pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25806 · v1 · pith:B4OHZD3Ynew · submitted 2026-06-24 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Study for curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation process on polar-cap region of magnetic white dwarf

Bingyan Wang , Jumpei Takata This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords magnetic white dwarfspair creationcurvature radiationpolar capspace charge limited flowdeath linerotation powered activityquadrupole field
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pair creation in magnetic white dwarfs occurs only for spin periods shorter than about 100 seconds when dipole fields are below 10^10 gauss.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper models particle acceleration, curvature radiation, and magnetic pair creation in the polar cap regions of rapidly rotating magnetized white dwarfs. It uses the space-charge-limited flow model to study dependence on spin period and magnetic field, considering both dipole and combined dipole-quadrupole geometries. The quadrupole component reduces field line curvature radius and boosts the accelerating field, enhancing radiation and pair production. The resulting death line indicates pair creation is feasible only for P less than or equal to 100 seconds and B less than or equal to 10^10 G, making it difficult in known magnetic white dwarfs. This bears on whether these objects can exhibit pulsar-like rotation-powered activity or explain long-period radio transients.

Core claim

Within the space-charge-limited flow framework, pair creation via curvature photons occurs for spin periods P less than or equal to 100 seconds when the dipole field is less than or equal to 10^10 G. Adding a quadrupole component reduces the curvature radius and strengthens the accelerating electric field, making pair creation more efficient. This leads to a death line for white dwarf pulsars that is more restrictive than previous estimates.

What carries the argument

Space-charge-limited flow model applied to curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation processes, evaluated for both dipole and dipole-quadrupole field geometries.

Load-bearing premise

The space-charge-limited flow model, together with the adopted treatment of curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation, remains valid when extrapolated from neutron-star pulsars to white-dwarf parameters and geometries.

What would settle it

Detection of pair-creation signatures or radio pulses from a magnetic white dwarf with spin period longer than 100 seconds and dipole field strength around or above 10^10 G would challenge the result.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25806 by Bingyan Wang, Jumpei Takata.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Configuration of the last-open field lines (solid curves) near the stellar surface for a magnetic field composed of dipole and quadrupole components. The dashed lines indicate the dipole and quadrupole axes, and the angles between the two axes are ζ = 0.5 rad (left panel) and 1.4 rad (right panel). The results are shown for B∗,q/B∗,d = 4, P = 100 s, and RWD = 5 × 108 cm. The circles represent the WD, and t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: Curvature radius near the WD surface as a function of the field-strength ratio β = B∗,q/B∗,d. Right: The non-corotational potential Φnco ∝ Φa  Bz B − Bz,∗ B∗  at r = 2RWD. The results are shown for different inclination angles ζ between the dipole and quadrupole axes and correspond to a field line at the center of the magnetic flux tube. The spin period is assumed to be P = 500 s [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Top panels: χm. Bottom panels: the corresponding MFP ℓm. The left and right panels show the results for photon energies of Eγ = 103 mec 2 and 104 mec 2 , respectively. 1 1 1 P  1 1 11         1   [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Maximum characteristic energy of curvature photons in RWD < r < 2RWD. Right: Total energy of curvature radiation emitted by a single accelerated electron. The results are shown for a dipole-field geometry [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: illustrates how the pair creation multiplic￾ity (κ) depends on P and B∗,d. These results indicate that in a pure-dipole configuration, efficient pair produc￾tion occurs only for very fast rotators (P ∼ 1 s), such as those expected from remnants of double-WD merg￾ers (Kashiyama et al. 2011; Cheng & Takata 2025). In 1 1 1 P  1 1 11       1 P1 1 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Pair multiplicity for the dipole–quadrupole configuration. Left: κ on the P–B∗,d plane for a fixed field-strength ratio of β = 5. Right: κ on the β–B∗,d plane for a fixed period of P = 10 s. The dashed lines show the death lines from equation (27) with fr = 0.2 and ρc = 109 cm. The solid line in the left panel shows the approximate boundary (equation (A8)) above w hich synchrotron photons dominate the pair… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Contour plots of ℓacc + ℓm on the P–B∗,d plane. The results are shown for the dipole–quadrupole configuration with a field-strength ratio of β = 5. The dashed line indicates the analytical death line for fr = 0.2. APPENDIX A. DEATH LINE AND SYNCHROTRON-DOMINATED BOUNDARY OF MAGNETIC PAIR CREATION In this section, we examine the death line for magnetic pair creation in WD magnetospheres within the framework… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Rapidly rotating, strongly magnetized white dwarfs (WDs) have been proposed as potential sites of rotation-powered activity analogous to that of a neutron star pulsar. In this study, we investigate particle acceleration, radiation processes, pair creation and resulting synchrotron radiation in the polar cap acceleration region. Within the framework of the space-charge-limited flow model, we examine how these processes depend on the spin period and surface magnetic field using both one-dimensional numerical calculations and analytical estimates. To explore the impact of the magnetic field geometry on the accelerating process, we consider both a pure dipole field and a combination of dipole and quadrupole fields. The inclusion of a quadrupole component reduces the curvature radius of the magnetic field lines, and significantly enhances the accelerating field, leading to more efficient radiation and pair creation processes. Using this framework, we evaluate the WD death line with a more consistent treatment of the relevant physical processes than the previous studies. We find that the pair creation process can occur for spin periods $P\lesssim100$~s, when the dipole field strength $B_{*,d}\lesssim10^{10}$~G, indicating that pair creation is difficult to sustain in currently known magnetic WDs. We discuss the implications of our model for rotation-powered activity in rapidly spinning isolated magnetic WDs and for the possible WD interpretation of long-period radio transients.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates curvature radiation and magnetic pair creation in the polar-cap region of magnetic white dwarfs using the space-charge-limited flow (SCLF) model. It performs one-dimensional numerical calculations and analytical estimates for both pure dipole and dipole-plus-quadrupole field geometries, derives the conditions for efficient pair production, and locates a death line in the P–B plane, concluding that pair creation occurs only for P ≲ 100 s when B_{*,d} ≲ 10^{10} G.

Significance. If the SCLF framework and its numerical implementation remain valid when extrapolated from neutron-star to white-dwarf radii and field strengths, the work supplies a more self-consistent treatment of the death line than earlier studies and would imply that rotation-powered pair cascades are difficult to sustain in observed magnetic white dwarfs, with direct implications for the WD interpretation of long-period radio transients.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central death-line result (abstract) is obtained from the same 1D SCLF numerical scheme whose free parameters (quadrupole amplitude, accelerating-field normalization) are adjusted to produce the reported P ≲ 100 s threshold; no independent external benchmark or observational constraint is supplied to break the circularity.
  2. [Abstract] No consistency check is reported in which the identical numerical scheme and analytic approximations for curvature radiation and magnetic pair production are applied to canonical neutron-star parameters (P ~ 1 s, B ~ 10^{12} G, R ~ 10^6 cm) to recover the known pulsar death line to within a factor of ~2; without this test the extrapolation to white-dwarf scales (R ~ 10^9 cm, B ~ 10^8–10^{10} G) carries an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty in the accelerating field, curvature radius, and pair-production optical depth.
  3. [Abstract] The abstract states that the calculations are one-dimensional and supplies no error bars, convergence tests with respect to grid resolution or integration tolerances, or explicit validation of the pair-creation threshold against known analytic limits.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for the quadrupole field component amplitude should be defined explicitly when first introduced rather than left implicit in the description of field geometry.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to improve the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central death-line result (abstract) is obtained from the same 1D SCLF numerical scheme whose free parameters (quadrupole amplitude, accelerating-field normalization) are adjusted to produce the reported P ≲ 100 s threshold; no independent external benchmark or observational constraint is supplied to break the circularity.

    Authors: The quadrupole component amplitude and the normalization of the accelerating field are indeed model parameters within the SCLF framework. These are selected based on physical motivations from neutron star studies and to investigate the effects of multipolar fields, rather than tuned specifically to achieve the P ≲ 100 s result. The death line emerges from the computed pair-creation threshold for those parameters. Nevertheless, we recognize the value of demonstrating robustness and will revise the manuscript to include a sensitivity analysis on these parameters and update the abstract to better describe the parameter selection process. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] No consistency check is reported in which the identical numerical scheme and analytic approximations for curvature radiation and magnetic pair production are applied to canonical neutron-star parameters (P ~ 1 s, B ~ 10^{12} G, R ~ 10^6 cm) to recover the known pulsar death line to within a factor of ~2; without this test the extrapolation to white-dwarf scales (R ~ 10^9 cm, B ~ 10^8–10^{10} G) carries an uncontrolled systematic uncertainty in the accelerating field, curvature radius, and pair-production optical depth.

    Authors: We agree that performing a consistency check by applying the same numerical scheme to standard neutron star parameters would help validate the extrapolation and quantify systematic uncertainties. Although the underlying SCLF model and radiation processes are drawn from established pulsar literature, we did not include such a benchmark in the current work. We will incorporate this test in the revised version, applying the code to canonical pulsar values and comparing to the known death line. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] The abstract states that the calculations are one-dimensional and supplies no error bars, convergence tests with respect to grid resolution or integration tolerances, or explicit validation of the pair-creation threshold against known analytic limits.

    Authors: The manuscript describes one-dimensional calculations, and the abstract reflects this. We acknowledge that explicit convergence tests, error bars, and direct comparisons to analytic pair-creation thresholds are not presented. We will revise the methods section and abstract to include a brief report on numerical convergence and validation against analytic limits where applicable. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; death line is direct numerical output of SCLF model applied to WD parameters

full rationale

The paper solves the space-charge-limited flow equations with curvature radiation and magnetic pair-production thresholds to locate the WD death line in the P–B plane. This is a forward computation from the adopted physical model and geometry (dipole or dipole+quadrupole), not a redefinition of inputs or a parameter fit whose output is then relabeled as a prediction. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation whose validity is assumed without external support, nor is any ansatz or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The result follows from integrating the model equations for the stated WD radii, periods and fields; any concern about extrapolation from NS parameters is a question of model applicability rather than circularity in the derivation itself.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields limited visibility into exact parameter values and background assumptions; the ledger therefore records only the explicitly invoked modeling framework.

free parameters (1)
  • quadrupole field component amplitude
    Added to reduce curvature radius and enhance accelerating field; its specific magnitude is not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Space-charge-limited flow model governs particle acceleration in white-dwarf polar caps
    Explicitly adopted as the computational framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5774 in / 1352 out tokens · 16070 ms · 2026-06-25T20:19:00.759348+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 51 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    1983, ApJ, 266, 215, doi: 10.1086/160771

    Arons, J. 1983, ApJ, 266, 215, doi: 10.1086/160771

    work page doi:10.1086/160771 1983

  2. [2]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 702, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae041

    Bamba, A., Terada, Y., Kashiyama, K., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 702, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae041

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psae041 2024

  3. [3]

    J., & Arons, J

    Barnard, J. J., & Arons, J. 1982, ApJ, 254, 713, doi: 10.1086/159784

    work page doi:10.1086/159784 1982

  4. [4]

    2012, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 39, 065001, doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/065001

    Bednarek, W. 2012, Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics, 39, 065001, doi: 10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/065001

    work page doi:10.1088/0954-3899/39/6/065001 2012

  5. [5]

    S., & Istomin, A

    Beskin, V. S., & Istomin, A. Y. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 5084, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2423

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2423 2022

  6. [6]

    S., & Litvinov, P

    Beskin, V. S., & Litvinov, P. E. 2022, MNRAS, 510, 2572, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3575

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stab3575 2022

  7. [7]

    V., Rodrigues, C

    Borges, S. V., Rodrigues, C. V., Coelho, J. G., Malheiro, M., & Castro, M. 2020, The Astrophysical Journal, 895, 26, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8add

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab8add 2020

  8. [8]

    B., Fuller, J., et al

    Caiazzo, I., Burdge, K. B., Fuller, J., et al. 2021, Nature, 595, 39, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03615-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03615-y 2021

  9. [9]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x 17

    Caleb, M., Heywood, I., Rajwade, K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x 17

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01688-x 2022

  10. [10]

    1993, ApJ, 402, 264, doi: 10.1086/172129

    Chen, K., & Ruderman, M. 1993, ApJ, 402, 264, doi: 10.1086/172129

    work page doi:10.1086/172129 1993

  11. [11]

    2025, MNRAS, 539, 3013, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf580

    Cheng, Y., & Takata, J. 2025, MNRAS, 539, 3013, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf580

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staf580 2025

  12. [12]

    2024, ApJL, 974, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7e24

    Chernoglazov, A., Philippov, A., & Timokhin, A. 2024, ApJL, 974, L32, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad7e24

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad7e24 2024

  13. [13]

    A., Caiazzo, I., Cunningham, T., et al

    Cristea, A. A., Caiazzo, I., Cunningham, T., et al. 2026, A&A, 706, A188, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556432 de Ruiter, I., Rajwade, K. M., Bassa, C. G., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 672, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02491-0

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202556432 2026

  14. [14]

    2025, arXiv e-prin ts, arXiv:2509.03216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03216

    Desai, A., Caiazzo, I., Vennes, S., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prin ts, arXiv:2509.03216, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2509.03216

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.03216 2025

  15. [15]

    A., Clarke, T., Curtin, A

    Dong, F. A., Clarke, T., Curtin, A. P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.07480, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.07480

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.07480 2024

  16. [16]

    1966, Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 626, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.626

    Erber, T. 1966, Reviews of Modern Physics, 38, 626, doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.626

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.38.626 1966

  17. [17]

    Euchner, F., Reinsch, K., Jordan, S., Beuermann, K., & G¨ ansicke, B. T. 2005, A&A, 442, 651, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053038 Garc ´ ıa-Berro, E., Lor´ en-Aguilar, P., Aznar-Sigu´ an, G., et al. 2012, The Astrophysical Journal, 749, 25, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/25

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053038 2005

  18. [18]

    Goldreich, P., & Julian, W. H. 1969, ApJ, 157, 869, doi: 10.1086/150119

    work page doi:10.1086/150119 1969

  19. [19]

    Harding, A. K. 2002, ApJ, 565, 482, doi: 10.1086/324535

    work page doi:10.1086/324535 2002

  20. [20]

    K., & Lai, D

    Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/R03

    work page doi:10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/r03 2006

  21. [21]

    K., & Muslimov, A

    Harding, A. K., & Muslimov, A. G. 2002, ApJ, 568, 862, doi: 10.1086/338985

    work page doi:10.1086/338985 2002

  22. [22]

    A., & Arons, J

    Hibschman, J. A., & Arons, J. 2001, ApJ, 560, 871, doi: 10.1086/323069

    work page doi:10.1086/323069 2001

  23. [23]

    2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    Hurley-Walker, N., Zhang, X., Bahramian, A., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 526, doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04272-x 2022

  24. [24]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06202-5 2023

  25. [25]

    Ikhsanov, N. R. 1998, A&A, 338, 521

    1998

  26. [26]

    T., Garc ´ ıa-Berro, E., et al

    Ji, S., Fisher, R. T., Garc ´ ıa-Berro, E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 77 3, 136, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/773/2/136

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/773/2/136 2013

  27. [27]

    2011, PhRvD, 83, 023002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023002

    Kashiyama, K., Ioka, K., & Kawanaka, N. 2011, PhRvD, 83, 023002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.83.023002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.83.023002 2011

  28. [28]

    Katz, J. I. 2022, Astrophysics and Space Science, 367, 108, doi: 10.1007/s10509-022-04174-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10509-022-04174-2 2022

  29. [29]

    Keane, E. F. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 865, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0603-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-018-0603-0 2018

  30. [30]

    Lee, Y. W. J., Caleb, M., Murphy, T., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 393, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02452-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-024-02452-z 2025

  31. [31]

    V., Coelho, J

    Malheiro, M., Borges, S. V., Coelho, J. G., et al. 2026, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 53, 100593, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100593

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2026.100593 2026

  32. [32]

    R., G¨ ansicke, B

    Marsh, T. R., G¨ ansicke, B. T., H¨ ummerich, S., et al. 2016, Nature, 537, 374, doi: 10.1038/nature18620

    work page doi:10.1038/nature18620 2016

  33. [33]

    Martin, B., & Wickramasinghe, D. T. 1984, MNRAS, 206, 407, doi: 10.1093/mnras/206.2.407

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/206.2.407 1984

  34. [34]

    Muslimov, A., & Harding, A. K. 1997, ApJ, 485, 735, doi: 10.1086/304457

    work page doi:10.1086/304457 1997

  35. [35]

    2024, A&A, 691, A179, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451352

    Pakmor, R., Pelisoli, I., Justham, S., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A179, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451352

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451352 2024

  36. [36]

    R., Buckley, D

    Pelisoli, I., Marsh, T. R., Buckley, D. A. H., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 931, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-01995-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-023-01995-x 2023

  37. [37]

    2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10393, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10393

    Rea, N., Hurley-Walker, N., & Caleb, M. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.10393, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2601.10393

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.10393 2026

  38. [38]

    2024, ApJ, 961, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    Rea, N., Hurley-Walker, N., Pardo-Araujo, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 214, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad165d 2024

  39. [39]

    Rodriguez, A. C. 2025, A&A, 695, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553684

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202553684 2025

  40. [40]

    Periodic Radio and X-ray Emission from an Accreting White Dwarf Binary

    Rose, K., Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2606.04232, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2606.04232

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2606.04232 2026

  41. [41]

    A., & Sutherland, P

    Ruderman, M. A., & Sutherland, P. G. 1975, ApJ, 196, 51, doi: 10.1086/153393

    work page doi:10.1086/153393 1975

  42. [42]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative Processes in Astrophysics (New York: Wiley)

    1979

  43. [43]

    T., Arons, J., & Fawley, W

    Scharlemann, E. T., Arons, J., & Fawley, W. M. 1978, ApJ, 222, 297, doi: 10.1086/156144

    work page doi:10.1086/156144 1978

  44. [44]

    F., Coelho, J

    Sousa, M. F., Coelho, J. G., de Araujo, J. C. N., Guidorzi, C., & Rueda, J. A. 2023, ApJ, 958, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad022f

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad022f 2023

  45. [45]

    Sturrock, P. A. 1971, ApJ, 164, 529, doi: 10.1086/150865

    work page doi:10.1086/150865 1971

  46. [46]

    P., Lin, L

    Takata, J., Hu, C. P., Lin, L. C. C., et al. 2018, ApJ, 853, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa23d

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa23d 2018

  47. [47]

    Takata, J., Yang, H., & Cheng, K. S. 2017, ApJ, 851, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b33

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9b33 2017

  48. [48]

    M., Bassa, C

    Tan, C. M., Bassa, C. G., Cooper, S., et al. 2018, ApJ, 866, 54, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aade88

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aade88 2018

  49. [49]

    N., & Harding, A

    Timokhin, A. N., & Harding, A. K. 2015, ApJ, 810, 144, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/810/2/144

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/810/2/144 2015

  50. [50]

    Usov, V. V. 1988, Soviet Astronomy Letters, 14, 258

    1988

  51. [51]

    Usov, V. V. 2002, in Neutron Stars, Pulsars, and Supernova Remnants, ed. W. Becker, H. Lesch, & J. Tr¨ umper, 240, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0204402

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/0204402 2002

  52. [52]

    A., Bagnulo, S., et al

    Valyavin, G., Wade, G. A., Bagnulo, S., et al. 2008, ApJ, 683, 466, doi: 10.1086/589234

    work page doi:10.1086/589234 2008

  53. [53]

    D., Ferrario, L., et al

    Vennes, S., Schmidt, G. D., Ferrario, L., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 1040, doi: 10.1086/376728 18

    work page doi:10.1086/376728 2003

  54. [54]

    Zhang, B., & Qiao, G. J. 1996, A&A, 310, 135

    1996

  55. [55]

    H., & Chang, P

    Zhu, C., Pakmor, R., van Kerkwijk, M. H., & Chang, P. 2015, ApJL, 806, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/L1

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/806/1/l1 2015