Understanding the non-Gaussian nature of Galactic foreground emissions towards small scales

Changbom Park; Dmitri Pogosyan; Fazlu Rahman; Kevin Huffenberger; Pravabati Chingangbam; Tarun Souradeep; Tuhin Ghosh

arxiv: 2606.22596 · v1 · pith:3MWU3DPXnew · submitted 2026-06-21 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · astro-ph.GA

Understanding the non-Gaussian nature of Galactic foreground emissions towards small scales

Fazlu Rahman , Pravabati Chingangbam , Kevin Huffenberger , Tuhin Ghosh , Dmitri Pogosyan , Tarun Souradeep , Changbom Park This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 09:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO astro-ph.GA

keywords Galactic foregroundsnon-GaussianityMinkowski Functionalskurtosisthermal dustforeground modelingcosmic microwave backgroundsmall-scale statistics

0 comments

The pith

Galactic foreground emissions exhibit a universal non-Gaussian nature dominated by excess kurtosis that remains stable across angular scales.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper conducts a multi-scale analysis of non-Gaussianity in Galactic foregrounds using Minkowski Functionals and generalized skewness-kurtosis parameters. It establishes that every component studied shares the same kurtosis-dominated signature whose form holds steady from large to small scales even though the underlying emission physics differs substantially. Comparisons with dust models show that PySM reproduces the global kurtosis amplitude and scale dependence while a filament-based model underpredicts the signals and PySM itself fails to capture observed regional variations. Simple PDF toy models trace the universal kurtosis to the joint effect of heavy-tailed one-point distributions and steep spatial correlations. The results supply a statistical test for validating foreground models needed in future CMB analyses.

Core claim

All foreground components studied exhibit a remarkably universal non-Gaussian nature dominated by excess kurtosis, whose shape remains stable across angular scales despite large differences in emission physics. GNILC and PySM match closely at the global level over reliable scales, while the filament-based model yields weaker skewness and kurtosis; PySM shows statistically significant patch-to-patch differences in kurtosis. The universal signature arises from heavy-tailed one-point statistics combined with steep large-scale spatial correlations, with detailed amplitude and scale dependence set by the specific foreground physics.

What carries the argument

Minkowski Functionals and generalized skewness-kurtosis parameters that measure morphological and statistical departures from Gaussianity at multiple angular scales.

If this is right

Excess kurtosis functions as a robust statistical fingerprint that identifies Galactic foregrounds at small scales.
State-of-the-art models such as PySM reproduce the overall amplitude and scale dependence but miss the observed spatial variability of the kurtosis signal.
The combination of heavy-tailed one-point PDFs and steep spatial correlations is sufficient to produce the observed universal kurtosis signature.
The same kurtosis measures supply a practical validation framework for small-scale foreground models required by next-generation CMB experiments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the kurtosis signature proves universal across frequencies, it could serve as an additional prior in component-separation algorithms to reduce foreground residuals in CMB maps.
The stability across scales suggests that the underlying interstellar turbulence or filamentary structure imposes a common statistical imprint that might be modeled with fewer free parameters than current approaches.
Applying the same Minkowski and kurtosis analysis to simulated skies with varying turbulence strengths would test whether the signature can be used to constrain physical parameters of the interstellar medium.

Load-bearing premise

The GNILC reconstruction and the chosen model realizations can be compared directly without residual systematics that would alter the measured kurtosis amplitude or its scale dependence.

What would settle it

A statistically significant change in the shape or scale dependence of the kurtosis signal in independent high-resolution maps at the same frequencies where GNILC is reliable would falsify the claimed universality and stability.

read the original abstract

We present a unified, multi-scale study of non-Gaussianity of Galactic foreground emissions using Minkowski Functionals and generalized skewness-kurtosis parameters, focusing on the characterization of small-scale non-Gaussianity and its underlying physical origin. We find that all foreground components studied exhibit a remarkably universal non-Gaussian nature dominated by excess kurtosis, whose shape remains stable across angular scales despite large differences in emission physics. Focusing on thermal dust, we perform a detailed comparison between observed maps (GNILC and Planck 545 GHz) and dust model realizations (PySM and filament-based models) to assess the performance of state-of-the-art models in reproducing the observed non-Gaussian properties. At the global level, GNILC and PySM display closely matched kurtosis behavior over the angular scales where the GNILC reconstruction is reliable, while the filament-based model produces substantially weaker skewness and kurtosis signals. For PySM, however, a patch-based analysis reveals statistically significant regional variations, indicating that while the model reproduces the overall non-Gaussian amplitude and scale dependence, it does not fully capture the spatial variability of the observed kurtosis signal. Using simple PDF-based toy models, we demonstrate that the universal kurtosis signature arises from the combination of heavy-tailed one-point statistics and steep large-scale spatial correlations, while its detailed amplitude and scale dependence depend on the underlying foreground physics. These results identify excess kurtosis as a robust statistical fingerprint of Galactic foregrounds and provide a practical framework for validating small-scale foreground models for future CMB analyses.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper finds a universal excess-kurtosis signature across foreground components that holds across scales, with PySM matching globally but not regionally, though GNILC systematics remain unquantified.

read the letter

The two things to take away are that all the foreground components show a common excess-kurtosis behavior whose shape stays roughly constant with scale, and that PySM reproduces the average amplitude while missing the spatial patch-to-patch scatter seen in the GNILC maps.

The work applies Minkowski functionals together with generalized skewness and kurtosis to the same set of maps at multiple scales. The global comparison between GNILC 545 GHz, Planck, PySM, and the filament model is straightforward and shows the filament model under-producing the moments. The PDF toy models then give a clear account of how heavy tails plus large-scale correlations produce the kurtosis dominance. That combination is useful for anyone who needs a quick statistical check on small-scale foreground behavior.

The main soft spot is the lack of any propagated uncertainty from the GNILC reconstruction itself. The abstract notes that GNILC is used only where reliable, but kurtosis is outlier-sensitive, so even modest scale-dependent residuals from separation or filtering could stabilize or inflate the reported shape. Without a quantitative test of that effect, the claim that the universality is intrinsic to the physics rather than partly reconstruction-driven rests on an assumption that is not checked in the provided text.

The paper is aimed at people who build or validate foreground models for CMB analyses at small scales. Readers who already work with moment-based or Minkowski statistics on real maps will get the most out of the comparisons and the toy-model section. It is coherent enough on its own terms, with clear methods and falsifiable claims, to deserve referee time.

I would send it to review, with the referee asked to focus on whether the GNILC error budget has been propagated into the kurtosis results.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-scale analysis of non-Gaussianity in Galactic foreground emissions using Minkowski Functionals and generalized skewness-kurtosis parameters. It reports that all studied components display a universal non-Gaussian character dominated by excess kurtosis whose shape is stable across angular scales. For thermal dust, global comparisons show GNILC and PySM maps yield closely matched kurtosis behavior where GNILC is reliable, while a filament-based model underpredicts the signals; patch-based analysis reveals that PySM captures overall amplitude but not spatial variability. PDF-based toy models are used to attribute the kurtosis signature to heavy-tailed one-point statistics combined with steep large-scale correlations.

Significance. If the GNILC-model comparisons survive quantitative scrutiny of reconstruction residuals, the work would usefully identify excess kurtosis as a stable statistical fingerprint for validating small-scale foreground models in CMB analyses. The inclusion of toy models that connect the observed moments to underlying PDF and correlation properties is a clear strength, providing a physical interpretation that can be tested against future data.

major comments (1)

[Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that GNILC and PySM 'display closely matched kurtosis behavior' is presented without a quantitative propagation of possible scale-dependent residuals (incomplete separation, noise leakage, or filtering artifacts) into the generalized kurtosis estimator. Because kurtosis is outlier-sensitive, even modest residuals could alter the reported amplitude and scale dependence, directly affecting the universality claim that rests on these comparisons.

minor comments (1)

The abstract refers to 'generalized skewness-kurtosis parameters' without an explicit definition or formula; providing the precise estimator (including any normalization or weighting) at first use would improve accessibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. The single major comment raises a valid point about the presentation of the GNILC–PySM comparison in the abstract. We address it directly below and will incorporate a revision to improve clarity and caution.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that GNILC and PySM 'display closely matched kurtosis behavior' is presented without a quantitative propagation of possible scale-dependent residuals (incomplete separation, noise leakage, or filtering artifacts) into the generalized kurtosis estimator. Because kurtosis is outlier-sensitive, even modest residuals could alter the reported amplitude and scale dependence, directly affecting the universality claim that rests on these comparisons.

Authors: We agree that the abstract statement would benefit from an explicit qualifier regarding residuals. The manuscript already restricts the comparison to angular scales where GNILC is stated to be reliable (based on the GNILC team’s published residual assessments) and notes that the filament model underpredicts the signal. However, we did not propagate residual uncertainties quantitatively into the kurtosis estimator itself. We will revise the abstract to read that GNILC and PySM “display closely matched kurtosis behavior over the angular scales where the GNILC reconstruction is reliable, within the limits set by published residual characterizations.” We will also add a short paragraph in the results section discussing the outlier sensitivity of kurtosis and the robustness checks already performed via the reliability masks. A full end-to-end residual propagation is not feasible without access to the complete GNILC residual maps, which are not public; the revision therefore qualifies rather than quantitatively recomputes the estimator. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical map-model comparisons with external estimators

full rationale

The paper performs direct numerical comparisons of observed GNILC/Planck maps against external PySM and filament models using Minkowski functionals and generalized skewness-kurtosis statistics. No equations, parameters, or self-citations reduce the reported kurtosis amplitudes or scale dependence to quantities defined inside the paper; the universality claim rests on the external data products and models rather than any fitted input renamed as prediction or self-referential definition. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The statistical measures are treated as standard tools whose validity is assumed.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Minkowski functionals and generalized skewness-kurtosis parameters are sufficient to characterize the non-Gaussian properties of interest
Standard assumption in the field but not derived or justified within the provided abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5834 in / 1224 out tokens · 22017 ms · 2026-06-26T09:44:43.582553+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

[1]

Remazeilles, C

M. Remazeilles, C. Dickinson, H.K.K. Eriksen and I.K. Wehus,Sensitivity and foreground modelling for large-scale cosmic microwave background B-mode polarization satellite missions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.458(2016) 2032 [1509.04714]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[2]

D. Beck, J. Errard and R. Stompor,Impact of Polarized Galactic Foreground Emission on CMB Lensing Reconstruction and Delensing of B-Modes,JCAP06(2020) 030 [2001.02641]

arXiv 2020
[3]

Hertig, K

E. Hertig, K. Wolz, T. Namikawa, A. Baleato Lizancos, S. Azzoni and A. Challinor,The Simons Observatory: Combining delensing and foreground cleaning for improved constraints on inflation, in 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology, 5, 2024 [2405.13201]. [4]CMB-S4collaboration,CMB-S4: Foreground-cleaning Pipeline Comparison for Measuring Primordial Gravita...

arXiv 2024
[4]

Liu et al.,The Simons Observatory: assessing the impact of dust complexity on the recovery of primordial B-modes,JCAP11(2025) 024 [2508.00073]

Y. Liu et al.,The Simons Observatory: assessing the impact of dust complexity on the recovery of primordial B-modes,JCAP11(2025) 024 [2508.00073]

arXiv 2025
[5]

Thorne, J

B. Thorne, J. Dunkley, D. Alonso and S. Næss,The Python Sky Model: software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society469(2017) 2821 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/469/3/2821/17638902/stx949.pdf]

2017
[6]

Remazeilles, C

M. Remazeilles, C. Dickinson, A.J. Banday, M.A. Bigot-Sazy and T. Ghosh,An improved source-subtracted and destriped 408-MHz all-sky map,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.451(2015) 4311 [1411.3628]. [9]Pan-Experiment Galactic Science Groupcollaboration,Full-sky Models of Galactic Microwave Emission and Polarization at Sub-arcminute Scales for the Python Sky M...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[7]

Hervías-Caimapo and K.M

C. Hervías-Caimapo and K.M. Huffenberger,Full-sky, Arcminute-scale, 3D Models of Galactic Microwave Foreground Dust Emission Based on Filaments,Astrophys. J.928(2022) 65 [2107.08317]

arXiv 2022
[8]

Krachmalnicoff and G

N. Krachmalnicoff and G. Puglisi,ForSE: A GAN-based Algorithm for Extending CMB Foreground Models to Subdegree Angular Scales,Astrophys. J.911(2021) 42 [2011.02221]

arXiv 2021
[9]

Irfan,Simulating a full-sky high resolution Galactic synchrotron spectral index map using neural networks,MNRAS520(2023) 6070 [2302.07301]

M.O. Irfan,Simulating a full-sky high resolution Galactic synchrotron spectral index map using neural networks,MNRAS520(2023) 6070 [2302.07301]

arXiv 2023
[10]

J. Yao, N. Krachmalnicoff, M. Foschi, G. Puglisi and C. Baccigalupi,FORSE+: Simulating non-Gaussian CMB foregrounds at 3 arcmin in a stochastic way based on a generative adversarial network,Astron. Astrophys.686(2024) A290 [2406.14519]. – 25 – 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Vk( A) Synchrotron V0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 V1 200 0 200 V2 0.02 0.00 0.02 Vk/VG, max...

arXiv 2024
[11]

Abril-Cabezas, F.J

I. Abril-Cabezas, F.J. Qu, B.D. Sherwin, A. van Engelen, N. MacCrann, C. Hervías-Caimapo et al., Impact of Galactic non-Gaussian foregrounds on CMB lensing measurements,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023522 [2505.03737]

arXiv 2025
[12]

Burigana, L

C. Burigana, L. La Porta, W. Reich, P. Reich, J. Gonzalez-Nuevo, M. Massardi et al.,Polarized synchrotron emission,PoSCMB2006(2006) 016 [astro-ph/0607469]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006
[13]

Miville-Deschenes, G

M.A. Miville-Deschenes, G. Lagache, F. Boulanger and J.L. Puget,Statistical properties of dust far-infrared emission,Astron. Astrophys.469(2007) 595 [0704.2175]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007
[14]

Lazarian and D

A. Lazarian and D. Pogosyan,Statistical Description of Synchrotron Intensity Fluctuations: Studies of Astrophysical Magnetic Turbulence,Astrophys. J.747(2012) 5 [1105.4617]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[15]

Mertsch and S

P. Mertsch and S. Sarkar,Loops and spurs: The angular power spectrum of the Galactic synchrotron – 26 – background,JCAP06(2013) 041 [1304.1078]. [19]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. XI. Polarized dust foregrounds,Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A11 [1801.04945]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[16]

Martire, R.B

F.A. Martire, R.B. Barreiro and E. Martínez-González,Characterization of the polarized synchrotron emission from Planck and WMAP data,JCAP2022(2022) 003 [2110.12803]

arXiv 2022
[17]

Stalpes, D.C

K.A. Stalpes, D.C. Collins and K.M. Huffenberger,Planck Dust Polarization Power Spectra Are Consistent with Strongly Supersonic Turbulence,ApJ972(2024) 26 [2404.02874]

arXiv 2024
[18]

Ben-David, S

A. Ben-David, S. von Hausegger and A.D. Jackson,Skewness and kurtosis as indicators of non-Gaussianity in galactic foreground maps,JCAP2015(2015) 019 [1509.03100]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[19]

G. Jung, B. Racine and B. van Tent,The bispectra of galactic CMB foregrounds and their impact on primordial non-Gaussianity estimation,JCAP2018(2018) 047 [1810.01727]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[20]

S. Rana, T. Ghosh, J.S. Bagla and P. Chingangbam,Non-Gaussianity of diffuse Galactic synchrotron emission at 408 MHz,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.481(2018) 970 [1806.01565]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018
[21]

Coulton and D.N

W.R. Coulton and D.N. Spergel,The bispectrum of polarized galactic foregrounds,JCAP10(2019) 056 [1901.04515]

arXiv 2019
[22]

von Hausegger, A

S. von Hausegger, A. Gammelgaard Ravnebjerg and H. Liu,Statistical properties of polarized CMB foreground maps,MNRAS487(2019) 5814 [1811.02470]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019
[23]

Allys, F

E. Allys, F. Levrier, S. Zhang, C. Colling, B.R.-S. Blancard, F. Boulanger et al.,The RWST, a comprehensive statistical description of the non-Gaussian structures in the ISM,Astron. Astrophys. 629(2019) A115 [1905.01372]

arXiv 2019
[24]

Saydjari, S.K.N

A.K. Saydjari, S.K.N. Portillo, Z. Slepian, S. Kahraman, B. Burkhart and D.P. Finkbeiner, Classification of Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations Using Wavelet Scattering Transforms,ApJ910 (2021) 122 [2010.11963]

arXiv 2021
[25]

Delouis, E

J.M. Delouis, E. Allys, E. Gauvrit and F. Boulanger,Non-Gaussian modelling and statistical denoising of Planck dust polarisation full-sky maps using scattering transforms,Astron. Astrophys.668(2022) A122 [2207.12527]

arXiv 2022
[26]

Adler,The Geometry of Random Fields, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2010), 10.1137/1.9780898718980, [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898718980]

R.J. Adler,The Geometry of Random Fields, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2010), 10.1137/1.9780898718980, [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898718980]

work page doi:10.1137/1.9780898718980 2010
[27]

Tomita,Curvature Invariants of Random Interface Generated by Gaussian Fields,Progress of Theoretical Physics76(1986) 952

H. Tomita,Curvature Invariants of Random Interface Generated by Gaussian Fields,Progress of Theoretical Physics76(1986) 952

1986
[28]

Mecke, T

K.R. Mecke, T. Buchert and H. Wagner,Robust morphological measures for large-scale structure in the Universe,Astron. Astrophys.288(1994) 697 [astro-ph/9312028]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994
[29]

J.R.I. Gott, C. Park, R. Juszkiewicz, W.E. Bies, D.P. Bennett, F.R. Bouchet et al.,Topology of Microwave Background Fluctuations: Theory,Astrophys. J.352(1990) 1

1990
[30]

Matsubara and J

T. Matsubara and J. Yokoyama,Genus statistics of the large scale structure with nonGaussian density fields,Astrophys. J.463(1996) 409 [astro-ph/9509086]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996
[31]

Schmalzing and T

J. Schmalzing and T. Buchert,Beyond Genus Statistics: A Unifying Approach to the Morphology of Cosmic Structure,Astrophys. J. Lett.482(1997) L1 [astro-ph/9702130]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997
[32]

Naselsky and D.I

P.D. Naselsky and D.I. Novikov,General Statistical Properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Field,ApJ507(1998) 31 [astro-ph/9801285]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[33]

Dolgov, A.G

A.D. Dolgov, A.G. Doroshkevich, D.I. Novikov and I.D. Novikov,Geometry and Statistics of Cosmic Microwave Polarization,International Journal of Modern Physics D8(1999) 189 [astro-ph/9901399]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999
[34]

Matsubara,Statistics of Smoothed Cosmic Fields in Perturbation Theory

T. Matsubara,Statistics of Smoothed Cosmic Fields in Perturbation Theory. I. Formulation and Useful Formulae in Second-Order Perturbation Theory,Astrophys. J.584(2003) 1

2003
[35]

Pogosyan, C

D. Pogosyan, C. Pichon and C. Gay,Non-Gaussian extrema counts for CMB maps,PRD84(2011) 083510 [1107.1863]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011
[36]

C. Gay, C. Pichon and D. Pogosyan,Non-Gaussian statistics of critical sets in 2D and 3D: Peaks, voids, saddles, genus, and skeleton,PRD85(2012) 023011 [1110.0261]. – 27 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[37]

Schmalzing and K.M

J. Schmalzing and K.M. Gorski,Minkowski functionals used in the morphological analysis of cosmic microwave background anisotropy maps,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.297(1998) 355 [astro-ph/9710185]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998
[38]

Chingangbam and C

P. Chingangbam and C. Park,Statistical nature of non-Gaussianity from cubic order primordial perturbations: CMB map simulations and genus statistic,JCAP2009(2009) 019 [0908.1696]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[39]

Hikage and T

C. Hikage and T. Matsubara,Limits on second-order non-Gaussianity from Minkowski functionals of WMAP 7-year data,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.425(2012) 2187 [1207.1183]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012
[40]

Ganesan, P

V. Ganesan, P. Chingangbam, K.P. Yogendran and C. Park,Primordial non-Gaussian signatures in CMB polarization,JCAP2015(2015) 028 [1411.5256]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[41]

Chingangbam, V

P. Chingangbam, V. Ganesan, K.P. Yogendran and C. Park,On Minkowski Functionals of CMB polarization,Physics Letters B771(2017) 67 [1705.04454]. [46]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A7 [1906.02552]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017
[42]

Carones, J

A. Carones, J. CarrónDuque, J. Carrón Duque, D. Marinucci, M. Migliaccio and N. Vittorio, Minkowski functionals of CMB polarization intensity with pynkowski: theory and application to Planck and future data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2024) 756 [2211.07562]

arXiv 2024
[43]

Bashir, N

M. Bashir, N. S, P. Chingangbam, F. Rahman, P. Goyal, S. Appleby et al.,Local patch analysis of ACT DR6 convergence map using morphological statistics,2503.17849

arXiv
[44]

Sabyr, J.C

A. Sabyr, J.C. Hill and Z. Haiman,Constraining cosmology with thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich maps: Minkowski functionals, peaks, minima, and moments,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 103536 [2410.21247]

arXiv 2025
[45]

Chen, J.C

S.-F. Chen, J.C. Hill and Z. Haiman,Probing Cosmology through Higher-Order CMB Lensing Statistics, 2603.12335

arXiv
[46]

C.-G. Park, C. Park, B. Ratra and M. Tegmark,Gaussianity of Degree-Scale Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Observations,ApJ556(2001) 582 [astro-ph/0102406]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001
[47]

C.-G. Park, C. Park and B. Ratra,Effects of Foreground Contamination on the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Measured by MAP,ApJ568(2002) 9 [astro-ph/0107004]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002
[48]

Chingangbam and C

P. Chingangbam and C. Park,Residual foreground contamination in the WMAP data and bias in non-Gaussianity estimation,JCAP2013(2013) 031 [1210.2250]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013
[49]

Seta, P.J

A. Seta, P.J. Bushby, A. Shukurov and T.S. Wood,Saturation mechanism of the fluctuation dynamo at PrM ≥1,Physical Review Fluids5(2020) 043702 [2003.07997]

arXiv 2020
[50]

Rahman, P

F. Rahman, P. Chingangbam and T. Ghosh,The nature of non-Gaussianity and statistical isotropy of the 408 MHz Haslam synchrotron map,JCAP07(2021) 026 [2104.00419]

arXiv 2021
[51]

Rahman, P

F. Rahman, P. Chingangbam and T. Ghosh,Statistical properties of galactic synchrotron temperature and polarization maps — a multi-frequency comparison,JCAP01(2024) 036 [2212.06076]

arXiv 2024
[52]

Martire, A.J

F.A. Martire, A.J. Banday, E. Martínez-González and R.B. Barreiro,Morphological analysis of the polarized synchrotron emission with WMAP and Planck,JCAP04(2023) 049 [2301.08041]

arXiv 2023
[53]

Kalberla and U

P.M.W. Kalberla and U. Haud,Aspect ratios of far-infrared and H I filaments in the diffuse interstellar medium at high Galactic latitudes,A&A673(2023) A101 [2303.16183]

arXiv 2023
[54]

Ranucci, A

C. Ranucci, A. Carones, L. Vacher, N. Krachmalnicoff and C. Baccigalupi,B-sure I: Minkowski functionals as robustness test for tensor-to-scalar ratio detection from CMB observations,2510.18868

arXiv
[55]

Puglisi, A

G. Puglisi, A. Anand and M. Migliaccio,Extending Galactic foreground emission with neural networks, 2604.16167

Pith/arXiv arXiv
[57]

Adam, P.A.R

Planck Collaboration, R. Adam, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M.I.R. Alves, M. Arnaud et al.,Planck 2015 results. X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps,A&A594(2016) A10 [1502.01588]. – 28 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[58]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and frequency maps,A&A641(2020) A3 [1807.06207]

arXiv 2018
[59]

Matsubara,Analytic Minkowski functionals of the cosmic microwave background: Second-order non-Gaussianity with bispectrum and trispectrum,Phys

T. Matsubara,Analytic Minkowski functionals of the cosmic microwave background: Second-order non-Gaussianity with bispectrum and trispectrum,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 083505 [1001.2321]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010
[60]

Pogosyan, C

D. Pogosyan, C. Gay and C. Pichon,Invariant joint distribution of a stationary random field and its derivatives: Euler characteristic and critical point counts in 2 and 3D,PRD80(2009) 081301 [0907.1437]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009
[61]

Matsubara and S

T. Matsubara and S. Kuriki,Weakly non-Gaussian formula for the Minkowski functionals in general dimensions,arXiv e-prints(2020) arXiv:2011.04954 [2011.04954]

arXiv 2020
[62]

Miville-Deschênes and G

M.-A. Miville-Deschênes and G. Lagache,IRIS: A New Generation of IRAS Maps,ApJS157(2005) 302 [astro-ph/0412216]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[63]

Meisner and D.P

A.M. Meisner and D.P. Finkbeiner,A Full-sky, High-resolution Atlas of Galactic 12µm Dust Emission with WISE,ApJ781(2014) 5 [1312.0947]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014
[64]

Ben Bekhti, L

HI4PI Collaboration, N. Ben Bekhti, L. Flöer, R. Keller, J. Kerp, D. Lenz et al.,HI4PI: A full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS,A&A594(2016) A116 [1610.06175]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016
[65]

Finkbeiner,A Full-Sky HαTemplate for Microwave Foreground Prediction,ApJS146(2003) 407 [astro-ph/0301558]

D.P. Finkbeiner,A Full-Sky HαTemplate for Microwave Foreground Prediction,ApJS146(2003) 407 [astro-ph/0301558]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003
[66]

A. Nath, T. Ghosh, P. Chingangbam, V. Pelgrims and F. Rahman.Unveiling the physical properties of galactic synchrotron emission using statistical tools, in prep
[67]

Huffenberger and U

K.M. Huffenberger and U. Seljak,Prospects for ACT: Simulations, power spectrum, and non-Gaussian analysis,New Astron.10(2005) 491 [astro-ph/0408066]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005
[68]

Hervías-Caimapo, A.J

C. Hervías-Caimapo, A.J. Cukierman, P. Diego-Palazuelos, K.M. Huffenberger and S.E. Clark, Modeling parity-violating spectra in Galactic dust polarization with filaments and its applications to cosmic birefringence searches,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083532 [2408.06214]

arXiv 2025
[69]

Y. Hu, K.H. Yuen and A. Lazarian,Predictions of Cosmic Microwave Background Foregrounds Dust Polarization Using Velocity Gradients,1910.05637

arXiv 1910
[70]

Wang, J.-F

R.-Y. Wang, J.-F. Zhang, F. Lu and F.-Y. Xiang,Exploring the intermittency of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence by synchrotron polarization radiation,Astron. Astrophys.691(2024) A26 [2409.05739]

arXiv 2024
[71]

Williamson, J

V. Williamson, J. Sunseri, Z. Slepian, J. Hou and A. Greco,First Measurements of the 4-Point Correlation Function of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence as a Novel Probe of the Interstellar Medium, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2412.03967 [2412.03967]

arXiv 2024
[72]

Zonca, L

A. Zonca, L. Singer, D. Lenz, M. Reinecke, C. Rosset, E. Hivon et al.,healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python,Journal of Open Source Software 4(2019) 1298

2019
[73]

Alonso, J

D. Alonso, J. Sanchez, A. Slosar and L.D.E.S. Collaboration,A unified pseudo-Cℓ framework,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484(2019) 4127 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/484/3/4127/27747342/stz093.pdf]. – 29 –

2019

[1] [1]

Remazeilles, C

M. Remazeilles, C. Dickinson, H.K.K. Eriksen and I.K. Wehus,Sensitivity and foreground modelling for large-scale cosmic microwave background B-mode polarization satellite missions,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.458(2016) 2032 [1509.04714]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[2] [2]

D. Beck, J. Errard and R. Stompor,Impact of Polarized Galactic Foreground Emission on CMB Lensing Reconstruction and Delensing of B-Modes,JCAP06(2020) 030 [2001.02641]

arXiv 2020

[3] [3]

Hertig, K

E. Hertig, K. Wolz, T. Namikawa, A. Baleato Lizancos, S. Azzoni and A. Challinor,The Simons Observatory: Combining delensing and foreground cleaning for improved constraints on inflation, in 58th Rencontres de Moriond on Cosmology, 5, 2024 [2405.13201]. [4]CMB-S4collaboration,CMB-S4: Foreground-cleaning Pipeline Comparison for Measuring Primordial Gravita...

arXiv 2024

[4] [4]

Liu et al.,The Simons Observatory: assessing the impact of dust complexity on the recovery of primordial B-modes,JCAP11(2025) 024 [2508.00073]

Y. Liu et al.,The Simons Observatory: assessing the impact of dust complexity on the recovery of primordial B-modes,JCAP11(2025) 024 [2508.00073]

arXiv 2025

[5] [5]

Thorne, J

B. Thorne, J. Dunkley, D. Alonso and S. Næss,The Python Sky Model: software for simulating the Galactic microwave sky,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society469(2017) 2821 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/469/3/2821/17638902/stx949.pdf]

2017

[6] [6]

Remazeilles, C

M. Remazeilles, C. Dickinson, A.J. Banday, M.A. Bigot-Sazy and T. Ghosh,An improved source-subtracted and destriped 408-MHz all-sky map,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.451(2015) 4311 [1411.3628]. [9]Pan-Experiment Galactic Science Groupcollaboration,Full-sky Models of Galactic Microwave Emission and Polarization at Sub-arcminute Scales for the Python Sky M...

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[7] [7]

Hervías-Caimapo and K.M

C. Hervías-Caimapo and K.M. Huffenberger,Full-sky, Arcminute-scale, 3D Models of Galactic Microwave Foreground Dust Emission Based on Filaments,Astrophys. J.928(2022) 65 [2107.08317]

arXiv 2022

[8] [8]

Krachmalnicoff and G

N. Krachmalnicoff and G. Puglisi,ForSE: A GAN-based Algorithm for Extending CMB Foreground Models to Subdegree Angular Scales,Astrophys. J.911(2021) 42 [2011.02221]

arXiv 2021

[9] [9]

Irfan,Simulating a full-sky high resolution Galactic synchrotron spectral index map using neural networks,MNRAS520(2023) 6070 [2302.07301]

M.O. Irfan,Simulating a full-sky high resolution Galactic synchrotron spectral index map using neural networks,MNRAS520(2023) 6070 [2302.07301]

arXiv 2023

[10] [10]

J. Yao, N. Krachmalnicoff, M. Foschi, G. Puglisi and C. Baccigalupi,FORSE+: Simulating non-Gaussian CMB foregrounds at 3 arcmin in a stochastic way based on a generative adversarial network,Astron. Astrophys.686(2024) A290 [2406.14519]. – 25 – 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Vk( A) Synchrotron V0 0.0 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 V1 200 0 200 V2 0.02 0.00 0.02 Vk/VG, max...

arXiv 2024

[11] [11]

Abril-Cabezas, F.J

I. Abril-Cabezas, F.J. Qu, B.D. Sherwin, A. van Engelen, N. MacCrann, C. Hervías-Caimapo et al., Impact of Galactic non-Gaussian foregrounds on CMB lensing measurements,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 023522 [2505.03737]

arXiv 2025

[12] [12]

Burigana, L

C. Burigana, L. La Porta, W. Reich, P. Reich, J. Gonzalez-Nuevo, M. Massardi et al.,Polarized synchrotron emission,PoSCMB2006(2006) 016 [astro-ph/0607469]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

[13] [13]

Miville-Deschenes, G

M.A. Miville-Deschenes, G. Lagache, F. Boulanger and J.L. Puget,Statistical properties of dust far-infrared emission,Astron. Astrophys.469(2007) 595 [0704.2175]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

[14] [14]

Lazarian and D

A. Lazarian and D. Pogosyan,Statistical Description of Synchrotron Intensity Fluctuations: Studies of Astrophysical Magnetic Turbulence,Astrophys. J.747(2012) 5 [1105.4617]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[15] [15]

Mertsch and S

P. Mertsch and S. Sarkar,Loops and spurs: The angular power spectrum of the Galactic synchrotron – 26 – background,JCAP06(2013) 041 [1304.1078]. [19]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. XI. Polarized dust foregrounds,Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020) A11 [1801.04945]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[16] [16]

Martire, R.B

F.A. Martire, R.B. Barreiro and E. Martínez-González,Characterization of the polarized synchrotron emission from Planck and WMAP data,JCAP2022(2022) 003 [2110.12803]

arXiv 2022

[17] [17]

Stalpes, D.C

K.A. Stalpes, D.C. Collins and K.M. Huffenberger,Planck Dust Polarization Power Spectra Are Consistent with Strongly Supersonic Turbulence,ApJ972(2024) 26 [2404.02874]

arXiv 2024

[18] [18]

Ben-David, S

A. Ben-David, S. von Hausegger and A.D. Jackson,Skewness and kurtosis as indicators of non-Gaussianity in galactic foreground maps,JCAP2015(2015) 019 [1509.03100]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[19] [19]

G. Jung, B. Racine and B. van Tent,The bispectra of galactic CMB foregrounds and their impact on primordial non-Gaussianity estimation,JCAP2018(2018) 047 [1810.01727]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[20] [20]

S. Rana, T. Ghosh, J.S. Bagla and P. Chingangbam,Non-Gaussianity of diffuse Galactic synchrotron emission at 408 MHz,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.481(2018) 970 [1806.01565]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

[21] [21]

Coulton and D.N

W.R. Coulton and D.N. Spergel,The bispectrum of polarized galactic foregrounds,JCAP10(2019) 056 [1901.04515]

arXiv 2019

[22] [22]

von Hausegger, A

S. von Hausegger, A. Gammelgaard Ravnebjerg and H. Liu,Statistical properties of polarized CMB foreground maps,MNRAS487(2019) 5814 [1811.02470]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

[23] [23]

Allys, F

E. Allys, F. Levrier, S. Zhang, C. Colling, B.R.-S. Blancard, F. Boulanger et al.,The RWST, a comprehensive statistical description of the non-Gaussian structures in the ISM,Astron. Astrophys. 629(2019) A115 [1905.01372]

arXiv 2019

[24] [24]

Saydjari, S.K.N

A.K. Saydjari, S.K.N. Portillo, Z. Slepian, S. Kahraman, B. Burkhart and D.P. Finkbeiner, Classification of Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations Using Wavelet Scattering Transforms,ApJ910 (2021) 122 [2010.11963]

arXiv 2021

[25] [25]

Delouis, E

J.M. Delouis, E. Allys, E. Gauvrit and F. Boulanger,Non-Gaussian modelling and statistical denoising of Planck dust polarisation full-sky maps using scattering transforms,Astron. Astrophys.668(2022) A122 [2207.12527]

arXiv 2022

[26] [26]

Adler,The Geometry of Random Fields, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2010), 10.1137/1.9780898718980, [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898718980]

R.J. Adler,The Geometry of Random Fields, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2010), 10.1137/1.9780898718980, [https://epubs.siam.org/doi/pdf/10.1137/1.9780898718980]

work page doi:10.1137/1.9780898718980 2010

[27] [27]

Tomita,Curvature Invariants of Random Interface Generated by Gaussian Fields,Progress of Theoretical Physics76(1986) 952

H. Tomita,Curvature Invariants of Random Interface Generated by Gaussian Fields,Progress of Theoretical Physics76(1986) 952

1986

[28] [28]

Mecke, T

K.R. Mecke, T. Buchert and H. Wagner,Robust morphological measures for large-scale structure in the Universe,Astron. Astrophys.288(1994) 697 [astro-ph/9312028]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

[29] [29]

J.R.I. Gott, C. Park, R. Juszkiewicz, W.E. Bies, D.P. Bennett, F.R. Bouchet et al.,Topology of Microwave Background Fluctuations: Theory,Astrophys. J.352(1990) 1

1990

[30] [30]

Matsubara and J

T. Matsubara and J. Yokoyama,Genus statistics of the large scale structure with nonGaussian density fields,Astrophys. J.463(1996) 409 [astro-ph/9509086]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

[31] [31]

Schmalzing and T

J. Schmalzing and T. Buchert,Beyond Genus Statistics: A Unifying Approach to the Morphology of Cosmic Structure,Astrophys. J. Lett.482(1997) L1 [astro-ph/9702130]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

[32] [32]

Naselsky and D.I

P.D. Naselsky and D.I. Novikov,General Statistical Properties of the Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Field,ApJ507(1998) 31 [astro-ph/9801285]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[33] [33]

Dolgov, A.G

A.D. Dolgov, A.G. Doroshkevich, D.I. Novikov and I.D. Novikov,Geometry and Statistics of Cosmic Microwave Polarization,International Journal of Modern Physics D8(1999) 189 [astro-ph/9901399]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

[34] [34]

Matsubara,Statistics of Smoothed Cosmic Fields in Perturbation Theory

T. Matsubara,Statistics of Smoothed Cosmic Fields in Perturbation Theory. I. Formulation and Useful Formulae in Second-Order Perturbation Theory,Astrophys. J.584(2003) 1

2003

[35] [35]

Pogosyan, C

D. Pogosyan, C. Pichon and C. Gay,Non-Gaussian extrema counts for CMB maps,PRD84(2011) 083510 [1107.1863]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

[36] [36]

C. Gay, C. Pichon and D. Pogosyan,Non-Gaussian statistics of critical sets in 2D and 3D: Peaks, voids, saddles, genus, and skeleton,PRD85(2012) 023011 [1110.0261]. – 27 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[37] [37]

Schmalzing and K.M

J. Schmalzing and K.M. Gorski,Minkowski functionals used in the morphological analysis of cosmic microwave background anisotropy maps,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.297(1998) 355 [astro-ph/9710185]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

[38] [38]

Chingangbam and C

P. Chingangbam and C. Park,Statistical nature of non-Gaussianity from cubic order primordial perturbations: CMB map simulations and genus statistic,JCAP2009(2009) 019 [0908.1696]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[39] [39]

Hikage and T

C. Hikage and T. Matsubara,Limits on second-order non-Gaussianity from Minkowski functionals of WMAP 7-year data,Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc.425(2012) 2187 [1207.1183]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

[40] [40]

Ganesan, P

V. Ganesan, P. Chingangbam, K.P. Yogendran and C. Park,Primordial non-Gaussian signatures in CMB polarization,JCAP2015(2015) 028 [1411.5256]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[41] [41]

Chingangbam, V

P. Chingangbam, V. Ganesan, K.P. Yogendran and C. Park,On Minkowski Functionals of CMB polarization,Physics Letters B771(2017) 67 [1705.04454]. [46]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VII. Isotropy and Statistics of the CMB,Astron. Astrophys.641(2020) A7 [1906.02552]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

[42] [42]

Carones, J

A. Carones, J. CarrónDuque, J. Carrón Duque, D. Marinucci, M. Migliaccio and N. Vittorio, Minkowski functionals of CMB polarization intensity with pynkowski: theory and application to Planck and future data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.527(2024) 756 [2211.07562]

arXiv 2024

[43] [43]

Bashir, N

M. Bashir, N. S, P. Chingangbam, F. Rahman, P. Goyal, S. Appleby et al.,Local patch analysis of ACT DR6 convergence map using morphological statistics,2503.17849

arXiv

[44] [44]

Sabyr, J.C

A. Sabyr, J.C. Hill and Z. Haiman,Constraining cosmology with thermal Sunyaev-Zel’dovich maps: Minkowski functionals, peaks, minima, and moments,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 103536 [2410.21247]

arXiv 2025

[45] [45]

Chen, J.C

S.-F. Chen, J.C. Hill and Z. Haiman,Probing Cosmology through Higher-Order CMB Lensing Statistics, 2603.12335

arXiv

[46] [46]

C.-G. Park, C. Park, B. Ratra and M. Tegmark,Gaussianity of Degree-Scale Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Observations,ApJ556(2001) 582 [astro-ph/0102406]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

[47] [47]

C.-G. Park, C. Park and B. Ratra,Effects of Foreground Contamination on the Cosmic Microwave Background Anisotropy Measured by MAP,ApJ568(2002) 9 [astro-ph/0107004]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

[48] [48]

Chingangbam and C

P. Chingangbam and C. Park,Residual foreground contamination in the WMAP data and bias in non-Gaussianity estimation,JCAP2013(2013) 031 [1210.2250]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

[49] [49]

Seta, P.J

A. Seta, P.J. Bushby, A. Shukurov and T.S. Wood,Saturation mechanism of the fluctuation dynamo at PrM ≥1,Physical Review Fluids5(2020) 043702 [2003.07997]

arXiv 2020

[50] [50]

Rahman, P

F. Rahman, P. Chingangbam and T. Ghosh,The nature of non-Gaussianity and statistical isotropy of the 408 MHz Haslam synchrotron map,JCAP07(2021) 026 [2104.00419]

arXiv 2021

[51] [51]

Rahman, P

F. Rahman, P. Chingangbam and T. Ghosh,Statistical properties of galactic synchrotron temperature and polarization maps — a multi-frequency comparison,JCAP01(2024) 036 [2212.06076]

arXiv 2024

[52] [52]

Martire, A.J

F.A. Martire, A.J. Banday, E. Martínez-González and R.B. Barreiro,Morphological analysis of the polarized synchrotron emission with WMAP and Planck,JCAP04(2023) 049 [2301.08041]

arXiv 2023

[53] [53]

Kalberla and U

P.M.W. Kalberla and U. Haud,Aspect ratios of far-infrared and H I filaments in the diffuse interstellar medium at high Galactic latitudes,A&A673(2023) A101 [2303.16183]

arXiv 2023

[54] [54]

Ranucci, A

C. Ranucci, A. Carones, L. Vacher, N. Krachmalnicoff and C. Baccigalupi,B-sure I: Minkowski functionals as robustness test for tensor-to-scalar ratio detection from CMB observations,2510.18868

arXiv

[55] [55]

Puglisi, A

G. Puglisi, A. Anand and M. Migliaccio,Extending Galactic foreground emission with neural networks, 2604.16167

Pith/arXiv arXiv

[56] [57]

Adam, P.A.R

Planck Collaboration, R. Adam, P.A.R. Ade, N. Aghanim, M.I.R. Alves, M. Arnaud et al.,Planck 2015 results. X. Diffuse component separation: Foreground maps,A&A594(2016) A10 [1502.01588]. – 28 –

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

[57] [58]

Aghanim, Y

Planck Collaboration, N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi et al.,Planck 2018 results. III. High Frequency Instrument data processing and frequency maps,A&A641(2020) A3 [1807.06207]

arXiv 2018

[58] [59]

Matsubara,Analytic Minkowski functionals of the cosmic microwave background: Second-order non-Gaussianity with bispectrum and trispectrum,Phys

T. Matsubara,Analytic Minkowski functionals of the cosmic microwave background: Second-order non-Gaussianity with bispectrum and trispectrum,Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 083505 [1001.2321]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

[59] [60]

Pogosyan, C

D. Pogosyan, C. Gay and C. Pichon,Invariant joint distribution of a stationary random field and its derivatives: Euler characteristic and critical point counts in 2 and 3D,PRD80(2009) 081301 [0907.1437]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

[60] [61]

Matsubara and S

T. Matsubara and S. Kuriki,Weakly non-Gaussian formula for the Minkowski functionals in general dimensions,arXiv e-prints(2020) arXiv:2011.04954 [2011.04954]

arXiv 2020

[61] [62]

Miville-Deschênes and G

M.-A. Miville-Deschênes and G. Lagache,IRIS: A New Generation of IRAS Maps,ApJS157(2005) 302 [astro-ph/0412216]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[62] [63]

Meisner and D.P

A.M. Meisner and D.P. Finkbeiner,A Full-sky, High-resolution Atlas of Galactic 12µm Dust Emission with WISE,ApJ781(2014) 5 [1312.0947]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

[63] [64]

Ben Bekhti, L

HI4PI Collaboration, N. Ben Bekhti, L. Flöer, R. Keller, J. Kerp, D. Lenz et al.,HI4PI: A full-sky H I survey based on EBHIS and GASS,A&A594(2016) A116 [1610.06175]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

[64] [65]

Finkbeiner,A Full-Sky HαTemplate for Microwave Foreground Prediction,ApJS146(2003) 407 [astro-ph/0301558]

D.P. Finkbeiner,A Full-Sky HαTemplate for Microwave Foreground Prediction,ApJS146(2003) 407 [astro-ph/0301558]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

[65] [66]

A. Nath, T. Ghosh, P. Chingangbam, V. Pelgrims and F. Rahman.Unveiling the physical properties of galactic synchrotron emission using statistical tools, in prep

[66] [67]

Huffenberger and U

K.M. Huffenberger and U. Seljak,Prospects for ACT: Simulations, power spectrum, and non-Gaussian analysis,New Astron.10(2005) 491 [astro-ph/0408066]

Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

[67] [68]

Hervías-Caimapo, A.J

C. Hervías-Caimapo, A.J. Cukierman, P. Diego-Palazuelos, K.M. Huffenberger and S.E. Clark, Modeling parity-violating spectra in Galactic dust polarization with filaments and its applications to cosmic birefringence searches,Phys. Rev. D111(2025) 083532 [2408.06214]

arXiv 2025

[68] [69]

Y. Hu, K.H. Yuen and A. Lazarian,Predictions of Cosmic Microwave Background Foregrounds Dust Polarization Using Velocity Gradients,1910.05637

arXiv 1910

[69] [70]

Wang, J.-F

R.-Y. Wang, J.-F. Zhang, F. Lu and F.-Y. Xiang,Exploring the intermittency of magnetohydrodynamic turbulence by synchrotron polarization radiation,Astron. Astrophys.691(2024) A26 [2409.05739]

arXiv 2024

[70] [71]

Williamson, J

V. Williamson, J. Sunseri, Z. Slepian, J. Hou and A. Greco,First Measurements of the 4-Point Correlation Function of Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence as a Novel Probe of the Interstellar Medium, arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2412.03967 [2412.03967]

arXiv 2024

[71] [72]

Zonca, L

A. Zonca, L. Singer, D. Lenz, M. Reinecke, C. Rosset, E. Hivon et al.,healpy: equal area pixelization and spherical harmonics transforms for data on the sphere in Python,Journal of Open Source Software 4(2019) 1298

2019

[72] [73]

Alonso, J

D. Alonso, J. Sanchez, A. Slosar and L.D.E.S. Collaboration,A unified pseudo-Cℓ framework,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society484(2019) 4127 [https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article-pdf/484/3/4127/27747342/stz093.pdf]. – 29 –

2019