pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06111 · v2 · pith:I7GLPJRYnew · submitted 2026-06-04 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

A microscopic design rule for spin supersolids in triangular-lattice magnets

Ryota Ono , Jun'ichi Ieda , Michiyasu Mori , Sadamichi Maekawa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 23:43 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords spin supersolidstriangular latticecobaltatesexchange anisotropytrigonal crystal fieldspin-orbit couplingfrustrated magnetismquantum magnets
0
0 comments X

The pith

The ratio of trigonal crystal field to spin-orbit coupling sets exchange anisotropy Δ in triangular-lattice cobaltates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines the microscopic origin of exchange anisotropy in two families of triangular-lattice cobaltate compounds. By constructing tailored realistic spin models for these materials, the authors demonstrate that the anisotropy parameter Δ is fixed by the ratio of trigonal crystal field strength to spin-orbit coupling strength. This relation accounts for the different anisotropy values seen across the families and supplies a way to forecast how ion substitutions will alter Δ. It also singles out compounds where the resulting anisotropy should favor a spin supersolid state.

Core claim

We show that Δ is determined by the ratio of trigonal crystal field to spin-orbit coupling strength. This framework explains contrasting anisotropies in these families, predicts systematic trends in Δ across X/Y-substitutions, and identifies candidate materials for spin supersolids. Our results establish trigonal field engineering as a microscopic route toward the design of spin supersolids.

What carries the argument

The ratio of trigonal crystal field strength to spin-orbit coupling strength, which fixes the exchange anisotropy Δ.

If this is right

  • Contrasting anisotropies observed in the phosphate and selenite families arise from different values of this ratio.
  • Systematic trends in Δ follow from changes in X or Y ions.
  • Specific substituted compounds emerge as candidates for spin supersolids.
  • Trigonal field engineering supplies a microscopic design route for spin supersolids.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same model-tailoring approach could be applied to other frustrated magnets to locate additional supersolid candidates.
  • External tuning of the crystal field via strain might allow experimental control over the anisotropy and the supersolid regime.
  • The ratio-based rule may extend to other cases where spin-orbit and crystal-field effects compete in quantum magnets.

Load-bearing premise

The tailored realistic spin models isolate the trigonal crystal field versus spin-orbit coupling contribution and omit no other mechanisms that could dominate the anisotropy.

What would settle it

Measuring Δ across a series of X- and Y-substituted compounds and checking whether the values track the predicted dependence on the trigonal-field to spin-orbit ratio.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06111 by Jun'ichi Ieda, Michiyasu Mori, Ryota Ono, Sadamichi Maekawa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Crystal structure of NaBaCP and KCSO. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Plot of ∆ as a function of ωtrig/λeff for the target materials. Solid and open circles denote calculated values for the XBaCP and XCSO series, respectively. While solid and open stars indicate experimental estimates for KCSO and NaBaCP, respectively. The solid black curve shows the theoretical relation ∆ = γ as a function of ωtrig/λeff obtained by solving the minimal single-ion model in Eq. (5). Above the … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: ∆ in the XYCP family by combined X- and Y - site substitutions. The red and blue colors denote ∆ > 1 and ∆ < 1, respectively, corresponding to the supersolid and superfluid of the XXZ phase diagram. To understand the microscopic origin of ∆, we first isolate the single-ion contributions to it in XYCP and XCSO. In an octahedral environment, the lowest-energy term of high-spin Co2+ is 4T1g [52], which can be… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin supersolids emerge as a central topic in frustrated magnetism, motivating the search for realization in quantum materials. To this end, we study the origin of exchange anisotropy, $\Delta$, in triangular-lattice cobaltate families $X_2$$Y$Co(PO$_4$)$_2$ and $X_2$Co(SeO$_3$)$_2$ ($X$ = Na, K, Rb, Cs; $Y$ = Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba) by tailoring realistic spin models. We show that $\Delta$ is determined by the ratio of trigonal crystal field to spin-orbit coupling strength. This framework explains contrasting anisotropies in these families, predicts systematic trends in $\Delta$ across $X/Y$-substitutions, and identifies candidate materials for spin supersolids. Our results establish trigonal field engineering as a microscopic route toward the design of spin supersolids.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims to establish a microscopic design rule for spin supersolids by studying the origin of exchange anisotropy Δ in the triangular-lattice cobaltate families X₂YCo(PO₄)₂ and X₂Co(SeO₃)₂ (X = Na, K, Rb, Cs; Y = Mg, Ca, Sr, Ba). Using tailored realistic spin models, it asserts that Δ is fixed by the ratio of trigonal crystal field to spin-orbit coupling strength; this is said to explain family-dependent anisotropies, predict substitution trends, and identify supersolid candidates.

Significance. If the central claim is supported by the model construction and extractions, the result would supply a concrete microscopic route (trigonal-field engineering) for realizing spin supersolids, which is of clear interest to the frustrated-magnetism community.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that Δ is determined by the trigonal-crystal-field / spin-orbit ratio is presented without any equations, model Hamiltonians, or extraction procedure; it is therefore impossible to verify whether the tailored spin models isolate this ratio or whether other anisotropy mechanisms have been omitted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and the comment on the abstract. We address the point below and clarify how the full manuscript supports the central claim.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that Δ is determined by the trigonal-crystal-field / spin-orbit ratio is presented without any equations, model Hamiltonians, or extraction procedure; it is therefore impossible to verify whether the tailored spin models isolate this ratio or whether other anisotropy mechanisms have been omitted.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as a concise summary, contains no equations or technical details; this is standard for abstracts. The full manuscript (Sections II and III) constructs the tailored spin models from the crystal structures of the two families, writes the explicit spin Hamiltonian including single-ion anisotropy, exchange terms, and the trigonal-field contribution to the effective Δ, and details the numerical extraction procedure (exact diagonalization on finite clusters combined with perturbative analysis). These steps isolate the trigonal-crystal-field / spin-orbit ratio as the dominant control parameter while showing that other anisotropy channels (e.g., dipolar, higher-order crystal-field terms) are either symmetry-forbidden or numerically sub-dominant in the studied compounds. We can add one sentence to the abstract summarizing the model construction if the editor permits, but we maintain that the verifiability of the claim rests on the main text rather than the abstract. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The provided abstract claims that exchange anisotropy Δ is determined by the ratio of trigonal crystal field to spin-orbit coupling strength via tailored realistic spin models, explaining anisotropies and predicting trends. No equations, parameter-fitting procedures, self-citations, or ansatzes are visible that would reduce this claim to a self-definitional input or fitted quantity by construction. The derivation appears self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing circular steps detectable in the given text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the given information.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5700 in / 1132 out tokens · 23715 ms · 2026-06-27T23:43:07.710768+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

77 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Matsuda and T

    H. Matsuda and T. Tsuneto, Off-Diagonal Long-Range Order in Solids, Progress of Theoretical Physics Supple- ment46, 411 (1970)

    1970

  2. [2]

    Liu and M

    K.-S. Liu and M. E. Fisher, Quantum lattice gas and the existence of a supersolid, Journal of Low Temperature Physics10, 655 (1973)

    1973

  3. [3]

    Wessel and M

    S. Wessel and M. Troyer, Supersolid hard-core bosons on 5 the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 127205 (2005)

    2005

  4. [4]

    Heidarian and K

    D. Heidarian and K. Damle, Persistent supersolid phase of hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 127206 (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    R. G. Melko, A. Paramekanti, A. A. Burkov, A. Vish- wanath, D. N. Sheng, and L. Balents, Supersolid order from disorder: Hard-core bosons on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 127207 (2005)

    2005

  6. [6]

    Boninsegni and N

    M. Boninsegni and N. Prokof’ev, Supersolid Phase of Hard-Core Bosons on a Triangular Lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 237204 (2005)

    2005

  7. [7]

    Heidarian and A

    D. Heidarian and A. Paramekanti, Supersolidity in the Triangular Lattice Spin-1/2XXZModel: A Variational Perspective, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 015301 (2010)

    2010

  8. [8]

    Yamamoto, G

    D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, and I. Danshita, Quantum Phase Diagram of the Triangular-LatticeXXZModel in a Magnetic Field, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 127203 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Huang, S

    Y. Huang, S. Yunoki, and S. Maekawa, Emergent Spin Supersolids in Frustrated Quantum Materials, Advanced Materialsn/a, e00005

  10. [10]

    Xiang, C

    J. Xiang, C. Zhang, Y. Gao, W. Schmidt, K. Schmalzl, C.-W. Wang, B. Li, N. Xi, X.-Y. Liu, H. Jin, G. Li, J. Shen, Z. Chen, Y. Qi, Y. Wan, W. Jin, W. Li, P. Sun, and G. Su, Giant magnetocaloric effect in spin supersolid candidate Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Nature625, 270 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    K¨ onig, M

    J. K¨ onig, M. C. Bønsager, and A. H. MacDonald, Dissi- pationless spin transport in thin film ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 187202 (2001)

    2001

  12. [12]

    Takei and Y

    S. Takei and Y. Tserkovnyak, Superfluid spin transport through easy-plane ferromagnetic insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 227201 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    Qaiumzadeh, H

    A. Qaiumzadeh, H. Skarsv˚ ag, C. Holmqvist, and A. Brataas, Spin Superfluidity in Biaxial Antiferromag- netic Insulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 137201 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    Y. Gao, Y. Huang, S. Maekawa, and W. Li, Spin Seebeck Effect of Triangular Lattice Spin Supersolid, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 236504 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    Ulaga, J

    M. Ulaga, J. Kokalj, T. Tohyama, and P. Prelovˇ sek, The anisotropic Heisenberg model close to the Ising limit: triangular lattice vs. effective models (2025), arXiv:2510.12667 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    X. Xu, Z. Wu, Y. Chen, Q. Huang, Z. Hu, X. Shi, K. Du, S. Li, R. Bian, R. Yu, Y. Cui, H. Zhou, and W. Yu, NMR study of spin supersolid phases in the triangular- lattice antiferromagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Phys. Rev. B 112, 125163 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    M. Zhu, V. Romerio, N. Steiger, S. D. Nabi, N. Mu- rai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, K. Y. Povarov, Y. Skourski, R. Sibille, L. Keller, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, and A. Zhe- ludev, Continuum excitations in a spin supersolid on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 186704 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    M. Zhu, L. M. Chinellato, V. Romerio, N. Murai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, C. Balz, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, Y. Kato, C. D. Batista, and A. Zheludev, Wannier states and spin supersolid physics in the triangular antiferro- magnet K 2Co(SeO3)2, npj Quantum Materials10, 74 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    T. Chen, A. Ghasemi, J. Zhang, L. Shi, Z. Tagay, Y. Chen, L. Chen, E. S. Choi, M. Jaime, M. Lee, Y. Hao, H. Cao, B. L. Winn, A. A. Podlesnyak, D. M. Pa- jerowski, R. Zhong, X. Xu, N. P. Armitage, R. Cava, and C. Broholm, Phase diagram and spectroscopic sig- natures of a supersolid in the quantum ising magnet K2Co(SeO3)2, Nature Communications 10.1038/s414...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2026

  20. [20]

    Y. Cui, Z. Wu, Z. Sun, K. Du, J. Luo, S. Li, J. Yang, J. Wang, R. Zhou, Q. Chen, Y. Kohama, A. Miyata, Z. Yang, R. Yu, and W. Yu, Spin-supersolidity induced quantum criticality and magnetocaloric effect in the triangular-lattice antiferromagnet Rb2Co(SeO3)2 (2025), arXiv:2509.26151 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    K. Shi, Y. Q. Han, B. C. Yu, L. S. Ling, W. Tong, C. Y. Xi, T. Shang, Z. Wang, L. Pi, and L. Ma, Ab- sence of high-field spin supersolid phase in Rb2Co(SeO3)2 with a triangular lattice (2025), arXiv:2509.06281 [cond- mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, G. Xu, Z. Xu, and R. J. Cava, Strong quantum fluctuations in a quantum spin liquid candidate with a Co-based triangular lattice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 14505 (2019)

    2019

  23. [23]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, and R. J. Cava, Frustrated magnetism in the layered triangular lattice materials K 2Co(SeO3)2 and Rb2Co(SeO3)2, Phys. Rev. Mater.4, 084406 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    N. Li, Q. Huang, X. Y. Yue, W. J. Chu, Q. Chen, E. S. Choi, X. Zhao, H. D. Zhou, and X. F. Sun, Possible itinerant excitations and quantum spin state transitions in the effective spin-1/2 triangular-lattice antiferromag- net Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Nature Communications11, 4216 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Momoi and M

    T. Momoi and M. Suzuki, Ground-State Proper- ties and Phase Diagram of the Quantum XXZ An- tiferromagnet on a Triangular Lattice, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan61, 3732 (1992), https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.61.3732

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.61.3732 1992

  26. [26]

    Yamamoto, G

    D. Yamamoto, G. Marmorini, and I. Danshita, Micro- scopic Model Calculations for the Magnetization Process of Layered Triangular-Lattice Quantum Antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 027201 (2015)

    2015

  27. [27]

    Sellmann, X.-F

    D. Sellmann, X.-F. Zhang, and S. Eggert, Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic XXZ model on the triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. B91, 081104 (2015)

    2015

  28. [28]

    Sheng, L

    J. Sheng, L. Wang, A. Candini, W. Jiang, L. Huang, B. Xi, J. Zhao, H. Ge, N. Zhao, Y. Fu, J. Ren, J. Yang, P. Miao, X. Tong, D. Yu, S. Wang, Q. Liu, M. Kofu, R. Mole, G. Biasiol, D. Yu, I. A. Zaliznyak, J.-W. Mei, and L. Wu, Two-dimensional quantum universality in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Proceedings of the Na...

    2022

  29. [29]

    Gao, Y.-C

    Y. Gao, Y.-C. Fan, H. Li, F. Yang, X.-T. Zeng, X.-L. Sheng, R. Zhong, Y. Qi, Y. Wan, and W. Li, Spin su- persolidity in nearly ideal easy-axis triangular quantum antiferromagnet Na2BaCo(PO4)2, npj Quantum Materi- als7, 89 (2022)

    2022

  30. [30]

    Zhong, S

    R. Zhong, S. Guo, G. Xu, Z. Xu, and R. J. Cava, Strong quantum fluctuations in a quantum spin liquid candi- date with a Co-based triangular lattice, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences116, 14505 (2019), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1906483116

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1906483116 2019

  31. [31]

    Kajita, T

    Y. Kajita, T. Nagai, S. Yamagishi, K. Kimura, M. Hagi- hala, and T. Kimura, Ferroaxial transitions in glaserite- type Na2BaM(PO4)2 (M = Mg, Mn, Co, and Ni), Chem- istry of Materials36, 7451 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    Wildner, Isotypism of a selenite with a car- bonate: Structure of the buetschliite-type compound K2Co(SeO3)2, Acta Crystallographica

    M. Wildner, Isotypism of a selenite with a car- bonate: Structure of the buetschliite-type compound K2Co(SeO3)2, Acta Crystallographica. Section C: Crys- tal Structure Communications48(2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized 6 gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  34. [34]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Sc...

    2009

  35. [35]

    The Supplementary Material in- cludes Refs

    See Supplementary Material for details of calculations and extended discussions, including (S1) first-principles calculations and low energy Hubbard model, (S2) su- perexchange theory, (S3) exchange interactions further than nearest neighbor, (S4) single-ion spin-orbit entan- glement in Kramers doublet (S5) validity of the Kramers- doublet (pseudospin-1/2...

  36. [36]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized gen- eralized wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  37. [37]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  38. [38]

    Aryasetiawan, K

    F. Aryasetiawan, K. Karlsson, O. Jepsen, and U. Sch¨ onberger, Calculations of HubbardUfrom first- principles, Phys. Rev. B74, 125106 (2006)

    2006

  39. [39]

    P. W. Anderson, Antiferromagnetism. theory of superex- change interaction, Phys. Rev.79, 350 (1950)

    1950

  40. [40]

    I. V. Solovyev, Combining DFT and many-body methods to understand correlated materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 293201 (2008)

    2008

  41. [41]

    I. V. Solovyev, Superexchange interactions in orthorhom- bically distorted titanates RTiO 3 (R=Y, Gd, Sm and La), New Journal of Physics11, 093003 (2009)

    2009

  42. [42]

    S. A. Nikolaev and I. V. Solovyev, Microscopic theory of electric polarization induced by skyrmionic order in GaV4S8, Phys. Rev. B99, 100401 (2019)

    2019

  43. [43]

    R. Ono, S. Nikolaev, and I. Solovyev, Fingerprints of spin-current physics on magnetoelectric response in the spin- 1 2 magnet Ba2CuGe2O7, Phys. Rev. B102, 064422 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Y. Li, G. Chen, W. Tong, L. Pi, J. Liu, Z. Yang, X. Wang, and Q. Zhang, Rare-Earth Triangular Lattice Spin Liq- uid: A Single-Crystal Study of YbMgGaO 4, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 167203 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Y.-D. Li, X. Wang, and G. Chen, Anisotropic spin model of strong spin-orbit-coupled triangular antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B94, 035107 (2016)

    2016

  46. [46]

    Z. Zhu, P. A. Maksimov, S. R. White, and A. L. Cherny- shev, Topography of spin liquids on a triangular lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 207203 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Jackeli and G

    G. Jackeli and G. Khaliullin, Mott Insulators in the Strong Spin-Orbit Coupling Limit: From Heisenberg to a Quantum Compass and Kitaev Models, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017205 (2009)

    2009

  48. [48]

    J. G. Rau, E. K.-H. Lee, and H.-Y. Kee, Generic Spin Model for the Honeycomb Iridates beyond the Kitaev Limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 077204 (2014)

    2014

  49. [49]

    S. M. Winter, A. A. Tsirlin, M. Daghofer, J. van den Brink, Y. Singh, P. Gegenwart, and R. Valent´ ı, Models and materials for generalized Kitaev magnetism, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter29, 493002 (2017)

    2017

  50. [50]

    J. V. Jos´ e, L. P. Kadanoff, S. Kirkpatrick, and D. R. Nel- son, Renormalization, vortices, and symmetry-breaking perturbations in the two-dimensional planar model, Phys. Rev. B16, 1217 (1977)

    1977

  51. [51]

    Park, S.-M

    S. Park, S.-M. Park, Y.-T. Oh, H.-Y. Lee, and E.- G. Moon, Spin-orbit-induced instability and finite- temperature stabilization of a triangular-lattice super- solid (2026), arXiv:2601.20963 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Tanabe and S

    Y. Tanabe and S. Sugano, On the Absorption Spectra of Complex Ions, III The Calculation of the Crystalline Field Strength, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 11, 864 (1956)

    1956

  53. [53]

    Oguchi, Theory of Magnetism in CoCl2·2H2O, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan20, 2236 (1965)

    T. Oguchi, Theory of Magnetism in CoCl2·2H2O, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan20, 2236 (1965)

    1965

  54. [54]

    V. V. Men’shikov, V. V. Rudenko, V. I. Tugarinov, A. M. Vorotynov, and S. G. Ovchinnikov, Uniaxial magnetic anisotropy of rhombohedral CoCO 3 crystals at T = 0 K, Physics of the Solid State56, 468 (2014)

    2014

  55. [55]

    Difference between ∆ andγindicates effects from higher- order crystal field and anisotropic part ofJ ab ij

  56. [57]

    C. J. Ballhausen,Introduction to Ligand Field Theory (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962)

    1962

  57. [58]

    Georges, L

    A. Georges, L. d. Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong Cor- relations from Hund’s Coupling, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics4, 137 (2013)

    2013

  58. [59]

    Ribic, E

    T. Ribic, E. Assmann, A. T´ oth, and K. Held, Cubic in- teraction parameters fort 2g Wannier orbitals, Phys. Rev. B90, 165105 (2014)

    2014

  59. [60]

    M. M. Ferreira-Carvalho, S. H. Chen, Y. C. Ku, A. Jose, R. Morrow, C. Y. Kuo, C. F. Chang, Z. Hu, M. W. Haverkort, and L. H. Tjeng, Direct evidence of a near- idealJ eff = 1/2 ground state in triangular-lattice Na2BaCo(PO4)2, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 025004 (2026)

    2026

  60. [61]

    K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix Elements and Operator Equiv- alents Connected with the Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Ions, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A65, 209 (1952). Supplementary Materials: A microscopic design rule for spin supersolids in triangular-lattice magnets Ryota Ono, 1,∗ Jun’ichi Ieda, 1 Michiyasu Mori,1 and Sadamichi Maekawa 1,...

    1952

  61. [62]

    Giannozzi, S

    P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococcioni, I. Dabo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. Scan...

    2009

  62. [63]

    D. R. Hamann, Optimized norm-conserving Vanderbilt pseudopotentials, Phys. Rev. B88, 085117 (2013)

    2013

  63. [64]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  64. [65]

    I. V. Solovyev, Combining DFT and many-body methods to understand correlated materials, Journal of Physics: Condensed Table S5. Trigonal distortion parameterrforXBaCP andXCSO. Experimental structural values are shown in parentheses, while the other values are obtained from theoretical structural relaxation. XXBaCPXCSO Na (1.088) 1.220 K 1.109 (1.175) Rb 1...

    2008

  65. [66]

    S. A. Nikolaev and I. V. Solovyev, Microscopic theory of electric polarization induced by skyrmionic order in GaV 4S8, Phys. Rev. B99, 100401 (2019)

    2019

  66. [67]

    R. Ono, S. Nikolaev, and I. Solovyev, Fingerprints of spin-current physics on magnetoelectric response in the spin-1 2 magnet Ba2CuGe2O7, Phys. Rev. B102, 064422 (2020)

    2020

  67. [68]

    Marzari and D

    N. Marzari and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized generalized Wannier functions for composite energy bands, Phys. Rev. B56, 12847 (1997)

    1997

  68. [69]

    Marzari, A

    N. Marzari, A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Maximally localized Wannier functions: Theory and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.84, 1419 (2012)

    2012

  69. [70]

    Aryasetiawan, K

    F. Aryasetiawan, K. Karlsson, O. Jepsen, and U. Sch¨ onberger, Calculations of HubbardUfrom first-principles, Phys. Rev. B74, 125106 (2006)

    2006

  70. [71]

    C. J. Ballhausen,Introduction to Ligand Field Theory(McGraw-Hill, New York, 1962)

    1962

  71. [72]

    Georges, L

    A. Georges, L. d. Medici, and J. Mravlje, Strong Correlations from Hund’s Coupling, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics4, 137 (2013)

    2013

  72. [73]

    Ribic, E

    T. Ribic, E. Assmann, A. T´ oth, and K. Held, Cubic interaction parameters fort 2g Wannier orbitals, Phys. Rev. B90, 165105 (2014)

    2014

  73. [74]

    Sheng, L

    J. Sheng, L. Wang, A. Candini, W. Jiang, L. Huang, B. Xi, J. Zhao, H. Ge, N. Zhao, Y. Fu, J. Ren, J. Yang, P. Miao, X. Tong, D. Yu, S. Wang, Q. Liu, M. Kofu, R. Mole, G. Biasiol, D. Yu, I. A. Zaliznyak, J.-W. Mei, and L. Wu, Two- dimensional quantum universality in the spin-1/2 triangular-lattice quantum antiferromagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Proceed- ings of th...

    2022

  74. [75]

    Gao, Y.-C

    Y. Gao, Y.-C. Fan, H. Li, F. Yang, X.-T. Zeng, X.-L. Sheng, R. Zhong, Y. Qi, Y. Wan, and W. Li, Spin supersolidity in nearly ideal easy-axis triangular quantum antiferromagnet Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, npj Quantum Materials7, 89 (2022)

    2022

  75. [76]

    M. Zhu, L. M. Chinellato, V. Romerio, N. Murai, S. Ohira-Kawamura, C. Balz, Z. Yan, S. Gvasaliya, Y. Kato, C. D. Batista, and A. Zheludev, Wannier states and spin supersolid physics in the triangular antiferromagnet K 2Co(SeO3)2, npj Quantum Materials10, 74 (2025)

    2025

  76. [77]

    M. M. Ferreira-Carvalho, S. H. Chen, Y. C. Ku, A. Jose, R. Morrow, C. Y. Kuo, C. F. Chang, Z. Hu, M. W. Haverkort, and L. H. Tjeng, Direct evidence of a near-idealJ eff = 1/2 ground state in triangular-lattice Na 2BaCo(PO4)2, Phys. Rev. Mater.10, 025004 (2026)

    2026

  77. [78]

    K. W. H. Stevens, Matrix Elements and Operator Equivalents Connected with the Magnetic Properties of Rare Earth Ions, Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A65, 209 (1952)

    1952