pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10773 · v1 · pith:VIJZTCYEnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Nonequilibrium Green Functions Simulations for Large Correlated Systems

Erik Schroedter , Michael Bonitz , Jan-Philip Joost This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 11:41 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords nonequilibrium Green functionscorrelated dynamicsstochastic decompositiontwo-particle correlationsHubbard modelgraphene nanoribbonslarge-scale simulationspositivity preservation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A fluctuation-based reformulation of nonequilibrium Green functions enables stable correlated simulations up to basis sizes of order 10,000 while retaining linear time scaling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents δNEGF, a quantum-fluctuation version of nonequilibrium Green functions that encodes two-particle correlations as fluctuations δĜ of field-operator products rather than storing the full two-particle function. This change preserves positivity of reduced density matrices and converts the propagation into an ensemble of Hartree-Fock-like trajectories. When paired with a stochastic low-rank decomposition, the scheme keeps the favorable linear scaling in the number of time steps and extends dynamical GW and T-matrix approximations to systems with Nb approximately 10,000. Benchmarks on lattice models confirm stable dynamics even at strong coupling, and the method is applied to diffusion on two-dimensional Hubbard lattices and ultrafast relaxation in graphene nanoribbon heterostructures with long-range interactions.

Core claim

δNEGF represents dynamical two-particle correlations through fluctuations of field-operator products δĜ, which guarantees stable dynamics by preserving positivity of the reduced density matrices, avoids explicit storage of the two-particle Green function, and reduces propagation to a finite ensemble of Hartree-Fock-like trajectories; combined with stochastic low-rank decomposition this retains time-linear scaling and extends GW and T-matrix simulations to Nb∼10^4.

What carries the argument

The quantum-fluctuation formulation that encodes two-particle correlations as fluctuations δĜ of field-operator products, together with stochastic low-rank decomposition.

If this is right

  • Dynamical GW and particle-particle or particle-hole T-matrix simulations become feasible for basis sizes up to order 10,000.
  • Time propagation remains linear in the number of time steps.
  • Stable correlated dynamics are obtained even at strong coupling.
  • Large-scale simulations of diffusion in two-dimensional Hubbard lattices and ultrafast relaxation in graphene nanoribbon heterostructures are demonstrated.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The positivity-preserving property may allow δNEGF to serve as a stable platform for embedding other self-energy approximations beyond GW and T-matrix.
  • The reduction to an ensemble of single-particle trajectories suggests possible hybrid schemes that combine δNEGF with classical or semiclassical sampling methods for even larger systems.
  • Extension to three-dimensional or disordered geometries could be tested by applying the same stochastic decomposition to systems with broken translational symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The representation of two-particle correlations through fluctuations of field-operator products together with the stochastic low-rank decomposition accurately captures the essential dynamical correlations and preserves positivity without significant uncontrolled errors.

What would settle it

A calculation on a lattice system with roughly 1000 basis states at strong coupling where δNEGF results diverge from exact or HF-GKBA benchmarks by more than a few percent in observables such as double occupancy or current.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10773 by Erik Schroedter, Jan-Philip Joost, Michael Bonitz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Levels of self-consistency for the different approaches. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Further analysis of the setup of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Benchmarking of δTPP for the melting of an 11-site CDW chain at [(b)–(c)] U/J = 5 and [(d)–(e)] U/J = 15. Comparison of [(b) and (d)] the density imbalance, Eq. (97) and [(c) and (e)] the correlated double occupation, Eq. (81). We start by studying an 11-site 1D Hubbard chain where the initial state is a charge density wave (CDW) and the sites are either doubly occupied or empty, as sketched in [PITH_FULL… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diffusion of a doubly-occupied circular initial distribution containing 74 particles on a 19 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Further analysis of the setup of Fig [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Diffusion of a doubly-occupied circular initial distribution containing 2514 particles on a 101 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Analysis of the velocity anisotropy of the simula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Ground-state staggered spin-spin correlations as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Nonequilibrium dynamics of the staggered spin-spin correlations for the same system as in Fig. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Real part of the optical conductivity σxx(ω), Eq. (91a), for a half-filled open 1D Hubbard chain of 128 sites in the ground state. Dynamical DMRG (DDMRG) data are taken from Jeckelmann et al. [134]. The vertical orange lines indicate the optical gap given by the exact Bethe ansatz solution for the infinite Hubbard chain. The δGW ground state is generated via adiabatic switching up to a time of tJ/ℏ = 200.… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Time-resolved δGW data for the (charge) dynamic structure factor of an open 12-site Hubbard chain for U/J = 8 before (panel 1), during (panel 2 and 3) and after (panel 4) laser excitation with photon energy ∼ 4.4 J. The initial state is generated via adiabatic switching up to a time of tJ/ℏ = 200. Stars indicate exact reference data by Wang et al.[135] functions. In the present nonequilibrium example, the… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Local retarded density response (103) of (a) Ben￾zene and (c) Naphthalene described in the extended Hubbard model (75). δRPA and δGW+X results are compared to TDH and TDHF data obtained from time-dependent calculations following an infinitesimal kick and to ED data obtained using the QuSpin library [133]. The red arrows indicate the peak positions obtained from a kick calculation using δGW+X. (b) Laser in… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: (a): Sketch of a 7–9-AGNR heterostructure containing 18 unit cells ( 1728 sites). (b, c): Ground state retarded [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p026_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Correlated real-time dynamics in large, spatially inhomogeneous quantum systems remain difficult to access with nonequilibrium many-body methods. Two-time nonequilibrium Green functions (NEGF) retain dynamical correlations but their computational runtime grows cubically with the number of time steps $N_\mathrm{t}$. This scaling bottleneck could recently be overcome by introducing the G1--G2 scheme that is linear in $N_\mathrm{t}$, but requires propagation of a two-particle correlation function and may suffer from numerical instabilities. This has restricted simulations to small systems with $N_\mathrm{b} \sim 10^2$ basis states. Here we introduce a quantum-fluctuation formulation of nonequilibrium Green functions, denoted $\delta$NEGF, that represents dynamical two-particle correlations through fluctuations of field-operator products, $\delta \hat G$. This guarantees stable dynamics by preserving the positivity of the reduced density matrices, avoids the explicit storage of the two-particle Green function, and reduces the propagation to a finite ensemble of Hartree-Fock-like trajectories. Combined with a stochastic low-rank decomposition of the correlation functions, the method retains time-linear scaling while extending dynamical $GW$ and particle-particle and particle-hole $T$-matrix simulations to basis sizes of order $N_\mathrm{b}\sim 10^4$. We benchmark $\delta$NEGF against exact and HF-GKBA results for lattice systems, finding stable correlated dynamics also at strong coupling. We further demonstrate large-scale simulations of diffusion in two-dimensional Hubbard lattices and ultrafast relaxation in graphene nanoribbon heterostructures with long-range Coulomb interactions. These results establish $\delta$NEGF as a scalable route to dynamical self-energy simulations of large, spatially inhomogeneous correlated quantum systems beyond the reach of existing NEGF implementations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces δNEGF, a quantum-fluctuation formulation of nonequilibrium Green functions that represents two-particle correlations via fluctuations δĜ of field-operator products. This is claimed to guarantee stable dynamics through positivity preservation of reduced density matrices, avoid explicit two-particle Green function storage, and reduce propagation to an ensemble of Hartree-Fock-like trajectories. Combined with stochastic low-rank decomposition of the correlation functions, the approach retains time-linear scaling and extends dynamical GW and particle-particle/particle-hole T-matrix simulations to Nb∼10^4. Benchmarks against exact and HF-GKBA results on lattice systems are reported to show stable correlated dynamics at strong coupling, with demonstrations on diffusion in 2D Hubbard lattices and ultrafast relaxation in graphene nanoribbon heterostructures.

Significance. If the stochastic low-rank approximation to δĜ preserves positivity and essential dynamical correlations without uncontrolled errors, the method would represent a substantial advance by overcoming the Nb∼10^2 limit of the G1-G2 scheme and enabling scalable NEGF simulations for large inhomogeneous systems. The time-linear scaling and extension to strong coupling are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Method and benchmarks] The central stability claim rests on the δĜ representation guaranteeing positivity of reduced density matrices even after stochastic low-rank truncation; however, the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or numerical test quantifying positivity violations or truncation errors as a function of rank and Nb in the benchmark comparisons to exact results.
  2. [Results on lattice systems and applications] The extension to Nb∼10^4 for inhomogeneous systems with long-range interactions is load-bearing for the main result, yet the abstract and reported demonstrations lack quantitative error analysis (e.g., deviation from exact or HF-GKBA data at strong coupling) that would confirm the low-rank decomposition captures the essential two-particle correlations without significant uncontrolled approximations.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Introduction] Notation for δĜ and the stochastic ensemble should be defined more explicitly at first use to improve readability for readers unfamiliar with fluctuation-based formulations.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading, positive assessment of the work's significance, and constructive major comments. We address each point below and will implement revisions to strengthen the presentation of the method and results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Method and benchmarks] The central stability claim rests on the δĜ representation guaranteeing positivity of reduced density matrices even after stochastic low-rank truncation; however, the manuscript provides no explicit derivation or numerical test quantifying positivity violations or truncation errors as a function of rank and Nb in the benchmark comparisons to exact results.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit treatment of positivity under truncation is needed. The exact δĜ dynamics preserve positivity of the reduced density matrices by construction, as the fluctuation operators are defined directly from the full many-body state (see Sec. II). For the stochastic low-rank case we will add a short derivation in the methods section showing the conditions for approximate preservation, together with numerical tests in the benchmarks (new panel or appendix) that report the lowest eigenvalue of the one-particle density matrix versus rank for the lattice systems, directly compared to exact results. This will quantify any violations as a function of rank and Nb. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results on lattice systems and applications] The extension to Nb∼10^4 for inhomogeneous systems with long-range interactions is load-bearing for the main result, yet the abstract and reported demonstrations lack quantitative error analysis (e.g., deviation from exact or HF-GKBA data at strong coupling) that would confirm the low-rank decomposition captures the essential two-particle correlations without significant uncontrolled approximations.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes the value of quantitative error metrics. While the manuscript already shows qualitative stability and agreement with exact/HF-GKBA data for small systems, we will revise the abstract to include a brief statement on observed error magnitudes and add a table or figure panel in the results section reporting relative deviations in observables (density, energy, or correlation functions) versus rank and interaction strength for the benchmark lattices. For the Nb∼10^4 demonstrations we will include rank-convergence checks where feasible. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; new formulation with external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper introduces δNEGF as a distinct quantum-fluctuation representation of two-particle correlations via δĜ fluctuations, explicitly designed to preserve positivity and avoid explicit two-particle Green function storage. It is benchmarked against exact results and HF-GKBA for lattice systems, providing independent validation. The reference to the prior G1-G2 scheme serves only as historical context for the scaling limitation being addressed and is not used to justify the new method's correctness. No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citation chains appear in the derivation chain. The stochastic low-rank decomposition is presented as an additional technical step, not a redefinition of the core claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be exhaustively identified; the method introduces a new representation for correlations.

invented entities (1)
  • δĜ (fluctuations of field-operator products) no independent evidence
    purpose: Represent dynamical two-particle correlations while preserving positivity of reduced density matrices
    Introduced to avoid explicit two-particle Green function storage and ensure numerical stability

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5848 in / 1318 out tokens · 30916 ms · 2026-06-27T11:41:47.944511+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

192 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Symmetries of the generalized susceptibilities Conservation laws are directly linked to symmetries (Noether’s theorems). In NEGF theory conserving approx- imations are linked to symmetries of the two-particle two- time Green function G(2) or of the self-energy [51, 52, 110]: G(2) ijkl(z1, z2, z+ 1 , z+ 2 ) =G (2) jilk(z2, z1, z+ 2 , z+ 1 ).(B1) While most...

  2. [2]

    Energy conservation in the particle-particle channel We start by considering the particle-particle channel. Here, we do not consider the symmetrized expression given by χc,K for the investigation of energy conservation, as the greater and lesser components χpp,≷ already satisfy the necessary exchange symmetry (B2a). In the particle- particle channel, this...

  3. [3]

    Energy conservation in the particle-hole channels Next, we consider the particle-hole channels. For com- pleteness, we will, at this point, give the expression for the equations of motion for the generalized susceptibilities in their lowest-order approximations that we have discussed, the approximation of second moments (55): iℏ∂tχc,≷(t) = h0,c(t) +h cor,...

  4. [4]

    Keimer and J

    B. Keimer and J. E. Moore, The physics of quantum materials, Nature Physics13, 1045 (2017)

    2017

  5. [5]

    Dzsaber, D

    S. Dzsaber, D. A. Zocco, A. McCollam, F. Weick- ert, R. McDonald, M. Taupin, G. Eguchi, X. Yan, A. Prokofiev, L. M. K. Tang, B. Vlaar, L. E. Winter, M. Jaime, Q. Si, and S. Paschen, Control of electronic topology in a strongly correlated electron system, Nature Communications13, 5729 (2022)

    2022

  6. [6]

    R. A. Hart, P. M. Duarte, T.-L. Yang, X. Liu, T. Paiva, E. Khatami, R. T. Scalettar, N. Trivedi, D. A. Huse, and R. G. Hulet, Observation of antiferromagnetic cor- relations in the hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nature519, 211 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    Onofrio and L

    R. Onofrio and L. Salasnich, Ultracold atoms as strongly correlated systems, inPhysics and Technology of Ultra- cold Atomic Gases(Springer Nature Switzerland, Cham,

  8. [8]

    Vorberger, F

    J. Vorberger, F. Graziani, D. Riley, A. D. Baczewski, I. Baraffe, M. Bethkenhagen, S. Blouin, M. P. B¨ ohme, M. Bonitz, M. Bussmann, A. Casner, W. Cayzac, P. Cel- liers, G. Chabrier, N. Chamel, D. Chapman, M. Chen, J. Clerouin, G. Collins, F. Coppari, T. D¨ oppner, T. Dorn- heim, L. B. Fletcher, D. O. Gericke, S. Glenzer, A. F. Goncharov, G. Gregori, S. H...

    2026

  9. [9]

    Dornheim, S

    T. Dornheim, S. Groth, and M. Bonitz, The uniform electron gas at warm dense matter conditions, Phys. Rep. 744, 1 (2018)

    2018

  10. [10]

    Gross, E

    F. Gross, E. Klempt, S. J. Brodsky, A. J. Buras, V. D. Burkert, G. Heinrich, K. Jakobs, C. A. Meyer, K. Orginos, M. Strickland,et al., 50 years of quantum chromodynamics, The European Physical Journal C83, 1125 (2023)

    2023

  11. [11]

    Niggas, J

    A. Niggas, J. Schwestka, K. Balzer, D. Weichselbaum, N. Schl¨ unzen, R. Heller, S. Creutzburg, H. Inani, M. Tri- pathi, C. Speckmann, N. McEvoy, T. Susi, J. Kotakoski, Z. Gan, A. George, A. Turchanin, M. Bonitz, F. Au- mayr, and R. A. Wilhelm, Ion-Induced Surface Charge Dynamics in Freestanding Monolayers of Graphene and MoS2 Probed by the Emission of Ele...

    2022

  12. [12]

    Schneider, L

    U. Schneider, L. Hackerm¨ uller, J. P. Ronzheimer, S. Will, S. Braun, T. Best, I. Bloch, E. Demler, S. Mandt, D. Rasch, and A. Rosch, Fermionic transport and out-of- equilibrium dynamics in a homogeneous Hubbard model with ultracold atoms, Nat. Phys.8, 213 (2012)

    2012

  13. [13]

    Schl¨ unzen, S

    N. Schl¨ unzen, S. Hermanns, M. Bonitz, and C. Verdozzi, Dynamics of strongly correlated fermions:Ab initiore- sults for two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B93, 035107 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    Schl¨ unzen and M

    N. Schl¨ unzen and M. Bonitz, Nonequilibrium Green Functions Approach to Strongly Correlated Fermions in Lattice Systems, Contrib. Plasma Phys.56, 5 (2016)

    2016

  15. [15]

    Lisowski, P

    M. Lisowski, P. A. Loukakos, A. Melnikov, I. Radu, L. Ungureanu, M. Wolf, and U. Bovensiepen, Femtosec- ond electron and spin dynamics in gd(0001) studied by time-resolved photoemission and magneto-optics, Phys. Rev. Lett.95, 137402 (2005)

    2005

  16. [16]

    A. L. Cavalieri, N. M¨ uller, T. Uphues, V. S. Yakovlev, A. Baltuˇ ska, B. Horvath, B. Schmidt, L. Bl¨ umel, R. Holzwarth, S. Hendel, M. Drescher, U. Kleineberg, P. M. Echenique, R. Kienberger, F. Krausz, and U. Heinz- mann, Attosecond spectroscopy in condensed matter, Nature449, 1029 (2007)

    2007

  17. [17]

    Sch¨ utte, S

    B. Sch¨ utte, S. Bauch, U. Fr¨ uhling, M. Wieland, M. Gen- sch, E. Pl¨ onjes, T. Gaumnitz, A. Azima, M. Bonitz, and M. Drescher, Evidence for chirped Auger-electron emission, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 253003 (2012)

    2012

  18. [18]

    de la Torre, D

    A. de la Torre, D. M. Kennes, M. Claassen, S. Gerber, J. W. McIver, and M. A. Sentef, Colloquium: Nonther- mal pathways to ultrafast control in quantum materials, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 041002 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Joost and M

    J.-P. Joost and M. Bonitz, Ultrafast charge separation induced by a uniform field in graphene nanoribbons, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L032068 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Y. Li, E. Rojas-Gatjens, Y. Guo, B. Yang, D. Sun, L. Holtzman, J. Oh, K. Barmak, C. R. Dean, J. C. Hone, N. Gabor, E. A. Arsenault, and X. Zhu, Pho- toinduced Metal-to-Insulator Transitions in 2D Moir´ e Devices, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 206502 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Fausti , author R

    D. Fausti, R. I. Tobey, N. Dean, S. Kaiser, A. Dienst, M. C. Hoffmann, S. Pyon, T. Takayama, H. Takagi, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced superconductivity in a stripe-ordered cuprate, Science331, 189 (2011), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1197294

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1197294 2011

  22. [22]

    Buzzi, D

    M. Buzzi, D. Nicoletti, M. Fechner, N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. A. Sentef, A. Georges, T. Biesner, E. Uykur, M. Dres- sel, A. Henderson, T. Siegrist, J. A. Schlueter, K. Miya- gawa, K. Kanoda, M.-S. Nam, A. Ardavan, J. Coulthard, J. Tindall, F. Schlawin, D. Jaksch, and A. Cavalleri, Pho- tomolecular high-temperature superconductivity, Phys. Rev. X10, 031028 (2020)

    2020

  23. [23]

    J. W. McIver, B. Schulte, F.-U. Stein, T. Matsuyama, G. Jotzu, G. Meier, and A. Cavalleri, Light-induced anomalous Hall effect in graphene, Nat. Phys.16, 38 (2020)

    2020

  24. [24]

    A. S. Disa, J. Curtis, M. Fechner, A. Liu, A. von Hoegen, M. F¨ orst, T. F. Nova, P. Narang, A. Maljuk, A. V. Boris, B. Keimer, and A. Cavalleri, Photo-induced high- temperature ferromagnetism in ytio3, Nature617, 73 (2023)

    2023

  25. [25]

    Caruso, M

    F. Caruso, M. A. Sentef, C. Attaccalite, M. Bonitz, C. Draxl, U. De Giovannini, M. Eckstein, R. Ernstor- fer, M. Fechner, M. Gr¨ uning, H. H¨ ubener, J.-P. Joost, D. M. Juraschek, C. Karrasch, D. M. Kennes, S. Latini, I.-T. Lu, O. Neufeld, E. Perfetto, L. Rettig, R. R. Pela, A. Rubio, J. F. Rudzinski, M. Ruggenthaler, D. San- galli, M. Sch¨ uler, S. Shall...

    2025

  26. [26]

    Joost, A.-P

    J.-P. Joost, A.-P. Jauho, and M. Bonitz, Correlated topological states in graphene nanoribbon heterostruc- tures, Nano Letters19, 9045 (2019), pMID: 31735027, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04075

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.9b04075 2019

  27. [27]

    Liu and M

    X. Liu and M. C. Hersam, 2d materials for quantum information science, Nature Reviews Materials4, 669 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Wolfowicz, F

    G. Wolfowicz, F. J. Heremans, C. P. Anderson, S. Kanai, H. Seo, A. Gali, G. Galli, and D. D. Awschalom, Quan- tum guidelines for solid-state spin defects, Nature Re- views Materials6, 906 (2021)

    2021

  29. [29]

    Calegari, D

    F. Calegari, D. Ayuso, A. Trabattoni, L. Belshaw, S. D. Camillis, S. Anumula, F. Frassetto, L. Poletto, A. Palacios, P. Decleva, J. B. Greenwood, F. Mart´ ın, and M. Nisoli, Ultrafast electron dynamics in phenylalanine initiated by attosecond pulses, Science346, 336 (2014), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1254061

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1254061 2014

  30. [30]

    H. J. W¨ orner, C. A. Arrell, N. Banerji, A. Cannizzo, M. Chergui, A. K. Das, P. Hamm, U. Keller, P. M. Kraus, E. Liberatore, P. Lopez-Tarifa, M. Lucchini, M. Meuwly, C. Milne, J.-E. Moser, U. Rothlisberger, G. Smolent- sev, J. Teuscher, J. A. van Bokhoven, and O. Wenger, Charge migration and charge transfer in molecular sys- tems, Structural Dynamics4, 0...

    2017

  31. [31]

    Nisoli, P

    M. Nisoli, P. Decleva, F. Calegari, A. Palacios, and F. Mart´ ın, Attosecond electron dynamics in molecules, Chemical Reviews117, 10760 (2017)

    2017

  32. [32]

    Palacios and F

    A. Palacios and F. Mart´ ın, The quantum chemistry of attosecond molecular science, WIREs Com- putational Molecular Science10, e1430 (2020), https://wires.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/wcms.1430

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1430 2020

  33. [33]

    Calegari and F

    F. Calegari and F. Mart´ ın, Open questions in attochem- istry, Communications Chemistry6, 184 (2023)

    2023

  34. [34]

    F¨ ohlisch, P

    A. F¨ ohlisch, P. Feulner, F. Hennies, A. Fink, D. Menzel, D. Sanchez-Portal, P. M. Echenique, and W. Wurth, Direct observation of electron dynamics in the attosecond domain, Nature436, 373 (2005)

    2005

  35. [35]

    C. D. Lindstrom and X.-Y. Zhu, Photoinduced electron transfer at molecule–metal interfaces, Chemical Reviews 106, 4281 (2006)

    2006

  36. [36]

    R. D. Mui˜ no, D. S´ anchez-Portal, V. M. Silkin, E. V. Chulkov, and P. M. Echenique, Time-dependent electron phenomena at surfaces, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 971 (2011), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1008517107

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1008517107 2011

  37. [37]

    Aguilar-Galindo, A

    F. Aguilar-Galindo, A. G. Borisov, and S. D´ ıaz-Tendero, Ultrafast dynamics of electronic resonances in molecules adsorbed on metal surfaces: A wave packet propagation approach, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation 17, 639 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Inzani and M

    G. Inzani and M. Lucchini, Attosecond electron dynamics in solid-state systems, Journal of Physics: Photonics7, 022001 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    X. Hong, J. Kim, S.-F. Shi, Y. Zhang, C. Jin, Y. Sun, S. Tongay, J. Wu, Y. Zhang, and F. Wang, Ultrafast charge transfer in atomically thin mos2/ws2 heterostruc- tures, Nature Nanotechnology9, 682 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    C. Jin, E. Y. Ma, O. Karni, E. C. Regan, F. Wang, and T. F. Heinz, Ultrafast dynamics in van der waals heterostructures, Nature Nanotechnology13, 994 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    Rivera, H

    P. Rivera, H. Yu, K. L. Seyler, N. P. Wilson, W. Yao, and X. Xu, Interlayer valley excitons in heterobilayers of transition metal dichalcogenides, Nature Nanotechnology 13, 1004 (2018)

    2018

  42. [42]

    Cederbaum and J

    L. Cederbaum and J. Zobeley, Ultrafast charge migration by electron correlation, Chemical Physics Letters307, 205 (1999)

    1999

  43. [43]

    Calegari, A

    F. Calegari, A. Trabattoni, A. Palacios, D. Ayuso, M. C. Castrovilli, J. B. Greenwood, P. Decleva, F. Mart´ ın, and M. Nisoli, Charge migration induced by attosec- ond pulses in bio-relevant molecules, Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics49, 142001 (2016)

    2016

  44. [44]

    Ovesen, S

    S. Ovesen, S. Brem, C. Linder¨ alv, M. Kuisma, T. Korn, P. Erhart, M. Selig, and E. Malic, Interlayer exciton dynamics in van der waals heterostructures, Communi- cations Physics2, 23 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    Balzer and M

    K. Balzer and M. Bonitz,Nonequilibrium Green’s Func- tions Approach to Inhomogeneous Systems(Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2013)

    2013

  46. [46]

    X. Li, N. Govind, C. Isborn, A. E. DePrince III, and K. Lopata, Real-time time-dependent electronic struc- ture theory, Chemical Reviews120, 9951 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    Tancogne-Dejean, M

    N. Tancogne-Dejean, M. J. T. Oliveira, X. Andrade, H. Appel, C. H. Borca, G. Le Breton, F. Buchholz, A. Castro, S. Corni, A. A. Correa, U. De Giovannini, A. Delgado, F. G. Eich, J. Flick, G. Gil, A. Gomez, N. Helbig, H. H¨ ubener, R. Jest¨ adt, J. Jornet-Somoza, A. H. Larsen, I. V. Lebedeva, M. L¨ uders, M. A. L. Mar- ques, S. T. Ohlmann, S. Pipolo, M. Ra...

    2020

  48. [48]

    H. Wang, J. Bang, Y. Sun, L. Liang, D. West, V. Meu- nier, and S. Zhang, The role of collective motion in the ultrafast charge transfer in van der waals heterostruc- tures, Nature Communications7, 11504 (2016)

    2016

  49. [49]

    Biswas, A

    S. Biswas, A. Trabattoni, P. Rupp, M. Magrakvelidze, M. E.-A. Madjet, U. D. Giovannini, M. C. Castrovilli, M. Galli, Q. Liu, E. P. M˚ ansson, J. Sch¨ otz, V. Wanie, P. Wnuk, L. Colaizzi, D. Mocci, M. Reduzzi, M. Lucchini, M. Nisoli, A. Rubio, H. S. Chakraborty, M. F. Kling, and F. Calegari, Correlation-driven attosecond photoemis- sion delay in the plasmo...

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.ads0494 2025

  50. [50]

    Guiot du Doignon, R

    C. Guiot du Doignon, R. Sinha-Roy, F. Rabilloud, and V. Despr´ e, Correlation-driven charge migration triggered by infrared multi-photon ionization, Chemical Science 16, 16729 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    N. T. Maitra, Double and charge-transfer excitations in time-dependent density functional theory, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry73, 117 (2022)

    2022

  52. [52]

    Lacombe and N

    L. Lacombe and N. T. Maitra, Non-adiabatic approx- imations in time-dependent density functional theory: progress and prospects, npj Computational Materials9, 124 (2023)

    2023

  53. [53]

    L. V. Keldysh, Diagram technique for nonequilibrium processes, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47, 1515 (1964)

    1964

  54. [54]

    L. P. Kadanoff and G. Baym,Quantum Statistical Mechanics: Green’s Function Methods in Equilibrium and Nonequilibrium Problems(CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1962)

    1962

  55. [55]

    Stefanucci and R

    G. Stefanucci and R. v. Leeuwen,Nonequilibrium Many- Body Theory of Quantum Systems: A Modern Introduc- 34 tion(Cambridge University Press, 2013)

    2013

  56. [56]

    Bonitz, R

    M. Bonitz, R. Nareyka, and D. S. (eds.),Progress in Nonequilibrium Green’s Functions: Proceedings of the Conference ”Kadanoff-Baym Equations: Progress and Perspectives for Many-body Physics”, Rostock, Germany, 20-24 September 1999(World Scientific Publ., Singapore, 2000)

    1999

  57. [57]

    Bonitz and D

    M. Bonitz and D. S. (eds.),Progress in Nonequilibrium Green’s Functions II(World Scientific, Singapore, 2003)

    2003

  58. [58]

    Stefanucci, A

    G. Stefanucci, A. Marini, and S. Bellucci, Non- equilibrium green’s functions, physica status solidi (b) 256, 1900335 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    H. U. Strand, C. Verdozzi, and M. Bonitz, Progress in Non-equilibrium Green’s Functions VIII (PNGF VIII), phys. stat. sol. (b)261, 2400341 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    K¨ ohler, N

    H. K¨ ohler, N. Kwong, and H. A. Yousif, A fortran code for solving the kadanoff–baym equations for a homoge- neous fermion system, Computer Physics Communica- tions123, 123 (1999)

    1999

  61. [61]

    Sch¨ uler, D

    M. Sch¨ uler, D. Goleˇ z, Y. Murakami, N. Bittner, A. Her- rmann, H. U. Strand, P. Werner, and M. Eckstein, Nessi: The non-equilibrium systems simulation package, Com- puter Physics Communications257, 107484 (2020)

    2020

  62. [62]

    Marini, C

    A. Marini, C. Hogan, M. Gr¨ uning, and D. Varsano, yambo: An ab initio tool for excited state calculations, Comput. Phys. Commun.180, 1392 (2009)

    2009

  63. [63]

    N. E. Dahlen and R. van Leeuwen, Solving the Kadanoff- Baym Equations for Inhomogeneous Systems: Appli- cation to Atoms and Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.98, 153004 (2007)

    2007

  64. [64]

    A. Stan, N. E. Dahlen, and R. van Leeuwen, Time prop- agation of the kadanoff–baym equations for inhomoge- neous systems, The Journal of Chemical Physics130, 224101 (2009)

    2009

  65. [65]

    M. P. von Friesen, C. Verdozzi, and C.-O. Almbladh, Successes and Failures of Kadanoff-Baym Dynamics in Hubbard Nanoclusters, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 176404 (2009)

    2009

  66. [66]

    Balzer, M

    K. Balzer, M. R. Rasmussen, N. Schl¨ unzen, J.-P. Joost, and M. Bonitz, Doublon Formation by Ions Impacting a Strongly Correlated Finite Lattice System, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 267602 (2018)

    2018

  67. [67]

    Joost, N

    J.-P. Joost, N. Schl¨ unzen, and M. Bonitz, Femtosec- ond Electron Dynamics in Graphene Nanoribbons – A Nonequilibrium Green Functions Approach Within an Extended Hubbard Model, Phys. Status Solidi B256, 1800498 (2019)

    2019

  68. [68]

    Joost, N

    J.-P. Joost, N. Schl¨ unzen, S. Hese, M. Bonitz, C. Ver- dozzi, P. Schmitteckert, and M. Hopjan, L¨ owdin’s symmetry dilemma within Green functions theory for the one-dimensional Hubbard model, Contributions to Plasma Physics61, e202000220 (2021), e202000220 ctpp.202000220

    2021

  69. [69]

    Schl¨ unzen, J.-P

    N. Schl¨ unzen, J.-P. Joost, and M. Bonitz, Achieving the Scaling Limit for Nonequilibrium Green Functions Simulations, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 076601 (2020)

    2020

  70. [70]

    Lipavsk´ y, V.ˇSpiˇ cka, and B

    P. Lipavsk´ y, V.ˇSpiˇ cka, and B. Velick´ y, Generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz for deriving quantum transport equations, Phys. Rev. B34, 6933 (1986)

    1986

  71. [71]

    Joost, N

    J.-P. Joost, N. Schl¨ unzen, and M. Bonitz, G1-G2 scheme: Dramatic acceleration of nonequilibrium Green func- tions simulations within the Hartree-Fock generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz, Phys. Rev. B101, 245101 (2020)

    2020

  72. [72]

    Joost, N

    J.-P. Joost, N. Schl¨ unzen, H. Ohldag, M. Bonitz, F. Lack- ner, and I. Brezinova, The dynamically screened ladder approximation: Simultaneous treatment of strong elec- tronic correlations and dynamical screening out of equi- librium, Phys. Rev. B105, 165155 (2022)

    2022

  73. [73]

    Donsa, F

    S. Donsa, F. Lackner, J. Burgd¨ orfer, M. Bonitz, B. Kloss, A. Rubio, and I. Brezinova, Non-Equilibrium correlation dynamics in the one-dimensional Fermi-Hubbard model: A testbed for the two-particle reduced density matrix theory, Phys. Rev. Research5, 033022 (2023)

    2023

  74. [74]

    Pavlyukh, R

    Y. Pavlyukh, R. Tuovinen, E. Perfetto, and G. Stefanucci, Cheers: A Linear-Scaling KBE+GKBA Code, physica status solidi (b)261, 2300504 (2024)

    2024

  75. [75]

    Borkowski, N

    L. Borkowski, N. Schl¨ unzen, J.-P. Joost, F. Reiser, and M. Bonitz, Doublon production in correlated materials by multiple ion impacts, physica status solidi (b)259, 2100511 (2022)

    2022

  76. [76]

    Lovato, M

    G. Lovato, M. Bonitz, K. Balzer, F. Caruso, and J.-P. Joost, Electronic correlation effects in the response of graphene and MoS 2 monolayers to the impact of highly- charged ions, phys. stat. sol. (b) , e202500458 (2025)

    2025

  77. [77]

    Tuovinen, Y

    R. Tuovinen, Y. Pavlyukh, E. Perfetto, and G. Stefanucci, Time-linear quantum transport simulations with corre- lated nonequilibrium green’s functions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 246301 (2023)

    2023

  78. [78]

    Balzer, N

    K. Balzer, N. Schl¨ unzen, H. Ohldag, J.-P. Joost, and M. Bonitz, Accelerating nonequilibrium Green function simulations with embedding self-energies, Phys. Rev. B 107, 155141 (2023)

    2023

  79. [79]

    Cosco, R

    F. Cosco, R. Tuovinen, and N. Lo Gullo, Interacting Electrons in a Flat-Band System within the Generalized Kadanoff–Baym Ansatz, physica status solidi (b)261, 2300561 (2024)

    2024

  80. [80]

    Pavlyukh and R

    Y. Pavlyukh and R. Tuovinen, Open system dynamics in linear time beyond the wide-band limit, Phys. Rev. B 111, L241101 (2025)

    2025

Showing first 80 references.