pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.11544 · v1 · pith:CARPC4LOnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Long thermonuclear burst driven thermal-viscous instability of accretion disk: triggering an outburst-like X-ray flare

Wenhui Yu , Zhaosheng Li , Yuanyue Pan , Yanan Wang , Erlin Qiao This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 09:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords thermonuclear burstaccretion diskthermal-viscous instabilityX-ray flareneutron star binaryheating frontdisk irradiation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A long thermonuclear burst can irradiate its accretion disk and launch a heating front that temporarily raises the mass accretion rate.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents NICER and MAXI data on a long X-ray burst from the neutron star binary MAXI J0911-655, followed one day later by an unexpected flare that brightened the persistent emission and softened its spectrum. The authors interpret the flare as the result of the burst's intense radiation heating the disk, which was already near the threshold for thermal-viscous instability. This extra heat launched an inside-out heating front that increased the accretion rate for a limited time before the system returned to its prior low state. The timescales and energy scales match expectations for burst-driven disk modulation, supplying direct evidence that a thermonuclear event can alter the accretion flow around the neutron star.

Core claim

The long burst, with fluence 1.1e-4 erg cm^-2 and decay time ~43 min, delivered enough irradiation to amplify the ongoing thermal-viscous accretion process in a disk accreting at ~1% Eddington. The added heat drove an inside-out heating front that raised the persistent 0.5-10 keV flux from 0.27e-9 to 1.4e-9 erg cm^-2 s^-1 and changed the photon index from ~1.7 to ~2.2, after which the source returned to its baseline low/hard state.

What carries the argument

The inside-out heating front triggered when burst irradiation pushes a marginally stable disk across the thermal-viscous instability threshold.

If this is right

  • The burst can modulate accretion on a one-day timescale even when the disk is accreting at only one percent of Eddington.
  • The flare's spectral softening follows the expected change when a heating front moves outward through the disk.
  • Similar long bursts in other low-accretion-rate systems should produce observable post-burst flares if the disk is near the instability threshold.
  • The total energy released in the burst (~1.2e42 erg) is sufficient to supply the extra heat needed to launch the front.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If confirmed in additional sources, burst-triggered flares could be used to map the radial structure of disks at low accretion rates.
  • Models of disk stability may need to include the transient heat input from bursts as a standard perturbation term.

Load-bearing premise

The flare is caused by the burst's irradiation rather than an unrelated change in the accretion flow.

What would settle it

A detailed disk-instability model calculation that uses the measured burst fluence and pre-burst accretion rate but predicts no flare with the observed delay, amplitude, and spectral evolution would falsify the causal link.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.11544 by Erlin Qiao, Wenhui Yu, Yanan Wang, Yuanyue Pan, Zhaosheng Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Light curves of MAXI J0911–655 from MAXI and NICER observations. We show the NICER light curve (64 s, 0.5–10 keV, black, red and green points) and the MAXI light curve (one day averaged, 2–20 keV, gray points), where the red and green points represent the NICER data of long X-ray burst and outburst-like flare, respectively. The vertical red dashed lines on MJD 58991.7101, 59782.1030 and 60188.5488 represen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: CCD (Top panel) and HID (Bottom panel) of MAXI J0911–655 from the NICER observations. The red, green and black crosses represent the data observed in burst, outburst-like flare and outburst-like flare tail, respectively. Each point represents a segment of 64 s. The HID and CCD of the normal outburst observed in 2019 and between 2021- 2023 and marked are shown as gray. We performed the time-resolved burst s… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The time-resolved spectroscopy of the long burst and outburst-like flare observed by MAXI and NICER. From top to bottom, we show the bolometric flux of blackbody, Fbb; the blackbody temperature, kTbb, the blackbody ra￾dius, Rbb, which were calculated at a distance of 9.45 kpc; the power-law index, Γ, the bolometric flux of power-law, Fpow; and the goodness of fit per degree of freedom, χ 2 ν. Blue diamonds… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The absorbed best-fit spectra and the resid￾uals in 0.5–10 keV obtained by fitted with the model Tbabs*(bbodyrad+powerlaw). From top to bottom: each spectrum from regions A–D with the best-fit models (solid lines), the blackbody component, the powerlaw component, and residuals of the best-fit models to the spectra, respec￾tively. The blackbody component are insignificant in the spectra from region D (outbu… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The best-fitted burst decay flux by the model from Cumming & Macbeth (2004). We use the trigger time of MAXI as the burst peak time. The red points represent the data from MAXI. During the cooling of the long burst, we adopted a power-law component to describe the persistent emis￾sion. Initially, the NICER spectra showed a low power￾law photon index ∼ 1.5, and a rapidly decaying flux. The power-law flux de… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic diagram of the burst-triggered disk instability. Left: Thermal equilibrium S-curves for the accretion disk, illustrating effective temperature (Teff ) versus local disk mass. The solid, dashed, and dash-dotted lines represent increasing values of the irradiation parameter, C. Prior to the flare, the disk is already in an active, hot state on the upper branch, corresponding to the source’s persist… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relations of power-law flux vs. the index Γ. The arrow indicates the direction of evolution. Red arrow: burst rise phase, the source evolves from a low/hard state (low flux, hard spectrum) to a high/soft state (high flux, soft spectrum). Grey arrow: outburst decay phase, the source returns from the high/soft state to the low/hard state (flux declines, spectrum hardens). The complete cycle illustrates the t… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report on NICER and MAXI observations of a long-duration thermonuclear X-ray burst and a subsequent outburst-like X-ray flare from the neutron star low-mass X-ray binary MAXI J0911--655. Prior to the burst, the source was in a persistent low/hard state with a power-law-dominated spectrum ($\Gamma \sim 1.7$) and a mass accretion rate of $\sim 1\%$ of the Eddington limit. The long burst, detected by MAXI on 2020 May 22 (MJD 58991.7101), was rapidly followed up by NICER. From time-resolved spectroscopy of the cooling tail, we estimate an exponential decay time of $\approx43$ minutes, the ignition column depth of $\approx0.1\times 10^{12}~{\rm g ~cm^{-2}}$, the burst fluence of $\approx 1.1\times 10^{-4}~{\rm erg~cm^{-2}}$, and the total energy release of $\approx1.2\times10^{42}$ erg. Approximately one day after the burst onset, the 0.5-10 keV light curve unexpectedly re-brightened, initiating an outburst-like flare. During the peak of this flare, the persistent power-law flux increased from its pre-burst level of $\sim0.27\times10^{-9}~{\rm erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$ to $1.4\times10^{-9}~{\rm erg~cm^{-2}~s^{-1}}$. This flux enhancement was accompanied by significant spectral softening, with the photon index increasing to $\Gamma \sim 2.2$. Subsequently, the flux decayed and the source returned to its baseline low/hard state. The observed timescales and energetics suggest that intense irradiation from the long burst amplified the ongoing thermal-viscous accretion process. This heating drove an inside-out heating front that temporarily enhanced the mass accretion rate, providing compelling observational evidence of a thermonuclear burst directly modulating the accretion dynamics of its surrounding disk.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper reports NICER and MAXI observations of a long thermonuclear X-ray burst from MAXI J0911-655 in the low/hard state at ~1% Eddington, with measured decay time ~43 min, ignition depth ~0.1e12 g cm^-2, fluence ~1.1e-4 erg cm^-2, and total energy ~1.2e42 erg. Approximately one day later, the 0.5-10 keV flux rose from ~0.27e-9 to 1.4e-9 erg cm^-2 s^-1 with spectral softening (Gamma from 1.7 to 2.2), followed by decay back to baseline. The authors interpret the flare as burst irradiation triggering an inside-out heating front that enhances accretion via thermal-viscous instability.

Significance. If the causal mechanism is substantiated, the result would supply rare direct observational evidence that a thermonuclear burst can modulate accretion-disk dynamics through irradiation-driven thermal-viscous instability, with implications for disk stability thresholds in NS LMXBs at low accretion rates.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central causal claim that the ~1-day flare results from burst irradiation launching a heating front rests on qualitative timescale and energetics matching without quantitative support; no estimate is given of the irradiation temperature profile, the radial trigger location, or the expected viscous/thermal timescale at that radius for a 1% Eddington disk.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): alternative explanations such as unrelated accretion-rate fluctuations are not addressed or excluded, leaving the attribution to burst-driven instability as an untested assumption rather than a demonstrated conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central causal claim that the ~1-day flare results from burst irradiation launching a heating front rests on qualitative timescale and energetics matching without quantitative support; no estimate is given of the irradiation temperature profile, the radial trigger location, or the expected viscous/thermal timescale at that radius for a 1% Eddington disk.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript provides only qualitative support via timescale and energetics matching and does not include quantitative estimates of the irradiation temperature profile, trigger radius, or local viscous/thermal timescales. The work is observational in focus, and such modeling would require additional assumptions about disk viscosity, opacity, and structure that are not constrained by the NICER/MAXI data. We will revise the abstract to describe the interpretation as suggestive rather than definitive and add a note in the discussion section acknowledging this limitation and the value of future theoretical work. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): alternative explanations such as unrelated accretion-rate fluctuations are not addressed or excluded, leaving the attribution to burst-driven instability as an untested assumption rather than a demonstrated conclusion.

    Authors: We accept that alternative explanations were not explicitly discussed. In the revised manuscript we will add a short paragraph in the discussion addressing the possibility of unrelated accretion-rate fluctuations, while noting that the precise one-day delay after the burst and the accompanying spectral softening (Gamma increasing from 1.7 to 2.2) make a causal link more plausible than a random coincidence. We will also moderate the abstract language to present the burst-driven instability as an interpretation supported by the observations rather than a conclusively demonstrated mechanism. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Provision of quantitative estimates for the irradiation temperature profile, radial trigger location, and expected viscous/thermal timescales, as these require new theoretical disk modeling outside the scope of the current observational paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational interpretation of measured fluxes and timescales

full rationale

The paper reports direct NICER/MAXI observations of a long thermonuclear burst (decay time ~43 min, fluence ~1.1e-4 erg cm^-2, energy ~1.2e42 erg) followed ~1 day later by a re-brightening flare with increased power-law flux and spectral softening. The central claim is an interpretive suggestion that burst irradiation amplified thermal-viscous instability, based on the observed temporal sequence and energetics. No equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains appear in the provided text; the result does not reduce to its inputs by construction. The analysis is self-contained against external benchmarks of measured quantities.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into parameters; the interpretation assumes the standard thermal-viscous disk instability model from prior literature applies directly to this source after burst heating.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Thermal-viscous instability in accretion disks can be triggered by external irradiation from a thermonuclear burst when the disk is near the stability threshold
    Invoked in the final paragraph to link the burst to the observed flare.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5929 in / 1300 out tokens · 20297 ms · 2026-06-27T09:13:48.788067+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    2023, , 521, 3608, 10.1093/mnras/stad374

    Alizai , K., Chenevez , J., Cumming , A., et al. 2023, , 521, 3608, 10.1093/mnras/stad374

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad374 2023

  2. [2]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    R., & Everett , J

    Ballantyne , D. R., & Everett , J. E. 2005, , 626, 364, 10.1086/429860

    work page doi:10.1086/429860 2005

  4. [4]

    arXiv , author =:1812.10684 , journal =

    Bilous , A. V., & Watts , A. L. 2019, , 245, 19, 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2fe1

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab2fe1 2019

  5. [5]

    F., et al

    Buccheri , R., Bennett , K., Bignami , G. F., et al. 1983, , 128, 245

    1983

  6. [6]

    2021, , 920, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac18c4

    Bult , P., Altamirano , D., Arzoumanian , Z., et al. 2021, , 920, 59, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac18c4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac18c4 2021

  7. [7]

    M., Arzoumanian , Z., & Gendreau , K

    Bult , P. M., Arzoumanian , Z., & Gendreau , K. C. 2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13760, 1

    2020

  8. [8]

    M., Gendreau , K

    Bult , P. M., Gendreau , K. C., Strohmayer , T. E., et al. 2019, The Astronomer's Telegram, 12869, 1

    2019

  9. [9]

    O . F., & Ertan , \

    C oban , \"O . F., & Ertan , \"U . 2024, , 961, 252, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1515

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad1515 2024

  10. [10]

    P., Zhang , S., Qu , J

    Chen , Y. P., Zhang , S., Qu , J. L., et al. 2018, , 864, L30, 10.3847/2041-8213/aadc0e

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aadc0e 2018

  11. [11]

    2001, , 559, L127, 10.1086/323937

    Cumming , A., & Bildsten , L. 2001, , 559, L127, 10.1086/323937

    work page doi:10.1086/323937 2001

  12. [12]

    2004, , 603, L37, 10.1086/382873

    Cumming , A., & Macbeth , J. 2004, , 603, L37, 10.1086/382873

    work page doi:10.1086/382873 2004

  13. [13]

    Cumming , A., Macbeth , J., in 't Zand , J. J. M., & Page , D. 2006, , 646, 429, 10.1086/504698

    work page doi:10.1086/504698 2006

  14. [14]

    R., Belloni , T., et al

    Degenaar , N., Ballantyne , D. R., Belloni , T., et al. 2018, , 214, 15, 10.1007/s11214-017-0448-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11214-017-0448-3 2018

  15. [15]

    2001, A&A, 373, 251, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010632

    Dubus , G., Hameury , J. M., & Lasota , J. P. 2001, , 373, 251, 10.1051/0004-6361:20010632

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20010632 2001

  16. [16]

    Optical spectra of the central cluster galaxies

    Dubus , G., Lasota , J.-P., Hameury , J.-M., & Charles , P. 1999, , 303, 139, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02212.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02212.x 1999

  17. [17]

    Ertan , \"U ., & Alpar , M. A. 2002, , 393, 205, 10.1051/0004-6361:20020998

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20020998 2002

  18. [18]

    2008, , 484, 43, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078982

    Falanga , M., Chenevez , J., Cumming , A., et al. 2008, , 484, 43, 10.1051/0004-6361:20078982

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20078982 2008

  19. [19]

    C., Ballantyne , D

    Fragile , P. C., Ballantyne , D. R., & Blankenship , A. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 541, 10.1038/s41550-019-0987-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0987-5 2020

  20. [20]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 980, 161, 10.3847/1538-4357/adadee

    Fu, T., Li, Z., Pan, Y., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 980, 161, 10.3847/1538-4357/adadee

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adadee 2025

  21. [21]

    K., & Keek , L

    Galloway , D. K., & Keek , L. 2021, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, 461, 209, 10.1007/978-3-662-62110-3\_5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-62110-3 2021

  22. [22]

    K., Muno, M

    Galloway, D. K., Muno, M. P., Hartman, J. M., Psaltis, D., & Chakrabarty, D. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 179, 360

    2008

  23. [23]

    2008 , Bdsk-Url-1 =

    Galloway , D. K., Muno , M. P., Hartman , J. M., Psaltis , D., & Chakrabarty , D. 2008, , 179, 360, 10.1086/592044

    work page doi:10.1086/592044 2008

  24. [24]

    Hameury , keywords =

    Hameury, J. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1004, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.022

    work page doi:10.1016/j.asr.2019.10.022 2020

  25. [25]

    O., & Degenaar , N

    Heinke , C. O., & Degenaar , N. 2023, The Astronomer's Telegram, 16358, 1

    2023

  26. [26]

    L., et al

    Huppenkothen , D., Bachetti , M., Stevens , A. L., et al. 2019, , 881, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab258d 2019

  27. [27]

    2017, in 7 years of MAXI: monitoring X-ray Transients, ed

    in't Zand , J. 2017, in 7 years of MAXI: monitoring X-ray Transients, ed. M. Serino , M. Shidatsu , W. Iwakiri , & T. Mihara , 121. 1702.04899

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  28. [28]

    in't Zand , J. J. M., Galloway , D. K., & Ballantyne , D. R. 2011, , 525, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/201015556

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015556 2011

  29. [30]

    2019 b , , 621, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834270

    ---. 2019 b , , 621, A53, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834270

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834270 2019

  30. [31]

    K., in't Zand , J

    Keek , L., Galloway , D. K., in't Zand , J. J. M., & Heger , A. 2010, , 718, 292, 10.1088/0004-637X/718/1/292

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/718/1/292 2010

  31. [32]

    Keek , L., Heger , A., & in't Zand , J. J. M. 2012, , 752, 150, 10.1088/0004-637X/752/2/150

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/752/2/150 2012

  32. [33]

    Kuulkers , E., in't Zand , J. J. M., & Lasota , J. P. 2009, , 503, 889, 10.1051/0004-6361/200810981

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200810981 2009

  33. [34]

    Kuulkers , E., in't Zand , J. J. M., Atteia , J. L., et al. 2010, , 514, A65, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913210

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913210 2010

  34. [35]

    2001, , 45, 449, 10.1016/S1387-6473(01)00112-9

    Lasota , J.-P. 2001, , 45, 449, 10.1016/S1387-6473(01)00112-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s1387-6473(01)00112-9 2001

  35. [36]

    P., Dubus , G., & Kruk , K

    Lasota , J. P., Dubus , G., & Kruk , K. 2008, , 486, 523, 10.1051/0004-6361:200809658

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:200809658 2008

  36. [37]

    H., Van Paradijs, J., & Taam, R

    Lewin, W. H., Van Paradijs, J., & Taam, R. E. 1993, Space Science Reviews, 62, 223

    1993

  37. [38]

    Lewin , W. H. G., van Paradijs , J., & Taam , R. E. 1993, , 62, 223, 10.1007/BF00196124

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00196124 1993

  38. [39]

    2021, , 920, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1f15

    Li , Z., Pan , Y., & Falanga , M. 2021, , 920, 35, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1f15

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac1f15 2021

  39. [40]

    F., Poutanen , J., et al

    Li , Z., Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., et al. 2018, , 866, 53, 10.3847/1538-4357/aade8e

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aade8e 2018

  40. [41]

    Lipunova, G. V. 2015, The Astrophysical Journal, 804, 87, 10.1088/0004-637X/804/2/87

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/804/2/87 2015

  41. [42]

    2024, , 969, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d86

    Lu , Y., Li , Z., Yu , W., Pan , Y., & Falanga , M. 2024, , 969, 15, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d86

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad4d86 2024

  42. [43]

    2023, , 670, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244984

    Lu , Y., Li , Z., Pan , Y., et al. 2023, , 670, A87, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244984

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244984 2023

  43. [44]

    J., & Coppi , P

    Maccarone , T. J., & Coppi , P. S. 2003, , 399, 1151, 10.1051/0004-6361:20021881

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20021881 2003

  44. [45]

    2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13754, 1

    Nakajima , M., Sugita , S., Serino , M., et al. 2020, The Astronomer's Telegram, 13754, 1

    2020

  45. [46]

    M., Strohmayer , T

    Ng , M., Bult , P. M., Strohmayer , T. E., et al. 2021, The Astronomer's Telegram, 14767, 1

    2021

  46. [47]

    R., Paresce , F., & De Marchi , G

    Paltrinieri , B., Ferraro , F. R., Paresce , F., & De Marchi , G. 2001, , 121, 3114, 10.1086/321069

    work page doi:10.1086/321069 2001

  47. [48]

    2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 982, 18, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb726

    Peng, Z., Li, Z., Pan, Y., et al. 2025, The Astrophysical Journal, 982, 18, 10.3847/1538-4357/adb726

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adb726 2025

  48. [49]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed

    Psaltis , D. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, ed. W. H. G. Lewin & M. van der Klis , Vol. 39, 1--38

    2006

  49. [50]

    A., Loewenstein , M., Steiner , J

    Remillard , R. A., Loewenstein , M., Steiner , J. F., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2105.09901. 2105.09901

    arXiv 2021

  50. [51]

    D., Degenaar , N., van den Eijnden , J., et al

    Russell , T. D., Degenaar , N., van den Eijnden , J., et al. 2024, , 627, 763, 10.1038/s41586-024-07133-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07133-5 2024

  51. [52]

    2017, , 598, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629406

    Sanna , A., Papitto , A., Burderi , L., et al. 2017, , 598, A34, 10.1051/0004-6361/201629406

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629406 2017

  52. [53]

    2012, , 64, 91, 10.1093/pasj/64.5.91

    Serino , M., Mihara , T., Matsuoka , M., et al. 2012, , 64, 91, 10.1093/pasj/64.5.91

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/64.5.91 2012

  53. [54]

    2016, The Astronomer's Telegram, 8872, 1

    Serino , M., Tanaka , K., Negoro , H., et al. 2016, The Astronomer's Telegram, 8872, 1

    2016

  54. [55]

    R., & Fragile , P

    Speicher , J., Ballantyne , D. R., & Fragile , P. C. 2024, , 976, 44, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad863d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad863d 2024

  55. [56]

    R., & Malzac , J

    Speicher , J., Ballantyne , D. R., & Malzac , J. 2020, , 499, 4479, 10.1093/mnras/staa3137

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3137 2020

  56. [57]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, No

    Strohmayer , T., & Bildsten , L. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, Cambridge Astrophysics Series, No. 39, ed. W. Lewin & M. van der Klis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 113--156

    2006

  57. [58]

    E., & Brown , E

    Strohmayer , T. E., & Brown , E. F. 2002, , 566, 1045, 10.1086/338337

    work page doi:10.1086/338337 2002

  58. [59]

    a ttil \

    Suleimanov , V. F., Poutanen , J., N \"a ttil \"a , J., et al. 2017, , 466, 906, 10.1093/mnras/stw3132

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3132 2017

  59. [60]

    L., van der Marel , R

    Watkins , L. L., van der Marel , R. P., Bellini , A., & Anderson , J. 2015, , 812, 149, 10.1088/0004-637X/812/2/149

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/812/2/149 2015

  60. [61]

    On the Absorption of X-rays in the Interstellar Medium

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, The Astrophysical Journal, 542, 914, 10.1086/317016

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/317016 2000

  61. [62]

    S., Titarchuk, L., Ray, P

    Wood, K. S., Titarchuk, L., Ray, P. S., et al. 2001, The Astrophysical Journal, 563, 246, 10.1086/323768

    work page doi:10.1086/323768 2001

  62. [63]

    2024, , 683, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348195

    Yu , W., Li , Z., Lu , Y., et al. 2024, , 683, A93, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348195

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348195 2024

  63. [64]

    2025, , 696, A139, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453142

    Yu , W., Li , Z., Pan , Y., et al. 2025, , 696, A139, 10.1051/0004-6361/202453142

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202453142 2025

  64. [65]

    2022, , 660, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142801

    Zhao , G., Li , Z., Pan , Y., et al. 2022, , 660, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142801

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142801 2022