolved Balmer decrements in three sources rests on an assumed virialized BLR plus a radial density power-law index β<2, yet no error bars, χ² values, or quantitative comparison to alternative kinematic models (e.g., outflows) are provided; this step is load-bearing for the proposed torus-plus-polar-cloud geometry.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative support for the model fits would strengthen the claim. In the revised manuscript we will add error bars to the velocity-resolved Balmer decrement profiles, report χ² values for the β<2 power-law fits to the three sources, and include a short discussion comparing the virialized model to outflow alternatives, noting that the observed profile symmetries favor virial motion. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the power-law index β is described as chosen such that the model matches the observed decrements, while the torus geometry is simultaneously constructed to account for the same absorption and continuum data; this introduces circularity that weakens the claim that the geometry is directly constrained by the observations.

    Authors: The value of β is obtained solely from fitting the velocity-resolved decrements under the virial assumption. The clumpy torus geometry is motivated independently by the continuum spectral shape, the measured absorption covering factors, and the narrow-line properties. We will revise the text to make this separation of constraints explicit and remove any appearance of circularity. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: blueshifted absorption is reported in six sources, which is consistent with outflows, yet the model assumes purely virialized BLR dynamics; the tension between these kinematic indicators is not addressed and directly affects the reliability of the β<2 density-profile inference.

    Authors: The manuscript already notes that blueshifted absorption correlates with elevated narrow-line decrements and suggests an outflow connection. The broad-line profiles used for the decrement analysis remain symmetric, consistent with virial motion, while the absorption may arise from a separate component. We will expand the discussion section to address this kinematic distinction and its limited impact on the BLR density-profile inference. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Reproduction of Balmer decrement profiles achieved by fitting radial density index β<2 to the same observations

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Abstract]
    "Assuming virialized broad-line region dynamics, our model can reproduce the Balmer decrement profiles in three sources using a radial density profile with a power-law index β<2."

    The index β is adjusted to match the centrally peaked velocity-resolved decrements observed in the three high-S/N sources; the claimed reproduction is therefore achieved by construction through fitting the free parameter to the target data rather than deriving it from external constraints or first principles.

full rationale

The paper's central quantitative support for the proposed viewing-angle-dependent nuclear structure (clumpy torus + polar BLR/absorbers) is the statement that a model assuming virialized dynamics reproduces the velocity-resolved decrements in three sources when a power-law density index β<2 is adopted. Because β is selected specifically to match the observed profiles, this reproduction is a direct consequence of the parameter choice rather than an independent prediction or test of the geometry. Other elements (narrow-line decrements, absorption covering factors, continuum comparisons) provide context but do not independently constrain the torus+polar distribution. This constitutes one instance of fitted input called prediction, yielding partial circularity in the derivation chain while leaving room for independent interpretive content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The model rests on one domain assumption about virial motion and introduces one new structural entity whose parameters are adjusted to the data.

free parameters (2)
  • radial density power-law index β = <2
    Adjusted to reproduce centrally peaked Balmer decrement profiles in three sources
  • gas density n_H = >=10^9 cm^{-3}
    Inferred from broad-line Balmer decrements to be at least 10^9 cm^{-3}
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Broad-line region gas follows virialized dynamics
    Invoked to convert velocity-resolved decrements into a radial density profile
invented entities (1)
  • optically thick clumpy gaseous torus no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides viewing-angle dependent obscuration and explains absorption covering factors and continuum properties
    New structural component introduced to unify the observed spectral features

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5904 in / 1351 out tokens · 32435 ms · 2026-06-28T05:40:04.835836+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Little Red Dots as Supermassive Analogs of SS 433

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    LRDs are interpreted as high-inclination hyper-Eddington accreting SMBHs analogous to SS 433, with V-shaped SEDs, X-ray weakness, and Balmer breaks emerging from disk self-shielding geometry.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Berg, D. A., et al. 2025a, , 980, L29

  2. [2]

    B., Casey, C

    Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., Lambrides, E., et al. 2025b, , 991, 37

  3. [3]

    T., Bogd\'an, \'A, Kov\'acs, O., et al

    Ananna, T. T., Bogd\'an, \'A, Kov\'acs, O., et al. 2024, , 969, L18

    2024

  4. [4]

    1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

    Antonucci, R. 1993, ARA&A, 31, 473

    1993

  5. [5]

    2026, , submitted (arXiv:2601.10573)

    Asada, Y., Inayoshi, K., Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., & Willott, C. 2026, , submitted (arXiv:2601.10573)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    B., Finkelstein, S

    Bagley, M. B., Finkelstein, S. L., Koekemoer, A. M., et al. 2023, , 946, L12

    2023

  7. [7]

    A., Ferland, G

    Baldwin, J. A., Ferland, G. J., Martin, P. G., et al. 1991, , 374, 580

    1991

  8. [8]

    1996, A&A, 117, 393

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&A, 117, 393

    1996

  9. [9]

    1952, , 112, 195

    Bondi, H. 1952, , 112, 195

    1952

  10. [10]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., & Coppi, P. 2008, , 686, 1503

    2008

  11. [11]

    B., van Dokkum, P

    Brammer, G. B., van Dokkum, P. G., Franx, M., et al. 2012, , 200, 13

    2012

  12. [12]

    2025, , 544, L167

    Brazzini, M., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2025, , 544, L167

    2025

  13. [13]

    2011, , 728, 58

    Burlon, D., Ajello, M., Greiner, J., et al. 2011, , 728, 58

    2011

  14. [14]

    P., & Anderson, D

    Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. 2002, Model Selection and Multimodel Inference, (2nd edn)(New York, Springer-Verlag)

    2002

  15. [15]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, , 533, 682

    2000

  16. [16]

    Capriotti, E. R. 1964, , 139, 225

    1964

  17. [17]

    J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., et al

    Chang, S. J., Gronke, M., Matthee, J., et al. 2026, , 545, staf2131

    2026

  18. [18]

    2023, RMxAA, 59, 327

    Chatzikos, M., Bianchi, S., Camilloni, F., et al. 2023, RMxAA, 59, 327

    2023

  19. [19]

    C., Li, R., & Inayoshi, K

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Inayoshi, K. 2025a, , 989, L12

  20. [20]

    C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y

    Chen, C.-H., Ho, L. C., Li, R., & Zhuang, M.-Y. 2025b, , 983, 60

  21. [21]

    Chen, K., Li, Z., Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2025c, , 994, L42

  22. [22]

    Crenshaw, D. M. 1986, , 62, 821

    1986

  23. [23]

    2025a, A&A, 697, A189

    de Graaff, A., Brammer, G., Weibel, A., et al. 2025a, A&A, 697, A189

  24. [24]

    E., Naidu, R

    de Graaff, A., Hviding, R. E., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2026, , submitted (arXiv:2511.21820)

    arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    2024, A&A, 684, A87

    de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Carniani, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A87

    2024

  26. [26]

    P., et al

    de Graaff, A., Rix, H.-W., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2025b, A&A, 701, A168

  27. [27]

    2026, , 545, staf2117

    D'Eugenio, F., Juod z balis, I., Ji, X., et al. 2026, , 545, staf2117

    2026

  28. [28]

    2008, , , 383, 581

    Dong, X., Wang, T., Wang, J., et al. 2008, , , 383, 581

    2008

  29. [29]

    Draine, B. T. 2011, Physics of the Interstellar and Intergalactic Medium (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press)

    2011

  30. [30]

    Fabian, A. C. 1999, , 308, L39

    1999

  31. [31]

    P., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al

    Fei, Q., Fujimoto, S., Naidu, R. P., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al. 2026, , 1003, 244

    2026

  32. [32]

    C., Li, S

    Feng, H. C., Li, S. S., Bai, J. M., Liu, H. T., Lu, K. X., et al. 2024, , 976, 176

    2024

  33. [33]

    T, Verner, D

    Ferland, G., Korista, K. T, Verner, D. A., et al. 1998, PASP, 110, 761

    1998

  34. [34]

    Frank, J., King, A., & Raine, D. J. 2002, Accretion Power in Astrophysics: Third Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press)

    2002

  35. [35]

    2024, Nature, 628, 57

    Furtak, L., Labb\'e, I., Zitrin, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 628, 57

    2024

  36. [36]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., et al. 2003, , 594, 279

    2003

  37. [37]

    E., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., & Ho, L. C. 2005, , 630, 122

    2005

  38. [38]

    E., Labb\'e, I., Goulding, A

    Greene, J. E., Labb\'e, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, , 964, 39

    2024

  39. [39]

    E., Setton, D

    Greene, J. E., Setton, D. J., Furtak, L. J., et al. 2026, ApJ, 996, 129

    2026

  40. [40]

    E., Strader, J., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 257

    2020

  41. [41]

    A., Kocevski, D

    Grogin, N. A., Kocevski, D. D., Faber, S. M., et al. 2011, , 197, 35

    2011

  42. [42]

    B.\ 2007, , 133, 4, 1271

    Hall, P. B.\ 2007, , 133, 4, 1271

    2007

  43. [43]

    E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al

    Heintz, K. E., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, Sci, 384, 890

    2024

  44. [44]

    C., Filippenko, A

    Ho, L. C., Filippenko, A. V., & Sargent, W. L. W. 1997, , 112, 315

    1997

  45. [45]

    C., & Kim, M

    Ho, L. C., & Kim, M. 2009, , 184, 398

    2009

  46. [46]

    E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T

    Hviding, R. E., de Graaff, A., Miller, T. B., et al. 2025, A&A, 702, A57

    2025

  47. [47]

    V., Narayan, R., & Abramowicz, M

    Igumenshchev, I. V., Narayan, R., & Abramowicz, M. A. 2003, , 592, 1042

    2003

  48. [48]

    C ., La Mura, G., et al

    Ili\'c, D., Popovi\'c, L. C ., La Mura, G., et al. 2012, A&A, 543, A142

    2012

  49. [49]

    2025, , 988, L22

    Inayoshi, K. 2025, , 988, L22

    2025

  50. [50]

    Inayoshi, K., & Ho, L. C. 2026, (arXiv:2512.03130)

    arXiv 2026

  51. [51]

    2024, , 973, L49

    Inayoshi, K., & Ichikawa, K. 2024, , 973, L49

    2024

  52. [52]

    2025, , 980, L27

    Inayoshi, K., & Maiolino, R. 2025, , 980, L27

    2025

  53. [53]

    2026a, ApJ, 1000, 90

    Inayoshi, K., Murase, K., & Kashiyama, K. 2026a, ApJ, 1000, 90

  54. [54]

    C., & Haiman, Zolt\'an 2026b, , 1002, 25

    Inayoshi, K., Shangguan, J., Chen, X., Ho, L. C., & Haiman, Zolt\'an 2026b, , 1002, 25

  55. [55]

    Ishibashi, W., & Fabian, A. C. 2015, , 451, 93

    2015

  56. [56]

    R., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Isobe, Y., Juod z balis, I., et al

    Ivey, L. R., D'Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., Isobe, Y., Juod z balis, I., et al. 2026, , submitted (arXiv:2604.09177)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    J., & Branch, D

    Jeffery, D. J., & Branch, D. 1990, Jerusalem Winter School for Theoretical Physics. Supernovae (Teaneck, NJ: Publishing Co., Singapore)

    1990

  58. [58]

    1961, Theory of Probability, 3rd Ed

    Jeffery, H. 1961, Theory of Probability, 3rd Ed. (Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press)

    1961

  59. [59]

    2025, , 544, 3900

    Ji, X., Maiolino, R., \" U bler, H., et al. 2025, , 544, 3900

    2025

  60. [60]

    L., Kocevski, D

    Jones, B. L., Kocevski, D. D., Pacucci, F., Taylor, A. J., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2026, , submitted (arXiv:2510.07376)

    arXiv 2026

  61. [61]

    2024, , 535, 853

    Juod z balis, I., Ji, X., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, , 535, 853

    2024

  62. [62]

    M., et al

    Juod z balis, I., Maiolino, R., Baker, W. M., et al. 2026a, , 546, 86

  63. [63]

    2026b, Nature, 653, 1017

    Juod z balis, I., Marconcini, C., D'Eugenio, F., et al. 2026b, Nature, 653, 1017

  64. [64]

    1999, ASPC, 162, 223

    Kaspi, S., & Netzer, H. 1999, ASPC, 162, 223

    1999

  65. [65]

    C.\ 2007, , 665, 2, 1489

    Kelly, B. C.\ 2007, , 665, 2, 1489

    2007

  66. [66]

    Kido, D., Ioka, K., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Irwin, C. M. 2025, , 544, 3407

    2025

  67. [67]

    2024, A&A, 691, A52

    Killi, M., Watson, D., Brammer, G., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A52

    2024

  68. [68]

    D., Finkelstein, S

    Kocevski, D. D., Finkelstein, S. L., Barro, G., et al. 2025, , 986, 126

    2025

  69. [69]

    M., Faber, S

    Koekemoer, A. M., Faber, S. M., Ferguson, H. C., et al. 2011, , 197, 36

    2011

  70. [70]

    E., et al

    Kokorev, V., Caputi, K., Greene, J. E., et al. 2024, , 968, 38

    2024

  71. [71]

    P., et al

    Kokorev, V., Chisholm, J., Naidu, R. P., et al. 2026, , submitted (arXiv:2511.07515)

    arXiv 2026

  72. [72]

    2025, , 995, 24

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2025, , 995, 24

    2025

  73. [73]

    2013, A&A, 549, A100

    Kollatschny, W., & Zetzl, M. 2013, A&A, 549, A100

    2013

  74. [74]

    2026, A&A, submitted (arXiv:2604.08687)

    Korber, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., et al. 2026, A&A, submitted (arXiv:2604.08687)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  75. [75]

    1997, , 108, 401

    Korista, K., Baldwin, J., Ferland, G., et al. 1997, , 108, 401

    1997

  76. [76]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511

    2013

  77. [77]

    1980, , 43, 305

    Kron, R. 1980, , 43, 305

    1980

  78. [78]

    2018, , 480, 1247

    Kubota, A., & Done, C. 2018, , 480, 1247

    2018

  79. [79]

    2019, , 489, 524

    Kubota, A., & Done, C. 2019, , 489, 524

    2019

  80. [80]

    2024, A&A, 684, A52

    Kuhn, L., Shangguan, J., Davies, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A52

    2024

Showing first 80 references.