Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 102 references

Materealistic? How European energy system models exceed raw material reserves

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Decarbonised European energy models exceed population shares of global reserves for seven materials.

desk verdict The paper consolidates material demands across 59 European energy studies but the population-share reserve benchmark does not test actual feasibility. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12201 v1 pith:6OGJKLPG submitted 2026-06-10 econ.GN q-fin.EC

Jan Mutke , Jonas Finke , Katharina Esser , Heidi Heinrichs This is my paper · ORCID
classification econ.GNq-fin.EC
keywords energysystemmodelscriticalrawmaterialsdecarbonisationmaterialfeasibilityEuropeantransitionreservessufficiency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reviews 59 studies that model highly decarbonised European energy systems and performs an ex-post calculation of the raw materials needed for five key technologies across nineteen materials. It compares those demands to the share of current global reserves that would be allocated to Europe on a population basis. Demands surpass the shares for gallium, indium, iridium and tellurium, with additional shortfalls for silver, selenium and vanadium once electricity, heat and transport sectors are modelled together. The analysis shows that efficiency improvements, recycling and reserve growth can only partly close the gaps, leading to the conclusion that energy sufficiency measures are required.

What carries the argument

Ex-post material demand assessment applied to the 59 studies, using material intensities for five key technologies and nineteen materials, then compared directly to Europe's population-proportional share of global reserves.

What would settle it

New data showing that the actual material requirements per unit of installed capacity for the modelled technologies are substantially lower than the intensities used in the ex-post calculations.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A systematic review of 59 highly decarbonised European energy system modelling studies combined with quantitative ex-post assessment of material demands for five key technologies and nineteen materials finds that material demands exceed Europe's population-based shares of current global reserves for gallium, indium, iridium and tellurium, less pronounced for silver, selenium and vanadium, particularly when multiple sectors of the energy system are considered.

Load-bearing premise

The material intensity numbers taken from the studies accurately describe the technologies that would be built, and population proportion is the right way to decide how much of the world's reserves Europe can count on.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Material shortfalls become larger when electricity, heat and transport are all included in the models.
  • Non-energy uses of the same materials increase the overall scarcity pressure.
  • Technological innovation can either reduce or raise material requirements depending on the direction of change.
  • Efficiency, recycling and expanded reserves only partly relieve the identified shortages.
  • Energy sufficiency measures are needed to reach sustainability in the energy-material system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future energy system studies will need to incorporate material constraints from the start rather than treating them as an afterthought.
  • European policy targets may require explicit trade-offs between deployment speed and material availability.
  • Global coordination on recycling and new mining will be necessary if European scenarios are to be realised without major shortfalls.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper conducts a systematic review of 59 highly decarbonised European energy system modelling studies, performs an ex-post quantitative assessment of material demands for 5 key technologies and 19 materials, and concludes that these demands exceed Europe's population-based shares of current global reserves for seven materials (Ga, In, Ir, Te; less pronounced for Ag, Se, V), especially when multiple sectors are considered. It further notes that competing non-energy demand amplifies scarcity while innovation can alleviate or intensify it, and calls for energy sufficiency measures.

Significance. If the population-based allocation metric is accepted as appropriate, the findings would indicate material constraints that could limit the feasibility of many published European decarbonization pathways, strengthening the case for integrating material limits into energy system modeling. The systematic review of 59 studies supplies a broad evidence base, and the ex-post approach enables cross-model comparison; these are clear strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and implied Methods: the central claim that demands 'exceed' Europe's population-based shares of global reserves for Ga, In, Ir, Te (and less so Ag, Se, V) is load-bearing on the choice of population proportion as the allocation metric, yet no justification is supplied for why this demographic share is the correct benchmark for material feasibility when global supply is determined by markets, contracts, and extraction economics rather than fixed population allocations.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the ex-post material demand calculations for the 59 studies are presented without visible error bars, sensitivity checks on material intensities, or details on study selection criteria and intensity derivation; this directly affects whether the seven-material exceedance result is robust.
minor comments (2)
  1. The title 'Materealistic?' is informal for a journal submission; a more descriptive title would improve clarity.
  2. Notation for the 19 materials and 5 technologies should be defined explicitly in a table or methods subsection to aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their thoughtful review and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and propose revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and implied Methods: the central claim that demands 'exceed' Europe's population-based shares of global reserves for Ga, In, Ir, Te (and less so Ag, Se, V) is load-bearing on the choice of population proportion as the allocation metric, yet no justification is supplied for why this demographic share is the correct benchmark for material feasibility when global supply is determined by markets, contracts, and extraction economics rather than fixed population allocations.

    Authors: We agree that the choice of allocation metric requires explicit justification. The population-based share is employed as a normative benchmark to evaluate the equity of material demands under a fair per-capita distribution of global reserves, which is pertinent for assessing the global sustainability implications of European energy scenarios. This approach is common in studies of resource equity and planetary boundaries. We will add a subsection in the Methods explaining this rationale, supported by relevant citations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the ex-post material demand calculations for the 59 studies are presented without visible error bars, sensitivity checks on material intensities, or details on study selection criteria and intensity derivation; this directly affects whether the seven-material exceedance result is robust.

    Authors: The study selection criteria are detailed in Section 2 following the PRISMA framework, and material intensity data sources are described in Section 3 with values provided in the supplementary information. However, we acknowledge the absence of explicit sensitivity analyses and error bars in the main results. We will incorporate sensitivity checks on key material intensities and report uncertainty ranges in the revised manuscript to enhance the robustness assessment. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: ex-post comparison uses independent external data

full rationale

The paper conducts a systematic review of 59 external studies and performs ex-post material demand calculations using published model outputs and global reserve data. No self-definitional equations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear in the derivation. The exceedance findings for Ga, In, Ir, Te and others are obtained by direct comparison to population-based reserve shares without reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction. The allocation metric choice is a modeling assumption open to critique but does not create circularity under the defined patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on external global reserve statistics and technology-specific material intensity coefficients taken from prior literature; the paper adds the aggregation step across the 59 models. No new physical constants or entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • population-based allocation fraction
    The decision to allocate global reserves to Europe according to population share is a normative modeling choice rather than a derived quantity.
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Current published global reserve figures are accurate and stable benchmarks for comparison
    Invoked when comparing modelled demands against 'current global reserves' (abstract).
  • domain assumption Material intensity coefficients for the five key technologies are representative and transferable across the 59 studies
    Required for the uniform ex-post assessment described in the abstract.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Materealistic? How European energy system models exceed raw material reserves." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/6OGJKLPG

@misc{pith2026260612201,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Materealistic? How European energy system models exceed raw material reserves},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/6OGJKLPG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12201}
}
read the original abstract

Decarbonising energy systems reduces emissions and fossil fuel dependency, but expanding renewables increases demands for critical raw materials. Most energy system models, however, neglect material demands, putting the material feasibility of energy scenarios at question. We combine a systematic review of 59 highly decarbonised European energy system modelling studies with a quantitative ex-post assessment of material demands for 5 key technologies and 19 materials. We find that material demands exceed Europe's population-based shares of current global reserves for seven materials (Ga, In, Ir, Te; less pronounced for Ag, Se, V), in particular if multiple sectors of the energy system are considered. Competing non-energy demand further amplifies the scarcity, while technological innovation can either alleviate or intensify it. We conclude that energy efficiency, recycling, expanding reserves and technological innovation may only partly address the identified shortages and call for energy sufficiency measures to achieve sustainability in the energy-material nexus.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12201 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Capacity expansion of six energy technologies across 59 highly decarbonised Euro [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies. Above 100% indicate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies without (”neglected”) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies with varying techno [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Literature review process based on the PRISMA guidelines. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies with population-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Distribution of demand-to-reserve ratio (DRR) across all studies in the reference case, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 86 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025

    International Energy Agency. Global Critical Minerals Outlook 2025. Tech. Rep. IEA Paris (2025). URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/ global-critical-minerals-outlook-2025

    2025

  2. [2]

    Schulze, K., Heinrichs, H., Weinand, J.M., and Stolten, D. (2024). From fossil fuels to metals and minerals: Navigating global resource challenges in the energy transition. Cell Reports Sustainability1, 100239. doi:10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100239

    work page doi:10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100239 2024

  3. [3]

    European Parliament (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1252 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 April 2024 establishing a framework for ensuring a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials and amending Regulations (EU) No 168/2013, (EU) 2018/858, (EU) 2018/1724 and (EU) 2019/1020Text with EEA relevance. . URL: https://eur-lex.europ...

    2024

  4. [4]

    Berthet, E., Lavalley, J., Anquetil-Deck, C., Ballesteros, F ., Stadler, K., Soytas, U., Hauschild, M., and Laurent, A. (2024). Assessing the social and environmental impacts of critical mineral supply chains for the energy transition in Europe. Global Environmental Change86, 102841. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841

    work page doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2024.102841 2024

  5. [5]

    Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU – A foresight study

    Carrara, S., Bobba, S., Blagoeva, D., Alves Dias, P ., Cavalli, A., Georgitzikis, K., Grohol, M., Itul, A., Kuzov, T., Latunussa, C., Lyons, L., Malano, G., Maury, T., Prior Arce, ´A., Somers, J., Telsnig, T., Veeh, C., Wittmer, D., Black, C., Pennington, D., Christou, M. Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sec...

    work page doi:10.2760/386650 2023

  6. [6]

    The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions

    International Energy Agency. The Role of Critical Minerals in Clean Energy Transitions. World Energy Outlook Special Report Interna- tional Energy Agency Paris (2021). URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/ the-role-of-critical-minerals-in-clean-energy-transitions. 21

    2021

  7. [7]

    Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023: Final Report

    European Commission (2023). Study on the Critical Raw Materials for the EU 2023: Final Report. LU: Publications Office. URL:https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2873/725585

    work page doi:10.2873/725585 2023

  8. [8]

    Critical Materials Assessment

    Bauer, D.J., Smith, B.J., and Nguyen, R.T. Critical Materials Assessment. Technical Re- port U.S. Department of Energy (2023). URL:https://www.energy.gov/sites/default/ files/2023-07/doe-critical-material-assessment_07312023.pdf

    2023

Show all 102 references
  1. [9]

    UK 2024 critical- ity assessment

    Mudd, G., Josso, P ., Shaw, R., Luce, A., Singh, N., Horn, S., Bide, T., Currie, D., Elliott, H., Grant, H., Halkes, R., Idoine, N., Mitchell, C., Price, F ., and Petavratzi, E. UK 2024 critical- ity assessment. Open Report OR/24/047 British Geological Survey (2024). URL:https...

    2024

  2. [10]

    Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., and Keirstead, J. (2014). Energy systems modeling for twenty- first century energy challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews33, 74–86. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003

    2014 doi

  3. [11]

    Vai, A., Colucci, G., Nicoli, M., and Savoldi, L. (2025). May the availability of critical raw materials affect the security of energy systems? An analysis for risk-aware energy plan- ning with TEMOA-Italy. Materials Today Energy48, 101805. doi:10.1016/j.mtener. 2025.101805

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    Colucci, G., Finke, J., Bertsch, V., Di Cosmo, V., and Savoldi, L. (2025). Combined assess- ment of material and energy supply risks in the energy transition: A multi-objective energy system optimization approach. Applied Energy388, 125647. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy. 2025.125647

    2025 doi

  5. [13]

    Rauner, S., and Budzinski, M. (2017). Holistic energy system modeling combining multi- objective optimization and life cycle assessment. Environmental Research Letters12, 124005. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aa914d

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Tokimatsu, K., Wachtmeister, H., McLellan, B., Davidsson, S., Murakami, S., H¨o¨ok, M., Y a- suoka, R., and Nishio, M. (2017). Energy modeling approach to the global energy-mineral nexus: A first look at metal requirements and the 2 ◦C target. Applied Energy207, 494–

    2017

  7. [15]

    doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.05.151. 22

    2017 doi

  8. [16]

    Tokimatsu, K., H ¨o¨ok, M., McLellan, B., Wachtmeister, H., Murakami, S., Y asuoka, R., and Nishio, M. (2018). Energy modeling approach to the global energy-mineral nexus: Exploring metal requirements and the well-below 2 ◦C target with 100 percent renewable energy. Applied En...

    2018 doi

  9. [17]

    Brown, T., H ¨orsch, J., and Schlachtberger, D. (2018). PyPSA: Python for Power System Analysis. Journal of Open Research Software6, 4. doi:10.5334/jors.188

    2018 doi

  10. [18]

    Pfenninger, S., and Pickering, B. (2018). Calliope: A multi-scale energy systems modelling framework. Journal of Open Source Software3, 825. doi:10.21105/joss.00825

    2018 doi

  11. [20]

    Martin, N., Talens-Peir ´o, L., Villalba-M´endez, G., Nebot-Medina, R., and Madrid-L´opez, C. (2023). An energy future beyond climate neutrality: Comprehensive evaluations of transi- tion pathways. Applied Energy331, 120366. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.120366

    2023 doi

  12. [21]

    Junne, T., Simon, S., Buchgeister, J., Saiger, M., Baumann, M., Haase, M., Wulf, C., and Naegler, T. (2020). Environmental Sustainability Assessment of Multi-Sectoral Energy Transformation Pathways: Methodological Approach and Case Study for Germany. Sus- tainability12, 8225. ...

    2020 doi

  13. [22]

    Fuss, M., and Xu, L. (2021). Unintended Environmental Impacts at Local and Global Scale—Trade-Offs of a Low-Carbon Electricity System. In D. M ¨ost, S. Schreiber, A. Herbst, M. Jakob, A. Martino, and W.R. Poganietz, eds. The Future European Energy System pp. 237–255.. Cham: Sp...

    2021 doi

  14. [23]

    Moreau, V., Dos Reis, P .C., and Vuille, F . (2019). Enough Metals? Resource Con- straints to Supply a Fully Renewable Energy System. Resources8, 29. doi:10.3390/ resources8010029. 23

    2019

  15. [24]

    Schlichenmaier, S., and Naegler, T. (2022). May material bottlenecks hamper the global energy transition towards the 1.5 ◦C target? Energy Reports8, 14875–14887. doi:10. 1016/j.egyr.2022.11.025

    2022

  16. [25]

    Koljonen, T., Lehtil ¨a, A., Kiviranta, K., Koponen, K., and Simil ¨a, L. (2024). Modelling of demands of selected minerals and metals in clean energy transition with 1.5–2.0 ◦C mit- igation targets. In M. Labriet, K. Espegren, G. Giannakidis, and B. ´O Gallach ´oir, eds. Alig...

    2024 doi

  17. [26]

    Schulze, K., Kullmann, F ., Weinand, J.M., and Stolten, D. (2024). Overcoming the chal- lenges of assessing the global raw material demand of future energy systems. Joule8, 1936–1957. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2024.05.016

    2024 doi

  18. [27]

    Montana, F ., Cellura, M., Silvestre, M.L.D., Longo, S., Luu, L.Q., Sanseverino, E.R., and Scium`e, G. (2024). Assessing Critical Raw Materials and Their Supply Risk in Energy Technologies—A Literature Review. Energies18. doi:10.3390/en18010086

    2024 doi

  19. [28]

    Wortmann, B., Stolten, D., and Heinrichs, H. (2025). Critical Iridium Demands arising from future Expansion of Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolysis. arXiv. doi:10.48550/ ARXIV.2509.05357

    2025

  20. [29]

    Critical materials: Batteries for electric vehicles

    IRENA. Critical materials: Batteries for electric vehicles. Tech. Rep. International Renew- able Energy Agency Abu Dhabi (2024). URL:https://www.irena.org/Publications/ 2024/Sep/Critical-materials-Batteries-for-electric-vehicles

    2024

  21. [30]

    Material requirements for electricity grids

    Nohl, L., Finck, R., Magnani, N., Volkanovski, A., Black, C., and Tzimas, E. Material requirements for electricity grids. Tech. Rep. JRC143190 European Commission, Joint Research Centre (2025). URL:https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/ handle/JRC143190

    2025

  22. [31]

    Smart Is Not Smart Enough!

    David, M., and Koch, F . (2019). “Smart Is Not Smart Enough!” Anticipating Critical Raw Material Use in Smart City Concepts: The Example of Smart Grids. Sustainability11,

    2019

  23. [32]

    doi:10.3390/su11164422. 24

    doi

  24. [33]

    Strategy of the Enough

    Michaelis, J., Vogel, B., Strunz, S., Lucht, W., Dahms, H., Dornack, C., Geissler, A., Hertin, J., Hoffart, F ., Kemfert, C., Klein, M., K¨ock, W., Lage, J., Marquard, E., Schmalz, S., Set- tele, J., Sommer, B., Weiss, S., and Wiegand, S. (2024). Sufficiency as a “Strategy of ...

    2024 doi

  25. [34]

    Wiese, F ., Taillard, N., Balembois, E., Best, B., Bourgeois, S., Campos, J., Cordroch, L., Djelali, M., Gabert, A., Jacob, A., Johnson, E., Meyer, S., Munk ´acsy, B., Pagliano, L., Quoilin, S., Roscetti, A., Thema, J., Thiran, P ., Toledano, A., Vogel, B., Zell-Ziegler, C., a...

    2024 doi

  26. [35]

    Nitsch, F ., Wetzel, M., Gils, H.C., and Nienhaus, K. (2024). The future role of Carnot batteries in Central Europe: Combining energy system and market perspective. Journal of Energy Storage85, 110959. doi:10.1016/j.est.2024.110959

    2024 doi

  27. [36]

    Recycling of Critical Minerals

    International Energy Agency. Recycling of Critical Minerals. A World Energy Outlook Special Report IEA Paris (2024). URL:https://www.iea.org/reports/ recycling-of-critical-minerals

    2024

  28. [37]

    Geological Survey

    U.S. Geological Survey. Mineral commodity summaries 2026. Tech. Rep. USGS (2026). doi:10.3133/mcs2026

    2026 doi

  29. [38]

    Buarque Andrade, L., Frenzel, M., Bookhagen, B., Kresse, C., Schmidt, M., Nassar, N., Alonso, E., Shojaeddini, E., and Sandmann, D. (2024). From exploration to production: Understanding the development dynamics of lithium mining projects. Resources Policy 99, 105423. doi:10.10...

    2024 doi

  30. [39]

    Page, M.J., McKenzie, J.E., Bossuyt, P .M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T.C., Mulrow, C.D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J.M., Akl, E.A., Brennan, S.E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J.M., Hr ´objartsson, A., Lalu, M.M., Li, T., Loder, E.W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., McGuinnes...

    2021 doi

  31. [40]

    Scopus Database

    Elsevier (2026). Scopus Database. . URL:https://www.scopus.com

    2026

  32. [41]

    Bertsch, V., Finke, J., Esser, K., Plaga, L.S., Mersch, M., Stelzer, J., Atakan, B., Fichtner, W., Markides, C.N., and Sioshansi, R. (2025). How can energy-system mod- els inform technology development? Insights for emerging energy-storage technolo- gies. International Journal...

    2025 doi

  33. [42]

    Pedersen, T.T., Gøtske, E.K., Dvorak, A., Andresen, G.B., and Victoria, M. (2022). Long- term implications of reduced gas imports on the decarbonization of the European energy system. Joule6, 1566–1580. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.06.023

    2022 doi

  34. [43]

    Rahdan, P ., Zeyen, E., and Victoria, M. (2025). Strategic deployment of solar photovoltaics for achieving self-sufficiency in Europe throughout the energy transition. Nature Commu- nications16, 6259. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61492-9

    2025 doi

  35. [44]

    Zeyen, E., Victoria, M., and Brown, T. (2023). Endogenous learning for green hydrogen in a sector-coupled energy model for Europe. Nature Communications14, 3743. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39397-2

    2023 doi

  36. [45]

    Rahdan, P ., Zeyen, E., Gallego-Castillo, C., and Victoria, M. (2024). Distributed photo- voltaics provides key benefits for a highly renewable European energy system. Applied Energy360, 122721. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122721

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    Gøtske, E.K., Andresen, G.B., Neumann, F ., and Victoria, M. (2024). Designing a sector- coupled European energy system robust to 60 years of historical weather data. Nature Communications15, 10680. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54853-3

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    Neumann, F ., Zeyen, E., Victoria, M., and Brown, T. (2023). The potential role of a hydro- gen network in Europe. Joule7, 1793–1817. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2023.06.016

    2023 doi

  39. [48]

    Pickering, B., Lombardi, F ., and Pfenninger, S. (2022). Diversity of options to eliminate 26 fossil fuels and reach carbon neutrality across the entire European energy system. Joule 6, 1253–1276. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2022.05.009

    2022 doi

  40. [49]

    Lux, B., and Pfluger, B. (2020). A supply curve of electricity-based hydrogen in a decarbonized European energy system in 2050. Applied Energy269, 115011. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115011

    2020 doi

  41. [50]

    Wu, F ., Muller, A., and Pfenninger, S. (2023). Strategic uses for ancillary bioenergy in a carbon-neutral and fossil-free 2050 European energy system. Environmental Research Letters18, 014019. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aca9e1

    2023 doi

  42. [51]

    Bussar, C., St ¨ocker, P ., Cai, Z., Moraes Jr., L., Magnor, D., Wiernes, P ., Bracht, N.V., Moser, A., and Sauer, D.U. (2016). Large-scale integration of renewable energies and impact on storage demand in a European renewable power system of 2050—Sensitivity study. Journal of...

    2016 doi

  43. [52]

    Morales-Espa ˜na, G., Hern ´andez-Serna, R., Tejada-Arango, D.A., and Weeda, M. (2024). Impact of large-scale hydrogen electrification and retrofitting of natural gas infrastructure on the European power system. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Sys- tems155, ...

    2024 doi

  44. [53]

    Gawlick, J., and Hamacher, T. (2023). Impact of coupling the electricity and hydrogen sector in a zero-emission European energy system in 2050. Energy Policy180, 113646. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113646

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    Akhmetov, Y ., Fedotova, E., and Frysztacki, M.M. (2025). Flattening the peak demand curve through energy efficient buildings: A holistic approach towards net-zero carbon. Applied Energy384, 125421. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2025.125421

    2025 doi

  46. [55]

    Victoria, M., Zhu, K., Brown, T., Andresen, G.B., and Greiner, M. (2020). Early decarbon- isation of the European energy system pays off. Nature Communications11, 6223. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20015-4

    2020 doi

  47. [56]

    Aliasghari, P ., G¨oke, L., and Egging-Bratseth, R. (2025). The potential of electrified trans- 27 port for enhancing flexibility in integrated renewable energy systems. Energy Reports13, 3379–3401. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2025.03.002

    2025 doi

  48. [57]

    Dunkel, P ., Kl ¨utz, T., Linßen, J., and Stolten, D. (2025). Towards Hydrogen Autarky? Evaluating Import Costs and Domestic Competitiveness in European Energy Strategies. arXiv. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.2510.04669

    2025 doi

  49. [58]

    Kern, T., and Kigle, S. (2022). Modeling and evaluating bidirectionally chargeable electric vehicles in the future European energy system. Energy Reports8, 694–708. doi:10. 1016/j.egyr.2022.10.277

    2022

  50. [59]

    Johanndeiter, S., Helist ¨o, N., Kiviluoma, J., and Bertsch, V. (2024). Price Formation and Intersectoral Distributional Effects in a Fully Decarbonised European Electricity Market. SSRN. doi:10.2139/ssrn.4887442

    2024 doi

  51. [60]

    Blumberg, G., Broll, R., and Weber, C. (2022). The impact of electric vehicles on the future European electricity system – A scenario analysis. Energy Policy161, 112751. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112751

    2022 doi

  52. [61]

    Johanndeiter, S., Helist ¨o, N., and Bertsch, V. (2025). Does the difference make a differ- ence? Evaluating Contracts for Difference design in a fully decarbonised European elec- tricity market. Resource and Energy Economics83, 101495. doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco. 2025.101495

    2025 doi

  53. [62]

    Seck, G.S., Hache, E., Sabathier, J., Guedes, F ., Reigstad, G.A., Straus, J., Wolfgang, O., Ouassou, J.A., Askeland, M., Hjorth, I., Skjelbred, H.I., Andersson, L.E., Douguet, S., Villavicencio, M., Tr ¨uby, J., Brauer, J., and Cabot, C. (2022). Hydrogen and the de- carboniza...

    2022 doi

  54. [63]

    Misconel, S., Z ¨ophel, C., and M ¨ost, D. (2021). Assessing the value of demand response in a decarbonized energy system – A large-scale model application. Applied Energy299, 117326. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117326. 28

    2021 doi

  55. [64]

    Dom ´ınguez, R., Vitali, S., Carri ´on, M., and Moriggia, V. (2021). Analysing decarboniz- ing strategies in the European power system applying stochastic dominance constraints. Energy Economics101, 105438. doi:10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105438

    2021 doi

  56. [65]

    Child, M., Kemfert, C., Bogdanov, D., and Breyer, C. (2019). Flexible electricity genera- tion, grid exchange and storage for the transition to a 100% renewable energy system in Europe. Renewable Energy139, 80–101. doi:10.1016/j.renene.2019.02.077

    2019 doi

  57. [66]

    Pleßmann, G., and Blechinger, P . (2017). How to meet EU GHG emission reduction tar- gets? A model based decarbonization pathway for Europe’s electricity supply system until

    2017

  58. [67]

    doi:10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003

    Energy Strategy Reviews15, 19–32. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2016.11.003

    2016 doi

  59. [68]

    Yueksel-Erguen, I., Most, D., Wyrwoll, L., Schmitt, C., and Zittel, J. (2025). Model- ing the transition of the multimodal pan-European energy system including an inte- grated analysis of electricity and gas transport. Energy Systems16, 1187–1232. doi: 10.1007/s12667-023-00637-5

    2025 doi

  60. [69]

    Zhu, K., Victoria, M., Brown, T., Andresen, G., and Greiner, M. (2019). Impact of CO2 prices on the design of a highly decarbonised coupled electricity and heating system in Europe. Applied Energy236, 622–634. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.016

    2019 doi

  61. [70]

    H ¨artel, P ., and Korp˚as, M. (2017). Aggregation Methods for Modelling Hydropower and Its Implications for a Highly Decarbonised Energy System in Europe. Energies10, 1841. doi: 10.3390/en10111841

    2017 doi

  62. [71]

    Junne, T., Cao, K.K., Miskiw, K.K., Hottenroth, H., and Naegler, T. (2021). Considering Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Power System Expansion Planning for Europe and North Africa Using Multi-Objective Optimization. Energies14, 1301. doi:10.3390/ en14051301

    2021

  63. [72]

    Heggarty, T., Bourmaud, J.Y ., Girard, R., and Kariniotakis, G. (2024). Assessing the rela- tive impacts of maximum investment rate and temporal detail in capacity expansion models applied to power systems. Energy290, 130231. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.130231. 29

    2024 doi

  64. [73]

    Helgeson, B., and Peter, J. (2020). The role of electricity in decarbonizing European road transport – Development and assessment of an integrated multi-sectoral model. Applied Energy262, 114365. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114365

    2020 doi

  65. [74]

    Backe, S., Skar, C., Del Granado, P .C., Turgut, O., and Tomasgard, A. (2022). EMPIRE: An open-source model based on multi-horizon programming for energy transition analyses. SoftwareX17, 100877. doi:10.1016/j.softx.2021.100877

    2022 doi

  66. [75]

    Caglayan, D.G., Heinrichs, H.U., Robinius, M., and Stolten, D. (2021). Robust design of a future 100% renewable european energy supply system with hydrogen infrastructure. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy46, 29376–29390. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene. 2020.12.197

    2021 doi

  67. [76]

    Mutke, J., Plaga, L.S., and Bertsch, V. (2023). Influence of bioenergy and transmission ex- pansion on electrical energy storage requirements in a gradually decarbonized European power system. Journal of Cleaner Production419, 138133. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro. 2023.138133

    2023 doi

  68. [77]

    B ´eres, R., Van Der Wel, A., Fattahi, A., and Van Den Broek, M. (2024). The impact of national policies on Europe-wide power system transition towards net-zero 2050. Energy 310, 133216. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2024.133216

    2024 doi

  69. [78]

    Van Greevenbroek, K., Grochowicz, A., Zeyringer, M., and Benth, F .E. (2025). Trading off regional and overall energy system design flexibility in the net-zero transition. Nature Sustainability8, 629–641. doi:10.1038/s41893-025-01556-2

    2025 doi

  70. [79]

    Sasanpour, S., Cao, K.K., Gils, H.C., and Jochem, P . (2021). Strategic policy targets and the contribution of hydrogen in a 100% renewable European power system. Energy Re- ports7, 4595–4608. doi:10.1016/j.egyr.2021.07.005

    2021 doi

  71. [80]

    Pedersen, T.T., Victoria, M., Rasmussen, M.G., and Andresen, G.B. (2021). Modeling all alternative solutions for highly renewable energy systems. Energy234, 121294. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.121294. 30

    2021 doi

  72. [81]

    Mara ˜n´on-Ledesma, H., and Tomasgard, A. (2019). Analyzing Demand Response in a Dynamic Capacity Expansion Model for the European Power Market. Energies12, 2976. doi:10.3390/en12152976

    2019 doi

  73. [82]

    Che, X., Liu, L., and He, W. (2025). Assess space-based solar power for European-scale power system decarbonization. Joule9, 102074. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2025.102074

    2025 doi

  74. [83]

    B ´eres, R., Junginger, M., and Broek, M.V.D. (2024). Assessing the feasibility of CO2 re- moval strategies in achieving climate-neutral power systems: Insights from biomass, CO2 capture, and direct air capture in Europe. Advances in Applied Energy14, 100166. doi: 10.1016/j.ad...

    2024 doi

  75. [84]

    Victoria, M., Zhu, K., Brown, T., Andresen, G.B., and Greiner, M. (2020). The role of pho- tovoltaics in a sustainable European energy system under variable CO2 emissions targets, transmission capacities, and costs assumptions. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applicati...

    2020 doi

  76. [85]

    Neumann, F ., and Brown, T. (2023). Broad ranges of investment configurations for renew- able power systems, robust to cost uncertainty and near-optimality. iScience26, 106702. doi:10.1016/j.isci.2023.106702

    2023 doi

  77. [86]

    Hjelmeland, M., Nøland, J.K., Backe, S., and Korp ˚as, M. (2025). The role of nuclear en- ergy and baseload demand in capacity expansion planning for low-carbon power systems. Applied Energy377, 124366. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.124366

    2025 doi

  78. [87]

    Neumann, F ., and Brown, T. (2021). The near-optimal feasible space of a renewable power system model. Electric Power Systems Research190, 106690. doi:10.1016/j.epsr. 2020.106690

    2021 doi

  79. [88]

    Backe, S., Ahang, M., and Tomasgard, A. (2021). Stable stochastic capacity expansion with variable renewables: Comparing moment matching and stratified scenario generation sampling. Applied Energy302, 117538. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117538

    2021 doi

  80. [89]

    Ringkjøb, H.K., Haugan, P .M., Seljom, P ., Lind, A., Wagner, F ., and Mesfun, S. (2020). 31 Short-term solar and wind variability in long-term energy system models - A European case study. Energy209, 118377. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2020.118377

    2020 doi

  81. [90]

    Schlachtberger, D., Brown, T., Sch ¨afer, M., Schramm, S., and Greiner, M. (2018). Cost optimal scenarios of a future highly renewable European electricity system: Exploring the influence of weather data, cost parameters and policy constraints. Energy163, 100–114. doi:10.1016/...

    2018 doi

  82. [91]

    Cebulla, F ., Naegler, T., and Pohl, M. (2017). Electrical energy storage in highly renew- able European energy systems: Capacity requirements, spatial distribution, and storage dispatch. Journal of Energy Storage14, 211–223. doi:10.1016/j.est.2017.10.004

    2017 doi

  83. [92]

    Cao, K.K., Pregger, T., Haas, J., and Lens, H. (2021). To Prevent or Promote Grid Expan- sion? Analyzing the Future Role of Power Transmission in the European Energy System. Frontiers in Energy Research8, 541495. doi:10.3389/fenrg.2020.541495

    2021 doi

  84. [93]

    Teng, F ., Pudjianto, D., Aunedi, M., and Strbac, G. (2018). Assessment of Future Whole- System Value of Large-Scale Pumped Storage Plants in Europe. Energies11, 246. doi: 10.3390/en11010246

    2018 doi

  85. [95]

    Gotzens, F ., Heinrichs, H., Hake, J.F ., and Allelein, H.J. (2018). The influence of continued reductions in renewable energy cost on the European electricity system. Energy Strategy Reviews21, 71–81. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2018.04.007

    2018 doi

  86. [96]

    Peter, J. (2019). How does climate change affect electricity system planning and optimal allocation of variable renewable energy? Applied Energy252, 113397. doi:10.1016/j. apenergy.2019.113397

    2019 doi

  87. [97]

    Tr ¨ondle, T., Lilliestam, J., Marelli, S., and Pfenninger, S. (2020). Trade-Offs between Ge- ographic Scale, Cost, and Infrastructure Requirements for Fully Renewable Electricity in Europe. Joule4, 1929–1948. doi:10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.018. 32

    2020 doi

  88. [98]

    Dubois, A., and Ernst, D. (2022). Computing necessary conditions for near-optimality in capacity expansion planning problems. Electric Power Systems Research211, 108343. doi:10.1016/j.epsr.2022.108343

    2022 doi

  89. [99]

    Schmid, E., and Knopf, B. (2015). Quantifying the long-term economic benefits of Euro- pean electricity system integration. Energy Policy87, 260–269. doi:10.1016/j.enpol. 2015.09.026

    2015 doi

  90. [100]

    Schlott, M., Kies, A., Brown, T., Schramm, S., and Greiner, M. (2018). The impact of climate change on a cost-optimal highly renewable European electricity network. Applied Energy230, 1645–1659. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.09.084

    2018 doi

  91. [101]

    Papadaskalopoulos, D., Moreira, R., Strbac, G., Pudjianto, D., Djapic, P ., Teng, F ., and Papapetrou, M. (2018). Quantifying the Potential Economic Benefits of Flexible Industrial Demand in the European Power System. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics14, 5123–5132. d...

    2018 doi

  92. [102]

    KC, S., Moradhvaj, Potancokova, M., Adhikari, S., Yildiz, D., Mamolo, M., Sobotka, T., Ze- man, K., Abel, G., Lutz, W., and Goujon, A. (2024). Wittgenstein Center (WIC) Population and Human Capital Projections - 2023. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/ZENODO.7767425

    2024 doi

  93. [103]

    Crespo Cuaresma, J. (2017). Income projections for climate change research: A frame- work based on human capital dynamics. Global Environmental Change42, 226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.02.012

    2017 doi

  94. [104]

    S ¨oltzer, L., Wortmann, B., Stolten, D., Linßen, J., and Heinrichs, H. (2026). Material bot- tlenecks of batteries within the energy transition. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 227, 108745. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2025.108745. 33 APPENDIX Further result figures Figure 6...

    2026 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.