pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07347 · v1 · pith:K633JI5Enew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 📡 eess.SP · cs.ET

CSI Phase Averaging for High-Sensitivity Wi-Fi Sensing in Low-Multipath Environments

Toshinori Suzuki , Shin-ichiro Ogura , Yu Morishima , Hiroshi Matsuura This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 21:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP cs.ET
keywords CSI phase averagingWi-Fi sensingmotion detectionlow-multipath environmentsoutdoor sensingbird detectionIEEE 802.11ac
0
0 comments X

The pith

CSI phase averaging mitigates device errors to detect motion several meters off the direct path in low-multipath settings.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a low-complexity method for outdoor Wi-Fi motion sensing that averages the phase components of channel state information. It relies on the regular phase structure present in low-multipath environments to cancel hardware-induced phase offsets and to reduce random noise through averaging gain. Experiments with commercial 802.11ac devices in an orchard show that the approach detects flying crows even when they pass several meters beside the transmitter-receiver line of sight. The same tests indicate that wind-driven vegetation movement stays negligible below 3 m/s. The work positions the technique as suitable for orchard monitoring and other outdoor applications that share low-multipath conditions.

Core claim

In low-multipath propagation environments the structural characteristics of CSI phase components permit model-driven averaging that removes phase offset errors from wireless devices while supplying processing gain against quantization and thermal noise, thereby enabling detection of birds flying several meters away from the direct line-of-sight path between transmitter and receiver antennas.

What carries the argument

Model-driven averaging of CSI phase components that exploits the structural regularity of low-multipath environments to correct device phase offsets and suppress noise.

If this is right

  • Birds can be detected several meters away from the direct transmitter-receiver path.
  • Vegetation fluctuations remain negligible at wind speeds below 3 m/s.
  • The method works with unmodified commercial IEEE 802.11ac devices.
  • The same approach applies to other outdoor sensing tasks in low-multipath settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The phase-averaging step could be combined with existing amplitude-based CSI methods to increase robustness in mixed environments.
  • Similar averaging might support detection of slower or larger targets such as vehicles or people in open outdoor areas.
  • Deployment in additional low-multipath sites such as open fields or along roads would test whether the reported performance generalizes.

Load-bearing premise

Low-multipath propagation environments produce consistent structural features in the CSI phase that can be modeled and averaged to correct device-induced phase offsets.

What would settle it

Measurements in the same orchard setup showing that phase offsets remain after averaging or that birds several meters off the line-of-sight path are no longer detected would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.07347 by Hiroshi Matsuura, Shin-ichiro Ogura, Toshinori Suzuki, Yu Morishima.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIGURE 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: is considered, the proportional relationship between φ Air i,k and subcarrier index k is preserved when the horizontal distance R is sufficiently larger than the antenna heights hT and hR. In this case, the complex CSI can be approximated by FIGURE 5. Two-ray ground reflection model (R1 = li ). j 4πhT hR λkR2 e −j 2πR1 λk , (4) VOLUME 11, 2023 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIGURE 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIGURE 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIGURE 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIGURE 9 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: a. Despite these environmental variations, their influence on the proposed sensing method was found to be extremely limited. This is considered to be because vegetation motion and light rainfall droplets produce much weaker reflections than medium-sized birds such as crows, while their movement 10 VOLUME 11, 2023 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper presents a low-complexity motion detection method for outdoor Wi-Fi sensing based on a model-driven approach. The method exploits the structural characteristics of the phase components in channel state information (CSI) for low-multipath propagation environments, which are generally considered disadvantageous for Wi-Fi sensing, to mitigate the phase offset errors originating from wireless devices. In addition, phase averaging provides a processing gain that reduces the random noise components, including quantization and thermal noise. The theoretical basis of the method is described and its effectiveness is experimentally evaluated using Compressed Beamforming frames obtained from commercial IEEE 802.11ac devices. The experiments primarily focus wild crows flying in an outdoor orchard environment. The experimental results demonstrate that the method can detect birds even when they fly several meters away from the direct line-of-sight path between the transmitter and receiver antennas. Furthermore, the results indicated that fluctuations caused by vegetation movement were negligible when the wind speed was less than 3~m/s. The proposed approach is expected to be applicable not only to orchard monitoring but also to other outdoor Wi-Fi sensing applications in low-multipath environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a low-complexity, model-driven CSI phase averaging technique for motion detection in low-multipath outdoor Wi-Fi environments. It exploits structural properties of CSI phase components to mitigate device phase offsets and applies averaging for processing gain against noise. The central experimental claim is that the method detects wild crows flying several meters off the direct LOS path between commercial 802.11ac transmitter and receiver antennas in an orchard setting, while vegetation motion effects remain negligible below 3 m/s wind speed.

Significance. If validated, the approach would provide a practical, hardware-friendly sensing solution for low-multipath outdoor scenarios (e.g., orchard monitoring) where conventional Wi-Fi sensing is considered disadvantageous. The use of real Compressed Beamforming frames from commercial devices and explicit focus on off-LOS targets constitutes a concrete experimental contribution.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Theoretical basis] Abstract and theoretical basis section: the off-LOS detection claim (birds several meters laterally from the direct path) is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet no link-budget calculation, expected differential phase shift from the scattered component, or comparison of scattered-path power to residual noise floor after averaging is supplied; in a low-multipath regime the direct path dominates and the diffracted amplitude set by RCS and extra path loss may fall below detectability even after averaging.
  2. [Experimental evaluation] Experimental evaluation: the abstract states detection success with real devices but supplies no quantitative metrics (detection probability, ROC curves, SNR improvement, error bars, or number of trials), leaving the performance outcome only moderately supported and preventing assessment of whether phase averaging actually overcomes the weak scattered-signal regime.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Theoretical basis] Notation for CSI phase components and the exact averaging operation should be defined with equations early in the theoretical section to allow readers to reproduce the claimed processing gain.
  2. [Experimental setup] The manuscript should clarify the precise distance range and geometry of the off-LOS flights (e.g., minimum lateral separation) in the experimental setup description.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thoughtful comments on our manuscript. We provide point-by-point responses to the major comments below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Theoretical basis] Abstract and theoretical basis section: the off-LOS detection claim (birds several meters laterally from the direct path) is load-bearing for the paper's contribution, yet no link-budget calculation, expected differential phase shift from the scattered component, or comparison of scattered-path power to residual noise floor after averaging is supplied; in a low-multipath regime the direct path dominates and the diffracted amplitude set by RCS and extra path loss may fall below detectability even after averaging.

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative link-budget analysis would help support the off-LOS detection claim in the low-multipath setting. Although the primary contribution is the model-driven phase averaging technique and its experimental validation, we will add a new subsection in the theoretical basis section providing an order-of-magnitude link budget. This will include estimates of bird RCS, extra path loss for lateral scattering, and the noise reduction factor from averaging multiple CSI samples. This addition will clarify why the scattered component remains detectable despite the dominant direct path. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Experimental evaluation] Experimental evaluation: the abstract states detection success with real devices but supplies no quantitative metrics (detection probability, ROC curves, SNR improvement, error bars, or number of trials), leaving the performance outcome only moderately supported and preventing assessment of whether phase averaging actually overcomes the weak scattered-signal regime.

    Authors: The experiments rely on opportunistic observations of wild bird flights in an orchard, which limits the ability to generate full statistical metrics such as ROC curves that would require a large number of controlled trials. The manuscript includes multiple example time series demonstrating detection of off-LOS motion and negligible vegetation effects. In the revision, we will add the number of observed events, estimates of SNR improvement due to averaging, and error bars on relevant plots. We believe this will better support the claims while remaining faithful to the experimental constraints. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental method validated on external data

full rationale

The paper proposes a model-driven CSI phase averaging technique that exploits phase structure in low-multipath settings to reduce device offsets and noise. Its central claims rest on a described theoretical basis followed by direct experimental evaluation using commercial 802.11ac devices and real-world crow flights in an orchard. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are shown that would reduce the reported detection performance to a quantity defined by the method itself. The off-LOS detection result is assessed against independent external observations rather than being forced by construction from the inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the model-driven claim rests on an unelaborated assumption about phase structure in low-multipath channels.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5741 in / 1141 out tokens · 19319 ms · 2026-06-27T21:05:32.919386+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Cost benefit analysis of a netting technology package in real farming conditions among smallholder farmers in Kenya,

    E. Mujuka, L. Parrot, W. Baird, E. Delettre, J. Simon, J. Mburu and T. Mar- tin, "Cost benefit analysis of a netting technology package in real farming conditions among smallholder farmers in Kenya," inXXXI International Horticultural Congress (IHC2022), Angers, France, Oct. 2023, pp. 153- 158

    2023

  2. [2]

    Bird Deterrent Solutions for Crop Protection: Approaches, Challenges, and Opportunities,

    Eduardo B. Micaelo, Leonardo G. P . S. Lourenço, Pedro D. Gaspar, João M. L. P . Caldeira and V asco N. G. J. Soares, "Bird Deterrent Solutions for Crop Protection: Approaches, Challenges, and Opportunities,"Agriculture, vol. 13, no. 4:774, pp. 1-29, Feb. 2023, DOI: 10.3390/agriculture13040774

    work page doi:10.3390/agriculture13040774 2023

  3. [3]

    Current status of bird damage on crop and four new countermeasures,

    Y . Y amaguchi, "Current status of bird damage on crop and four new countermeasures,"Japanese Journal of Farm Work Research, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 65-74, June 2019, DOI: 10.4035/jsfwr.54.65

    work page doi:10.4035/jsfwr.54.65 2019

  4. [4]

    A survey on CSI-based Wi-Fi sensing datasets and models with a focus on reproducibility,

    I. Guarino, D. Carra, M. Cominelli, F. Gringoli and R. L. Cigno, "A survey on CSI-based Wi-Fi sensing datasets and models with a focus on reproducibility," inComputer Communications, vol. 249, (2026)108431, pp. 1-18, Jan 2026, DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2026.108431

    work page doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2026.108431 2026

  5. [5]

    Commodity Wi-Fi-Based Wireless Sensing Advancements over the Past Five Y ears,

    H. Zhu, E. Dong, M. Xu, H. Lv and F. Wu, "Commodity Wi-Fi-Based Wireless Sensing Advancements over the Past Five Y ears," inSensorsV ol. 24, Issue 22, Mar 2023, DOI: 10.3390/s24227195

    work page doi:10.3390/s24227195 2023

  6. [6]

    Wireless sensing applications with Wi-Fi Channel State Informa- tion, preprocessing techniques, and detection algorithms: A survey,

    J. A. Armenta-Garcia, F. F. Gonzalez-Navarro and J. Caro-Gutierrez, "Wireless sensing applications with Wi-Fi Channel State Informa- tion, preprocessing techniques, and detection algorithms: A survey," in Computer Communicationsvol. 224, pp. 254-–274, June 2024, DOI: 10.1016/j.comcom.2024.06.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2024.06.011 2024

  7. [7]

    WiFi Sensing on the Edge: Signal Pro- cessing Techniques and Challenges for Real-World Systems,

    S. M. Hernandez and E. Bulut, "WiFi Sensing on the Edge: Signal Pro- cessing Techniques and Challenges for Real-World Systems," inIEEE Communications Surveys Tuts, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 46-76, 1Q 2023, DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2022.3209144

    work page doi:10.1109/comst.2022.3209144 2023

  8. [8]

    Commodity WiFi Sens- ing in Ten Y ears: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities,

    S. Tan, Y . Ren, J. Y ang and Y . Chen, "Commodity WiFi Sens- ing in Ten Y ears: Status, Challenges, and Opportunities,"IEEE In- ternet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 18, pp. 17832—17843. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3164569

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3164569 2022

  9. [9]

    CSI-based human sensing using model-based approaches: A survey,

    Z. Wang, Z. Huang, C. Zhang, W. Dou, Y . Guo and D. Chen, "CSI-based human sensing using model-based approaches: A survey," inJournal of Computational Design and Engineeringvol. 8, issue 2, pp. 510—523. Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/jcde/qwab003

    work page doi:10.1093/jcde/qwab003

  10. [10]

    Context Recog- nition by Wireless Sensing: A Comprehensive Survey,

    A. Uchiyama, S. Saruwatari, T. Maekawa and K. Ohara, "Context Recog- nition by Wireless Sensing: A Comprehensive Survey,"Journal of Infor- mation Processing, vol. 29, pp. 1—12. DOI: 10.2197/ipsjjip.29.1

    work page doi:10.2197/ipsjjip.29.1

  11. [11]

    WiFi Vision: Sensing, Recog- nition, and Detection with Commodity MIMO-OFDM WiFi,

    Y . He, Y . Chen, Y . Hu and B. Zeng, "WiFi Vision: Sensing, Recog- nition, and Detection with Commodity MIMO-OFDM WiFi,"IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 8296-–8317. DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2989426

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2020.2989426 2020

  12. [12]

    Y . Ma, G. Zhou and S. Wang,‘‘Wi-Fi sensing with channel state informa- tion: A survey,’’ACM Comput. Surveys, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 1-36, Jun. 2019, DOI: 10.1145/3310194

    work page doi:10.1145/3310194 2019

  13. [13]

    Widar3.0: Zero-Effort Cross-Domain Gesture Recognition With Wi-Fi,

    Y . Zhang, Y . Zheng, K. Qian, G. Zhang, Y . Liu, C. Wu and Z. Y ang, "Widar3.0: Zero-Effort Cross-Domain Gesture Recognition With Wi-Fi," IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 44, no. 11, pp. 8671-–8688, Nov. 2022, DOI :10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3105387

    work page doi:10.1109/tpami.2021.3105387 2022

  14. [14]

    Experimental Evaluation of WLAN-based Object Detection Using CSI in Outdoor and Large-scale Indoor Environments,

    S. Shimizu, O. Muta, T. Murakami, S. Otsuki and R. Otani, "Experimental Evaluation of WLAN-based Object Detection Using CSI in Outdoor and Large-scale Indoor Environments,"IEEE V ehicular Technology Confer- ence.DOI: 10.1109/VTC2024-Fall63153.2024.10757785

    work page doi:10.1109/vtc2024-fall63153.2024.10757785 2024

  15. [15]

    WiFi Sensing for Outdoor Surveillance,

    J. Li, A. Sharma, D. Mishra, J. G. Davis and A. Seneviratne, "WiFi Sensing for Outdoor Surveillance," in2022 56th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, Pacific Grove, CA, USA, Oct. 2022, pp. 834-836, DOI: 10.1109/IEEECONF56349.2022.10051917

    work page doi:10.1109/ieeeconf56349.2022.10051917 2022

  16. [16]

    Initial At- tempt on Outdoor Human Detection using IEEE 802.11ac WLAN Signal,

    M. Miyazaki, S. Ishida, A. Fukuda, T. Murakami and S. Otsuki, "Initial At- tempt on Outdoor Human Detection using IEEE 802.11ac WLAN Signal," inIEEE Sensors Applications Symposium (SAS), Sophia Antipolis, France, Mar. 2019, pp. 1—6, DOI: 10.1109/SAS.2019.8706126

    work page doi:10.1109/sas.2019.8706126 2019

  17. [17]

    WiHunter: Enabling Real- time Small Object Detection via Wireless Sensing,

    X. Zou, J. Liu, J. Han, W. Xi and Z. Wang, "WiHunter: Enabling Real- time Small Object Detection via Wireless Sensing," in2023 IEEE/ACM 31st International Symposium on Quality of Service (IWQoS), Orlando, FL, USA, 2023, pp. 01-10, DOI: 10.1109/IWQoS57198.2023.10188701

    work page doi:10.1109/iwqos57198.2023.10188701 2023

  18. [18]

    Sensing Fruit Ripeness Using Wireless Signals,

    S. Tan, L. Zhang and J. Y ang, "Sensing Fruit Ripeness Using Wireless Signals," in2018 27th International Conference on Computer Commu- nication and Networks, Hangzhou, China, Oct. 2018, DOI: 10.1109/IC- CCN.2018.8487344

    work page doi:10.1109/ic- 2018

  19. [19]

    On Multipath Link Characterization and Adaptation for Device-Free Human Detec- tion,

    Z. Zhou, Z. Y ang, C. Wu, Y . Liu and L. M. Ni, "On Multipath Link Characterization and Adaptation for Device-Free Human Detec- tion," inProceedings - International Conference on Distributed Com- puting Systems, Columbus, OH, USA, July 2015, pp. 389-398. DOI: 10.1109/ICDCS.2015.47

    work page doi:10.1109/icdcs.2015.47 2015

  20. [20]

    A Survey on Green Wireless Sensing: Energy-Efficient Sensing via WiFi CSI and Lightweight Learning,

    R. Koo, X. Liang, D. Mishra and A. Seneviratne, "A Survey on Green Wireless Sensing: Energy-Efficient Sensing via WiFi CSI and Lightweight Learning,"MDPI Energiesvol. 19, issue 2, DOI: 10.3390/en19020573

    work page doi:10.3390/en19020573

  21. [21]

    WiCPD: Wireless Child Presence Detection System for Smart Cars,

    X. Zeng, B. Wang, C. Wu, S. D. Regani and K. J. R. Liu, "WiCPD: Wireless Child Presence Detection System for Smart Cars," inIEEE In- ternet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 24866-24881, Dec. 2022, DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2022.3194873

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2022.3194873 2022

  22. [22]

    WiFi-CSI Difference Paradigm: Achieving Efficient Doppler Speed Esti- mation for Passive Tracking,

    W. Li, R. Gao, J. Xiong, J. Zhou, L. Wang, X. Mao, E. Yi and D. Zhang, "WiFi-CSI Difference Paradigm: Achieving Efficient Doppler Speed Esti- mation for Passive Tracking," inProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 8, no. 2, May 2024, DOI: 10.1145/3659608

    work page doi:10.1145/3659608 2024

  23. [23]

    MoSeFi: Duration Estimation Robust Human Motion Sensing via Commodity WiFi Device,

    X. Wang, L. Zhang, Q. Cheng and F. Shu, "MoSeFi: Duration Estimation Robust Human Motion Sensing via Commodity WiFi Device,"Wiley Wire- less Communications and Mobile Computing, vol. 2022, art. 1690602, Nov. 2022, DOI: 10.1155/2022/1690602

    work page doi:10.1155/2022/1690602 2022

  24. [24]

    Practical Issues and Challenges in CSI-based Integrated Sensing and Communication,

    D. Zhang, D. Wu, K. Niu, X. Wang, F. Zhang, J. Y ao, D. Jiang and F. Qin, "Practical Issues and Challenges in CSI-based Integrated Sensing and Communication," in2022 IEEE International Conference on Communica- tions Workshops (ICC Workshops), Seoul, Korea, May 2022, pp. 836-841, DOI: 10.1109/ICCWorkshops53468.2022.9814523. VOLUME 11, 2023 11 Suzukiet al.:...

    work page doi:10.1109/iccworkshops53468.2022.9814523 2022

  25. [25]

    Finger- Draw: Sub-wavelength level finger motion tracking with wifi signals,

    D. Wu, R. Gao, Y . Zeng, J. Liu, L. Wang, T. Gu and D. Zhang, "Finger- Draw: Sub-wavelength level finger motion tracking with wifi signals," in Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 4, no. 1, art. 31, Mar. 2020, DOI: 10.1145/3380981

    work page doi:10.1145/3380981 2020

  26. [26]

    FarSense: Pushing the range limit of Wi-Fi-based respiration sensing with CSI ratio of two antennas,

    Y . Zeng, D. Wu, J. Xiong, E. Yi, R. Gao and D. Zhang, “FarSense: Pushing the range limit of Wi-Fi-based respiration sensing with CSI ratio of two antennas,” inProceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies, vol. 3, issue 3, Sept. 2019, pp. 1-26, DOI: 10.1145/3351279

    work page doi:10.1145/3351279 2019

  27. [27]

    A Survey on Human Behavior Recognition Using Channel State In- formation,

    Z. Wang, K. Jiang, Y . Hou, W. Dou, C. Zhang, Z. Huang and Y . Guo, "A Survey on Human Behavior Recognition Using Channel State In- formation,"IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 155986-156024, Oct. 2019, DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2949123

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2019.2949123 2019

  28. [28]

    Understanding and modeling of Wi-Fi signal based human activity recognition,

    W. Wang, A. X. Liu and M. Shahzad, "Understanding and modeling of Wi-Fi signal based human activity recognition," inProceedings of the Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, MOBICOM, Sept. 2015, pp. 65-76, DOI: 10.1145/2789168.2790093

    work page doi:10.1145/2789168.2790093 2015

  29. [29]

    Indoor motion detection using Wi- Fi channel state information in flat floor environments versus in staircase environments

    Z. Dong, F. Li, J. Ying and K. Pahlavan, “Indoor motion detection using Wi- Fi channel state information in flat floor environments versus in staircase environments”,MDPI Sensors, vol. 18, no. 7, pp. 1-17, July 2018, DOI: 10.3390/s18072177

    work page doi:10.3390/s18072177 2018

  30. [30]

    Accessed: May 18, 2026

    Field Science Center, Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University. Accessed: May 18, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://tohoku.ac.jp

    2026

  31. [31]

    [Online]

    Japan Meteorological Agency, ‘‘Historical Weather Data Search: Kawatabi, Miyagi Prefecture.’’ Accessed: May 18, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.data.jma.go.jp/stats/etrn/index.php

    2026

  32. [32]

    [Online]

    Japan Meteorological Agency, ‘‘List of Automated Me- teorological Data Acquisition System (AMeDAS) Sta- tions,’’ Accessed: May 18, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/en/Activities/amedas/amedas.html

    2026

  33. [33]

    IEEE Standard for Information Technology—Telecommunications and Information Exchange Between Systems Local and Metropolitan Area Networks—Specific Requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications Amendment 4: Enhancements for V ery High Throughput for Operation in Bands below 6 GHz, IEEE Std 802.11ac-2...

    2013

  34. [34]

    Eliminating the Barriers: Demystifying Wi-Fi Base- band Design and Introducing the PicoScenes Wi-Fi Sensing Platform,

    Z. Jiang, T. H. Luan, X. Ren, D. Lv, H. Hao, J. Wang, K. Zhao, W. Xi, Y Xu and R. Li, "Eliminating the Barriers: Demystifying Wi-Fi Base- band Design and Introducing the PicoScenes Wi-Fi Sensing Platform," inIEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 6, Mar. 2022, DOI: 10.1109/JIOT.2021.3104666

    work page doi:10.1109/jiot.2021.3104666 2022

  35. [35]

    Development of Teaching Materials Visu- alaizing Relationships between Rainfall Intensity and Raindrop Size,

    Y . Naohiro and N. Kanako, “Development of Teaching Materials Visu- alaizing Relationships between Rainfall Intensity and Raindrop Size,” in Memoirs of Osaka Kyoiku University, Ser .V School Subjects and Allied Problems, Sept. 2013, DOI: 10.32287/td00027667

    work page doi:10.32287/td00027667 2013

  36. [36]

    The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air,

    R. Gunn and G. D. Kinzer, “The terminal velocity of fall for water droplets in stagnant air,”Journal of Meteorology, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 243—248, Aug. 1949, DOI: 10.1175/1520-0469(1949)006<0243:TTVOFF>2.0.CO;2. TOSHINORI SUZUKI(M’00) received the B.E., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, in 1987, 1989, a...

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1949)006 1949