pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13001 · v1 · pith:F5JZUDLGnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · 💻 cs.IR · cs.MM

CFALR: Collaborative Filtering-Augmented Large Language Model for Personalized Fashion Outfit Recommendation

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR cs.MM
keywords personalized outfit recommendationcollaborative filteringlarge language modelsfashion recommendationhybrid recommendationoutfit generationPolyvorefill-in-the-blank
0
0 comments X

The pith

A framework augments large language models with collaborative filtering embeddings to outperform both traditional and pure LLM methods on personalized outfit recommendation tasks.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces CFALR to combine collaborative filtering signals, which track user interaction patterns, with large language models that process fashion semantics through natural language descriptions of user-outfit pairs. Trainable projection layers merge the resulting embeddings to connect interaction history with aesthetic compatibility. This matters for e-commerce because pure collaborative filtering falters in sparse data while standalone LLMs overlook specific user histories, leaving the vast space of item combinations hard to navigate. A sympathetic reader would care if the hybrid can generate more accurate personalized outfits than either method alone on standard benchmarks.

Core claim

CFALR is the first LLM-based architecture for personalized outfit recommendation that uses a CF-augmented generative mechanism together with trainable projection layers to integrate collaborative interaction spaces with content semantics, producing superior results over both CF-based and LLM-based baselines on Polyvore and IQON for fill-in-the-blank and outfit generation tasks.

What carries the argument

Trainable projection layers that integrate CF-enhanced embeddings with LLM semantic representations to bridge collaborative and content spaces.

If this is right

  • The CF-augmented generative mechanism allows efficient navigation of the large combination space of outfit items.
  • Natural language descriptions of user-outfit interactions enable LLMs to capture fashion semantics while incorporating collaborative signals.
  • The approach yields measurable gains on both personalized fill-in-the-blank and personalized outfit generation tasks.
  • It supplies the first dedicated LLM architecture for this recommendation setting.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same projection-layer bridging technique could be tested on other recommendation domains that combine relational data with textual or visual content.
  • Generating recommendations in natural language may produce outputs that are easier for users to understand and act on.
  • Balancing collaborative and semantic signals might reduce certain popularity biases that appear in pure CF or pure LLM systems.

Load-bearing premise

CF-enhanced embeddings can be integrated with LLM semantic representations via trainable projection layers without significant loss of information or introduction of domain-specific biases.

What would settle it

If experiments on the Polyvore and IQON benchmarks show no performance advantage for CFALR over the strongest traditional CF and LLM baselines in the fill-in-the-blank and outfit generation tasks, the central claim would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13001 by Junrong Liao, Qing Li, Tat-Seng Chua, Wenqi Fan, Yi Bin, Yujuan Ding, Yunshan Ma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of the CFALR model, which includes four major procedures: 1) non-textual feature extraction, 2) hybrid user [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Personalized Outfit Generation Performance of CFALR model with different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Personalized FITB Accuracy of CFALR with regard to different prompt template (Left) and historical item number in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Outfit generation performance of four compared methods (our CFALR, GPT, CPTM and Vicuna) with regard to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Outfit generation performance of four compared methods (our CFALR, GPT, CPTM and Vicuna) with regard to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Outfit generation performance of four compared methods (our CFALR, GPT, CPTM and Vicuna) with regard to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Two successful personalized outfit generation (POG) cases showing the results of CFALR and main compared methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Two failure POG cases of CFALR. 5.12 Personalized Outfit Generation Cases [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Personalized outfit recommendation poses a significant challenge in e-commerce and social media platforms, requiring systems that balance user preferences with aesthetic compatibility. Collaborative filtering (CF) provides a traditional solution for this, but it struggles with data-sparse scenarios and complex user-item-outfit relationships. Meanwhile, existing template-based approaches are constrained by rigid pre-designed structures. To bridge these research gaps, we introduce CFALR (Collaborative Filtering-Augmented Large Language Model for Recommendation), a novel framework that synergizes collaborative filtering with large language models for personalized outfit recommendation. Specifically, CFALR describes user-outfit interactions in natural language and leverages LLMs to capture fashion semantics while employing CF-enhanced embeddings to bridge the semantic space and the collaborative interaction spaces. Our technical contributions include: (1) the first LLM-based architecture specifically designed for personalized outfit recommendation, (2) a CF-augmented generative mechanism that efficiently navigates the extensive combination space of outfit items, and (3) trainable projection layers that optimally integrate relational and content features. Experiments on Polyvore and IQON benchmarks demonstrate CFALR's superior performance over both traditional CF-based and LLM-based methods in personalized fill-in-the-blank and personalized outfit generation tasks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes CFALR, a framework that combines collaborative filtering with large language models for personalized fashion outfit recommendation. User-outfit interactions are described in natural language; LLMs capture fashion semantics while CF-enhanced embeddings, integrated via trainable projection layers, bridge the collaborative and content spaces. The paper claims three contributions: the first LLM-based architecture for this task, a CF-augmented generative mechanism for navigating outfit item combinations, and the projection layers for feature integration. Experiments on the Polyvore and IQON benchmarks are reported to show superior performance over traditional CF-based and LLM-based methods on personalized fill-in-the-blank and personalized outfit generation tasks.

Significance. If the integration of CF embeddings with LLM representations proves effective and the reported gains are robust, the work could advance hybrid recommendation methods in combinatorial domains such as fashion by addressing data sparsity and template rigidity. The natural-language framing of interactions offers a potentially reusable interface between interaction data and semantic models.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of superior performance on Polyvore and IQON is presented without any description of experimental protocol, metrics, baselines, statistical testing, or ablation results. This absence prevents evaluation of whether gains are attributable to the proposed CF-augmented mechanism or to post-hoc choices.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the opportunity to clarify the presentation of our experimental results. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim of superior performance on Polyvore and IQON is presented without any description of experimental protocol, metrics, baselines, statistical testing, or ablation results. This absence prevents evaluation of whether gains are attributable to the proposed CF-augmented mechanism or to post-hoc choices.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, due to its length constraints, omits the specific experimental details. The full manuscript (Section 4) specifies the protocol (5-fold cross-validation on Polyvore and IQON), metrics (accuracy and compatibility for fill-in-the-blank; diversity and user preference for generation), baselines (BPR, NeuMF, and LLM-only variants), statistical testing (paired t-tests over 5 runs with p<0.05), and ablations (removing projection layers and CF embeddings). These ablations confirm the gains stem from the CF augmentation rather than post-hoc choices. If the editor permits, we will add one sentence to the abstract summarizing the tasks and primary metrics. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The provided abstract and description contain no equations, derivation steps, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or self-citations that bear the central claim. The framework is described as a combination of established CF and LLM techniques with trainable projection layers, with effectiveness asserted via external benchmark experiments on Polyvore and IQON. This is an empirical claim rather than a self-referential derivation. No load-bearing step reduces to its own inputs by construction, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained result against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The central claim rests on the unstated assumption that the described integration mechanism functions as intended on the chosen benchmarks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5761 in / 1195 out tokens · 14877 ms · 2026-06-27T05:55:14.605696+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 7 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Josh Achiam, Steven Adler, Sandhini Agarwal, Lama Ahmad, Ilge Akkaya, Florencia Leoni Aleman, Diogo Almeida, Janko Altenschmidt, Sam Altman, Shyamal Anadkat, et al. 2023. Gpt-4 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.08774(2023)

  2. [2]

    Shuai Bai, Keqin Chen, Xuejing Liu, Jialin Wang, Wenbin Ge, Sibo Song, Kai Dang, Peng Wang, Shijie Wang, Jun Tang, et al . 2025. Qwen2. 5-vl technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.13923(2025)

  3. [3]

    Keqin Bao, Jizhi Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Yang Zhang, Zhengyi Yang, Yancheng Luo, Chong Chen, Fuli Feng, and Qi Tian. 2023. A bi-step grounding paradigm for large language models in recommendation systems.arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08434(2023)

  4. [4]

    Keqin Bao, Jizhi Zhang, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2023. Tallrec: An effective and efficient tuning framework to align large language model with recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1007–1014

  5. [5]

    Wen Chen, Pipei Huang, Jiaming Xu, Xin Guo, Cheng Guo, Fei Sun, Chao Li, Andreas Pfadler, Huan Zhao, and Binqiang Zhao. 2019. POG: personalized outfit generation for fashion recommendation at Alibaba iFashion. InProceedings of the 25th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery & data mining. 2662–2670

  6. [6]

    Wei-Lin Chiang, Zhuohan Li, Zi Lin, Ying Sheng, Zhanghao Wu, Hao Zhang, Lianmin Zheng, Siyuan Zhuang, Yonghao Zhuang, Joseph E Gonzalez, et al. 2023. Vicuna: An open-source chatbot impressing gpt-4 with 90%* chatgpt quality.See https://vicuna. lmsys. org (accessed 14 April 2023)2, 3 (2023), 6. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2026. CFALR:...

  7. [7]

    Sunhao Dai, Ninglu Shao, Haiyuan Zhao, Weijie Yu, Zihua Si, Chen Xu, Zhongxiang Sun, Xiao Zhang, and Jun Xu. 2023. Uncovering chatgpt’s capabilities in recommender systems. InProceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 1126–1132

  8. [8]

    Yujuan Ding, Zhihui Lai, PY Mok, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2023. Computational technologies for fashion recommendation: A survey.Comput. Surveys56, 5 (2023), 1–45

  9. [9]

    Yujuan Ding, Yunshan Ma, Lizi Liao, Wai Keung Wong, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Leveraging multiple relations for fashion trend forecasting based on social media.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia24 (2021), 2287–2299

  10. [10]

    Yujuan Ding, Yunshan Ma, Wai Keung Wong, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2021. Leveraging two types of global graph for sequential fashion recommendation. InProceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval. 73–81

  11. [11]

    Yujuan Ding, PY Mok, Yi Bin, Xun Yang, and Zhiyong Cheng. 2023. Modeling Multi-Relational Connectivity for Personalized Fashion Matching. InProceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Multimedia. 7047–7055

  12. [12]

    Yujuan Ding, PY Mok, Yunshan Ma, and Yi Bin. 2023. Personalized fashion outfit generation with user coordination preference learning. Information Processing & Management60, 5 (2023), 103434

  13. [13]

    Xiaoyu Du, Kun Qian, Yunshan Ma, and Xinguang Xiang. 2023. Enhancing item-level bundle representation for bundle recommendation. ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems(2023)

  14. [14]

    Wenqi Fan, Yujuan Ding, Liangbo Ning, Shijie Wang, Hengyun Li, Dawei Yin, Tat-Seng Chua, and Qing Li. 2024. A survey on rag meeting llms: Towards retrieval-augmented large language models. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 6491–6501

  15. [15]

    Yunfan Gao, Tao Sheng, Youlin Xiang, Yun Xiong, Haofen Wang, and Jiawei Zhang. 2023. Chat-rec: Towards interactive and explainable llms-augmented recommender system.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.14524(2023)

  16. [16]

    Shijie Geng, Shuchang Liu, Zuohui Fu, Yingqiang Ge, and Yongfeng Zhang. 2022. Recommendation as language processing (rlp): A unified pretrain, personalized prompt & predict paradigm (p5). InProceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 299–315

  17. [17]

    Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. VBPR: visual bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback. InProceedings of the AAAI conference on artificial intelligence, Vol. 30

  18. [18]

    Xiangnan He, Kuan Deng, Xiang Wang, Yan Li, Yongdong Zhang, and Meng Wang. 2020. Lightgcn: Simplifying and powering graph convolution network for recommendation. InProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in Information Retrieval. 639–648

  19. [19]

    Xiangnan He, Lizi Liao, Hanwang Zhang, Liqiang Nie, Xia Hu, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2017. Neural collaborative filtering. InProceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 173–182

  20. [20]

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, and Weizhu Chen. 2021. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09685(2021)

  21. [21]

    Juntong Hu, Shixuan Zhu, Chuan Cui, Qi Shen, Yu Ji, and Zhihua Wei. 2023. Text2bundle: Towards personalized query-based bundle generation.ACM Transactions on Recommender Systems(2023)

  22. [22]

    Urvashi Khandelwal, Omer Levy, Dan Jurafsky, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Mike Lewis. 2019. Generalization through memorization: Nearest neighbor language models.arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.00172(2019)

  23. [23]

    Sein Kim, Hongseok Kang, Seungyoon Choi, Donghyun Kim, Minchul Yang, and Chanyoung Park. 2024. Large language models meet collaborative filtering: An efficient all-round llm-based recommender system. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1395–1406

  24. [24]

    Genki Kusano, Kosuke Akimoto, and Kunihiro Takeoka. 2025. Revisiting prompt engineering: A comprehensive evaluation for llm-based personalized recommendation. InProceedings of the Nineteenth ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 832–841

  25. [25]

    Cheng Li, Jindong Wang, Yixuan Zhang, Kaijie Zhu, Wenxin Hou, Jianxun Lian, Fang Luo, Qiang Yang, and Xing Xie. 2023. Large language models understand and can be enhanced by emotional stimuli.arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.11760(2023)

  26. [26]

    Jiacheng Li, Ming Wang, Jin Li, Jinmiao Fu, Xin Shen, Jingbo Shang, and Julian McAuley. 2023. Text is all you need: Learning language representations for sequential recommendation. InProceedings of the 29th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1258–1267

  27. [27]

    Xingchen Li, Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Long Chen, Jun Xiao, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020. Hierarchical fashion graph network for personalized outfit recommendation. InProceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 159–168

  28. [28]

    Jiayi Liao, Sihang Li, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Yancheng Yuan, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2024. Llara: Large language- recommendation assistant. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1785–1795

  29. [29]

    Jianghao Lin, Rong Shan, Chenxu Zhu, Kounianhua Du, Bo Chen, Shigang Quan, Ruiming Tang, Yong Yu, and Weinan Zhang. 2024. Rella: Retrieval-enhanced large language models for lifelong sequential behavior comprehension in recommendation. InProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. 3497–3508. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2026. 28•Yu...

  30. [30]

    Shiqin Liu, Chaozhuo Li, Minjun Zhao, Litian Zhang, and Jiajun Bu. 2025. LLMCBR: Large Language Model-based Multi-View and Multi-Grained Learning for Bundle Recommendation. InProceedings of the 34th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1892–1902

  31. [31]

    Xiaohao Liu, Jie Wu, Zhulin Tao, Yunshan Ma, Yinwei Wei, and Tat-seng Chua. 2024. Harnessing Large Language Models for Multimodal Product Bundling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.11712(2024)

  32. [32]

    Xiaohao Liu, Jie Wu, Zhulin Tao, Yunshan Ma, Yinwei Wei, and Tat-seng Chua. 2025. Fine-tuning multimodal large language models for product bundling. InProceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V. 1. 848–858

  33. [33]

    Zhi Lu, Yang Hu, Yan Chen, and Bing Zeng. 2021. Personalized outfit recommendation with learnable anchors. InProceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 12722–12731

  34. [34]

    Yunshan Ma, Yujuan Ding, Xun Yang, Lizi Liao, Wai Keung Wong, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2020. Knowledge enhanced neural fashion trend forecasting. InProceedings of the 2020 international conference on multimedia retrieval. 82–90

  35. [35]

    Yunshan Ma, Xiaohao Liu, Yinwei Wei, Zhulin Tao, Xiang Wang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2024. Leveraging multimodal features and item-level user feedback for bundle construction. InProceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 510–519

  36. [36]

    Huy-Son Nguyen, Quang-Huy Nguyen, Duc-Hoang Pham, Duc-Trong Le, Hoang-Quynh Le, Padipat Sitkrongwong, Atsuhiro Takasu, and Masoud Mansoury. 2025. RaMen: Multi-Strategy Multi-Modal Learning for Bundle Construction.arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14361 (2025)

  37. [37]

    OpenAI. 2026. Introducing GPT-5.4. OpenAI Official Website. https://openai.com/zh-Hans-CN/index/introducing-gpt-5-4/ Accessed: 2026-04-01

  38. [38]

    Haohao Qu, Shanru Lin, Yujuan Ding, Yiqi Wang, and Wenqi Fan. 2026. Diffusion generative recommendation with continuous tokens. InProceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2026. 7259–7270

  39. [39]

    Qwen Team. 2026. Qwen3.5: Towards Native Multimodal Agents. https://qwen.ai/blog?id=qwen3.5

  40. [40]

    Steffen Rendle. 2010. Factorization machines. In2010 IEEE International conference on data mining. IEEE, 995–1000

  41. [41]

    Steffen Rendle, Christoph Freudenthaler, Zeno Gantner, and Lars Schmidt-Thieme. 2012. BPR: Bayesian personalized ranking from implicit feedback.arXiv preprint arXiv:1205.2618(2012)

  42. [42]

    Xuemeng Song, Xianjing Han, Yunkai Li, Jingyuan Chen, Xin-Shun Xu, and Liqiang Nie. 2019. GP-BPR: Personalized compatibility modeling for clothing matching. InProceedings of the 27th ACM international conference on multimedia. 320–328

  43. [43]

    Zhu Sun, Kaidong Feng, Jie Yang, Xinghua Qu, Hui Fang, Yew-Soon Ong, and Wenyuan Liu. 2023. Dynamic In-Context Learning from Nearest Neighbors for Bundle Generation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.16262(2023)

  44. [44]

    Zhongxiang Sun, Zihua Si, Xiaoxue Zang, Kai Zheng, Yang Song, Xiao Zhang, and Jun Xu. 2024. Large language models enhanced collaborative filtering. InProceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2178–2188

  45. [45]

    Teng Tu, Ai Li, Yunshan Ma, Shuo Xu, Xiaohao Liu, Haokai Ma, Liang Pang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2026. Discrete Diffusion for Bundle Construction. InThe Fourteenth International Conference on Learning Representations

  46. [46]

    Noah Wang, Zy Peng, Haoran Que, Jiaheng Liu, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yuhan Wu, Hongcheng Guo, Ruitong Gan, Zehao Ni, Jian Yang, et al. 2024. Rolellm: Benchmarking, eliciting, and enhancing role-playing abilities of large language models. InFindings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2024. 14743–14777

  47. [47]

    Peiyi Wang, Lei Li, Liang Chen, Zefan Cai, Dawei Zhu, Binghuai Lin, Yunbo Cao, Lingpeng Kong, Qi Liu, Tianyu Liu, et al. 2024. Large language models are not fair evaluators. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 9440–9450

  48. [48]

    Shijie Wang, Chengyi Liu, Yujuan Ding, Shanru Lin, See-Kiong Ng, Xu Xin, and Wenqi Fan. 2026. Mixture-of-Experts Knowledge Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Multi-Agent LLM-based Recommendation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.28175(2026)

  49. [49]

    Xiang Wang, Xiangnan He, Meng Wang, Fuli Feng, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2019. Neural graph collaborative filtering. InProceedings of the 42nd international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in Information Retrieval. 165–174

  50. [50]

    Jerry Wei, Jason Wei, Yi Tay, Dustin Tran, Albert Webson, Yifeng Lu, Xinyun Chen, Hanxiao Liu, Da Huang, Denny Zhou, et al. 2023. Larger language models do in-context learning differently.arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03846(2023)

  51. [51]

    Wei Wei, Xubin Ren, Jiabin Tang, Qinyong Wang, Lixin Su, Suqi Cheng, Junfeng Wang, Dawei Yin, and Chao Huang. 2024. Llmrec: Large language models with graph augmentation for recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM international conference on web search and data mining. 806–815

  52. [52]

    Yunjia Xi, Weiwen Liu, Jianghao Lin, Xiaoling Cai, Hong Zhu, Jieming Zhu, Bo Chen, Ruiming Tang, Weinan Zhang, and Yong Yu

  53. [53]

    InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems

    Towards open-world recommendation with knowledge augmentation from large language models. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. 12–22

  54. [54]

    Xiaohan Xu, Chongyang Tao, Tao Shen, Can Xu, Hongbo Xu, Guodong Long, Jian-Guang Lou, and Shuai Ma. 2024. Re-reading improves reasoning in large language models. InProceedings of the 2024 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 15549–15575. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2026. CFALR: Collaborative Filtering-Augme...

  55. [55]

    Yiyan Xu, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Yunshan Ma, Jizhi Zhang, and Xiangnan He. 2024. Diffusion models for generative outfit rec- ommendation. InProceedings of the 47th international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval. 1350–1359

  56. [56]

    An Yang, Anfeng Li, Baosong Yang, Beichen Zhang, Binyuan Hui, Bo Zheng, Bowen Yu, Chang Gao, Chengen Huang, Chenxu Lv, et al

  57. [57]

    Qwen3 technical report.arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.09388(2025)

  58. [58]

    Wenchuan Yang, Cheng Yang, Jichao Li, Yuejin Tan, Xin Lu, and Chuan Shi. 2024. Non-autoregressive personalized bundle generation. Information Processing & Management61, 5 (2024), 103814

  59. [59]

    Zhengyuan Yang, Linjie Li, Kevin Lin, Jianfeng Wang, Chung-Ching Lin, Zicheng Liu, and Lijuan Wang. 2023. The dawn of lmms: Preliminary explorations with gpt-4v (ision).arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.174219, 1 (2023), 1

  60. [60]

    Mingzhe Yu, Yunshan Ma, Lei Wu, Changshuo Wang, Xue Li, and Lei Meng. 2025. FashionDPO: fine-tune fashion outfit generation model using direct preference optimization. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 212–222

  61. [61]

    Wenhui Yu, Huidi Zhang, Xiangnan He, Xu Chen, Li Xiong, and Zheng Qin. 2018. Aesthetic-based clothing recommendation. In Proceedings of the 2018 world wide web conference. 649–658

  62. [62]

    Huijing Zhan, Jie Lin, Kenan Emir Ak, Boxin Shi, Ling-Yu Duan, and Alex C Kot. 2021. A3-FKG: Attentive Attribute-Aware Fashion Knowledge Graph for Outfit Preference Prediction.IEEE Transactions on Multimedia24 (2021), 819–831

  63. [63]

    Chao Zhang, Shiwei Wu, Haoxin Zhang, Tong Xu, Yan Gao, Yao Hu, and Enhong Chen. 2024. NoteLLM: A Retrievable Large Language Model for Note Recommendation. InCompanion Proceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. 170–179

  64. [64]

    Yang Zhang, Keqin Bao, Ming Yan, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2024. Text-like encoding of collaborative information in large language models for recommendation. InProceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 9181–9191

  65. [65]

    Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Jizhi Zhang, Keqin Bao, Qifan Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2025. Collm: Integrating collaborative embeddings into large language models for recommendation.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering(2025)

  66. [66]

    Zihuai Zhao, Yujuan Ding, Wenqi Fan, and Qing Li. 2025. WebRec: Enhancing LLM-based Recommendations with Attention-guided RAG from Web.arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.14182(2025)

  67. [67]

    Zihuai Zhao, Wenqi Fan, Jiatong Li, Yunqing Liu, Xiaowei Mei, Yiqi Wang, Zhen Wen, Fei Wang, Xiangyu Zhao, Jiliang Tang, et al. 2023. Recommender systems in the era of large language models (llms).arXiv preprint arXiv:2307.02046(2023)

  68. [68]

    Bowen Zheng, Yupeng Hou, Hongyu Lu, Yu Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Ming Chen, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2024. Adapting large language models by integrating collaborative semantics for recommendation. In2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE). IEEE, 1435–1448

  69. [69]

    Yaochen Zhu, Liang Wu, Qi Guo, Liangjie Hong, and Jundong Li. 2024. Collaborative large language model for recommender systems. InProceedings of the ACM on Web Conference 2024. 3162–3172. , Vol. 1, No. 1, Article . Publication date: June 2026