pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10014 · v1 · pith:RQOMUO2Snew · submitted 2026-06-08 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · astro-ph.SR

Thermal X-rays breaking out from pre-explosion ejecta of a dying massive star

Weimin Yuan , Qiu-Ju Huang , Jin-Ping Zhu , Yun-Wei Yu , Dong Xu , Chen Zhang , Zhuo Li , Yuan Liu
show 125 more authors
Tao An Giulia Gianfagna Weikang Zheng Guowang Du Xing Liu Ji-An Jiang Johan P.U. Fynbo Alexei S. Pozanenko Junjie Jin Yi Yang Jinsong Deng Hui Sun Guang-Lei Wu Yu-Hao Zhang Bao Wang Yu Wang Xiangyu Wang Bin-Bin Zhang Yong Chen Yonghe Zhang Bo Wang Xiaofeng Wang Xuefeng Wu Zigao Dai Jie An G.C. Anupama Arvind Balasubramanian Congying Bao Aru Beri Varun Bhalerao Thomas G. Brink Gabriele Bruni Minxuan Cai Zhiming Cai Krittapas Chanchaiworawit Yehai Chen Huaqing Cheng Bertrand Cordier Chenzhou Cui Weiwei Cui Cuiyuan Dai D. Eappachen M. V. Eselevich Xiao Fan Zhou Fan Yuan Fang Hua Feng Alexei V. Filippenko Shaoyu Fu He Gao Jinjun Geng Vitaly Goranskij Ju Guan Dawei Han Jinxin Hao Linbo He Min He Jingwei Hu Maohai Huang Shumei Jia Ziqing Jia Shuaiqing Jiang Chichuan Jin Ge Jin Peter Jonker E. V. Klunko Albert K. H. Kong Chengkui Li Dongyue Li Rui-Zhi Li Wenxiong Li Run-Duo Liang Zhixing Ling Congzhan Liu Huaqiu Liu Liangduan Liu Xiangkun Liu Xiaowei Liu Yuanqi Liu Zhengwei Liu Fangjun Lu Jirong Mao Xuan Mao A. S. Moskvitin Haiyang Mu Kirpal Nandra Jan-Uwe Ness Kangrui Ni Kanthanakorn Noysena Paul O'Brien Haiwu Pan Yu Pan N.S. Pankov Luigi Piro J. Quirola-Vasquez Arne Rau Nanda Rea D.K. Sahu Aditya Pawan Saikia Jeremy Sanders Liming Song Olga Spiridonova Ning-Chen Sun Shengli Sun Xiaojin Sun Yuyin Tan Aishwarya Linesh Thakur Samaporn Tinyanont Valery Vlasyuk A.V. Volnova Ailing Wang Hong Wu Qianrui Wu Haitao Xu Zelin Xu Changbin Xue Yi-Han Iris Yin I. A. Zaznobin Jia-Sen Zhang Shuang-Nan Zhang Songbo Zhang Yu Zhang Zipei Zhu Zecheng Zou Bing Zhang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 15:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR
keywords shock breakoutX-ray transientsupernovapre-explosion mass ejectionWolf-Rayet starType Ic supernovathermal X-ray emission
0
0 comments X

The pith

Soft thermal X-rays show a shock breaking out from a shell ejected by a massive star about a month before its supernova.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports the detection of the fast soft X-ray transient EP260321a, which is followed days later by a broad-lined Type Ic supernova from a stripped Wolf-Rayet progenitor. The X-ray spectrum fits a blackbody, and the event's long duration plus high total energy together require that the shock broke out from a surrounding shell at a radius of roughly 300 solar radii instead of the stellar surface. This supplies direct evidence that the star ejected material abruptly within about a month before core collapse. Real-time detection of such shock breakouts supplies precise timing of stellar death that can trigger searches for neutrinos and gravitational waves alongside multi-wavelength follow-up.

Core claim

The central claim is that EP260321a constitutes a bona fide shock-breakout event whose thermal spectrum, duration, and fluence indicate breakout from pre-explosion ejecta at approximately 300 solar radii. The subsequent appearance of an SN Ic-BL identifies the progenitor as a Wolf-Rayet star whose hydrogen and helium envelopes had already been stripped. The inferred shell radius supplies direct evidence of abrupt mass ejection within roughly one month prior to core collapse.

What carries the argument

Shock-breakout scaling relations that convert the observed duration and fluence of the thermal X-ray emission into an inferred breakout radius outside the progenitor surface.

If this is right

  • Core collapse can be timed to within hours or days from the X-ray detection.
  • Efficient targeted searches for associated neutrinos and gravitational-wave signals become possible.
  • Timely multi-wavelength observations can probe the immediate pre-explosion environment of the star.
  • Intense pre-explosion mass ejection is indicated as a feature of at least some massive-star deaths.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Other fast X-ray transients lacking clear supernova counterparts may also arise from late-stage mass ejection rather than surface breakouts.
  • The 300-solar-radii shell radius implies specific ejection velocities and timescales that hydrodynamic models could test with future events.
  • A statistical sample of such detections could quantify how common abrupt pre-collapse mass loss is among stripped progenitors.

Load-bearing premise

The X-ray spectrum is assumed to be pure unmodified thermal blackbody emission whose duration and energy map directly onto the breakout radius via standard scaling relations.

What would settle it

An X-ray spectrum containing a clear non-thermal power-law component or an independent radius measurement from radio or optical observations that differs significantly from 300 solar radii would falsify the pre-explosion-shell interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10014 by Aditya Pawan Saikia, Ailing Wang, Aishwarya Linesh Thakur, Albert K. H. Kong, Alexei S. Pozanenko, Alexei V. Filippenko, Arne Rau, Aru Beri, Arvind Balasubramanian, A. S. Moskvitin, A.V. Volnova, Bao Wang, Bertrand Cordier, Bin-Bin Zhang, Bing Zhang, Bo Wang, Changbin Xue, Chengkui Li, Chen Zhang, Chenzhou Cui, Chichuan Jin, Congying Bao, CongZhan Liu, Cuiyuan Dai, DaWei Han, D. Eappachen, D.K. Sahu, Dong Xu, Dongyue Li, E. V. Klunko, Fangjun Lu, Gabriele Bruni, G.C. Anupama, Ge Jin, Giulia Gianfagna, Guang-Lei Wu, Guowang Du, Haitao Xu, Haiwu Pan, Haiyang Mu, He Gao, Hong Wu, Hua Feng, Huaqing Cheng, Huaqiu Liu, Hui Sun, I. A. Zaznobin, Jan-Uwe Ness, Jeremy Sanders, Ji-an Jiang, Jia-Sen Zhang, Jie An, Jingwei Hu, Jinjun Geng, Jin-Ping Zhu, Jinsong Deng, Jinxin Hao, Jirong Mao, Johan P.U. Fynbo, J. Quirola-Vasquez, Ju Guan, Junjie Jin, Kangrui Ni, Kanthanakorn Noysena, Kirpal Nandra, Krittapas Chanchaiworawit, Liangduan Liu, Liming Song, Linbo He, Luigi Piro, Maohai Huang, Min He, Minxuan Cai, M. V. Eselevich, Nanda Rea, Ning-Chen Sun, N.S. Pankov, Olga Spiridonova, Paul O'Brien, Peter Jonker, Qianrui Wu, Qiu-Ju Huang, Rui-Zhi Li, Run-Duo Liang, Samaporn Tinyanont, Shaoyu Fu, Shengli Sun, Shuaiqing Jiang, Shuang-Nan Zhang, Shumei Jia, Songbo Zhang, Tao An, Thomas G. Brink, Valery Vlasyuk, Varun Bhalerao, Vitaly Goranskij, Weikang Zheng, Weimin Yuan, Weiwei Cui, Wenxiong Li, Xiangkun Liu, Xiangyu Wang, Xiao Fan, Xiaofeng Wang, Xiaojin Sun, Xiaowei Liu, Xing Liu, Xuan Mao, Xuefeng Wu, Yehai Chen, Yi-Han Iris Yin, Yi Yang, Yong Chen, Yonghe Zhang, Yuan Fang, Yuan Liu, Yuanqi Liu, Yu-Hao Zhang, Yun-Wei Yu, Yu Pan, Yu Wang, Yuyin Tan, Yu Zhang, Zecheng Zou, Zelin Xu, Zhengwei Liu, Zhiming Cai, Zhixing Ling, Zhou Fan, Zhuo Li, Zigao Dai, Zipei Zhu, Ziqing Jia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: X-ray/optical images and X-ray evolution of EP260321a. Upper: WXT and FXT￾A image in 0.4–2.0 keV. The white circle shows the positional error circle of WXT with a ra￾dius of 2.7 ′ (90% confidence level). The optical image is the composite Mephisto-gri band im￾ages taken at ∼T0 + 2.3 hr. Lower: The evolution of unabsorbed X-ray flux in 0.4–2.0 keV (upper) and temperature (lower) under the absorbed blackbody… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: X-ray spectra of EP260321a. The WXT spectrum includes data from T0 to T0 + 2200 s; the FXT spectra include data from T0 + 1065 s to T0 + 2359 s. The count rate of the FXT-B spectrum is significantly lower than that of FXT-A, since the counts in the core of the point-spread function of FXT-B were excluded in the spectrum to mitigate pile-up effect (Methods). The data points are shown with 1σ uncertainty and… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: X-ray light curves and luminosity function of SN SBOs. Left: X-ray luminosity light curves of SN SBO events, including EP260321a, XRF 0602184, 5, and XRO 0801096, 7. The data points are shown with 1σ uncertainty. The open triangles represent the upper limits derived from the FXT monitoring observations of EP260321a. The data of XRF 060218 are obtained from the Swift X-ray telescope light-curve repository49… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multiband optical and near-infrared evolution of SN 2026gzf. Apparent magnitudes are plotted as a function of time, with vertical offsets applied to individual filters for clarity. Open downward triangles mark upper limits. The solid lines give a theoretical fit of the light curves by invoking power due to the radioactive decay of 56Ni, with the shaded bands representing the 1σ model uncertainty. 11 [PITH… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The evolution of the time-resolved WXT and FXT spectra. The data points are shown with 1σ uncertainty and the lines represent the best-fit absorbed blackbody model. The data points of WXT and FXT spectra are rebinned to 2σ and 3σ significance, respectively, for clarity. The numbers in the square brackets of the legend represent the time intervals (in seconds) relative to T0 = 2026-03-21T12:16:08 UTC. The b… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spectral evolution and bolometric light curve of SN 2026gzf. The spectrum￾integrated absolute bolometric magnitude of SN 2026gzf is represented by solid circles, plotted alongside the quasibolometric counterparts of representative normal-luminosity, luminous, and su￾perluminous stripped-envelope supernovae. Relative to the other two supernovae with reported X-ray SBO detections, SN 2026gzf rises rapidl… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radio upper limits (downward triangles) compared with model predictions. Left: Radio light curves at 1.25, 6, 17, and 23 GHz, shown as a function of time since T0. Solid curves illustrate the expected emission from supernova ejecta–CSM interaction, while dashed curves in￾dicate the radio afterglow of on-axis jets. The shaded regions arises from the typical uncertainties of the model parameters. Right: Theo… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Massive stars die as energetic supernova explosions, but the physical processes during and before such explosions are poorly studied observationally. The first electromagnetic signals from core-collapse events are predicted to be a flash of soft X-ray and ultraviolet (UV) light, produced as a result of a shock wave breaking out of the star and its surrounding medium. Such shock breakout (SBO) events often carry essential information about the explosion energetics, the progenitor star, and its immediate environment. However, they are difficult to catch because of their very short durations and a historical lack of sensitive wide-field monitors. Only two SBO events have been detected so far in X-rays, but their emission spectra are modified from the simple thermal form by complicated physical factors, however. Here we report the discovery of a fast X-ray transient, EP260321a, followed by a broad-lined Type Ic supernova (SN Ic-BL) emerging days later, suggesting its progenitor as a Wolf-Rayet star with its hydrogen and helium envelopes stripped. Its X-ray emission is soft and best modeled by blackbody radiation, making it a bona fide SBO. The observed long duration and large total energy output of the X-ray event jointly indicate a shock breaking out from a surrounding shell at a radius of about 300 solar radii, rather than from the progenitor star's surface. This provides direct evidence of abrupt mass ejection within a month prior to core collapse, suggesting intense pre-explosion activity for a massive star. The real-time detection of SBOs yields precise timing of stellar core-collapse, allowing for efficient searches for associated neutrinos and potential gravitational-wave signals. These, together with timely multi-wavelength observations, may uncover how massive stars end their lives.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports the discovery of the fast X-ray transient EP260321a, which is followed days later by a broad-lined Type Ic supernova. The X-ray emission is interpreted as a genuine shock breakout (SBO) event from a pre-explosion shell at ~300 R_⊙ surrounding a stripped Wolf-Rayet progenitor. The spectrum is stated to be soft and best fit by a blackbody, with the observed duration and total energy used via standard SBO scaling relations to infer the large breakout radius rather than the stellar surface, thereby providing evidence for abrupt mass ejection within a month before core collapse.

Significance. If the central interpretation is robust, the result would be significant for supernova progenitor studies: it supplies direct evidence of intense pre-explosion mass loss in a massive star and demonstrates the utility of real-time SBO detections for timing core collapse and enabling multi-messenger follow-up. The association with an SN Ic-BL also strengthens links between stripped progenitors and certain transients.

major comments (3)
  1. [Spectral analysis] Spectral analysis section: the claim that the X-ray spectrum 'is soft and best modeled by blackbody radiation' is presented without any reported fit statistics (χ², degrees of freedom, null-hypothesis probability), parameter uncertainties, or explicit comparison to alternative models (e.g., absorbed power law or Comptonized spectra). This is load-bearing for the 'bona fide SBO' classification.
  2. [Radius inference] Radius inference section: the ~300 R_⊙ shell radius is derived from observed duration and fluence using standard analytic SBO scaling relations (light-crossing or diffusion time) under the assumption of unmodified thermal blackbody emission. No quantitative propagation of uncertainties from possible non-thermal tails, line-of-sight absorption, or deviations from the assumed scaling is shown, which directly affects whether the data require an extended shell rather than a stellar-surface breakout.
  3. [Data reduction] Data reduction and light-curve section: no details are provided on background subtraction, pile-up corrections, or the precise fluence integration used to obtain the total energy output that enters the radius calculation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the instrument (EP) and the precise time delay between the X-ray transient and the optical SN discovery.
  2. [Introduction] Notation for the breakout radius (R) should be defined explicitly when first introduced and kept consistent with any equations in the scaling-relation derivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report. The comments highlight areas where additional quantitative details will strengthen the presentation. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested information while preserving the core interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Spectral analysis] Spectral analysis section: the claim that the X-ray spectrum 'is soft and best modeled by blackbody radiation' is presented without any reported fit statistics (χ², degrees of freedom, null-hypothesis probability), parameter uncertainties, or explicit comparison to alternative models (e.g., absorbed power law or Comptonized spectra). This is load-bearing for the 'bona fide SBO' classification.

    Authors: We agree that explicit fit statistics are required to support the blackbody classification. In the revised manuscript we will add a table or expanded text reporting χ², degrees of freedom, null-hypothesis probability, and 1σ parameter uncertainties for the blackbody model. We will also present direct statistical comparisons (e.g., Δχ² or F-test results) against an absorbed power-law and a Comptonized model, demonstrating that the blackbody remains the preferred description. These additions will be placed in the spectral analysis section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Radius inference] Radius inference section: the ~300 R_⊙ shell radius is derived from observed duration and fluence using standard analytic SBO scaling relations (light-crossing or diffusion time) under the assumption of unmodified thermal blackbody emission. No quantitative propagation of uncertainties from possible non-thermal tails, line-of-sight absorption, or deviations from the assumed scaling is shown, which directly affects whether the data require an extended shell rather than a stellar-surface breakout.

    Authors: We will add a new paragraph in the radius-inference section that performs explicit uncertainty propagation. Using both analytic error propagation and a Monte-Carlo resampling of the observed duration and fluence (including conservative allowances for a possible non-thermal tail at the 10–20 % level and variable absorption columns), we will show the resulting radius distribution. Even under the most conservative assumptions the lower bound remains well above the expected Wolf-Rayet stellar radius (~few R_⊙), thereby preserving the requirement for an extended pre-explosion shell. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Data reduction] Data reduction and light-curve section: no details are provided on background subtraction, pile-up corrections, or the precise fluence integration used to obtain the total energy output that enters the radius calculation.

    Authors: We will expand the data-reduction subsection to describe the background-subtraction method (including the source-free regions used), any pile-up assessment and correction applied to the EP data, and the exact energy band, time interval, and integration procedure used to derive the fluence. These details will enable full reproducibility of the total energy that enters the radius calculation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; radius inferred via external standard SBO scalings on observed duration/fluence

full rationale

The derivation infers breakout radius (~300 R_sun) directly from measured X-ray duration and total energy using standard analytic shock-breakout relations (light-crossing or diffusion time) applied to an assumed pure blackbody spectrum. This step is not a fit to the same dataset, not self-definitional, and does not rely on load-bearing self-citations or prior author uniqueness theorems. The chain remains independent of the target conclusion about pre-explosion ejection.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the X-ray data are purely thermal and that standard breakout scaling relations apply without modification; no free parameters are explicitly named in the abstract, but the 300-solar-radius value is the output of those relations.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The observed X-ray spectrum is produced by unmodified thermal blackbody emission from a shock-breakout surface.
    Invoked when stating the emission is best modeled by blackbody radiation and is a bona fide SBO.
  • domain assumption Standard analytic shock-breakout scaling relations map observed duration and total energy directly to breakout radius without additional physical corrections.
    Used to conclude the radius is ~300 solar radii and that breakout occurs from a surrounding shell rather than the stellar surface.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6464 in / 1498 out tokens · 20403 ms · 2026-06-27T15:24:06.379184+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Pinning Down the Geometry of the Type Ic Broad-Line Supernova 2026gzf

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Spectropolarimetry of SN 2026gzf indicates mostly spherical ejecta with axisymmetric Ca distribution viewed at ~40° from symmetry axis.

  2. Discovery of a Supernova Following the Einstein Probe Transient EP250302a at z = 1.131

    astro-ph.HE 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    The paper identifies supernova emission matching a scaled SN 1998bw template in the late-time light curve of EP250302a at z=1.131, with early data constraining the jet Lorentz factor above 25.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 43 linked inside Pith · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Colgate, S. A. Early Gamma Rays from Supernovae.Astrophys. J.187, 333–336 (1974)

    1974

  2. [2]

    & Katz, B

    Waxman, E. & Katz, B. Shock Breakout Theory. In Alsabti, A. W. & Murdin, P. (eds.) Handbook of Supernovae,967 (2017)

    2017

  3. [3]

    Chevalier, R. A. & Irwin, C. M. Shock Breakout in Dense Mass Loss: Luminous Supernovae. Astrophys. J. Let.729, L6 (2011).1101.1111

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  4. [4]

    Campana, S.et al.The association of GRB 060218 with a supernova and the evolution of the shock wave.Nature442, 1008–1010 (2006).astro-ph/0603279

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  5. [5]

    A.et al.A neutron-star-driven X-ray flash associated with supernova SN 2006aj

    Mazzali, P. A.et al.A neutron-star-driven X-ray flash associated with supernova SN 2006aj. Nature442, 1018–1020 (2006).astro-ph/0603567

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  6. [6]

    M.et al.An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova

    Soderberg, A. M.et al.An extremely luminous X-ray outburst at the birth of a supernova. Nature453, 469–474 (2008).0802.1712

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  7. [7]

    A.et al.The Metamorphosis of Supernova SN 2008D/XRF 080109: A Link Between Supernovae and GRBs/Hypernovae.Science321, 1185 (2008).0807.1695

    Mazzali, P. A.et al.The Metamorphosis of Supernova SN 2008D/XRF 080109: A Link Between Supernovae and GRBs/Hypernovae.Science321, 1185 (2008).0807.1695

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    & Ling, Z

    Yuan, W., Zhang, C., Chen, Y . & Ling, Z. The Einstein Probe Mission. In Bambi, C. & Sangangelo, A. (eds.)Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics,86 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    Yuan, W.et al.Science objectives of the Einstein Probe mission.Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy68, 239501 (2025).2501.07362

    arXiv 2025

  10. [11]

    Lee, M.-H.et al.EP260321a: Kinder observations detect a blue variable star and set limits on a source from the z =0.034 galaxy within the error circle.GRB Coordinates Network 44070, 1 (2026)

    2026

  11. [12]

    J.et al.EP260321a: Einstein Probe detection of an X-ray transient.GRB Coordinates Network44068, 1 (2026)

    Huang, Q. J.et al.EP260321a: Einstein Probe detection of an X-ray transient.GRB Coordinates Network44068, 1 (2026)

    2026

  12. [13]

    J.et al.EP260321a: refined analysis of the EP-WXT and EP-FXT observations, implying a possible supernova shock breakout candidate.GRB Coordinates Network44075, 1 (2026)

    Huang, Q. J.et al.EP260321a: refined analysis of the EP-WXT and EP-FXT observations, implying a possible supernova shock breakout candidate.GRB Coordinates Network44075, 1 (2026)

    2026

  13. [14]

    & Troja, E

    O’Connor, B. & Troja, E. EP260321a: Chandra X-ray Non-detection.GRB Coordinates Network44250, 1 (2026). 27

    2026

  14. [15]

    Willingale, R., Starling, R. L. C., Beardmore, A. P., Tanvir, N. R. & O’Brien, P. T. Calibration of X-ray absorption in our Galaxy.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.431, 394–404 (2013)

    2013

  15. [16]

    Sun, H.et al.A fast X-ray transient from a weak relativistic jet associated with a type Ic-BL supernova.Nature Astronomy9, 1073–1085 (2025).2410.02315

    arXiv 2025

  16. [17]

    Li, W.-X.et al.An extremely soft and weak fast X-ray transient associated with a luminous supernova.arXiv e-printsarXiv:2504.17034 (2025).2504.17034

    arXiv 2025

  17. [18]

    J.969, 126 (2024).2405.08327

    Yang, Y .-P.et al.Multiband Simultaneous Photometry of Type II SN 2023ixf with Mephisto and the Twin 50 cm Telescopes.Astrophys. J.969, 126 (2024).2405.08327

    arXiv 2024

  18. [19]

    Chen, X.et al.Early-phase Simultaneous Multiband Observations of the Type II Supernova SN 2024ggi with Mephisto.Astrophys. J. Let.971, L2 (2024).2405.07964

    arXiv 2024

  19. [20]

    T.-W.et al.Decadal pre-explosion activity and circumstellar interaction in a supernova.in preparation(2026)

    Chen, J. T.-W.et al.Decadal pre-explosion activity and circumstellar interaction in a supernova.in preparation(2026)

    2026

  20. [21]

    Martin-Carrillo, A.et al.Lack of jet signatures in the supernova associated with ep260321a located in an extreme environment.in preparation(2026)

    2026

  21. [22]

    Pian, E.et al.An optical supernova associated with the X-ray flash XRF 060218.Nature 442, 1011–1013 (2006).astro-ph/0603530

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  22. [23]

    W., Panagia, N., Montes, M

    Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., Montes, M. J. & Sramek, R. A. Radio Emission from Supernovae and Gamma-Ray Bursters.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.40, 387–438 (2002)

    2002

  23. [24]

    & Frail, D

    Chandra, P. & Frail, D. A. A Radio-selected Sample of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows. Astrophys. J.746, 156 (2012).1110.4124

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [25]

    A Unified Picture for Low-luminosity and Long Gamma-Ray Bursts Based on the Extended Progenitor of llGRB 060218/SN 2006aj.Astrophys

    Nakar, E. A Unified Picture for Low-luminosity and Long Gamma-Ray Bursts Based on the Extended Progenitor of llGRB 060218/SN 2006aj.Astrophys. J.807, 172 (2015). 1503.00441

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [27]

    Zheng, J.-H. & Lu, W. Fast X-Ray Transients Produced by Off-axis Jet Cocoons from Long Gamma-Ray Bursts.Astrophys. J. Let.1003, L19 (2026).2603.09674. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  26. [28]

    & Waxman, E

    Katz, B., Budnik, R. & Waxman, E. Fast Radiation Mediated Shocks and Supernova Shock Breakouts.Astrophys. J.716, 781–791 (2010).0902.4708

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  27. [29]

    Crowther, P. A. Physical Properties of Wolf-Rayet Stars.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.45, 177–219 (2007).astro-ph/0610356

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  28. [30]

    & Sari, R

    Nakar, E. & Sari, R. Early Supernovae Light Curves Following the Shock Breakout.Astro- phys. J.725, 904–921 (2010).1004.2496

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  29. [31]

    & Shiode, J

    Quataert, E. & Shiode, J. Wave-driven mass loss in the last year of stellar evolution: setting the stage for the most luminous core-collapse supernovae.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.423, L92–L96 (2012).1202.5036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [32]

    Fuller, J. & Ro, S. Pre-supernova outbursts via wave heating in massive stars - II. Hydrogen- poor stars.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.476, 1853–1868 (2018).1710.04251

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [33]

    & Fuller, J

    Leung, S.-C., Wu, S. & Fuller, J. Wave-driven Mass Loss of Stripped Envelope Massive Stars: Progenitor-dependence, Mass Ejection, and Supernovae.Astrophys. J.923, 41 (2021). 2110.01565

    arXiv 2021

  32. [34]

    & Fuller, J

    Wu, S. & Fuller, J. A Diversity of Wave-driven Presupernova Outbursts.Astrophys. J.906, 3 (2021).2011.05453

    arXiv 2021

  33. [35]

    Wu, S. C. & Fuller, J. Wave-driven Outbursts and Variability of Low-mass Supernova Pro- genitors.Astrophys. J.930, 119 (2022).2205.03319

    arXiv 2022

  34. [36]

    J.992, 20 (2025).2505.13825

    Liu, L.-D.et al.TransFit: An Efficient Framework for Transient Light-curve Fitting with Time-dependent Radiative Diffusion.Astrophys. J.992, 20 (2025).2505.13825

    arXiv 2025

  35. [37]

    J., Janka, H.-T

    Hammer, N. J., Janka, H.-T. & M ¨uller, E. Three-dimensional Simulations of Mixing Insta- bilities in Supernova Explosions.Astrophys. J.714, 1371–1385 (2010).0908.3474

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  36. [38]

    & Janka, H.-T

    Wongwathanarat, A., M ¨uller, E. & Janka, H.-T. Three-dimensional simulations of core- collapse supernovae: from shock revival to shock breakout.Astron. Astrophys.577, A48 (2015).1409.5431

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  37. [39]

    R., Langer, N., Moriya, T

    Aguilera-Dena, D. R., Langer, N., Moriya, T. J. & Schootemeijer, A. Related Progenitor Models for Long-duration Gamma-Ray Bursts and Type Ic Superluminous Supernovae.As- trophys. J.858, 115 (2018).1804.07317. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  38. [40]

    D.et al.Bolometric light curves and explosion parameters of 38 stripped-envelope core-collapse supernovae.Mon

    Lyman, J. D.et al.Bolometric light curves and explosion parameters of 38 stripped-envelope core-collapse supernovae.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.457, 328–350 (2016).1406.3667

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  39. [41]

    Analysis of stripped-envelope supernova light curves.Astron

    Taddia, F.et al.The Carnegie Supernova Project I. Analysis of stripped-envelope supernova light curves.Astron. Astrophys.609, A136 (2018).1707.07614

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [42]

    & Piran, T

    Nakar, E. & Piran, T. The Observable Signatures of GRB Cocoons.Astrophys. J.834, 28 (2017).1610.05362

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  41. [43]

    Hamidani, H.et al.EP240414a: A Gamma-Ray Burst Jet Weakened by an Extended Circumstellar Material.Astrophys. J. Let.986, L4 (2025).2503.16243

    arXiv 2025

  42. [44]

    & Zhang, B

    Zheng, J.-H., Zhu, J.-P., Lu, W. & Zhang, B. EP240414a: Off-axis View of a Jet-cocoon System from an Expanded Progenitor Star.Astrophys. J.985, 21 (2025).2503.24266

    arXiv 2025

  43. [45]

    M.et al.Shock breakout and early light curves of type II-P supernovae observed with Kepler.Astrophys

    Garnavich, P. M.et al.Shock breakout and early light curves of type II-P supernovae observed with Kepler.Astrophys. J.820, 23 (2016).1603.05657

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  44. [46]

    C.et al.A surge of light at the birth of a supernova.Nature554, 497–499 (2018).1802.09360

    Bersten, M. C.et al.A surge of light at the birth of a supernova.Nature554, 497–499 (2018).1802.09360

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [47]

    Li, G.et al.A shock flash breaking out of a dusty red supergiant.Nature627, 754–758 (2024).2311.14409

    arXiv 2024

  46. [48]

    & Takahashi, K

    Kotake, K., Sato, K. & Takahashi, K. Explosion mechanism, neutrino burst and gravitational wave in core-collapse supernovae.Reports on Progress in Physics69, 971–1143 (2006). astro-ph/0509456

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  47. [49]

    A.et al.An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves ofγ-ray bursts.Astron

    Evans, P. A.et al.An online repository of Swift/XRT light curves ofγ-ray bursts.Astron. Astrophys.469, 379–385 (2007).0704.0128

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  48. [50]

    A.et al.Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs.Mon

    Evans, P. A.et al.Methods and results of an automatic analysis of a complete sample of Swift-XRT observations of GRBs.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.397, 1177–1201 (2009). 0812.3662

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  49. [51]

    Astrophys

    Modjaz, M.et al.From Shock Breakout to Peak and Beyond: Extensive Panchromatic Ob- servations of the Type Ib Supernova 2008D Associated with Swift X-ray Transient 080109. Astrophys. J.702, 226–248 (2009).0805.2201

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  50. [52]

    Cheng, H.et al.Ground calibration result of the wide-field X-ray telescope (WXT) onboard the Einstein probe.Experimental Astronomy60, 15 (2025).2505.18939. 30

    arXiv 2025

  51. [53]

    Experimental Astronomy57, 10 (2024).2312.06964

    Cheng, H.et al.Ground calibration result of the Lobster Eye Imager for Astronomy. Experimental Astronomy57, 10 (2024).2312.06964

    arXiv 2024

  52. [54]

    Chen, Y .et al.Design and development of the follow-up X-ray telescope onboard Einstein Probe in China: a review.Radiation Detection Technology and Methods9, 198–207 (2025)

    2025

  53. [55]

    Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio

    Cash, W. Parameter estimation in astronomy through application of the likelihood ratio. Astrophys. J.228, 939–947 (1979)

    1979

  54. [56]

    Estimating the Dimension of a Model.Annals of Statistics6, 461–464 (1978)

    Schwarz, G. Estimating the Dimension of a Model.Annals of Statistics6, 461–464 (1978)

    1978

  55. [57]

    Yang, Y .-P.et al.Multiband Simultaneous Photometry of Type II SN 2023ixf with Mephisto and the Twin 50 cm Telescopes.ApJL969, 126 (2024)

    2024

  56. [58]

    Chen, X.et al.Early-phase Simultaneous Multiband Observations of the Type II Supernova SN 2024ggi with Mephisto.ApJL971, L2 (2024)

    2024

  57. [59]

    J.675, 626–643 (2008)

    Wang, X.et al.Optical and Near-Infrared Observations of the Highly Reddened, Rapidly Expanding Type Ia Supernova SN 2006X in M100.Astrophys. J.675, 626–643 (2008). 0708.0140

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  58. [60]

    Schlafly, E. F. & Finkbeiner, D. P. Measuring Reddening with Sloan Digital Sky Survey Stellar Spectra and Recalibrating SFD.Astrophys. J.737, 103 (2011)

    2011

  59. [61]

    W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M

    Lang, D., Hogg, D. W., Mierle, K., Blanton, M. & Roweis, S. Astrometry.net: Blind Astro- metric Calibration of Arbitrary Astronomical Images.Astron. J.139, 1782–1800 (2010)

    2010

  60. [62]

    Automatic Astrometric and Photometric Calibration with SCAMP

    Bertin, E. Automatic Astrometric and Photometric Calibration with SCAMP. In Gabriel, C., Arviset, C., Ponz, D. & Enrique, S. (eds.)Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XV,vol. 351 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,112 (2006)

    2006

  61. [63]

    The IRAF Data Reduction and Analysis System

    Tody, D. The IRAF Data Reduction and Analysis System. In Crawford, D. L. (ed.)Instru- mentation in astronomy VI,vol. 627 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series,733 (1986)

    1986

  62. [64]

    SWarp: Resampling and Co-adding FITS Images Together

    Bertin, E. SWarp: Resampling and Co-adding FITS Images Together. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1010.068 (2010).1010.068

    2010

  63. [65]

    & Arnouts, S

    Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S. SExtractor: Software for source extraction.A&AS117, 393–404 (1996). 31

    1996

  64. [66]

    Huang, B.et al.A Comprehensive Correction of the Gaia DR3 XP Spectra.Astrophys. J. Supp.271, 13 (2024)

    2024

  65. [67]

    Xiao, K.et al.J-PLUS: Photometric Recalibration with the Stellar Color Regression Method and an Improved Gaia XP Synthetic Photometry Method.Astrophys. J. Supp.269, 58 (2023)

    2023

  66. [68]

    A.et al.The Pan-STARRS1 Database and Data Products.Astrophys

    Flewelling, H. A.et al.The Pan-STARRS1 Database and Data Products.Astrophys. J. Supp.251, 7 (2020)

    2020

  67. [69]

    HOTPANTS: High Order Transform of PSF ANd Template Subtraction

    Becker, A. HOTPANTS: High Order Transform of PSF ANd Template Subtraction. Astro- physics Source Code Library, record ascl:1504.004 (2015).1504.004

    2015

  68. [70]

    J.et al.First Results from the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey.Astrophys

    Drake, A. J.et al.First Results from the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey.Astrophys. J.696, 870–884 (2009).0809.1394

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  69. [71]

    M.et al.Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network.Publ

    Brown, T. M.et al.Las Cumbres Observatory Global Telescope Network.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.125, 1031 (2013).1305.2437

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  70. [72]

    Lawrence, A.et al.The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS).Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.379, 1599–1617 (2007).astro-ph/0604426

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  71. [73]

    Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.011 (2016).1609.011

    Bradley, L.et al.Photutils: Photometry tools. Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.011 (2016).1609.011

    2016

  72. [74]

    IRAF in the Nineties

    Tody, D. IRAF in the Nineties. In Hanisch, R. J., Brissenden, R. J. V . & Barnes, J. (eds.) Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems II,vol. 52 ofAstronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series,173 (1993)

    1993

  73. [75]

    Oke, J. B. Faint Spectrophotometric Standard Stars.Astron. J.99, 1621 (1990)

    1990

  74. [76]

    Fan, Z.et al.The Xinglong 2.16-m Telescope: Current Instruments and Scientific Projects. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.128, 115005 (2016).1605.09166

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  75. [77]

    Appenzeller, I.et al.Successful commissioning of FORS1 - the first optical instrument on the VLT.The Messenger94, 1–6 (1998)

    1998

  76. [78]

    & Faran, T

    Cikota, A., Patat, F., Cikota, S. & Faran, T. Linear spectropolarimetry of polarimetric standard stars with VLT/FORS2.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.464, 4146–4159 (2017). 1610.00722. 32

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  77. [79]

    J.902, 46 (2020).1903

    Yang, Y .et al.The Young and Nearby Normal Type Ia Supernova 2018gv: UV-optical Observations and the Earliest Spectropolarimetry.Astrophys. J.902, 46 (2020).1903. 10820

    2020

  78. [80]

    & Romaniello, M

    Patat, F. & Romaniello, M. Error Analysis for Dual-Beam Optical Linear Polarimetry.Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac.118, 146–161 (2006).astro-ph/0509153

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  79. [81]

    Chevalier, R. A. & Soker, N. Asymmetric Envelope Expansion of Supernova 1987A.Astro- phys. J.341, 867 (1989)

    1989

  80. [82]

    L., Haynie, A

    Piro, A. L., Haynie, A. & Yao, Y . Shock Cooling Emission from Extended Material Revisited. Astrophys. J.909, 209 (2021).2007.08543

    arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.