REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 1 cited by
Metric mean dimension of amenable group actions: localization and non-uniformity
T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3
Pith's one-line read The metric mean dimension of an amenable group action equals the asymptotic entropy of its pointwise ε-stable sets.
desk verdict Extends the localization formula to general amenable groups via the covering lemma and settles the uniformity questions with explicit counterexamples. read the letter →
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
The reading
What carries the argument
The localization formula that equates global metric mean dimension to the asymptotic entropy of pointwise ε-stable sets, which works by replacing tiling with Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma.
What would settle it
An amenable group action where the asymptotic entropy of pointwise ε-stable sets differs from the global metric mean dimension computed by other means would falsify the characterization.
Extended reading notes
Core claim
The global metric mean dimension equals the asymptotic entropy of pointwise ε-stable sets for actions of countable discrete amenable groups. This is proved by introducing equivalent definitions via topological entropy, packing topological entropy, and Bowen's dimensional entropy, using Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma in place of tiling arguments, and constructing counterexamples that show the supremum and limit superior cannot be interchanged in the localization formula.
Load-bearing premise
Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma suffices to replace tiling arguments when defining the equivalent entropy notions for general amenable groups.
Editorial extensions
If this is right
- Equivalent definitions via topological entropy, packing topological entropy, and Bowen's dimensional entropy provide flexible tools for computing metric mean dimension.
- The supremum and limit superior in the localization formula cannot generally be interchanged.
- The convergence appearing in the localization formula is heterogeneous.
- The three uniformity questions from Yang, Chen, and Zhou are resolved by explicit counterexamples.
Reading between the lines
- The same covering-lemma technique may allow localization formulas for other entropy-like invariants on amenable groups.
- Non-uniformity implies that pointwise dynamical features can dominate the value of global invariants even when averaged.
- The new definitions could simplify explicit calculations of metric mean dimension on concrete amenable actions such as shifts on groups with complicated Følner sequences.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper extends Tsukamoto's localization formula for metric mean dimension from ℤ^k- and ℝ^k-actions to actions of countable discrete amenable groups. The central result (Theorem 2.3) asserts that the global metric mean dimension equals the asymptotic entropy of pointwise ε-stable sets. Equivalent definitions of the invariant are introduced via topological entropy, packing topological entropy, and Bowen's dimensional entropy. Tiling arguments are replaced by Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma to handle general amenable groups. Counterexamples (Theorem 2.6 and Proposition 5.8) are constructed to resolve the three uniformity questions from Yang-Chen-Zhou, showing that the supremum and limsup in the localization formula cannot be interchanged in general.
Significance. If the claims hold, the work generalizes an important invariant to a substantially larger class of group actions, supplies multiple equivalent characterizations that may aid concrete computations, and settles open uniformity questions via explicit counterexamples. The adaptation of the combinatorial covering lemma, if verified to apply without extra conditions, constitutes a useful technical contribution for amenable-group dynamics.
major comments (1)
- [Theorem 2.3] Theorem 2.3: The assertion that Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma suffices to establish equivalence among the topological, packing, and Bowen formulations (and thereby the localization formula) for arbitrary countable discrete amenable groups is load-bearing; the proof must explicitly confirm that the lemma applies directly to the relevant Følner sequences without additional restrictions on the group or the action.
minor comments (2)
- The definitions of pointwise ε-stable sets and the three entropy variants should be stated in full before their first use in the statements of the main theorems.
- Notation for the amenable group, the metric, and the Følner sequences should be introduced uniformly at the beginning of Section 2 to avoid later ambiguity.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the careful reading and the positive evaluation of the manuscript. We address the single major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Theorem 2.3] Theorem 2.3: The assertion that Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma suffices to establish equivalence among the topological, packing, and Bowen formulations (and thereby the localization formula) for arbitrary countable discrete amenable groups is load-bearing; the proof must explicitly confirm that the lemma applies directly to the relevant Følner sequences without additional restrictions on the group or the action.
Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the lemma's hypotheses is necessary for the argument to be fully rigorous. In the revised version we will add a short paragraph immediately after the invocation of Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma in the proof of Theorem 2.3. This paragraph will record that the Følner sequences employed are chosen to satisfy the exact conditions stated in Lindenstrauss's lemma (in particular, the vanishing of the boundary-to-volume ratio) and that the argument imposes no further restrictions on either the amenable group or the continuous action. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The derivation chain relies on external results including Tsukamoto's localization formula, Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma, and counterexamples resolving questions from Yang-Chen-Zhou. Equivalent definitions via topological, packing, and Bowen's entropies are introduced as technical tools without reducing to self-fitted parameters or self-citations. Theorem 2.3 characterizes global metric mean dimension via asymptotic entropy of pointwise ε-stable sets using these independent inputs, with no load-bearing self-citation chains or ansatzes smuggled from prior author work. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks.
Assumptions & free parameters
assumptions (1)
- domain assumption Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma applies to countable discrete amenable groups and replaces tiling arguments
Cite this review
Pith. "Pith review of Metric mean dimension of amenable group actions: localization and non-uniformity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZAHH7ESR
@misc{pith2026260613270,
author = {Pith},
title = {Pith review of: Metric mean dimension of amenable group actions: localization and non-uniformity},
year = {2026},
howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZAHH7ESR}},
note = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.13270}
}
abstract
In this paper, we extend Tsukamoto's recent localization formula for metric mean dimension to actions of countable discrete amenable groups, which previously applied only to $\mathbb{R}^k$- and $\mathbb{Z}^k$-actions -- by proving that the global metric mean dimension is characterized by the asymptotic entropy of pointwise $\varepsilon$-stable sets (Theorem 2.3). To achieve this generalization, we introduce equivalent definitions of the invariant using topological entropy, packing topological entropy, and Bowen's dimensional entropy, respectively. A key technical contribution is our replacement of tiling arguments with Lindenstrauss's combinatorial covering lemma, which enables us to handle the general structure of amenable groups. Furthermore, we resolve all three questions regarding uniformity raised in Section 6 of a recent paper by Yang, Chen, and Zhou by constructing counterexamples (Theorem 2.6 and Proposition 5.8), which demonstrates that the supremum and limit superior in the localization formula cannot generally be interchanged, thereby highlighting the heterogeneous nature of the convergence. These results clarify the uniformity issue and offer insights into the link between local dynamics and global invariants, while our equivalent definitions provide flexible tools for computing metric mean dimension in concrete settings.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Dimensional entropy of amenable group actions over stable sets and fibres
Establishes characterizations of topological conditional entropy via dimensional entropy of stable sets and fibres for amenable group actions, with topological proofs generalizing prior work.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Entropy-expansive maps
Rufus Bowen. Entropy-expansive maps. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 164:323--331, 1972
1972
-
[2]
Zero-dimensional and symbolic extensions of topological flows
David Burguet and Ruxi Shi. Zero-dimensional and symbolic extensions of topological flows. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 42(3):1105--1126, 2022
2022
-
[3]
Variational principles for amenable metric mean dimensions
Ercai Chen, Dou Dou, and Dongmei Zheng. Variational principles for amenable metric mean dimensions. J. Differential Equations , 319:41--79, 2022
2022
-
[4]
Minimal subshifts of arbitrary mean topological dimension
Dou Dou. Minimal subshifts of arbitrary mean topological dimension. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. , 37(3):1411--1424, 2017
2017
-
[5]
New characterizations of topological conditional entropy for actions of amenable groups
Dou Dou, Ying Wang, and Guohua Zhang. New characterizations of topological conditional entropy for actions of amenable groups. Fund. Math. , 271(1):71--96, 2025
2025
-
[6]
Packing topological entropy for amenable group actions
Dou Dou, Dongmei Zheng, and Xiaomin Zhou. Packing topological entropy for amenable group actions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 43(2):480--514, 2023
2023
-
[7]
Mean dimension of Z ^k -actions
Yonatan Gutman, Elon Lindenstrauss, and Masaki Tsukamoto. Mean dimension of Z ^k -actions. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 26(3):778--817, 2016
2016
-
[8]
Application of signal analysis to the embedding problem of Z^k -actions
Yonatan Gutman, Yixiao Qiao, and Masaki Tsukamoto. Application of signal analysis to the embedding problem of Z^k -actions. Geom. Funct. Anal. , 29(5):1440--1502, 2019
2019
Show all 27 references
-
[9]
Topological invariants of dynamical systems and spaces of holomorphic maps
Misha Gromov. Topological invariants of dynamical systems and spaces of holomorphic maps. I . Math. Phys. Anal. Geom. , 2(4):323--415, 1999
1999
-
[10]
Embedding minimal dynamical systems into H ilbert cubes
Yonatan Gutman and Masaki Tsukamoto. Embedding minimal dynamical systems into H ilbert cubes. Invent. Math. , 221(1):113--166, 2020
2020
-
[11]
Embedding Z^k -actions in cubical shifts and Z^k -symbolic extensions
Yonatan Gutman. Embedding Z^k -actions in cubical shifts and Z^k -symbolic extensions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems , 31(2):383--403, 2011
2011
-
[12]
Metric mean dimension for algebraic actions of sofic groups
Ben Hayes. Metric mean dimension for algebraic actions of sofic groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 369(10):6853--6897, 2017
2017
-
[13]
Sofic mean dimension
Hanfeng Li. Sofic mean dimension. Adv. Math. , 244:570--604, 2013
2013
-
[14]
Amenable upper mean dimensions
Zhiming Li. Amenable upper mean dimensions. Anal. Math. Phys. , 11(3):Paper No. 99, 12, 2021
2021
-
[15]
Mean dimension, small entropy factors and an embedding theorem
Elon Lindenstrauss. Mean dimension, small entropy factors and an embedding theorem. Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. , (89):227--262 (2000), 1999
2000
-
[16]
Pointwise theorems for amenable groups
Elon Lindenstrauss. Pointwise theorems for amenable groups. Invent. Math. , 146(2):259--295, 2001
2001
-
[17]
Mean dimension, mean rank, and von N eumann-- L \"uck rank
Hanfeng Li and Bingbing Liang. Mean dimension, mean rank, and von N eumann-- L \"uck rank. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 739:207--240, 2018
2018
-
[18]
Mean topological dimension
Elon Lindenstrauss and Benjamin Weiss. Mean topological dimension. Israel J. Math. , 115:1--24, 2000
2000
-
[19]
Brody curves and mean dimension
Shinichiroh Matsuo and Masaki Tsukamoto. Brody curves and mean dimension. J. Amer. Math. Soc. , 28(1):159--182, 2015
2015
-
[20]
Radius of comparison and mean topological dimension: Z^d -actions
Zhuang Niu. Radius of comparison and mean topological dimension: Z^d -actions. Canad. J. Math. , 76(4):1240--1266, 2024
2024
-
[21]
Ornstein and Benjamin Weiss
Donald S. Ornstein and Benjamin Weiss. Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups. J. Analyse Math. , 48:1--141, 1987
1987
-
[22]
Mean dimension of the dynamical system of B rody curves
Masaki Tsukamoto. Mean dimension of the dynamical system of B rody curves. Invent. Math. , 211(3):935--968, 2018
2018
-
[23]
Remark on the local nature of metric mean dimension
Masaki Tsukamoto. Remark on the local nature of metric mean dimension. Kyushu J. Math. , 76(1):143--162, 2022
2022
-
[24]
Bowen's equations for upper metric mean dimension with potential
Rui Yang, Ercai Chen, and Xiaoyao Zhou. Bowen's equations for upper metric mean dimension with potential. Nonlinearity , 35(9):4905--4938, 2022
2022
-
[25]
Upper metric mean dimensions with potential of \( \)-stable sets
Rui Yang, Ercai Chen and Xiaoyao Zhou. Upper metric mean dimensions with potential of \( \)-stable sets. arXiv preprint , arXiv:2305.08330, 2024
2024
-
[26]
Entropy points and applications
Xiangdong Ye and Guohua Zhang. Entropy points and applications. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 359(12):6167--6186, 2007
2007
-
[27]
Bowen entropy for actions of amenable groups
Dongmei Zheng and Ercai Chen. Bowen entropy for actions of amenable groups. Israel J. Math. , 212(2):895--911, 2016
2016
Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.