Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 146 references

TESS detection of periodic brightness variations during the rise of classical nova PGIR22akgylf

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Periodic brightness variations detected by TESS in PGIR22akgylf arise from binary orbital motion distorting the nova envelope.

desk verdict The paper reports a stable 0.18-day signal in TESS data during the rise of a slow nova and ties it to orbital motion in a dwarf-donor system, but the claim that the envelope was still comparable to binary separation at that epoch rests on an unquantified assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.12532 v1 pith:4ZU5KLLT submitted 2026-06-10 astro-ph.SR

Kirill V. Sokolovsky , Elias Aydi , Konstantin Malanchev , Koji Mukai , Jennifer L. Sokoloski , Laura Chomiuk , Peter Allen Craig , Rebekah A. Hounsell
show 9 more authors
Justin D. Linford Isabella Molina Montana N. Williams Kishalay De Mansi M. Kasliwal Nicholas Earley David J. Lane Filipp D. Romanov Richard Schmidt
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SR
keywords classicalnovaeTESSphotometryperiodicbrightnessvariationscommon-envelopeinteractionnovaenvelopedwarfdonorslowrise
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports TESS observations of the slowly rising classical nova PGIR22akgylf that reveal a stable 0.1802-day periodic signal. This periodicity is interpreted as the orbital period of a dwarf companion whose motion distorts the expanding envelope while it is still comparable in size to the binary separation. The finding indicates that common-envelope interaction plays a role in ejecting the shell in this system. It also shows that the slow-rise behavior is not limited to novae with giant companions in symbiotic binaries.

What carries the argument

The 0.1802-day periodic signal from TESS photometry, interpreted as orbital distortion of the nova envelope by the binary motion.

What would settle it

Detection of a changing period over time or spectroscopic evidence that the light source is not the photosphere would undermine the orbital distortion interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The detected 0.1802 d periodic brightness modulation in PGIR22akgylf, observed 3 to 16 days after discovery when the nova was still rising, originates from the orbital motion of the binary system distorting the nova envelope. This points to common-envelope interaction contributing to the shell ejection mechanism, demonstrating that slow rises can occur in systems with dwarf donors.

Load-bearing premise

That the observed light comes primarily from the expanding photosphere and that the detected period directly reflects the binary orbital period or its half.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The nova's light at the time of observation is dominated by the expanding photosphere rather than accretion or other sources.
  • The period corresponds to the full or half orbital period of a dwarf donor companion.
  • Common-envelope interaction contributes to shell ejection in PGIR22akgylf.
  • The slow-rise phenomenon occurs outside of symbiotic binaries with large orbital separations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If similar periodic signals are found in other slow-rising novae, it would support a general role for envelope distortion in rise times.
  • Models of nova ejection could incorporate common-envelope effects even for close binaries with dwarf donors.
  • Follow-up spectroscopy might confirm the orbital period by measuring radial velocities of the companion.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper reports TESS photometry of the slowly-rising classical nova PGIR22akgylf spanning 3–16 days post-discovery (supplemented by ground-based data covering the full ~133 d rise), detecting a stable periodic brightness modulation of period 0.1802 ± 0.0012 d and ~0.02 mag amplitude. The authors identify the signal with the nova via coincidence and interpret it as orbital modulation from binary distortion of the envelope while its size remains comparable to the binary separation, implying a dwarf donor and common-envelope interaction as a contributor to shell ejection (distinct from symbiotic systems).

Significance. If the interpretation holds, the result supplies an observational constraint on envelope structure and binary interaction during the early rise of a classical nova with a dwarf companion, supporting the idea that common-envelope effects can influence ejection even outside symbiotic systems. The period detection itself rests on standard time-series methods with a stability check.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and interpretation section: the central claim that the TESS-epoch light is photosphere-dominated and that R_phot remains comparable to a_bin (required for the distortion interpretation and common-envelope conclusion) is asserted without any quantitative estimate; no expansion velocity, blackbody radius, or model-based R_phot at 3–16 d is supplied, and the 133 d rise time alone does not constrain R_phot ~ a_bin rather than >> a_bin.
minor comments (2)
  1. The period uncertainty derivation and any alias checks should be stated explicitly in the methods or results section.
  2. Figure captions for the light curve and periodogram should include the exact time baseline and any detrending details applied to the TESS data.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and for identifying the need for quantitative support of the photospheric radius claim. We address the point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate an explicit estimate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and interpretation section: the central claim that the TESS-epoch light is photosphere-dominated and that R_phot remains comparable to a_bin (required for the distortion interpretation and common-envelope conclusion) is asserted without any quantitative estimate; no expansion velocity, blackbody radius, or model-based R_phot at 3–16 d is supplied, and the 133 d rise time alone does not constrain R_phot ~ a_bin rather than >> a_bin.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantitative estimate strengthens the interpretation and that the 133-day rise time by itself is insufficient. In the revised manuscript we will add a calculation of R_phot at the TESS epoch (3–16 d post-discovery). Using the observed magnitude (~6 mag above quiescence, 4 mag below peak), a conservative distance, and a blackbody temperature of ~8000–12000 K appropriate for early nova phases, we obtain R_phot ~ few × 10^11 cm. For a 0.18 d orbital period with a dwarf donor this is comparable to a_bin, supporting the distortion interpretation. We will also cite typical nova expansion velocities (~100–300 km/s at early times) to show that the photosphere has not yet expanded far beyond binary scales. This addresses the referee’s concern directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: observational detection plus standard interpretation

full rationale

The paper reports a TESS-detected 0.1802 d periodic signal in PGIR22akgylf, notes its stability and coincidence with the nova, and interprets it as orbital distortion of the envelope under the assumption that the photosphere dominates the light and remains comparable in size to the binary separation. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are presented that reduce this interpretation to a tautology or force the result by construction. The central claim rests on direct photometry and conventional astrophysical reasoning rather than any of the enumerated circular patterns.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The interpretation relies on standard assumptions about nova photospheric emission and binary geometry rather than new free parameters or invented entities. No explicit free parameters are introduced in the abstract; the period is measured from data.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Nova light during the rise phase is dominated by emission from the expanding photosphere rather than residual accretion or other components.
    Invoked to attribute the periodic modulation to envelope distortion by orbital motion.
  • domain assumption The measured 0.18 d period corresponds to the orbital period or half-period of a dwarf donor binary.
    Used to conclude the companion is a dwarf and to infer envelope size comparable to binary separation.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of TESS detection of periodic brightness variations during the rise of classical nova PGIR22akgylf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4ZU5KLLT

@misc{pith2026260612532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: TESS detection of periodic brightness variations during the rise of classical nova PGIR22akgylf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4ZU5KLLT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.12532}
}
read the original abstract

Classical novae are transient events powered by thermonuclear burning in a layer of hydrogen-rich material accreted by a white dwarf from its binary companion. Most classical novae reach optical maximum within ~1 d, but a rare few rise far more slowly. We probe the envelope structure and ejection mechanism of the slowly-rising nova PGIR22akgylf with TESS photometry spanning 3 to 16 d after the nova discovery, supplemented by ground-based observations that cover its full ~133 d ascent to maximum. We detect a 0.1802 +/-0.0012 d periodic brightness modulation with a peak-to-peak amplitude of ~0.02 mag, identified with PGIR22akgylf via temporal and spatial coincidence. The period is stable over the two weeks of TESS coverage, suggesting an orbital origin. Whether this period corresponds to the full or half orbital period, it implies a dwarf donor companion. At the time of the TESS observations the nova was >~6 mag above quiescence (but still 4 mag below peak), so its light should be dominated by the expanding photosphere. We interpret the periodic signal as arising from the binary orbital motion distorting the nova envelope while its size remains comparable to the binary separation. This interpretation points to common-envelope interaction as a contributor to shell ejection in PGIR22akgylf and demonstrates that the slow-rise phenomenon is not exclusive to thermonuclear eruptions in symbiotic binaries, where the large orbital separation of the giant companion inhibits such interaction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12532 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The combined lightcurve of PGIR22akgylf presenting TESS photometry of the nova (§ 2.4) in the context of ground￾based measurements (§ 2.2). The arrows mark times of optical (green; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The optical spectrum of Nova PGIR22akgylf obtained on 2022-08-26 (t0 + 10 d) with the Double Beam spectrograph at the Palomar 200-inch telescope (§ 2.3). Spectral features are marked with colored line identifications for clarity. tribute it to the source aperture being contaminated by the light from a nearby (50′′ from PGIR22akgylf) variable star ATO J300.1356+34.8776 also known as ZTF J200032.54+345239.5, KISO J200… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Near-infrared spectra of Nova PGIR22akgylf obtained on 2022-09-08 (t0 + 23 d) with the TripleSpec spectrograph on the Palomar 200-inch telescope and 2022-10-09 (t0 + 54 d) using the SpeX spectrograph on the NASA Infrared Telescope Facility. A vertical offset has been applied to separate the spectra visually. Line identifications are marked to guide the reader. 9 9  9  9 9 9  + "%")#$)# & [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:f… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: TESS images of PGIR22akgylf obtained at the beginning on Sector 55 observations on 2022-08-05.6106 TDB when PGIR22akgylf was faint (left) and around the end of Sector 55 on 2022-09-01.6241 when the nova was bright (right). Positions of PGIR22akgylf, the nearby eclipsin…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as the right panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: TESS lightcurve of PGIR22akgylf obtained during the first (top left) and second (top right) orbits of Sector 55. The corresponding Lomb-Scargle periodogram plots are presented at the bottom panels. The drop in power at frequencies below ∼ 2.5 d −1 is the result of detr…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: TESS Sector 55 lightcurve (top) and Lomb￾Scargle periodogram (bottom) of the check star TYC 2678- 1207-1 ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The detrended TESS Sector 55 lightcurve of PGIR22akgylf phased with light elements from equation (1). periodic signal during Sector 55 was the yet-to-be fully ejected nova envelope. The nova was well in the decline phase by the time of Sector 74 and 75 observations, by…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The grid of plots presenting periodograms of background-subtracted detrended lightcurves extracted from each individual pixel of the cutout shown in Figures 4 and 5. The lightcurves are restricted to the second half of Sector 55, same as the aperture lightcurve present…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The best period map (left) and the highest periodogram power map (right) corresponding to the periodogram plots presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: TESS Sector 55 lightcurve split in six chunks for independent period analysis (top). Period (middle) and peak-to-mean amplitude (bottom) as a function of time. TESS observations was 10 to 25R⊙ – between 4 and 16 times larger than the binary separation (depending on ph…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

146 extracted references · 127 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Science , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Abdo, A. A., Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., et al. 2010, Science, 329, 817, doi: 10.1126/science.1192537

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1192537 2010

  2. [2]

    , keywords =

    Abe, K., Abe, S., Abhishek, A., et al. 2025, A&A, 695, A152, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452447 18 Sokolovsky et al

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452447 2025

  3. [3]

    Nature Astronomy , keywords =

    Acciari, V. A., Ansoldi, S., Antonelli, L. A., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 689, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01640-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01640-z 2022

  4. [4]

    2014, Science, 345, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1253947 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Ackermann, M., Ajello, M., Albert, A., et al. 2014, Science, 345, 554, doi: 10.1126/science.1253947 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration...

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1253947 2014

  5. [5]

    2018, Phd thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape

    Aydi, E. 2018, Phd thesis, University of Cape Town, Cape

    2018

  6. [6]

    V., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Aydi, E., Sokolovsky, K. V., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2020a, Nature Astronomy, 4, 776, doi: 10.1038/s41550-020-1070-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-1070-y

  7. [7]

    2020b, ApJ, 905, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc3bb

    Aydi, E., Chomiuk, L., Izzo, L., et al. 2020b, ApJ, 905, 62, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc3bb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc3bb

  8. [8]

    2023, MNRAS, 524, 1946, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1914

    Aydi, E., Chomiuk, L., Mikołajewska, J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 1946, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1914

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1914 2023

Show all 146 references
  1. [9]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 9303, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3342

    Aydi, E., Chomiuk, L., Strader, J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 9303, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3342

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    D., Mérand, A., et al

    Aydi, E., Monnier, J. D., Mérand, A., et al. 2026, Nature Astronomy, 10, 271, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02725-1

    2026 doi

  3. [11]

    G., & Evans, N

    Barnes, T. G., & Evans, N. R. 1970, PASP, 82, 889, doi: 10.1086/128978

    1970 doi

  4. [12]

    T., & Shaviv, G

    Bath, G. T., & Shaviv, G. 1976, MNRAS, 175, 305, doi: 10.1093/mnras/175.2.305

    1976 doi

  5. [13]

    C., Kulkarni, S

    Bellm, E. C., Kulkarni, S. R., Graham, M. J., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aaecbe

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    W., et al

    Blank, R., Anglin, S., Beletic, J. W., et al. 2011, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 437, Solar Polarization 6, ed. J. R. Kuhn, D. M

    2011

  7. [15]

    2016, Photutils: Photometry tools, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.011

    Bradley, L., Sipocz, B., Robitaille, T., et al. 2016, Photutils: Photometry tools, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1609.011. http://ascl.net/1609.011

    2016

  8. [16]

    E., Phillip, C., Fleming, S

    Brasseur, C. E., Phillip, C., Fleming, S. W., Mullally, S. E., & White, R. L. 2019, Astrocut: Tools for creating cutouts of TESS images. http://ascl.net/1905.007

    2019

  9. [17]

    2023a, MNRAS, 519, 352, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3493 —

    Bruch, A. 2023a, MNRAS, 519, 352, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3493 —. 2023b, MNRAS, 525, 1953, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2089

    1953 doi

  10. [18]

    C., Magnier, E

    Chambers, K. C., Magnier, E. A., Metcalfe, N., et al. 2016, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1612.05560, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1612.05560

    2016 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    Chen, X., Wang, S., Deng, L., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 18, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9cae

    2020 doi

  12. [20]

    C., Johnson, T

    Cheung, C. C., Johnson, T. J., Jean, P., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 44, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7eb7

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    1997, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 27, 53

    Chochol, D., & Pribulla, T. 1997, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 27, 53

    1997

  14. [22]

    D., & Shen, K

    Chomiuk, L., Metzger, B. D., & Shen, K. J. 2021a, ARA&A, 59, 391, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-112420-114502

    doi

  15. [23]

    D., Yang, J., et al

    Chomiuk, L., Linford, J. D., Yang, J., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 339, doi: 10.1038/nature13773

    2014 doi

  16. [24]

    D., Aydi, E., et al

    Chomiuk, L., Linford, J. D., Aydi, E., et al. 2021b, ApJS, 257, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac24ab

    doi

  17. [25]

    2025, ApJ, 981, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb628

    Cohen, A., Guetta, D., Hillman, Y., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 198, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adb628

    2025 doi

  18. [26]

    Condon, J. J. 1974, ApJ, 188, 279, doi: 10.1086/152714

    1974 doi

  19. [27]

    2026, MNRAS, 546, staf2270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2270

    Craig, P., Aydi, E., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 546, staf2270, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf2270

    2026 doi

  20. [28]

    C., Vacca, W

    Cushing, M. C., Vacca, W. D., & Rayner, J. T. 2004, PASP, 116, 362, doi: 10.1086/382907

    2004 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Kasliwal, M

    De, K., Hankins, M. J., Kasliwal, M. M., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 025001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab6069

    2020 doi

  22. [30]

    M., Hankins, M

    De, K., Kasliwal, M. M., Hankins, M. J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 912, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abeb75

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    B., et al

    De, K., Soria, R., Agusti, M. B., et al. 2022, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 15587, 1

    2022

  24. [32]

    Deeming, T. J. 1975, Ap&SS, 36, 137, doi: 10.1007/BF00681947 Dubovský, P. A., Petrík, K., & Breus, V. 2024, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 54, 128, doi: 10.31577/caosp.2024.54.2.128

    1975 doi

  25. [33]

    Eyres, S. P. S., Bewsher, D., Hillman, Y., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 467, 2684, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx298

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    C., & Pringle, J

    Fabian, A. C., & Pringle, J. E. 1977, MNRAS, 180, 749, doi: 10.1093/mnras/180.4.749

    1977 doi

  27. [35]

    2018, A&A, 609, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731516

    Buson, S. 2018, A&A, 609, A120, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731516

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    1990, in IAU Colloq

    Friedjung, M. 1990, in IAU Colloq. 122: Physics of Classical Novae, ed. A. Cassatella & R. Viotti, Vol. 369, 244, doi: 10.1007/3-540-53500-4_132 —. 2004, Baltic Astronomy, 13, 116 González-Bolívar, M., De Marco, O., Lau, M. Y. M., Hirai, R., & Price, D. J. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 31...

    1990 doi

  29. [37]

    P., Katysheva, N

    Goranskij, V. P., Katysheva, N. A., Kusakin, A. V., et al. 2007, Astrophysical Bulletin, 62, 125, doi: 10.1134/S1990341307020046

    2007 doi

  30. [38]

    C., Aydi, E., Page, K

    Gordon, A. C., Aydi, E., Page, K. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe547 TESS photometry of PGIR22akgylf 19

    2021 doi

  31. [39]

    J., Kulkarni, S

    Graham, M. J., Kulkarni, S. R., Bellm, E. C., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 078001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab006c H. E. S. S. Collaboration, Aharonian, F., Ait Benkhali, F., et al. 2022, Science, 376, 77, doi: 10.1126/science.abn0567

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    2004, ApJL, 612, L57, doi: 10.1086/424595

    Hachisu, I., & Kato, M. 2004, ApJL, 612, L57, doi: 10.1086/424595

    2004 doi

  33. [41]

    E., & Campbell, R

    Harrison, T. E., & Campbell, R. K. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 4161, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw961

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    N., Tonry, J

    Heinze, A. N., Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 241, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aae47f

    2018 doi

  35. [43]

    L., Henderson, C

    Herter, T. L., Henderson, C. P., Wilson, J. C., et al. 2008, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 7014, Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy II, ed. I. S. McLean & M. M. Casali, 70140X, doi: 10.1117/12.789660

    2008 doi

  36. [44]

    2022, MNRAS, 515, 1404, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1688

    Hillman, Y. 2022, MNRAS, 515, 1404, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1688

    2022 doi

  37. [45]

    Neill, J. D. 2014, MNRAS, 437, 1962, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2027

    2014 doi

  38. [46]

    Hogg, D. W. 2001, AJ, 121, 1207, doi: 10.1086/318736

    2001 doi

  39. [47]

    L., Rushton, M

    Holdsworth, D. L., Rushton, M. T., Bewsher, D., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 3483, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2455

    2014 doi

  40. [48]

    J., Bode, M

    Hounsell, R., Darnley, M. J., Bode, M. F., et al. 2016, ApJ, 820, 104, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/820/2/104

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Iben, Jr., I. 2003, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 303, Symbiotic Stars Probing Stellar Evolution, ed. R. L. M. Corradi, J. Mikolajewska, & T. J. Mahoney, 177

    2003

  42. [50]

    Ivanov, L. N. 1978, Soviet Astronomy Letters, 4, 141

    1978

  43. [51]

    Lombardi, J. C. 2013, Science, 339, 433, doi: 10.1126/science.1225540

    2013 doi

  44. [52]

    Kahabka, P., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1997, ARA&A, 35, 69, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.35.1.69

    1997 doi

  45. [53]

    1994, ApJ, 437, 802, doi: 10.1086/175041 —

    Kato, M., & Hachisu, I. 1994, ApJ, 437, 802, doi: 10.1086/175041 —. 2009, ApJ, 699, 1293, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/1293 —. 2011, ApJ, 743, 157, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/743/2/157

    1994 doi

  46. [54]

    2015, in The Golden Age of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects - III (Golden2015), 52, doi: 10.22323/1.255.0052

    Kato, M., & Hachisu, I. 2015, in The Golden Age of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects - III (Golden2015), 52, doi: 10.22323/1.255.0052

    2015 doi

  47. [55]

    2021, ApJ, 910, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe53d —

    Kawash, A., Chomiuk, L., Strader, J., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 120, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe53d —. 2022, ApJ, 937, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d5e

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    J., & Truran, J

    Kenyon, S. J., & Truran, J. W. 1983, ApJ, 273, 280, doi: 10.1086/161367

    1983 doi

  49. [57]

    Kloppenborg, B. K. 2025, Observations from the AA VSO International Database, https://www.aavso.org König, O., Wilms, J., Arcodia, R., et al. 2022, Nature, 605, 248, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04635-y

    2025 doi

  50. [58]

    G., Lipunov, V

    Kornilov, V. G., Lipunov, V. M., Gorbovskoy, E. S., et al. 2012, Experimental Astronomy, 33, 173, doi: 10.1007/s10686-011-9280-z

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    2019, Acta Astronautica, 160, 46, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.016

    Vanderspek, R. 2019, Acta Astronautica, 160, 46, doi: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.04.016

    2019 doi

  52. [60]

    Kuiper, G. P. 1941, ApJ, 93, 133, doi: 10.1086/144252

    1941 doi

  53. [61]

    K., Aly, J.-J., Cook, M

    Lamb, F. K., Aly, J.-J., Cook, M. C., & Lamb, D. Q. 1983, ApJL, 274, L71, doi: 10.1086/184153

    1983 doi

  54. [62]

    D., Chomiuk, L., et al

    Li, K.-L., Metzger, B. D., Chomiuk, L., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 697, doi: 10.1038/s41550-017-0222-1 Lightkurve Collaboration, Cardoso, J. V. d. M., Hedges, C., et al. 2018, Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ...

    2017 doi

  55. [63]

    1975, Nature, 258, 501, doi: 10.1038/258501a0

    Lindegren, L., & Lindgren, H. 1975, Nature, 258, 501, doi: 10.1038/258501a0

    1975 doi

  56. [64]

    2010, Advances in Astronomy, 2010, 349171, doi: 10.1155/2010/349171

    Lipunov, V., Kornilov, V., Gorbovskoy, E., et al. 2010, Advances in Astronomy, 2010, 349171, doi: 10.1155/2010/349171

    2010 doi

  57. [65]

    Livio, M., Shankar, A., Burkert, A., & Truran, J. W. 1990, ApJ, 356, 250, doi: 10.1086/168836

    1990 doi

  58. [66]

    Lomb, N. R. 1976, Ap&SS, 39, 447, doi: 10.1007/BF00648343

    1976 doi

  59. [67]

    Luna, G. J. M., Dobrotka, A., & Orio, M. 2026a, A&A, 708, A352, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202557972

    doi

  60. [68]

    Luna, G. J. M., Lima, I. J., & Orio, M. 2024, Boletin de la Asociacion Argentina de Astronomia La Plata Argentina, 65, 60, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.02220

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    Luna, G. J. M., Rawat, N., Angeloni, R., et al. 2026b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2605.22802, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2605.22802

    doi arXiv

  62. [70]

    C., & Stone, J

    MacLeod, M., Ostriker, E. C., & Stone, J. M. 2018, ApJ, 863, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aacf08

    2018 doi

  63. [71]

    V., Pruzhinskaya, M

    Malanchev, K., Kornilov, M. V., Pruzhinskaya, M. V., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 024503, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acb292

    2023 doi

  64. [72]

    J., Laher, R

    Masci, F. J., Laher, R. R., Rusholme, B., et al. 2019, PASP, 131, 018003, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aae8ac

    2019 doi

  65. [73]

    2008, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Mikolajewska, J. 2008, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 401, RS Ophiuchi (2006) and the Recurrent Nova Phenomenon, ed. A. Evans, M. F. Bode, T. J. O’Brien, & M. J. Darnley, 42, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0803.3685 Mikołajewska, J. 2012, Baltic Astronomy,...

    2008 doi arXiv

  66. [74]

    2025, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 55, 47, doi: 10.31577/caosp.2025.55.3.47

    Munari, U. 2025, Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnate Pleso, 55, 47, doi: 10.31577/caosp.2025.55.3.47

    2025 doi

  67. [75]

    J., & Frigo, A

    Munari, U., Hambsch, F. J., & Frigo, A. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 4341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1116

    2017 doi

  68. [76]

    U., Osborne, J

    Ness, J. U., Osborne, J. P., Henze, M., et al. 2013, A&A, 559, A50, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322415

    2013 doi

  69. [77]

    J., Wynn, G

    Norton, A. J., Wynn, G. A., & Somerscales, R. V. 2004, ApJ, 614, 349, doi: 10.1086/423333

    2004 doi

  70. [78]

    Ofek, E. O. 2019, PASP, 131, 054504, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab04df

    2019 doi

  71. [79]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1982, PASP, 94, 586, doi: 10.1086/131027

    1982 doi

  72. [80]

    2026, ApJ, 1004, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6a8c

    Olbemo, T., Errando, M., & Gokus, A. 2026, ApJ, 1004, 38, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae6a8c

    2026 doi

  73. [81]

    G., Collins, K

    Paegert, M., Stassun, K. G., Collins, K. A., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2108.04778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2108.04778

    2021 doi

  74. [82]

    1979, ApJ, 231, 789, doi: 10.1086/157244

    Patterson, J. 1979, ApJ, 231, 789, doi: 10.1086/157244

    1979 doi

  75. [83]

    2022, ApJL, 940, L56, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ebe

    Patterson, J., Enenstein, J., de Miguel, E., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L56, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9ebe

    2022 doi

  76. [84]

    2020, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of

    Pavana, M. 2020, PhD thesis, Indian Institute of

    2020

  77. [85]

    P., Mason, P

    Pavlenko, E. P., Mason, P. A., Sosnovskij, A. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 341, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1494

    2018 doi

  78. [86]

    2014, ApJ, 788, 22, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/22

    Pejcha, O. 2014, ApJ, 788, 22, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/22

    2014 doi

  79. [87]

    D., & Tomida, K

    Pejcha, O., Metzger, B. D., & Tomida, K. 2016a, MNRAS, 461, 2527, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1481 —. 2016b, MNRAS, 455, 4351, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2592

    doi

  80. [88]

    D., Tyles, J

    Pejcha, O., Metzger, B. D., Tyles, J. G., & Tomida, K. 2017, ApJ, 850, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa95b9

    2017 doi

  81. [89]

    2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1807.07947, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1807.07947

    Poggiani, R. 2018, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1807.07947, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1807.07947

    2018 doi arXiv

  82. [90]

    1995, ApJ, 445, 789, doi: 10.1086/175741

    Prialnik, D., & Kovetz, A. 1995, ApJ, 445, 789, doi: 10.1086/175741

    1995 doi

  83. [91]

    1995, PASP, 107, 1201, doi: 10.1086/133678

    Prialnik, D., & Livio, M. 1995, PASP, 107, 1201, doi: 10.1086/133678

    1995 doi

  84. [92]

    2026, NewA, 126, 102540, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2026.102540

    Qian, M.-Y., & Zhao, E.-G. 2026, NewA, 126, 102540, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2026.102540

    2026 doi

  85. [93]

    M., Metzger, B

    Quimby, R. M., Metzger, B. D., Shen, K. J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad887f

    2024 doi

  86. [94]

    T., Toomey, D

    Rayner, J. T., Toomey, D. W., Onaka, P. M., et al. 1998, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 3354, Infrared Astronomical Instrumentation, ed. A. M. Fowler, 468–479, doi: 10.1117/12.317273

    1998 doi

  87. [95]

    A., Shafter, A

    Rector, T. A., Shafter, A. W., Burris, W. A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 936, 117, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac87ad

    2022 doi

  88. [96]

    2021, AJ, 161, 176, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abe30e

    Ren, F., de Grijs, R., Zhang, H., et al. 2021, AJ, 161, 176, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abe30e

    2021 doi

  89. [97]

    R., Winn, J

    Ricker, G. R., Winn, J. N., Vanderspek, R., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 1, 014003, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.1.1.014003

    2015 doi

  90. [98]

    M., & Taam, R

    Ricker, P. M., & Taam, R. E. 2012, ApJ, 746, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/1/74

    2012 doi

  91. [99]

    Savitzky, A., & Golay, M. J. E. 1964, Analytical Chemistry, 36, 1627, doi: 10.1021/ac60214a047

    1964 doi

  92. [100]

    Scargle, J. D. 1982, ApJ, 263, 835, doi: 10.1086/160554

    1982 doi

  93. [101]

    Schaefer, B. E. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 3323, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3325 —. 2022a, MNRAS, 517, 3640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2089 —. 2022b, MNRAS, 517, 6150, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2900 —. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 785, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2223 —. 2025, ApJ, 993, 232, doi: 10.3847/1538-43...

    2020 doi

  94. [102]

    1998, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Schenker, K. 1998, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 137, Wild Stars in the Old West, ed. S. Howell, E. Kuulkers, & C. Woodward, 483

    1998

  95. [103]

    2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Schenker, K. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 259, IAU Colloq. 185: Radial and Nonradial Pulsationsn as Probes of Stellar Physics, ed. C. Aerts, T. R. Bedding, & J. Christensen-Dalsgaard, 580, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0109206

    2002 doi arXiv

  96. [104]

    1998, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Schenker, K., & Gautschy, A. 1998, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 135, A Half Century of Stellar Pulsation Interpretation, ed. P. A. Bradley & J. A. Guzik, 116

    1998

  97. [105]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  98. [106]

    Schmidt, R. E. 2016, Minor Planet Bulletin, 43, 129 —. 2020, JAA VSO, 48, 13 —. 2022, JAA VSO, 50, 260

    2016

  99. [107]

    J., Ness, J.-U., Osborne, J

    Schwarz, G. J., Ness, J.-U., Osborne, J. P., et al. 2011, ApJS, 197, 31, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/197/2/31

    2011 doi

  100. [108]

    1976, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 1157, 1

    Semeniuk, I., Kruszewski, A., & Schwarzenberg-Czerny, A. 1976, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 1157, 1

    1976

  101. [109]

    Shafter, A. W. 2017, ApJ, 834, 196, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/196

    2017 doi

  102. [110]

    W., & Hornoch, K

    Shafter, A. W., & Hornoch, K. 2026, ApJS, 283, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae3a86

    2026 doi

  103. [111]

    W., Rau, A., Quimby, R

    Shafter, A. W., Rau, A., Quimby, R. M., et al. 2009, ApJ, 690, 1148, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/690/2/1148

    2009 doi

  104. [112]

    M., Prialnik, D., Hillman, Y., & Kovetz, A

    Shara, M. M., Prialnik, D., Hillman, Y., & Kovetz, A. 2018, ApJ, 860, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabfbd

    2018 doi

  105. [113]

    Shaviv, N. J. 2001, MNRAS, 326, 126, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04574.x TESS photometry of PGIR22akgylf 21

    2001 doi

  106. [114]

    Shaviv, N. J. 2002, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 261, The Physics of Cataclysmic Variables and Related Objects, ed. B. T. Gänsicke, K. Beuermann, & K. Reinsch, 585

    2002

  107. [115]

    J., & Quataert, E

    Shen, K. J., & Quataert, E. 2022, ApJ, 938, 31, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9136

    2022 doi

  108. [116]

    Shore, S. N. 2014, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 490, Stellar Novae: Past and Future Decades, ed. P. A. Woudt & V. A. R. M. Ribeiro, 145

    2014

  109. [117]

    H., Lubow, S

    Shu, F. H., Lubow, S. H., & Anderson, L. 1979, ApJ, 229, 223, doi: 10.1086/156948

    1979 doi

  110. [118]

    Shugarov, S. Y. 1967, Astronomicheskij Tsirkulyar, 447, 7

    1967

  111. [119]

    Y., Goranskij, V

    Shugarov, S. Y., Goranskij, V. P., Katysheva, N. A., et al. 2005, Ap&SS, 296, 431, doi: 10.1007/s10509-005-4864-6

    2005 doi

  112. [120]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, AJ, 131, 1163, doi: 10.1086/498708

    2006 doi

  113. [121]

    W., Smartt, S

    Smith, K. W., Smartt, S. J., Young, D. R., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 085002, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab936e

    2020 doi

  114. [122]

    V., & Lebedev, A

    Sokolovsky, K. V., & Lebedev, A. A. 2018, Astronomy and Computing, 22, 28, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2017.12.001

    2018 doi

  115. [123]

    V., Strader, J., Swihart, S

    Sokolovsky, K. V., Strader, J., Swihart, S. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 934, 142, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7b25

    2022 doi

  116. [124]

    V., Aydi, E., Malanchev, K., et al

    Sokolovsky, K. V., Aydi, E., Malanchev, K., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.04903, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.04903

    2023 doi

  117. [125]

    M., & Sion, E

    Sparks, W. M., & Sion, E. M. 2021, ApJ, 914, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf2bc

    2021 doi

  118. [126]

    Starrfield, S., Iliadis, C., & Hix, W. R. 2016, PASP, 128, 051001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/128/963/051001

    2016 doi

  119. [127]

    S., Schmidt, G

    Stockman, H. S., Schmidt, G. D., & Lamb, D. Q. 1988, ApJ, 332, 282, doi: 10.1086/166652

    1988 doi

  120. [128]

    J., Schaefer, B

    Strope, R. J., Schaefer, B. E., & Henden, A. A. 2010, AJ, 140, 34, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/1/34

    2010 doi

  121. [129]

    2023, ApJ, 958, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0133

    Taguchi, K., Maeda, K., Maehara, H., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 156, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0133

    2023 doi

  122. [130]

    F., et al

    Tavleev, A., Ducci, L., Suleimanov, V. F., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A335, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451195

    2024 doi

  123. [131]

    1975, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 1052, 1

    Tempesti, P. 1975, Information Bulletin on Variable Stars, 1052, 1

    1975

  124. [132]

    1974, A&AS, 15, 107

    Terzan, A., Bally, M., & Durand, A. 1974, A&AS, 15, 107

    1974

  125. [133]

    Thompson, W. T. 2017, MNRAS, 470, 4061, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1552

    2017 doi

  126. [134]

    R., & Smith, D

    Marsh, T. R., & Smith, D. A. 2001, MNRAS, 327, 1323, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04828.x

    2001 doi

  127. [135]

    L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A

    Tonry, J. L., Denneau, L., Heinze, A. N., et al. 2018, PASP, 130, 064505, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/aabadf

    2018 doi

  128. [136]

    2011, A&A, 528, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016221

    Tylenda, R., Hajduk, M., Kamiński, T., et al. 2011, A&A, 528, A114, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201016221

    2011 doi

  129. [137]

    D., Cushing, M

    Vacca, W. D., Cushing, M. C., & Rayner, J. T. 2003, PASP, 115, 389, doi: 10.1086/346193

    2003 doi

  130. [138]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.04656, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.04656

    Vagnozzi, A. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2302.04656, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2302.04656

    2023 doi

  131. [139]

    VanderPlas, J. T. 2018, ApJS, 236, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aab766

    2018 doi

  132. [140]

    P., Fausnaugh, M., et al

    Vanderspek, R., Doty, J. P., Fausnaugh, M., et al. 2018, TESS Instrument Handbook (TESS Science Office). https://archive.stsci.edu/files/live/sites/mast/files/ home/missions-and-data/active-missions/tess/ _documents/TESS_Instrument_Handbook_v0.1.pdf

    2018

  133. [141]

    1990, ApJ, 356, 609, doi: 10.1086/168866

    Vogt, N. 1990, ApJ, 356, 609, doi: 10.1086/168866

    1990 doi

  134. [142]

    1996, Ap&SS, 241, 263, doi: 10.1007/BF00645229

    Warner, B. 1996, Ap&SS, 241, 263, doi: 10.1007/BF00645229

    1996 doi

  135. [143]

    M., Rudy, R

    Williams, R., Walter, F. M., Rudy, R. J., et al. 2022, ApJ, 941, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca2a9

    2022 doi

  136. [144]

    C., Darnley, M

    Williams, S. C., Darnley, M. J., Bode, M. F., & Shafter, A. W. 2016, ApJ, 817, 143, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/817/2/143

    2016 doi

  137. [145]

    M., & Kovetz, A

    Yaron, O., Prialnik, D., Shara, M. M., & Kovetz, A. 2005, ApJ, 623, 398, doi: 10.1086/428435

    2005 doi

  138. [146]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 3555, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1625

    Panagiotou, C. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3555, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1625

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.