pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24288 · v1 · pith:AHL2UL7Pnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The large scale structure probes of dark energy

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:29 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords dark energylarge scale structurebaryon acoustic oscillationsweak lensingredshift space distortionsSunyaev-Zel'dovich effectphotometric redshift calibrationcluster number counts
0
0 comments X

The pith

Combining direct large-scale structure probes with auxiliary methods yields dark energy constraints of both high precision and high accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This review surveys large-scale structure probes that directly constrain dark energy, including baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift space distortions, weak lensing, and cluster number counts. It also covers auxiliary probes that control systematics, such as the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect for baryonic effects and broadband galaxy clustering for photometric redshift calibration. The central argument is that these direct and auxiliary probes work together to produce constraints that are simultaneously more precise through reduced statistical errors and more accurate through better systematics control. A sympathetic reader would care because dark energy remains poorly understood, and reliable measurements from upcoming surveys depend on managing the interplay of statistical and systematic uncertainties. The paper focuses on the practical benefit of joint analysis rather than any single probe in isolation.

Core claim

The paper demonstrates the synergy between direct LSS probes of dark energy such as baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift space distortions, weak lensing and cluster number counts, and auxiliary probes such as the SZ effect to constrain baryonic effects and broadband galaxy clustering to calibrate photometric redshifts, in delivering dark energy constraints of both high precision and high accuracy.

What carries the argument

Synergy between direct dark energy probes (BAO, RSD, weak lensing, cluster counts) and auxiliary systematics-mitigation probes (SZ effect, broadband galaxy clustering).

If this is right

  • Baryonic effects on cluster counts and weak lensing are reduced through SZ-based constraints.
  • Photometric redshift errors are calibrated using broadband galaxy clustering, lowering biases in distance and growth measurements.
  • Combined statistical power from multiple probes tightens limits on the dark energy equation of state.
  • Systematic biases are suppressed when auxiliary data validate the modeling assumptions of the direct probes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This multi-probe strategy could be extended to include cross-correlations with other observables such as the integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect to further test consistency.
  • Surveys that collect all these observables simultaneously may achieve tighter parameter bounds than the sum of separate analyses would suggest.
  • Failure to account for shared cosmic variance between probes could lead to over-optimistic error estimates in practice.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that systematics in each probe can be sufficiently mitigated by auxiliary methods without introducing new uncontrolled uncertainties that degrade the combined constraints.

What would settle it

If joint analyses after applying auxiliary methods produce dark energy constraints with larger discrepancies between probes or no improvement in overall precision compared to individual probes, the claimed synergy would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24288 by Pengjie Zhang, Shang Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sensitivity of different observables to dark energy parameters. Here the observables [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present a brief review on the large scale structure (LSS) probes of dark energy. We cover probes that directly constrain dark energy such as baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift space distortion, weak lensing and cluster number count. We also review auxiliary probes that mitigate systematics in dark energy constraints, such as the SZ effect to constrain baryonic effect and broadband galaxy clustering to calibrate photometric redshift. We demonstrate the synergy between these probes in delivering dark energy constraint of both high precision and high accuracy.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper presents a brief review of large-scale structure (LSS) probes of dark energy, covering direct constraints from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO), redshift-space distortions (RSD), weak lensing, and cluster number counts, along with auxiliary methods such as the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (SZ) effect for baryonic systematics and broadband galaxy clustering for photometric redshift calibration. The central claim is that these probes exhibit synergy, delivering dark energy constraints of both high precision and high accuracy, realized through synthesis of existing literature rather than new joint analyses or derivations.

Significance. As a review, the manuscript synthesizes standard LSS probes and their complementarity for dark energy studies. If the citations accurately reflect the literature, it could provide a concise overview useful for introducing the topic or highlighting established synergies. The paper does not advance new quantitative results, parameter constraints, or modeling innovations, limiting its significance to its role as a descriptive synthesis of current knowledge in the field.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states that the paper 'demonstrate[s] the synergy' but the content is a literature summary; consider adding a sentence in the introduction clarifying that the demonstration consists of citing existing joint analyses rather than performing new ones.
  2. Section headings and probe descriptions could benefit from explicit cross-references to key review papers or recent results for each method to improve traceability for readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript as a concise synthesis of LSS probes for dark energy and for recommending acceptance. No major comments were raised that require point-by-point response or manuscript changes.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified

full rationale

The paper is explicitly a brief review summarizing standard LSS probes (BAO, RSD, weak lensing, clusters) and auxiliary methods from external literature, with the synergy claim realized solely through citations rather than any new quantitative analysis, equations, or parameter fits performed within the manuscript. No derivation chain exists that could reduce to self-defined inputs, fitted predictions, or self-citation load-bearing steps, as confirmed by the absence of any original modeling or constraint calculations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper with no new derivations, so the ledger is empty of paper-specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. All content rests on prior literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5592 in / 1039 out tokens · 15924 ms · 2026-06-25T23:29:05.654083+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

126 extracted references · 123 canonical work pages · 10 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and 199 colleagues 2026.\ The Science of the Einstein Telescope.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2026

    Abac, A. and 199 colleagues 2026.\ The Science of the Einstein Telescope.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2026. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/03/081

  2. [2]

    Abbott, T. M. C. and 114 colleagues 2024.\ Dark Energy Survey: A 2.1\

  3. [3]

    Abbott, T. M. C. and 95 colleagues 2025.\ Dark energy survey year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from cluster abundances, weak lensing, and galaxy clustering.\ Physical Review D 112. doi:10.1103/3dzh-d8f5

  4. [4]

    DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints

    Abdul Karim, M. and 185 colleagues 2025.\ DESI DR2 results. II. Measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations and cosmological constraints.\ Physical Review D 112. doi:10.1103/tr6y-kpc6

  5. [5]

    and 199 colleagues 2019.\ The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019

    Ade, P. and 199 colleagues 2019.\ The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2019. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2019/02/056

  6. [6]

    Adame, A. G. and 199 colleagues 2025.\ DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/02/021

  7. [7]

    Adame, A. G. and 198 colleagues 2025.\ DESI 2024 V: Full-Shape galaxy clustering from galaxies and quasars.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/008

  8. [8]

    and 99 colleagues 2026.\ The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters Catalog.\ The Open Journal of Astrophysics 9, 55863

    Aguena, M. and 99 colleagues 2026.\ The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Selected Galaxy Clusters Catalog.\ The Open Journal of Astrophysics 9, 55863. doi:10.33232/001c.155863

  9. [9]

    Alam, S. and 98 colleagues 2021.\ Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological implications from two decades of spectroscopic surveys at the Apache Point Observatory.\ Physical Review D 103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.083533

  10. [10]

    and 31 colleagues 2025.\ The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Constraints on the structure growth from cluster number counts.\ Astronomy and Astrophysics 696

    Artis, E. and 31 colleagues 2025.\ The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey: Constraints on the structure growth from cluster number counts.\ Astronomy and Astrophysics 696. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452584

  11. [11]

    Aubert, M. and 21 colleagues 2022.\ The completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: growth rate of structure measurement from cosmic voids.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 513, 186--203. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac828

  12. [12]

    and 10 colleagues 2021.\ Novel Probes Project: Tests of gravity on astrophysical scales.\ Reviews of Modern Physics 93

    Baker, T. and 10 colleagues 2021.\ Novel Probes Project: Tests of gravity on astrophysical scales.\ Reviews of Modern Physics 93. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.93.015003

  13. [13]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/050

    Bellini, E., Sawicki, I.\ 2014.\ Maximal freedom at minimum cost: linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2014. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2014/07/050

  14. [14]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.07923, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.07923

    Besuner, R. and 109 colleagues 2025.\ The Spectroscopic Stage-5 Experiment.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2503.07923

  15. [15]

    E., et al

    Bocquet, S. and 197 colleagues 2024.\ SPT clusters with DES and HST weak lensing. II. Cosmological constraints from the abundance of massive halos.\ Physical Review D 110. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083510

  16. [16]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2567

    Bonvin, C., Lepori, F., Schulz, S., Tutusaus, I., Adamek, J., Fosalba, P.\ 2023.\ A case study for measuring the relativistic dipole of a galaxy cross-correlation with the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 525, 4611--4627. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2567

  17. [17]

    and 33 colleagues 2024.\ The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey

    Bulbul, E. and 33 colleagues 2024.\ The SRG/eROSITA All-Sky Survey. The first catalog of galaxy clusters and groups in the Western Galactic Hemisphere.\ Astronomy and Astrophysics 685. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348264

  18. [18]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3077

    Camarena, D., Marra, V., Sakr, Z., Clarkson, C.\ 2022.\ The Copernican principle in light of the latest cosmological data.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 509, 1291--1302. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3077

  19. [19]

    and Holder, G

    Carlstrom, J. E., Holder, G. P., Reese, E. D.\ 2002.\ Cosmology with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect.\ Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 40, 643--680. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.40.060401.093803

  20. [20]

    Physical Review Letters , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Chang, T.-C., Pen, U.-L., Peterson, J. B., McDonald, P.\ 2008.\ Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Intensity Mapping of Dark Energy.\ Physical Review Letters 100. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.091303

  21. [21]

    , year = 2010, month = jul, volume = 466, pages =

    Chang, T.-C., Pen, U.-L., Bandura, K., Peterson, J. B.\ 2010.\ An intensity map of hydrogen 21-cm emission at redshift z -0.5ex 0.8.\ Nature 466, 463--465. doi:10.1038/nature09187

  22. [22]

    Measurement of the galaxy-velocity power spectrum of DESI tracers with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect using DESI DR2 and ACT DR6

    Chaussidon, E. and 51 colleagues 2026.\ Measurement of the galaxy-velocity power spectrum of DESI tracers with the kinematic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect using DESI DR2 and ACT DR6.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.04867

  23. [23]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaca2f

    Chen, J., Zhang, P., Zheng, Y., Yu, Y., Jing, Y.\ 2018.\ Accurate Determination of Halo Velocity Bias in Simulations and Its Cosmological Implications.\ The Astrophysical Journal 861. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaca2f

  24. [24]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3604

    Chen, Z., Zhang, P., Yang, X., Zheng, Y.\ 2022.\ Detection of pairwise kSZ effect with DESI galaxy clusters and Planck.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 510, 5916--5928. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3604

  25. [25]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace1e2

    Chen, Z., Zhang, P., Yang, X.\ 2023.\ Thermal Energy Census with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect of DESI Galaxy Clusters/Groups and Its Implication on the Weak-lensing Power Spectrum.\ The Astrophysical Journal 953. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace1e2

  26. [26]

    doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2764-x

    Chen, Z., Yu, Y.\ 2025.\ CSST cosmological emulator II: Generalized accurate halo mass function emulation.\ Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy 68. doi:10.1007/s11433-025-2764-x

  27. [27]

    doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822

    Chevallier, M., Polarski, D.\ 2001.\ Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter.\ International Journal of Modern Physics D 10, 213?223. doi:10.1142/S0218271801000822

  28. [28]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    CHIME Collaboration and 38 colleagues 2025.\ Detection of the Cosmological 21 cm Signal in Auto-correlation at z -0.5ex 1 with the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2511.19620

  29. [29]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad957

    Chiu, I.-N., Klein, M., Mohr, J., Bocquet, S.\ 2023.\ Cosmological constraints from galaxy clusters and groups in the eROSITA final equatorial depth survey.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 522, 1601--1642. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad957

  30. [30]

    G., Padilla, A., Skordis, C.\ 2012.\ Modified gravity and cosmology.\ Physics Reports 513, 1--189

    Clifton, T., Ferreira, P. G., Padilla, A., Skordis, C.\ 2012.\ Modified gravity and cosmology.\ Physics Reports 513, 1--189. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2012.01.001

  31. [31]

    and 55 colleagues 2026.\ Full calibration of the tomographic redshift distribution from the HSC PDR3 Shape Catalog with DESI.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2026

    Choppin de Janvry, J. and 55 colleagues 2026.\ Full calibration of the tomographic redshift distribution from the HSC PDR3 Shape Catalog with DESI.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2026. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/05/073

  32. [32]

    Cole, S. and 30 colleagues 2005.\ The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: power-spectrum analysis of the final data set and cosmological implications.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 362, 505--534. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09318.x

  33. [33]

    and 153 colleagues 2024.\ Atacama Cosmology Telescope: High-resolution component-separated maps across one third of the sky.\ Physical Review D 109

    Coulton, W. and 153 colleagues 2024.\ Atacama Cosmology Telescope: High-resolution component-separated maps across one third of the sky.\ Physical Review D 109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.063530

  34. [34]

    and 40 colleagues 2011.\ Detection of the Power Spectrum of Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope.\ Physical Review Letters 107

    Das, S. and 40 colleagues 2011.\ Detection of the Power Spectrum of Cosmic Microwave Background Lensing by the Atacama Cosmology Telescope.\ Physical Review Letters 107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.021301

  35. [35]

    d'Assignies, W. and 94 colleagues 2025.\ Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Clustering-redshifts and importance sampling of Self-Organised-Maps n(z) realizations for 3 2 pt samples.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2510.23565

  36. [36]

    doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.10065

    DES Collaboration and 128 colleagues 2026.\ Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.10065

  37. [37]

    arXiv e-prints , keywords =

    DES Collaboration and 171 colleagues 2026.\ Dark Energy Survey Year 6 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2601.14559

  38. [38]

    The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics

    Di Valentino, E. and 199 colleagues 2025.\ The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics.\ Physics of the Dark Universe 49. doi:10.1016/j.dark.2025.101965

  39. [39]

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3379

    Ding, Z., Yu, Y., Zhang, P.\ 2024.\ Fisher forecast for the BAO measurements from the CSST spectroscopic and photometric galaxy clustering.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 527, 3728--3740. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3379

  40. [40]

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac905b

    Dong, F., Zhang, P., Sun, Z., Park, C.\ 2022.\ The First Direct Measurement of Gravitational Potential Decay Rate at Cosmological Scales and Improved Dark Energy Constraint.\ The Astrophysical Journal 938. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac905b

  41. [41]

    , keywords =

    Efstathiou, G., Sutherland, W. J., Maddox, S. J.\ 1990.\ The cosmological constant and cold dark matter.\ Nature 348, 705--707. doi:10.1038/348705a0

  42. [42]

    Eisenstein, D. J. and 47 colleagues 2005.\ Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies.\ The Astrophysical Journal 633, 560--574. doi:10.1086/466512

  43. [43]

    doi:10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1408

    Fan, Z., Shan, H., Liu, J.\ 2010.\ Noisy Weak-lensing Convergence Peak Statistics Near Clusters of Galaxies and Beyond.\ The Astrophysical Journal 719, 1408--1420. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/719/2/1408

  44. [44]

    doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071

    Feng, B., Wang, X., Zhang, X.\ 2005.\ Dark energy constraints from the cosmic age and supernova.\ Physics Letters B 607, 35--41. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2004.12.071

  45. [45]

    G.\ 2019.\ Cosmological Tests of Gravity.\ Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 57, 335--374

    Ferreira, P. G.\ 2019.\ Cosmological Tests of Gravity.\ Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 57, 335--374. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091918-104423

  46. [46]

    and 96 colleagues 2025.\ Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019--2020 SPT-3G polarization data.\ Physical Review D 111

    Ge, F. and 96 colleagues 2025.\ Cosmology from CMB lensing and delensed EE power spectra using 2019--2020 SPT-3G polarization data.\ Physical Review D 111. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.111.083534

  47. [47]

    and 48 colleagues 2024.\ The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: Cosmology constraints from cluster abundances in the western Galactic hemisphere.\ Astronomy and Astrophysics 689

    Ghirardini, V. and 48 colleagues 2024.\ The SRG/eROSITA all-sky survey: Cosmology constraints from cluster abundances in the western Galactic hemisphere.\ Astronomy and Astrophysics 689. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348852

  48. [48]

    Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements

    Gu, G. and 59 colleagues 2025.\ Dynamical dark energy in light of the DESI DR2 baryonic acoustic oscillations measurements.\ Nature Astronomy 9, 1879--1889. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02669-6

  49. [49]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032

    Gubitosi, G., Piazza, F., Vernizzi, F.\ 2013.\ The effective field theory of dark energy.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2013. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2013/02/032

  50. [50]

    Hadzhiyska, B. and 75 colleagues 2025.\ Evidence for large baryonic feedback at low and intermediate redshifts from kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich observations with ACT and DESI photometric galaxies.\ Physical Review D 112. doi:10.1103/kclp-x5j1

  51. [51]

    Precision Kinematic Sunyaev--Zel'dovich Measurements Across Halo Mass and Redshift with DESI DR2 and ACT DR6: Part II. Bright Galaxy Survey and Emission-Line Galaxies

    Hadzhiyska, B. and 52 colleagues 2026.\ Precision Kinematic Sunyaev--Zel'dovich Measurements Across Halo Mass and Redshift with DESI DR2 and ACT DR6: Part II. Bright Galaxy Survey and Emission-Line Galaxies.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2604.19745

  52. [52]

    and 57 colleagues 2012.\ Evidence of Galaxy Cluster Motions with the Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect.\ Physical Review Letters 109

    Hand, N. and 57 colleagues 2012.\ Evidence of Galaxy Cluster Motions with the Kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect.\ Physical Review Letters 109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.041101

  53. [53]

    Finding the Missing Baryons Using CMB as a Backlight

    Ho, S., Dedeo, S., Spergel, D.\ 2009.\ Finding the Missing Baryons Using CMB as a Backlight.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.0903.2845

  54. [54]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530

    Hu, B., Raveri, M., Frusciante, N., Silvestri, A.\ 2014.\ Effective field theory of cosmic acceleration: An implementation in CAMB.\ Physical Review D 89. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.89.103530

  55. [55]

    Testing General Relativity in Cosmology

    Ishak, M.\ 2019.\ Testing general relativity in cosmology.\ Living Reviews in Relativity 22. doi:10.1007/s41114-018-0017-4

  56. [56]

    and others

    Ishak, M. and 70 colleagues 2025.\ Modified gravity constraints from the full shape modeling of clustering measurements from DESI 2024.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/09/053

  57. [57]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.141302

    Jain, B., Taylor, A.\ 2003.\ Cross-Correlation Tomography: Measuring Dark Energy Evolution with Weak Lensing.\ Physical Review Letters 91. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.141302

  58. [58]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.063503

    Jain, B., Zhang, P.\ 2008.\ Observational tests of modified gravity.\ Physical Review D 78. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.063503

  59. [59]

    M.\ 2012.\ Large-scale clustering of galaxies in general relativity.\ Physical Review D 85

    Jeong, D., Schmidt, F., Hirata, C. M.\ 2012.\ Large-scale clustering of galaxies in general relativity.\ Physical Review D 85. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023504

  60. [60]

    doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002

    Joyce, A., Jain, B., Khoury, J., Trodden, M.\ 2015.\ Beyond the cosmological standard model.\ Physics Reports 568, 1--98. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2014.12.002

  61. [61]

    doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553

    Joyce, A., Lombriser, L., Schmidt, F.\ 2016.\ Dark Energy Versus Modified Gravity.\ Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66, 95--122. doi:10.1146/annurev-nucl-102115-044553

  62. [62]

    Klein, M. and 65 colleagues 2019.\ A new RASS galaxy cluster catalogue with low contamination extending to z 1 in the DES overlap region.\ Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 488, 739--769. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1463

  63. [63]

    M., Turner, M

    Krauss, L. M., Turner, M. S.\ 1995.\ The cosmological constant is back.\ General Relativity and Gravitation 27, 1137--1144. doi:10.1007/BF02108229

  64. [64]

    C., Johnson, M

    Krywonos, J., Hotinli, S. C., Johnson, M. C.\ 2024.\ Constraints on cosmology beyond CDM with kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich velocity reconstruction.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2408.05264

  65. [65]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.121301

    Kunz, M., Sapone, D.\ 2007.\ Dark Energy versus Modified Gravity.\ Physical Review Letters 98. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.121301

  66. [66]

    La Posta, A., Alonso, D., Chisari, N. E., Ferreira, T., Garc \' a-Garc \' a, C.\ 2025.\ Insights on gas thermodynamics from the combination of x-ray and thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich data cross correlated with cosmic shear.\ Physical Review D 112. doi:10.1103/m77z-w7pl

  67. [67]

    doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/065

    Li, J., Zheng, Y., Zhu, W.\ 2026.\ Tracing missing baryons in the cosmic filaments with tSZ and CMB-lensing stacking.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2026. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2026/02/065

  68. [68]

    and 34 colleagues 2023.\ Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions.\ Physical Review D 108

    Li, X. and 34 colleagues 2023.\ Hyper Suprime-Cam Year 3 results: Cosmology from cosmic shear two-point correlation functions.\ Physical Review D 108. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.108.123518

  69. [69]

    Libanore, S. and 7 colleagues 2022.\ Clustering of Gravitational Wave and Supernovae events: a multitracer analysis in Luminosity Distance Space.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2022. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/02/003

  70. [70]

    V.\ 2003.\ Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe.\ Physical Review Letters 90

    Linder, E. V.\ 2003.\ Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe.\ Physical Review Letters 90. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.091301

  71. [71]

    V.\ 2005.\ Cosmic growth history and expansion history.\ Physical Review D 72

    Linder, E. V.\ 2005.\ Cosmic growth history and expansion history.\ Physical Review D 72. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.72.043529

  72. [72]

    Liu, R. H. and 56 colleagues 2025.\ Measurements of the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect with ACT and DESI luminous red galaxies.\ Physical Review D 112. doi:10.1103/jqn8-19gx

  73. [73]

    and 126 colleagues 2025.\ Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements.\ Physical Review D 112

    Lodha, K. and 126 colleagues 2025.\ Extended dark energy analysis using DESI DR2 BAO measurements.\ Physical Review D 112. doi:10.1103/w4c6-1r5j

  74. [74]

    The Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST) Science White Paper

    Mainieri, V. and 199 colleagues 2024.\ The Wide-field Spectroscopic Telescope (WST) Science White Paper.\ arXiv e-prints. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2403.05398

  75. [75]

    and 60 colleagues 2025.\ A joint analysis of 3D clustering and galaxy CMB-lensing cross-correlations with DESI DR1 galaxies.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025

    Maus, M. and 60 colleagues 2025.\ A joint analysis of 3D clustering and galaxy CMB-lensing cross-correlations with DESI DR1 galaxies.\ Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 2025. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/077

  76. [76]

    2014, ApJL, 780, L33, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/L33

    McQuinn, M.\ 2014.\ Locating the ``Missing'' Baryons with Extragalactic Dispersion Measure Estimates.\ The Astrophysical Journal 780. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/780/2/L33

  77. [77]

    A.\ 2008.\ Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations.\ The Astrophysical Journal 684, 88--101

    Newman, J. A.\ 2008.\ Calibrating Redshift Distributions beyond Spectroscopic Limits with Cross-Correlations.\ The Astrophysical Journal 684, 88--101. doi:10.1086/589982

  78. [78]

    doi:10.2183/pjab.101.010

    Oguri, M., Miyazaki, S.\ 2025.\ Peaks in weak lensing mass maps for cluster astrophysics and cosmology.\ Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B 101, 129--142. doi:10.2183/pjab.101.010

  79. [79]

    Peebles, P. J. E.\ 1980.\ The large-scale structure of the universe.\ Large-Scale Structure of the Universe by Phillip James Edwin Peebles. Princeton University Press, 1980. ISBN: 978-0-691-08240-0

  80. [80]

    Peebles, P. J. E.\ 1984.\ Tests of cosmological models constrained by inflation.\ The Astrophysical Journal 284, 439--444. doi:10.1086/162425

Showing first 80 references.