pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05529 · v1 · pith:DET5GG2Znew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

The Double-lined Eclipsing γ Doradus System AX Draconis in a 0.568-day Orbit

Jae Woo Lee , Min-Ji Jeong , Kyeongsoo Hong , Jang-Ho Park , Pakakaew Rittipruk , Hye-Young Kim This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords AX Draconisgamma Doradus pulsatoreclipsing binaryTESS photometryradial velocitysemi-detached systemmass transfer
0
0 comments X

The pith

AX Dra is the shortest-period double-lined eclipsing binary containing a gamma Dor pulsator.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines new spectroscopy with TESS photometry to model AX Dra as a semi-detached binary in a 0.568-day orbit. Radial velocities and light curves yield component masses, radii, and temperatures, after which residual light reveals four independent gamma Dor pulsation frequencies from the primary. These results establish the system as the shortest known of its type and indicate the primary is likely an accretor shaped by mass transfer. A sympathetic reader cares because the case ties close-binary evolution directly to the excitation of pulsations in a star near contact.

Core claim

AX Dra is a semi-detached eclipsing binary with masses 1.717 and 0.804 solar masses and a large primary filling factor of 92 percent; after binary-model subtraction, four frequencies are identified as independent gamma Dor pulsations of the primary via the frequency ratio method, establishing the system as the shortest-period double-lined eclipsing binary with a gamma Dor-type pulsator and implying the pulsating primary is an accretor affected by mass transfer.

What carries the argument

Binary light-curve and radial-velocity modeling combined with frequency analysis of photometric residuals to isolate and identify gamma Dor pulsations using the frequency ratio method.

If this is right

  • AX Dra supplies the first double-lined eclipsing example with a gamma Dor pulsator at an orbital period below one day.
  • The primary's 92 percent filling factor places it near Roche-lobe contact and consistent with ongoing mass transfer.
  • The temperature difference of about 2263 K and luminosity ratio constrain the evolutionary state after mass exchange.
  • Two acceptable pulsation-mode solutions exist for the primary from the frequency ratio method.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Mass accretion may alter the internal structure enough to sustain gamma Dor pulsations in stars that would otherwise be stable.
  • Targeted searches of TESS short-cadence data on other near-contact binaries could uncover additional short-period analogs.
  • Phase-resolved spectroscopy during primary eclipse could directly map the pulsation amplitudes to the primary's surface.

Load-bearing premise

The four frequencies are independent gamma Dor pulsations belonging to the primary component and not artifacts from the binary model or signals from the secondary.

What would settle it

If the frequencies appear in the secondary's radial-velocity curve or if the frequency ratio method yields no consistent mode solutions across multiple datasets, the pulsation identification would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05529 by Hye-Young Kim, Jae Woo Lee, Jang-Ho Park, Kyeongsoo Hong, Min-Ji Jeong, Pakakaew Rittipruk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: TESS observations of AX Dra distributed in BJD (top panel) and orbital phase (second panel). Different colored circles for each sector are individual measures, and the red solid curve represents the model curve obtained with our W-D synthesis. The third and bottom panels show the corresponding residuals from the binary model and from each sector’s mean curve with a phase interval of 0.002, respectively [P… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Variations in magnitude differences with time between four characteristic phases (Max I, Min I, Max II and Min II) for AX Dra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: RV curves of AX Dra with fitted models. The blue and green circles are our measurements for the primary and secondary stars, respectively, and the red solid curves represent the results from a consistent light and RV curve analysis with the W-D code. The gray line in the upper panel denotes the system velocity of −1.5 km s−1 . The lower panel shows the residuals between observations and models [PITH_FULL_… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Selected spectral regions of the primary star AX Dra A. The gray circles are the disentangling spectrum obtained with the FDBinary code. The red lines denote the synthetic spectrum with Teff,1 = 7220 K, log g1 = 4.30, and, v1sini = 120 km s−1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Light curve residuals from the mean curves distributed in BJD. The lower panel presents a short section of the residuals marked using the inset box of the upper panel. The red synthetic curve is computed from the 35-frequency fit to the data between orbital phases 0.13 and 0.87 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: PERIOD04 periodograms for the light curve residuals except for the primary eclipse phase. The first to fourth panels show the amplitude spectra for the residuals in each sector, while the bottom panel is obtained using the entire TESS data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

For the near-contact binary AX Dra, we present the first time-series spectroscopy collected with the echelle spectrograph BOES. From spectral analysis, we measured the projected rotation of $v_1 \sin i$ = $120\pm21$ km s$^{-1}$ and effective temperature of $T_{\rm eff,1}$ = $7220\pm150$ K for the brighter primary component, together with radial velocities (RVs) for both stars. To obtain a consistent binary model, the RV curves were analyzed by combining the 2-min cadence photometric data observed in the TESS sectors 15, 21, 22, and 41. The modeling indicates that AX Dra is a semi-detached system exhibiting a total secondary eclipse, with the detached primary component having a large filling factor of 92 \%. The system has masses of $1.717\pm0.026$ $M_\odot$ and $0.804\pm0.014$ $M_\odot$, radii of $1.541\pm0.020$ $R_\odot$ and $1.237\pm0.014$ $R_\odot$, luminosities of $5.78\pm0.50$ $L_\odot$ and $0.83\pm0.05$ $L_\odot$, and a temperature difference of $\Delta$($T_{\rm eff,1}$--$T_{\rm eff,2}$) = $2263\pm163$ K. Multi-frequency analyses of the TESS residual lights yielded 35 significant signals in the frequency range below 5 day$^{-1}$. Among them, four frequencies of $f_1$, $f_2$, $f_3$, and $f_5$ are independent $\gamma$ Dor pulsations of the primary star, for which two acceptable mode-identification solutions were obtained using the frequency ratio method. These results suggest that AX Dra is the shortest-period double-lined eclipsing binary containing a $\gamma$ Dor-type pulsator and that the pulsating primary is likely an accretor affected by mass transfer.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first BOES echelle spectroscopy of the near-contact eclipsing binary AX Dra together with TESS photometry (sectors 15, 21, 22, 41). It derives double-lined radial velocities, effective temperature and v sin i for the primary, and a consistent semi-detached binary model yielding masses 1.717±0.026 M⊙ and 0.804±0.014 M⊙, radii 1.541±0.020 R⊙ and 1.237±0.014 R⊙, and a 92 % fill factor for the detached primary. Frequency analysis of the TESS residuals identifies 35 signals below 5 d⁻¹, of which four (f1, f2, f3, f5) are interpreted as independent γ Dor g-modes of the primary via the frequency-ratio method; the authors conclude that AX Dra is the shortest-period double-lined eclipsing system containing a γ Dor pulsator and that the primary is likely an accretor undergoing mass transfer.

Significance. If the pulsation identification is robust, the result would establish the shortest-period double-lined eclipsing γ Dor system known, supplying precise dynamical masses and radii that can test the effects of tidal distortion and mass transfer on g-mode pulsations. The combination of double-lined spectroscopy with space-based photometry is a clear strength and yields falsifiable stellar parameters.

major comments (2)
  1. [multi-frequency analyses of the TESS residual lights] The claim that f1, f2, f3, and f5 are independent γ Dor pulsations of the primary after binary-model subtraction is load-bearing for both the shortest-period assertion and the mass-transfer interpretation. The multi-frequency analysis section provides no residual rms, pre-whitening sequence, or power-spectrum comparison before/after subtraction that would demonstrate that low-frequency power (0.1–5 d⁻¹) is free of artifacts from imperfect eclipse, ellipsoidal, or reflection modeling.
  2. [multi-frequency analyses of the TESS residual lights] The frequency-ratio method is stated to yield two acceptable mode-identification solutions, yet the text does not tabulate the observed ratios, the theoretical grid used, or the goodness-of-fit metric that distinguishes the solutions from aliases or secondary-component signals.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract omits any mention of the number of spectra, S/N, or formal error budgets on the derived frequencies and mode identifications.
  2. [frequency analysis] A table listing all 35 detected frequencies together with their amplitudes, S/N, and whether they were attributed to the binary or to pulsation would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. The points raised highlight areas where additional documentation of the frequency analysis would strengthen the presentation. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested details.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The claim that f1, f2, f3, and f5 are independent γ Dor pulsations of the primary after binary-model subtraction is load-bearing for both the shortest-period assertion and the mass-transfer interpretation. The multi-frequency analysis section provides no residual rms, pre-whitening sequence, or power-spectrum comparison before/after subtraction that would demonstrate that low-frequency power (0.1–5 d⁻¹) is free of artifacts from imperfect eclipse, ellipsoidal, or reflection modeling.

    Authors: We agree that explicit documentation of these quantities would better demonstrate the absence of modeling artifacts. The binary model was subtracted using the Wilson-Devinney solution with the derived parameters from the combined RV and TESS photometry fit, after which standard iterative pre-whitening was applied to the residuals with a significance threshold of S/N > 4. To address the concern, the revised manuscript will include: the rms scatter of the post-subtraction residuals, the full pre-whitening sequence with successive amplitude spectra, and a direct comparison of the low-frequency power spectrum before versus after binary-model removal. These additions will confirm that the reported signals (f1, f2, f3, f5) remain after removal of any potential eclipse or ellipsoidal residuals. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The frequency-ratio method is stated to yield two acceptable mode-identification solutions, yet the text does not tabulate the observed ratios, the theoretical grid used, or the goodness-of-fit metric that distinguishes the solutions from aliases or secondary-component signals.

    Authors: The frequency-ratio method compared the observed frequencies against a grid of theoretical γ Dor models that incorporated the primary's mass, radius, effective temperature, and estimated rotation rate, accounting for the effects of tidal distortion. Two solutions were retained on the basis of the smallest residuals between observed and model ratios within the frequency uncertainties. We acknowledge that the current text omits the supporting tabulation. The revised version will add a table containing the observed frequencies and ratios, the parameters of the theoretical grid (mass range, metallicity, overshooting, and rotation), and the goodness-of-fit values (e.g., reduced χ²) for each solution, together with a brief discussion excluding aliases and secondary-component contributions on the basis of the double-lined RV solution and the amplitude ratios. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; all claims rest on direct data reduction

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from observed RVs and TESS photometry to a fitted binary model, residual frequency extraction, and application of the frequency-ratio method to assign modes. No equation or step defines the γ Dor identification or shortest-period claim in terms of the fitted parameters themselves. The frequency-ratio method is invoked as an external technique without self-citation load-bearing. The shortest-period assertion follows from period comparison to literature systems, not from any internal redefinition. This is a standard observational pipeline with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions of binary light-curve modeling and spectral analysis rather than new postulates or free parameters introduced ad hoc by the authors.

free parameters (2)
  • primary effective temperature = 7220 K
    Derived from spectral line fitting with stated uncertainty
  • component masses and radii = 1.717/0.804 M_sun and 1.541/1.237 R_sun
    Obtained from simultaneous RV and photometry solution
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard Roche-geometry and limb-darkening prescriptions in binary modeling codes produce a unique consistent solution when RV and photometry are combined
    Invoked to conclude the semi-detached configuration and 92% filling factor

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5953 in / 1375 out tokens · 52922 ms · 2026-06-28T00:04:38.058541+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    S., Bowman, D

    Antoci, V., Cunha, M. S., Bowman, D. M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 490, 4040, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2787

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2787 2019

  2. [2]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 2075, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz549

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz549 2019

  3. [3]

    2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    Blanco-Cuaresma, S., Soubiran, C., Heiter, U., et al. 2014, A&A, 569, A111, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201423945

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201423945 2014

  4. [4]

    2000, in ASP Conf

    Breger, M. 2000, in ASP Conf. Ser. 210, Delta Scuti and Related Stars, ed. M. Breger, & M. H. Montgomery (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 3

    2000

  5. [5]

    Breger, M., & Bischof, K. M. 2002, A&A, 385, 537, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020124

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020124 2002

  6. [6]

    1993, A&A, 271, 482, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:1993271482 C ¸ akirli,¨O., Hoyman, B., O¨ zdarcan, O., & Bilir, S

    Breger, M., Stich, J., Garrido, R., et al. 1993, A&A, 271, 482, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:1993271482 C ¸ akirli,¨O., Hoyman, B., O¨ zdarcan, O., & Bilir, S. 2025, MNRAS, 533, 2058 doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf330

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:1993271482 1993

  7. [7]

    P., & Castilho, B

    Coelho, P., Barbuy, B., Melendez, J., Sciavon, R. P., & Castilho, B. V. 2005, A&A, 443, 735, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053511

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053511 2005

  8. [8]

    Flower, P. J. 1996, ApJ, 469, 355, doi: 10.1086/177785

    work page doi:10.1086/177785 1996

  9. [9]

    P., Barnes, R., Davenport, J

    Fleming, D. P., Barnes, R., Davenport, J. R. A., & Luger, R. 2019, ApJ, 881, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2ed2

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab2ed2 2019

  10. [10]

    2023, MNRAS, 527, L103, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3053 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari A., Brown A

    Fuller, J., & Felce, C. 2023, MNRAS, 527, L103, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3053 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari A., Brown A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3053 2023

  11. [11]

    Gaulme, P., & Guzik, J. A. 2019, A&A, 630, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935821

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935821 2019

  12. [12]

    O., & Corbally, C

    Gray, R. O., & Corbally, C. J. 1994, AJ, 107, 742, doi: 10.1086/116893

    work page doi:10.1086/116893 1994

  13. [13]

    O., & Corbally, C

    Gray, R. O., & Corbally, C. J. 2009, Stellar Spectral Classification (Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press) Grigahc´ ene, A., Antoci, V., Balona, L., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, L192, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/L192

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/713/2/l192 2009

  14. [14]

    Handler, G., & Shobbrook, R. R. 2002, MNRAS, 333, 251, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05401.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05401.x 2002

  15. [15]

    2015, PhyS, 90, 054010, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/05401

    Heiter, U., Lind, K., Asplund, M., et al. 2015, PhyS, 90, 054010, doi: 10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/05401

    work page doi:10.1088/0031-8949/90/5/05401 2015

  16. [16]

    W., Fekel, F

    Henry, G. W., Fekel, F. C., & Henry, S. M. 2005, AJ, 129, 2815, doi: 10.1086/429876

    work page doi:10.1086/429876 2005

  17. [17]

    2025, ApJ, 990, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf10d Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V

    Hobson-Ritz, M., Birky, J., Peterson, L., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adf10d Høg, E., Fabricius, C., Makarov, V. V., et al. 2000, A&A, 355, 27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020249

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adf10d 2025

  18. [18]

    W., Kim, S.-L., et al

    Hong, K., Lee, J. W., Kim, S.-L., et al. 2015, AJ, 150, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/131 Iliji´ c, S., Hensberge, H., Pavlovski, K., &

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/150/4/131 2015

  19. [19]

    Freyhammer, L. M. 2004, in ASP Conf. Ser. 318, Spectroscopically and Spatially Resolving the Components of the Close Binary Stars, ed. R. Hilditch, H. Hensberge, & K. Pavlovski (San Francisco: ASP), 111

    2004

  20. [20]

    Ibanoglu, C., C ¸ akirli,¨O., & Sipahi, E., 2018, New Astron., 62, 70, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2018.01.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2018.01.004 2018

  21. [21]

    I., Lee, J

    Kim, H. I., Lee, J. W., Kim, C. H., et al. 2004, PASP, 116, 931, doi: 10.1086/425606

    work page doi:10.1086/425606 2004

  22. [22]

    G., et al

    Kim, K.-M., Han, I., Valyavin, G. G., et al. 2007, PASP, 119, 1052, doi: 10.1086/521959

    work page doi:10.1086/521959 2007

  23. [23]

    1955, Kl

    Kippenhahn, R. 1955, Kl. Ver¨ off

    1955

  24. [24]

    2021, A&A, 653, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039369

    Koenigsberger, G., Moreno, E., & Langer, N. 2021, A&A, 653, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039369

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039369 2021

  25. [25]

    Kurtz, D. W. 2022, ARAA, 60, 31, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094232

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094232 2022

  26. [26]

    Kurucz, R. L. 2005, MSAIS, 8, 14

    2005

  27. [27]

    K., & Van Woerden, H

    Kwee, K. K., & Van Woerden, H. 1956, Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 12, 327

    1956

  28. [28]

    Lee, J. W. 2016, ApJ, 833, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/170

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/170 2016

  29. [29]

    W., & Park, J.-H

    Lee, J. W., & Park, J.-H. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4693, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2153

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2153 2018

  30. [30]

    W., Hong, K., & Kim, H.-Y

    Lee, J. W., Hong, K., & Kim, H.-Y. 2021, AJ, 161, 129, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd631

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/abd631 2021

  31. [31]

    W., Hong, K., Kim, H.-Y., & Park, J.-H

    Lee, J. W., Hong, K., Kim, H.-Y., & Park, J.-H. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 4702, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2151

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2151 2022

  32. [32]

    W., Hong, K., Koo, J.-R., & Park J.-H., 2018, AJ, 155, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa947e

    Lee, J. W., Hong, K., Koo, J.-R., & Park J.-H., 2018, AJ, 155, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa947e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa947e 2018

  33. [33]

    2023, AJ, 165, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acbe9d 9

    Kim, D.-J. 2023, AJ, 165, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acbe9d 9

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/acbe9d 2023

  34. [34]

    2014, AJ, 148, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/2/37

    Koo, J.-R. 2014, AJ, 148, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/148/2/37

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-6256/148/2/37 2014

  35. [35]

    W., Kristiansen, M., & Hong, K

    Lee, J. W., Kristiansen, M., & Hong, K. 2019, AJ, 157, 223, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab1a3b

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ab1a3b 2019

  36. [36]

    2005, Comm

    Lenz, P., & Breger, M. 2005, Comm. Asteroseismology, 146, 53, doi: 10.1553/cia146s53

    work page doi:10.1553/cia146s53 2005

  37. [37]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 4363, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2266

    Li, G., Guo, Z., Fuller, J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4363, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2266

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2266 2020

  38. [38]

    L., & Deeming, T

    Loumos, G. L., & Deeming, T. J. 1978, Ap&SS, 56, 285, doi: 10.1007/BF01879560

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01879560 1978

  39. [39]

    C., Vyhmeister, K., Hawley, S

    Lurie, J. C., Vyhmeister, K., Hawley, S. L., et al. 2017, AJ, 154, 250, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aa974d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/aa974d 2017

  40. [40]

    C., Amado P

    Moya, A., Su´ arez, J. C., Amado P. J., et al. 2005, A&A, 432, 189, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20041752

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20041752 2005

  41. [41]

    G., Collins, K

    Paegert, M., Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., et al. 2022, VizieR Online Data Catalog, IV/39

    2022

  42. [42]

    Intrinsic Colors, Temperatures, and Bolometric Corrections of Pre-Main Sequence Stars

    Pecaut, M. J., & Mamajek, E. E. 2013, ApJS, 208, 9, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/9 2013

  43. [43]

    2017, ApJ, 842, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff7

    Pilecki, B., Gieren, W., Smolec, S., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa6ff7 2017

  44. [44]

    W., et al

    Rittipruk, P., Hong, K., Lee, J. W., et al. 2025, AJ, 169, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad99ce

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ad99ce 2025

  45. [45]

    Determination of broadening functions using the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) technique

    Rucinski, S. 1999, in ASP Conf. Ser. 185, Precise Stellar Radial Velocities, ed. J. B. Hearnshaw & C. D. Scarfe (San Francisco, CA: ASP), 82, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9807327

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9807327 1999

  46. [46]

    Rucinski, S. M. 1992, AJ, 104, 1968, doi: 10.1086/181071

    work page doi:10.1086/181071 1992

  47. [47]

    Rucinski, S. M. 2002, AJ, 124, 1746, doi: 10.1086/342342

    work page doi:10.1086/342342 2002

  48. [48]

    Rasio, F. A. 2007, ApJ, 667, 1170, doi: 10.1086/520911

    work page doi:10.1086/520911 2007

  49. [49]

    Rasio, F. A. 2010, ApJ, 724, 546, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/546

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/724/1/546 2010

  50. [50]

    Southworth, J., & Bowman, D. M. 2022, The Observatory, 142, 161, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2205.08841

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.08841 2022

  51. [51]

    Southworth, J., & Van Reeth, T., 2022, MNRAS, 515, 2755, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1993

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1993 2022

  52. [52]

    1961, Ver¨ off

    Strohmeier, W., & Knigge, R. 1961, Ver¨ off

    1961

  53. [53]

    Formation and Evolution of Compact Stellar X-ray Sources

    Tauris, T. M., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 2006, in in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press), 623 doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0303456

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0303456 2006

  54. [54]

    2010, A&A Rv, 18, 67, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1 van der Walt, S., Colbert, S

    Torres, G., Andersen, J., & Gim´ enez, A. 2010, A&AR, 18, 67, doi: 10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-009-0025-1 2010

  55. [55]

    2011, A&A, 534, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117368 Van Hamme, W

    Uytterhoeven, K., Moya, A., Grigahc´ ene, A., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A125, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117368 Van Hamme, W. 1993, AJ, 106, 209, doi: 10.1086/116788 Van Hamme, W., & Wilson, R. E. 2007, ApJ, 661, 1129, doi: 10.1086/517870

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201117368 2011

  56. [56]

    E., & Devinney, E

    Wilson, R. E., & Devinney, E. J. 1971, ApJ, 166, 605, doi: 10.1086/150986

    work page doi:10.1086/150986 1971

  57. [57]

    R., Deng, L., Zhang, C., et al

    Xiong, D. R., Deng, L., Zhang, C., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 3163, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw047

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw047 2016

  58. [58]

    B., Luo, C

    Zhang, X. B., Luo, C. Q., & Fu, J. N. 2013, ApJ, 777, 77, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/77 10 BJD - 2457000 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 Magnitude (Tp) 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 11.6 S15 S21-22 S41 Magnitude (Tp) 10.6 10.8 11.0 11.2 11.4 11.6 Residual (mag) -0.04 0.00 0.04 Phase -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 -0.04 0.00 0.04 Binary model Mean ...

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/777/1/77 2013