Non-projective complete log canonical surfaces
Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:43 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
Non-projective complete log canonical surfaces with semi-ample canonical divisors exist for every non-negative Kodaira dimension.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We construct non-projective complete log canonical algebraic surfaces whose canonical divisors are semi-ample over an algebraically closed field of any characteristic other than the algebraic closure of a finite field. We provide a unified framework to construct such surfaces for any given non-negative Kodaira dimension, namely, zero, one, or two. Furthermore, we show that any complete log canonical algebraic surface with Kodaira dimension minus infinity is automatically projective.
What carries the argument
A unified framework that produces complete log canonical surfaces with semi-ample canonical divisor while deliberately avoiding projectivity for each non-negative Kodaira dimension.
If this is right
- Non-projective examples exist for Kodaira dimensions zero, one, and two in all allowed characteristics.
- Projectivity is forced exactly when Kodaira dimension equals minus infinity.
- The constructions cover every possible Kodaira dimension value for non-projective complete log canonical surfaces.
- The same surfaces have semi-ample canonical divisors.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The projectivity theorem may extend to related classes of surfaces with milder singularities.
- Similar non-projective examples could appear in higher dimensions once analogous frameworks are found.
- The characteristic restriction suggests that finite-field phenomena may force projectivity in special cases.
Load-bearing premise
Such surfaces can be built without the characteristic or field condition forcing projectivity when the Kodaira dimension is non-negative.
What would settle it
Either a complete log canonical algebraic surface with Kodaira dimension minus infinity that is non-projective, or the inability to produce the required non-projective examples for one of the non-negative Kodaira dimensions in an allowed characteristic.
read the original abstract
We construct non-projective complete log canonical algebraic surfaces whose canonical divisors are semi-ample over an algebraically closed field of any characteristic other than the algebraic closure of a finite field. We provide a unified framework to construct such surfaces for any given non-negative Kodaira dimension, namely, zero, one, or two. Furthermore, we show that any complete log canonical algebraic surface with Kodaira dimension minus infinity is automatically projective. This projectivity result confirms that our construction covers all possible values for the Kodaira dimension of non-projective complete log canonical surfaces.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper constructs non-projective complete log canonical algebraic surfaces with semi-ample canonical divisors over algebraically closed fields of characteristic not equal to the algebraic closure of a finite field, for each Kodaira dimension κ=0,1,2 via a unified framework. It additionally proves that every complete log canonical surface with κ=-∞ is projective, thereby showing that the constructions cover all possible Kodaira dimensions for non-projective examples.
Significance. If the constructions and projectivity theorem hold, the work supplies explicit examples realizing non-projective lc surfaces in every non-negative Kodaira dimension and establishes a clean projectivity criterion for the remaining case. This completes the Kodaira-dimension picture for non-projective lc surfaces and supplies a unified method that may be useful for further classification questions in the minimal model program.
minor comments (3)
- The abstract states the characteristic restriction but does not indicate whether the constructions rely on any specific vanishing theorems or base-change arguments that might fail in positive characteristic; a brief remark in the introduction clarifying the characteristic dependence would help readers.
- Notation for the unified framework (e.g., the parameters or gluing data used to produce the surfaces for each κ) should be introduced consistently in §2 or §3 so that the three cases can be compared directly.
- The projectivity theorem for κ=-∞ is stated without an explicit reference to the relevant vanishing or contraction criterion used in its proof; adding a pointer to the standard result (e.g., Kawamata-Viehweg vanishing or the contraction theorem) would improve readability.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of the manuscript. The recommendation for minor revision is noted. No specific major comments were provided in the report, so we have no points requiring detailed rebuttal at this stage. We will incorporate any minor suggestions during revision.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The paper's central results consist of explicit constructions of non-projective log canonical surfaces with semi-ample canonical divisors for each non-negative Kodaira dimension, together with a separate projectivity theorem when κ = −∞. These are presented as new geometric constructions resting on standard log canonical surface theory over algebraically closed fields (excluding algebraic closures of finite fields). No equations, definitions, or self-citations are shown to reduce the claimed existence or projectivity statements to quantities defined in terms of themselves or to prior fitted parameters from the same authors. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks in algebraic geometry.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption The base field is algebraically closed of characteristic other than the algebraic closure of a finite field.
- standard math Standard results on log canonical pairs and the minimal model program for surfaces remain valid in the given characteristic range.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Schr\"oer, Stefan , TITLE =. Manuscripta Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1999 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s002290050203 , URL =
-
[2]
2007 , PAGES =
Koll\'ar, J\'anos , TITLE =. 2007 , PAGES =
2007
-
[3]
Koll\'ar, J\'anos and Mori, Shigefumi , TITLE =. 1998 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511662560 , URL =
-
[4]
1977 , PAGES =
Hartshorne, Robin , TITLE =. 1977 , PAGES =
1977
-
[5]
Fujino, Osamu , TITLE =. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2012 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2977/PRIMS/71 , URL =
-
[6]
Fujino, Osamu , TITLE =. Nagoya Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/nmj.2020.14 , URL =
-
[7]
Goodman, Jacob Eli , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 1969 , PAGES =. doi:10.2307/1970814 , URL =
-
[8]
Tanaka, Hiromu , TITLE =. Nagoya Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2014 , PAGES =. doi:10.1215/00277630-2801646 , URL =
- [9]
-
[10]
Fujino, Osamu , TITLE =. Taiwanese J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.11650/tjm/210102 , URL =
-
[11]
Illinois J
Nagata, Masayoshi , TITLE =. Illinois J. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 1958 , PAGES =
1958
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.