pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.08827 · v1 · pith:GUWCDJLWnew · submitted 2026-06-07 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

High-dimensional inverse design of inertial fusion implosions via differentiable simulation

A. J. Crilly , P. Travis , J. P. Brodrick , J. B. Coughlin , A. S. Joglekar This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 17:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords inertial confinement fusiondifferentiable simulationautomatic differentiationinverse designlaser pulse optimizationdirect-drive implosionsOMEGA targetsgradient-based optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Automatic differentiation through a differentiable implosion model supplies gradients for optimizing 500-parameter laser pulses in fusion targets.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that a differentiable physics model of inertial confinement fusion implosions, driven by an external pressure pulse, can be differentiated automatically to yield gradients of performance objectives with respect to design parameters. This change makes gradient-based optimization tractable in spaces with hundreds of variables, such as the 500-parameter laser pulses explored for 25 kJ OMEGA-scale direct-drive targets. The method produces an optimized pulse shape that naturally rises in a near-isentropic manner without that requirement being imposed explicitly. Neural-network representations of the pulse are tested as a way to accelerate further searches over target geometries. The work therefore frames differentiable simulation as a route to inverse design where conventional black-box radiation-hydrodynamics codes become too costly.

Core claim

Automatic differentiation through a differentiable implosion physics model, driven by an external pressure pulse, provides gradients of implosion objectives with respect to design parameters, enabling gradient-based optimisation of 500-parameter laser pulses for 25 kJ OMEGA-scale direct-drive implosions. The optimised pulse recovers a near-isoentropic rise to peak power without that structure being imposed. Neural-network pulse parameterisations are additionally explored as a means of accelerating design-space exploration.

What carries the argument

Automatic differentiation through a differentiable implosion physics model driven by an external pressure pulse, which supplies exact gradients of objectives such as yield or convergence with respect to laser-pulse parameters.

If this is right

  • Gradient-based search scales to design spaces of 500 parameters for OMEGA-scale direct-drive targets.
  • An optimized pulse can produce near-isentropic compression without that feature being manually prescribed.
  • Neural-network pulse representations reduce the cost of exploring families of target geometries.
  • The same differentiable framework applies across sampled target geometries at fixed 25 kJ drive energy.
  • Further development of adjoint methods and higher-fidelity differentiable simulators is required to increase relevance.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same automatic-differentiation pipeline were coupled to a more complete radiation-hydrodynamics solver, joint optimization of target dimensions and driver parameters could become routine.
  • The natural emergence of isentropic behavior suggests the optimization landscape contains attractors aligned with physical stability criteria that may generalize to other drive energies.
  • Derivative-free methods such as genetic algorithms or Bayesian optimization would face exponentially higher sample costs in the same 500-dimensional space, making the gradient route a concrete efficiency gain.
  • The approach could be tested on existing OMEGA shot data by checking whether the recovered pulse shapes match or improve upon manually designed pulses used in prior campaigns.

Load-bearing premise

The simplified differentiable implosion physics model driven by an external pressure pulse sufficiently captures the coupled target-driver physics so that optimized designs remain relevant to real experiments.

What would settle it

Executing the 500-parameter optimized pulses in a full non-differentiable radiation-hydrodynamics code and verifying whether the predicted stagnation conditions and performance metrics agree with the differentiable model's objectives to within experimental tolerances.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.08827 by A. J. Crilly, A. S. Joglekar, J. B. Coughlin, J. P. Brodrick, P. Travis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the differentiable implosion design [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Plots showing the mean squared distance between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Figure showing results from highest performance sim [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Figure shows three well-performing optimisation tra [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Laser pulses (log scale) from the circled pulses in fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Number of optimisation iterations needed to exceed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Laser pulses from fig. 8 fine-tuned using a smaller [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Inertial confinement fusion implosion design requires simultaneous optimisation of strongly coupled target and driver parameters across high-dimensional design spaces. Existing automated design approaches typically rely on non-differentiable radiation-hydrodynamics codes treated as black boxes, making optimisation increasingly expensive as dimensionality grows. In this work, we present a differentiable simulation approach for high-dimensional inverse design of inertial confinement fusion implosions. Automatic differentiation through a differentiable implosion physics model, driven by an external pressure pulse, provides gradients of implosion objectives with respect to design parameters, enabling gradient-based optimisation. The framework is applied to 25 kJ OMEGA-scale direct-drive implosions, optimising 500-parameter laser pulses across sampled target geometries. The optimised pulse recovers a near-isoentropic rise to peak power without that structure being imposed. Neural-network pulse parameterisations are additionally explored as a means of accelerating design-space exploration. These results establish differentiable implosion modelling as a promising tool for ICF design, while motivating further work on adjoint robustness and higher-fidelity differentiable simulators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a differentiable simulation framework for high-dimensional inverse design of inertial confinement fusion (ICF) implosions. Automatic differentiation is applied through an implosion physics model driven by an external pressure pulse to compute gradients of implosion objectives with respect to design parameters. This enables gradient-based optimization of 500-parameter laser pulses for 25 kJ OMEGA-scale direct-drive targets across sampled geometries. The optimized pulses recover near-isentropic rise to peak power without explicit imposition of that structure. Neural-network pulse parameterizations are also explored to accelerate design-space exploration. The work positions differentiable modeling as a promising tool for ICF design while noting the need for higher-fidelity simulators.

Significance. If the gradients from the reduced model are reliable and the optimized designs translate to experiment, the approach would represent a meaningful advance over black-box radiation-hydrodynamics optimization by enabling efficient scaling to hundreds of parameters. The recovery of isentropic structure without imposition and the exploration of neural-network parameterizations are positive features. However, the significance is tempered by the reliance on a proxy model whose fidelity to full laser-plasma physics remains to be demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and method description] The central optimization results rest on a model driven by an external pressure pulse rather than explicit laser ray-tracing, inverse bremsstrahlung, or cross-beam energy transfer. No section provides a quantitative mapping from the optimized pressure pulse to realizable laser pulse parameters or a comparison of the resulting implosion metrics against a full-physics code; this directly affects whether the 500-parameter designs are relevant to OMEGA-scale direct-drive experiments.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework is applied to 'optimising 500-parameter laser pulses' yet the model is driven by an external pressure pulse. Without an explicit section detailing how the pressure-pulse parameterization corresponds to laser intensity, pulse shape, and beam geometry, it is unclear whether the gradient-based optimization actually optimizes laser parameters or only a proxy driver.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'higher-fidelity differentiable simulators' as future work; a brief discussion of the specific physics omitted in the current external-pressure model (e.g., laser imprint, CBET) would help readers assess the scope of the present results.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we will make to improve clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and method description] The central optimization results rest on a model driven by an external pressure pulse rather than explicit laser ray-tracing, inverse bremsstrahlung, or cross-beam energy transfer. No section provides a quantitative mapping from the optimized pressure pulse to realizable laser pulse parameters or a comparison of the resulting implosion metrics against a full-physics code; this directly affects whether the 500-parameter designs are relevant to OMEGA-scale direct-drive experiments.

    Authors: We agree that the model employs an external pressure pulse as a simplified driver rather than incorporating explicit laser-plasma physics such as ray-tracing, inverse bremsstrahlung absorption, or cross-beam energy transfer. This choice was made to maintain differentiability and enable gradient-based optimization in high dimensions. The 500-parameter designs optimize the temporal profile of this pressure pulse, which is intended as a proxy for the ablation pressure produced by a shaped laser pulse. No quantitative mapping to specific laser intensity, beam geometry, or full-physics code comparisons is provided in the current work. We will revise the manuscript to explicitly discuss this modeling choice and its implications as a limitation in the methods and conclusions sections, thereby clarifying that the results demonstrate the differentiable framework rather than claiming direct experimental applicability of the specific designs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that the framework is applied to 'optimising 500-parameter laser pulses' yet the model is driven by an external pressure pulse. Without an explicit section detailing how the pressure-pulse parameterization corresponds to laser intensity, pulse shape, and beam geometry, it is unclear whether the gradient-based optimization actually optimizes laser parameters or only a proxy driver.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes an inconsistency between the abstract wording and the model description. The pressure-pulse parameterization is constructed to allow flexible temporal shapes analogous to those achievable with laser pulse shaping on OMEGA, but it does not directly optimize laser intensity or account for beam geometry effects. We will revise the abstract to specify 'optimising 500-parameter pressure pulses that serve as proxies for laser pulses' and add a short clarifying paragraph in the methods section describing the intended correspondence between the pressure pulse and laser drive. These changes will resolve the ambiguity without altering the technical content of the optimization results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained

full rationale

The paper introduces automatic differentiation through a differentiable implosion physics model (driven by external pressure pulse) to enable gradient-based optimization of high-dimensional laser pulse parameters. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs: the optimization produces designs within the stated model, without claiming external predictions from fitted parameters or renaming known results. No self-citation chains or uniqueness theorems are invoked to force the central result. The framework is presented as a new methodological tool, with explicit caveats on model fidelity, confirming the derivation chain stands independently.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted; the model is described at a high level without specifics.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5731 in / 1065 out tokens · 25831 ms · 2026-06-27T17:33:59.941756+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 47 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    SoftwareX , volume=

    ExactPack: A python library of exact analytic solutions , author=. SoftwareX , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  2. [2]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Approaching hydro-equivalent ignition in laser direct-drive via target design optimization using novel statistical modeling , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  3. [3]

    2025 , url=

    Christopher Rackauckas , title=. 2025 , url=

    2025

  4. [4]

    2021 , journal=

    Patrick Kidger and Cristian Garcia , title=. 2021 , journal=

    2021

  5. [5]

    Risk , volume=

    Smoking adjoints: Fast monte carlo greeks , author=. Risk , volume=

  6. [6]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10298 , year=

    Anode: Unconditionally accurate memory-efficient gradients for neural odes , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.10298 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1902

  7. [7]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02435 , year=

    On neural differential equations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.02435 , year=

    arXiv

  8. [8]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    An experimentally informed design process for future inertial confinement fusion facilities , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  9. [9]

    James Bradbury and Roy Frostig and Peter Hawkins and Matthew James Johnson and Yash Katariya and Chris Leary and Dougal Maclaurin and George Necula and Adam Paszke and Jake Vander

  10. [10]

    The journal of chemical physics , volume=

    Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines , author=. The journal of chemical physics , volume=. 1953 , publisher=

    1953

  11. [11]

    2009 , publisher=

    The elements of statistical learning , author=. 2009 , publisher=

    2009

  12. [12]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Comparison of tungsten versus molybdenum for double shell capsules using machine learning design optimization , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  13. [13]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Coupling 1D xRAGE simulations with machine learning for graded inner shell design optimization in double shell capsules , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  14. [14]

    Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal , volume=

    Bayesian batch optimization for molybdenum versus tungsten inertial confinement fusion double shell target design , author=. Statistical Analysis and Data Mining: The ASA Data Science Journal , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  15. [15]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Particle swarm optimization of 1D isochoric compression designs for fast ignition , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  16. [16]

    Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=

    Simulations and experiments of the growth of the “tent” perturbation in NIF ignition implosions , author=. Journal of Physics: Conference Series , volume=. 2016 , organization=

    2016

  17. [17]

    O'Neill, S. T. and Appelbe, B. D. and Crilly, A. J. and Walsh, C. A. and Strozzi, D. J. and Moody, J. D. and Chittenden, J. P. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0242215 , url =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0242215 2025

  18. [18]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A mechanism for reduced compression in indirectly driven layered capsule implosions , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  19. [19]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Modeling ablator defects as a source of mix in high-performance implosions at the National Ignition Facility , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  20. [20]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Instability seeding mechanisms due to internal defects in inertial confinement fusion targets , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  21. [21]

    2013 , publisher=

    Laser-plasma interactions and applications , author=. 2013 , publisher=

    2013

  22. [22]

    2013 , school=

    Active learning for level set estimation , author=. 2013 , school=

    2013

  23. [23]

    Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , volume=

    Bayesian calibration of computer models , author=. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology) , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  24. [24]

    Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=

    Nonlinear information fusion algorithms for data-efficient multi-fidelity modelling , author=. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  25. [25]

    Optical Engineering , volume=

    The national ignition facility , author=. Optical Engineering , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  26. [26]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.14507040 , url =

    Beckett, George and Beech-Brandt, Josephine and Leach, Kieran and Payne, Zöe and Simpson, Alan and Smith, Lorna and Turner, Andy and Whiting, Anne , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.14507040 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.14507040

  27. [27]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A pushered capsule implosion as an alternate approach to the ignition regime for inertial confinement fusion , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  28. [28]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=

    Energy gain of wetted-foam implosions with auxiliary heating for inertial fusion studies , author=. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  29. [29]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A future of inertial confinement fusion without laser-plasma instabilities , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  30. [30]

    Conference on robot learning , pages=

    Rethinking optimization with differentiable simulation from a global perspective , author=. Conference on robot learning , pages=. 2023 , organization=

    2023

  31. [31]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10680 , year=

    Affordable, manageable, practical, and scalable (AMPS) high-yield and high-gain inertial fusion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.10680 , year=

    arXiv

  32. [32]

    Exploring the parameter space of MagLIF implosions using similarity scaling. II. Current scaling , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  33. [33]

    Fusion science and technology , volume=

    Progress in 2 mm glow discharge polymer mandrel development for NIF , author=. Fusion science and technology , volume=. 2004 , publisher=

    2004

  34. [34]

    Fusion Science and Technology , volume=

    Metrology Feasibility Study in Support of the National Direct-Drive Program , author=. Fusion Science and Technology , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  35. [35]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Impact of stalk on directly driven inertial confinement fusion implosions , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  36. [36]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Inertially confined fusion plasmas dominated by alpha-particle self-heating , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  37. [37]

    Nuclear Fusion , volume=

    A 3D dynamic model to assess the impacts of low-mode asymmetry, aneurysms and mix-induced radiative loss on capsule performance across inertial confinement fusion platforms , author=. Nuclear Fusion , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  38. [38]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Hohlraum reheating from burning NIF implosions , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  39. [39]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Growth rates of the ablative Rayleigh--Taylor instability in inertial confinement fusion , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 1998 , publisher=

    1998

  40. [40]

    The Physics of fluids , volume=

    Self-consistent growth rate of the Rayleigh--Taylor instability in an ablatively accelerating plasma , author=. The Physics of fluids , volume=. 1985 , publisher=

    1985

  41. [41]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Progress toward a self-consistent set of 1D ignition capsule metrics in ICF , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  42. [42]

    The distribution of points in a cube and the accurate evaluation of integrals (in Russian) Zh , author=. Vychisl. Mat. i Mater. Phys , volume=

  43. [43]

    Crilly, Aidan , title =

  44. [44]

    Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=

    Combining multi-fidelity modelling and asynchronous batch Bayesian Optimization , author=. Computers & Chemical Engineering , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  45. [45]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Unexpected improvements to expected improvement for bayesian optimization , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  46. [46]

    Synthetic Biology: Methods and Protocols , pages=

    Machine Learning for Biological Design , author=. Synthetic Biology: Methods and Protocols , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  47. [47]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 , year=

    Decoupled weight decay regularization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    BoTorch: A framework for efficient Monte-Carlo Bayesian optimization , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  49. [49]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  50. [50]

    Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

    Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles , author=. Advances in neural information processing systems , volume=

  51. [51]

    Machine learning , volume=

    Random forests , author=. Machine learning , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  52. [52]

    URL https://www

    The kernel cookbook: Advice on covariance functions , author=. URL https://www. cs. toronto. edu/duvenaud/cookbook , year=

  53. [53]

    2003 , publisher=

    The design and analysis of computer experiments , author=. 2003 , publisher=

    2003

  54. [54]

    2006 , publisher=

    Gaussian processes for machine learning , author=. 2006 , publisher=

    2006

  55. [55]

    Information Sciences , volume=

    Dropout injection at test time for post hoc uncertainty quantification in neural networks , author=. Information Sciences , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  56. [56]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Effects of laser bandwidth in direct-drive high-performance DT-layered implosions on the OMEGA laser , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  57. [57]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Shock timing technique for the National Ignition Facility , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2001 , publisher=

    2001

  58. [58]

    Physical Review Letters , volume=

    Linear stability analysis of laser-driven spherical implosions , author=. Physical Review Letters , volume=. 1974 , publisher=

    1974

  59. [59]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A model of laser imprinting , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  60. [60]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Irradiation uniformity for high-compression laser-fusion experiments , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 1999 , publisher=

    1999

  61. [61]

    Journal of Applied Physics , volume=

    Uniformity of energy deposition for laser driven fusion , author=. Journal of Applied Physics , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

    1983

  62. [62]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    A wave-based model for cross-beam energy transfer in direct-drive inertial confinement fusion , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  63. [63]

    Moloney, Philip , title =

  64. [64]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Data-driven prediction of scaling and ignition of inertial confinement fusion experiments , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  65. [65]

    Nature Physics , volume=

    Inertial-confinement fusion with lasers , author=. Nature Physics , volume=. 2016 , publisher=

    2016

  66. [66]

    Design of an inertial fusion experiment exceeding the Lawson criterion for ignition , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025201 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.025201 2022

  67. [67]

    Experimental achievement and signatures of ignition at the National Ignition Facility , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.106.025202 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.106.025202 2022

  68. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00093 , year=

    Infuence of mass ablation on ignition and burn propagation in layered fusion capsules , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.00093 , year=

    arXiv

  69. [69]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Biermann battery magnetic fields in ICF capsules: Total magnetic flux generation , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  70. [70]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Magnetic field transport in propagating thermonuclear burn , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  71. [71]

    1992 , publisher=

    User's reference guide for odrpack version 2.01: Software for weighted orthogonal distance regression , author=. 1992 , publisher=

    1992

  72. [72]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16464 , year=

    SpK: A fast atomic and microphysics code for the high-energy-density regime , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.16464 , year=

    arXiv

  73. [73]

    Journal of Applied Physics , volume=

    A generalized forward fit for neutron detectors with energy-dependent response functions , author=. Journal of Applied Physics , volume=. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  74. [74]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, Daniel and Hogg, David W. and Lang, Dustin and Goodman, Jonathan , year=. emcee: The MCMC Hammer , volume=. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific , publisher=. doi:10.1086/670067 , number=

    work page doi:10.1086/670067

  75. [75]

    Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=

    The five line-of-sight neutron time-of-flight (nToF) suite on the National Ignition Facility (NIF) , author=. Review of Scientific Instruments , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  76. [76]

    Measurements of the temperature and velocity of the dense fuel layer in inertial confinement fusion experiments , author =. Phys. Rev. E , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.105.055205 , url =

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.105.055205 2022

  77. [77]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume=

    Neutron backscatter edges as a diagnostic of burn propagation , author=. Physics of Plasmas , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  78. [78]

    Hurricane,O. A. and Maclaren,S. A. and Rosen,M. D. and Hammer,J. H. and Springer,P. T. and Betti,R. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2021 , doi =

    2021

  79. [79]

    Bulletin of the American Physical Society , volume=

    Hotspot power balance in alpha-particle dominated ICF implosions , author=. Bulletin of the American Physical Society , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  80. [80]

    Nature , volume=

    Burning plasma achieved in inertial fusion , author=. Nature , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

Showing first 80 references.