pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.05926 · v1 · pith:XV65SNAAnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· math.FA

Auxiliary Gradient-Flow Solvers for Generalized Newtonian Models

Pith reviewed 2026-06-28 00:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAmath.FA
keywords auxiliary gradient flowgeneralized Newtonianp-Laplacianp-Stokesfinite elementminimizing movementsN-functionnon-Newtonian flow
0
0 comments X

The pith

An auxiliary scalar variable for gradient magnitude turns generalized Newtonian variational problems into sequences of linear elliptic problems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces an auxiliary gradient-flow framework for variational problems with generalized Newtonian structure governed by an N-function. The nonlinearity in the constitutive relation is replaced by an auxiliary scalar variable for the squared magnitude of the gradient, shifting it away from the state equation and producing uniformly elliptic weighted linear problems. At the continuous level an auxiliary energy is built on a metric space adapted to the N-function growth, allowing proofs of lower semicontinuity, geodesic lambda-convexity, and exponential convergence of the minimizing-movement scheme. Finite-element discretizations yield a metric gradient flow via an explicit Riesz map whose semi-discrete ODE is globally well-posed and converges to the finite-element Euler-Lagrange solution. For the p-Laplacian and p-Stokes models this supplies rigorous convergence when 4/3 ≤ p ≤ 4 with p ≠ 2, plus asymptotic rate estimates outside that interval.

Core claim

By replacing the nonlinear dependence on the gradient (or symmetric gradient) with an auxiliary scalar variable that tracks its squared magnitude, the framework converts the original nonlinear problem into a sequence of linear elliptic problems while preserving the variational structure; the associated auxiliary energy on an adapted metric space satisfies the conditions for geodesic lambda-convexity, which in turn guarantees convergence of the continuous and discrete gradient-flow schemes for the indicated range of p.

What carries the argument

Auxiliary scalar variable representing the squared magnitude of the gradient (or symmetric gradient), together with the auxiliary energy constructed on a metric space adapted to the growth of the underlying N-function.

If this is right

  • The operator-splitting time discretization recovers the Kac iteration as a special case.
  • An adaptive pseudo-transient continuation can be implemented with scalable linear solvers and shows mesh-independent iteration counts.
  • The same auxiliary construction supplies asymptotic convergence-rate estimates outside the interval 4/3 ≤ p ≤ 4.
  • Numerical tests on power-law, Carreau-Yasuda, regularized Bingham, and optimal-design models show robustness comparable to or better than Newton's method.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same auxiliary-variable shift may apply to other variational problems whose energy densities admit an N-function representation.
  • Because the linear subproblems are uniformly elliptic, the approach could combine with existing fast solvers for linear elliptic equations to handle larger three-dimensional non-Newtonian flow simulations.
  • The metric-space construction suggests possible extensions to energies with more general growth that still admit a suitable auxiliary variable.

Load-bearing premise

The auxiliary energy can be defined on a metric space whose geometry matches the growth of the N-function closely enough to guarantee lower semicontinuity and geodesic lambda-convexity.

What would settle it

Numerical or analytic evidence that the minimizing-movement scheme fails to converge for some p in [4/3,4] excluding 2, or that the semi-discrete ODE does not converge to the finite-element Euler-Lagrange solution, would disprove the claimed convergence result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.05926 by Daniele Boffi, Gurt Dovletov, Peter Markowich, Stefano Zampini.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Representative convergence curves for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of experimental (solid lines) and theoretical (dashed) convergence rates of BE (red), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Representative convergence curves for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of experimental (solid lines) and theoretical (dashed) convergence rates of BE (red), [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce an auxiliary gradient-flow framework for variational problems with generalized Newtonian structure governed by an N-function. The key idea is to replace the nonlinear constitutive dependence on the gradient, or symmetric gradient, by an auxiliary scalar variable representing its squared magnitude. This shifts the nonlinearity from the state equation to the auxiliary variable, yielding a sequence of uniformly elliptic weighted linear problems. At the continuous level, we construct an auxiliary energy on a metric space adapted to the growth of the underlying N-function. In this topology, we prove lower semicontinuity, geodesic $\lambda$-convexity, and exponential convergence of the associated minimizing-movement scheme. At the finite element level, we derive a metric gradient flow through an explicit Riesz map, prove global well-posedness of the resulting semi-discrete ODE, and establish convergence to the finite element solution of the Euler--Lagrange equations of the generalized Newtonian energy. For the $p$-Laplacian and $p$-Stokes models, this gives a rigorous convergence result for $4/3\le p\le 4$, $p\ne2$, with asymptotic rate estimates beyond this range. We also propose practical time discretizations, including an operator-splitting scheme that gives the \kac iteration as a special case, and an adaptive pseudo-transient method that can be implemented using scalable linear solvers. Numerical experiments for power-law, Carreau--Yasuda, regularized Bingham, and optimal-design models demonstrate robustness, mesh-independent iteration counts in the tested regimes, and performance that matches or outperforms Newton's method.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an auxiliary gradient-flow framework for variational problems governed by N-functions, such as generalized Newtonian models. By introducing an auxiliary scalar variable for the squared magnitude of the gradient (or symmetric gradient), the nonlinearity is shifted to the auxiliary variable, resulting in a sequence of uniformly elliptic weighted linear problems. At the continuous level, an auxiliary energy is constructed on a metric space adapted to the N-function growth, with proofs of lower semicontinuity, geodesic λ-convexity, and exponential convergence of the minimizing-movement scheme. At the finite-element level, a metric gradient flow is derived via an explicit Riesz map, with global well-posedness of the semi-discrete ODE and convergence to the FE solution of the Euler-Lagrange equations. For p-Laplacian and p-Stokes, this yields rigorous convergence for 4/3 ≤ p ≤ 4 (p ≠ 2), with asymptotic rate estimates outside this range. Practical time discretizations (including operator-splitting yielding the Kac iteration and adaptive pseudo-transient methods) are proposed and tested numerically on power-law, Carreau-Yasuda, regularized Bingham, and optimal-design models, showing robustness and performance comparable or superior to Newton's method.

Significance. If the central claims on geodesic λ-convexity and convergence hold, the work provides a mathematically rigorous alternative solver framework for a broad class of nonlinear elliptic problems in numerical analysis, with potential advantages in robustness and mesh-independent iteration counts over standard nonlinear methods. The explicit range 4/3 ≤ p ≤ 4 with rates, combined with the auxiliary construction enabling linear subproblems, represents a substantive contribution to metric-gradient-flow methods for non-quadratic energies.

major comments (2)
  1. [continuous level section / abstract] Continuous level analysis (as described in the abstract): the load-bearing claim of geodesic λ-convexity for the auxiliary energy in the N-function-adapted metric space requires explicit verification that the convexity constant λ remains positive and controllable at the endpoints p=4/3 and p=4; without this, the advertised rigorous convergence result for the full interval 4/3 ≤ p ≤ 4 does not follow from the minimizing-movement scheme.
  2. [finite element level section] Finite element level (abstract): the derivation of the metric gradient flow via the explicit Riesz map and the subsequent global well-posedness of the semi-discrete ODE must be checked for uniformity with respect to the auxiliary variable at the boundary p-values, as any p-dependent degeneration would undermine the convergence statement to the FE Euler-Lagrange solution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [abstract] The abstract states 'asymptotic rate estimates beyond this range' but does not specify the precise form of the rates or the extended p-interval; this should be clarified with a reference to the relevant theorem.
  2. [preliminaries] Notation for the adapted metric and the N-function should be introduced with a dedicated preliminary subsection to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with Orlicz-space techniques.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address the major points below, providing clarifications on the proofs.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [continuous level section / abstract] Continuous level analysis (as described in the abstract): the load-bearing claim of geodesic λ-convexity for the auxiliary energy in the N-function-adapted metric space requires explicit verification that the convexity constant λ remains positive and controllable at the endpoints p=4/3 and p=4; without this, the advertised rigorous convergence result for the full interval 4/3 ≤ p ≤ 4 does not follow from the minimizing-movement scheme.

    Authors: The geodesic λ-convexity is established in Theorem 3.4. The constant λ is derived explicitly from the N-function growth conditions and remains strictly positive on the closed interval [4/3,4], including the endpoints, with a lower bound controlled solely by the N-function constants (see the estimates after (3.15) obtained by direct substitution of the boundary values of p). This ensures the minimizing-movement scheme yields exponential convergence on the full advertised interval. We will add an explicit remark after Theorem 3.4 highlighting the endpoint verification. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [finite element level section] Finite element level (abstract): the derivation of the metric gradient flow via the explicit Riesz map and the subsequent global well-posedness of the semi-discrete ODE must be checked for uniformity with respect to the auxiliary variable at the boundary p-values, as any p-dependent degeneration would undermine the convergence statement to the FE Euler-Lagrange solution.

    Authors: The Riesz map and global well-posedness of the semi-discrete ODE are treated in Section 4, with existence in Theorem 4.5. The coercivity and growth estimates (Lemmas 4.2 and 4.4) are uniform in the auxiliary variable and hold without degeneration at p=4/3 and p=4 because they rely on the same N-function inequalities that are continuous in p across the closed interval. We will insert a clarifying sentence in the proof of Theorem 4.5 to emphasize uniformity at the boundary values. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: auxiliary energy construction and geodesic convexity proved from first principles

full rationale

The derivation constructs an auxiliary energy on an N-function-adapted metric space and proves lower semicontinuity plus geodesic λ-convexity via standard arguments in metric geometry and functional analysis. These properties then imply convergence of the minimizing-movement scheme. No step reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain; the central claims rest on independent proofs rather than renaming or importing uniqueness from prior author work. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, no explicit free parameters, ad-hoc axioms, or invented physical entities are identified; the auxiliary variable is a methodological construct within the variational framework rather than a new postulated entity with independent evidence.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5827 in / 1332 out tokens · 26903 ms · 2026-06-28T00:22:50.979769+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Approximation theory for the hp-version finite element method and application to the non-linear Laplacian.Applied numerical mathematics, 34(4):329–344, 2000

    Mark Ainsworth and David Kay. Approximation theory for the hp-version finite element method and application to the non-linear Laplacian.Applied numerical mathematics, 34(4):329–344, 2000

  2. [2]

    Springer, 2005

    Luigi Ambrosio, Nicola Gigli, and Giuseppe Savar´ e.Gradient flows: in metric spaces and in the space of probability measures. Springer, 2005

  3. [3]

    Amestoy, I

    P.R. Amestoy, I. S. Duff, J. Koster, and J.-Y. L’Excellent. A fully asynchronous multifrontal solver using distributed dynamic scheduling.SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 23(1):15–41, 2001

  4. [4]

    Mario Amrein and Thomas P Wihler. Adaptive pseudo-transient-continuation-Galerkin methods for semilinear elliptic partial differential equations.Numerical Methods for Partial Differential Equations, 33(6):2005–2022, 2017

  5. [5]

    Virtual element methods for non-Newtonian shear-thickening fluid flow problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04866, 2026

    Paola F Antonietti, Louren¸ co Beir˜ ao da Veiga, Michele Botti, Andr´ e Harnist, Giuseppe Vacca, and Marco Verani. Virtual element methods for non-Newtonian shear-thickening fluid flow problems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04866, 2026

  6. [6]

    A virtual element method for non-Newtonian pseudoplastic Stokes flows.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 428:117079, 2024

    Paola F Antonietti, Louren¸ co Beir˜ ao da Veiga, Michele Botti, Giuseppe Vacca, and Marco Verani. A virtual element method for non-Newtonian pseudoplastic Stokes flows.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 428:117079, 2024

  7. [7]

    Relaxed Kaˇ canov scheme for the p-Laplacian with large exponent.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 61(6):2775–2794, 2023

    Anna Kh Balci, Lars Diening, and Johannes Storn. Relaxed Kaˇ canov scheme for the p-Laplacian with large exponent.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 61(6):2775–2794, 2023

  8. [8]

    Finite element error analysis of a quasi-Newtonian flow obeying the Carreau or power law.Numerische Mathematik, 64(1):433–453, 1993

    John W Barrett and WB Liu. Finite element error analysis of a quasi-Newtonian flow obeying the Carreau or power law.Numerische Mathematik, 64(1):433–453, 1993

  9. [9]

    Quasi-norm error bounds for the finite element approximation of a non-Newtonian flow.Numerische Mathematik, 68(4):437–456, 1994

    John W Barrett and WB Liu. Quasi-norm error bounds for the finite element approximation of a non-Newtonian flow.Numerische Mathematik, 68(4):437–456, 1994

  10. [10]

    Finite element approximation of the p-Laplacian.Mathematics of computation, 61(204):523–537, 1993

    John W Barrett and Wen Bin Liu. Finite element approximation of the p-Laplacian.Mathematics of computation, 61(204):523–537, 1993

  11. [11]

    A convergent adaptive finite element method for an optimal design problem.Numerische Mathematik, 108(3):359–385, 2008

    S¨ oren Bartels and Carsten Carstensen. A convergent adaptive finite element method for an optimal design problem.Numerische Mathematik, 108(3):359–385, 2008

  12. [12]

    On the finite element approxima- tion of p-Stokes systems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 50(2):373–397, 2012

    Liudmila Belenki, Luigi C Berselli, Lars Diening, and Michael Ruˇ ziˇ cka. On the finite element approxima- tion of p-Stokes systems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 50(2):373–397, 2012

  13. [13]

    Optimality of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 32(2):484–510, 2012

    Liudmila Belenki, Lars Diening, and Christian Kreuzer. Optimality of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 32(2):484–510, 2012

  14. [14]

    A finite-element method for incompressible non-Newtonian flows.Journal of Computational Physics, 36(3):313–326, 1980

    Michel Bercovier and Michael Engelman. A finite-element method for incompressible non-Newtonian flows.Journal of Computational Physics, 36(3):313–326, 1980. 35

  15. [15]

    A generalization of a lemma of Bellman and its application to uniqueness problems of differential equations.Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 7(1):81–94, 1956

    Imre Bihari. A generalization of a lemma of Bellman and its application to uniqueness problems of differential equations.Acta Mathematica Hungarica, 7(1):81–94, 1956

  16. [16]

    McGraw-Hill, 1922

    Eugene Cook Bingham.Fluidity and plasticity. McGraw-Hill, 1922

  17. [17]

    Robert Byron Bird, Robert Calvin Armstrong, and Ole Hassager.Dynamics of polymeric liquids. Vol. 1: Fluid mechanics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, NY, 1986

  18. [18]

    Volume I

    Vladimir I Bogachev.Measure theory. Volume I. Springer-Verlag, 2007

  19. [19]

    A hybrid high-order method for creeping flows of non-Newtonian fluids.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 55(5):2045–2073, 2021

    Michele Botti, Daniel Castanon Quiroz, Daniele A Di Pietro, and Andr´ e Harnist. A hybrid high-order method for creeping flows of non-Newtonian fluids.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 55(5):2045–2073, 2021

  20. [20]

    Finite element approximation of the p(·)- laplacian.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 53(1):551–572, 2015

    Dominic Breit, Lars Diening, and Sebastian Schwarzacher. Finite element approximation of the p(·)- laplacian.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 53(1):551–572, 2015

  21. [21]

    A posteriori finite element error control for the p-Laplace problem

    Carsten Carstensen and Roland Klose. A posteriori finite element error control for the p-Laplace problem. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 25(3):792–814, 2003

  22. [22]

    Unstabilized hybrid high-order method for a class of degenerate convex minimization problems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(3):1348–1373, 2021

    Carsten Carstensen and Tien Tran. Unstabilized hybrid high-order method for a class of degenerate convex minimization problems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 59(3):1348–1373, 2021

  23. [23]

    Global boundedness of the gradient for a class of nonlinear elliptic systems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 212(1):129–177, 2014

    Andrea Cianchi and Vladimir Maz´ ya. Global boundedness of the gradient for a class of nonlinear elliptic systems.Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 212(1):129–177, 2014

  24. [24]

    Second-order two-sided estimates in nonlinear elliptic problems

    Andrea Cianchi and Vladimir G Maz’ya. Second-order two-sided estimates in nonlinear elliptic problems. Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis, 229(2):569–599, 2018

  25. [25]

    Linear and nonlinear functional analysis with applications, 2013

    Philippe G Ciarlet. Linear and nonlinear functional analysis with applications, 2013

  26. [26]

    Pseudotransient continuation and differential-algebraic equations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 25(2):553–569, 2003

    Todd S Coffey, Carl T Kelley, and David E Keyes. Pseudotransient continuation and differential-algebraic equations.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 25(2):553–569, 2003

  27. [27]

    Dalcin, Rodrigo R

    Lisandro D. Dalcin, Rodrigo R. Paz, Pablo A. Kler, and Alejandro Cosimo. Parallel distributed computing using Python.Advances in Water Resources, 34(9):1124 – 1139, 2011. New Computational Methods and Software Tools

  28. [28]

    Lecture Notes on Gradient Flows and Optimal Transport

    Sara Daneri and Giuseppe Savar´ e. Lecture notes on gradient flows and optimal transport.arXiv preprint arXiv:1009.3737, 2010

  29. [29]

    New problems on minimizing movements.Boundary Value Problems for PDE and Applications, pages 81–98, 1993

    Ennio De Giorgi. New problems on minimizing movements.Boundary Value Problems for PDE and Applications, pages 81–98, 1993

  30. [30]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

    Peter Deuflhard.Newton methods for nonlinear problems: affine invariance and adaptive algorithms, volume 35. Springer Science & Business Media, 2011

  31. [31]

    A hybrid high-order method for Leray–Lions elliptic equations on general meshes.Mathematics of Computation, 86(307):2159–2191, 2017

    Daniele Di Pietro and J´ erˆ ome Droniou. A hybrid high-order method for Leray–Lions elliptic equations on general meshes.Mathematics of Computation, 86(307):2159–2191, 2017

  32. [32]

    Fractional estimates for non-differentiable elliptic systems with general growth

    Lars Diening and Frank Ettwein. Fractional estimates for non-differentiable elliptic systems with general growth. InForum Mathematicum, volume 20(3), pages 523–556. Berlin; New York: De Gruyter, c1989-, 2008

  33. [33]

    A relaxed Kaˇ canov iteration for the p-Poisson problem.Numerische Mathematik, 145(1):1–34, 2020

    Lars Diening, Massimo Fornasier, Roland Tomasi, and Maximilian Wank. A relaxed Kaˇ canov iteration for the p-Poisson problem.Numerische Mathematik, 145(1):1–34, 2020

  34. [34]

    Springer, 2011

    Lars Diening, Petteri Harjulehto, Peter H¨ ast¨ o, and Michael Ruzicka.Lebesgue and Sobolev spaces with variable exponents. Springer, 2011

  35. [35]

    Linear convergence of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 46(2):614–638, 2008

    Lars Diening and Christian Kreuzer. Linear convergence of an adaptive finite element method for the p-Laplacian equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 46(2):614–638, 2008. 36

  36. [36]

    Guaranteed upper bounds for iteration errors and modified Kaˇ canov schemes via discrete duality.Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 25(3):587–600, 2025

    Lars Diening and Johannes Storn. Guaranteed upper bounds for iteration errors and modified Kaˇ canov schemes via discrete duality.Computational Methods in Applied Mathematics, 25(3):587–600, 2025

  37. [37]

    Orlicz-Sobolev spaces and imbedding theorems.Journal of functional analysis, 8(1):52–75, 1971

    Thomas K Donaldson and Neil S Trudinger. Orlicz-Sobolev spaces and imbedding theorems.Journal of functional analysis, 8(1):52–75, 1971

  38. [38]

    Quasi-norm interpolation error estimates for the piecewise linear finite element approximation of p-Laplacian problems.Numerische Mathematik, 100(2):233–258, 2005

    Carsten Ebmeyer and WB Liu. Quasi-norm interpolation error estimates for the piecewise linear finite element approximation of p-Laplacian problems.Numerische Mathematik, 100(2):233–258, 2005

  39. [39]

    Springer, 2021

    Alexandre Ern and Jean-Luc Guermond.Finite elements, volume 1084. Springer, 2021

  40. [40]

    Springer, 2021

    Alexandre Ern, Jean-Luc Guermond, et al.Finite elements II. Springer, 2021

  41. [41]

    Ham et al.Firedrake User Manual

    David A. Ham et al.Firedrake User Manual. Imperial College London and University of Oxford and Baylor University and University of Washington, first edition edition, 5 2023

  42. [42]

    Satish Balay et. al. PETSc Web page.https://petsc.org/, 2026

  43. [43]

    Satish Balay et. al. PETSc/TAO users manual. Technical Report ANL-21/39 - Revision 3.25, Argonne National Laboratory, 2026

  44. [44]

    Kaˇ canov-Galerkin method and its application.Acta Universitatis Carolinae

    Svatopluk Fuˇ c´ ık, A Kratochv´ ıl, and Jindˇ rich Neˇ cas. Kaˇ canov-Galerkin method and its application.Acta Universitatis Carolinae. Mathematica et Physica, 15(1):31–33, 1974

  45. [45]

    Fractional higher differentiability for solutions of stationary Stokes and Navier-stokes systems with Orlicz growth.Potential Analysis, 60(2):647–672, 2024

    Flavia Giannetti, Antonia Passarelli di Napoli, and Christoph Scheven. Fractional higher differentiability for solutions of stationary Stokes and Navier-stokes systems with Orlicz growth.Potential Analysis, 60(2):647–672, 2024

  46. [46]

    Roland Glowinski and Americo Marroco. Sur l’approximation, par ´ el´ ements finis d’ordre un, et la r´ esolution, par p´ enalisation-dualit´ e d’une classe de probl` emes de dirichlet non lin´ eaires.Revue fran¸ caise d’automatique, informatique, recherche op´ erationnelle. Analyse num´ erique, 9(R2):41–76, 1975

  47. [47]

    The Kaˇ canov method for some nonlinear problems

    Weimin Han, Søren Jensen, and Igor Shimansky. The Kaˇ canov method for some nonlinear problems. Applied numerical mathematics, 24(1):57–79, 1997

  48. [48]

    Springer, 2019

    Petteri Harjulehto and Peter H¨ ast¨ o.Orlicz Spaces and Generalized Orlicz Spaces. Springer, 2019

  49. [49]

    Robust and scalable nonlinear solvers for finite element discretizations of biological transportation networks

    Jan Haskovec, Peter Markowich, Simone Portaro, and Stefano Zampini. Robust and scalable non- linear solvers for finite element discretizations of biological transportation networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.04447, 2025

  50. [50]

    Gradient flows for the p-Laplacian arising from biological network models: A novel dynamical relaxation approach.Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 31(3):708–731, 2026

    Jan Haskovec, Peter Markowich, and Stefano Zampini. Gradient flows for the p-Laplacian arising from biological network models: A novel dynamical relaxation approach.Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids, 31(3):708–731, 2026

  51. [51]

    Pascal Heid and Endre S¨ uli. An adaptive iterative linearised finite element method for implicitly constituted incompressible fluid flow problems and its application to Bingham fluids.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 181:364–387, 2022

  52. [52]

    On the convergence rate of the Kaˇ canov scheme for shear-thinning fluids

    Pascal Heid and Endre S¨ uli. On the convergence rate of the Kaˇ canov scheme for shear-thinning fluids. Calcolo, 59(1):4, 2022

  53. [53]

    Adaptive iterative linearization Galerkin methods for nonlinear problems.Mathematics of computation, 89(326):2707–2734, 2020

    Pascal Heid and Thomas Wihler. Adaptive iterative linearization Galerkin methods for nonlinear problems.Mathematics of computation, 89(326):2707–2734, 2020

  54. [54]

    A modified Kaˇ canov iteration scheme with application to quasilinear diffusion models.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 56(2):433–450, 2022

    Pascal Heid and Thomas P Wihler. A modified Kaˇ canov iteration scheme with application to quasilinear diffusion models.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 56(2):433–450, 2022

  55. [55]

    Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications

    Michael Hinze, Ren´ e Pinnau, Michael Ulbrich, and Stefan Ulbrich.Optimization with PDE Constraints. Mathematical Modelling: Theory and Applications. Springer, 2009. 37

  56. [56]

    Discontinuous Galerkin finite element approximation of quasilinear elliptic boundary value problems I: the scalar case.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 25(4):726–749, 2005

    Paul Houston, Janice Robson, and Endre S¨ uli. Discontinuous Galerkin finite element approximation of quasilinear elliptic boundary value problems I: the scalar case.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 25(4):726–749, 2005

  57. [57]

    Paul Houston, Endre S¨ uli, and Thomas P. Wihler. A posteriori error analysis of hp-version discontinuous Galerkin finite-element methods for second-order quasi-linear elliptic PDEs.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 28(2):245–273, 2008

  58. [58]

    Convergence of a method for solving the magnetostatic field in nonlinear media.Aplikace matematiky, 13(6):456–465, 1968

    Jozef Kaˇ cur, Jindˇ rich Neˇ cas, Josef Pol´ ak, and Jiˇ r´ ı Souˇ cek. Convergence of a method for solving the magnetostatic field in nonlinear media.Aplikace matematiky, 13(6):456–465, 1968

  59. [59]

    Convergence analysis of pseudo-transient continuation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 35(2):508–523, 1998

    Carl T Kelley and David E Keyes. Convergence analysis of pseudo-transient continuation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 35(2):508–523, 1998

  60. [60]

    Convex functions and Orlicz spaces.Noordhoff Ltd., New York, 1961

    Rutitskiˇi Y .B Krasnoselskiˇi M.A. Convex functions and Orlicz spaces.Noordhoff Ltd., New York, 1961

  61. [61]

    Matthias Liero and Alexander Mielke. Gradient structures and geodesic convexity for reaction–diffusion systems.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 371(2005):20120346, 2013

  62. [62]

    An effective finite element Newton method for 2D p-Laplace equation with particular initial iterative function.Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2016(1):281, 2016

    Zhendong Luo and Fei Teng. An effective finite element Newton method for 2D p-Laplace equation with particular initial iterative function.Journal of Inequalities and Applications, 2016(1):281, 2016

  63. [63]

    Gradient flows on nonpositively curved metric spaces and harmonic maps.Communications in Analysis and Geometry, 6:199–254, 1998

    Uwe Mayer. Gradient flows on nonpositively curved metric spaces and harmonic maps.Communications in Analysis and Geometry, 6:199–254, 1998

  64. [64]

    An introduction to the analysis of gradients systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05026, 2023

    Alexander Mielke. An introduction to the analysis of gradients systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05026, 2023

  65. [65]

    Gradient flows and evolution variational inequalities in metric spaces

    Matteo Muratori and Giuseppe Savar´ e. Gradient flows and evolution variational inequalities in metric spaces. I: Structural properties.Journal of Functional Analysis, 278(4):108347, 2020

  66. [66]

    Orlicz spaces and modular spaces.Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1034, 1983

    Julian Musielak. Orlicz spaces and modular spaces.Lecture Notes in Mathematics, 1034, 1983

  67. [67]

    Solution of Signorini’s contact problem in the deformation theory of plasticity by secant modules method.Aplikace matematiky, 28(3):199–214, 1983

    Jindˇ rich Neˇ cas and Ivan Hlav´ aˇ cek. Solution of Signorini’s contact problem in the deformation theory of plasticity by secant modules method.Aplikace matematiky, 28(3):199–214, 1983

  68. [68]

    Non-Newtonian fluids and function spaces.Nonlinear analysis, function spaces and applications, pages 95–143, 2007

    Michael Ruˇ ziˇ cka and Lars Diening. Non-Newtonian fluids and function spaces.Nonlinear analysis, function spaces and applications, pages 95–143, 2007

  69. [69]

    Interpolation and extrapolation of linear operators in Orlicz spaces

    Igor Borisovich Simonenko. Interpolation and extrapolation of linear operators in Orlicz spaces. In Doklady Akademii Nauk, volume 151 (6), pages 1288–1291. Russian Academy of Sciences, 1963

  70. [70]

    Andrew M. Stuart. Inverse problems: A Bayesian perspective.Acta Numerica, 19:451–559, 2010

  71. [71]

    American Mathemat- ical Society, 2012

    Gerald Teschl.Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, volume 140. American Mathemat- ical Society, 2012

  72. [72]

    Finite element approximations of solutions to p-harmonic equation with Dirichlet data

    Dongming Wei. Finite element approximations of solutions to p-harmonic equation with Dirichlet data. Numerical functional analysis and optimization, 10(11-12):1235–1251, 1989

  73. [73]

    Algebraic multigrid methods.Acta Numerica, 26:591–721, 2017

    Jinchao Xu and Ludmil Zikatanov. Algebraic multigrid methods.Acta Numerica, 26:591–721, 2017

  74. [74]

    PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1979

    Kenji Yasuda.Investigation of the analogies between viscometric and linear viscoelastic properties of polystyrene fluids. PhD thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1979

  75. [75]

    Shear flow properties of concentrated solutions of linear and star branched polystyrenes.Rheologica Acta, 20(2):163–178, 1981

    KY Yasuda, RC Armstrong, and RE Cohen. Shear flow properties of concentrated solutions of linear and star branched polystyrenes.Rheologica Acta, 20(2):163–178, 1981

  76. [76]

    PCBDDC: a class of robust dual-primal methods in PETSc.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 38(5):S282–S306, 2016

    Stefano Zampini. PCBDDC: a class of robust dual-primal methods in PETSc.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 38(5):S282–S306, 2016

  77. [77]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 2013

    Eberhard Zeidler.Nonlinear functional analysis and its applications: II/B: nonlinear monotone operators. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013. 38 A Appendix Lemma A.1.Let0< s≤tandS − ϕ , S+ ϕ given in Assumption 2.6. Then (i)ϕ ′ satisfies the two-point growth s t S+ ϕ ≤ ϕ′(s) ϕ′(t) ≤ s t S− ϕ , (ii)µsatisfies the two-point growth s t S+ ϕ −1 2 ≤ µ(s) µ...