pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23863 · v1 · pith:KTK4AFCV · submitted 2026-06-22 · math.KT · math.AT· math.NT

The Goncharov Lie coalgebra of a field

pith:KTK4AFCVreviewed 2026-06-26 05:55 UTCmodel grok-4.3open to challenge →

classification math.KT math.ATmath.NT
keywords Goncharov Lie coalgebraalgebraic K-theorySteinberg modulespolylogarithmic complexRognes rank spectral sequencemotivic realizationHodge realization
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Goncharov Lie coalgebra, built from general linear group homology, expresses the rational algebraic K-theory of fields in weight 3 via polylogarithms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines the Goncharov Lie coalgebra using the E-infinity homology of general linear groups over a field. It derives a presentation from Steinberg modules, computes the Lie cobracket, and constructs motivic and Hodge realizations. These structures are then combined with the Rognes rank spectral sequence to produce explicit symbolic descriptions of the rationalized K-theory groups. The descriptions cover K four of weight three and the indecomposable part of K five of weight three, written in terms of Goncharov's polylogarithmic complex.

Core claim

We introduce the Goncharov Lie coalgebra defined in terms of the E∞-homology of general linear groups. Using Steinberg modules, we find a presentation, compute its Lie cobracket, and construct motivic and Hodge realisations. Combining these results with the Rognes rank spectral sequence, we give symbolic descriptions of the rationalisation of the algebraic K-theory of fields beyond the cases studied by Matsumoto-Milnor and Bloch-Suslin: we express K4(3)(F) and the indecomposable part of K5(3)(F) in terms of Goncharov's polylogarithmic complex of weight 3.

What carries the argument

The Goncharov Lie coalgebra, defined via the E∞-homology of general linear groups and presented using Steinberg modules, which supports the Lie cobracket computation and the motivic and Hodge realizations.

If this is right

  • The rational algebraic K-theory groups K4(3)(F) and the indecomposable summand of K5(3)(F) admit explicit descriptions in terms of the weight-3 polylogarithmic complex.
  • The method extends the earlier symbolic results known for weight 2 and weight 3 in lower degrees.
  • Motivic and Hodge realizations are available for the Goncharov Lie coalgebra itself.
  • The Rognes rank spectral sequence interacts with the new coalgebra structure to produce these identifications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If analogous presentations exist in higher weights, the same method could supply descriptions for additional K-theory groups.
  • The explicit link to the polylogarithmic complex may allow numerical checks for particular fields whose K-theory is already known by other means.
  • The coalgebra and its realizations could be compared with other spectral sequences that compute rational K-theory.

Load-bearing premise

The presentation of the Goncharov Lie coalgebra from Steinberg modules, together with its Lie cobracket and realizations, is compatible with the Rognes rank spectral sequence in the manner required to produce the claimed symbolic descriptions of the K-theory groups.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the group K4(3)(F) for a specific field F whose structure or dimension disagrees with the prediction coming from the weight-3 polylogarithmic complex.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23863 by Alexander Kupers, Daniil Rudenko, Ismael Sierra.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: in particular, they vanish for d ď 2n ´ 2 with the exception of pn, dq “ p1, 0q. The Goncharov Lie coalgebra is defined as those entries on the critical line above where this vanishing result applies: GpFq “ à ně1 H E8 n,2n´1 pBGLpFqQq. Its name is justified by Koszul duality between the nonunital commutative operad and the suspended Lie cooperad, which implies that E8-indecomposables admit the structure o… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A generator of St3pFq (on the left) and a generator of St2 3 pFq (on the right). To explain further structure, we organise all Steinberg modules into a single object. Let VectF denote the groupoid of finite-dimensional vector spaces over F and linear isomorphisms, then we can think of the Steinberg modules as a functor (with StpV q in degree dimpV q) St: VectF ÝÑ GrModQ V ÞÝÑ StpV q. The category VectF adm… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A generator of St8 3 pFq. We believe that the infinite Steinberg module is a remarkable object worth studying inde￾pendently. It can also be obtained from the common basis complex [Rog92] or the partial decomposition poset [HHS25, BPW24]. By Koszul duality, St 8 admits the structure of a Lie coalgebra with respect to ‘. Charlton, Radchenko, and Rudenko gave a presentation of the infinite Steinberg modules … view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A pictorial interpretation of duals to cyclic words, compatible with our discussion of infinite Steinberg modules, is as polygons. 3.2.6. Dual Lie coalgebras. Linearly dualising the discussions in Sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.3, degreewise by putting the generators in degree 1, we obtain from Section 3.2.4 a pair of surjective maps of Lie coalgebras as_ S ÝÑ lie_ S and sder_ S ÝÑ sder_ S which are compatible wit… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The E1-homology of BGLpFqQ is, up to a shift by ´1, the free graded-commutative algebra on the E8-homology, and thus vanishes for d ă 2n ´ 2 as indicated by the dashed line. We use the abbreviations Λ k :“ Λ kF ˆ Q and σ :“ Qtσu. 4.4. Recollections from proof of Theorem 4.3. We will need some ingredients of the proof of Theorem 4.3 from [GKRW25b]. We recall those here. 4.4.1. Steinberg modules and building… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The E1 -page E1 p,q of the Rognes rank spectral sequence, converging to KqpFq. The colours and dashed lines denote the `1-eigenspaces and -1-eigenspaces . The d 1 -differential has bidegree p´1, ´1q and necessarily sends ˘1-eigenspaces to ˘1-eigenspaces. 10.2. Computing the d 1 differentials in terms of the cobracket. We shall explain how to obtain most of the d 1 -differentials. Recall that the d 1 -diffe… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The E2 -page E2 p,q of the rank spectral sequence, converging to KqpFq. As before, the colours denote the `1-eigenspaces and ´1-eigenspaces . The d r -differential has bidegree p´r, ´1q and necessarily sends ˘1-eigenspaces to ˘1-eigenspaces, so there can be only a few nonzero differentials in this range. Proposition 10.5. There are isomorphisms (i) F ˆ –ÝÑ K1pFq. (ii) KM 2 pFq –ÝÑ K2pFq. (iii) K p2q 3 pFq … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper relates algebraic $K$-theory of fields to polylogarithms via general linear groups. We introduce the Goncharov Lie coalgebra, defined in terms of the $E_\infty$-homology of general linear groups. Using Steinberg modules, we find a presentation, compute its Lie cobracket, and construct motivic and Hodge realisations. Combining these results with the Rognes rank spectral sequence, we give symbolic descriptions of the rationalisation of the algebraic $K$-theory of fields beyond the cases studied by Matsumoto-Milnor and Bloch-Suslin: we express $K^{(3)}_4(F)$ and the indecomposable part of $K^{(3)}_5(F)$ in terms of Goncharov's polylogarithmic complex of weight 3.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper defines the Goncharov Lie coalgebra via E_∞-homology of general linear groups. Using Steinberg modules it obtains a presentation, computes the Lie cobracket, and constructs motivic and Hodge realizations. Combining these with the Rognes rank spectral sequence yields explicit rational descriptions of K_4^{(3)}(F) and the indecomposable summand of K_5^{(3)}(F) in terms of the weight-3 polylogarithmic complex, extending the Matsumoto–Milnor and Bloch–Suslin cases.

Significance. If the compatibility with the Rognes spectral sequence holds, the work supplies new symbolic expressions for rational algebraic K-theory of fields in weight 3. The Steinberg-module presentation, explicit cobracket computation, and realization maps are concrete strengths that could be reusable beyond this application.

major comments (1)
  1. [Combining these results with the Rognes rank spectral sequence] The central claim (abstract and the section combining results with the Rognes rank spectral sequence) rests on the Goncharov Lie coalgebra operations and realizations mapping onto the relevant pages and differentials of the Rognes spectral sequence without hidden extensions or missing filtration terms in weight 3. The manuscript provides no explicit verification or diagram chase confirming this compatibility for the stated K_4^{(3)} and K_5^{(3)} descriptions; this step is load-bearing and requires additional detail or a reference to a prior result establishing the necessary convergence and exactness.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise grading and filtration conventions used when passing from the E_∞-homology definition to the Steinberg presentation.
  2. Add a short table or diagram summarizing the motivic and Hodge realization maps on generators.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive report. The single major comment concerns the need for explicit verification of compatibility between our constructions and the Rognes rank spectral sequence. We address this point directly below and will revise the manuscript to strengthen this aspect of the argument.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Combining these results with the Rognes rank spectral sequence] The central claim (abstract and the section combining results with the Rognes rank spectral sequence) rests on the Goncharov Lie coalgebra operations and realizations mapping onto the relevant pages and differentials of the Rognes spectral sequence without hidden extensions or missing filtration terms in weight 3. The manuscript provides no explicit verification or diagram chase confirming this compatibility for the stated K_4^{(3)} and K_5^{(3)} descriptions; this step is load-bearing and requires additional detail or a reference to a prior result establishing the necessary convergence and exactness.

    Authors: We agree that the compatibility of the Goncharov Lie coalgebra operations, cobracket, and realization maps with the pages and differentials of the Rognes rank spectral sequence is central to the claimed descriptions of K_4^{(3)}(F) and the indecomposable summand of K_5^{(3)}(F), and that an explicit verification is required to rule out hidden extensions or missing filtration terms in weight 3. The constructions in the paper are intended to be compatible by design (via the E_∞-homology definition and the Steinberg-module presentation), but we acknowledge that the current text does not contain a dedicated diagram chase or convergence argument for this step. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (or appendix) providing the required diagram chase in weight 3, together with a precise statement of the induced maps on the E_2-page and the absence of obstructions in this range; if the compatibility follows from a prior reference on the Rognes spectral sequence we will cite it explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation chain is self-contained

full rationale

The paper defines the Goncharov Lie coalgebra from E_∞-homology of general linear groups, obtains a presentation via Steinberg modules, computes the Lie cobracket, and constructs motivic/Hodge realizations as independent steps. These are then combined with the external Rognes rank spectral sequence to produce new symbolic descriptions of K_4^{(3)}(F)_Q and the indecomposable part of K_5^{(3)}(F)_Q. No quoted step reduces a claimed result to a fitted input, self-definition, or self-citation chain by construction. The abstract and described claims treat the constructions as additive and independent, with the final combination presented as yielding results beyond prior cases (Matsumoto-Milnor, Bloch-Suslin). This is the normal non-circular case for a paper whose central output is a synthesis of separately derived objects.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; ledger left empty.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5665 in / 1187 out tokens · 29488 ms · 2026-06-26T05:55:58.229056+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · 3 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Aubry and D

    M. Aubry and D. Chataur, Cooperads and coalgebras as closed model categories, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 180 (2003), no. 1-2, 1--23. 1966520

  2. [2]

    Alekseev, N

    A. Alekseev, N. Kawazumi, Y. Kuno, and F. Naef, The G oldman- T uraev L ie bialgebra in genus zero and the K ashiwara- V ergne problem , Adv. Math. 326 (2018), 1--53. 3758425

  3. [3]

    Aguiar and S

    M. Aguiar and S. Mahajan, Monoidal functors, species and H opf algebras , CRM Monograph Series, vol. 29, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2010, With forewords by Kenneth Brown and Stephen Chase and Andr\' e Joyal. 2724388

  4. [4]

    A. Ash, J. Miller, and P. Patzt, Hopf algebras, S teinberg modules, and the unstable cohomology of SL _n( Z ) and GL _n( Z ) , 2024, arXiv:2404.13776

  5. [5]

    V. I. Arnold, The cohomology ring of the group of dyed braids, Mat. Zametki 5 (1969), 227--231. 242196

  6. [6]

    Alekseev and C

    A. Alekseev and C. Torossian, Flat connections and trivalent graphs, https://web.archive.org/web/20211028202354/https://webusers.imj-prg.fr/ charles.torossian/publication/trivalent.pdf, 2009

  7. [7]

    , The K ashiwara- V ergne conjecture and D rinfeld's associators , Ann. of Math. (2) 175 (2012), no. 2, 415--463. 2877064

  8. [8]

    Barr, Harrison homology, hochschild homology and triples, Journal of Algebra 8 (1968), 314--323

    M. Barr, Harrison homology, hochschild homology and triples, Journal of Algebra 8 (1968), 314--323

  9. [9]

    Blans and T

    M. Blans and T. Blom, On the chain rule in G oodwillie calculus , 2024, arXiv:2410.20504

  10. [10]

    Blans, T

    M. Blans, T. Blom, and A. Kupers, Naturality of -categorical bar-cobar duality, in preparation

  11. [11]

    Brown, M

    F. Brown, M. Chan, S. Galatius, and S. Payne, Hopf algebras in the cohomology of A _g , GL_n( Z ) , and SL_n( Z ) , 2024, arXiv:2405.11528

  12. [12]

    D. L. B. Brantner, R. Campos, and J. Nuiten, P D operads and explicit partition L ie algebras , Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 315 (2025), no. 1597, v+125. 5003477

  13. [13]

    Beilinson and P

    A. Beilinson and P. Deligne, Interpr\' e tation motivique de la conjecture de Z agier reliant polylogarithmes et r\' e gulateurs , Motives ( S eattle, WA , 1991), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 55, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994, pp. 97--121. 1265552

  14. [14]

    Berry, A

    N. Berry, A. Dubickas, N. D. Elkies, B. Poonen, and C. Smyth, The conjugate dimension of algebraic numbers, Q. J. Math. 55 (2004), no. 3, 237--252. 2082091

  15. [15]

    Berglund, Koszul spaces, Trans

    A. Berglund, Koszul spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no. 9, 4551--4569. 3217692

  16. [16]

    Bezrukavnikov, Koszul DG -algebras arising from configuration spaces , Geom

    R. Bezrukavnikov, Koszul DG -algebras arising from configuration spaces , Geom. Funct. Anal. 4 (1994), no. 2, 119--135. 1262702

  17. [17]

    Barwick, S

    C. Barwick, S. Glasman, and J. Shah, Spectral M ackey functors and equivariant algebraic K -theory, II , Tunis. J. Math. 2 (2020), no. 1, 97--146. 3933393

  18. [18]

    B\" o kstedt, W

    M. B\" o kstedt, W. C. Hsiang, and I. Madsen, The cyclotomic trace and algebraic K -theory of spaces , Invent. Math. 111 (1993), no. 3, 465--539. 1202133

  19. [19]

    Bloch and I

    S. Bloch and I. K r \' z , Mixed T ate motives , Ann. of Math. (2) 140 (1994), no. 3, 557--605. 1307897

  20. [20]

    S. J. Bloch, Higher regulators, algebraic K -theory, and zeta functions of elliptic curves , CRM Monograph Series, vol. 11, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2000. 1760901

  21. [21]

    Batanin and M

    M. Batanin and M. Markl, Centers and homotopy centers in enriched monoidal categories, Adv. Math. 230 (2012), no. 4-6, 1811--1858. 2927355

  22. [22]

    Ben-Moshe and T

    S. Ben-Moshe and T. M. Schlank, Higher semiadditive algebraic K -theory and redshift , Compos. Math. 160 (2024), no. 2, 237--287. 4679205

  23. [23]

    J. M. Boardman, Conditionally convergent spectral sequences, Homotopy invariant algebraic structures ( B altimore, MD , 1998), Contemp. Math., vol. 239, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1999, pp. 49--84. 1718076

  24. [24]

    Bolbachan, On the G oncharov's conjecture in degree m - 1 and weight m , 2024, arXiv:2404.06271

    V. Bolbachan, On the G oncharov's conjecture in degree m - 1 and weight m , 2024, arXiv:2404.06271

  25. [25]

    Borel, Stable real cohomology of arithmetic groups, Ann

    A. Borel, Stable real cohomology of arithmetic groups, Ann. Sci. \' E cole Norm. Sup. (4) 7 (1974), 235--272 (1975). 387496

  26. [26]

    Br\" u ck, K

    B. Br\" u ck, K. I. Piterman, and V. Welker, The common basis complex and the partial decomposition poset, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2024), no. 18, 12746--12760. 4798648

  27. [27]

    K. S. Brown, Cohomology of groups, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 87, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1994, Corrected reprint of the 1982 original. 1324339

  28. [28]

    Brown, Mixed T ate motives over Z , Ann

    F. Brown, Mixed T ate motives over Z , Ann. of Math. (2) 175 (2012), no. 2, 949--976. 2993755

  29. [29]

    Beilinson, A

    A. Beilinson, A. Varchenko, A. Goncharov, and V. Shekhtman, Projective geometry and K -theory , Algebra i Analiz 2 (1990), no. 3, 78--130. 1073210

  30. [30]

    Cartier, A primer of H opf algebras , Frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry

    P. Cartier, A primer of H opf algebras , Frontiers in number theory, physics, and geometry. II , Springer, Berlin, 2007, pp. 537--615. 2290769

  31. [31]

    Cathelineau, Homologie du groupe lin\' e aire et polylogarithmes (d'apr\`es A

    J.-L. Cathelineau, Homologie du groupe lin\' e aire et polylogarithmes (d'apr\`es A . B . G oncharov et d'autres) , Ast\' e risque (1993), no. 216, Exp. No. 772, 5, 311--341, S\' e minaire Bourbaki, Vol. 1992/93. 1246402

  32. [32]

    Charlton, A

    S. Charlton, A. Matveiakin, D. Radchenko, and D. Rudenko, The H opf algebra of formal multiple polylogarithms , 2024

  33. [33]

    , The H opf algebra of formal multiple polylogarithms , Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN (2026), no. 2, Paper No. rnaf361, 29. 5013247

  34. [34]

    F. R. Cohen, On configuration spaces, their homology, and L ie algebras , J. Pure Appl. Algebra 100 (1995), no. 1-3, 19--42. 1344842

  35. [35]

    Charlton, D

    S. Charlton, D. Radchenko, and D. Rudenko, Multiple polylogarithms and the S teinberg module , 2025

  36. [36]

    Ching and P

    M. Ching and P. Salvatore, Koszul duality for topological E_n -operads , Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 125 (2022), no. 1, 1--60. 4456966

  37. [37]

    Conant and K

    J. Conant and K. Vogtmann, On a theorem of K ontsevich , Algebr. Geom. Topol. 3 (2003), 1167--1224. 2026331

  38. [38]

    J. A. Campbell and I. Zakharevich, Hilbert's third problem and a conjecture of G oncharov , Adv. Math. 451 (2024), Paper No. 109757, 57. 4759410

  39. [39]

    Day, On closed categories of functors, Reports of the M idwest C ategory S eminar, IV , Lecture Notes in Math., Vol

    B. Day, On closed categories of functors, Reports of the M idwest C ategory S eminar, IV , Lecture Notes in Math., Vol. 137, Springer, Berlin-New York, 1970, pp. 1--38. 272852

  40. [40]

    Deligne, Th\' e orie de H odge

    P. Deligne, Th\' e orie de H odge. II , Inst. Hautes \' E tudes Sci. Publ. Math. (1971), no. 40, 5--57. 498551

  41. [41]

    Deligne and A

    P. Deligne and A. B. Goncharov, Groupes fondamentaux motiviques de T ate mixte , Ann. Sci. \' E cole Norm. Sup. (4) 38 (2005), no. 1, 1--56. 2136480

  42. [42]

    De Jeu, A remark on the rank conjecture, K -Theory 25 (2002), no

    R. De Jeu, A remark on the rank conjecture, K -Theory 25 (2002), no. 3, 215--231. 1909867

  43. [43]

    V. G. Drinfeld , On quasitriangular quasi- H opf algebras and on a group that is closely connected with Gal ( Q / Q ) , Algebra i Analiz 2 (1990), no. 4, 149--181, translated in Leningrad Math. J. 2 (1991), no. 4, 829--860. 1080203

  44. [44]

    C. Dupont, Progr \`e s rec \'e nts sur la conjecture de Z agier et le programme de G oncharov [d'apr \`e s G oncharov, R udenko, G angl, ...] , S \'e minaire Bourbaki 73 \`e me ann \'e e (2021), no. 1176

  45. [45]

    Felder, Internally connected graphs and the K ashiwara- V ergne L ie algebra , Lett

    M. Felder, Internally connected graphs and the K ashiwara- V ergne L ie algebra , Lett. Math. Phys. 108 (2018), no. 6, 1407--1441. 3797752

  46. [46]

    T. Feng, S. Galatius, and A. Venkatesh, The G alois action on symplectic K -theory , Invent. Math. 230 (2022), no. 1, 225--319. 4480148

  47. [47]

    Gepner, R

    D. Gepner, R. Haugseng, and T. Nikolaus, Lax colimits and free fibrations in -categories , Doc. Math. 22 (2017), 1225--1266. 3690268

  48. [48]

    Operads, homotopy algebra and iterated integrals for double loop spaces

    E. Getzler and J. D. S. Jones, Operads, homotopy algebra and iterated integrals for double loop spaces, 1994, arXiv:hep-th/9403055

  49. [49]

    Getzler and M

    E. Getzler and M. M. Kapranov, Cyclic operads and cyclic homology, Geometry, topology, & physics, Conf. Proc. Lecture Notes Geom. Topology, IV, Int. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995, pp. 167--201. 1358617

  50. [50]

    Galatius, A

    S. Galatius, A. Kupers, and O. Randal-Williams, E_ -cells and general linear groups of finite fields , Ann. Sci. \' E c. Norm. Sup\' e r. (4) 57 (2024), no. 6, 1845--1882. 4862505

  51. [51]

    460, x+299

    , Cellular E_k -algebras , Ast\' e risque (2025), no. 460, x+299. 4987221

  52. [52]

    , E_ -cells and general linear groups of infinite fields , Duke Math. J. 174 (2025), no. 14, 2927--3046. 4974473

  53. [53]

    Garner and I

    R. Garner and I. L\' o pez Franco, Commutativity, J. Pure Appl. Algebra 220 (2016), no. 5, 1707--1751. 3437265

  54. [54]

    Goncharov, Geometry of configurations, polylogarithms, and motivic cohomology, Adv

    A. Goncharov, Geometry of configurations, polylogarithms, and motivic cohomology, Adv. Math. 114 (1995), no. 2, 197--318. 1348706

  55. [55]

    u rich, 1994), Birkh\

    , Polylogarithms in arithmetic and geometry, Proceedings of the I nternational C ongress of M athematicians, V ol. 1, 2 ( Z \" u rich, 1994), Birkh\" a user, Basel, 1995, pp. 374--387. 1403938

  56. [56]

    Alexander Goncharov, Volumes of hyperbolic manifolds and mixed T ate motives , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 12 (1999), no. 2, 569--618. 1649192

  57. [57]

    Multiple polylogarithms and mixed Tate motives

    A. Goncharov, Multiple polylogarithms and mixed T ate motives , arXiv:math/0103059 [math.AG], 2001

  58. [58]

    A. B. Goncharov, The dihedral L ie algebras and G alois symmetries of _1^ (l) ( P^1-(\ 0, \ _N)) , Duke Math. J. 110 (2001), no. 3, 397--487. 1869113

  59. [59]

    , Euler complexes and geometry of modular varieties, Geom. Funct. Anal. 17 (2008), no. 6, 1872--1914. 2399086

  60. [60]

    Goncharov, Hodge correlators, J

    A. Goncharov, Hodge correlators, J. Reine Angew. Math. 748 (2019), 1--138. 3918430

  61. [61]

    Grinberg and V

    D. Grinberg and V. Reiner, Hopf algebras in combinatorics, 2014, arXiv:1409.8356

  62. [62]

    R. M. Hain, On the indecomposable elements of the bar construction, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 98 (1986), no. 2, 312--316. 854039

  63. [63]

    , Classical polylogarithms, Motives ( S eattle, WA , 1991), Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., vol. 55, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 1994, pp. 3--42. 1265550

  64. [64]

    u ber F unktionenk\

    G. Harder, Die K ohomologie S -arithmetischer G ruppen \" u ber F unktionenk\" o rpern , Invent. Math. 42 (1977), 135--175. 473102

  65. [65]

    Haugseng, On lax transformations, adjunctions, and monads in ( ,2) -categories , High

    R. Haugseng, On lax transformations, adjunctions, and monads in ( ,2) -categories , High. Struct. 5 (2021), no. 1, 244--281. 4367222

  66. [66]

    , -operads via symmetric sequences , Math. Z. 301 (2022), no. 1, 115--171. 4405646

  67. [67]

    Heine, A monadicity theorem for higher algebraic structures, 2017, arXiv:1712.00555

    H. Heine, A monadicity theorem for higher algebraic structures, 2017, arXiv:1712.00555

  68. [68]

    (N.S.) 32 (2026), no

    , A derived M ilnor- M oore theorem , Selecta Math. (N.S.) 32 (2026), no. 2, Paper No. 39. 5060174

  69. [69]

    Heuts, Koszul duality and a conjecture of F rancis-- G aitsgory , 2024, arXiv:2408.06173

    G. Heuts, Koszul duality and a conjecture of F rancis-- G aitsgory , 2024, arXiv:2408.06173

  70. [70]

    Haugseng, F

    R. Haugseng, F. Hebestreit, S. Linskens, and J. Nuiten, Lax monoidal adjunctions, two-variable fibrations and the calculus of mates, Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) 127 (2023), no. 4, 889--957. 4655344

  71. [71]

    Hanlon, P

    P. Hanlon, P. Hersh, and J. Shareshian, A G l_n(q) analogue of the partition lattice , arXiv:2505.02202, 2025

  72. [72]

    Hinich, Rectification of algebras and modules, Doc

    V. Hinich, Rectification of algebras and modules, Doc. Math. 20 (2015), 879--926. 3404213

  73. [73]

    , Yoneda lemma for enriched -categories , Adv. Math. 367 (2020), 107129, 119. 4080581

  74. [74]

    G. S. K. S. Heuts and M. Land, Koszul duality of E _n -algebras and E _n -operads , in preparation

  75. [75]

    , Formality of E _n -algebras and cochains on spheres , 2024, arXiv:2407.00790

  76. [76]

    Klang, J

    I. Klang, J. Kuijper, C. Malkiewich, D. Mehrle, and T. Wittich, Higher spherical scissors congruence I : H opf algebra , arxiv:2509.18009

  77. [77]

    Kontsevich, Formal (non)commutative symplectic geometry, The G elfand M athematical S eminars, 1990--1992, Birkh\" a user Boston, Boston, MA, 1993, pp

    M. Kontsevich, Formal (non)commutative symplectic geometry, The G elfand M athematical S eminars, 1990--1992, Birkh\" a user Boston, Boston, MA, 1993, pp. 173--187. 1247289

  78. [78]

    Kupers, D

    A. Kupers, D. Rudenko, and I. Sierra, Mixed tate motives over number fields, 2026, in preparation

  79. [79]

    Kahn and F

    B. Kahn and F. Sun, On universal modular symbols, 2014, arXiv:1407.0475

  80. [80]

    Levine, Tate motives and the vanishing conjectures for algebraic K -theory , Algebraic K -theory and algebraic topology ( L ake L ouise, AB , 1991), NATO Adv

    M. Levine, Tate motives and the vanishing conjectures for algebraic K -theory , Algebraic K -theory and algebraic topology ( L ake L ouise, AB , 1991), NATO Adv. Sci. Inst. Ser. C: Math. Phys. Sci., vol. 407, Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, 1993, pp. 167--188. 1367296

Showing first 80 references.