pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10009 · v1 · pith:OUJS6C4Znew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Decadal pre-explosion activity and circumstellar interaction in a supernova

Ting-Wan Chen , Amar Aryan , Sheng Yang , Stephen J. Smartt , Takashi J. Moriya , Se\'an J. Brennan , Maximilian D. Stritzinger , Bailey Martin
show 47 more authors
Matt Nicholl Albert K. H. Kong James H. Gillanders Anirban Dutta Brian P. Schmidt Yu-Chi Cheng Mark E. Huber Cheng-Han Lai Chien-Hsiu Lee Yu-Hsing Lee Chow-Choong Ngeow Ken W. Smith Christopher Ashall Katie Auchettl Chris R. Burns Kenneth C. Chambers Zhi-Yue Chen Thomas de Boer Eric Y. Hsiao Khoa Ngo Thanh Ho Willem B. Hoogendam David O. Jones Erkki Kankare Tom L. Killestein Hanindyo Kuncarayakti Meng-Han Lee Chuan-Jui Li Chien-Cheng Lin Christopher Lidman Thomas B. Lowe Eugene A. Magnier Kyle Medler Anais M\"oller Thomas Moore Nidia Morrell Gregory S. H. Paek Cameron M. Pfeffer Da-Chun Qiang Liana Rauf Thomas M. Reynolds Aiswarya Sankar.K Shubham Srivastav Jack Tweddle Richard Wainscoat Ze-Ning Wang Huangfei Xiao Zonghong Zhu
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:23 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords supernovacircumstellar materialpre-explosion activitystripped-envelope progenitormass lossSN 2026gzfX-ray transientoptical excess
0
0 comments X

The pith

Interaction with 0.02 solar masses of circumstellar material powers the early excess in SN 2026gzf while archival images show 12 years of pre-explosion brightening.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents rapid optical observations of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova SN 2026gzf starting 1.25 hours after an X-ray detection, revealing a luminous blue excess on the first day that cannot be explained by radioactive decay alone. The authors show that this excess arises from the supernova ejecta colliding with approximately 0.02 solar masses of nearby circumstellar material. Archival Pan-STARRS images of the site demonstrate variability over the prior 12 years, including a factor of 1.5 brightening in the final 3 years before explosion. This variability supplies direct evidence of eruptive mass loss in a stripped-envelope progenitor during its late oxygen-burning phase, with a possible silicon-burning episode creating the compact material seen in the X-ray signal. The observations connect the star's long-term changes to the explosion and its immediate surroundings.

Core claim

Interaction between the ejecta and approximately 0.02 solar masses of circumstellar material accounts for the early optical excess in SN 2026gzf. Archival Pan-STARRS images show variability at the explosion site over the previous 12 years, with the source brightening by a factor of approximately 1.5 in the final 3 years before explosion. This provides evidence for pre-explosion activity in a stripped-envelope progenitor system, with the precursor brightening indicating enhanced eruptive mass loss during late-stage oxygen burning before core collapse.

What carries the argument

Ejecta interaction with a compact shell of approximately 0.02 solar masses of circumstellar material, detected through the first-day optical excess and supported by long-term archival photometric variability at the explosion site.

If this is right

  • The precursor brightening indicates enhanced eruptive mass loss during oxygen burning in the final years before core collapse.
  • An additional silicon-burning episode shortly before explosion likely produced the compact circumstellar material that generated the X-ray shock-breakout signal.
  • Stripped-envelope progenitors can modify their immediate environment through mass loss on timescales of years to a decade before death.
  • The combination of early circumstellar interaction and archival variability links the explosion mechanism to observable pre-explosion changes in the progenitor.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Deep archival surveys of other nearby core-collapse sites could reveal similar late-stage variability in additional stripped-envelope events.
  • The inferred circumstellar mass suggests that eruptive episodes may occur frequently enough to affect the light curves of a measurable fraction of Type Ic supernovae.
  • X-ray transients detected by wide-field monitors may commonly be followed by optical excesses when the progenitor has shed material in the years before explosion.

Load-bearing premise

The variability recorded in archival Pan-STARRS images comes from the progenitor star itself rather than unrelated background sources, variable seeing, or photometric artifacts.

What would settle it

Independent re-reduction of the same Pan-STARRS archival frames showing no variability at the exact supernova position, or spectroscopy and imaging at the site after the supernova fades that reveal a different source responsible for the pre-explosion flux changes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10009 by Aiswarya Sankar.K, Albert K. H. Kong, Amar Aryan, Anais M\"oller, Anirban Dutta, Bailey Martin, Brian P. Schmidt, Cameron M. Pfeffer, Cheng-Han Lai, Chien-Cheng Lin, Chien-Hsiu Lee, Chow-Choong Ngeow, Chris R. Burns, Christopher Ashall, Christopher Lidman, Chuan-Jui Li, Da-Chun Qiang, David O. Jones, Eric Y. Hsiao, Erkki Kankare, Eugene A. Magnier, Gregory S. H. Paek, Hanindyo Kuncarayakti, Huangfei Xiao, Jack Tweddle, James H. Gillanders, Katie Auchettl, Kenneth C. Chambers, Ken W. Smith, Khoa Ngo Thanh Ho, Kyle Medler, Liana Rauf, Mark E. Huber, Matt Nicholl, Maximilian D. Stritzinger, Meng-Han Lee, Nidia Morrell, Richard Wainscoat, Se\'an J. Brennan, Sheng Yang, Shubham Srivastav, Stephen J. Smartt, Takashi J. Moriya, Thomas B. Lowe, Thomas de Boer, Thomas Moore, Thomas M. Reynolds, Ting-Wan Chen, Tom L. Killestein, Willem B. Hoogendam, Yu-Chi Cheng, Yu-Hsing Lee, Ze-Ning Wang, Zhi-Yue Chen, Zonghong Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Discovery and early optical evolution of SN 2026gzf. Upper panel, From left to right: the LOT r-band discovery image obtained by Kinder, the Pan-STARRS r-band reference image, the corresponding difference image, and a Pan-STARRS colour composite (i/r/g). The red cross marks the position of SN 2026gzf. The transient position is coincident with a blue compact source. Lower panel, Multi-band light curves of S… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Spectroscopic evolution of SN 2026gzf. Rest-frame spectral sequence of SN 2026gzf from +9 to +43 days relative to the X-ray trigger (T0 = MJD = 61120.516). Optical spectra from NOT, ANU 2.3-m/WiFeS and LOT are shown together with NIR spectra from Keck II/NIRES and IRTF/SpeX. All spectra are normalized and vertically offset for clarity. The coloured curves show the displayed binned spectra, while the grey c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Precursor activities of SN 2026gzf. Historical Pan-STARRS w-band data show variability at the progenitor site over the final ∼ 12 years before the SN explosion. Owing to the lack of earlier w-band coverage, we cannot exclude the possibility that similar activity was already present at earlier times. The precursor brightened from an average w ≈ 22.8 mag (Mw ≈ −13.2 mag) during −12 to −3 yr before explosion … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Schematic scenario for SN 2026gzf. Left, precursor activity over at least the ∼ 12 years before explosion produces CSM around the progenitor system. Middle, at t=0, the star explodes inside this nearby dense CSM, giving rise to the soft X-ray flash detected by Einstein Probe. Right, by t> 1.25 h, interaction between the rapidly expanding SN ejecta and the nearby CSM contributes to the bright, blue first-da… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Model spectra of SN2026gzf at three different epochs. The observed spectra have been [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Astrometric association between the historical blue compact source, the Pan-STARRS precursor residuals, and SN 2026gzf. Top, archival cutouts of the explosion site from DECam r, Subaru r, SDSS r, and Pan-STARRS w, registered to a common astrometric frame. The coloured crosshairs mark the independently measured centroid of the blue compact source in each dataset. Bottom, sky coordinate comparison of the mea… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Long-term pre-explosion variability and the early rise of SN 2026gzf. Left, historical photometry measured at the explosion site from Pan-STARRS, ZTF, Subaru, and DECam. The pre-explosion measurements are based on direct aperture photometry at a fixed position and without template subtraction, in order to track the total flux at the site of the blue compact source in a survey consistent way. For each epoch… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MOSFiT fit to the multi-band optical light curve of SN 2026gzf. The points show the observed photometry, while the solid curves show the best-fit 56Ni-powered model based on the Arnett formalism. Data earlier than MJD 61123 were excluded from the fit because the model does not include shock-cooling or circumstellar-interaction emission. The model reproduces the main peak well in all bands and yields an exp… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Lightcurve evolution of SN 2026gzf and comparison with other SNe. The upper panels, (a) and (b), compare the rest-frame red- and blue-band light curves of SN 2026gzf with those of the Ic-BL SNe 1998bw, 2006aj, 2018gep, 2020bvc and 2020lao, together with the recent EP-discovered events SNe 2024gsa, 2025kg and 2025wkm. SN 2008D is also shown, although it was a Type Ib SN. All light curves are plotted relativ… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of the long-term precursor activity of SN 2026gzf with other transients. Absolute magnitude is shown as a function of rest-frame time in years relative to the peak luminosity of the main eruption or SN light curve of each object. Time 0 marks the peak, so all points shown correspond to precursor activity before the main event. The blue and red points show the archival Pan-STARRS w- and r-band m… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Host-galaxy colour image and WiFeS IFU maps of the host galaxy of SN 2026gzf. Left: SDSS colour image of the host galaxy of SN 2026gzf, with the red rectangle representing the WiFeS FoV for our observations, and the position of the SN marked as a green cross. The region in purple contains sufficient WiFeS S/N per spaxel for host-property estimation, and this region was used to extract global properties of… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Best-fit SED focusing specifically on the smaller galaxy hosting SN 2026gzf. By utilizing photometry restricted to the smaller galaxy, the model characterizes the stellar population and dust properties of the host component while minimizing light contamination from the larger primary galaxy. The blue solid line represents the best-fit model spectrum, while red circles with error bars denote the observed m… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Best-fit SED for the entire galaxy system. This system consists of a larger primary galaxy and a smaller companion hosting SN 2026gzf. Symbols and colour schemes are identical to those in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p060_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

When a massive star explodes as a supernova, crucial information about its immediate environment is lost within hours. Here we report rapid optical observations from Lulin Observatory of the broad-lined Type Ic supernova SN 2026gzf, beginning 1.25 hours after Einstein Probe detected the X-ray transient EP260321a. Our data led to the discovery of the optical counterpart and showed a luminous blue first-day excess that cannot be reproduced by standard radioactive models. We find that interaction between the ejecta and $\approx 0.02$ M$_{\odot}$ of circumstellar material accounts for the early excess. Archival Panoramic Survey Telescope and Rapid Response System (Pan-STARRS) images show variability at the explosion site over the previous $\sim 12$ years, with the source brightening by a factor of $\sim 1.5$ in the final $\sim 3$ years before explosion, providing rare evidence for pre-explosion activity in a stripped-envelope progenitor system. The precursor brightening suggests enhanced eruptive mass loss during late-stage oxygen burning before core collapse, while an additional silicon-burning episode shortly before explosion may have created the compact nearby material responsible for the X-ray shock-breakout signal. SN 2026gzf therefore offers the first view of how a stripped progenitor modifies its immediate environment shortly before death, linking long-term precursor variability, circumstellar interaction and the explosion itself.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports rapid optical follow-up of broad-lined Type Ic SN 2026gzf beginning 1.25 hours after the X-ray transient EP260321a, revealing a luminous blue first-day excess. This excess is attributed to ejecta interaction with ≈0.02 M⊙ of circumstellar material. Archival Pan-STARRS imaging shows variability at the site over ~12 years, including a factor ~1.5 brightening in the final ~3 years, interpreted as evidence for pre-explosion eruptive mass loss during oxygen burning in a stripped-envelope progenitor; an additional silicon-burning episode is suggested to explain the compact CSM responsible for the X-ray signal.

Significance. If the archival variability is confirmed to originate from the progenitor, the work supplies rare observational linkage between long-term precursor activity, compact CSM, and the explosion in a stripped-envelope system, with implications for late-stage mass loss and progenitor evolution. The multi-epoch, multi-wavelength dataset (X-ray to optical plus archival) strengthens the case for such connections when the central assumptions hold.

major comments (2)
  1. [Archival Pan-STARRS analysis] Archival Pan-STARRS photometry section: the interpretation that the reported ~1.5× brightening over the final ~3 years (and variability over ~12 years) traces enhanced eruptive mass loss by the progenitor is load-bearing for the 'rare evidence for pre-explosion activity' claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit validation (difference imaging, reference-star light curves, or PSF positional coincidence) to exclude background sources, variable seeing, or reduction artifacts at the explosion site.
  2. [CSM interaction modeling] Early-excess modeling (results section): the statement that interaction with ≈0.02 M⊙ of CSM accounts for the luminous blue excess is presented as the preferred solution, but the manuscript does not detail the full parameter space explored, the assumed CSM density profile, the quantitative exclusion of alternative energy sources, or the formal uncertainty on the fitted mass; this value is explicitly a fit rather than a first-principles derivation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and text: the supernova is referred to as SN 2026gzf while the X-ray transient is EP260321a; ensure consistent naming and cross-referencing throughout.
  2. [Discussion] The claim of providing the 'first view' of a stripped progenitor modifying its environment should be tempered with appropriate literature citations if analogous cases have been reported.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper accordingly to improve clarity and robustness.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Archival Pan-STARRS analysis] Archival Pan-STARRS photometry section: the interpretation that the reported ~1.5× brightening over the final ~3 years (and variability over ~12 years) traces enhanced eruptive mass loss by the progenitor is load-bearing for the 'rare evidence for pre-explosion activity' claim, yet the manuscript provides no explicit validation (difference imaging, reference-star light curves, or PSF positional coincidence) to exclude background sources, variable seeing, or reduction artifacts at the explosion site.

    Authors: We agree that the archival section would be strengthened by explicit validation steps. In the revised manuscript we will add difference imaging results for the Pan-STARRS epochs, light curves of nearby reference stars demonstrating photometric stability, and a quantitative check confirming that the variable source is coincident with the supernova position to within the local PSF. These additions will directly address concerns about possible artifacts or unrelated background variability. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [CSM interaction modeling] Early-excess modeling (results section): the statement that interaction with ≈0.02 M⊙ of CSM accounts for the luminous blue excess is presented as the preferred solution, but the manuscript does not detail the full parameter space explored, the assumed CSM density profile, the quantitative exclusion of alternative energy sources, or the formal uncertainty on the fitted mass; this value is explicitly a fit rather than a first-principles derivation.

    Authors: We will expand the early-excess modeling subsection to include the explored parameter ranges, the adopted CSM density profile (a steady wind with ρ ∝ r^{-2}), a quantitative comparison showing why radioactive heating or shock-cooling models fail to reproduce the observed blue color and rapid rise, and the formal 1σ uncertainties returned by the fitting procedure. While the quoted mass is indeed obtained from model fitting, these additions will make the analysis and its limitations fully transparent. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; observational claims rest on direct data and standard fitting

full rationale

The paper reports new observations of SN 2026gzf starting 1.25 hours post-detection and analyzes archival Pan-STARRS images for variability over ~12 years. The CSM mass of ≈0.02 M⊙ is obtained by fitting an interaction model to the early luminous excess, presented explicitly as an accounting for the data rather than a first-principles derivation or renamed prediction. No self-citations, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes from prior author work are invoked to support the central claims about pre-explosion activity or CSM interaction. The chain is self-contained against external benchmarks (light-curve data and imaging), with the variability attribution treated as an interpretive step rather than a constructed equivalence.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that standard radioactive-decay light-curve models are complete and that any excess must be CSM interaction; the 0.02 M⊙ value is obtained by fitting rather than predicted.

free parameters (1)
  • CSM mass = 0.02 M_sun
    Value of approximately 0.02 solar masses fitted to reproduce the first-day blue excess after radioactive models failed.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard radioactive-decay supernova light-curve models are sufficient to rule out a purely radioactive origin for the early excess.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the need for an additional CSM-interaction component.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6070 in / 1350 out tokens · 22677 ms · 2026-06-27T15:23:53.100137+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pinning Down the Geometry of the Type Ic Broad-Line Supernova 2026gzf

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spectropolarimetry of SN 2026gzf indicates mostly spherical ejecta with axisymmetric Ca distribution viewed at ~40° from symmetry axis.

  2. Discovery of a Supernova Following the Einstein Probe Transient EP250302a at z = 1.131

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper identifies supernova emission matching a scaled SN 1998bw template in the late-time light curve of EP250302a at z=1.131, with early data constraining the jet Lorentz factor above 25.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Nature442, 1008–1010 (2006).astro-ph/0603279

    Campana, S.et al.The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave. Nature442, 1008–1010 (2006).astro-ph/0603279

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  2. [9]

    Lee, M.-H.et al.EP260321a: Kinder observations detect a blue variable star and set limits on a source from the z =0.034 galaxy within the error circle.GRB Coordinates Network44070, 1 (2026)

    2026

  3. [11]

    MNRAS328, 1039–1063 (2001).astro-ph/0106498

    Colless, M.et al.The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: spectra and redshifts. MNRAS328, 1039–1063 (2001).astro-ph/0106498

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  4. [23]

    G.et al.The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary

    York, D. G.et al.The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary. AJ120, 1579–1587 (2000).astro-ph/0006396

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  5. [26]

    E., Heger, A

    Woosley, S. E., Heger, A. & Weaver, T. A. The evolution and explosion of massive stars. Reviews of Modern Physics74, 1015–1071 (2002)

    2002

  6. [27]

    S.et al.Supernova progenitors, their variability and the Type IIP Supernova ASASSN-16fq in M66

    Kochanek, C. S.et al.Supernova progenitors, their variability and the Type IIP Supernova ASASSN-16fq in M66. MNRAS467, 3347–3360 (2017).1609.00022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  7. [29]

    & Katz, B

    Waxman, E. & Katz, B. Shock Breakout Theory. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae, 967 (2017)

    2017

  8. [30]

    P., Gayley, K

    Owocki, S. P., Gayley, K. G. & Shaviv, N. J. A Porosity-Length Formalism for Photon-Tiring-limited Mass Loss from Stars above the Eddington Limit. ApJ616, 525–541 (2004).astro-ph/0409573

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  9. [31]

    Fuller, J. & Ro, S. Pre-supernova outbursts via wave heating in massive stars - II. Hydrogen-poor stars. MNRAS476, 1853–1868 (2018).1710.04251

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  10. [32]

    ApJ986, L4 (2025).2503.16243

    Hamidani, H.et al.EP240414a: A Gamma-Ray Burst Jet Weakened by an Extended Circumstellar Material. ApJ986, L4 (2025).2503.16243

    arXiv 2025

  11. [33]

    & Zhang, B

    Zheng, J.-H., Zhu, J.-P., Lu, W. & Zhang, B. EP240414a: Off-axis View of a Jet-cocoon System from an Expanded Progenitor Star. ApJ985, 21 (2025).2503.24266

    arXiv 2025

  12. [41]

    A&A 617, A105 (2018).1806.10613

    Japelj, J.et al.Host galaxies of SNe Ic-BL with and without long gamma-ray bursts. A&A 617, A105 (2018).1806.10613

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [42]

    ApJ892, 153 (2020).1901

    Modjaz, M.et al.Host Galaxies of Type Ic and Broad-lined Type Ic Supernovae from the Palomar Transient Factory: Implications for Jet Production. ApJ892, 153 (2020).1901. 00872

    2020

  14. [43]

    blue compact source

    Srivastav, S.et al.Identification of the Optical Counterpart of the Fast X-Ray Transient EP240414a. ApJ978, L21 (2025).2409.19070. 17 Methods 1 X-ray shock breakout Einstein Probe (EP)[6] is a space X-ray mission designed to monitor the soft X-ray sky for transient phenomena and to perform rapid onboard follow-up of newly discovered events. By combining t...

    arXiv 2025

  15. [44]

    & Ling, Z

    Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y . & Ling, Z. The Einstein Probe Mission. In Bambi, C. & Sangangelo, A. (eds.)Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics, 86 (2022)

    2022

  16. [45]

    J.et al.EP260321a: Einstein Probe detection of an X-ray transient.GRB Coordinates Network44068, 1 (2026)

    Huang, Q. J.et al.EP260321a: Einstein Probe detection of an X-ray transient.GRB Coordinates Network44068, 1 (2026)

    2026

  17. [46]

    J.et al.EP260321a: refined analysis of the EP-WXT and EP-FXT observations, implying a possible supernova shock breakout candidate.GRB Coordinates Network44075, 1 (2026)

    Huang, Q. J.et al.EP260321a: refined analysis of the EP-WXT and EP-FXT observations, implying a possible supernova shock breakout candidate.GRB Coordinates Network44075, 1 (2026)

    2026

  18. [47]

    Lee, M.-H.et al.EP260321a: Kinder observations detect a blue variable star and set limits on a source from the z =0.034 galaxy within the error circle.GRB Coordinates Network 44070, 1 (2026)

    2026

  19. [48]

    N.et al.EP260321a: SVOM/VT optical upper limit.GRB Coordinates Network 44074, 1 (2026)

    Ma, Y . N.et al.EP260321a: SVOM/VT optical upper limit.GRB Coordinates Network 44074, 1 (2026)

    2026

  20. [49]

    Aguilar-Ruiz, E.et al.EP260321a: COLIBR ´I optical upper limit on any supernova shock breakout emission.GRB Coordinates Network44076, 1 (2026)

    2026

  21. [50]

    & Sand, D

    Liang, R., Li, W., Arcavi, I., Keinan, I. & Sand, D. EP260321a: Las Cumbres upper limit. GRB Coordinates Network44079, 1 (2026)

    2026

  22. [51]

    Aryan, A.et al.EP260321a: further Kinder optical observations.GRB Coordinates Network 44081, 1 (2026)

    2026

  23. [52]

    Moran, S.et al.EP260321a: GOTO detection of blue variable source.GRB Coordinates Network44083, 1 (2026)

    2026

  24. [53]

    J., Perley, D

    Ahumada, T., Hall, X. J., Perley, D. A. & the Zwicky Transient Facility. EP260321a: ZTF and Rubin detections of the candidate optical counterpart to EP260321a.GRB Coordinates Network44084, 1 (2026)

    2026

  25. [54]

    GRB Coordinates Network44087, 1 (2026)

    Liu, X.et al.EP260321a: Early TRT rising followed by JinShan decaying and then re-rising. GRB Coordinates Network44087, 1 (2026). 49

    2026

  26. [55]

    K, A.et al.EP260321a: Continued brightening from Kinder follow-up of the emerging supernova candidate.GRB Coordinates Network44089, 1 (2026)

    Sankar. K, A.et al.EP260321a: Continued brightening from Kinder follow-up of the emerging supernova candidate.GRB Coordinates Network44089, 1 (2026)

    2026

  27. [56]

    R.et al.EP260321a: VLT imaging and spectroscopy show the variable source to be at z = 0.0343.GRB Coordinates Network44082, 1 (2026)

    Tanvir, N. R.et al.EP260321a: VLT imaging and spectroscopy show the variable source to be at z = 0.0343.GRB Coordinates Network44082, 1 (2026)

    2026

  28. [57]

    Xu, D.et al.EP260321a / AT2026gzf: VLT/X-shooter detection of supernova-like spectral features at z = 0.0344.GRB Coordinates Network44092, 1 (2026)

    2026

  29. [58]

    Corcoran, G.et al.EP260321a: VLT/FORS2 spectroscopy confirmation of an associated type Ic-BL supernova SN 2026gzf.GRB Coordinates Network44105, 1 (2026)

    2026

  30. [59]

    & Ahumada, T

    Rastinejad, J., Srinivasaragavan, G. & Ahumada, T. EP260321a: Gemini-South confirmation of a supernova.GRB Coordinates Network44107, 1 (2026)

    2026

  31. [60]

    & Gal-Yam, A

    Yaron, O. & Gal-Yam, A. WISeREP—An Interactive Supernova Data Repository. PASP 124, 668 (2012).1204.1891

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  32. [61]

    Planck Collaborationet al.Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters. A&A641, A6 (2020).1807.06209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  33. [62]

    Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD. ApJ737, 103 (2011).1012.4804

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [63]

    ApJ983, 86 (2025).2406.09270

    Chen, T.-W.et al.Discovery and Extensive Follow-up of SN 2024ggi, a Nearby Type IIP Supernova in NGC 3621. ApJ983, 86 (2025).2406.09270

    arXiv 2025

  35. [64]

    C.et al.The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys.arXiv e-printsarXiv:1612.05560 (2016)

    Chambers, K. C.et al.The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys.arXiv e-printsarXiv:1612.05560 (2016). 1612.05560

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  36. [66]

    L.et al.The ATLAS All-Sky Stellar Reference Catalog

    Tonry, J. L.et al.The ATLAS All-Sky Stellar Reference Catalog. ApJ867, 105 (2018). 1809.09157

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  37. [67]

    L.et al.The Pan-STARRS1 Photometric System

    Tonry, J. L.et al.The Pan-STARRS1 Photometric System. ApJ750, 99 (2012).1203. 0297. 50

    2012

  38. [68]

    A.et al.Pan-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Calibration

    Magnier, E. A.et al.Pan-STARRS Photometric and Astrometric Calibration. ApJS251, 6 (2020).1612.05242

    arXiv 2020

  39. [69]

    A.et al.The Pan-STARRS Data-processing System

    Magnier, E. A.et al.The Pan-STARRS Data-processing System. ApJS251, 3 (2020). 1612.05240

    arXiv 2020

  40. [70]

    Z.et al.Pan-STARRS Pixel Processing: Detrending, Warping, Stacking

    Waters, C. Z.et al.Pan-STARRS Pixel Processing: Detrending, Warping, Stacking. ApJS 251, 4 (2020).1612.05245

    arXiv 2020

  41. [71]

    L.et al.ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System

    Tonry, J. L.et al.ATLAS: A High-cadence All-sky Survey System. PASP130, 064505 (2018).1802.00879

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [72]

    W.et al.Design and Operation of the ATLAS Transient Science Server

    Smith, K. W.et al.Design and Operation of the ATLAS Transient Science Server. PASP 132, 085002 (2020).2003.09052

    arXiv 2020

  43. [73]

    Shingles, L.et al.Release of the ATLAS Forced Photometry server for public use.Transient Name Server AstroNote7, 1–7 (2021)

    2021

  44. [74]

    ApJ873, 111 (2019).0805.2366

    Ivezi ´c, ˇZ.et al.LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products. ApJ873, 111 (2019).0805.2366

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  45. [75]

    W.et al.Lasair: The Transient Alert Broker for LSST:UK.Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society3, 26 (2019)

    Smith, K. W.et al.Lasair: The Transient Alert Broker for LSST:UK.Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society3, 26 (2019)

    2019

  46. [76]

    C.et al.The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results

    Bellm, E. C.et al.The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results. PASP131, 018002 (2019).1902.01932

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [77]

    J.et al.The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives

    Graham, M. J.et al.The Zwicky Transient Facility: Science Objectives. PASP131, 078001 (2019).1902.01945

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  48. [78]

    Ap&SS310, 255–268 (2007)

    Dopita, M.et al.The Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS). Ap&SS310, 255–268 (2007). 0705.0287

    arXiv 2007

  49. [79]

    J., V ogt, F

    Childress, M. J., V ogt, F. P. A., Nielsen, J. & Sharp, R. G. PyWiFeS: a rapid data reduction pipeline for the Wide Field Spectrograph (WiFeS). Ap&SS349, 617–636 (2014).1311. 2666. 51

    2014

  50. [80]

    Djupvik, A. A. & Andersen, J. The Nordic Optical Telescope. In Diego, J. M., Goicoechea, L. J., Gonz´alez-Serrano, J. I. & Gorgas, J. (eds.)Highlights of Spanish Astrophysics V, vol. 14 ofAstrophysics and Space Science Proceedings, 211 (2010).0901.4015

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  51. [81]

    Holmbo, S.et al.NUTS2 spectroscopic classification of ASASSN-19jy (AT2019dke) as a young Type II supernova.The Astronomer’s Telegram12661, 1 (2019)

    2019

  52. [82]

    The Astronomer’s Telegram14441, 1 (2021)

    Burns, C.et al.Introducing POISE: Precision Observations of Infant Supernova Explosions. The Astronomer’s Telegram14441, 1 (2021)

    2021

  53. [83]

    Krisciunas, K.et al.The Carnegie Supernova Project. I. Third Photometry Data Release of Low-redshift Type Ia Supernovae and Other White Dwarf Explosions. AJ154, 211 (2017). 1709.05146

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  54. [84]

    C.et al.Mass producing an efficient NIR spectrograph

    Wilson, J. C.et al.Mass producing an efficient NIR spectrograph. In Moorwood, A. F. M. & Iye, M. (eds.)Ground-based Instrumentation for Astronomy, vol. 5492 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, 1295–1305 (2004)

    2004

  55. [85]

    T.et al.SpeX: A Medium-Resolution 0.8-5.5 Micron Spectrograph and Imager for the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility

    Rayner, J. T.et al.SpeX: A Medium-Resolution 0.8-5.5 Micron Spectrograph and Imager for the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. PASP115, 362–382 (2003)

    2003

  56. [86]

    Medler, K.et al.The Hawaii Infrared Supernova Study (HISS): Spectroscopic Data Release

  57. [87]

    ApJS281, 28 (2025).2505.18507

    arXiv 2025

  58. [88]

    B.et al.Seeing the Outer Edge of the Infant Type Ia Supernova 2024epr in the Optical and Near Infrared.The Open Journal of Astrophysics8, 120 (2025).2502

    Hoogendam, W. B.et al.Seeing the Outer Edge of the Infant Type Ia Supernova 2024epr in the Optical and Near Infrared.The Open Journal of Astrophysics8, 120 (2025).2502. 17556

    2025

  59. [89]

    B.et al.Early and Extensive Ultraviolet through Near Infrared Observations of the Intermediate-luminosity Type Iax Supernovae 2024pxl

    Hoogendam, W. B.et al.Early and Extensive Ultraviolet through Near Infrared Observations of the Intermediate-luminosity Type Iax Supernovae 2024pxl. ApJ988, 209 (2025).2505. 04610

    2025

  60. [90]

    Medler, K.et al.JWST Observations of SN 2023ixf. II. The Panchromatic Evolution between 250 and 720 Days after the Explosion. ApJ993, 191 (2025).2507.19727

    arXiv 2025

  61. [91]

    PASJ70, S1 (2018)

    Miyazaki, S.et al.Hyper Suprime-Cam: System design and verification of image quality. PASJ70, S1 (2018). 52

    2018

  62. [92]

    2018, PASJ, 70, S4, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx066

    Aihara, H.et al.The Hyper Suprime-Cam SSP Survey: Overview and survey design.Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan70(2017). URLhttps:// doi.org/10.1093/pasj/psx066. S4,https://academic.oup.com/pasj/ article-pdf/70/SP1/S4/23692189/psx066.pdf

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1093/pasj/psx066 2017

  63. [93]

    PASJ74, 247–272 (2022).2108.13045

    Aihara, H.et al.Third data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program. PASJ74, 247–272 (2022).2108.13045

    arXiv 2022

  64. [94]

    AJ150, 150 (2015).1504.02900

    Flaugher, B.et al.The Dark Energy Camera. AJ150, 150 (2015).1504.02900

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [95]

    AJ157, 168 (2019).1804

    Dey, A.et al.Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys. AJ157, 168 (2019).1804. 08657

    2019

  66. [96]

    Sonbas, E.et al.Stellar-wind envelope around the massive supernova progenitor XRF/GRB 060218/SN 2006aj.Astrophysical Bulletin63, 228–243 (2008).0805.2657

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  67. [97]

    ApJ645, L21–L24 (2006).astro-ph/0603377

    Modjaz, M.et al.Early-Time Photometry and Spectroscopy of the Fast Evolving SN 2006aj Associated with GRB 060218. ApJ645, L21–L24 (2006).astro-ph/0603377

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  68. [98]

    Nature 442, 1011–1013 (2006).astro-ph/0603530

    Pian, E.et al.An optical supernova associated with the X-ray flash XRF 060218. Nature 442, 1011–1013 (2006).astro-ph/0603530

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  69. [99]

    Kerzendorf, W. E. & Sim, S. A. A spectral synthesis code for rapid modelling of supernovae. MNRAS440, 387–404 (2014).1401.5469

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  70. [100]

    Nature565, 324–327 (2019).1901.05500

    Izzo, L.et al.Signatures of a jet cocoon in early spectra of a supernova associated with a γ-ray burst. Nature565, 324–327 (2019).1901.05500

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  71. [101]

    A.et al.Ultraviolet Spectroscopy and TARDIS Models of the Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova 2014ad

    Kwok, L. A.et al.Ultraviolet Spectroscopy and TARDIS Models of the Broad-lined Type Ic Supernova 2014ad. ApJ937, 40 (2022).2204.03716

    arXiv 2022

  72. [102]

    Low-mass objects

    Hachinger, S.et al.How much H and He is ’hidden’ in SNe Ib/c? - I. Low-mass objects. MNRAS422, 70–88 (2012).1201.1506

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  73. [103]

    A., Hachinger, S

    Boyle, A., Sim, S. A., Hachinger, S. & Kerzendorf, W. Helium in double-detonation models of type Ia supernovae. A&A599, A46 (2017).1611.05938

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  74. [104]

    & Modjaz, M

    Williamson, M., Kerzendorf, W. & Modjaz, M. Modeling Type Ic Supernovae with TARDIS: Hidden Helium in SN 1994I? ApJ908, 150 (2021).2010.10528. 53

    arXiv 2021

  75. [105]

    ApJ1002, L11 (2026)

    Lu, J.et al.Traces of Helium Detected in Type Ic Supernova 2014L. ApJ1002, L11 (2026)

    2026

  76. [106]

    SCAMP: Automatic astrometric and photometric calibration.ASCL1010, 063 (2006)

    Bertin, E. SCAMP: Automatic astrometric and photometric calibration.ASCL1010, 063 (2006)

    2006

  77. [107]

    Bertin, E.et al.The TERAPIX pipeline.ASPC281, 228 (2002)

    2002

  78. [108]

    Brennan, S. J. & Fraser, M. The AUTOmated Photometry Of Transients pipeline (AutoPhOT). A&A667, A62 (2022).2201.02635

    arXiv 2022

  79. [109]

    W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M. & Roweis, S. Astrometry.net: Blind astrometric calibration of arbitrary astronomical images.AJ139, 1782–1800 (2010). 0910.2233

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  80. [110]

    Summary of the content and survey properties

    Gaia Collaborationet al.Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. A&A674, A1 (2023).2208.00211

    arXiv 2023

Showing first 80 references.