pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.04830 · v1 · pith:7BI3N5TTnew · submitted 2026-06-03 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Cosmic variance or galaxy bias? Disentangling finite-volume and galaxy formation effects in cosmological analysis

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 05:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords cosmic variancegalaxy biasBAO shiftEulerian perturbation theoryfinite-volume effectscosmological analysisN-body simulations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cosmic variance in galaxy surveys can be recast as additional bias parameters in perturbation theory to separate it from galaxy formation effects when measuring the BAO scale.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a framework that treats finite-volume cosmic variance effects in galaxy surveys using the language of galaxy biasing. It employs halo and galaxy Eulerian perturbation theory to connect the density field in a specific cosmic realization to the ensemble-averaged one by introducing additional bias parameters. This approach is then used to analyze the non-linear shift of the baryon acoustic oscillation feature, distinguishing contributions from cosmic variance and from galaxy biasing. Validation against cosmological variance-suppressed N-body simulations shows a reduction in the uncertainty associated with the BAO peak position. The work suggests that bias parameter estimation in perturbative methods requires extra caution and proposes strategies to use this formulation in future analyses.

Core claim

By introducing a new set of bias parameters within halo/galaxy Eulerian perturbation theory, the density field from an arbitrary cosmic realization can be related to its ensemble-average counterpart, enabling a description of cosmic variance in terms of galaxy biasing. When applied to the non-linear BAO shift, this disentangles the uncertainty sources, and comparison to variance-suppressed simulations confirms an expected reduction in BAO peak position uncertainty.

What carries the argument

A new set of bias parameters in Eulerian perturbation theory that relate an arbitrary density field realization to the ensemble average.

If this is right

  • The uncertainty on the measured BAO peak position decreases once the new bias parameters are included.
  • Perturbative cosmological analyses that estimate bias parameters must account for possible mixing with cosmic-variance terms.
  • Practical strategies exist to incorporate the reformulated cosmic variance into parameter inference pipelines.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same bias-parameter mapping could be tested on other two-point statistics such as the power spectrum shape beyond the BAO feature.
  • Survey design choices that alter the effective volume might be re-optimized by treating the new parameters as additional degrees of freedom.
  • If the parameters prove stable, they could reduce the need for large numbers of mock catalogs in covariance estimation.

Load-bearing premise

The newly introduced bias parameters remain well-behaved and can be constrained independently of the cosmic-variance effects without the formalism becoming degenerate for realistic survey geometries.

What would settle it

A direct comparison of the scatter in BAO peak position measured from an ensemble of standard simulations versus variance-suppressed simulations, after fitting the new bias parameters, would show whether the claimed uncertainty reduction occurs.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.04830 by Francesco Sinigaglia, Francisco-Shu Kitaura.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Distributions of the BAO peak position measured from the two-point correlation function from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Current and forthcoming galaxy redshift surveys, such as DESI and Euclid, are going to bring cosmological analysis to an unprecedentedly exquisite level of precision in the determination of the cosmological parameters. However, these efforts require a high degree of control over theory and systematics, to obtain unbiased results. In this sense, the cosmic variance associated to finite-volume effects represents a major challenge and should adequately accounted for. In this work, we revisit the definition of cosmic variance and develop a novel framework to describe it using a `galaxy biasing' formalism. In particular, we use halo/galaxy Eulerian perturbation theory to relate the density field from an arbitrary cosmic realization to its counterpart having statistical properties reproducing the ensemble average, introducing a new set of bias parameters. We then apply this idea to the description of the non-linear shift of BAO, disentangling the source of uncertainty from cosmic variance and galaxy biasing associated with the measurement of the BAO scale. We finally check our analytical argument against cosmological variance-suppressed $N$-body simulations, finding an expected reduction in the uncertainty on the BAO peak position. We conclude that extra care should be used when inferring cosmological information from perturbative approaches involving the estimation of bias parameters and propose new practical strategies to optimally leverage the novel formulation of cosmic variance presented herein in cosmological analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a framework that employs halo/galaxy Eulerian perturbation theory to map the density field of an arbitrary cosmic realization onto a counterpart with ensemble-average statistical properties, thereby introducing a new set of bias parameters. This formalism is applied to the nonlinear BAO shift in order to separate contributions from cosmic variance (finite-volume effects) and standard galaxy bias; the approach is checked against variance-suppressed N-body simulations, which reportedly yield a reduction in uncertainty on the BAO peak position.

Significance. If the new parameters prove non-degenerate with the standard bias expansion and survey window, the method could improve control over finite-volume systematics in analyses of DESI and Euclid data. The use of perturbation theory combined with direct simulation validation is a constructive element; however, the practical utility hinges on whether the enlarged parameter space remains identifiable under realistic selection functions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the new bias parameters disentangle cosmic variance from galaxy bias rests on an unshown mapping that relates a single realization to the ensemble average. In a finite-volume survey the only available field is the realization itself, so any effective bias description fitted to it risks absorbing the variance signal it is intended to isolate; no explicit demonstration is given that the parameters remain well-conditioned once realistic masks and selection functions are included.
  2. The validation step against variance-suppressed N-body simulations is cited as showing reduced BAO uncertainty, yet without details on how the new parameters are constrained (e.g., priors, degeneracy tests with standard bias coefficients, or impact of survey geometry) it is impossible to judge whether the reported improvement is robust or an artifact of the idealized mapping.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the number and perturbative order of the newly introduced bias parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications from the paper and indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the new bias parameters disentangle cosmic variance from galaxy bias rests on an unshown mapping that relates a single realization to the ensemble average. In a finite-volume survey the only available field is the realization itself, so any effective bias description fitted to it risks absorbing the variance signal it is intended to isolate; no explicit demonstration is given that the parameters remain well-conditioned once realistic masks and selection functions are included.

    Authors: The mapping is derived in Section 2 of the manuscript using Eulerian perturbation theory for halos/galaxies, explicitly relating the density field of an arbitrary realization to one with ensemble-average properties via the new bias parameters. We agree that the risk of absorption in a single realization is a valid concern and that conditioning under realistic masks is not demonstrated in the current work. We will add a paragraph discussing this limitation and potential mitigation strategies in the revised version. revision: partial

  2. Referee: The validation step against variance-suppressed N-body simulations is cited as showing reduced BAO uncertainty, yet without details on how the new parameters are constrained (e.g., priors, degeneracy tests with standard bias coefficients, or impact of survey geometry) it is impossible to judge whether the reported improvement is robust or an artifact of the idealized mapping.

    Authors: The variance-suppressed simulations are used to isolate the BAO shift contributions as described in Section 4. We will revise the methods and results sections to include explicit details on the fitting procedure, priors for the new parameters, and degeneracy tests with the standard bias expansion. The idealized setup is intentional to test the formalism, but we will note the limitations regarding survey geometry. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Full numerical demonstration of parameter conditioning under realistic survey masks and selection functions, which would require new simulation suites beyond the scope of this study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: new bias parameters introduced as modeling tool, not shown to reduce to input by construction

full rationale

The abstract describes using Eulerian PT to introduce a new set of bias parameters that map an arbitrary realization onto an ensemble-average counterpart, then applying the mapping to separate cosmic-variance and galaxy-bias contributions to the nonlinear BAO shift. No equations are supplied that would demonstrate the new parameters are fitted to the target quantity and then renamed as a prediction, nor is any load-bearing step shown to rest solely on a self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The framework is presented as an independent modeling choice whose validity is checked against variance-suppressed simulations, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of Eulerian perturbation theory applied to finite-volume effects and on the existence of a well-defined mapping between single realizations and ensemble statistics via new bias parameters.

free parameters (1)
  • new set of bias parameters
    Introduced to relate arbitrary cosmic realizations to ensemble-average statistics; their values are not specified in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption halo/galaxy Eulerian perturbation theory is applicable to finite-volume density fields
    Invoked to define the relation between a single realization and the ensemble average.
invented entities (1)
  • new bias parameters for cosmic variance no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode finite-volume effects inside a galaxy-biasing formalism
    Newly postulated quantities whose independent evidence is not provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5767 in / 1353 out tokens · 36655 ms · 2026-06-28T05:01:04.738886+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. HI Simulations for Cosmology with the SKA Observatory

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 2.0

    Overview of HI modeling methods finds consistency in cosmic HI density but systematic differences in HI-halo mass relation shape and redshift evolution.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 19 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    M. Levi, C. Bebek, T. Beers, R. Blum, R. Cahn, D. Eisen- stein, B. Flaugher, K. Honscheid, R. Kron, O. Lahav, P. McDonald, N. Roe, D. Schlegel, and representing the DESI collaboration, The DESI Experiment, a whitepa- per for Snowmass 2013, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:1308.0847 (2013), arXiv:1308.0847 [astro-ph.CO]

  2. [2]

    Amendola, S

    L. Amendola, S. Appleby, A. Avgoustidis, D. Bacon, T. Baker, M. Baldi, N. Bartolo, A. Blanchard, C. Bon- vin, S. Borgani, E. Branchini, C. Burrage, S. Camera, C. Carbone, L. Casarini, M. Cropper, C. de Rham, J. P. Dietrich, C. Di Porto, R. Durrer, A. Ealet, P. G. Ferreira, F. Finelli, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, T. Giannantonio, L. Guzzo, A. Heavens, L. Heisenbe...

  3. [3]

    Braglia, X

    M. Braglia, X. Chen, and A. Loeb, Exotic Dark Matter and the DESI Anomaly, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2507.13925 (2025), arXiv:2507.13925 [astro- ph.CO]

  4. [4]

    Kumar, A

    U. Kumar, A. Ajith, and A. Verma, Evidence for non- cold dark matter from DESI DR2 measurements, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.14419 (2025), arXiv:2504.14419 [astro-ph.CO]

  5. [5]

    Cortˆ es and A

    M. Cortˆ es and A. R. Liddle, Interpreting DESI’s evidence for evolving dark energy, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys. 2024, 007 (2024), arXiv:2404.08056 [astro-ph.CO]

  6. [6]

    Li, P.-J

    T.-N. Li, P.-J. Wu, G.-H. Du, S.-J. Jin, H.-L. Li, J.-F. Zhang, and X. Zhang, Constraints on Interacting Dark Energy Models from the DESI Baryon Acoustic Oscil- lation and DES Supernovae Data, ApJ976, 1 (2024), arXiv:2407.14934 [astro-ph.CO]

  7. [7]

    Zheng, D.-C

    J. Zheng, D.-C. Qiang, and Z.-Q. You, Cosmolog- ical constraints on dark energy models using DESI BAO 2024, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2412.04830 (2024), arXiv:2412.04830 [astro-ph.CO]

  8. [8]

    L. A. Ure˜ na-L´ opez, F. Lozano-Rodr´ ıguez, J. O. Rom´ an- Herrera, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, A. de la Macorra, A. Dey, S. Ferraro, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. G. A. Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, M. Ishak, R. Ke- hoe, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner, A. Lambert, M. Landriau, L. Le Guillou, M. Manera, ...

  9. [9]

    Lodha, A

    K. Lodha, A. Shafieloo, R. Calderon, E. Linder, W. Sohn, J. L. Cervantes-Cota, A. de Mattia, J. Garc´ ıa-Bellido, M. Ishak, W. Matthewson, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, D. Brooks, T. Claybaugh, A. de la Macorra, A. Dey, B. Dey, P. Doel, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. G. A. Gontcho, C. Howlett, S. Juneau, S. Kent, T. Kisner, A. Lambert, M. Landriau, L. Le...

  10. [10]

    Beutler and E

    F. Beutler and E. Di Dio, Modeling relativistic contri- butions to the halo power spectrum dipole, J. Cosmol- ogy Astropart. Phys.2020, 048 (2020), arXiv:2004.08014 [astro-ph.CO]

  11. [11]

    Bonvin, F

    C. Bonvin, F. Lepori, S. Schulz, I. Tutusaus, J. Adamek, and P. Fosalba, A case study for measuring the relativis- tic dipole of a galaxy cross-correlation with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument, MNRAS525, 4611 (2023), arXiv:2306.04213 [astro-ph.CO]

  12. [12]

    Lepori, S

    F. Lepori, S. Schulz, I. Tutusaus, M. A. Breton, S. Saga, C. Viglione, J. Adamek, C. Bonvin, L. Dam, P. Fosalba, L. Amendola, S. Andreon, C. Baccigalupi, M. Baldi, S. Bardelli, D. Bonino, E. Branchini, M. Bres- cia, J. Brinchmann, A. Caillat, S. Camera, V. Capo- bianco, C. Carbone, J. Carretero, S. Casas, M. Castel- lano, G. Castignani, S. Cavuoti, A. Cim...

  13. [13]

    J. R. Bermejo-Climent, R. Demina, A. Krolewski, E. Chaussidon, M. Rezaie, S. Ahlen, S. Bailey, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, T. Claybaugh, A. de la Macorra, A. Dey, P. Doel, G. Farren, S. Ferraro, J. E. Forero-Romero, E. Gazta˜ naga, S. Gontcho A Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, C. Hahn, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, R. Ke- hoe, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner, M. Landriau, L...

  14. [14]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, A. de Mattia, C. Pay- erne, P. McDonald, A. J. Ross, S. Ahlen, D. Bianchi, D. Brooks, E. Burtin, T. Claybaugh, A. de la Ma- corra, P. Doel, S. Ferraro, A. Font-Ribera, J. E. Forero- Romero, E. Gazta˜ naga, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, S. G. A. Gontcho, G. Gutierrez, J. Guy, K. Honscheid, C. Howlett, D. Huterer, R. Kehoe, D. Kirkby, T. Kisner...

  15. [15]

    Abdul-Karim, J

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L. Allen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. Andrade, E. Armengaud, A. Aviles, S. Bai- 9 ley, C. Baltay, P. Bansal, A. Bault, J. Behera, S. Ben- Zvi, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, S. Brieden, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, P...

  16. [16]

    Abdul-Karim, J

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves, A. Anand, U. An- drade, E. Armengaud, A. Aviles, S. Bailey, A. Bault, J. Behera, S. BenZvi, D. Bianchi, C. Blake, A. Brodzeller, D. Brooks, E. Buckley-Geer, E. Burtin, R. Calderon, R. Canning, A. Carnero Rosell, P. Carrilho, L. Casas, F. J. Castander, R. Cereskaite, M. ...

  17. [17]

    Bernardeau, S

    F. Bernardeau, S. Colombi, E. Gazta˜ naga, and R. Scoc- cimarro, Large-scale structure of the Universe and cos- mological perturbation theory, Phys. Rep.367, 1 (2002), arXiv:astro-ph/0112551 [astro-ph]

  18. [18]

    McDonald and A

    P. McDonald and A. Roy, Clustering of dark matter trac- ers: generalizing bias for the coming era of precision LSS, J. Cosmology Astropart. Phys.2009, 020 (2009), arXiv:0902.0991 [astro-ph.CO]

  19. [19]

    K. F. Werner and C. Porciani, Renormalization of lin- ear halo bias in N-body simulations, MNRAS492, 1614 (2020), arXiv:1907.03774 [astro-ph.CO]

  20. [20]

    F. S. Kitaura, A. Balaguera-Antol´ ınez, F. Sinigaglia, and M. Pellejero-Ib´ a˜ nez, The cosmic web connection to the dark matter halo distribution through gravity, MNRAS 512, 2245 (2022), arXiv:2005.11598 [astro-ph.CO]

  21. [21]

    Y. B. Zel’dovich, Gravitational instability: An approxi- mate theory for large density perturbations., A&A5, 84 (1970)

  22. [22]

    B. D. Sherwin and M. Zaldarriaga, Shift of the baryon acoustic oscillation scale: A simple physical picture, Phys. Rev. D85, 103523 (2012), arXiv:1202.3998 [astro- ph.CO]

  23. [23]

    Chuang, G

    C.-H. Chuang, G. Yepes, F.-S. Kitaura, M. Pellejero- Ibanez, S. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, Y. Feng, R. B. Metcalf, R. H. Wechsler, C. Zhao, C.-H. To, S. Alam, A. Banerjee, J. DeRose, C. Giocoli, A. Knebe, and G. Reyes, UNIT project: Universe N-body simulations for the Investiga- tion of Theoretical models from galaxy surveys, MNRAS 487, 48 (2019), arXiv:1811.021...

  24. [24]

    Springel, N

    V. Springel, N. Yoshida, and S. D. M. White, GADGET: a code for collisionless and gasdynamical cosmological simulations, New A6, 79 (2001), arXiv:astro-ph/0003162 [astro-ph]

  25. [25]

    Springel, The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS364, 1105 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0505010 [astro-ph]

    V. Springel, The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2, MNRAS364, 1105 (2005), arXiv:astro- ph/0505010 [astro-ph]

  26. [26]

    Feng, M.-Y

    Y. Feng, M.-Y. Chu, U. Seljak, and P. McDon- ald, FASTPM: a new scheme for fast simulations of dark matter and haloes, MNRAS463, 2273 (2016), 10 arXiv:1603.00476 [astro-ph.CO]

  27. [27]

    X. Xu, N. Padmanabhan, D. J. Eisenstein, K. T. Mehta, and A. J. Cuesta, A 2 per cent distance to z = 0.35 by reconstructing baryon acoustic oscillations - II. Fitting techniques, MNRAS427, 2146 (2012), arXiv:1202.0091 [astro-ph.CO]

  28. [28]

    Vargas-Maga˜ na, S

    M. Vargas-Maga˜ na, S. Ho, X. Xu, A. G. S´ anchez, R. O’Connell, D. J. Eisenstein, A. J. Cuesta, W. J. Per- cival, A. J. Ross, E. Aubourg, J. R. Brownstein, S. Es- coffier, D. Kirkby, M. Manera, D. P. Schneider, J. L. Tin- ker, and B. A. Weaver, The clustering of Galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: po- tential systematics in ...

  29. [29]

    Zhao, C.-H

    C. Zhao, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, Y. Liang, M. Pellejero-Ibanez, C. Tao, M. Vargas-Maga˜ na, A. Variu, and G. Yepes, Improving baryon acoustic oscillation measurement with the combination of cos- mic voids and galaxies, MNRAS491, 4554 (2020), arXiv:1802.03990 [astro-ph.CO]

  30. [30]

    C. Zhao, A. Variu, M. He, D. Forero-S´ anchez, A. Tamone, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, C. Tao, J. Yu, J.-P. Kneib, W. J. Percival, H. Shan, G.-B. Zhao, E. Burtin, K. S. Dawson, G. Rossi, D. P. Schneider, and A. de la Macorra, The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: cosmological implications from multitracer BAO analysis wit...

  31. [31]

    Schmittfull, T

    M. Schmittfull, T. Baldauf, and M. Zaldarriaga, Iterative initial condition reconstruction, Phys. Rev. D96, 023505 (2017), arXiv:1704.06634 [astro-ph.CO]

  32. [32]

    Hada and D

    R. Hada and D. J. Eisenstein, An iterative reconstruction of cosmological initial density fields, MNRAS478, 1866 (2018), arXiv:1804.04738 [astro-ph.CO]

  33. [33]

    F. S. Kitaura, The initial conditions of the universe from constrained simulations., MNRAS429, L84 (2013), arXiv:1203.4184 [astro-ph.CO]

  34. [34]

    Jasche and B

    J. Jasche and B. D. Wandelt, Bayesian physical re- construction of initial conditions from large-scale struc- ture surveys, MNRAS432, 894 (2013), arXiv:1203.3639 [astro-ph.CO]

  35. [35]

    H. Wang, H. J. Mo, X. Yang, and F. C. van den Bosch, Reconstructing the Initial Density Field of the Local Uni- verse: Methods and Tests with Mock Catalogs, ApJ772, 63 (2013), arXiv:1301.1348 [astro-ph.CO]

  36. [36]

    Jasche and G

    J. Jasche and G. Lavaux, Physical Bayesian mod- elling of the non-linear matter distribution: New in- sights into the nearby universe, A&A625, A64 (2019), arXiv:1806.11117 [astro-ph.CO]

  37. [37]

    Kitaura, M

    F.-S. Kitaura, M. Ata, S. A. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, M. Hern´ andez-S´ anchez, A. Balaguera-Antol´ ınez, and G. Yepes, COSMIC BIRTH: efficient Bayesian inference of the evolving cosmic web from galaxy surveys, MNRAS 502, 3456 (2021), arXiv:1911.00284 [astro-ph.CO]

  38. [38]

    Rossell´ o, F

    P. Rossell´ o, F. S. Kitaura, D. Forero-S´ anchez, F. Sinigaglia, and G. Favole, Differentiable Fuzzy Cosmic-Web for Field Level Inference, arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2506.03969 (2025), arXiv:2506.03969 [astro- ph.CO]

  39. [39]

    Klypin, F

    A. Klypin, F. Prada, and J. Byun, Suppressing cos- mic variance with paired-and-fixed cosmological sim- ulations: average properties and covariances of dark matter clustering statistics, MNRAS496, 3862 (2020), arXiv:1903.08518 [astro-ph.CO]

  40. [40]

    Kitaura, C.-H

    F.-S. Kitaura, C.-H. Chuang, Y. Liang, C. Zhao, C. Tao, S. Rodr´ ıguez-Torres, D. J. Eisenstein, H. Gil-Mar´ ın, J.- P. Kneib, C. McBride, W. J. Percival, A. J. Ross, A. G. S´ anchez, J. Tinker, R. Tojeiro, M. Vargas-Magana, and G.-B. Zhao, Signatures of the Primordial Universe from Its Emptiness: Measurement of Baryon Acoustic Oscilla- tions from Minima ...

  41. [41]

    Liang, C

    Y. Liang, C. Zhao, C.-H. Chuang, F.-S. Kitaura, and C. Tao, Measuring baryon acoustic oscillations from the clustering of voids, MNRAS459, 4020 (2016), arXiv:1511.04391 [astro-ph.CO]

  42. [42]

    C. Zhao, C. Tao, Y. Liang, F.-S. Kitaura, and C.- H. Chuang, DIVE in the cosmic web: voids with De- launay triangulation from discrete matter tracer distri- butions, MNRAS459, 2670 (2016), arXiv:1511.04299 [astro-ph.CO]

  43. [43]

    Sinigaglia, F.-S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.-S. Kitaura, K. Nagamine, Y. Oku, and A. Balaguera-Antol´ ınez, Field-level Lyman-αforest mod- eling in redshift space via augmented nonlocal Fluc- tuating Gunn-Peterson Approximation, A&A682, A21 (2024), arXiv:2305.10428 [astro-ph.CO]

  44. [44]

    J. M. Coloma-Nadal, F.-S. Kitaura, J. E. Garc´ ıa-Farieta, F. Sinigaglia, G. Favole, and D. Forero S´ anchez, The hierarchical cosmic web and assembly bias, J. Cosmol- ogy Astropart. Phys.2024, 083 (2024), arXiv:2403.19337 [astro-ph.CO]

  45. [45]

    Sinigaglia, F.-S

    F. Sinigaglia, F.-S. Kitaura, K. Nagamine, and Y. Oku, The Negative Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Shift in the LyαForest from Cosmological Simulations, ApJ971, L22 (2024), arXiv:2407.03918 [astro-ph.CO]