Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 68 references

Bridging nanoparticle morphology and viscoelastic behavior in epoxy nanocomposites: A coarse-grained simulation-informed constitutive model

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A coarse-grained simulation-informed constitutive model predicts the viscoelastic behavior of epoxy nanocomposites across strain rates, temperatures, and nanoparticle contents.

desk verdict The paper links CG simulations to a viscoelastic constitutive model for epoxy nanocomposites with some held-out validation, but the morphology transfer from sim to experiment stays unverified. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.09279 v1 pith:R7S23FPR submitted 2026-06-08 cs.CE

Atiyeh Hentea , Shadab Zakavatib , Behrouz Arash , Maximilian Jux , Raimund Rolfes This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CE
keywords epoxynanocompositescoarse-grainedsimulationconstitutivemodelnanoparticlemorphologyviscoelasticityhyperelasticitythermomechanicalbehavioragglomeratesize
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper develops an integrated framework that uses large-scale coarse-grained molecular simulations to inform a constitutive model for nanoparticle-filled epoxy materials. The model accounts for how the amount and size of nanoparticle agglomerates affect nonlinear hyperelastic response, softening, and dependence on loading rate and temperature. It demonstrates good agreement with experiments over wide ranges of conditions and validates its predictions on additional test data not used for calibration. A sympathetic reader would care because this simulation-driven method can reduce the amount of physical testing needed to characterize and optimize such advanced materials for engineering use.

What carries the argument

The CG simulation-informed constitutive model, which incorporates the effects of nanoparticle content and agglomerate size obtained from molecular simulations into a continuum-level description of the material's hyperelastic and viscoelastic behavior.

What would settle it

New experiments at nanoparticle sizes or weight fractions outside those used for parameter identification, or at strain rates and temperatures not in the validation set, would falsify the claim if the model predictions show large deviations from measured responses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The key discovery is that parameters derived from coarse-grained simulations of nanoparticle morphology and distribution can be used to construct a constitutive model that successfully reproduces the thermomechanical response of epoxy nanocomposites, including nonlinear hyperelasticity and rate- and temperature-dependent properties, and that this model retains predictive accuracy when tested against independent experimental datasets.

Load-bearing premise

The coarse-grained simulations accurately capture the real nanoparticle morphology, agglomerate size distribution, and their interaction with the epoxy matrix, allowing direct transfer of identified parameters to experimental conditions.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The framework allows prediction of material behavior for different nanoparticle weight fractions and sizes using simulation data.
  • It captures softening behavior and nonlinear effects under varying thermomechanical loads.
  • Validation on unseen data confirms the model's ability to generalize beyond the identification dataset.
  • This approach minimizes the need for extensive experimental campaigns in developing constitutive models for nanocomposites.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the transferability from simulations to experiments holds, the method could accelerate design of nanocomposites by allowing virtual exploration of filler morphologies.
  • Similar integration of CG simulations might apply to other matrix-filler systems to predict their rate-dependent properties.
  • A testable extension would be to use the model to forecast behavior at extreme temperatures or strain rates and verify with targeted experiments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an integrated framework that uses large-scale coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations to characterize the effects of nanoparticle content and agglomerate size on the rate- and temperature-dependent viscoelastic response of epoxy nanocomposites, then feeds those parameters into a constitutive model that captures nonlinear hyperelasticity, softening, and thermomechanical dependence. The model is claimed to be predictive on held-out experimental data not used in parameter identification, thereby reducing reliance on extensive physical testing.

Significance. If the CG-to-experiment parameter transfer is shown to be faithful, the work would offer a practical route to simulation-driven constitutive modeling for nanocomposites, potentially lowering experimental burden while maintaining accuracy across strain rates, temperatures, filler fractions, and sizes.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph) and framework description: the central claim that parameters extracted from CG simulations transfer directly to predict held-out experimental data is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation (e.g., simulated vs. measured agglomerate-size histograms, radial distribution functions at the filler-matrix interface, or interface traction-separation curves) that the CG morphology and mechanical coupling match experimental conditions. Without such evidence the apparent predictive success could arise from fitting rather than physical transfer.
  2. [Abstract] The validation statement in the abstract asserts use of data excluded from parameter identification, but the manuscript does not report the specific partitioning procedure, the number of held-out conditions, or error metrics (e.g., stress-strain RMSE per temperature/strain-rate bin) that would allow assessment of whether the transfer is robust or post-hoc.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the presentation of our validation approach. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details on the validation procedure and supporting evidence for the CG-to-constitutive model transfer.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph) and framework description: the central claim that parameters extracted from CG simulations transfer directly to predict held-out experimental data is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no quantitative validation (e.g., simulated vs. measured agglomerate-size histograms, radial distribution functions at the filler-matrix interface, or interface traction-separation curves) that the CG morphology and mechanical coupling match experimental conditions. Without such evidence the apparent predictive success could arise from fitting rather than physical transfer.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative comparisons (e.g., agglomerate-size distributions or interface RDFs) between CG simulations and experiments would provide stronger support for physical parameter transfer. The manuscript currently demonstrates transfer through the predictive accuracy of the resulting constitutive model on held-out macroscopic data, with CG simulations used to systematically vary filler content and agglomerate size to extract rate- and temperature-dependent parameters. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) in the methods or results that reports any available morphology statistics from the CG trajectories, describes how interface parameters were selected to be consistent with experimental dispersion observations, and clarifies the multi-scale linkage. If certain direct metrics were not computed, we will state this explicitly and note the indirect validation via constitutive-model performance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] The validation statement in the abstract asserts use of data excluded from parameter identification, but the manuscript does not report the specific partitioning procedure, the number of held-out conditions, or error metrics (e.g., stress-strain RMSE per temperature/strain-rate bin) that would allow assessment of whether the transfer is robust or post-hoc.

    Authors: We accept this observation. While the abstract states that validation used data excluded from parameter identification, the manuscript does not detail the partitioning scheme, the exact number of held-out conditions, or quantitative error metrics. In the revised version we will expand the validation section (and update the abstract if space permits) to specify: (i) the procedure used to designate held-out experiments, (ii) the number of held-out temperature/strain-rate/filler combinations, and (iii) tabulated error metrics such as stress-strain RMSE or R² values broken down by temperature and strain-rate bins. This will allow readers to evaluate the robustness of the transfer. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; validation uses held-out experimental data

full rationale

The paper's framework extracts parameters for the constitutive model from CG simulations and identifies them via a process that explicitly excludes certain experimental data, then validates predictions on those held-out data. This separation means the claimed predictive success is tested against external benchmarks rather than reducing to the fitting inputs by construction. No self-definitional relations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation chain. The approach is self-contained against the stated external validation, consistent with a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the central claim rests on the unstated premise that CG simulations faithfully map to experimental morphology and mechanics.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Bridging nanoparticle morphology and viscoelastic behavior in epoxy nanocomposites: A coarse-grained simulation-informed constitutive model." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/R7S23FPR

@misc{pith2026260609279,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Bridging nanoparticle morphology and viscoelastic behavior in epoxy nanocomposites: A coarse-grained simulation-informed constitutive model},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/R7S23FPR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.09279}
}
read the original abstract

Accurate prediction of the material behavior of polymer nanocomposites under various thermomechanical loading conditions is increasingly demanded for engineering applications. This study proposes an integrated framework combining coarse-grained (CG) molecular simulations and experimental testing to develop predictive constitutive models for nanoparticle/epoxy nanocomposites. The key contribution of this work lies in characterizing the influence of nanoparticle content and agglomerate size on the rate- and temperature-dependent behavior of nanocomposites, enabled by large-scale CG simulations. The proposed framework successfully captures the material response, including nonlinear hyperelasticity, softening behavior, and rate- and temperature-dependent properties, across a broad range of strain rates, temperatures, and nanoparticle sizes and weight fractions. The predictive capability of the CG simulation-informed constitutive model is validated using additional experimental data that were not included in the parameter identification process. By reducing reliance on extensive experimental testing while maintaining high accuracy, this simulation-driven approach offers an efficient pathway for developing robust, predictive constitutive models for designing and optimizing advanced nanocomposites.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.09279 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. One-dimensional schematic representation of the constitutive model. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Flowchart of the proposed simulation-informed constitutive modeling framework. The CG simulation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Molecular structures of (a) a bisphenol-A-diglycidylether monomer and (b) a 4-methyl-1,2- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (20 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Curing reaction mechanism between DGEBA epoxy and anhydride curing agent. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Molecular structures of (a) the unit cell of the crystalline structure of boehmite. (b) X-Y direction [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) A DGEBA epoxy monomer for all-atom representation and its corresponding A CG bead, (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Four layer boehmite structure with the size of 20 Å and its corresponding CG bead denoted by P. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Schematic picture of dog-bone test specimen prepared for the testing. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Tensile test device with extensometer until failure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Stress–strain relationship of the pure epoxy obtained from CG simulations. Simulation data points [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Variation of σy of a pure epoxy system with respect to the simulation box side length at a strain rate of ϵ˙ = 108 1/s. lation boxes with side lengths varying from 60 to 110 Å are simulated. The uncured system is initially subjected to an energy minimization to find a…
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Stress–strain response obtained by CG simulations (a) at various strain rates at room temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Yield stress as a function of strain rate obtained from CG simulations at three different temperatures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: BNP agglomerates with 3, 40, and 80 primary particles, covering agglomerate sizes ranging from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: A cured simulation box of CG model with a size of 280 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: (a) Variation ratio of the effective Young’s modulus of the BNP/epoxy nanocomposites with respect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Detailed variation of the activation energy ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_17.png]
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Detailed variation of the pre-exponential factor ratio of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_18.png]
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: Detailed variation of the athermal yield stress [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_19.png]
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: Stress–strain response of dispersed BNP/epoxy nanocomposites (10 wt%) predicted by the full [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_20.png]
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Effect of strain rate (a) and temperature (b) on the stress–strain relationship of the epoxy system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_21.png]
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Effect of strain rate (a) and temperature (b) on the stress–strain relationship of BNP(10 wt%)/epoxy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_22.png]
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Effect of the epoxy matrix reinforced by (a) agglomerated BNPs and (b) well dispersed BNPs on [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_23.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    S. H. Zaferani, Introduction of polymer-based nanocomposites, in: Polymer-based nanocomposites for energy and environmental applications, Elsevier, 2018, pp. 1–25. 34

    2018

  2. [2]

    Fu, X.-Q

    S.-Y. Fu, X.-Q. Feng, B. Lauke, Y.-W. Mai, Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites, Composites Part B: Engineering 39 (6) (2008) 933–961

    2008

  3. [3]

    M. Jux, B. Finke, T. Mahrholz, M. Sinapius, A. Kwade, C. Schilde, Effects of al (oh) o nanoparticle agglomerate size in epoxy resin on tension, bending, and fracture properties, Journal of Nanoparticle Research 19 (4) (2017) 139

    2017

  4. [4]

    Unger, B

    R. Unger, B. Arash, W. Exner, R. Rolfes, Effect of temperature on the viscoelastic damage behaviour of nanoparticle/epoxy nanocomposites: Constitutive modelling and experimental validation, Polymer 191 (2020) 122265

    2020

  5. [5]

    Fankhänel, D

    J. Fankhänel, D. Silbernagl, M. Ghasem Zadeh Khorasani, B. Daum, A. Kempe, H. Sturm, R. Rolfes, Mechanical properties of boehmite evaluated by atomic force mi- croscopy experiments and molecular dynamic finite element simulations, Journal of Nano- materials 2016 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Kausar, A review of current knowledge and future trends in polymer/boehmite nanocomposites, Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting (2021) 87560879211043558

    A. Kausar, A review of current knowledge and future trends in polymer/boehmite nanocomposites, Journal of Plastic Film & Sheeting (2021) 87560879211043558

    2021

  7. [7]

    Y. Zare, K. Y. Rhee, Accounting the reinforcing efficiency and percolating role of in- terphase regions in tensile modulus of polymer/cnt nanocomposites, European Polymer Journal 87 (2017) 389–397

    2017

  8. [8]

    Uddin, C

    M. Uddin, C. Sun, Improved dispersion and mechanical properties of hybrid nanocom- posites, Composites science and Technology 70 (2) (2010) 223–230

    2010

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Sapiai, A

    N. Sapiai, A. Jumahat, N. Manap, M. A. I. Usoff, Effect of nanofillers dispersion on mechanical properties of clay/epoxy and silica/epoxy nanocomposites, Jurnal Teknologi 76 (9) (2015)

    2015

  2. [10]

    Arash, S

    B. Arash, S. Zakavati, B. Bahtiri, M. Jux, R. Rolfes, Phase-field modeling of fracture in viscoelastic–viscoplastic thermoset nanocomposites under cyclic and monolithic loading, Engineering with Computers 41 (1) (2025) 681–701

    2025

  3. [11]

    Hente, B

    A. Hente, B. Arash, R. Rolfes, Optimization assisted coarse-grained modeling of agglom- erated nanoparticle reinforced thermosetting polymers, Polymer 225 (2021) 123741. 35

    2021

  4. [12]

    Hente, B

    A. Hente, B. Arash, M. Jux, R. Rolfes, Enhancement of fracture properties of amorphous polymers by nanoparticles: A machine-learning assisted coarse-grained model, Materials Today Communications (2025) 113185

    2025

  5. [13]

    Li, Y.-Z

    M. Li, Y.-Z. Gu, H. Liu, Y.-X. Li, S.-K. Wang, Q. Wu, Z.-G. Zhang, Investigation the interphase formation process of carbon fiber/epoxy composites using a multiscale simulation method, Composites science and technology 86 (2013) 117–121

    2013

  6. [14]

    Jang, H.-I

    H.-K. Jang, H.-I. Kim, T. Dodge, P. Sun, H. Zhu, J.-D. Nam, J. Suhr, Interfacial shear strength of reduced graphene oxide polymer composites, Carbon 77 (2014) 390–397

    2014

  7. [15]

    Y. Li, S. Wang, B. Arash, Q. Wang, A study on tribology of nitrile-butadiene rubber com- posites by incorporation of carbon nanotubes: Molecular dynamics simulations, Carbon 100 (2016) 145–150

    2016

  8. [16]

    Unger, U

    R. Unger, U. Braun, J. Fankhänel, B. Daum, B. Arash, R. Rolfes, Molecular modelling of epoxy resin crosslinking experimentally validated by near-infrared spectroscopy, Com- putational Materials Science 161 (2019) 223–235

    2019

  9. [17]

    J. Chen, B. Li, B. Gu, B. Sun, Molecular dynamics insights into temperature-dependent interfacial properties and failure behaviors of carbon fiber/epoxy composites, Composite Structures (2025) 119758

    2025

  10. [18]

    Arash, H

    B. Arash, H. S. Park, T. Rabczuk, Mechanical properties of carbon nanotube reinforced polymer nanocomposites: A coarse-grained model, Composites Part B: Engineering 80 (2015) 92–100

    2015

  11. [19]

    A. A. Mousavi, B. Arash, X. Zhuang, T. Rabczuk, A coarse-grained model for the elastic properties of cross linked short carbon nanotube/polymer composites, Composites Part B: Engineering 95 (2016) 404–411

    2016

  12. [20]

    Arash, H

    B. Arash, H. S. Park, T. Rabczuk, Tensile fracture behavior of short carbon nanotube reinforced polymer composites: A coarse-grained model, Composite Structures 134 (2015) 981–988

    2015

  13. [21]

    J. Li, Z. Li, H. Gong, Y. Li, J. Jiang, Coarse-grained molecular dynamics study of modulus transition and effects of debonding condition on debonding behavior at fiber- resin interfaces, Composite Structures (2025) 119749. 36

    2025

  14. [22]

    Ricci, N

    E. Ricci, N. Vergadou, Integrating machine learning in the coarse-grained molecular sim- ulation of polymers, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B 127 (11) (2023) 2302–2322

    2023

  15. [23]

    Zhang, R

    X.-Z. Zhang, R. Shi, Z.-Y. Lu, H.-J. Qian, Chemically specific systematic coarse-grained polymer model with both consistently structural and dynamical properties, JACS Au 4 (3) (2024) 1018–1030

    2024

  16. [24]

    X. Fu, T. Xie, N. J. Rebello, B. D. Olsen, T. Jaakkola, Simulate time-integrated coarse-grained molecular dynamics with multi-scale graph networks, arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.10348 (2022)

    2022

  17. [25]

    Weeratunge, D

    H. Weeratunge, D. Robe, A. Menzel, A. W. Phillips, M. Kirley, K. Smith-Miles, E. Ha- jizadeh, Bayesian coarsening: rapid tuning of polymer model parameters, Rheologica Acta 62 (10) (2023) 477–490

    2023

  18. [26]

    P. Ray, A. P. Generale, N. Vankireddy, Y. Asoma, M. Nakauchi, H. Lee, K. Yoshida, Y. Okuno, S. R. Kalidindi, Refining coarse-grained molecular topologies: a bayesian optimization approach, npj Computational Materials 11 (1) (2025) 234

    2025

  19. [27]

    Ivanov, M

    M. Ivanov, M. Posysoev, A. P. Lyubartsev, Coarse-grained modeling using neural net- works trained on structural data, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 19 (19) (2023) 6704–6717

    2023

  20. [28]

    M. O. Wilson, D. M. Huang, Anisotropic molecular coarse-graining by force and torque matching with neural networks, The Journal of Chemical Physics 159 (2) (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    E. M. Arruda, M. C. Boyce, A three-dimensional constitutive model for the large stretch behavior of rubber elastic materials, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 41 (2) (1993) 389–412

    1993

  22. [30]

    Kontou, Viscoplastic deformation of an epoxy resin at elevated temperatures, Journal of applied polymer science 101 (3) (2006) 2027–2033

    E. Kontou, Viscoplastic deformation of an epoxy resin at elevated temperatures, Journal of applied polymer science 101 (3) (2006) 2027–2033

    2006

  23. [31]

    A. D. Drozdov, A. Dorfmann, The effect of temperature on the viscoelastic response of rubbery polymers at finite strains, Acta mechanica 154 (1) (2002) 189–214

    2002

  24. [32]

    Arash, W

    B. Arash, W. Exner, R. Rolfes, A viscoelastic damage model for nanoparticle/epoxy nanocomposites at finite strain: A multiscale approach, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 128 (2019) 162–180. 37

    2019

  25. [33]

    Arash, W

    B. Arash, W. Exner, R. Rolfes, Viscoelastic damage behavior of fiber reinforced nanoparticle-filled epoxy nanocomposites: multiscale modeling and experimental vali- dation, in: Acting Principles of Nano-Scaled Matrix Additives for Composite Structures, Springer, 2021, pp. 377–410

    2021

  26. [34]

    Arash, R

    B. Arash, R. Unger, W. Exner, R. Rolfes, A finite deformation gradient-enhanced damage model for nanoparticle/polymer nanocomposites: An atomistically-informed multiscale approach, Composite Structures 258 (2021) 113211

    2021

  27. [35]

    J. Yin, X. Wang, W. Tang, X. Xu, S. Zhao, F.-z. Xuan, A multiscale model for predicting mechanical properties of polymer composites, Chemical Engineering Science 282 (2023) 119352

    2023

  28. [36]

    Yazdanparast, R

    R. Yazdanparast, R. Rafiee, A 3d viscoelastic–viscoplastic behavior of carbon nanotube- reinforced polymers: constitutive model and experimental characterization, Polymer Composites 45 (7) (2024) 6425–6438

    2024

  29. [37]

    K. Xu, L. Liu, Z. Zhao, G. Luo, W. Chen, Development of a hygrothermal constitutive model for epoxy resin considering the glass transition temperature and its applications, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences 261 (2024) 108697

    2024

  30. [38]

    Bahtiri, B

    B. Bahtiri, B. Arash, S. Scheffler, M. Jux, R. Rolfes, A machine learning-based viscoelastic–viscoplastic model for epoxy nanocomposites with moisture content, Com- puter Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 415 (2023) 116293

    2023

  31. [39]

    Bahtiri, B

    B. Bahtiri, B. Arash, S. Scheffler, M. Jux, R. Rolfes, A thermodynamically consistent physics-informed deep learning material model for short fiber/polymer nanocomposites, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 427 (2024) 117038

    2024

  32. [40]

    K.Upadhyay, J.N.Fuhg, N.Bouklas, K.Ramesh, Physics-informeddata-drivendiscovery of constitutive models with application to strain-rate-sensitive soft materials, Computa- tional Mechanics (2024) 1–30

    2024

  33. [41]

    Guth, On the hydrodynamical theory of the viscosity of suspensions, Phys

    E. Guth, On the hydrodynamical theory of the viscosity of suspensions, Phys. Rev 53 (1938) 322–325

    1938

  34. [42]

    Guth, Theory of filler reinforcement, Rubber Chemistry and Technology 18 (3) (1945) 596–604

    E. Guth, Theory of filler reinforcement, Rubber Chemistry and Technology 18 (3) (1945) 596–604. 38

    1945

  35. [43]

    J. S. Bergstrom, M. C. Boyce, Mechanical behavior of particle filled elastomers, Rubber chemistry and technology 72 (4) (1999) 633–656

    1999

  36. [44]

    D. L. Henann, L. Anand, A large strain isotropic elasticity model based on molecular dynamics simulations of a metallic glass, Journal of Elasticity 104 (1) (2011) 281–302

    2011

  37. [45]

    H. Xiao, L. Chen, Hencky’s elasticity model and linear stress-strain relations in isotropic finite hyperelasticity, Acta Mechanica 157 (1) (2002) 51–60

    2002

  38. [46]

    L. H. Sperling, Introduction to physical polymer science, John Wiley & Sons, 2005

    2005

  39. [47]

    A. S. Argon, M. Bessonov, Plastic deformation in polyimides, with new implications on the theory of plastic deformation of glassy polymers, Philosophical Magazine 35 (4) (1977) 917–933

    1977

  40. [48]

    H. Qi, M. Boyce, Constitutive model for stretch-induced softening of the stress–stretch behavior of elastomeric materials, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 52 (10) (2004) 2187–2205

    2004

  41. [49]

    Miehe, J

    C. Miehe, J. Keck, Superimposed finite elastic–viscoelastic–plastoelastic stress response with damage in filled rubbery polymers. experiments, modelling and algorithmic imple- mentation, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 48 (2) (2000) 323–365

    2000

  42. [50]

    H. J. Qi, M. C. Boyce, Stress–strain behavior of thermoplastic polyurethanes, Mechanics of materials 37 (8) (2005) 817–839

    2005

  43. [51]

    Kitagawa, Power law relationship between yield stress and shear modulus for glassy polymers, Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition 15 (9) (1977) 1601–1611

    M. Kitagawa, Power law relationship between yield stress and shear modulus for glassy polymers, Journal of Polymer Science: Polymer Physics Edition 15 (9) (1977) 1601–1611

    1977

  44. [52]

    Arash, S

    B. Arash, S. Zakavati, T. Rabczuk, A phase-field framework for anisotropic viscoelastic- viscoplastic fracture in short fiber-reinforced polymers in hygrothermal environments, Engineering Fracture Mechanics (2026) 112219

    2026

  45. [53]

    M. Jux, J. Fankhänel, B. Daum, T. Mahrholz, M. Sinapius, R. Rolfes, Mechanical prop- erties of epoxy/boehmite nanocomposites in dependency of mass fraction and surface modification-an experimental and numerical approach, Polymer 141 (2018) 34–45

    2018

  46. [54]

    M. G. Z. Khorasani, D. Silbernagl, P. Szymoniak, V.-D. Hodoroaba, H. Sturm, The effect of boehmite nanoparticles (γ-alooh) on nanomechanical and thermomechanical properties correlated to crosslinking density of epoxy, Polymer 164 (2019) 174–182. 39

    2019

  47. [55]

    Tunega, H

    D. Tunega, H. Pašalić, M. Gerzabek, H. Lischka, Theoretical study of structural, mechan- ical and spectroscopic properties of boehmite (γ-alooh), Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 23 (40) (2011) 404201

    2011

  48. [56]

    Bokhimi, J

    X. Bokhimi, J. Toledo-Antonio, M. Guzman-Castillo, F. Hernandez-Beltran, Relationship between crystallite size and bond lengths in boehmite, Journal of Solid State Chemistry 159 (1) (2001) 32–40

    2001

  49. [57]

    A. Kiss, G. Keresztury, L. Farkas, Raman and ir spectra and structure of boehmite (γ- alooh). evidence for the recently discarded d172h space group, Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular Spectroscopy 36 (7) (1980) 653–658

    1980

  50. [58]

    Pascale, P

    Y.Noel, R.Demichelis, F. Pascale, P. Ugliengo, R. Orlando, R. Dovesi, Abinitio quantum mechanical study ofγ-alooh boehmite: structure and vibrational spectrum, Physics and Chemistry of Minerals 36 (1) (2009) 47–59

    2009

  51. [59]

    S. L. Mayo, B. D. Olafson, W. A. Goddard, A generic force field for molecular simulations, J. Phys. Chem 94 (26) (1990) 8897–8909

    1990

  52. [60]

    Fankhänel, B

    J. Fankhänel, B. Arash, R. Rolfes, Elastic interphase properties of nanoparticle/epoxy nanocomposites: A molecular dynamics study, Composites Part B: Engineering 176 (2019) 107211

    2019

  53. [61]

    Lebowitz, D

    J. Lebowitz, D. Zomick, Mixtures of hard spheres with nonadditive diameters: Some exact results and solution of py equation, The Journal of Chemical Physics 54 (8) (1971) 3335–3346

    1971

  54. [62]

    Martínez, R

    L. Martínez, R. Andrade, E. Birgin, J. Martínez, Software news and update packmol: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations, J. Comput. Chem 30 (13) (2009) 2157–2164

    2009

  55. [63]

    Melchionna, G

    S. Melchionna, G. Ciccotti, B. Lee Holian, Hoover npt dynamics for systems varying in shape and size, Molecular Physics 78 (3) (1993) 533–544

    1993

  56. [64]

    Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, Journal of computational physics 117 (1) (1995) 1–19

    S. Plimpton, Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics, Journal of computational physics 117 (1) (1995) 1–19. 40

    1995

  57. [65]

    A. Stukowski, Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with ovito–the open visualization tool, Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering 18 (1) (2009) 015012

    2009

  58. [66]

    Dünweg, K

    B. Dünweg, K. Kremer, Microscopic verification of dynamic scaling in dilute polymer solutions: A molecular-dynamics simulation, Physical review letters 66 (23) (1991) 2996

    1991

  59. [67]

    Unger, W

    R. Unger, W. Exner, B. Arash, R. Rolfes, Non-linear viscoelasticity of epoxy resins: Molecular simulation-based prediction and experimental validation, Polymer 180 (2019) 121722

    2019

  60. [68]

    D. E. Golberg, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning, Addison wesley 1989 (102) (1989) 36. 41

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.