Decay estimates for the two-dimensional Beam equation with potentials

Han Cheng; Shuangshuang Chen; Xiaohua Yao; Zijun Wan

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 49 references

Decay estimates for the two-dimensional Beam equation with potentials

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper maps every zero-energy resonance type of the two-dimensional operator Δ²+V to a sharp L¹→L^∞ decay rate for the beam equation, from 1/|t| all the way down to 1/log|t|.

desk verdict Completes the 2D beam-equation decay classification across all zero-energy threshold types; rates are sharp up to logs, with the main caveat being a genuine—but openly acknowledged—spectral assumption. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.16793 v2 pith:PIEWRAYZ submitted 2026-06-15 math.AP

Shuangshuang Chen , Han Cheng , Zijun Wan , Xiaohua Yao This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.AP MSC 35B4035L0535P25

keywords beamequationplatefourth-orderSchrödingeroperatorzero-energyresonancedecayestimatesbi-Laplacianthresholdsingularityoscillatoryintegrals

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to settle how fast solutions of the two-dimensional beam (plate) equation ∂²u + (Δ²+V)u = 0 disperse when a decaying real potential V is added. Restricting to the absolutely continuous part of H = Δ²+V, it claims a complete classification: if zero energy is a regular point or first-kind resonance, the propagators decay like 1/|t| — sharp, and improving to (|t| log|t|)⁻¹ in logarithmically weighted spaces; a second-kind resonance (the type the free bi-Laplacian itself has) with a nonvanishing trace moment ⟨|x|²V,φ⟩ degrades the rate to (log|t|)²/|t|; and a d-wave resonance at a third-kind zero or zero eigenvalue enforces the slowest rate, roughly 1/log|t|. A sympathetic reader would care because the map from threshold singularity to decay profile is claimed to be exact up to logarithmic factors across every zero-energy obstruction, and because the weighted estimates reveal a counterintuitive effect: the potential can cancel the free propagator's leading term, giving the perturbed sine evolution a logarithmic gain the unperturbed bi-Laplacian cannot reach.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the asymptotic expansion of the Birman–Schwinger operator M^±(λ)=U+vR₀^±(λ⁴)v near λ=0. Its inverse is expanded as Σ_{α,β} λ^{2−kα−kβ} Q_α M^±_{α,β}(λ) Q_β, where the projections Q_α implement moment cancellations (Q_α v = 0 for α≥1, etc.) that kill the most singular terms of the free resolvent. Substituted into Stone's formula, this reduces both propagators to finitely many canonical oscillatory integrals whose (σ,ν) parameters decide the decay: σ=0 with ν≤0 gives 1/|t|, σ=2 with ν>1 gives 1/(log|t|)^{ν−1}, and the intermediate (log|t|)²/|t| and 1/log|t| rates emerge from nonvanishing moment operators on the resonance subspaces, whose nontriviality is checked explicitly.

What would settle it

Take a compactly supported potential that makes zero a second-kind resonance with nonvanishing ⟨|x|²V,φ⟩ and measure the sine propagator's kernel: the paper predicts the sharp rate t⁻¹(log t)² with a specific amplitude (the operator A⁺−A⁻ of Proposition 6.4), so observing t⁻¹ or t⁻² would falsify it. Separately, use the known construction of smooth compactly supported V for which Δ²+V has a positive embedded eigenvalue while zero is an eigenvalue: the asserted decay estimates should break, since that hypothesis is load-bearing for the high-energy resolvent bounds.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For H = Δ²+V on the plane, the paper asserts that the decay of cos(t√H)P_ac(H) and sin(t√H)/(t√H)P_ac(H) is decided completely by the zero-energy structure of H: a regular point or first-kind resonance gives sharp decay ~1/|t|, improved to (|t| log|t|)⁻¹ in logarithmically weighted spaces; a second-kind resonance — the free bi-Laplacian's class — degrades to |t|⁻¹(log|t|)² whenever some resonance function has nonvanishing ⟨|x|²V,φ⟩, with vanishing moments restoring |t|⁻¹; and a d-wave resonance (third-kind threshold or zero eigenvalue) forces the slowest rate, ~(log|t|)⁻¹. Each rate is sharp up to logarithm factors.

Load-bearing premise

The analysis assumes, in every main theorem, that H = Δ²+V has no positive embedded eigenvalues (§1.4.1); this can genuinely fail for smooth compactly supported potentials in two dimensions, and the only sufficient condition offered — repulsive potentials, (x·∇)V ≤ 0 — excludes exactly the eigenvalue cases the theorems treat.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every zero-energy type of H maps to a stated, sharp decay rate: 1/|t| for regular points, first-kind resonances, and pure eigenvalues without p- or d-wave resonances; (log|t|)²/|t| for generic second-kind resonances; and (log|t|)⁻¹ once a d-wave resonance is present.
The algebraic conditions that separate rates — ⟨|x|²V,φ⟩ ≠ 0, vanishing ⟨x_ix_jV,φ⟩, complete isotropy of the fourth-order moments — are explicit functionals of V and the zero-energy states, so for a given potential the correct decay law can be read off in advance.
Because the free bi-Laplacian is itself a second-kind resonance, the free rate |t|⁻¹ is recovered only when the potential's projected moments vanish; otherwise the potential strictly slows the evolution, and in the d-wave case slows it dramatically to 1/log|t|.
In the regular and first-kind cases the potential cancels the free sine propagator's leading term 1/(8|t|)G₀, so the perturbed sine evolution decays at (|t| log|t|)⁻¹ in weighted spaces, strictly faster than the free operator's |t|⁻¹.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Read as a design rule: matching the potential's projected moments to zero (E = E₀, or E₂ = E₃, S₅L² = Ẽ₅L²) either restores or beats the free beam's decay, suggesting that localized structural defects could be engineered to damp plate vibrations at the optimal rate.
The paper's own remark that the cosine gain is tied to dimension n ≡ 2 (mod 4) suggests the classification scheme should extend to bi-Laplacian-type operators in dimensions six, ten, and so on, with new power laws and logarithmic factors.
If the no-positive-eigenvalues hypothesis fails, the t⁻¹(log t)² and (log t)⁻¹ bounds describe only the absolutely continuous part; a complete theory of the full evolution would require controlling the spectral measure at embedded eigenvalues, which the present resolvent method does not address.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper completes the last open case in the beam-equation dispersive program: dimension two, with every zero-energy threshold type classified. If the resolvent machinery holds, the result is the full map—|t|^{-1} for regular/first-kind, |t|^{-1}(log|t|)^2 for generic second-kind, (log|t|)^{-1} for d-wave/third-kind, with refined weighted bounds in the eigenvalue case. The lower bounds are tested against explicit resonance functions, so the rates are genuinely sharp up to logs rather than fitted.

What is actually new: this is the first treatment of Δ^2+V in 2D covering all threshold singularities, and it exposes phenomena the free case does not have—notably the perturbed sine propagator picking up a logarithmic gain in weighted spaces, and the (log|t|)^{-1} d-wave bottleneck. The architecture is coherent: Stone's formula, Birman–Schwinger reduction, a carefully structured resolvent expansion (Theorem 2.7), and oscillatory lemmas that reduce every case to a canonical form. Sixty-one pages is not padding; the deferred proofs in Sections 8–10 are real work. I found no internal contradiction and no circularity.

Soft spots, in proportion. First, the no-positive-embedded-eigenvalues hypothesis in every main theorem. It is genuine, it is needed (the ac-projection and the high-energy resolvent bounds both break without it), and it is not automatic: [22] constructs C_0^∞ potentials with positive eigenvalues in every dimension, inside the potential class considered here. The paper is honest about this—§1.4.1 states it plainly and cites both the counterexample and the repulsive sufficient condition—but that repulsive condition cannot certify the zero-eigenvalue endpoint of Theorems 1.7/1.8, where zero itself is an L^2 eigenvalue. So “complete picture” is slightly stronger than what is established; the theorems are correct as conditionals, and the residual gap is a genuine open spectral question rather than an error. Second, Lemma 7.6, which carries the Q_5=0 expansion, is asserted with “we omit the details.” Given it follows the Theorem 2.7 template this is a minor issue, but it is the one spot I would want tightened. Third, the core lemmas are dense and the paper leans heavily on prior machinery from [38], a co-authored paper. That is normal in this line of work, but independent checking of Theorem 2.7 and Lemmas 2.8–2.9 would be the responsible referee task.

Who gets value: anyone working on fourth-order dispersive estimates, threshold resonances, or the Schrödinger-with-resonances literature. The classification alone is worth having. I would send it to referees: the contribution is important, the derivation is structured, and the concerns are tightening items, not demonstrated errors.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper establishes time-decay estimates for the two-dimensional beam (plate) equation ∂²_t u + (Δ²+V)u = 0, for real decaying potentials V, for the absolutely-continuous parts of the propagators cos(t√H) and sin(t√H)/(t√H), H = Δ²+V. The central claim is a complete threshold classification: zero regular or first-kind resonance gives sharp |t|^{-1} bounds in L¹→L^∞ and (|t|log|t|)^{-1} in L¹_ω→L^∞_{−ω} (Theorem 1.2); second-kind resonance gives generically (log|t|)²/|t|, improving to free-like bounds when second-order moment tensors vanish (Theorem 1.4); third-kind resonance or d-wave gives the slow rate ∼(log|t|)^{-1} (Theorem 1.7); and a pure zero eigenvalue without d-wave gives |t|^{-1}, with weighted |t|^{-1} or (|t|log|t|)^{-1} dictated by isotropy of the fourth-order moment tensor (Theorem 1.8). The proofs use Stone's formula, the Birman–Schwinger identity, a nine-section machinery of resolvent expansions near zero (Theorem 2.7), kernel estimates for projected free resolvents (Lemma 2.8), and oscillatory-integral bounds (Lemma 2.9). All main theorems assume that H has no positive embedded eigenvalues.

Significance. If correct, this is a strong and genuinely hard result: dimension two is the difficult even-dimensional case for higher-order operators, with logarithmic singularities and a nontrivial intrinsic zero resonance of Δ², and the paper assigns each threshold singularity type a sharp (up to log corrections) decay profile, including weighted improvements and matching lower bounds. The paper's strengths are its explicitness and self-containment: the algebraic conditions (moment tensors, subspaces E, E₀, E₂, E₃, \tilde{S}_5) are checkable; the deferred Sections 8–10 contain the resonance classification, the (M±(λ))^{-1} expansions, and the oscillatory-integral machinery; and the lower bounds are obtained from explicit test functions built from resonance states (Propositions 6.4, 6.8, 7.5). The conditional theorems are derived coherently, and I found no internal inconsistency in the conditional statements. The main reservation — the unverified no-positive-embedded-eigenvalue hypothesis for the zero-eigenvalue endpoint — concerns the scope of the 'complete picture' claim rather than the internal logic of the proofs.

major comments (2)

[§1.4.1; Theorems 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8] All four main theorems assume H = Δ²+V has no positive embedded eigenvalues; this is structurally required (Lemma 4.3, imported from [23, Thm 2.23], and the Stone-formula reduction to P_ac(H) both need it). §1.4.1 concedes this hypothesis is not automatic: [22, §7.1] constructs C₀^∞ potentials with positive eigenvalues in every n≥1, inside the class (μ>11). The only sufficient condition given, (x·∇)V ≤ 0, excludes all eigenvalues, so it cannot certify the hypothesis in the eigenvalue cases of Theorems 1.7/1.8. The 'complete picture ... covering all possible threshold singularities' (abstract; §1.1) is thus not established as stated: for the zero-eigenvalue endpoint no instance satisfying the hypotheses is exhibited. Please supply a sufficient condition compatible with a zero eigenvalue, verify the endpoint, or rescope the completeness claim.
[§7.2, Lemma 7.6] Lemma 7.6 states the expansion of (M±(λ))^{-1} when Q₅ = 0 (zero eigenvalue without d-wave resonance) and underpins all of Theorem 7.2, including the refined expansions used in Proposition 7.8 and Lemma 7.9. Its proof is omitted ('follows by an argument analogous to that in the proof of Theorem 2.7'). The Q₅ = 0 case is not a cosmetic restriction: the block D₂,₂ degenerates, and the entries M±_{6,0}, M±_{0,6}, M±_{6,6} acquire the specific λ- and logλ-powers recorded in Lemma 7.6 (including the Q₄ = 0 subcase), powers that determine whether the operator eB in (7.15) vanishes and hence the S₅ = \tilde{S}_5 dichotomy in Theorem 7.2(2). Since Theorem 2.7 occupied all of Section 9, the omitted details are load-bearing; at least a sketch of the matrix inversion with the dominant entries should be supplied.

minor comments (4)

[§1.2] The notation 'O(f(t)) refers to an operator satisfying ∥O(f(t))∥_{L¹_ω→L^∞_{−ω}} ≲ |f(t)|' overloads the standard scalar big-O. This makes statements such as 'O(|t|^{-1})' ambiguous at the operator level. A distinct symbol (e.g., a script O or a named class) would improve readability.
[Remark 1.3] The claim that the weighted bound (1.6) 'is strictly sharp' is prefaced by 'we believe' and no matching lower bound for the perturbed weighted estimate is proved in the regular/first-kind case. Either prove the lower bound or label it a conjecture; the abstract's 'sharp L¹→L^∞ estimates' for (1.5) is, in contrast, justified by the free comparison.
[References; Lemmas 2.1, 4.3] Lemma 2.1 is quoted from [38, Lemma 2.2] and Lemma 4.3 from [23, Thm 2.23], both with overlapping authorship with the present paper. Since the O₂-remainder in (2.4)–(2.7) and the high-energy bound feed directly into Lemmas 2.8/2.9 and Section 4, a sentence verifying that the imported hypotheses (potential decay range, no positive eigenvalues) match the present setting would be useful. Also, [29] appears in the bibliography without an obvious in-text citation.
[Throughout] Presentation issues: the text contains typographical slips such as 'W e begin' at the opening of Section 5 and irregular spacing in several displayed formulas (notably in the abstract). A careful proofreading pass is advised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the decay rates are consequences of explicit resolvent expansions and Stone's formula; the few self-cited technical lemmas are parameter-free tools with assumptions independent of the target estimates.

full rationale

The chain of derivation is self-contained at the level that matters for circularity. The solution operators are expressed by Stone's formula (Section 1.5, eqs. for cos(t√H)P_ac(H) and sin(t√H)/(t√H)P_ac(H)), and the proofs reduce to (i) the free resolvent expansion (Lemma 2.1, quoted from [38, Lemma 2.2]), (ii) the new asymptotic expansion of (M±(λ))^{-1} (Theorem 2.7, proved in Section 9 from the free expansion and cancellation properties of the projections Q_α), and (iii) oscillatory integral bounds (Lemma 2.9, proved in Section 10). The imported self-cited results — Lemma 2.1 ([38]), Lemma 10.1 ([38, Lem 3.5]) and Lemma 4.3 ([23, Thm 2.23]) — are technical lemmas with stated assumptions that do not include the beam-equation decay rates they help prove; they are not used to define the target rates or to force a uniqueness conclusion. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, and no theorem is equivalent by construction to a moment or resonance definition; the lower bounds test explicit resonance functions supplied by the hypothesis. The main qualification is the hypothesis, repeated in Theorems 1.2, 1.4, 1.7 and 1.8, that H has no positive embedded eigenvalues. Section 1.4.1 explicitly states: 'For any n≥1, one can construct V∈C_0^∞(R^n) such that H possesses positive eigenvalues (see Feng et al. [22, Section 7.1])', and the sufficient condition offered, (x·∇)V≤0, 'then H has no eigenvalues'. Thus the 'complete picture' claim is conditional on a spectral property that can fail within the potential class and is not certified for the zero-eigenvalue endpoints. That is a genuine limitation of the theorem's scope, but not a circular reduction: the conditional estimates still follow from the resolvent expansions rather than from the assumption. Overall, there is no definitional, fitted-input, or self-citation-based circularity in the derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 10 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Free parameters: none — nothing is numerically fitted; all constants (a₀^± = ±i/8, b₀ = 1/(8π), b₁ = 1/(4608π), …) come from Bessel/Hankel expansions. The moment conditions (⟨x_ix_jV,φ⟩=0, isotropy of T_ijkl) are hypotheses defining sub-cases, and the decay exponents μ>11/14/18/22 and cutoff λ₀ are technical hypotheses, not fitted values. Axioms: the ten listed; the two most load-bearing are the no-positive-embedded-eigenvalues assumption (domain assumption; incompatible with the cited sufficient condition in the eigenvalue cases) and the imported free-resolvent expansion (Lemma 2.1 = [38, Lemma 2.2], self-cited but parameter-free). Invented entities: none — the S_j/Q_j projections and resonance functions φ are mathematical bookkeeping with no new physical content.

assumptions (10)

domain assumption H = Δ²+V has no positive embedded eigenvalues (stated in Theorems 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8).
Required for the Stone-formula/ac-projection framework and the positive-energy resolvent bounds of Lemma 4.3 (via [23, Thm 2.23]). Non-trivial: §1.4.1 notes positive eigenvalues occur for some C₀^∞ V in all dimensions (Feng–Soffer–Yao [22, §7.1]); the cited sufficient condition (repulsive V) precludes all eigenvalues and so cannot certify the eigenvalue/d-wave cases of Theorems 1.7/1.8.
standard math Free resolvent expansion of Δ² (Lemma 2.1, quoted from Li–Soffer–Yao [38, Lemma 2.2]).
Hankel/Bessel series plus the spectral splitting R₀(z) = (2√z)⁻¹((−Δ−√z)⁻¹ − (−Δ+√z)⁻¹). Underlies every resolvent and kernel expansion, including (2.4)–(2.7) and Lemma 2.8.
standard math Limiting absorption principle for (−Δ−z)⁻¹ (Agmon [2]).
Defines R₀^±(λ⁴): L^{2,s}→L^{2,−s} for s>1/2 (Section 2.1), used throughout the Stone-formula manipulations.
standard math Directional Taylor expansion lemma (Lemma 10.1 = [38, Lemma 3.5]).
Engine of the cancellation structure for Q_αvR₀^±(λ⁴) in Lemma 2.8; without it the zero-energy singularities of the free resolvent cannot be extracted as explicit powers of λ.
standard math Positive-energy resolvent bounds for R_V^± (Lemma 4.3 = [23, Theorem 2.23]).
Used in Section 4 for the high-energy part; inherits the no-positive-eigenvalues assumption.
domain assumption Potential decay hypotheses |V(x)| ≲ ⟨x⟩^{−μ} with μ>11, 14, 18, 22 (Theorems 1.2, 1.4, 1.7, 1.8).
Needed for the moment conditions of Definitions 1.1/2.2, the kernel bounds (2.21)–(2.25) of Lemma 2.8, and Proposition 8.1; the required strength grows with the order of the resonance treated.
standard math Fredholm/Riesz theory: T₀ = U + b₀vG₀²v is a compact perturbation of U (vG₀²v Hilbert–Schmidt), so projections S_j, Q_j are finite rank (Definition 2.2).
Justifies the finite-dimensional algebra in the (M±(λ))⁻¹ inversion (Section 9) and the resonance classification.
standard math Schur-complement/inversion algebra (Lemmas 9.1, 9.2 from [33, Lemma 3.12] and [34, Lemma 2.3]).
Basis for the block inversions of the operator matrix representing M±(λ) in the proof of Theorem 2.7.
standard math Kato–Rellich self-adjointness of H = Δ²+V on H⁴(R²) (Section 1.1).
Gives the self-adjoint functional calculus used to define cos(t√H) and P_ac(H).
standard math Standard oscillatory-integral tools (Van der Corput lemma, integration by parts; Stein [47]).
Used in Lemma 2.9 and Lemma 10.3 to extract |t|⁻¹, |t|^{−1+σ/2}(log t)^{−ν}, and explicit log-decay asymptotics from ∫cos(tλ²)λ^a(log λ)^b dλ-type integrals.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Decay estimates for the two-dimensional Beam equation with potentials." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PIEWRAYZ

@misc{pith2026260616793,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Decay estimates for the two-dimensional Beam equation with potentials},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PIEWRAYZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.16793}
}

abstract

This paper establishes time decay estimates for the following two-dimensional beam (plate) equation with a decaying real-valued potential $V$: \begin{equation*} \partial_t^2 u + (\Delta^2 + V) u = 0, \qquad u(0,x)=f(x),\quad \partial_t u(0,x)=g(x). \end{equation*} When zero is a regular point or a first-kind resonance of $H=\Delta^2+V$, we first prove sharp $L^1\to L^\infty$ estimates for the solution operators: \begin{align*} \left\|\cos(t\sqrt{H})P_{\mathrm{ac}}(H)\right\|_{L^1\to L^\infty} + \left\|\frac{\sin(t\sqrt{H})}{t\sqrt{H}}P_{\mathrm{ac}}(H)\right\|_{L^1\to L^\infty} \lesssim \frac{1}{|t|}, \end{align*} and obtain an enhanced decay $(|t|\log|t|)^{-1}$ in logarithmically weighted spaces $L^1_\omega\to L^\infty_{-\omega}$ with $\omega(x)=\log(2+|x|)$. For second-kind resonances of $H$ (the bi-Laplacian $\Delta^2$ belongs to this class), a non-zero trace moment $\langle |x|^2V,\phi\rangle\neq0$ for some second-kind resonance function $\phi$ induces severe threshold singularities, worsening the $L^1\to L^\infty$ estimate to $|t|^{-1}(\log|t|)^2$. Finally, for third-kind resonances or a zero eigenvalue, we prove that the presence of $d$-wave resonance leads to the worst $L^1\to L^\infty$ decay rate $\sim(\log|t|)^{-1}$. Several improved estimates are also obtained without a $d$-wave resonance. In particular, in the pure eigenvalue case (i.e., neither $d$-wave nor $p$-wave resonance), both propagators recover the optimal unweighted $L^1\to L^\infty$ estimate $|t|^{-1}.$

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

[22]

H. Feng, A. Soffer, Z. Wu, X. Yao,Decay estimates for higher-order elliptic operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,373 (2020), no. 4, 2805–2859

2020
[38]

P. Li, A. Soffer, X. Yao,Decay estimates for fourth-order Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two, J. Funct. Anal.,284 (2023), no. 6, 109816

2023
[1]

Abramowitz, I

M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, vol. 55, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.,
[2]

Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory, Ann

S. Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci., (4)2 (1975), no. 2, 151–218

1975
[3]

Beals,OptimalL ∞ decay for solutions to the wave equation with a potential, Comm

M. Beals,OptimalL ∞ decay for solutions to the wave equation with a potential, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 19(1994), no. 7–8, 1319–1369

1994
[4]

Beals, W

M. Beals, W. Strauss,L p estimates for the wave equation with a potential, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,18 (1993), no. 7–8, 1365–1397

1993
[5]

Beceanu, M

M. Beceanu, M. Goldberg,Strichartz estimates and maximal operators for the wave equation inR 3, J. Funct. Anal.,266 (2014), no. 3, 1476–1510

2014
[6]

N. Burq, F. Planchon, J. Stalker, A. Tahvildar-Zadeh,Strichartz estimates for the wave and Schr¨ odinger equations with the inverse-square potential, J. Funct. Anal.,203(2003), no. 2, 519–549

2003

Show all 49 references

[7]

N. Burq, F. Planchon, J. Stalker, A. Tahvildar-Zadeh,Strichartz estimates for the wave and Schr¨ odinger equations with potentials of critical decay, Indiana Univ. Math. J.,53(2004), no. 6, 1665–1680

2004
[8]

Cardoso, G

F. Cardoso, G. Vodev,Optimal dispersive estimates for the wave equation withC n−3 2 potentials in dimensions4≤n≤7, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,37(2012), no. 1, 88–124

2012
[9]

M. Chen, P. Li, A. Soffer, X. Yao,Decay estimates for Beam equations with potential in dimension three, J. Funct. Anal., 288(2025), no. 1, 110671

2025
[10]

S. Chen, Z. Wan, X. Yao,Decay estimates for beam equations with potentials on the line, J. Differential Equations,439 (2025), 113418

2025
[11]

Cheng, A

H. Cheng, A. Soffer, Z. Wu, X. Yao,TheL p-boundedness of wave operators for higher order Schr¨ odinger operator with zero singularities in low odd dimensions, arXiv e-prints, (2025), arXiv:2505.07009v1

2025 arXiv
[12]

D’Ancona, V

P. D’Ancona, V. Pierfelice,On the wave equation with a large rough potential, J. Funct. Anal.,227(2005), no. 1, 30–77

2005
[13]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, M. Goldberg, W. R. Green,Dispersive estimates for four dimensional Schr¨ odinger and wave equations with obstructions at zero energy, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,39(2014), no. 10, 1936–1964

2014
[14]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, M. Goldberg, W. R. Green,Counterexamples toL p boundedness of wave operators for classical and higher order Schr¨ odinger operators, J. Funct. Anal.,285(2023), no. 5, 108789

2023
[15]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, M. Goldberg, W. R. Green,Dispersive estimates for higher order Schr¨ odinger operators with scaling-critical potentials, Math. Ann.,392(2025), no. 2, 2225—2252

2025
[16]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green,A weighted dispersive estimate for Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two, Comm. Math. Phys.,319(2013), 791–811

2013
[17]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green,Dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two with obstructions at zero energy, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,365(2013), no. 12, 6403–6440

2013
[18]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green,TheL p-continuity of wave operator for higher order Schr¨ odinger operators, Adv. Math., 404(2022), 108450

2022
[19]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green,A note on endpointLp-continuity of wave operators for classical and higher order Schr¨ odinger operators, J. Differential Equations,355(2023), 144–161

2023
[20]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green, K. LaMaster,L p-continuity of wave operators for higher order Schr¨ odinger operators with threshold eigenvalues in high dimensions, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst.,45(2025), no. 9, 3258–3274

2025
[21]

M. B. Erdo˘ gan, W. R. Green, E. Toprak,On the fourth order Schr¨ odinger equation in three dimensions: dispersive estimates and zero energy resonance, J. Differential Equations,217(2021), 152–185

2021
[23]

H. Feng, A. Soffer, X. Yao,Decay estimates and Strichartz estimates of fourth-order Schr¨ odinger operator, J. Funct. Anal., 274(2018), no. 2, 605–658

2018
[24]

Froese, I

R. Froese, I. Herbst, M. H. Ostenhof,On the absence of positive eigenvalues for one-body Schr¨ odinger operators, J. Anal. Math.,41(1982), 272–284. 62 SHUANGSHUANG CHEN, HAN CHENG, ZIJUN W AN AND XIAOHUA YAO †

1982
[25]

Galtbayar, K

A. Galtbayar, K. Yajima,TheL p-boundedness of wave operators for fourth order Schr¨ odinger operators onR4, J. Spectr. Theory,14(2024), no. 1, 271–354

2024
[26]

Georgiev, N

V. Georgiev, N. Visciglia,Decay estimates for wave equation with potential, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,28 (2003), no. 7–8, 1325–1369

2003
[27]

Ginibre, G

J. Ginibre, G. Velo,Generalized Strichartz inequalities for the wave equation, J. Funct. Anal.,133(1995), no. 1, 50–68

1995
[28]

Goldberg, W

M. Goldberg, W. R. Green,On theL p boundedness of the wave operators for fourth order Schr¨ odinger operator, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,374(2021), no. 6, 4075–4092

2021
[29]

Goldberg, M

M. Goldberg, M. Visan,A counterexample to dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators in higher dimensions, Comm. Math. Phys.,266(2006), 211-238

2006
[30]

W. R. Green,Time decay estimates for the wave equation with potential in dimension two, J. Differential Equations,257 (2014), no. 2, 868–919

2014
[31]

W. R. Green, E. Toprak,On the fourth order Schr¨ odinger equation on four dimensions: Dispersive estimates and zero energy resonances, J. Differential Equations,267(2019), no. 3, 1899–1954

2019
[32]

A. D. Ionescu, D. Jerison,On the absence of positive eigenvalues of Schr¨ odinger operators with rough potentials, Geom. Funct. Anal.,13(2003), no. 5, 1029–1081

2003
[33]

Jensen, T

A. Jensen, T. Kato,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and time-decay of the wave functions, Duke Math. J.,46 (1979), no. 3, 583–611

1979
[34]

Jensen, G

A. Jensen, G. Nenciu,A unified approach to resolvent expansions at thresholds, Rev. Math. Phys.,13(2001), no. 6, 717–754

2001
[35]

Kato,Growth properties of solutions of the reduced wave equation with a variable coefficient, Comm

T. Kato,Growth properties of solutions of the reduced wave equation with a variable coefficient, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 12(1959), 403–425

1959
[36]

H. Koch, D. Tataru,Carleman estimates and absence of embedded eigenvalues, Comm. Math. Phys.,267(2006), no. 2, 419–449

2006
[37]

Kopylova,Dispersive estimates for the 2D wave equation, Russ

E. Kopylova,Dispersive estimates for the 2D wave equation, Russ. J. Math. Phys.,17(2010), no. 2, 226–239

2010
[39]

Marshall, W

B. Marshall, W. Strauss, S. Wainger,L p −L q estimates for the Klein-Gordon equation, J. Math. Pures Appl., (9)59 (1980), no. 4, 417–440

1980
[40]

Mizutani, Z

H. Mizutani, Z. Wan, X. Yao,Counterexamples and weak(1,1)estimates of wave operators for fourth-order Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension three, J. Spectr. Theory,14(2024), no. 4, 1409–1450

2024
[41]

Mizutani, Z

H. Mizutani, Z. Wan, X. Yao,L p-boundedness of wave operators for bi-Schr¨ odinger operators on the line, Adv. Math., 451(2024), 109806

2024
[42]

Mizutani, Z

H. Mizutani, Z. Wan, X. Yao,L p-boundedness of wave operators for fourth order Schr¨ odinger operators with zero reso- nances onR 3, J. Funct. Anal.,289(2025), no. 8, 111013

2025
[43]

Moulin,High frequency dispersive estimates in dimension two, Ann

S. Moulin,High frequency dispersive estimates in dimension two, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e,10(2009), no. 2, 415–428

2009
[44]

Schlag,Dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two, Comm

W. Schlag,Dispersive estimates for Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two, Comm. Math. Phys.,257(2005), no. 1, 87–117

2005
[45]

Simon,On positive eigenvalues of one-body Schr¨ odinger operators, Comm

B. Simon,On positive eigenvalues of one-body Schr¨ odinger operators, Comm. Pure Appl. Math.,22(1969), 531-538

1969
[46]

Soffer, Z

A. Soffer, Z. Wu, X. Yao,Decay estimates for bi-Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension one, Ann. Henri Poincar´ e,23(2022), 2683–2744

2022
[47]

E. M. Stein,Harmonic analysis: real-variable methods, orthogonality, and oscillatory integrals, Princeton Mathematical Series, vol. 43, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1993. With the assistance of Timothy S. Murphy, Monographs in Harmonic Analysis, III

1993
[48]

Strauss,Nonlinear Wave Equations, CBMS Reg

W. Strauss,Nonlinear Wave Equations, CBMS Reg. Conf. Ser. Math. Vol. 73, AMS, Providence, RI, 1989. Shuangshuang Chen, Department of Mathematics, Central China Normal University, Wuhan, 430079, P.R. China Email address:chenss@mails.ccnu.edu.cn Han Cheng, Institute of Applied P...

1989
[1964]

For sale by Superintendent of Documents

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [22]

H. Feng, A. Soffer, Z. Wu, X. Yao,Decay estimates for higher-order elliptic operators, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.,373 (2020), no. 4, 2805–2859

2020

[2] [38]

P. Li, A. Soffer, X. Yao,Decay estimates for fourth-order Schr¨ odinger operators in dimension two, J. Funct. Anal.,284 (2023), no. 6, 109816

2023

[3] [1]

Abramowitz, I

M. Abramowitz, I. A. Stegun,Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables, National Bureau of Standards Applied Mathematics Series, vol. 55, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.,

[4] [2]

Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory, Ann

S. Agmon,Spectral properties of Schr¨ odinger operators and scattering theory, Ann. Scuola Norm. Sup. Pisa Cl. Sci., (4)2 (1975), no. 2, 151–218

1975

[5] [3]

Beals,OptimalL ∞ decay for solutions to the wave equation with a potential, Comm

M. Beals,OptimalL ∞ decay for solutions to the wave equation with a potential, Comm. Partial Differential Equations, 19(1994), no. 7–8, 1319–1369

1994

[6] [4]

Beals, W

M. Beals, W. Strauss,L p estimates for the wave equation with a potential, Comm. Partial Differential Equations,18 (1993), no. 7–8, 1365–1397

1993

[7] [5]

Beceanu, M

M. Beceanu, M. Goldberg,Strichartz estimates and maximal operators for the wave equation inR 3, J. Funct. Anal.,266 (2014), no. 3, 1476–1510

2014

[8] [6]

N. Burq, F. Planchon, J. Stalker, A. Tahvildar-Zadeh,Strichartz estimates for the wave and Schr¨ odinger equations with the inverse-square potential, J. Funct. Anal.,203(2003), no. 2, 519–549

2003