pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26789 · v1 · pith:PBGVBY6Hnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ⚛️ physics.ao-ph

Spectral condensation in a finite nonequilibrium atmospheric transition

Dan Zhao , Yongwen Zhang , Teng Liu , Wenqi Liu , Jingfang Fan , Xiaosong Chen This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 02:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ao-ph
keywords sudden stratospheric warmingspectral condensationeigen microstatesnonequilibrium transitionpolar vortexorder parameterMarchenko-Pastur
0
0 comments X

The pith

Sudden stratospheric warmings show spectral condensation then decondensation and recondensation in their eigen-microstate occupations.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that nonequilibrium transitions lacking a Hamiltonian or thermodynamic limit can still be tracked by the entropy of an emergent sector in the spectrum of data-derived eigen-microstates. Applied to an event-aligned ensemble of 51 sudden stratospheric warmings, the method isolates a low-entropy polar-vortex regime that gives way to a high-entropy period of competing states before settling into a reorganized weak-vortex configuration. The same entropy maximum and collapse appear in a stochastic wave-mean-flow model driven by upward wave-activity flux. This positions the entropy measure as an order-parameter-like diagnostic for finite atmospheric reorganizations.

Core claim

The event-aligned ensemble undergoes spectral condensation, decondensation and recondensation: a polar-vortex state dominated by a few eigen-microstates gives way to a high-entropy regime of competing emergent states before selecting a reorganized weak-vortex state. Eigen Microstate Theory combined with a Marchenko-Pastur baseline isolates the emergent sector whose entropy quantifies the competition and serves as the diagnostic.

What carries the argument

Entropy of the emergent sector isolated by the Marchenko-Pastur random-matrix baseline from the eigen-microstate occupation spectrum.

If this is right

  • The entropy maximum marks the point of greatest competition among collective states during polar-vortex breakdown.
  • The stochastic wave-mean-flow model reproduces the entropy peak, collapse and top-down timing when upward wave-activity flux is supplied as the control coordinate.
  • Polar-vortex breakdown belongs to a broader class of finite nonequilibrium phase reorganizations diagnosable by the same spectral method.
  • Emergent-sector entropy supplies a state-based spectral diagnostic for transitions in non-Hamiltonian systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same entropy diagnostic could be tested on other high-dimensional nonequilibrium records such as ocean or climate tipping events to check whether condensation-decondensation patterns appear generically.
  • If the Marchenko-Pastur separation remains stable across datasets, the approach offers a route to order parameters extracted directly from observations rather than from assumed governing equations.
  • Varying the number of retained eigen-microstates or the random-matrix threshold in controlled simulations would show how sensitive the entropy peak is to the isolation step.

Load-bearing premise

The Marchenko-Pastur random-matrix baseline correctly isolates an emergent sector whose entropy functions as an order-parameter-like diagnostic without post-hoc tuning to the specific atmospheric events.

What would settle it

If the emergent-sector entropy fails to reach a clear maximum at the transition time in the 51 ERA5 events or in the stochastic model when wave-activity flux is varied, the claim that entropy tracks the reorganization would not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26789 by Dan Zhao, Jingfang Fan, Teng Liu, Wenqi Liu, Xiaosong Chen, Yongwen Zhang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spectral signatures of phase-transition organization in the EMT–MP frame￾work. a, Representative configurations of the two-dimensional Ising model below, near and above the transition regime, showing ordered, heterogeneous and disordered phase organization. b, EMT maps the ensemble matrix X to an occupation probability spectrum through SVD, with pk = σ 2 k / P j σ 2 j and SEMT = − P k pk ln pk. c, The Marc… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Order–disorder–order phase evolution of SSWs in an event-aligned ensemble. a, Composite evolution of the total eigen-microstate entropy SEMT at 10, 20, 30 and 50 hPa across 51 major SSWs. Day 0 denotes the CP07 central date, defined by the first reversal of the zonal￾mean zonal wind at 60◦N and 10 hPa; the grey dashed curve shows the corresponding wind index U10. b, Emergent-sector entropy Seg, whose trans… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Entropy–wind phase portrait and reduced critical-flux interpretation. a, Schematic wind–flux relation in the reduced wave–mean-flow threshold framework. The idealized upward wave-activity flux F, analogous to an Eliassen–Palm flux, decelerates the vortex from Uref toward a critical state (Uc, Fc); beyond this point the strong-westerly branch gives way to a weak￾or reversed-wind state. b, ERA5 event-aligned… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Stochastic wave–mean-flow model reproduces the flux-controlled SSW phase transition. a, Emergent-sector entropy Seg in the stochastic model at four pressure-level ana￾logues. The peak-and-collapse sequence reproduces the order–disorder–order transition and follows a top-down timing consistent with the critical-flux framework. b, Wind–flux relation showing up￾ward wave-activity flux F as the explicit contro… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Order parameters are difficult to define in high-dimensional nonequilibrium systems that lack a Hamiltonian, a thermodynamic limit or an observed control coordinate. Here we show that such transitions can be diagnosed from the spectrum of occupations over data-derived eigen-microstates. We combine Eigen Microstate Theory with a Marchenko--Pastur random-matrix baseline to isolate an emergent sector, whose entropy quantifies competition among statistically significant collective states. As a finite atmospheric realization, we analyse 51 sudden stratospheric warmings in ERA5. The event-aligned ensemble undergoes spectral condensation, decondensation and recondensation: a polar-vortex state dominated by a few eigen-microstates gives way to a high-entropy regime of competing emergent states before selecting a reorganized weak-vortex state. A stochastic wave--mean-flow model, in which upward wave-activity flux provides a reduced control coordinate, reproduces the same entropy maximum, collapse and top-down timing. These results identify emergent-sector entropy as an order-parameter-like, state-based spectral diagnostic for non-Hamiltonian transitions and place polar-vortex breakdown within a broader class of finite nonequilibrium phase reorganizations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that transitions in high-dimensional nonequilibrium systems without Hamiltonians or thermodynamic limits can be diagnosed via the Shannon entropy of an emergent sector isolated from the occupation spectrum of data-derived eigen-microstates. Eigen Microstate Theory is combined with a Marchenko-Pastur random-matrix baseline to separate signal from noise; the resulting entropy is presented as an order-parameter-like diagnostic of competition among collective states. Analysis of 51 sudden stratospheric warming events in ERA5 shows a condensation–decondensation–recondensation sequence in the event-aligned ensemble, with a polar-vortex state giving way to a high-entropy regime before reorganizing into a weak-vortex state. A stochastic wave–mean-flow model with upward wave-activity flux as control coordinate reproduces the entropy maximum, collapse, and top-down timing.

Significance. If the central claim is substantiated, the work supplies a concrete spectral diagnostic for finite nonequilibrium reorganizations that lack conventional order parameters. The demonstration on ERA5 reanalysis data for a well-studied atmospheric phenomenon, together with reproduction in a reduced stochastic model, provides an empirical anchor. The approach could generalize to other high-dimensional systems where collective states compete without an obvious control parameter.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on eigen-microstate analysis and Marchenko-Pastur baseline] The Marchenko-Pastur baseline is central to isolating the emergent sector whose entropy serves as the diagnostic (abstract and the section on eigen-microstate analysis). The law assumes i.i.d. entries in the underlying matrix, yet ERA5 fields are spatially and temporally correlated and the event-alignment procedure imposes additional structure. No surrogate-data test or robustness check against correlation-preserving null models is described, leaving open the possibility that the reported condensation sequence partly reflects residual correlations rather than genuine emergent-sector competition.
  2. [Section on entropy as diagnostic] The claim that emergent-sector entropy functions as an order-parameter-like quantity rests on the entropy maximum coinciding with the transition (abstract). Without an explicit comparison to alternative baselines (e.g., eigenvalue thresholding or shuffled ensembles) or a demonstration that the entropy peak is insensitive to the precise Marchenko-Pastur edge location, it remains unclear whether the diagnostic is robust or partly shaped by the baseline choice.
minor comments (2)
  1. The first use of 'SSW' should be spelled out; subsequent abbreviations are then clear.
  2. Figure captions should explicitly state the number of events (51) and the alignment procedure so that readers can assess the ensemble size without returning to the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the robustness of the Marchenko-Pastur baseline and the entropy diagnostic. We address each point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The Marchenko-Pastur baseline is central to isolating the emergent sector whose entropy serves as the diagnostic (abstract and the section on eigen-microstate analysis). The law assumes i.i.d. entries in the underlying matrix, yet ERA5 fields are spatially and temporally correlated and the event-alignment procedure imposes additional structure. No surrogate-data test or robustness check against correlation-preserving null models is described, leaving open the possibility that the reported condensation sequence partly reflects residual correlations rather than genuine emergent-sector competition.

    Authors: We acknowledge that ERA5 reanalysis fields contain spatial and temporal correlations and that event alignment adds structure, so the strict i.i.d. assumption of the Marchenko-Pastur law is an approximation. The baseline is employed as a conservative noise threshold rather than an exact null model. In the revised manuscript we will add surrogate tests that preserve spatial and temporal correlations (phase-randomized Fourier surrogates and block-bootstrap resampling of the event-aligned ensemble) to confirm that the emergent-sector isolation and the condensation-decondensation-recondensation sequence remain statistically significant beyond these correlations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim that emergent-sector entropy functions as an order-parameter-like quantity rests on the entropy maximum coinciding with the transition (abstract). Without an explicit comparison to alternative baselines (e.g., eigenvalue thresholding or shuffled ensembles) or a demonstration that the entropy peak is insensitive to the precise Marchenko-Pastur edge location, it remains unclear whether the diagnostic is robust or partly shaped by the baseline choice.

    Authors: The entropy maximum is observed to align with the known dynamical transition in both the ERA5 ensemble and the stochastic wave-mean-flow model. To demonstrate robustness, the revised manuscript will include (i) direct comparisons of the entropy diagnostic against simple eigenvalue-thresholding and fully shuffled ensembles and (ii) a sensitivity analysis showing that the location and height of the entropy peak remain stable under small shifts of the Marchenko-Pastur edge (within the range of finite-sample corrections). These additions will clarify that the reported behavior is not an artifact of the precise baseline choice. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation uses external baselines and independent model reproduction

full rationale

The provided abstract and context describe combining Eigen Microstate Theory with the standard Marchenko-Pastur law (an external random-matrix result) to isolate an emergent sector from ERA5 data, then computing its Shannon entropy as a diagnostic. A separate stochastic wave-mean-flow model is shown to reproduce the entropy sequence. No quoted equations or steps reduce by construction to the inputs (no self-definitional loops, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no load-bearing self-citations, and no ansatz smuggled via prior work). The central claim rests on data analysis plus an independent reduced model, remaining self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on Eigen Microstate Theory supplying meaningful data-derived states and on the Marchenko-Pastur law providing an appropriate null model for isolating emergent collective behavior in finite atmospheric ensembles.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Eigen Microstate Theory yields statistically meaningful eigen-microstates from the atmospheric data
    Invoked to define the spectrum whose occupations are analyzed.
  • domain assumption Marchenko-Pastur distribution correctly separates noise from emergent collective states in this finite ensemble
    Used to isolate the sector whose entropy is treated as the diagnostic.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5732 in / 1360 out tokens · 34544 ms · 2026-06-26T02:19:26.895551+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lev D. Landau. On the theory of phase transitions.Phys. Z. Sowjetunion, 11:26–35, 1937

    1937

  2. [2]

    Eugene Stanley.Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena

    H. Eugene Stanley.Introduction to Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena. Oxford Uni- versity Press, Oxford, 1971

    1971

  3. [3]

    Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1992

    Nigel Goldenfeld.Lectures on Phase Transitions and the Renormalization Group, volume 85 ofFrontiers in Physics. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 1992. doi: 10.1201/9780429493492

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429493492 1992

  4. [4]

    Hohenberg and Bertrand I

    Pierre C. Hohenberg and Bertrand I. Halperin. Theory of dynamic critical phenomena.Rev. Mod. Phys., 49:435–479, 1977. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.49.435. 13

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.49.435 1977

  5. [5]

    Cross and Pierre C

    Mark C. Cross and Pierre C. Hohenberg. Pattern formation outside of equilibrium.Rev. Mod. Phys., 65:851–1112, 1993. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.65.851

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.65.851 1993

  6. [6]

    Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states.Adv

    Haye Hinrichsen. Non-equilibrium critical phenomena and phase transitions into absorbing states.Adv. Phys., 49:815–958, 2000. doi: 10.1080/00018730050198152

    work page doi:10.1080/00018730050198152 2000

  7. [7]

    Brock, Victor Brovkin, Stephen R

    Marten Scheffer, Jordi Bascompte, William A. Brock, Victor Brovkin, Stephen R. Carpenter, Vasilis Dakos, Hermann Held, Egbert H. van Nes, Max Rietkerk, and George Sugihara. Early- warning signals for critical transitions.Nature, 461:53–59, 2009. doi: 10.1038/nature08227

    work page doi:10.1038/nature08227 2009

  8. [8]

    van Nes, Victor Brovkin, Vladimir Petoukhov, and Hermann Held

    Vasilis Dakos, Marten Scheffer, Egbert H. van Nes, Victor Brovkin, Vladimir Petoukhov, and Hermann Held. Slowing down as an early warning signal for abrupt climate change.Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 105:14308–14312, 2008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802430105

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.0802430105 2008

  9. [9]

    Lenton, Valerie N

    Timothy M. Lenton, Valerie N. Livina, Vasilis Dakos, Egbert H. van Nes, and Marten Scheffer. Early warning of climate tipping points from critical slowing down: comparing methods to improve robustness.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370:1185–1204, 2012. doi: 10.1098/rsta.2011.0304

    work page doi:10.1098/rsta.2011.0304 2012

  10. [10]

    Carpenter, William A

    Vasilis Dakos, Stephen R. Carpenter, William A. Brock, Aaron M. Ellison, Vishwesha Guttal, Anthony R. Ives, Sonia K’efi, Valerie Livina, David A. Seekell, Egbert H. van Nes, and Marten Scheffer. Methods for detecting early warnings of critical transitions in time series illustrated using simulated ecological data.PLoS ONE, 7:e41010, 2012. doi: 10.1371/jou...

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041010 2012

  11. [11]

    Ambiguity of early warning signals for climate tipping points.Nat

    Max Rietkerk, Vanessa Skiba, Els Weinans, Rapha¨ el H´ ebert, and Thomas Laepple. Ambiguity of early warning signals for climate tipping points.Nat. Clim. Chang., 15:479–488, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41558-025-02328-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41558-025-02328-8 2025

  12. [12]

    Blaschke, Nils Bochow, Chris A

    Niklas Boers, Teng Liu, Sebastian Bathiany, Maya Ben-Yami, Lana L. Blaschke, Nils Bochow, Chris A. Boulton, Timothy M. Lenton, Andreas Morr, Da Nian, Martin Rypdal, and Taylor Smith. Destabilization of earth system tipping elements.Nat. Geosci., 18:949–960, 2025. doi: 10.1038/s41561-025-01787-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41561-025-01787-0 2025

  13. [13]

    Die explosionsartigen stratosph¨ arenerw¨ armungen des sp”atwinters 1951/52

    Richard Scherhag. Die explosionsartigen stratosph¨ arenerw¨ armungen des sp”atwinters 1951/52. Ber. Dtsch. Wetterdienstes US-Zone, 6(38):51–63, 1952

    1951

  14. [14]

    Butler, Dian J

    Amy H. Butler, Dian J. Seidel, Steven C. Hardiman, Neal Butchart, Thomas Birner, and Aaron Match. Defining sudden stratospheric warmings.Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96:1913– 1928, 2015. doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00173.1

    work page doi:10.1175/bams-d-13-00173.1 1913

  15. [15]

    Baldwin, Blanca Ayarzag¨ uena, Thomas Birner, Neal Butchart, Amy H

    Mark P. Baldwin, Blanca Ayarzag¨ uena, Thomas Birner, Neal Butchart, Amy H. Butler, An- drew J. Charlton-Perez, Daniela I. V. Domeisen, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Hella Garny, Edwin P. Gerber, et al. Sudden stratospheric warmings.Rev. Geophys., 59:e2020RG000708, 2021. doi: 10.1029/2020RG000708

    work page doi:10.1029/2020rg000708 2021

  16. [16]

    A dynamical model of the stratospheric sudden warming.J

    Taroh Matsuno. A dynamical model of the stratospheric sudden warming.J. Atmos. Sci., 28: 1479–1494, 1971. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028⟨1479:ADMOTS⟩2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1971)028 1971

  17. [17]

    Andrews, James R

    David G. Andrews, James R. Holton, and Conway B. Leovy.Middle Atmosphere Dynam- ics, volume 40 ofInternational Geophysics Series. Academic Press, San Diego, 1987. ISBN 9780120585762. 14

    1987

  18. [18]

    Polvani and Darryn W

    Lorenzo M. Polvani and Darryn W. Waugh. Upward wave activity flux as a precursor to extreme stratospheric events and subsequent anomalous surface weather regimes.J. Clim., 17: 3548–3554, 2004. doi: 10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017⟨3548:UWAFAA⟩2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2004)017 2004

  19. [19]

    Thomas Birner and John R. Albers. Sudden stratospheric warmings and anomalous upward wave activity flux.SOLA, 13A:8–12, 2017. doi: 10.2151/sola.13A-002

    work page doi:10.2151/sola.13a-002 2017

  20. [20]

    Holton and Clifford Mass

    James R. Holton and Clifford Mass. Stratospheric vacillation cycles.J. Atmos. Sci., 33: 2218–2225, 1976. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033⟨2218:SVC⟩2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1976)033 1976

  21. [21]

    Alan Plumb

    R. Alan Plumb. Instability of the distorted polar night vortex: a theory of stratospheric warmings.J. Atmos. Sci., 38:2514–2531, 1981. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038⟨2514: IOTDPN⟩2.0.CO;2

    work page doi:10.1175/1520-0469(1981)038 1981

  22. [22]

    Scott and Lorenzo M

    Richard K. Scott and Lorenzo M. Polvani. Internal variability of the winter stratosphere. Part I: time-independent forcing.J. Atmos. Sci., 63:2758–2776, 2006. doi: 10.1175/JAS3797.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jas3797.1 2006

  23. [23]

    Albers, Thomas Birner, Rolando R

    ’Alvaro de la C´ amara, John R. Albers, Thomas Birner, Rolando R. Garcia, Peter Hitch- cock, Douglas E. Kinnison, and Anne K. Smith. Sensitivity of sudden stratospheric warm- ings to previous stratospheric conditions.J. Atmos. Sci., 74:2857–2877, 2017. doi: 10.1175/ JAS-D-17-0136.1

    2017

  24. [24]

    ’Alvaro de la C´ amara, Thomas Birner, and John R. Albers. Are sudden stratospheric warmings preceded by anomalous tropospheric wave activity?J. Clim., 32:7173–7189, 2019. doi: 10. 1175/JCLI-D-19-0269.1

    2019

  25. [25]

    Charlton and Lorenzo M

    Andrew J. Charlton and Lorenzo M. Polvani. A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part I: climatology and modeling benchmarks.J. Clim., 20:449–469, 2007. doi: 10.1175/ JCLI3996.1

    2007

  26. [26]

    Matthewman, James G

    Nicholas J. Matthewman, James G. Esler, Andrew J. Charlton-Perez, and Lorenzo M. Polvani. A new look at stratospheric sudden warmings. Part III: polar vortex evolution and vertical structure.J. Clim., 22:1566–1585, 2009. doi: 10.1175/2008JCLI2365.1

    work page doi:10.1175/2008jcli2365.1 2009

  27. [27]

    A new interpretation of vortex-split sudden stratospheric warmings in terms of equilibrium statistical mechanics.J

    Yuki Yasuda, Freddy Bouchet, and Antoine Venaille. A new interpretation of vortex-split sudden stratospheric warmings in terms of equilibrium statistical mechanics.J. Atmos. Sci., 74:3915–3936, 2017. doi: 10.1175/JAS-D-17-0045.1

    work page doi:10.1175/jas-d-17-0045.1 2017

  28. [28]

    Noboru Nakamura, Jonathan Falk, and Sandro W. Lubis. Why are stratospheric sudden warmings sudden (and intermittent)?J. Atmos. Sci., 77:943–964, 2020. doi: 10.1175/ JAS-D-19-0249.1

    2020

  29. [29]

    Condensation of eigen microstate in statistical ensemble and phase transition.Sci

    Gaoke Hu, Teng Liu, Maoxin Liu, Wei Chen, and Xiaosong Chen. Condensation of eigen microstate in statistical ensemble and phase transition.Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 62: 990511, 2019. doi: 10.1007/s11433-018-9353-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s11433-018-9353-x 2019

  30. [30]

    Eigen microstates and their evolutions in complex systems.Com- mun

    Yu Sun, Gaoke Hu, Yongwen Zhang, Bo Lu, Zhenghui Lu, Jingfang Fan, Xiaoteng Li, Qimin Deng, and Xiaosong Chen. Eigen microstates and their evolutions in complex systems.Com- mun. Theor. Phys., 73:065603, 2021. doi: 10.1088/1572-9494/abf127

    work page doi:10.1088/1572-9494/abf127 2021

  31. [31]

    Eigen microstates in self-organized criticality.Phys

    Yongwen Zhang, Maoxin Liu, Gaoke Hu, Teng Liu, and Xiaosong Chen. Eigen microstates in self-organized criticality.Phys. Rev. E, 109:044130, 2024. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.109.044130. 15

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.109.044130 2024

  32. [32]

    Marchenko and Leonid A

    Vladimir A. Marchenko and Leonid A. Pastur. Distribution of eigenvalues for some sets of ran- dom matrices.Math. USSR-Sb., 1:457–483, 1967. doi: 10.1070/SM1967v001n04ABEH001994

    work page doi:10.1070/sm1967v001n04abeh001994 1967

  33. [33]

    Else- vier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 3 edition, 2004

    Madan Lal Mehta.Random Matrices, volume 142 ofPure and Applied Mathematics. Else- vier/Academic Press, Amsterdam, 3 edition, 2004. ISBN 9780120884094

    2004

  34. [34]

    Ab- sorbing and reflecting sudden stratospheric warming events and their relationship with tropo- spheric circulation.J

    Kunihiko Kodera, Hitoshi Mukougawa, Pascal Maury, Hiroaki Ueda, and Chantal Claud. Ab- sorbing and reflecting sudden stratospheric warming events and their relationship with tropo- spheric circulation.J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 121:80–94, 2016. doi: 10.1002/2015JD023359

    work page doi:10.1002/2015jd023359 2016

  35. [35]

    White, Chaim I

    Ian P. White, Chaim I. Garfinkel, Judah Cohen, Martin Jucker, and Jian Rao. The impact of split and displacement sudden stratospheric warmings on the troposphere.J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 126:e2020JD033989, 2021. doi: 10.1029/2020JD033989

    work page doi:10.1029/2020jd033989 2021

  36. [36]

    Stratospheric polar vortex, wave absorption/reflection and effect on surface climate.Clim

    Abdel Hannachi, Maximilian Lechner, Katharina Finke, and Dmitry Mukhin. Stratospheric polar vortex, wave absorption/reflection and effect on surface climate.Clim. Dyn., 63:126,

  37. [37]

    doi: 10.1007/s00382-025-07610-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00382-025-07610-1

  38. [38]

    Sorting sudden stratospheric warmings with the downward tro- pospheric influence using ERA5 and CESM2-WACCM.Atmos

    Rongzhao Lu and Jian Rao. Sorting sudden stratospheric warmings with the downward tro- pospheric influence using ERA5 and CESM2-WACCM.Atmos. Chem. Phys., 26:3723–3742,

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.5194/acp-26-3723-2026

    work page doi:10.5194/acp-26-3723-2026 2026

  40. [40]

    Peter Hitchcock and Peter H. Haynes. Stratospheric control of planetary waves.Geophys. Res. Lett., 43:11884–11892, 2016. doi: 10.1002/2016GL071372

    work page doi:10.1002/2016gl071372 2016

  41. [41]

    Phase transition revealed by eigen microstate entropy, 2025

    Teng Liu, Xuezhi Niu, Mingli Zhang, Gaoke Hu, Yuhan Chen, Yongwen Zhang, Rui Shi, Jingyuan Li, Peng Tan, Maoxin Liu, Hui Li, and Xiaosong Chen. Phase transition revealed by eigen microstate entropy, 2025. URLhttps://arxiv.org/abs/2512.23086. 16 f K s g a Spin configurations =1 ≈2.269 =3.5 b ensemble matrix X U Σ V T pk =σ k2 /Σ j σj2 SEMT = - Σk pk lnp k ...

    arXiv 2025