Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 1 minor 55 references

Study for curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation process on polar-cap region of magnetic white dwarf

T0 review · 3 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Pair creation in magnetic white dwarfs occurs only for spin periods shorter than about 100 seconds when dipole fields are below 10^10 gauss.

desk verdict The paper's key output is a death line for pair creation in white dwarfs at P ≲ 100 s and B_d ≲ 10^10 G using an SCLF model with quadrupole fields, but the framework is not validated on neutron-star parameters. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.25806 v1 pith:B4OHZD3Y submitted 2026-06-24 astro-ph.HE

Bingyan Wang , Jumpei Takata This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords magneticwhitedwarfspaircreationcurvatureradiationpolarcapspacechargelimitedflowdeathlinerotationpoweredactivityquadrupolefield
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper models particle acceleration, curvature radiation, and magnetic pair creation in the polar cap regions of rapidly rotating magnetized white dwarfs. It uses the space-charge-limited flow model to study dependence on spin period and magnetic field, considering both dipole and combined dipole-quadrupole geometries. The quadrupole component reduces field line curvature radius and boosts the accelerating field, enhancing radiation and pair production. The resulting death line indicates pair creation is feasible only for P less than or equal to 100 seconds and B less than or equal to 10^10 G, making it difficult in known magnetic white dwarfs. This bears on whether these objects can exhibit pulsar-like rotation-powered activity or explain long-period radio transients.

What carries the argument

Space-charge-limited flow model applied to curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation processes, evaluated for both dipole and dipole-quadrupole field geometries.

What would settle it

Detection of pair-creation signatures or radio pulses from a magnetic white dwarf with spin period longer than 100 seconds and dipole field strength around or above 10^10 G would challenge the result.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Within the space-charge-limited flow framework, pair creation via curvature photons occurs for spin periods P less than or equal to 100 seconds when the dipole field is less than or equal to 10^10 G. Adding a quadrupole component reduces the curvature radius and strengthens the accelerating electric field, making pair creation more efficient. This leads to a death line for white dwarf pulsars that is more restrictive than previous estimates.

Load-bearing premise

The space-charge-limited flow model, together with the adopted treatment of curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation, remains valid when extrapolated from neutron-star pulsars to white-dwarf parameters and geometries.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation in the polar-cap region of magnetic white dwarfs using the space-charge-limited flow (SCLF) model. It performs one-dimensional numerical calculations and analytical estimates for both pure dipole and dipole-plus-quadrupole field geometries, derives the conditions for efficient pair production, and locates a death line in the P–B plane, concluding that pair creation occurs only for P ≲ 100 s when B_{*,d} ≲ 10^{10} G.

Significance. If the SCLF framework and its numerical implementation remain valid when extrapolated from neutron-star to white-dwarf radii and field strengths, the work supplies a more self-consistent treatment of the death line than earlier studies and would imply that rotation-powered pair cascades are difficult to sustain in observed magnetic white dwarfs, with direct implications for the WD interpretation of long-period radio transients.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central death-line result (abstract) is obtained from the same 1D SCLF numerical scheme whose free parameters (quadrupole amplitude, accelerating-field normalization) are adjusted to produce the reported P ≲ 100 s threshold; no independent external benchmark or observational constraint is supplied to break the circularity.
  2. [Abstract] No consistency check is reported in which the identical numerical scheme and analytic approximations for curvature radiation and magnetic pair production are applied to canonical neutron-star parameters (P ~ 1 s, B ~ 10^{12} G, R ~ 10^6 cm) to recover the known pulsar death line to within a factor of ~2; without this test the extrapolation to white-dwarf scales (R ~ 10^9 cm, B ~ 10^8–10^{10} G) carries an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty in the accelerating field, curvature radius, and pair-production optical depth.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract states that the calculations are one-dimensional and supplies no error bars, convergence tests with respect to grid resolution or integration tolerances, or explicit validation of the pair-creation threshold against known analytic limits.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the quadrupole field component amplitude should be defined explicitly when first introduced rather than left implicit in the description of field geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to improve the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central death-line result (abstract) is obtained from the same 1D SCLF numerical scheme whose free parameters (quadrupole amplitude, accelerating-field normalization) are adjusted to produce the reported P ≲ 100 s threshold; no independent external benchmark or observational constraint is supplied to break the circularity.

    Authors: The quadrupole component amplitude and the normalization of the accelerating field are indeed model parameters within the SCLF framework. These are selected based on physical motivations from neutron star studies and to investigate the effects of multipolar fields, rather than tuned specifically to achieve the P ≲ 100 s result. The death line emerges from the computed pair-creation threshold for those parameters. Nevertheless, we recognize the value of demonstrating robustness and will revise the manuscript to include a sensitivity analysis on these parameters and update the abstract to better describe the parameter selection process. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No consistency check is reported in which the identical numerical scheme and analytic approximations for curvature radiation and magnetic pair production are applied to canonical neutron-star parameters (P ~ 1 s, B ~ 10^{12} G, R ~ 10^6 cm) to recover the known pulsar death line to within a factor of ~2; without this test the extrapolation to white-dwarf scales (R ~ 10^9 cm, B ~ 10^8–10^{10} G) carries an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty in the accelerating field, curvature radius, and pair-production optical depth.

    Authors: We agree that performing a consistency check by applying the same numerical scheme to standard neutron star parameters would help validate the extrapolation and quantify systematic uncertainties. Although the underlying SCLF model and radiation processes are drawn from established pulsar literature, we did not include such a benchmark in the current work. We will incorporate this test in the revised version, applying the code to canonical pulsar values and comparing to the known death line. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that the calculations are one-dimensional and supplies no error bars, convergence tests with respect to grid resolution or integration tolerances, or explicit validation of the pair-creation threshold against known analytic limits.

    Authors: The manuscript describes one-dimensional calculations, and the abstract reflects this. We acknowledge that explicit convergence tests, error bars, and direct comparisons to analytic pair-creation thresholds are not presented. We will revise the methods section and abstract to include a brief report on numerical convergence and validation against analytic limits where applicable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; death line is direct numerical output of SCLF model applied to WD parameters

full rationale

The paper solves the space-charge-limited flow equations with curvature radiation and magnetic pair-production thresholds to locate the WD death line in the P–B plane. This is a forward computation from the adopted physical model and geometry (dipole or dipole+quadrupole), not a redefinition of inputs or a parameter fit whose output is then relabeled as a prediction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation whose validity is assumed without external support, nor is any ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The result follows from integrating the model equations for the stated WD radii, periods and fields; any concern about extrapolation from NS parameters is a question of model applicability rather than circularity in the derivation itself.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into exact parameter values and background assumptions; the ledger therefore records only the explicitly invoked modeling framework.

free parameters (1)
  • quadrupole field component amplitude
    Added to reduce curvature radius and enhance accelerating field; its specific magnitude is not stated in the abstract.
assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Space-charge-limited flow model governs particle acceleration in white-dwarf polar caps
    Explicitly adopted as the computational framework.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Study for curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation process on polar-cap region of magnetic white dwarf." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B4OHZD3Y

@misc{pith2026260625806,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Study for curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation process on polar-cap region of magnetic white dwarf},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B4OHZD3Y}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.25806}
}
abstract

Rapidly rotating, strongly magnetized white dwarfs (WDs) have been proposed as potential sites of rotation-powered activity analogous to that of a neutron star pulsar. In this study, we investigate particle acceleration, radiation processes, pair creation and resulting synchrotron radiation in the polar cap acceleration region. Within the framework of the space-charge-limited flow model, we examine how these processes depend on the spin period and surface magnetic field using both one-dimensional numerical calculations and analytical estimates. To explore the impact of the magnetic field geometry on the accelerating process, we consider both a pure dipole field and a combination of dipole and quadrupole fields. The inclusion of a quadrupole component reduces the curvature radius of the magnetic field lines, and significantly enhances the accelerating field, leading to more efficient radiation and pair creation processes. Using this framework, we evaluate the WD death line with a more consistent treatment of the relevant physical processes than the previous studies. We find that the pair creation process can occur for spin periods $P\lesssim100$~s, when the dipole field strength $B_{*,d}\lesssim10^{10}$~G, indicating that pair creation is difficult to sustain in currently known magnetic WDs. We discuss the implications of our model for rotation-powered activity in rapidly spinning isolated magnetic WDs and for the possible WD interpretation of long-period radio transients.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25806 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Configuration of the last-open field lines (solid curves) near the stellar surface for a magnetic field composed of dipole and quadrupole components. The dashed lines indicate the dipole and quadrupole axes, and the angles between the two axes are ζ = 0.5 rad (left panel) and 1.4 rad (right panel). The results are shown for B∗,q/B∗,d = 4, P = 100 s, and RWD = 5 × 108 cm. The circles represent the WD, and the spatial… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Left: Curvature radius near the WD surface as a function of the field-strength ratio β = B∗,q/B∗,d. Right: The non-corotational potential Φnco ∝ Φa  Bz B − Bz,∗ B∗  at r = 2RWD. The results are shown for different inclination angles ζ between the dipole and quadrupole axes and correspond to a field line at the center of the magnetic flux tube. The spin period is assumed to be P = 500 s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/fu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top panels: χm. Bottom panels: the corresponding MFP ℓm. The left and right panels show the results for photon energies of Eγ = 103 mec 2 and 104 mec 2 , respectively. 1 1 1 P  1 1 11         1   [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Maximum characteristic energy of curvature photons in RWD < r < 2RWD. Right: Total energy of curvature radiation emitted by a single accelerated electron. The results are shown for a dipole-field geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: illustrates how the pair creation multiplic￾ity (κ) depends on P and B∗,d. These results indicate that in a pure-dipole configuration, efficient pair produc￾tion occurs only for very fast rotators (P ∼ 1 s), such as those expected from remnants of double-WD merg￾ers (K…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pair multiplicity for the dipole–quadrupole configuration. Left: κ on the P–B∗,d plane for a fixed field-strength ratio of β = 5. Right: κ on the β–B∗,d plane for a fixed period of P = 10 s. The dashed lines show the death lines from equation (27) with fr = 0.2 and ρc …
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Contour plots of ℓacc + ℓm on the P–B∗,d plane. The results are shown for the dipole–quadrupole configuration with a field-strength ratio of β = 5. The dashed line indicates the analytical death line for fr = 0.2. APPENDIX A. DEATH LINE AND SYNCHROTRON-DOMINATED BOUNDA…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    1983, , 266, 215, 10.1086/160771

    Arons, J. 1983, ApJ, 266, 215, doi: 10.1086/160771

    work page doi:10.1086/160771 1983

  2. [2]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 702, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae041

    Bamba, A., Terada, Y., Kashiyama, K., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 702, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae041

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psae041 2024

  3. [3]

    J., & Arons, J

    Barnard, J. J., & Arons, J. 1982, ApJ, 254, 713, doi: 10.1086/159784

    work page doi:10.1086/159784 1982

  4. [4]

    2012, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 39, 065001, doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/065001

    Bednarek, W. 2012, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 39, 065001, doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/065001

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/065001 2012

  5. [5]

    S., Istomin A

    Beskin, V. S., & Istomin, A. Y. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 5084, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2423

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2423 2022

  6. [6]

    S., Litvinov P

    Beskin, V. S., & Litvinov, P. E. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 2572, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3575

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3575 2022

  7. [7]

    V., Rodrigues, C

    Borges, S. V., Rodrigues, C. V., Coelho, J. G., Malheiro, M., & Castro, M. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 895, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8add

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8add 2020

  8. [8]

    B., Fuller, J., et al

    Caiazzo, I., Burdge, K. B., Fuller, J., et al. 2021, Nature, 595, 39, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03615-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03615-y 2021

Show all 55 references
  1. [9]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x 17

    Caleb, M., Heywood, I., Rajwade, K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x 17

    2022 doi

  2. [10]

    1993, ApJ, 402, 264, doi: 10.1086/172129

    Chen, K., & Ruderman, M. 1993, ApJ, 402, 264, doi: 10.1086/172129

    1993 doi

  3. [11]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 3013, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf580

    Cheng, Y., & Takata, J. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 3013, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf580

    2025 doi

  4. [12]

    2024, ApJL, 974, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7e24

    Chernoglazov, A., Philippov, A., & Timokhin, A. 2024, ApJL, 974, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7e24

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    A., Caiazzo, I., Cunningham, T., et al

    Cristea, A. A., Caiazzo, I., Cunningham, T., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A188, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556432 de Ruiter, I., Rajwade, K. M., Bassa, C. G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 672, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02491-0

    2026 doi

  6. [14]

    2025, arXiv e-prin ts, arXiv:2509.03216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03216

    Desai, A., Caiazzo, I., Vennes, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prin ts, arXiv:2509.03216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03216

    2025 doi

  7. [15]

    A., Clarke, T., Curtin, A

    Dong, F. A., Clarke, T., Curtin, A. P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07480, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07480

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    1966, Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 626, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.626

    Erber, T. 1966, Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 626, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.626

    1966 doi

  9. [17]

    Euchner, F., Reinsch, K., Jordan, S., Beuermann, K., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. 2005, A&A, 442, 651, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053038 Garc ´ ıa-Berro, E., Lor´ en-Aguilar, P., Aznar-Sigu´ an, G., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/25

    2005 doi

  10. [18]

    Goldreich, P., & Julian, W. H. 1969, ApJ, 157, 869, doi: 10.1086/150119

    1969 doi

  11. [19]

    Harding, A. K. 2002, ApJ, 565, 482, doi: 10.1086/324535

    2002 doi

  12. [20]

    K., & Lai, D

    Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/R03

    2006 doi

  13. [21]

    K., & Muslimov, A

    Harding, A. K., & Muslimov, A. G. 2002, ApJ, 568, 862, doi: 10.1086/338985

    2002 doi

  14. [22]

    A., & Arons, J

    Hibschman, J. A., & Arons, J. 2001, ApJ, 560, 871, doi: 10.1086/323069

    2001 doi

  15. [23]

    2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    Hurley-Walker, N., Zhang, X., Bahramian, A., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    2022 doi

  16. [24]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5

    2023 doi

  17. [25]

    Ikhsanov, N. R. 1998, A&A, 338, 521

    1998

  18. [26]

    T., Garc ´ ıa-Berro, E., et al

    Ji, S., Fisher, R. T., Garc ´ ıa-Berro, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 77 3, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/136

    2013 doi

  19. [27]

    2011, PhRvD, 83, 023002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023002

    Kashiyama, K., Ioka, K., & Kawanaka, N. 2011, PhRvD, 83, 023002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023002

    2011 doi

  20. [28]

    Katz, J. I. 2022, Astrophysics and Space Science, 367, 108, doi: 10.1007/s10509-022-04174-2

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    Keane, E. F. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 865, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0603-0

    2018 doi

  22. [30]

    Lee, Y. W. J., Caleb, M., Murphy, T., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 393, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02452-z

    2025 doi

  23. [31]

    V., Coelho, J

    Malheiro, M., Borges, S. V., Coelho, J. G., et al. 2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 53, 100593, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100593

    2026 doi

  24. [32]

    R., G¨ ansicke, B

    Marsh, T. R., G¨ ansicke, B. T., H¨ ummerich, S., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 374, doi: 10.1038/nature18620

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    Martin, B., & Wickramasinghe, D. T. 1984, MNRAS, 206, 407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/206.2.407

    1984 doi

  26. [34]

    Muslimov, A., & Harding, A. K. 1997, ApJ, 485, 735, doi: 10.1086/304457

    1997 doi

  27. [35]

    2024, A&A, 691, A179, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451352

    Pakmor, R., Pelisoli, I., Justham, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A179, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451352

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    R., Buckley, D

    Pelisoli, I., Marsh, T. R., Buckley, D. A. H., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 931, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01995-x

    2023 doi

  29. [37]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10393, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10393

    Rea, N., Hurley-Walker, N., & Caleb, M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10393, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10393

    2026 doi

  30. [38]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    Rea, N., Hurley-Walker, N., Pardo-Araujo, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    Rodriguez, A. C. 2025, A&A, 695, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553684

    2025 doi

  32. [40]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.04232, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.04232

    Rose, K., Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.04232, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.04232

    2026 doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    A., & Sutherland, P

    Ruderman, M. A., & Sutherland, P. G. 1975, ApJ, 196, 51, doi: 10.1086/153393

    1975 doi

  34. [42]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (New York: Wiley)

    1979

  35. [43]

    T., Arons, J., & Fawley, W

    Scharlemann, E. T., Arons, J., & Fawley, W. M. 1978, ApJ, 222, 297, doi: 10.1086/156144

    1978 doi

  36. [44]

    F., Coelho, J

    Sousa, M. F., Coelho, J. G., de Araujo, J. C. N., Guidorzi, C., & Rueda, J. A. 2023, ApJ, 958, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad022f

    2023 doi

  37. [45]

    Sturrock, P. A. 1971, ApJ, 164, 529, doi: 10.1086/150865

    1971 doi

  38. [46]

    P., Lin, L

    Takata, J., Hu, C. P., Lin, L. C. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa23d

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    Takata, J., Yang, H., & Cheng, K. S. 2017, ApJ, 851, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b33

    2017 doi

  40. [48]

    M., Bassa, C

    Tan, C. M., Bassa, C. G., Cooper, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aade88

    2018 doi

  41. [49]

    N., & Harding, A

    Timokhin, A. N., & Harding, A. K. 2015, ApJ, 810, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/144

    2015 doi

  42. [50]

    Usov, V. V. 1988, Soviet Astronomy Letters, 14, 258

    1988

  43. [51]

    Usov, V. V. 2002, in Neutron Stars, Pulsars, and Supernova Remnants, ed. W. Becker, H. Lesch, & J. Tr¨ umper, 240, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0204402

    2002 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    A., Bagnulo, S., et al

    Valyavin, G., Wade, G. A., Bagnulo, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 466, doi: 10.1086/589234

    2008 doi

  45. [53]

    D., Ferrario, L., et al

    Vennes, S., Schmidt, G. D., Ferrario, L., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 1040, doi: 10.1086/376728 18

    2003 doi

  46. [54]

    Zhang, B., & Qiao, G. J. 1996, A&A, 310, 135

    1996

  47. [55]

    H., & Chang, P

    Zhu, C., Pakmor, R., van Kerkwijk, M. H., & Chang, P. 2015, ApJL, 806, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L1

    2015 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.