pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25689 · v1 · pith:VPKWABMBnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Tracing the Star Formation History of the Universe through Thermal Free-Free Emission with the SKA

Hiddo S. B. Algera , Mark Sargent , Eric J. Murphy , Fangxia An This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:26 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords star formation rate densityfree-free emissionSKAradio continuumgalaxy surveyscosmic star formation historyhigh redshift galaxies
0
0 comments X

The pith

SKA multi-band surveys can recover thermal star formation rates in 15000 galaxies out to redshift 7 with 0.1 dex precision.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper forecasts the performance of a proposed matched-depth multi-band SKA-Mid survey covering 0.25 square degrees across frequencies from 0.35 to 15.4 GHz. Simulations show that this setup detects about 15000 star-forming galaxies in all bands out to redshift 7. Fitting the radio spectra allows recovery of the thermal free-free emission fraction without bias, producing small uncertainties on the derived star formation rates that support constraints on the cosmic star formation rate density when combined with other measurements.

Core claim

Using simulations of the faint radio sky, an ambitious matched-depth multi-band SKA-Mid survey covering 0.25 square degrees from 0.35 to 15.4 GHz is predicted to detect about 15000 star-forming galaxies in all bands out to redshift 7. Established fitting techniques applied to the data show that thermal fractions and synchrotron spectral indices can be constrained without bias, with uncertainties on the thermal star formation rates of 0.1 dex or less for galaxies at the knee of the radio luminosity function. This allows the inferred distribution of thermal fractions to be combined with wider low-frequency luminosity function measurements to obtain robust constraints on the cosmic star formati

What carries the argument

Multi-frequency fitting of the radio spectrum to isolate the thermal free-free emission component from the synchrotron emission.

If this is right

  • Uncertainties on thermal star formation rates remain below 0.1 dex for galaxies at the knee of the luminosity function at all redshifts.
  • The thermal fraction distribution from the survey enables robust cosmic star formation rate density constraints when combined with low-frequency luminosity functions.
  • Approximately 15000 star-forming galaxies are detectable across all bands out to redshift 7.
  • Thermal fractions and synchrotron spectral indices can be recovered in an unbiased manner from the multi-band data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method supplies a dust-unbiased measure of star formation that can test results from other wavelengths.
  • The precision achieved may help clarify the evolution of star formation activity in the early universe.
  • Applying similar fitting to future deeper surveys could extend the constraints beyond redshift 7.

Load-bearing premise

Simulations of the radio properties of star-forming galaxies at redshifts up to 7 accurately capture the real thermal free-free emission and synchrotron characteristics.

What would settle it

Actual observations from the SKA survey revealing a significantly different number of detected galaxies or larger uncertainties in the recovered thermal star formation rates than predicted.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25689 by Eric J. Murphy, FangXia An, Hiddo S. B. Algera, Mark Sargent.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The typical long-wavelength spectrum of a star-forming galaxy with SFR = 100 𝑀⊙ yr−1 , plotted for a range of redshifts between 𝑧 = 2−9. The radio component assumes a thermal fraction of 𝑓th (1.4 GHz) = 0.1 and a synchrotron slope of 𝛼NT = −0.85, while dust emission is modeled as a modified blackbody with temperature 𝑇dust = 35 K and emissivity index 𝛽IR = 2.0. The individual free-free, synchrotron and dus… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Radio luminosity at the rest-frame frequency probed by SKA-Mid Band 2 (𝜈obs = 1.355 GHz) against redshift for galaxies sampled in the central 0.25 deg2 of an SKA-Mid Band 2 pointing with a 5𝜎 = 2.0 𝜇Jy/beam depth. The luminosity limit of the survey is indicated through the dashed black line. Approximately 1.5 × 104 radio sources – the vast majority (≳ 95%) of which are star-forming galaxies – are expected … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The radio spectrum of an example mock 𝑧 ≈ 2.5 galaxy, as will be identified in large numbers in upcoming deep SKA-Mid surveys. The radio spectrum is sampled in Bands 1, 2, 5a and 5b (red datapoints; central observed-frame frequencies are annotated on the top 𝑥-axis) and decomposed into its synchrotron (red) and free-free (blue) components. The black line and grey shading represent the total spectrum and it… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fitted thermal fractions (left) and synchrotron spectral indices (right) of our mock radio sources as a function of their input values. Contours are drawn at the 0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2𝜎 levels, and individual datapoints are color-coded by 𝛼NT (left) or 𝑓th (1.4 GHz) (right). Three representative errorbars are shown in the bottom right corner of each panel, and correspond to different bins in Band 2 S/N (5 −… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Offset between fitted and input thermal fractions (at 1.4 GHz; Δ 𝑓th = 𝑓th,fit − 𝑓th,input) versus that for the synchrotron slope (Δ𝛼NT, defined analogously) across the full population of mock sources. There are no systematic biases in the recovery of either parameter, although a mild anti-correlation is visible. in this Chapter, the errors represent the 16 − 84th percentile spread of the distribution). Wh… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The accuracy with which the thermal fractions (left) and synchrotron spectral indices (right) can be recovered, as a function of the Band 2 signal-to-noise ratio. Contours and points are as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The typical 1𝜎 uncertainty on the thermal fraction (left) and synchrotron spectral index (right) as a function of redshift. Three bins of SKA-Mid Band 2 S/N are considered, and only those with ≥ 5 sources are plotted. The solid lines represent the median uncertainty on 𝑓th (1.4 GHz) and 𝛼NT in a given bin, while the shaded regions represent the 16−84th percentile scatter. At a fixed signal-to-noise ratio, … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Binned rest-frame 1.4 GHz radio luminosity versus redshift for our mock SKA-Mid survey. The bins are color-coded by their mean free-free S/N. The thick dashed line corresponds to the approximate sensitivity limit, based on the 5𝜎 SKA-Mid Band 2 detection threshold of 2 𝜇Jy/beam and a fixed 𝛼 = −0.70. The thin line represents sources that are 4× brighter than this limit (i.e., detected at the ∼ 20𝜎 level). … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

One of the major scientific aims of the SKA is to trace the history of star formation across cosmic time. High-frequency radio surveys are indispensable in this regard, as these are capable of probing thermal free-free emission (FFE) -- the dominant component of the radio continuum of star-forming galaxies above rest-frame frequencies of $\gtrsim25\,$GHz. FFE is a powerful, direct star-formation rate (SFR) indicator, which robustly traces the number of ionizing photons produced by recently formed massive stars in a nearly dust-unbiased manner. In this chapter, we forecast the ability of the SKA to detect FFE in typical star-forming galaxies in the early Universe. Our starting point is the state-of-the-art T-RECS simulation suite of the faint radio sky, to which we apply an ambitious, matched-depth, multi-band AA4 SKA-Mid survey in Bands 1 through 5b, covering an area of $0.25\,\mathrm{deg}^2$ across $0.35 - 15.4\,\mathrm{GHz}$. We predict that such a survey will detect $\sim1.5\times10^4$ star-forming galaxies in all bands out to $z\approx7$, and perform simulations using established fitting techniques to investigate the accuracy with which their thermal FFE can be recovered. We find that thermal fractions ($f_\mathrm{th}$) and synchrotron spectral indices can be constrained in an unbiased manner, and predict uncertainties on the thermal SFRs of $\lesssim 0.1\,\mathrm{dex}$ for galaxies at the knee of the radio luminosity function across redshift. Convolving the distribution of $f_\mathrm{th}$ inferred from the multi-band SKA-Mid survey with wider luminosity function determinations at low radio frequencies will yield robust constraints on the total cosmic star formation rate density out to $z\sim7$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper forecasts the performance of a matched-depth multi-band AA4 SKA-Mid survey (Bands 1–5b over 0.25 deg², 0.35–15.4 GHz) using the T-RECS simulation suite. It predicts detection of ∼1.5×10^4 star-forming galaxies out to z≈7, unbiased recovery of thermal fractions f_th and synchrotron indices via established fitting, thermal SFR uncertainties ≲0.1 dex at the knee of the radio luminosity function, and, after convolution with low-frequency luminosity functions, robust constraints on the cosmic SFR density to z∼7.

Significance. If the underlying simulation inputs are reliable, the work supplies a concrete, quantitative forecast for how SKA-Mid multi-band data can separate thermal free-free emission and thereby improve measurements of the high-redshift star-formation history; the statistical sample size and quoted precision would be a useful planning benchmark for SKA early science.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (T-RECS and mock survey)] Methods section on T-RECS application and mock survey construction: the central predictions (detection numbers, ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR uncertainties, and subsequent SFRD constraints) are obtained by injecting T-RECS galaxies as both mock data and ground truth. No external high-z observational anchor (ALMA 100 GHz stacks, JVLA 30 GHz data, or similar) is cited to validate the joint distribution of thermal free-free luminosity, synchrotron spectral index, or any curvature/free-free absorption at rest-frame frequencies ≳25 GHz for z up to 7. This assumption is load-bearing for translating the simulated fitting results to real observations.
  2. [Results (uncertainty recovery)] Results section on recovered uncertainties: the quoted ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR precision at the knee is reported for galaxies across redshift, yet the text provides no explicit sensitivity test showing how these uncertainties degrade if the input synchrotron indices or thermal fractions in T-RECS are varied within plausible observational ranges at z>4.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The abstract and main text refer to “established fitting techniques” without naming the specific method (e.g., MCMC, least-squares with fixed priors) or providing the functional form used for the multi-band spectral decomposition; this should be stated explicitly for reproducibility.
  2. [Results] Figure captions and text should clarify whether the reported 1.5×10^4 detections refer to sources detected in all bands simultaneously or to the union across bands; the distinction affects the interpretation of the f_th recovery statistics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive report and positive assessment of the work's significance for SKA planning. We address each major comment below. We agree that the simulation-based nature of the forecasts requires additional discussion of assumptions and robustness tests, which we will incorporate via partial revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Methods section on T-RECS application and mock survey construction: the central predictions (detection numbers, ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR uncertainties, and subsequent SFRD constraints) are obtained by injecting T-RECS galaxies as both mock data and ground truth. No external high-z observational anchor (ALMA 100 GHz stacks, JVLA 30 GHz data, or similar) is cited to validate the joint distribution of thermal free-free luminosity, synchrotron spectral index, or any curvature/free-free absorption at rest-frame frequencies ≳25 GHz for z up to 7. This assumption is load-bearing for translating the simulated fitting results to real observations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that T-RECS provides the joint distributions used for both mock observations and truth, and that direct high-z anchors at rest-frame ≳25 GHz remain limited. T-RECS is calibrated on existing lower-z radio data with extrapolations for high-z evolution; we will add a new subsection in Methods explicitly discussing these assumptions, citing relevant high-z continuum constraints (e.g., JVLA 3 GHz and ALMA 100 GHz stacks where they overlap in frequency), and noting the extrapolation as a limitation of current knowledge rather than a validated input. The multi-band fitting methodology itself is drawn from established lower-z techniques. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Results section on recovered uncertainties: the quoted ≲0.1 dex thermal SFR precision at the knee is reported for galaxies across redshift, yet the text provides no explicit sensitivity test showing how these uncertainties degrade if the input synchrotron indices or thermal fractions in T-RECS are varied within plausible observational ranges at z>4.

    Authors: We agree an explicit sensitivity test is warranted. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (and associated figure) that perturbs the input synchrotron index and thermal fraction distributions in T-RECS within ranges consistent with existing z>4 radio observations, then re-runs the fitting pipeline to quantify degradation in the recovered thermal SFR uncertainties. This will directly address robustness at z>4. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct external observational validation of the T-RECS joint distributions for thermal free-free luminosity and synchrotron properties at z≈7 and rest-frame frequencies ≳25 GHz, as suitable high-frequency, high-redshift data do not yet exist.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forecasts from external T-RECS mocks

full rationale

The paper's derivation begins with the external T-RECS simulation suite as input, applies standard multi-band fitting techniques to mock SKA-Mid observations, and reports resulting detection counts and uncertainty estimates as forecasts. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rely on a self-citation chain whose authors overlap with the present work. The central results remain independent of quantities defined or tuned inside the paper itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The forecast rests on the domain assumption that the T-RECS simulation suite correctly captures the radio properties of high-redshift galaxies; no new free parameters are introduced in the abstract, and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The T-RECS simulation suite accurately models the faint radio sky including thermal free-free emission components of star-forming galaxies at z up to 7.
    The entire forecast begins from this simulation as the starting point for applying the SKA survey strategy.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5889 in / 1371 out tokens · 27770 ms · 2026-06-25T20:26:25.399017+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 903(2):138, Nov. 2020a. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb77b. H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 903(2):139, Nov. 2020b. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb77a. H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 912(1):73, May

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abb77b

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe6a5. H. S. B. Algera et al.ApJ, 924(2):76, Jan

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abe6a5

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac34f5. H. S. B. Algera et al.MNRAS, 518(4):6142–6157, Feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac34f5

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3195. F. An et al.MNRAS, 507(2):2643–2658, Oct

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac3195

  5. [5]

    F.X.Anetal

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2290. F.X.Anetal. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII).2026. arXivsearch: Report number AASKAII/FangxiaAn01. E. F. Bell.ApJ, 586(2):794–813, Apr

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2290 2026

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.1086/367829. A. Bonaldi et al.MNRAS, 482(1):2–19, Jan

    work page doi:10.1086/367829

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2603. M. Bonzini et al.MNRAS, 436(4):3759–3771, Dec

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty2603

  8. [8]

    15 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt1879. 15 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B. Algera et al. R. J. Bouwens et al.ApJ, 803(1):34, Apr

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt1879

  9. [9]

    A.Bressan,L.Silva,andG.L.Granato.A&A,392:377–391,Sept.2002

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/803/1/34. A.Bressan,L.Silva,andG.L.Granato.A&A,392:377–391,Sept.2002. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20020960. G. Calistro Rivera et al.MNRAS, 469(3):3468–3488, Aug

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/803/1/34 2002

  10. [10]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1040. C. M. Casey et al.ApJ, 862(1):77, July

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1040

  11. [11]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac82d. C. M. Casey et al.ApJ, 954(1):31, Sept

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac82d

  12. [12]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc. Q. Chen et al.ApJ, 972(2):147, Sept

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acc2bc

  13. [13]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ceb. M. Cirasuolo et al. In S. K. Ramsay, I. S. McLean, and H. Takami, editors,Ground-based and AirborneInstrumentationforAstronomyV,volume9147ofSocietyofPhoto-OpticalInstrumen- tation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, page 91470N, July

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5ceb

  14. [14]

    doi: 10.1117/12.2056012. R. K. Cochrane et al.MNRAS, 523(4):6082–6102, Aug

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2056012

  15. [15]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1602. J. J. Condon.ARA&A, 30:575–611, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1602

  16. [16]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043. J. J. Condon.PASP, 109:166–172, Feb

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.30.090192.003043

  17. [17]

    doi: 10.1086/133871. J. Conway et al.SKA Memos, SKA Memos:1, Feb

    work page doi:10.1086/133871

  18. [18]

    doi: 10.18727/0722-6691/5117. G. De Zotti et al.A&A, 689:A272, Sept

    work page doi:10.18727/0722-6691/5117

  19. [19]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449313. A. Del Moro et al.A&A, 549:A59, Jan

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449313

  20. [20]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219880. J. Delhaize et al.A&A, 602:A4, June

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219880

  21. [21]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629430. I. Delvecchio et al.A&A, 602:A3, June

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629430

  22. [22]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629367. I. Delvecchio et al.A&A, 647:A123, Mar

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629367

  23. [23]

    DESI Collaboration et al.AJ, 171(5):285, May

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039647. Euclid Collaboration et al.A&A, 662:A112, June

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039647

  24. [24]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141938. S. L. Finkelstein et al.ApJL, 946(1):L13, Mar

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202141938

  25. [25]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acade4. D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman.PASP, 125(925):306, Mar

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acade4 2041

  26. [26]

    doi: 10.1086/670067. Y. Fudamoto et al.Nature, 597(7877):489–492, Sept

    work page doi:10.1086/670067

  27. [27]

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03846-z. T. J. Galvin et al.MNRAS, 474(1):779–799, Feb

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03846-z

  28. [28]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2613. M. Giavalisco et al.ApJL, 600(2):L93–L98, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2613

  29. [29]

    doi: 10.1086/379232. J. Glenn et al.Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11:031628, July

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/379232

  30. [30]

    doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.11.3.031628. C. Gruppioni et al.A&A, 643:A8, Nov

    work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.3.031628

  31. [31]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038487. T. Hashimoto et al.PASJ, 71(4):71, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038487

  32. [32]

    doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz049. N. Herrera Ruiz et al.A&A, 607:A132, Nov

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psz049

  33. [33]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731163. M. T. Huynh et al.MNRAS, 467(1):1222–1230, May

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731163

  34. [34]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx156. H. Inami et al.MNRAS, 515(3):3126–3143, Sept

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx156

  35. [35]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1779. Y. Isobe et al.ApJ, 956(2):139, Oct

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1779

  36. [36]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376. E. F. Jiménez-Andrade et al.A&A, 625:A114, May

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

  37. [37]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935178. E. F. Jiménez-Andrade et al.ApJ, 972(1):89, Sept

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935178

  38. [38]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b5c. A. A. Khostovan et al.ApJSS, 282(1):6, Jan

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5b5c

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae1cb9. U. Klein, U. Lisenfeld, and S. Verley.A&A, 611:A55, Mar

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae1cb9

  40. [40]

    Planck 2018 results

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201731673. A.Lawrenceetal.MNRAS,379(4):1599–1617,Aug.2007. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12040. x. S. K. Leslie et al.ApJ, 899(1):58, Aug

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2007

  41. [41]

    K., Schinnerer, E., Liu, D., et al

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aba044. 16 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B. Algera et al. S. T. Linden et al.ApJSS, 248(2):25, June

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aba044

  42. [42]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab8a4d. J. Lyu, S. Alberts, G. H. Rieke, and W. Rujopakarn.ApJ, 941(2):191, Dec

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab8a4d

  43. [43]

    doi: 10.1146/ annurev-astro-081811-125615. V. Mainieri et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2403.05398, Mar

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403. 05398. R. J. McLure et al.MNRAS, 432(4):2696–2716, July

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403

  45. [45]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt627. O. Miettinen et al.A&A, 602:A54, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt627

  46. [46]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730443. J. Moldon et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201730443

  47. [47]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab746. L. K. Morabito et al.MNRAS, 536(1):L32–L37, Jan

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab746

  48. [48]

    doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae104. E. J. Murphy.ApJ, 706(1):482–496, Nov

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slae104

  49. [49]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/1/482. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJL, 709(2):L108–L113, Feb

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/1/482

  50. [50]

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/L108. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 737(2):67, Aug

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/709/2/l108 2041

  51. [51]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/67. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 839(1):35, Apr

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/2/67

  52. [52]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa62fd. E. J. Murphy et al.ApJ, 862(1):20, July

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa62fd

  53. [53]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f5. S. Niklas, U. Klein, and R. Wielebinski.A&A, 322:19–28, June

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac5f5

  54. [54]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629436. P. A. Oesch et al.ApJ, 855(2):105, Mar

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629436

  55. [55]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f. P. Padovani et al.ApJ, 740(1):20, Oct

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aab03f

  56. [56]

    G.Pelusoetal.arXive-prints,art.arXiv:2509.17536,Sept.2025.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.17536

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/1/20. G.Pelusoetal.arXive-prints,art.arXiv:2509.17536,Sept.2025.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.17536. I. Prandoni and N. Seymour. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), page 67, Apr

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/1/20 2025

  57. [57]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0067. I. Prandoni et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.22323/1.215.0067

  58. [58]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833399. J. F. Radcliffe et al.A&A, 649:L9, May

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833399

  59. [59]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140791. M. T. Sargent et al.ApJSS, 186(2):341–377, Feb. 2010a. doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/341. M. T. Sargent et al.ApJL, 714(2):L190–L195, May 2010b. doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/714/2/L190. D.R.G.SchleicherandR.Beck.A&A,556:A142,Aug.2013.doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321707. V. Smolčić et al.A&A, 602:A2, June 2017a. doi: 10.1051/0004-63...

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140791 2041

  60. [60]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d0e. F. Tabatabaei et al.ApJ, 989(1):44, Aug

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad9d0e

  61. [61]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ade233. F. S. Tabatabaei et al.ApJ, 836(2):185, Feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ade233

  62. [62]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/185. N. Tamura et al. In C. J. Evans, L. Simard, and H. Takami, editors,Ground-based and Airborne Instrumentation for Astronomy VI, volume 9908 ofSociety of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, page 99081M, Aug

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/185

  63. [63]

    doi: 10.1117/12.2232103. A. P. Thomson et al.MNRAS, 425(3):2203–2211, Sept

    work page doi:10.1117/12.2232103

  64. [64]

    Long orbital period systems and the energy budget of common envelope evolution

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012. 17 Free-free emission with the SKA H.S.B. Algera et al. 21584.x. A. P. Thomson et al.ApJ, 883(2):204, Oct

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012 2012

  65. [65]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab32e7. K. Tisanić et al.A&A, 621:A139, Jan

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab32e7

  66. [66]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834002. D. van der Vlugt et al.ApJ, 941(1):10, Dec

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834002

  67. [67]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac99db. A. van der Wel et al.ApJ, 788(1):28, June

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac99db

  68. [68]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/788/1/28. I. H. Whittam et al.MNRAS, 543(1):507–517, Oct

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/788/1/28

  69. [69]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1505. I. Yoon.ApJ, 975(1):15, Nov

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf1505

  70. [70]

    M.S.Yun,N.A.Reddy,andJ.J.Condon.ApJ,554(2):803–822,June2001

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7385. M.S.Yun,N.A.Reddy,andJ.J.Condon.ApJ,554(2):803–822,June2001. doi: 10.1086/323145. J. A. Zavala et al.ApJ, 909(2):165, Mar

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad7385

  71. [71]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abdb27. J. A. Zavala et al.ApJL, 998(2):L36, Feb

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abdb27

  72. [72]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae382a. 18

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae382a 2041