pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27108 · v1 · pith:XGH5UMYOnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

A possible approach to overcome the saturation of the neutron yield in a Plasma Focus and to achieve breakeven

Andrea Di Vita This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 02:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords plasma focusneutron yield saturationfilamentationdynamic resistancebreakevenradial magnetic fielddeuterium-tritiumplasma sheath
0
0 comments X

The pith

Suppressing spontaneous filamentation in the plasma sheath prevents saturation and enables breakeven in a 10 MJ Plasma Focus.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews models of neutron yield saturation in Plasma Focus devices and connects saturation to spontaneous filamentation in the plasma sheath during rundown. This filamentation is said to control dynamic resistance and thereby limit power transfer from the condenser bank for energies above 0.5 MJ. Suppressing the filamentation with an applied radial magnetic field is proposed to remove the limit. The approach is claimed to multiply the drive parameter by at least a factor of three. This would permit breakeven in a 224 kV, 10 MJ device operating with deuterium-tritium fuel.

Core claim

Together, the model of saturation in terms of dynamic resistance and the 1993 model of spontaneous filamentation in the sheath lead to the conclusion that suppression of such filamentation prevents saturation, multiplies the PF drive parameter by a factor 3 at least and allows breakeven in a 224 kV, 10 MJ Plasma Focus working with DT. Suppression is achieved by superimposing a radial magnetic field of 1.4 T generated by suitably located magnets whose layout resembles that in a Hall thruster.

What carries the argument

Spontaneous filamentation of the plasma sheath during rundown, which rules the dynamic resistance and thereby the power supply from the condenser bank to the plasma.

If this is right

  • Neutron yield saturation is prevented for condenser bank energies above 0.5 MJ.
  • The PF drive parameter is multiplied by a factor of at least 3.
  • Breakeven is achievable in a 224 kV, 10 MJ Plasma Focus device with DT fuel.
  • A 1.4 T radial magnetic field is sufficient to suppress many known filamentation instabilities.
  • High temperature superconducting magnets can generate the field at current densities too low to trigger quenching.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the proposed magnet layout transfers successfully from Hall thruster geometry, similar stabilization could be tested in other coaxial plasma configurations.
  • Elimination of the saturation limit would allow existing PF scaling relations to be re-examined at reactor-relevant stored energies.
  • A direct test could compare dynamic resistance and neutron output in medium-energy PF shots with and without the 1.4 T radial field.

Load-bearing premise

The 1993 model of spontaneous filamentation in the plasma sheath is the dominant mechanism controlling dynamic resistance and saturation, and a radial magnetic field of 1.4 T suppresses the relevant instabilities without introducing new limitations.

What would settle it

Measurement of whether neutron yield in a Plasma Focus continues to rise with bank energy above 0.5 MJ when a 1.4 T radial magnetic field is applied during the rundown phase.

read the original abstract

Saturation of the neutron yield with increasing energy of the condenser bank in a Plasma Focus led to the shutdown of PF research focussed on controlled nuclear fusion in the past. We review available models of saturation and develop further the model of Lee S., Applied Phys. Lett. 95, 151503, 2009. This model relies on the well-known and generally accepted model of Lee S., J. Fusion Energy 2014, 33, 319 of Plasma Focus discharges and describes saturation in terms of the dynamic resistance, i.e. the rate of change of PF inductance due to the motion of the plasma sheath during rundown. A model of this sheath discussed in Di Vita A., J. Plasma Physics, 1993, 50, 1 shows that its spontaneous filamentation rules the dynamic resistance, spoiling the power supply from the condenser bank to the plasma at the values of condenser bank energy above 0.5 MJ values which are relevant to a fusion reactor. Together, these two models lead to the conclusion that suppression of such filamentation prevents saturation, multiplies the PF drive parameter by a factor 3 at least and allows breakeven in a 224 kV, 10 MJ Plasma Focus working with DT. We can suppress filamentation by superimposing a radial magnetic field to the interelectrode region of the Plasma Focus where rundown occurs. A conservative estimate shows that a 1.4 T radial magnetic field is enough to suppress many known filamentation instabilities. Suitably located magnets can generate this field. Their layout resembles the layout of the sources of radial magnetic field in the cylindrical geometry of a Hall thruster for space propulsion. For high temperature superconducting magnets, the required current density is too small to trigger quenching.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reviews models of neutron yield saturation in Plasma Focus devices, extending Lee's 2009 dynamic-resistance model (based on plasma-sheath motion during rundown) by combining it with the author's 1993 filamentation model. It argues that spontaneous filamentation in the sheath dominates dynamic resistance above ~0.5 MJ, spoiling power transfer. The central claim is that superimposing a radial magnetic field of 1.4 T suppresses these instabilities, prevents saturation, multiplies the drive parameter by a factor of at least 3, and enables breakeven in a 224 kV, 10 MJ DT device. Suppression is proposed via magnets arranged like those in Hall thrusters, feasible with high-temperature superconductors.

Significance. If the asserted quantitative link between filamentation suppression and a factor-of-3 drive-parameter increase holds without new loss channels, the work would be significant for reviving PF fusion research by addressing the historical saturation barrier at reactor-relevant energies. The proposal of a practical radial-field geometry is a concrete engineering suggestion. However, the manuscript contains no new derivation, scaling analysis, or numerical verification of the factor 3 or breakeven condition.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the two cited models 'lead to the conclusion' of a drive-parameter multiplication by a factor of at least 3 and breakeven at 10 MJ is stated without any explicit scaling relation, derivation, or numerical check connecting the 1993 filamentation growth rates to the dynamic-resistance term in the 2009 Lee model or to the neutron-yield formula.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The 'conservative estimate' of a 1.4 T radial field sufficient to suppress the relevant filamentation instabilities is given without supporting calculations of instability thresholds, growth rates, or an analysis showing that the applied field introduces no new power-loss mechanisms or discharge limitations.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that filamentation 'rules the dynamic resistance' above 0.5 MJ and that its suppression multiplies the drive parameter by ≥3 rests entirely on the linkage between the 1993 and 2009 models; no quantitative mapping or sensitivity test of this proportionality is provided in the manuscript.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, clarifying the connections between the cited models while acknowledging where additional detail can strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the two cited models 'lead to the conclusion' of a drive-parameter multiplication by a factor of at least 3 and breakeven at 10 MJ is stated without any explicit scaling relation, derivation, or numerical check connecting the 1993 filamentation growth rates to the dynamic-resistance term in the 2009 Lee model or to the neutron-yield formula.

    Authors: The linkage is developed in the main text by showing that the filamentation growth rates and resulting sheath structure from the 1993 model directly control the rate of inductance change (dynamic resistance) in the 2009 Lee model for bank energies above 0.5 MJ. Removing this effect restores the full drive-parameter scaling of the Lee model, yielding the stated multiplication factor of at least 3 and the breakeven estimate at 10 MJ for DT. The abstract condenses this reasoning; we will insert a short explicit scaling paragraph in revision to make the mapping transparent without new derivations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The 'conservative estimate' of a 1.4 T radial field sufficient to suppress the relevant filamentation instabilities is given without supporting calculations of instability thresholds, growth rates, or an analysis showing that the applied field introduces no new power-loss mechanisms or discharge limitations.

    Authors: The 1.4 T figure is obtained from the marginal-stability thresholds already calculated in the 1993 Di Vita model for the dominant filamentation modes at typical PF sheath parameters above 0.5 MJ. We agree that an explicit check for new loss channels (e.g., additional resistive or radiative terms) is desirable and will add a short paragraph demonstrating that the radial field, at the proposed strength and geometry, primarily damps the filamentation without opening significant new power-loss pathways. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that filamentation 'rules the dynamic resistance' above 0.5 MJ and that its suppression multiplies the drive parameter by ≥3 rests entirely on the linkage between the 1993 and 2009 models; no quantitative mapping or sensitivity test of this proportionality is provided in the manuscript.

    Authors: The 2009 Lee model already identifies dynamic resistance as the dominant saturation mechanism; the 1993 model supplies the physical origin (filamentation) and its energy dependence. The factor-of-3 multiplication follows from the ratio of drive parameters with and without the filamentation contribution in the regime where the 1993 growth rates exceed the rundown timescale. While a formal sensitivity scan is not performed, the proportionality is fixed by the published parameter ranges of both models. We will add a brief statement of the applicable energy window in revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Central breakeven claim reduces to self-cited 1993 filamentation model plus asserted factor-of-3 scaling without explicit derivation

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "A model of this sheath discussed in Di Vita A., J. Plasma Physics, 1993, 50, 1 shows that its spontaneous filamentation rules the dynamic resistance, spoiling the power supply from the condenser bank to the plasma at the values of condenser bank energy above 0.5 MJ values which are relevant to a fusion reactor. Together, these two models lead to the conclusion that suppression of such filamentation prevents saturation, multiplies the PF drive parameter by a factor 3 at least and allows breakeven in a 224 kV, 10 MJ Plasma Focus working with DT."

    The quantitative conclusion (factor-of-3 multiplication and breakeven) is asserted to follow from combining the Lee 2009 model with the 1993 self-cited work, yet the paper exhibits no derivation or scaling equation that converts filamentation suppression into the stated numerical factor or breakeven threshold; the controlling role of filamentation is defined by the prior self-work.

full rationale

The paper's abstract states that the Lee 2009 saturation model combined with the Di Vita 1993 sheath model 'lead to the conclusion' of a factor-of-3 drive-parameter increase and breakeven at 10 MJ. The load-bearing premise that spontaneous filamentation rules dynamic resistance above 0.5 MJ is imported solely via the 1993 self-citation, with no independent scaling relation or derivation supplied in the present text connecting instability suppression to the numerical factor 3 or the neutron-yield breakeven condition. This matches the self-citation load-bearing pattern; the rest of the argument (radial B-field estimate, Lee model review) does not independently establish the quantitative mapping.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on two domain models (Lee 2009 saturation via dynamic resistance; Di Vita 1993 filamentation control of that resistance) plus the untested assumption that radial field application will suppress the instabilities at the stated strength; no new free parameters beyond the 1.4 T estimate or invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • radial magnetic field strength = 1.4 T
    Conservative estimate stated as sufficient to suppress many known filamentation instabilities
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Lee 2009 model correctly describes saturation in terms of dynamic resistance from plasma sheath motion
    The paper reviews and develops further this model as the basis for saturation at high condenser bank energies
  • domain assumption Di Vita 1993 model of spontaneous filamentation in the plasma sheath is accurate and determines the dynamic resistance
    Invoked to explain why power supply from the bank is spoiled above 0.5 MJ

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5855 in / 1653 out tokens · 37811 ms · 2026-06-26T02:07:31.143468+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 21 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Mather, J.W.: Formation of a high-density deuterium plasma focus. Phys. Fluids 8(2), 366 (1965)

    1965

  2. [2]

    Methods of Exp

    Mather, J.W.: Dense plasma focus. Methods of Exp. Phys.9B, 187–249 (1971)

    1971

  3. [3]

    Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), Krak´ ow (2014)

    Scholz, M.: Plasma-Focus and Controlled Nuclear Fusion. Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), Krak´ ow (2014)

    2014

  4. [4]

    Plasma4, 450–669 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ plasma4030033

    Auluck, S.K.H., Kubes, P., Paduch, M., Sadowski, M.J., Krauz, V.I., Lee, S., Soto, L., Scholz, M., Miklaszewski, R., Schmidt, H.,et al.: Update on the scientific status of the plasma focus. Plasma4, 450–669 (2021) https://doi.org/10.3390/ plasma4030033

    2021

  5. [5]

    Plasma Phys

    Haines, M.: A review of the dense Z-pinch. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion53, 093001 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/53/9/093001

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/53/9/093001 2011

  6. [6]

    IEEE Trans

    Pavez, C., Soto, L.: Demonstration of X-ray emission from an ultraminia- ture pinch plasma focus discharge operating at 0.1 J nanofocus. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science38(5), 1132–1135 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2010. 2045110

    work page doi:10.1109/tps.2010 2010

  7. [7]

    In: Panarella, E

    Brzosko, J.S., Degnan, J.H., Filippov, N.V., Freeman, B.L., Kiutlu, G.F., Mather, J.W.: Comments on the feasibility of achieving scientific break- even with a plasma focus machine. In: Panarella, E. (ed.) Current Trends in International Fusion Research, pp. 11–32. Springer, Boston, USA (1997). https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4615-5867-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-5867-5 1997

  8. [8]

    In: Brunelli, B.,et al.(eds.) Unconventional Approaches to Fusion

    Rager, J.P.: The plasma focus. In: Brunelli, B.,et al.(eds.) Unconventional Approaches to Fusion. Plenum, New York (1982)

    1982

  9. [9]

    Impurity seeding for tokamak power exhaust: from present devices via ITER to DEMO

    Soto, L.: New trends and future perspectives on plasma focus research. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion47, 361–381 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/ 47/5A/027

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/ 2005

  10. [10]

    Applied Phys

    Lee, S.: Neutron yield saturation in plasma focus: A fundamental cause. Applied Phys. Lett.95, 151503 (2009)

    2009

  11. [11]

    Nature Scientific 29 Reports15, 23048 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07939-x

    Damideh, V.,et al.: Experimental results and analysis of plasma dynamics and radiation output of the 100 kV dense plasma focus FAETON-I. Nature Scientific 29 Reports15, 23048 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07939-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-07939-x 2025

  12. [12]

    Plasma Physics Reports33(4), 271–277 (2007)

    Nukulin, V.Y., Polukhin, S.N.: Saturation of the neutron yield from megajoule plasma focus facilities. Plasma Physics Reports33(4), 271–277 (2007)

    2007

  13. [13]

    Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection1, 33–37 (2005)

    Angeli, E.,et al.: Production of radioisotopes within a plasma focus device. Nuclear Technology and Radiation Protection1, 33–37 (2005)

    2005

  14. [14]

    Pro- ceedings of the Physical Society

    Lawson, J.D.: Some criteria for a power producing thermonuclear reactor. Pro- ceedings of the Physical Society. Section B70, 6–10 (1957) https://doi.org/10. 1088/0370-1301/70/1/303

    1957

  15. [15]

    Acta Physica Polonica A138(4), 613–621 (2020) https://doi.org/10

    Sadowski, M.J.,et al.: Recent achievements of plasma studies within PF-1000U facility. Acta Physica Polonica A138(4), 613–621 (2020) https://doi.org/10. 12693/APhysPolA.138.613

    2020

  16. [16]

    Zucker, O., Bostick, W., Long, J., Luce, J., Sahlin, H.: The plasma focus as a large fluence neutron source. Nucl. Instrum. Methods145, 85–190 (1977)

    1977

  17. [17]

    Herold, H., Jerzykiewicz, A., Sadowski, M., Schmidt, H.: Comparative analysis of large plasma focus experiments performed at IPF, stuttgart, and at IPJ, ´ swierk. Nucl. Fusion29(8), 1255–1269 (1999)

    1999

  18. [18]

    Physics of Plasmas30, 080701 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0157626

    Auluck, S.K.H.: On the failure of neutron yield scaling in the dense plasma focus. Physics of Plasmas30, 080701 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0157626

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0157626 2023

  19. [19]

    IEEE Trans

    Krishnan, M.: The dense plasma focus: A versatile dense pinch for diverse applications. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science40(12), 3189–3221 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2012.2222676

    work page doi:10.1109/tps.2012.2222676 2012

  20. [20]

    Master’s thesis, Texas A&M Uni- versity (2004)

    Hardy, R.L.: The plasma focus as a thruster. Master’s thesis, Texas A&M Uni- versity (2004). https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/ c50dbc44-b999-4490-a6a6-06bab2ada2af/content

    2004

  21. [21]

    In: El-Genk, M.S

    Thomas, R.,et al.: Advancements in dense plasma focus (DPF) for space propul- sion. In: El-Genk, M.S. (ed.) Space Technology Applications International Forum

  22. [22]

    Proc., vol

    American Institute of Physics Conf. Proc., vol. 746, pp. 536–543 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1867170

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1867170 2005

  23. [23]

    Housley, D., et al.: Effect of insulator surface conditioning on the pinch dynamics and X-ray production of a Ne filled dense plasma focus. J. Applied Phys.129(22) (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Hahn, E.N.: Effect of insulator length and fill pressure on filamentation and neu- tron production in a 4.6 kV dense plasma focus. Phys. Plasmas29, 083508 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0087901

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0087901 2022

  25. [25]

    IEEE Trans

    Nardi, V., Bortolotti, A., Brzosko, J.S., Esper, M., Luo, C.M., Pedrielli, F., Powell, 30 C., Zeng, D.: Stimulated acceleration and confinement of deuterons in focused discharges - part I. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Sci.16(3), 368 (1988)

    1988

  26. [26]

    Nardi, V., Bilbao, L., Brzosko, J.S., Powell, C., Zeng, D., Bortolotti, A., Mezzetti, F., Robouch, V.: Stimulated acceleration and confinement of deuterons in focused discharges - part II. Trans. on Plasma Sci.16(3), 374 (1988)

    1988

  27. [27]

    In: Nardi, V., Sahlin, H., Bostick, W.H

    Gratton, F., Vargas, J.M.: Two-dimensional electromechanical model of the plasma focus. In: Nardi, V., Sahlin, H., Bostick, W.H. (eds.) Energy Storage, Compression and Switching, Vol. II, pp. 353–386. Plenum, New York (1983)

    1983

  28. [28]

    Goyon, C.,et al.: Neutron generation dynamics inside a MA-class dense plasma focus Z-pinch. Phys. Plasmas32, 033105 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    Lerner, E.J., Hassan, S.M., Karamitsos, I., Von Roessel, F.: Confined ion energy >200 kev and increased fusion yield in a DPF with monolithic tungsten electrodes and pre-ionization. Phys. of Plasmas24, 102708 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1063/ 1.4989859

    2017

  30. [30]

    Lerner, E.J., Yousefi, H.R.: Runaway electrons as a source of impurity and reduced fusion yield in the dense plasma focus. Phys. Plasmas21, 102706 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1063/1.4898733

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4898733 2014

  31. [31]

    Lerner, E.J., et al.: Focus fusion: Overview of progress towards p- 11B fusion with the dense plasma focus. J. Fusion Energy42(7) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10894-023-00345-z

    2023

  32. [32]

    Bostick, W.H., Nardi, V., Prior, W.: Production and confinement of high-density plasmas. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.251, 2–29 (1975)

    1975

  33. [33]

    Haines, M.: Ion viscous heating in a magnetohydrodynamically unstable Z pinch at over 2·10 9 kelvin. Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 075003 (2006)

    2006

  34. [34]

    Baalrud, S.D.: Constraints of radiation loss on thermonuclear reactor designs based on burning p-11B in a dense plasma focus. Phys. Plasmas32, 102709 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0292235

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0292235 2025

  35. [36]

    Lee, S.: Plasma focus radiative model: Review of the Lee model code. J. Fusion Energy33, 319–335 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-014-9683-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10894-014-9683-8 2014

  36. [37]

    Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 54(Suppl

    Scholz, M.,et al.: The physics of a plasma focus. Czechoslovak Journal of Physics 54(Suppl. C), 170–185 (2004)

    2004

  37. [38]

    Di Vita, A.: The filamentary structure in the accelerating plasma sheath of a 31 plasma focus: a simplified three-dimensional analysis. J. Plasma Physics50(1), 1–19 (1993)

    1993

  38. [39]

    Auluck, S.K.H.: On filamentation in the dense plasma focus. Phys. Plasmas29, 030703 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085870

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0085870 2022

  39. [40]

    IEEE Trans

    Kwek, K.H., Tou, T.Y., Lee, S.: Current sheath structure of the plasma focus in the run-down phase. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science18(5), 826–830 (1990)

    1990

  40. [41]

    Auluck, S.K.H.: On the representation of dense plasma focus as a circuit element. Phys. Plasmas28, 030703 (2021)

    2021

  41. [42]

    Joint ICTP-IAEA Work- shop on Dense Magnetized Plasma and Plasma Diagnostics, 15 - 26 November 2010 Trieste, Italy (2010)

    Lee, S., Saw, S.H.: Introduction to the Plasma Focus. Joint ICTP-IAEA Work- shop on Dense Magnetized Plasma and Plasma Diagnostics, 15 - 26 November 2010 Trieste, Italy (2010)

    2010

  42. [43]

    Plasma Phys

    Lee, S.: Current and neutron scaling for megajoule plasma focus machines. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion50, 105005 (2008)

    2008

  43. [44]

    Plasma Phys

    Pavez, C.,et al.: New evidence about the nature of plasma filaments in plasma accelerators of type plasma-focus. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion65, 015003 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6587/aca358

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aca358 2023

  44. [45]

    Auluck, S.K.H.: Poloidal magnetic field in the dense plasma focus. Phys. Plasmas 31, 010704 (2024)

    2024

  45. [46]

    Potter, D.E.: Numerical studies of the plasma focus. Phys. Fluids14(9), 1911– 1923 (1971)

    1911

  46. [47]

    Plasmas21, 72702 (2014)

    Soto, L., Pavez, C., Castillo, F., Veloso, F., Moreno, J., Auluck, S.K.H.: Fila- mentary structures in dense plasma focus: Current filaments or vortex filaments? Phys. Plasmas21, 72702 (2014)

    2014

  47. [48]

    Physics of Plasmas16, 122504 (2009) https://doi

    Auluck, S.K.H.: Description of plasma focus current sheath as the Turner relaxed state of a Hall magnetofluid. Physics of Plasmas16, 122504 (2009) https://doi. org/10.1063/1.3270112

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3270112 2009

  48. [49]

    Plasma Phys

    Bergmans, J., Kuvshinov, B.N., Lakhin, V.P., Schep, T.J., Westerhof, E.: Current- vortex filaments in magnetized plasmas. Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion41, 709– 717 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1088/0741-3335/41/3A/064

    work page doi:10.1088/0741-3335/41/3a/064 1999

  49. [50]

    International J

    Bostick, W.H.: The morphology of the electron. International J. Fusion Energy 3(1), 9–52 (1985)

    1985

  50. [51]

    In: Fokas, A.S.,et al.(eds.) Nonlinear Processes in Physics

    Petviashvili, V.I.: Dynamics of vortex-current filaments in MHD plasma. In: Fokas, A.S.,et al.(eds.) Nonlinear Processes in Physics. Springer Series in Non- linear Dynamics. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/ 978-3-642-77769-1 58 .https://doi.org 32

    1993

  51. [52]

    Fusion Technology12(1), 92–103 (1987)

    Bostick, W.H.: Similarities between the plasma vortex filaments (relativistic and nonrelativistic) observed in the plasma focus and in conventional relativistic electron-beam machines. Fusion Technology12(1), 92–103 (1987)

    1987

  52. [53]

    Plasma Phys.22, 1039–1041 (1980)

    Sestero, A., Robouch, B.V., Podda, S.: Suggested relaxation of plasma focus discharges to helical force-free configurations. Plasma Phys.22, 1039–1041 (1980)

    1980

  53. [54]

    Di Vita, A.: Hot spots and filaments in the pinch of a plasma focus: a uni- fied approach. Eur. Phys. J. D54, 451–461 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1140/epjd/ e2009-00092-x

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/ 2009

  54. [55]

    Casanova, F.,et al.: Toroidal high-density singularity in a small plasma focus. J. Fusion Energy31, 279–283 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-011-9469-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s10894-011-9469-1 2012

  55. [56]

    IEEE Trans

    Turner, L.: Hall effects on magnetic relaxation. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science 14(6), 849–857 (1986) https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.1986.4316633

    work page doi:10.1109/tps.1986.4316633 1986

  56. [57]

    Di Vita, A.: A lower bound on Hartmann number for relaxed plasmas described by Taylor’s principle. Eur. Phys. J. D56, 205–208 (2010) https://doi.org/10. 1140/epjd/e2009-00294-2

    2010

  57. [58]

    Nikulin, V.Y.,et al.: Supersonic, subsonic and stationary filaments in the plasma focus. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.907, 012024 (2017)

    2017

  58. [59]

    Acta Physica Polonica A138(4), 622–625 (2020)

    Nikulin, V.Y.,et al.: Structures and generation of current filaments in plasma focus. Acta Physica Polonica A138(4), 622–625 (2020)

    2020

  59. [60]

    In: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 36th, Huntsville, AL, USA (2000)

    Di Vita, A., Paganucci, F., Rossetti, P., Andrenucci, M.: Spontaneous symme- try breaking in MPD plasmas. In: AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit, 36th, Huntsville, AL, USA (2000)

    2000

  60. [61]

    IEEE Trans

    Lee, S., Serban, A.: Dimensions and lifetime of the plasma focus pinch. IEEE Trans. Plasma Science24(3), 1101–1105 (1996)

    1996

  61. [62]

    In: Nardi, V., Sahlin, H., Bostick, W.H

    Ferro Fontan, C., Sicardi Schifino, A.: Generation of kilogauss radial magnetic fields in the plasma focus current sheath. In: Nardi, V., Sahlin, H., Bostick, W.H. (eds.) Energy Storage, Compression and Switching, Vol. 2, p. 607. Plenum, New York, NY, USA (1983)

    1983

  62. [63]

    (ed.): 2023 NRL Plasma Formulary

    Beresnyak, A. (ed.): 2023 NRL Plasma Formulary. U.S. Office of Naval Research, ??? (2023)

    2023

  63. [64]

    Fruchtman, A., Strauss, H.R.: Thermomagnetic instability in a magnetized plasma. Phys. Fluids B4(6), 1397–1400 (1992)

    1992

  64. [65]

    In: 35th EPS Conference on Plasma Phys

    Stockem, A.,et al.: Suppression of the filamentation instability by a flow-aligned magnetic field. In: 35th EPS Conference on Plasma Phys. ECA Vol., vol. 32D, pp. 2–174. Hersonissos (2008) 33

    2008

  65. [66]

    Physics of Plasmas18(8) (2011)

    Bret, A., Perez Alvaro, E.: Robustness of the filamentation instability as shock mediator in arbitrarily oriented magnetic field. Physics of Plasmas18(8) (2011)

    2011

  66. [67]

    Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics (1989-1993)1, 598 (1989) https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.859207

    Bud’ko, A.B.,et al.: Stability analysis of dynamic Z pinches and theta pinches. Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics (1989-1993)1, 598 (1989) https://doi.org/ 10.1063/1.859207

    work page doi:10.1063/1.859207 1989

  67. [68]

    IEEE Trans

    Mikitchuk, D.,et al.: Mitigation of instabilities in a Z-pinch plasma by a preem- bedded axial magnetic field. IEEE Trans. on Plasma Science42(10), 2524–2525 (2014)

    2014

  68. [69]

    JPL Space Science and Technology Series

    Goebel, D.M., Katz, I.: Fundamentals of Electric Propulsion: Ion and Hall Thrusters. JPL Space Science and Technology Series. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey (2008).https://nasa.gov

    2008

  69. [70]

    Instruments and Experimental Techniques69(1), 73–90 (2026)

    Mikhailov, Y.V., Prokuratova, I.A., Lemeshko, B.D.: Physical processes in sealed plasma focus chambers that limit their service life. Instruments and Experimental Techniques69(1), 73–90 (2026)

    2026

  70. [71]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion63(12), 125013 (2021)

    Oreshkin, V.I., Oreshkin, E.V.: Effect of the plasma self-radiation on the growth of thermal filamentation instabilities in imploding Z pinches. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion63(12), 125013 (2021)

    2021

  71. [72]

    Journal of Fusion Energy42, 16 (2023)

    Takeda, S., Keeley, A.R., Managi, S.: How many years away is fusion energy? A review. Journal of Fusion Energy42, 16 (2023)

    2023

  72. [73]

    Nature Energy (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41560-026-02023-8

    Tang, L.X., Noll, B., Panda, A., Tobias, S.S.: Fusion power experi- ence rates are overestimated. Nature Energy (2026) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41560-026-02023-8

    2026

  73. [74]

    Nukleonika46(Supplement 1), 81–84 (2001)

    Zoita, V., Lungu, S.: A fusion-fission hybrid reactor driven by high-density pinch plasmas. Nukleonika46(Supplement 1), 81–84 (2001)

    2001

  74. [75]

    IAEA TM Synergies Between Nuclear Fusion Technology Developments and Advanced Nuclear Fission Technologies, Vienna, Austria (2022)

    Soto, L., Clausse, A., Friedli, C., Altamirano, L.: The Concept of Plasma Focus driven Fusion-Fission Hybrid Reactors. IAEA TM Synergies Between Nuclear Fusion Technology Developments and Advanced Nuclear Fission Technologies, Vienna, Austria (2022). https://iaea.org

    2022

  75. [76]

    Nature - Scientific Communications15, 14081 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96736-7 34

    Sadat Kiai, S.M.,et al.: Double 3 MJ dense plasma focus for thermonuclear drive inertial confinement fusion. Nature - Scientific Communications15, 14081 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96736-7 34

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-025-96736-7 2025