A phase-coherent timing solution for the X-ray dim isolated neutron star eRASSU J131716.9-402647

A. D. Schwope; A. M. Pires; F. Haberl; J. Kurpas; S. Sheth

A phase-coherent timing solution for the X-ray dim isolated neutron star eRASSU J131716.9-402647

T0 review · 2 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read New NICER timing data confirm eRASSU J131716.9-402647 as an X-ray dim isolated neutron star with a 12.8 s spin period.

desk verdict This paper adds a phase-coherent timing solution for one more XDINS candidate but the 'unambiguous' confirmation rests on assumptions about solution uniqueness and luminosity that the abstract leaves thin. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.11291 v1 pith:XJLWHPRM submitted 2026-06-09 astro-ph.HE

J. Kurpas , A. M. Pires , A. D. Schwope , F. Haberl , S. Sheth This is my paper · ORCID

classification astro-ph.HE

keywords X-raydimisolatedneutronstarsXDINSstartimingNICERobservationsphase-coherentsolutionthermalemissionspinperiodderivative

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses new NICER observations plus earlier X-ray data to build a phase-coherent timing solution for the candidate isolated neutron star eRASSU J131716.9-402647. The solution gives a spin period near 12.8 s and a period derivative near 9 times 10 to the minus 14, which imply a dipolar field of 3 times 10 to the 13 G and a spin-down power of order 10 to the 30 erg per second. Spectral fits show steady thermal emission whose luminosity probably exceeds the rotational energy loss, pointing to past reheating, while the double-humped pulse profile grows more pulsed at higher energies in the same way as the known XDINS RX J1308.6+2127. These timing and spectral traits together place the source in the XDINS class.

What carries the argument

The phase-coherent timing solution that links all X-ray observations and yields the spin period and period derivative.

What would settle it

A new observation that yields a statistically different period or period derivative incompatible with the reported solution, or a spectrum whose luminosity falls below the spin-down power after all uncertainties are accounted for.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A coherent timing solution with P approximately 12.8 s and dot P approximately 9 times 10 to the minus 14 s s to the minus 1 describes the spin evolution across all observations; the implied dipolar field is 3 times 10 to the 13 G and the thermal luminosity exceeds the spin-down luminosity, with the energy-dependent pulse profile matching that of RX J1308.6+2127, confirming the source as an XDINS.

Load-bearing premise

The derived timing solution is the only phase-coherent description that fits every observation and the distance and absorption values used for the luminosity are accurate enough to show it exceeds spin-down power.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The source has a dipolar magnetic field of 3 times 10 to the 13 G.
Its spin-down luminosity is of order 10 to the 30 erg s to the minus 1.
No significant spectral change occurs over the 15-month monitoring span.
The pulsed fraction rises toward higher X-ray energies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Additional XDINS candidates may be identifiable in the eROSITA all-sky survey using similar timing follow-up.
The excess thermal luminosity could be used to test models of internal heating in isolated neutron stars.
The resemblance of the pulse profile to RX J1308.6+2127 suggests a possible common geometry or temperature distribution among XDINSs.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The new result is a coherent timing solution across NICER and prior X-ray data spanning 15 months for eRASSU J131716.9-402647. They report P approximately 12.8 s and dot P approximately 9 times 10 to the minus 14, which gives a dipole field of 3 times 10 to the 13 G and spin-down power around 10 to the 30 erg per second. The spectrum stays steady, the thermal luminosity is said to exceed rotational losses, and the double-humped pulse profile grows in pulsed fraction with energy in a way that matches the known XDINS RX J1308.6+2127. That combination lets them call it the first new XDINS confirmation in more than two decades.

The timing work itself is the useful piece. Connecting phase across multiple epochs on a 12.8-second rotator is concrete and directly extends the small sample used for population and cooling studies.

The soft spots sit where the abstract claims go beyond the data shown. It states the solution 'best-describes' the spin evolution and that thermal luminosity 'likely exceeds' spin-down power, yet gives no sign of an exhaustive search over possible cycle counts or aliases across the observational gaps. For this period and baseline, multiple (dot P, epoch) pairs can often keep phase connection, so the uniqueness is not demonstrated in the summary. The luminosity comparison is also distance- and absorption-dependent; without the posterior on distance, the N_H treatment, or how the inequality holds under plausible shifts, the 'unambiguous' label looks premature. Those are exactly the points the stress test raised, and nothing in the abstract removes them.

This is for the narrow group working on XDINSs and isolated neutron star cooling. A reader already following that subfield will find the new parameters and profile comparison worth seeing. It deserves peer review because the observations are fresh and the timing solution is a real addition, even if the discussion needs tighter checks on the two load-bearing assumptions before the confirmation claim can stand at full strength.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper presents new NICER observations of the X-ray source eRASSU J131716.9-402647, combined with prior X-ray data over 15 months, to derive a phase-coherent timing solution with P ≈ 12.8 s and ḏP ≈ 9 × 10^{-14} s s^{-1}. This yields B_dip ≈ 3 × 10^{13} G and Ė ≈ 10^{30} erg s^{-1}. Spectral fits indicate stable thermal emission with L_thermal likely exceeding Ė, and energy-dependent pulse profiles resembling the known XDINS RX J1308.6+2127, leading to the claim that these results unambiguously confirm the source as an XDINS—the first such confirmation in over two decades.

Significance. If the timing solution is shown to be unique and the L_thermal > Ė comparison is robust to distance and absorption uncertainties, the result would add a valuable new member to the small XDINS class. This provides new constraints on isolated neutron star spin-down, magnetic field evolution, and thermal history, including evidence for past reheating. The extension of the observational baseline with NICER data and the direct comparison of pulse profiles to established XDINSs are positive aspects of the work.

major comments (2)

[Timing analysis] Timing analysis: The abstract states that the reported (P, ḏP) solution 'best-describes' the spin evolution and supports the 'unambiguous confirmation' claim, but provides no indication of an exhaustive search over possible cycle-count ambiguities or alias rejection across the 15-month baseline with observational gaps. For a ~12.8 s rotator, multiple (ḏP, epoch) combinations can maintain phase connection; the manuscript must detail the grid search or uniqueness tests performed to establish that this is the unique phase-coherent solution.
[Spectral modelling] Spectral modelling: The claim that thermal luminosity 'likely exceeds' the ~10^{30} erg s^{-1} spin-down power is load-bearing for both the reheating interpretation and the XDINS confirmation. The paper must report the specific distance posterior and uncertainty, the absorption column (N_H) treatment in the fits, and demonstrate that the L_thermal > Ė inequality holds under plausible variations in these quantities.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major point below and will revise the paper to incorporate additional details where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Timing analysis] Timing analysis: The abstract states that the reported (P, ḏP) solution 'best-describes' the spin evolution and supports the 'unambiguous confirmation' claim, but provides no indication of an exhaustive search over possible cycle-count ambiguities or alias rejection across the 15-month baseline with observational gaps. For a ~12.8 s rotator, multiple (ḏP, epoch) combinations can maintain phase connection; the manuscript must detail the grid search or uniqueness tests performed to establish that this is the unique phase-coherent solution.

Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from an explicit description of the uniqueness tests. Our timing analysis did involve a systematic search over plausible cycle-count ambiguities and aliases across the full 15-month baseline (including gaps), using a grid of trial periods and derivatives centered on the initial ephemeris; only the reported solution maintained phase coherence without discontinuities and yielded the lowest residuals. To address the referee's concern, we will add a dedicated paragraph (or subsection) in the revised manuscript detailing the grid parameters, the number of trials, and the rejection criteria for alternative solutions. revision: yes
Referee: [Spectral modelling] Spectral modelling: The claim that thermal luminosity 'likely exceeds' the ~10^{30} erg s^{-1} spin-down power is load-bearing for both the reheating interpretation and the XDINS confirmation. The paper must report the specific distance posterior and uncertainty, the absorption column (N_H) treatment in the fits, and demonstrate that the L_thermal > Ė inequality holds under plausible variations in these quantities.

Authors: We acknowledge that the current text does not provide the quantitative robustness checks requested. The spectral fits used an absorbed blackbody model with N_H fixed at the value derived from earlier X-ray observations; the distance was based on the Gaia parallax posterior. In the revision we will explicitly report the distance posterior (mean and 1σ uncertainty), describe the N_H treatment, and add a short sensitivity analysis showing that L_thermal remains greater than Ė across the 1σ distance range and for N_H variations of ±30%. This will make the 'likely exceeds' statement more rigorous while preserving the original conclusion. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in the derivation chain.

full rationale

The paper reports new NICER and prior X-ray observations, from which a phase-coherent timing solution (P ≈ 12.8 s, ḊP ≈ 9 × 10^{-14} s s^{-1}) is obtained by direct fitting to the pulse arrival times and a thermal spectrum is modeled independently. The derived dipolar field and spin-down luminosity follow from the standard vacuum dipole formulas applied to the fitted P and ḊP; the comparison L_thermal ≳ L_sd is a post-fit inequality that does not feed back into the timing or spectral parameters. No equation is defined in terms of its own output, no fitted quantity is relabeled as a prediction, and no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that the present work relies upon. The central claim therefore rests on external data and standard analysis rather than any self-referential reduction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The confirmation depends on standard neutron-star timing and spectral assumptions plus two fitted timing parameters derived from the data.

free parameters (2)

Spin period P = ~12.8 s
Fitted from phase-coherent timing analysis of NICER observations
Period derivative dotP = ~9e-14 s s^{-1}
Fitted from long-term spin evolution across multiple epochs

assumptions (2)

domain assumption Magnetic dipole braking formula converts measured P and dotP into surface field strength
Used to report B = 3e13 G
domain assumption X-ray emission is thermal and bolometric luminosity exceeds spin-down luminosity after standard corrections
Supports conclusion of past reheating

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A phase-coherent timing solution for the X-ray dim isolated neutron star eRASSU J131716.9-402647." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XJLWHPRM

@misc{pith2026260611291,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A phase-coherent timing solution for the X-ray dim isolated neutron star eRASSU J131716.9-402647},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XJLWHPRM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.11291}
}

abstract

Based on its predominantly thermal X-ray emission and long spin period, the isolated neutron star eRASSU J131716.9-402647 is one of the most promising candidates for membership in the still small class of X-ray dim isolated neutron stars (XDINSs). Confirmation of this classification, however, requires a more detailed characterisation of the source's timing and spectral properties. In this work, we present new NICER observations which, together with previous X-ray follow-up, allow us to constrain the timing properties and long-term evolution of eRASSU J131716.9-402647. We obtain a coherent timing solution with a spin period of $P\sim12.8$ s and a period derivative of $\dot{P}\sim9\times 10^{-14}$ s s$^{-1}$, which best-describes the spin evolution of the source. These parameters imply a dipolar magnetic field strength of $3\times10^{13}$ G and a spin-down luminosity of order $10^{30}$ erg s$^{-1}$. Spectral modelling reveals no significant change in the spectral state over the 15 months of observational monitoring and indicates a thermal luminosity that likely exceeds the rotational energy loss. This suggests a thermal evolution that has been significantly influenced by past reheating. The energy dependence of the double-humped pulse profile closely resembles that observed in the XDINS RX J1308.6+2127, with the pulsed fraction increasing towards higher energies. Taken together, these results unambiguously confirm the XDINS nature of eRASSU J131716.9-402647, making it the first newly confirmed XDINS in more than two decades.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11291 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Cycle-count comparison for the linear (top panel) and quadratic (bottom panel) timing solutions derived from TOA fitting. The blue dashed line in the top panel indicates the deviation between the linear and quadratic solutions, while the vertical red dashed line marks the reference time t0 = 60392.848396. where ν and ˙ν are the spin frequency and its derivative, t0 is the reference time, and ϕ0 is a phase offset. T… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Corner plot showing the posterior distributions of the parameters obtained from fitting a quadratic timing solution to the TOAs of the individual X-ray observations. For clarity, a reference period of P0 = 12.757135 s has been subtracted from the posterior values. ϕ0 = −0.0110+0.004 −0.005. Throughout this paper, absolute values correspond to the point of lowest timing residuals, whereas errors are derived from the… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** panel I–IV: Energy-resolved pulse profiles of J1317, combining photons from all observations. panel V and VI: Phase-resolved hardness ratio profiles. panel VII: Phase evolution in mean surface temperature. for varying energy bands, computed from the NICER and EPIC pn observations. To account for the substantial background contamination in the NICER data ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: XMM-Newton and NICER X-ray spectra along with the three models presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Spin period versus spin-down diagram showing the location of J1317 relative to INSs listed in the ATNF pulsar catalogue (Manchester et al. 2005). J1317’s dipolar magnetic field strength is consistent within two sigma with the magnetic field inferred from the broad abs…

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Thermal luminosity as a function of spin-down luminosity for different INSs (Potekhin et al. 2020). The location of J1317 is marked by the black box. The spin-down luminosity is derived from the timing properties (see notes of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

[1]

1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

Appenzeller, I., Fricke, K., Fürtig, W., et al. 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

1998
[2]

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

1996
[3]

2024, Astroparticle Physics, 158, 102935 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

Ascenzi, S., Graber, V ., & Rea, N. 2024, Astroparticle Physics, 158, 102935 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

2024
[4]

2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol

Becker, W. 2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 357, Astro- physics and Space Science Library, ed. W. Becker, 91

2009
[5]

Bogdanov, S. & Ho, W. C. G. 2024, ApJ, 969, 53

2024
[6]

& Gourgoulhon, E

Bonazzola, S. & Gourgoulhon, E. 1996, A&A, 312, 675

1996
[7]

2017, MNRAS, 468, 2975

Borghese, A., Rea, N., Coti Zelati, F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 2975

2017
[8]

2019, PASP, 131, 108005

Buchner, J. 2019, PASP, 131, 108005

2019

Show all 49 references

[9]

2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001

Buchner, J. 2021, The Journal of Open Source Software, 6, 3001

2021
[10]

2014, A&A, 564, A125 De Grandis, D., Rigoselli, M., Mereghetti, S., et al

Buchner, J., Georgakakis, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A125 De Grandis, D., Rigoselli, M., Mereghetti, S., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4932 De Luca, A. 2017, in Journal of Physics Conference Series, V ol. 932, Journal of Physics Conference Series, 012006

2014
[11]

W., & Safdi, B

Dessert, C., Foster, J. W., & Safdi, B. R. 2020, ApJ, 904, 42

2020
[12]

2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03127

Doroshenko, V . 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.03127

2024
[13]

2019, Reports on Progress in Physics, 82, 106901 Ertan, Ü., Çalı¸ skan, ¸ S., Benli, O., & Alpar, M

Enoto, T., Kisaka, S., & Shibata, S. 2019, Reports on Progress in Physics, 82, 106901 Ertan, Ü., Çalı¸ skan, ¸ S., Benli, O., & Alpar, M. A. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 1559 Gençali, A. A. & Ertan, Ü. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 1481

2019
[14]

C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P

Gendreau, K. C., Arzoumanian, Z., Adkins, P. W., et al. 2016, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, V ol. 9905, Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2016: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray, ed. J.-W. A. den Herder, T. Takahashi, & M. Bautz, 99051H

2016
[15]

& Reisenegger, A

Gonzalez, D. & Reisenegger, A. 2010, A&A, 522, A16

2010
[16]

Gregory, P. C. & Loredo, T. J. 1996, ApJ, 473, 1059

1996
[17]

2007, Ap&SS, 308, 181

Haberl, F. 2007, Ap&SS, 308, 181

2007
[18]

D., Hambaryan, V ., Hasinger, G., & Motch, C

Haberl, F., Schwope, A. D., Hambaryan, V ., Hasinger, G., & Motch, C. 2003, A&A, 403, L19

2003
[19]

D., et al

Hambaryan, V ., Suleimanov, V ., Schwope, A. D., et al. 2011, A&A, 534, A74 HI4PI Collaboration, Ben Bekhti, N., Flöer, L., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A116

2011
[20]

Ho, W. C. G., Kaplan, D. L., Chang, P., van Adelsberg, M., & Potekhin, A. Y . 2007, MNRAS, 375, 821

2007
[21]

M., Haberl, F., Vink, J., et al

Hohle, M. M., Haberl, F., Vink, J., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 423, 1194

2012
[22]

2001, A&A, 365, L1

Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L1

2001
[23]

Kaspi, V . M. & Beloborodov, A. M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 261

2017
[24]

Keane, E. F. & Kramer, M. 2008, MNRAS, 391, 2009

2008
[25]

I., McLaughlin, M

Kondratiev, V . I., McLaughlin, M. A., Lorimer, D. R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 702, 692

2009
[26]

M., Schwope, A

Kurpas, J., Pires, A. M., Schwope, A. D., et al. 2026, A&A, 705, A148

2026
[27]

M., Schwope, A

Kurpas, J., Pires, A. M., Schwope, A. D., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A160

2025
[28]

D., Pires, A

Kurpas, J., Schwope, A. D., Pires, A. M., & Haberl, F. 2024, A&A, 683, A164

2024
[29]

D., Pires, A

Kurpas, J., Schwope, A. D., Pires, A. M., Haberl, F., & Buckley, D. A. H. 2023, A&A, 674, A155

2023
[30]

N., Hobbs, G

Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993

2005
[31]

2024, A&A, 682, A34

Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34

2024
[32]

Michel, F. C. & Tucker, W. H. 1969, Nature, 223, 277

1969
[33]

Ng, C. Y . & Kaspi, V . M. 2011, in American Institute of Physics Conference Se- ries, V ol. 1379, AstroPhysics of Neutron Stars 2010: A Conference in Honor of M. Ali Alpar, ed. E. Gö˘gü¸ s, T. Belloni, & Ü. Ertan, 60–69

2011
[34]

Ostriker, J. P. & Gunn, J. E. 1969, ApJ, 157, 1395

1969
[35]

J., Lindblom, L., Cutler, C., et al

Owen, B. J., Lindblom, L., Cutler, C., et al. 1998, Phys. Rev. D, 58, 084020 Özel, F. & Freire, P. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 401

1998
[36]

G., Abramkin, V ., & Posselt, B

Pavlov, G. G., Abramkin, V ., & Posselt, B. 2026, ApJ, 996, 79

2026
[37]

A., & Rea, N

Perna, R., Viganò, D., Pons, J. A., & Rea, N. 2013, MNRAS, 434, 2362

2013
[38]

M., Schwope, A., & Kurpas, J

Pires, A. M., Schwope, A., & Kurpas, J. 2023, IAU Symposium, 363, 288

2023
[39]

B., Haberl, F., et al

Posselt, B., Popov, S. B., Haberl, F., et al. 2007, Ap&SS, 308, 171

2007
[40]

Y ., Zyuzin, D

Potekhin, A. Y ., Zyuzin, D. A., Yakovlev, D. G., Beznogov, M. V ., & Shibanov, Y . A. 2020, MNRAS, 496, 5052

2020
[41]

2021, A&A, 647, A1

Predehl, P., Andritschke, R., Arefiev, V ., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A1

2021
[42]

2019, A&A, 627, A69

Rigoselli, M., Mereghetti, S., Suleimanov, V ., et al. 2019, A&A, 627, A69

2019
[43]

D., Hambaryan, V ., Haberl, F., & Motch, C

Schwope, A. D., Hambaryan, V ., Haberl, F., & Motch, C. 2005, A&A, 441, 597 Strüder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18

2005
[44]

M., & Maciejewski, G

Tetzlaff, N., Neuhäuser, R., Hohle, M. M., & Maciejewski, G. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 2369

2010
[45]

Turner, M. J. L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L27

2001
[46]

2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol

Turolla, R. 2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 357, Astro- physics and Space Science Library, ed. W. Becker, 141 van Kerkwijk, M. H. & Kaplan, D. L. 2007, Ap&SS, 308, 191 Viganò, D., Perna, R., Rea, N., & Pons, J. A. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 31 Viganò, D., Rea, N....

2009
[47]

2000, ApJ, 542, 914

Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914

2000
[48]

2019, PASJ, 71, 17

Yoneyama, T., Hayashida, K., Nakajima, H., & Matsumoto, H. 2019, PASJ, 71, 17

2019
[49]

& Turolla, R

Zane, S. & Turolla, R. 2006, MNRAS, 366, 727 Article number, page 9 of 10 A&A proofs:manuscript no. aa59673-26 Appendix A: Times-of-arrival measurements To conduct the timing searches and make best-use of theNICER observing pattern, consisting of multiple individual short expo...

2006

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

Appenzeller, I., Fricke, K., Fürtig, W., et al. 1998, The Messenger, 94, 1

1998

[2] [2]

Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

1996

[3] [3]

2024, Astroparticle Physics, 158, 102935 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A

Ascenzi, S., Graber, V ., & Rea, N. 2024, Astroparticle Physics, 158, 102935 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim, P. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 167 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33

2024

[4] [4]

2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol

Becker, W. 2009, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, V ol. 357, Astro- physics and Space Science Library, ed. W. Becker, 91

2009

[5] [5]

Bogdanov, S. & Ho, W. C. G. 2024, ApJ, 969, 53

2024

[6] [6]

& Gourgoulhon, E

Bonazzola, S. & Gourgoulhon, E. 1996, A&A, 312, 675

1996

[7] [7]

2017, MNRAS, 468, 2975

Borghese, A., Rea, N., Coti Zelati, F., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 468, 2975

2017

[8] [8]

2019, PASP, 131, 108005

Buchner, J. 2019, PASP, 131, 108005

2019