pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12049 · v1 · pith:RF44B5CXnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · cond-mat.quant-gas

Searching for cosmic vortices

Marek Niko{\l}ajuk , Tomasz Karpiuk , Miros{\l}aw Brewczyk This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE cond-mat.quant-gas
keywords white dwarfblack holeaccretion discquantized vorticestidal disruptiongravitational waveselectromagnetic radiationBose-Fermi droplet
0
0 comments X

The pith

A white dwarf passing a black hole forms an accretion disc with quantized vortices that produce flickering electromagnetic signals on few-second timescales while the receding star emits gravitational waves.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models the strong tidal disruption of a cold helium white dwarf by a black hole, treating the star as a Bose-Fermi droplet evolved with quantum hydrodynamic equations. At periastron the white dwarf loses substantial mass that falls onto the black hole and forms an accretion disc. Quantized vortices appear in that disc and generate strong electromagnetic radiation whose intensity flickers with a characteristic pattern that changes every few seconds. After the encounter the white dwarf continues outward; vortices on its surface stretch its shape, forcing rotation and the emission of gravitational waves. The model therefore predicts linked electromagnetic and gravitational signatures that could be searched for in observations of such events.

Core claim

The paper claims that modeling the white dwarf as a Bose-Fermi droplet and evolving the system with quantum hydrodynamic equations shows that mass loss at periastron creates an accretion disc with quantized vortices. These vortices manifest as strong electromagnetic radiation signals exhibiting characteristic flickering patterns on a timescale of a few seconds. As the white dwarf recedes, vortices along its surface elongate its geometry, causing it to rotate and emit gravitational waves.

What carries the argument

Quantized vortices that form both in the accretion disc around the black hole and along the surface of the receding white dwarf, obtained from the quantum hydrodynamic evolution of the Bose-Fermi droplet model.

If this is right

  • The accretion disc produces strong electromagnetic radiation with flickering patterns changing on a timescale of a few seconds.
  • Vortices on the white dwarf surface elongate its geometry, causing rotation and gravitational wave emission as the star recedes.
  • The white dwarf moves away from the black hole while carrying surface vortices that sustain the elongated rotating shape.
  • These electromagnetic and gravitational signals arise directly from the mass lost during the periastron passage.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Electromagnetic surveys could search for the predicted few-second flickering in X-ray or optical data from white-dwarf disruption candidates.
  • Gravitational-wave detectors might record the emission if the vortex-driven elongation is large enough.
  • The same quantum-hydrodynamic treatment might be applied to other compact-object encounters to test whether vortices appear under different mass or composition conditions.
  • Detection of both the flickering and the gravitational waves from one event would link the disc and stellar-surface vortex populations.

Load-bearing premise

The white dwarf can be accurately modeled as a Bose-Fermi droplet whose evolution is captured by quantum hydrodynamic equations, and that mass loss during periastron passage forms an accretion disc containing quantized vortices whose electromagnetic and gravitational signatures follow directly from that model.

What would settle it

Absence of electromagnetic flickering signals varying on timescales of a few seconds in observations of candidate white-dwarf tidal disruption events near black holes, or lack of associated gravitational-wave emission from the departing white dwarf.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12049 by Marek Niko{\l}ajuk, Miros{\l}aw Brewczyk, Tomasz Karpiuk.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Bosonic density (left column) and quantum phase (right column) at the z = 0 plane for different time instants. The density and time are in units of 1/a3 B and mBa 2 B/ℏ, re￾spectively. The positions of the positive and negative quan￾tized vortices are marked by red/yellow plus signs and blue minus signs, respectively. Initially, there are no vortices asso￾ciated with the white dwarf (top frame), although m… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ratio P B dip/P F dip (in red) and the maximum co￾variance (in blue) are plotted as a function of time. The red spikes representing the ratio clearly correlate with time intervals of high covariance. maximum value of the modulus of covariance over the grid of spatial plaquettes is plotted in blue. Most of the spikes in the ratio P B dip/P F dip are correlated with time intervals of high covariance. This su… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: after time 5000, when the first vortices enter the accretion disc and the initial matter falling around the black hole hits the spout of matter that is still strength￾ening the accretion disc (see the movie at Niko lajuk et al. (2026a)). Later, however, a multitude of peaks appear in the spectrum, clearly demonstrating the complexity of the accretion disc’s dynamics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Electromagnetic dipole radiation power coming from a region with a radius of 700 aB (blue curve) and orig￾inating from the ten most powerful plaquettes with vortices (red curve) as a function of time. To strengthen the role of vortices in generating elec￾tromagnetic radiation further, we calculate the power of dipole radiation originating from the ten most en￾ergetic plaquettes containing vortices. The res… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Power spectrum density of the radiation coming from the accretion disc is shown as a function of frequency (f). P SD ∼ 1/f (solid red line) exhibits flicker noise when the preformation period is included in the analysis, followed by a white noise tail at the highest frequencies (top frame). However, when examining radiation from a well-formed ac￾cretion disc, the P SD changes qualitatively to P SD ∼ 1/f 2 … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Second moments of the mass density (Mij , with i, j = x, y) of an escaping white dwarf are shown as a func￾tion of time. Only times after the white dwarf has clearly departed the black hole and accretion disc are considered. The curves depict Mxx (red), Myy (blue), and Mxy (green) moments. Note that the Mxy moment has been shifted so that it overlaps with two other moments. Clearly, a rotating white dwarf … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Our study focuses on the strong tidal disruption of a cold helium white dwarf passing a black hole. We model the white dwarf as a Bose-Fermi droplet and use quantum hydrodynamic equations to simulate the binary system's evolution. As the white dwarf passes through periastron, it loses a significant amount of mass. This mass falls onto the black hole and forms an accretion disc. Quantized vortices appear in the accretion disc, manifesting as strong electromagnetic radiation signals that exhibit characteristic flickering patterns changing on a timescale of a few seconds. Meanwhile, the white dwarf moves away from the black hole. As the white dwarf moves through space, vortices run along its surface. This elongates its geometry, causing it to rotate and emit gravitational waves.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that modeling a cold helium white dwarf as a Bose-Fermi droplet with quantum hydrodynamic equations during strong tidal disruption by a black hole leads to mass loss forming an accretion disc containing quantized vortices. These vortices produce strong electromagnetic radiation with characteristic flickering on timescales of a few seconds. The remaining white dwarf develops surface vortices that elongate its geometry, induce rotation, and generate gravitational waves.

Significance. If the modeling assumptions were shown to hold, the work would propose novel multi-messenger signatures (EM flickering plus GWs) from white-dwarf tidal disruptions that link quantum hydrodynamics to observable astrophysical signals. The approach is conceptually distinctive in applying a Bose-Fermi droplet description to a compact object, but the absence of validation, parameter choices, or comparison to standard TDE treatments limits its immediate significance.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and modeling description] Abstract and modeling description: the central claim that quantized vortices form in the post-periastron accretion disc and directly produce the reported EM flickering signals rests on the unexamined extension of the quantum hydrodynamic equations (used for the initial cold WD) to the stripped material. No derivation or citation establishes that this material remains a degenerate Bose-Fermi system once it forms a disc, in contrast to standard hot, ionized TDE disc models treated with MHD or hydrodynamics where quantized circulation is not expected.
  2. [Abstract and results on white-dwarf evolution] Abstract and results on white-dwarf evolution: the assertion that surface vortices elongate the white dwarf, cause rotation, and emit gravitational waves is presented without quantitative support (e.g., no equations for the elongation timescale, angular momentum transfer, or resulting GW strain), rendering the GW prediction unassessable and load-bearing for the multi-messenger claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract supplies no equations, simulation parameters, or validation checks, which hinders immediate evaluation of the quantitative claims even at a high level.
  2. Notation for the Bose-Fermi droplet and quantum hydrodynamic equations should be defined explicitly on first use to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed report and the opportunity to clarify our work. We address each major comment below, agreeing where additional justification is needed and outlining the planned revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and modeling description] Abstract and modeling description: the central claim that quantized vortices form in the post-periastron accretion disc and directly produce the reported EM flickering signals rests on the unexamined extension of the quantum hydrodynamic equations (used for the initial cold WD) to the stripped material. No derivation or citation establishes that this material remains a degenerate Bose-Fermi system once it forms a disc, in contrast to standard hot, ionized TDE disc models treated with MHD or hydrodynamics where quantized circulation is not expected.

    Authors: The manuscript applies the quantum hydrodynamic equations to the full binary evolution, including the mass stripped at periastron that forms the disc, under the assumption that the cold helium material retains sufficient degeneracy for quantized vortices to persist. We acknowledge that the current text does not include an explicit derivation or additional citations addressing the transition to disc conditions versus standard hot TDE models. In revision we will add a subsection on model assumptions, including estimates of post-stripping density and temperature regimes and references to prior work on quantum fluid descriptions in compact-object contexts, to make the extension explicit. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract and results on white-dwarf evolution] Abstract and results on white-dwarf evolution: the assertion that surface vortices elongate the white dwarf, cause rotation, and emit gravitational waves is presented without quantitative support (e.g., no equations for the elongation timescale, angular momentum transfer, or resulting GW strain), rendering the GW prediction unassessable and load-bearing for the multi-messenger claim.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the gravitational-wave claim currently rests on a qualitative description of surface vortices and elongation without accompanying equations or estimates. The simulation shows the geometric change and induced rotation, but quantitative details such as timescale, angular-momentum transfer, and strain are not provided. We will revise the relevant section to include order-of-magnitude calculations for the elongation timescale based on vortex motion, a simple angular-momentum estimate, and a quadrupole-formula strain estimate for the rotating elongated body. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: model application yields simulation outputs without definitional reduction

full rationale

The paper applies quantum hydrodynamic equations to a Bose-Fermi droplet model of the white dwarf and reports simulation outcomes for mass loss, disc formation, and vortex appearance. No equations, parameter fits, or self-citations are shown that define the target signatures (flickering EM signals or GW emission) directly in terms of the inputs. The claims follow from running the stated model rather than renaming or fitting the same quantities. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no equations or methods section, so free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be identified.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5651 in / 1163 out tokens · 28316 ms · 2026-06-27T08:47:05.199684+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 35 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    URL https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    Abbott, B. P., Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., et al. 2016, PhRvL, 116, 061102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  2. [2]

    G., C´ orsico, A

    Althaus, L. G., C´ orsico, A. H., Isern, J., & Garc´ ıa-Berro, E. 2010, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 18, 471

    2010

  3. [3]

    , keywords =

    Arcodia, R., Merloni, A., Nandra, K., et al. 2021, Nature, 592, 704, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6 Armas Padilla, M., Corral-Santana, J. M., Borghese, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A186, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346797

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03394-6 2021

  4. [4]

    A., Wheeler, J

    Ball, J. A., Wheeler, J. A., & Firemen, E. L. 1973, Reviews of Modern Physics, 45, 333, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.45.333

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.45.333 1973

  5. [5]

    Baynham, C. F. A., Hobson, R., Buchmueller, O., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.09158, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.09158

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.09158 2025

  6. [6]

    A., & Rokhsar, D

    Butts, D. A., & Rokhsar, D. S. 1999, Nature, 397, 327

    1999

  7. [7]

    2026, ApJ, 1000, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4876 C´ orsico, A

    Chakraborty, J., Masterson, M., Mummery, A., et al. 2026, ApJ, 1000, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae4876 C´ orsico, A. H., Althaus, L. G., Miller Bertolami, M. M., &

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae4876 2026

  8. [8]

    Kepler, S. O. 2019, Astron. Astrophys. Rev., 27, 7

    2019

  9. [9]

    , eprint =

    Czerny, B., Niko lajuk, M., Piasecki, M., & Kuraszkiewicz, J. 2001, MNRAS, 325, 865, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04522.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04522.x 2001

  10. [10]

    C., Bahramian, A., Naoz, S., et al

    Dage, K. C., Bahramian, A., Naoz, S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 1347, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae578

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae578 2024

  11. [11]

    J., Patel, K., Cai, G., & Chin, C

    DeSalvo, B. J., Patel, K., Cai, G., & Chin, C. 2019, Nature, 568, 61, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1055-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1055-0 2019

  12. [12]

    J., Patel, K., Johansen, J., & Chin, C

    DeSalvo, B. J., Patel, K., Johansen, J., & Chin, C. 2017, PhRvL, 119, 233401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.233401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.233401 2017

  13. [13]

    K., & Deb, B

    Dey, B. K., & Deb, B. M. 1998, Int. J. Quantum Chem., 70, 441

    1998

  14. [14]

    G., & Suraud, E

    Domps, A., Reinhard, P. G., & Suraud, E. 1998, PhRvL, 80, 5520, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5520

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5520 1998

  15. [15]

    1998, Astron

    Ergma, E., & Fedorova, A. 1998, Astron. Astrophys., 338, 69 Fr¨ olich, H. 1967, Physica, 37, 215

    1998

  16. [16]

    2009, JCAP, 2009, 017, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/017

    Gabadadze, G., & Pirtskhalava, D. 2009, JCAP, 2009, 017, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/017

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2009/05/017 2009

  17. [17]

    Gabadadze, G., & Rosen, R. A. 2008a, JCAP, 2008, 030, doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/030 —. 2008b, Physics Letters B, 658, 266, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2007.08.058

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/10/030 2008

  18. [18]

    2018, Int

    Brewczyk, M. 2018, Int. J. Comput. Math., 95, 2143

    2018

  19. [19]

    2021, MNRAS, 508, 3463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2818 Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ın, O., & Vaughan, S

    Georgakakis, A., Papadakis, I., & Paolillo, M. 2021, MNRAS, 508, 3463, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2818 Gonz´ alez-Mart´ ın, O., & Vaughan, S. 2012, A&A, 544, A80, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219008

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2818 2021

  20. [20]

    T., Karpiuk, T., Brewczyk, M., & Rz¸ a˙ zewski, K

    Grochowski, P. T., Karpiuk, T., Brewczyk, M., & Rz¸ a˙ zewski, K. 2017, PhRvL, 119, 215303, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.215303 —. 2020, PhRvL, 125, 103401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.103401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.215303 2017

  21. [21]

    A., Maksym, W

    Irwin, J. A., Maksym, W. P., Sivakoff, G. R., et al. 2016, Nature, 538, 356, doi: 10.1038/nature19822 10

    work page doi:10.1038/nature19822 2016

  22. [22]

    2020, New Journal of Physics, 22, 103025, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/abbcef

    Karpiuk, T., Gajda, M., & Brewczyk, M. 2020, New Journal of Physics, 22, 103025, doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/abbcef

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/abbcef 2020

  23. [23]

    2021, Scientific Reports, 11, 2286, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81707-5

    Karpiuk, T., Niko lajuk, M., Gajda, M., & Brewczyk, M. 2021, Scientific Reports, 11, 2286, doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81707-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-81707-5 2021

  24. [24]

    H., & Piran, T

    Krolik, J. H., & Piran, T. 2011, ApJ, 743, 134, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/134

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/743/2/134 2011

  25. [25]

    2025, Few-Body Syst., 66, 1

    Lippi, E., Gerken, M., H¨ afner, S., et al. 2025, Few-Body Syst., 66, 1

    2025

  26. [26]

    Astronomy and Astrophysics , author =

    Liu, Z., Malyali, A., Krumpe, M., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A75, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244805

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244805 2023

  27. [27]

    1927, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 40, 322, doi: 10.1007/BF01400372

    Madelung, E. 1927, Zeitschrift fur Physik, 40, 322, doi: 10.1007/BF01400372

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01400372 1927

  28. [28]

    2008, Gravitational waves (Oxford University Press)

    Maggiore, M. 2008, Gravitational waves (Oxford University Press)

    2008

  29. [29]

    H., & Deb, B

    March, N. H., & Deb, B. M. 1987, The single-particle density in physics and chemistry (Academic Press, London)

    1987

  30. [30]

    2003, ApJ, 593, 96, doi: 10.1086/375330

    Markowitz, A., Edelson, R., Vaughan, S., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 96, doi: 10.1086/375330

    work page doi:10.1086/375330 2003

  31. [31]

    Fender, R. P. 2006, Nature, 444, 730, doi: 10.1038/nature05389

    work page doi:10.1038/nature05389 2006

  32. [32]

    Miller-Jones, J. C. A., Strader, J., Heinke, C. O., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 453, 3918

    2015

  33. [33]

    Nature , author =

    Miniutti, G., Saxton, R. D., Giustini, M., et al. 2019, Nature, 573, 381, doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1556-x 2019

  34. [34]

    Vito, M. A. 2010, Physics Letters B, 683, 119, doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.011 Niko lajuk, M., Karpiuk, T., & Brewczyk, M. 2026a. https://youtu.be/UDbM1FjWyDI —. 2026b. https://youtube.com/shorts/r7 2MVDvwEM Niko lajuk, M., Karpiuk, T., Ducci, L., & Brewczyk, M. 2025, ApJ, 980, 256, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adae8c

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2009.12.011 2010

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Nikolajuk, M., Papadakis, I. E., & Czerny, B. 2004, MNRAS, 350, L26, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07829.x Paczy´ nsky, B., & Wiita, P. J. 1980, A&A, 88, 23

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07829.x 2004

  36. [36]

    2014, PhRvL, 112, 250404, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250404

    Pires, R., Ulmanis, J., H¨ afner, S., et al. 2014, PhRvL, 112, 250404, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.250404

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.112.250404 2014

  37. [37]

    2019, SciPost Physics, 6, 079, doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.6.079

    Rakshit, D., Karpiuk, T., Brewczyk, M., & Gajda, M. 2019, SciPost Physics, 6, 079, doi: 10.21468/SciPostPhys.6.6.079

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphys.6.6.079 2019

  38. [38]

    2022, Physics Reports, 988, 1

    Saumon, D., Blouin, S., & Tremblay, P.-E. 2022, Physics Reports, 988, 1

    2022

  39. [39]

    The physics of compact objects

    Shapiro, S. L., & Teukolsky, S. A. 1983, Black holes, white dwarfs and neutron stars. The physics of compact objects (A Wiley-Interscience Publication), doi: 10.1002/9783527617661

    work page doi:10.1002/9783527617661 1983

  40. [40]

    2019, ApJL, 871, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aafc64

    Shen, R.-F. 2019, ApJL, 871, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aafc64

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aafc64 2019

  41. [41]

    R., Sarazin, C

    Sivakoff, G. R., Sarazin, C. L., & Jord´ an, A. 2005, ApJL, 624, L17, doi: 10.1086/430374

    work page doi:10.1086/430374 2005

  42. [42]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 330 ´Swis locki, T., Gawryluk, K., Brewczyk, M., & Karpiuk, T

    Stoop, M., van den Eijnden, J., Degenaar, N., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 330 ´Swis locki, T., Gawryluk, K., Brewczyk, M., & Karpiuk, T. 2026, Comput. Phys. Commun., 318, 109897

    2021

  43. [43]

    2022, A&A, 661, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142662

    Tiengo, A., Esposito, P., Toscani, M., et al. 2022, A&A, 661, A68, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142662

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142662 2022

  44. [44]

    V., & Fedorova, A

    Tutukov, A. V., & Fedorova, A. V. 2007, Astronomy Reports, 51, 847, doi: 10.1134/S1063772907100095

    work page doi:10.1134/s1063772907100095 2007

  45. [45]

    , eprint =

    Uttley, P., McHardy, I. M., & Papadakis, I. E. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05298.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05298.x 2002

  46. [46]

    2002, PhRvA, 66, 063604, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.063604

    Viverit, L., & Giorgini, S. 2002, PhRvA, 66, 063604, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.063604

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.66.063604 2002

  47. [47]

    Wong, C.-Y., & McDonald, J. A. 1977, PhRvC, 16, 1196, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.16.1196

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.16.1196 1977