pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.07442 · v2 · pith:OEM4WRWMnew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 💻 cs.CE

Tracing Stablecoin Contagion during the USDC Depeg after the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse

Krongtum Sankaewtong , Stefan Kitzler , Bernhard Haslhofer , Yuichi Ikeda This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 20:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE
keywords stablecoinscontagiondepegUSDCSVBon-chain analysissynchronizationcryptocurrency
0
0 comments X

The pith

The SVB collapse synchronized stablecoin transaction activity market-wide, but only USDC-related assets showed immediate price responses and volume surges, driving a shift to multi-coin portfolios.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines high-granularity on-chain transaction data around the March 2023 USDC depeg triggered by the Silicon Valley Bank collapse. It establishes that transaction activity across major stablecoins became strongly synchronized during the crisis window, pointing to a collective market-level response. The work identifies a bifurcated contagion pathway in which USDT, WBTC, and WETH primarily absorbed liquidity through larger trade volumes, while only USDC-related assets displayed immediate price deviations paired with surging transaction counts. This pattern reflects users reallocating from single-coin to multi-coin holdings in reaction to the shock. The findings matter because they map behavioral reorganization in fractional-reserve digital asset networks under stress.

Core claim

The central claim is that phase dynamics extracted from transaction timestamps reveal strong synchronization of activity across major stablecoins during the crisis, while price and volume responses split along asset lines: USDC-related tokens absorbed the direct behavioral impact through immediate depegging and transaction spikes, whereas other stablecoins and wrapped assets served mainly as liquidity channels. These effects occur against persistent intraday time-zone rhythms and balance-size heterogeneity, producing a mass reallocation from single-coin to multi-coin portfolios.

What carries the argument

Phase dynamics extraction applied to on-chain transaction timestamps, which quantifies synchronization and isolates the bifurcated contagion pathway from market-wide activity to account-level reallocation.

If this is right

  • Transaction synchronization serves as an early indicator of collective market response to stablecoin shocks.
  • USDC-related assets act as the primary channel for immediate user panic, while others absorb liquidity downstream.
  • Reallocation toward multi-coin portfolios emerges as the dominant behavioral adjustment during depegs.
  • Intraday time-zone rhythms and balance-size differences shape how the contagion unfolds in on-chain data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar synchronization metrics could be monitored in real time to detect emerging stablecoin stress before price depegs widen.
  • The observed reallocation pattern may generalize to other fractional-reserve crypto instruments under sudden liquidity shocks.
  • Regulatory stress tests for stablecoin issuers could incorporate on-chain synchronization thresholds as a complement to reserve audits.

Load-bearing premise

The SVB collapse functions as a clean exogenous shock whose effects can be isolated in on-chain data without confounding influences from exchange mechanics or off-chain activity.

What would settle it

Absence of measurable synchronization in transaction phase dynamics across stablecoins during the crisis window, or equal price and transaction responses across all assets rather than the USDC-specific pattern, would falsify the bifurcated pathway.

read the original abstract

The March 2023 collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) disrupted the core premise of stablecoins, which are digital tokens designed to maintain a fixed value against the U.S. dollar and serve as on-chain substitutes for dollar liquidity. The event triggered a sharp depeg of USDC, creating a rare exogenous shock to the stablecoin ecosystem. While price deviations during this crisis are well documented, the underlying behavioral reorganization of on-chain activity remains less understood. Here, we analyze high-granularity transaction data to measure the shock's effects on network activities, volumes, and prices, reconstructing the contagion pathway from market-wide synchronization down to account-level reallocation. By extracting phase dynamics, we first show that transaction activity across major stablecoins became strongly synchronized during the crisis window, indicating a collective market-level response. We then uncover a bifurcated contagion pathway. While USDT, WBTC, and WETH reacted primarily as liquidity absorption channels with larger trade volumes, only USDC-related assets exhibited immediate price responses alongside surging transaction counts. This reflects the dominant role of USDC-related assets in this incident and their immediate behavioral connection to user panic, driving a mass reallocation from single-coin to multi-coin portfolios. Finally, governed by persistent intraday time-zone rhythms and balance-size heterogeneity, these findings provide a comprehensive empirical framework for understanding systemic risk and flight-to-quality mechanisms in fractional-reserve digital asset networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes high-granularity on-chain transaction data for major stablecoins around the March 2023 SVB collapse and USDC depeg. It claims that transaction activity across stablecoins became strongly synchronized during the crisis window (indicating collective response), that a bifurcated contagion pathway exists with USDC-related assets showing immediate price responses and volume surges while USDT/WBTC/WETH primarily absorbed liquidity, and that this reflects user-driven mass reallocation from single- to multi-coin portfolios governed by time-zone rhythms and balance heterogeneity.

Significance. If the synchronization and bifurcation measures are shown to be robust and the on-chain patterns can be isolated from exchange mechanics, the work supplies an empirical framework for systemic risk and flight-to-quality dynamics in fractional-reserve stablecoin networks, extending price-only analyses of the event with network-activity metrics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Methods] Methods (phase-dynamics extraction): no error bars, statistical significance tests, or robustness checks (e.g., against shuffled null models or alternative window lengths) are reported for the synchronization claim; without these the central assertion of 'strongly synchronized' collective response cannot be evaluated quantitatively.
  2. [Results] Results (bifurcated pathway and reallocation inference): the interpretation that observed volume surges and price responses index 'user panic' and 'mass reallocation from single-coin to multi-coin portfolios' rests on treating all on-chain flows as user-level behavior; no account-type classification or controls for exchange hot-wallet rebalancing are described, leaving the behavioral claim vulnerable to the confounding factors noted in the stress-test.
  3. [Data and identification] Data and identification: the SVB event is treated as a clean exogenous shock isolable in on-chain data, yet no explicit exclusion criteria, pre/post matching, or falsification tests (e.g., placebo windows) are supplied to rule out correlated off-chain or exchange-driven patterns.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and introduction: several claims (e.g., 'governed by persistent intraday time-zone rhythms') are stated without reference to the specific figures or tables that demonstrate them.
  2. [Methods] Notation: 'phase dynamics' is introduced without an equation or algorithmic description in the main text, making replication difficult.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful comments, which have helped us identify areas for improvement in our manuscript. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] Methods (phase-dynamics extraction): no error bars, statistical significance tests, or robustness checks (e.g., against shuffled null models or alternative window lengths) are reported for the synchronization claim; without these the central assertion of 'strongly synchronized' collective response cannot be evaluated quantitatively.

    Authors: We agree that additional statistical validation would strengthen the synchronization analysis. In the revised version, we will report error bars for the phase synchronization metrics, conduct statistical significance tests, and include robustness checks using shuffled null models and alternative window lengths to quantitatively support the claim of strong synchronization during the crisis window. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results (bifurcated pathway and reallocation inference): the interpretation that observed volume surges and price responses index 'user panic' and 'mass reallocation from single-coin to multi-coin portfolios' rests on treating all on-chain flows as user-level behavior; no account-type classification or controls for exchange hot-wallet rebalancing are described, leaving the behavioral claim vulnerable to the confounding factors noted in the stress-test.

    Authors: This is a valid concern regarding the interpretation of on-chain data. Our analysis is based on aggregate transaction patterns rather than individual user identification, as on-chain data does not always allow for reliable account-type classification. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly discuss this limitation and temper the behavioral inferences accordingly, while maintaining the observed patterns in volumes and prices. If feasible with available data, we will explore basic controls for known exchange addresses. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Data and identification] Data and identification: the SVB event is treated as a clean exogenous shock isolable in on-chain data, yet no explicit exclusion criteria, pre/post matching, or falsification tests (e.g., placebo windows) are supplied to rule out correlated off-chain or exchange-driven patterns.

    Authors: We selected the analysis window based on the publicly documented timeline of the SVB collapse and subsequent USDC depeg. To address this point, the revised manuscript will include explicit exclusion criteria for the data periods, pre- and post-event comparisons, and falsification tests with placebo windows to help isolate the event-specific patterns from potential confounding factors. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Empirical on-chain analysis exhibits no circular derivation

full rationale

The paper performs an empirical reconstruction of contagion pathways using external high-granularity transaction data around the SVB event. Synchronization is measured via phase dynamics extraction on observed activity series, and the bifurcated response is identified by comparing price, volume, and count patterns across assets. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are described that would reduce these observations to quantities defined by the authors' own modeling choices. The central claims therefore remain independent of the inputs they analyze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on the assumption that the SVB event constitutes an exogenous shock whose on-chain effects can be cleanly isolated and that transaction timing and volume directly index user panic without major off-chain confounds.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The SVB collapse created an exogenous shock to the stablecoin ecosystem whose effects are measurable in on-chain data.
    Invoked in the first sentence of the abstract as the trigger for the observed depeg and subsequent reorganization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5802 in / 1313 out tokens · 21916 ms · 2026-06-27T20:08:38.455817+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Aharon, Shoaib Ali, and Muhammad Naved

    2 David Y. Aharon, Shoaib Ali, and Muhammad Naved. Too big to fail: The aftermath of silicon valley bank (svb) collapse and its impact on financial markets.Research in International Business and Finance, 66:102036, 2023.doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102036. 3 Md Akhtaruzzaman, Sabri Boubaker, and John W. Goodell. Did the collapse of silicon valley bank catalyz...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102036 2023

  2. [2]

    springer.com/article/10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8,doi:10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8

    URL:https://link. springer.com/article/10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8,doi:10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8. 7 Wajahat Azmi, Zaheer Anwer, Shujaat Naeem Azmi, and Haitham Nobanee. How did major global asset classes respond to silicon valley bank failure?Finance Research Letters, 56:104123,

    work page doi:10.1007/s42521-023-00088-8

  3. [3]

    Investigating the luna-terra collapse through the temporal multilayer graph structure of the ethereum stablecoin ecosystem

    8 Cheick Tidiane Ba, Ben Steer, Matteo Zignani, and Richard Clegg. Investigating the luna-terra collapse through the temporal multilayer graph structure of the ethereum stablecoin ecosystem. ACM Trans. Web, 19(3), August 2025.doi:10.1145/3726869. 9 Anton Badev and Cy Watsky. Interconnected DeFi: Ripple effects from the terra collapse.Finance and Economics...

    work page doi:10.1145/3726869 2025

  4. [4]

    10 Antonio Briola, David Vidal-Tomás, Yuanrong Wang, and Tomaso Aste

    URL: https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/feds/ interconnected-defi-ripple-effects-from-the-terra-collapse.htm , doi:10.17016/ feds.2023.044. 10 Antonio Briola, David Vidal-Tomás, Yuanrong Wang, and Tomaso Aste. Anatomy of a stablecoin’s failure: the terra-luna case.Finance Research Letters, 51:103358, January

    2023

  5. [5]

    11 Dirk Bullmann, Jonas Klemm, and Andrea Pinna.In search for stability in crypto-assets: are stablecoins the solution?Number

    URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1544612322005359, doi:10.1016/j.frl.2022.103358. 11 Dirk Bullmann, Jonas Klemm, and Andrea Pinna.In search for stability in crypto-assets: are stablecoins the solution?Number

    work page doi:10.1016/j.frl.2022.103358 2022

  6. [6]

    A token economics explanation for the de-pegging of the algorithmic stablecoin: Analysis of the case of terra.Ledger, 8, 4 2023.doi:10.5195/ledger.2023.283

    12 Jaewoo Cho. A token economics explanation for the de-pegging of the algorithmic stablecoin: Analysis of the case of terra.Ledger, 8, 4 2023.doi:10.5195/ledger.2023.283. 13 Thomas N. Cintra and Maxwell P. Holloway. Detecting depegs: Towards safer passive liquidity provision on curve finance, 2023.arXiv:2306.10612. 14 CoinGecko. CoinGecko: Cryptocurrency...

    work page doi:10.5195/ledger.2023.283 2023

  7. [7]

    16 Walter Hernandez Cruz, Jiahua Xu, Paolo Tasca, and Carlo Campajola

    URL:https: //papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4283333,doi:10.2139/ssrn.4283333. 16 Walter Hernandez Cruz, Jiahua Xu, Paolo Tasca, and Carlo Campajola. No questions asked: Effects of transparency on stablecoin liquidity during the collapse of silicon valley bank. Papers 2407.11716, arXiv.org, Jul

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.4283333

  8. [8]

    2139/ssrn.4217910

    URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4217910, doi:10. 2139/ssrn.4217910. 19 DefiLlama. DefiLlama: Defi and stablecoin analytics. https://defillama.com. Accessed: 2026-05-27. 20 Papa Ousseynou Diop, Julien Chevallier, and Bilel Sanhaji. Collapse of silicon valley bank and usdc depegging: A machine learning experiment.FinTech, 3(4):569–590,

    2026

  9. [9]

    21 Chuan Du, Ria Sonawane, and Cy Watsky

    doi: 10.3390/fintech3040030. 21 Chuan Du, Ria Sonawane, and Cy Watsky. In the shadow of bank runs: Lessons from the silicon valley bank failure and its impact on stablecoins. FEDS Notes, December

    work page doi:10.3390/fintech3040030

  10. [10]

    22 Erigon

    doi:10.17016/2380-7172.3958. 22 Erigon. Erigon (formerly turbo-geth).https://github.com/erigontech/erigon. Accessed: 2026-01-19. 23 European Parliament and Council of the European Union. Regulation (eu) 2023/1114 of the european parliament and of the council of 31 may 2023 on markets in crypto-assets (mica), June

    work page doi:10.17016/2380-7172.3958 2026

  11. [11]

    24 Gregory Gadzinski, Alessio Castello, Vito Liuzzi, and Patrice Sargenti

    URL:https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2023/1114/oj/eng. 24 Gregory Gadzinski, Alessio Castello, Vito Liuzzi, and Patrice Sargenti. Break a peg! a study of stablecoin co-instability.International Review of Financial Analysis, 96:103608,

    2023

  12. [12]

    25 Luca Galati and Francesco Capalbo

    doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103608. 25 Luca Galati and Francesco Capalbo. Silicon valley bank bankruptcy and stablecoins stability. International Review of Financial Analysis, 91:103001,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2024.103608 2024

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023. 103001. 26 Klaus Grobys, Juha Junttila, James W. Kolari, and Niranjan Sapkota. On the stability of stablecoins.Journal of Empirical Finance, 64:207–223, December

    work page doi:10.1016/j.irfa.2023 2023

  14. [14]

    URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927539821000761, doi: 10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.09.002. K. Sankaewtong, S. Kitzler, B. Haslhofer, and Y. Ikeda 21 27 Norden E. Huang, Zheng Shen, Steven R. Long, Manli C. Wu, Hsing H. Shih, Quanan Zheng, Nai-Chyuan Yen, Chi Chao Tung, and Henry H. Liu. The empirical mode decomposition and the hilbert s...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jempfin.2021.09.002 2021

  15. [15]

    33 Dun Li, Dezhi Han, Tien-Hsiung Weng, Zibin Zheng, Hongzhi Li, and Kuan-Ching Li

    doi: 10.1177/1536867X231212434. 33 Dun Li, Dezhi Han, Tien-Hsiung Weng, Zibin Zheng, Hongzhi Li, and Kuan-Ching Li. On Stablecoin: Ecosystem, architecture, mechanism and applicability as payment method.Comput. Stand. Interfaces, 87(C), January 2024.doi:10.1016/j.csi.2023.103747. 34 Shengchen Ling, Yuefeng Du, Yajin Zhou, Lei Wu, Cong Wang, Xiaohua Jia, an...

    work page doi:10.1177/1536867x231212434 2024

  16. [16]

    URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17622, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2506.17622

    arXiv:2506.17622 [cs]. URL:http://arxiv.org/abs/2506.17622, doi:10.48550/ arXiv.2506.17622. 35Jiageng Liu, Igor Makarov, and Antoinette Schoar. Anatomy of a run: The terra luna crash. Technical Report 4416677, Rochester, NY, April

    arXiv

  17. [17]

    36 Richard K

    URL:https://papers.ssrn.com/ abstract=4416677,doi:10.2139/ssrn.4416677. 36 Richard K. Lyons and Ganesh Viswanath-Natraj. What keeps stablecoins stable?Journal of In- ternational Money and Finance, 131:102777, March

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.4416677

  18. [18]

    com/science/article/pii/S0261560622001802,doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102777

    URL:https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/S0261560622001802,doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102777. 37 Yiming Ma, Yao Zeng, and Anthony Lee Zhang. Stablecoin runs and the centralization of arbitrage. NBER Working Paper 33882, National Bureau of Economic Research, May

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102777 2022

  19. [19]

    38 Ahmed Mahrous, Maurantonio Caprolu, and Roberto Di Pietro

    URL:https://www.nber.org/papers/w33882,doi:10.3386/w33882. 38 Ahmed Mahrous, Maurantonio Caprolu, and Roberto Di Pietro. Stablecoins: Fundamentals, emerging issues, and open challenges. Papers 2507.13883, arXiv.org, Jul

    work page doi:10.3386/w33882

  20. [20]

    SoK:Aclassificationframeworkforstablecoin designs

    39 AmaniMoin, KevinSekniqi, andEminGunSirer. SoK:Aclassificationframeworkforstablecoin designs. InFinancial Cryptography and Data Security: 24th International Conference, FC 2020, pages 174–197, Berlin, Heidelberg, February

    2020

  21. [21]

    40 Muhammad Naveed, Shoaib Ali, Mariya Gubareva, and Anis Omri

    Springer-Verlag.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-030-51280-4_11. 40 Muhammad Naveed, Shoaib Ali, Mariya Gubareva, and Anis Omri. When giants fall: Tracing the ripple effects of silicon valley bank (svb) collapse on global financial markets.Research in International Business and Finance, 67:102160, 2024.doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102160. 41 Nico Oefele, Dirk G. Baur, and ...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102160 2024

  22. [22]

    42 Dorcas Ofori-Boateng, Ignacio Segovia Dominguez, Murat Kantarcioglu, Cuneyt G

    doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111464. 42 Dorcas Ofori-Boateng, Ignacio Segovia Dominguez, Murat Kantarcioglu, Cuneyt G. Akcora, and Yulia R. Gel. Topological anomaly detection in dynamic multilayer blockchain networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01806,

    work page doi:10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111464 2023

  23. [23]

    44 Dharen Kumar Pandey, M

    URL:https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.06338,arXiv:2205.06338. 44 Dharen Kumar Pandey, M. Kabir Hassan, Vineeta Kumari, and Rashedul Hasan. Reper- cussions of the silicon valley bank collapse on global stock markets.Finance Research Letters, 55:104013, July

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    45 Baptiste Perez Riaza and Jean-Yves Gnabo

    URL: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S1544612323003859,doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104013. 45 Baptiste Perez Riaza and Jean-Yves Gnabo. Spillover effects of tether depegs on bitcoin jumps and crypto-asset market cojumps. Technical Report 4996933, Rochester, NY, September

    work page doi:10.1016/j.frl.2023.104013 2023

  25. [25]

    URL:https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4996933,doi:10.2139/ssrn.4996933. 46 M. Hashem Pesaran, Yongcheol Shin, and Richard J. Smith. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships.Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3):289–326,

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.4996933

  26. [26]

    47 Yujin Potter, Jihee Kim, Yongdae Kim, and Dawn Song

    doi:10.1002/jae.616. 47 Yujin Potter, Jihee Kim, Yongdae Kim, and Dawn Song. The trilemma of stablecoin. Tech- nical Report 3917430, Rochester, NY, September

    work page doi:10.1002/jae.616

  27. [27]

    48 Yujin Potter, Kornrapat Pongmala, Kaihua Qin, Ariah Klages-Mundt, Philipp Jovanovic, Christine Parlour, Arthur Gervais, and Dawn Song

    URL:https://papers.ssrn.com/ abstract=3917430,doi:10.2139/ssrn.3917430. 48 Yujin Potter, Kornrapat Pongmala, Kaihua Qin, Ariah Klages-Mundt, Philipp Jovanovic, Christine Parlour, Arthur Gervais, and Dawn Song. What drives the (In)stability of a stablecoin? pages 316–324, May

    work page doi:10.2139/ssrn.3917430

  28. [28]

    In: 2024 IEEE International Conference on Blockchain and Cryptocurrency (ICBC 2024)

    URL: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/ document/10634419,doi:10.1109/ICBC59979.2024.10634419. 49 Sotaro Sada, Keita Oikawa, Fusanori Iwasaki, and Yuichi Ikeda. International cooperation analysis of asian political distance network constructed using event data.Frontiers in Physics, 10, 2022.doi:10.3389/fphy.2022.1007796. 50 Sen. Hagerty, Bill. S.394 – ...

    work page doi:10.1109/icbc59979.2024.10634419 2024

  29. [29]

    52 Ivan Vynyavskyy, Stefan Kitzler, Bernhard Haslhofer, and Aviv Yaish

    URL:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pii/S037843712300599X,doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.129044. 52 Ivan Vynyavskyy, Stefan Kitzler, Bernhard Haslhofer, and Aviv Yaish. Modern portfolio theory in the crypto-wilderness, May

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physa.2023.129044 2023

  30. [30]

    Modern Portfolio Theory in the Crypto-Wilderness

    URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.20528, arXiv: 2605.20528. 53 Miklesh Prasad Yadav, Amar Rao, Mohammad Zoynul Abedin, Sabia Tabassum, and Brian Lucey. The domino effect: Analyzing the impact of silicon valley bank’s fall on top equity indices around the world.Finance Research Letters, 55:103952, 2023.doi:10.1016/j.frl. 2023.103952. 54 Imran Yousaf and John...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/j.frl 2023