pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27493 · v1 · pith:DWJ6QJNJnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

SU(4) Heisenberg model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice

I. V. Lukin , A. G. Sotnikov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 01:00 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords SU(4) Heisenberg modelhyperhoneycomb latticeprojected entangled pair statesspin liquidquantum spin liquidloop expansionfrustrated magnetism
0
0 comments X

The pith

The SU(4) Heisenberg model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice has a gapless spin-liquid ground state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies three-dimensional projected entangled pair states to the SU(4) Heisenberg model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice. It shows that loop expansions can be used to compute physical observables and that these expansions converge quickly on tree-like lattices. Extrapolations of the data to infinite bond dimension indicate that the ground state is gapless. A sympathetic reader would care because this points to an exotic quantum phase without conventional magnetic order or a spin gap.

Core claim

Using three-dimensional projected entangled pair states, the ground state of the SU(4) Heisenberg model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice is studied. Loop expansions allow computation of observables and converge quickly on this lattice. Extrapolations to infinite bond dimensions point toward a gapless spin-liquid ground state.

What carries the argument

Three-dimensional projected entangled pair states combined with loop expansions for observables on the hyperhoneycomb lattice

If this is right

  • The ground state remains gapless in the infinite-bond-dimension limit.
  • Loop expansions provide a practical route to ground-state observables on this lattice.
  • The hyperhoneycomb geometry with SU(4) symmetry supports a quantum spin liquid without magnetic order.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same numerical approach could be tested on other three-dimensional frustrated lattices with higher symmetry.
  • Candidate materials with effective SU(4) interactions might be examined for gapless excitations.
  • Alternative tensor-network ansatze or larger-scale simulations could provide independent checks on the gap.

Load-bearing premise

The loop expansions converge quickly enough and the finite-bond-dimension data can be reliably extrapolated to infinite bond dimension to determine the presence or absence of a gap.

What would settle it

A calculation at significantly larger bond dimensions that extrapolates to a finite nonzero gap would contradict the gapless conclusion.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27493 by A. G. Sotnikov, I. V. Lukin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: and consists of four different sites and six different bonds, while all sites in this lattice are trivalent. The minimal loop in the system consists of 10 different sites. Note that bonds pointing vertically (in z direction) are not geometrically equivalent to other bonds. The model was already studied in Ref. [13] with varia￾tional Monte Carlo approach in relation with spin-orbital models and was predicte… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The loop expansion on the hyperhoneycomb lattice. (a) We form the double layer tensors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Magnetic phase with 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Dependence of the average energy per bond on the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Extrapolation of the magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Dependence of the energy anisotropy ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Energy [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Magnetization [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Comparison of the density matrices in terms of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study the ground state of the SU(4) Heisenberg model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice using three-dimensional projected entangled pair states. We show that it is possible to compute physical observables for the ground states using loop expansions, which converge quickly on tree-like lattices. Our extrapolations to the limit of infinite bond dimensions point toward gapless spin-liquid ground state.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the SU(4) Heisenberg model on the hyperhoneycomb lattice with three-dimensional projected entangled pair states (PEPS). It employs loop expansions to compute observables, asserts rapid convergence, and extrapolates to infinite bond dimension to conclude that the ground state is a gapless spin liquid.

Significance. A reliable demonstration of a gapless spin liquid in this three-dimensional frustrated model would be of substantial interest to the field of quantum magnetism, as such phases remain rare in 3D and the technical approach of loop-expanded 3D PEPS could extend to other lattices if the convergence properties hold.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript states that loop expansions 'converge quickly on tree-like lattices,' yet applies the method to the hyperhoneycomb lattice, which contains plaquettes and closed loops. No section demonstrates that truncation errors remain controlled on this geometry or that the finite-D data used for the gapless diagnosis are free of systematic bias from the loop series; this directly affects the reliability of the D o∞ extrapolation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed reading and the constructive comment on the abstract and convergence properties. We address the concern below and will make revisions to improve clarity and strengthen the supporting analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The manuscript states that loop expansions 'converge quickly on tree-like lattices,' yet applies the method to the hyperhoneycomb lattice, which contains plaquettes and closed loops. No section demonstrates that truncation errors remain controlled on this geometry or that the finite-D data used for the gapless diagnosis are free of systematic bias from the loop series; this directly affects the reliability of the D→∞ extrapolation.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract phrasing is imprecise: the hyperhoneycomb lattice is not tree-like and contains plaquettes. We will revise the abstract to remove this wording and describe the loop expansion more generally. On the control of truncation errors, the manuscript already shows that observables stabilize with increasing loop order and that different truncation schemes yield consistent trends, but we acknowledge that a dedicated discussion or appendix explicitly quantifying the residual truncation bias on this lattice (e.g., by comparing successive loop orders for the same finite-D tensors) is absent. We will add such an analysis in the revised manuscript to demonstrate that the systematic error from the loop series is smaller than the statistical uncertainty used in the D→∞ extrapolation, thereby supporting the gapless diagnosis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct numerical PEPS computation with extrapolation

full rationale

The paper reports a numerical study of the SU(4) Heisenberg model via 3D PEPS and loop expansions, followed by extrapolation of observables to infinite bond dimension. No equations, parameters, or self-citations reduce any claimed result to its own inputs by construction. The loop-expansion convergence statement is an assumption about the method's applicability rather than a self-referential definition or fitted prediction. The central claim therefore rests on independent computational output rather than tautological reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5580 in / 975 out tokens · 34406 ms · 2026-06-29T01:00:35.315853+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    magnetic

    While we can obtain results at smallerD, these have a much less pronounced structure of the phases. This is largely due to incomplete bond spectra multiplets for smaller bond dimensions. The optimizations for these small unit cells converge to three different phases. The optimization for 2×2×1 unit cells mostly converges to the “magnetic” phase with four ...

    2023

  2. [2]

    A. V. Gorshkov, M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, C. Xu, P. S. Julienne, J. Ye, P. Zoller, E. Demler, M. D. Lukin, and A. M. Rey, Two-orbital SU(N) magnetism with ultracold alkaline-earth atoms, Nat. Phys.6, 289 (2010)

    2010

  3. [3]

    M. A. Cazalilla, A. F. Ho, and M. Ueda, Ultracold gases of ytterbium: ferromagnetism and Mott states in an SU(6) Fermi system, New J. Phys.11, 103033 (2009)

    2009

  4. [4]

    M. A. Cazalilla and A. M. Rey, Ultracold Fermi gases with emergent SU(N) symmetry, Rep. Progr. Phys.77, 124401 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Hermele, V

    M. Hermele, V. Gurarie, and A. M. Rey, Mott insulators of ultracold fermionic alkaline earth atoms: undercon- strained magnetism and chiral spin liquid, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 135301 (2009)

    2009

  6. [6]

    S. Taie, R. Yamazaki, S. Sugawa, and Y. Takahashi, An SU(6) Mott insulator of an atomic Fermi gas realized by large-spin Pomeranchuk cooling, Nat. Phys.8, 825 (2012)

    2012

  7. [7]

    Scazza, C

    F. Scazza, C. Hofrichter, M. H¨ ofer, P. C. De Groot, I. Bloch, and S. F¨ olling, Observation of two-orbital spin- exchange interactions with ultracold SU(N)-symmetric fermions, Nat. Phys.10, 779 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Zhang, M

    X. Zhang, M. Bishof, S. L. Bromley, C. V. Kraus, M. S. Safronova, P. Zoller, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Spectroscopic observation of SU(N)-symmetric interactions in Sr orbital magnetism, Science345, 1467 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Pagano, M

    G. Pagano, M. Mancini, G. Cappellini, P. Lombardi, F. Sch¨ afer, H. Hu, X.-J. Liu, J. Catani, C. Sias, M. Ingus- cio, and L. Fallani, A one-dimensional liquid of fermions with tunable spin, Nat. Phys.10, 198 (2014)

    2014

  10. [10]

    K. I. Kugel and D. I. Khomskii, The Jahn-Teller ef- fect and magnetism: transition metal compounds, Soviet Physics Uspekhi25, 231 (1982)

    1982

  11. [11]

    A. M. Ole´ s, Spin-orbital physics in transition metal ox- ides, Acta Physica Polonica A115, 36 (2009)

    2009

  12. [12]

    G. Chen, R. Pereira, and L. Balents, Exotic phases in- duced by strong spin-orbit coupling in ordered double perovskites, Phys. Rev. B82, 174440 (2010)

    2010

  13. [13]

    Romh´ anyi, L

    J. Romh´ anyi, L. Balents, and G. Jackeli, Spin-orbit dimers and noncollinear phases ind 1 cubic double per- ovskites, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 217202 (2017)

    2017

  14. [14]

    W. M. H. Natori, E. C. Andrade, and R. G. Pereira, SU(4)-symmetric spin-orbital liquids on the hyperhoney- comb lattice, Phys. Rev. B98, 195113 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    M. G. Yamada, M. Oshikawa, and G. Jackeli, Emergent SU(4) symmetry inα-ZrCl 3 and crystalline spin-orbital liquids, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 097201 (2018)

    2018

  16. [16]

    Wu, Mott made easy, Nat

    C. Wu, Mott made easy, Nat. Phys.9, 73 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    J. I. Cirac, D. P´ erez-Garc´ ıa, N. Schuch, and F. Ver- straete, Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states: Concepts, symmetries, theorems, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 045003 (2021), arXiv:2011.12127

    arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor net- works: Matrix product states and projected entan- gled pair states, Annals of Physics349, 117 (2014), arXiv:1306.2164

    R. Or´ us, A practical introduction to tensor net- works: Matrix product states and projected entan- gled pair states, Annals of Physics349, 117 (2014), arXiv:1306.2164

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Or´ us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nature Reviews Physics1, 538 (2019), arXiv:1812.04011

    R. Or´ us, Tensor networks for complex quantum systems, Nature Reviews Physics1, 538 (2019), arXiv:1812.04011

    arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    M. C. Ba˜ nuls, Tensor network algorithms: A route map, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 173 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), arXiv:1008.3477

    U. Schollw¨ ock, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Annals of Physics 326, 96 (2011), arXiv:1008.3477. 11

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  22. [22]

    Corboz, K

    P. Corboz, K. Penc, F. Mila, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Sim- plex solids in SU(N) heisenberg models on the kagome and checkerboard lattices, Physical Review B86, 041106 (2012), arXiv:1204.6682

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  23. [23]

    Corboz, M

    P. Corboz, M. Lajk´ o, K. Penc, F. Mila, and A. M. L¨ auchli, Competing states in the SU(3) heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice: Plaquette valence-bond crys- tal versus dimerized color-ordered state, Physical Review B87, 195113 (2013), arXiv:1302.1108

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  24. [24]

    Corboz, M

    P. Corboz, M. Lajk´ o, A. M. L¨ auchli, K. Penc, and F. Mila, Spin-orbital quantum liquid on the honey- comb lattice, Physical Review X2, 041013 (2012), arXiv:1207.6029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Nataf, M

    P. Nataf, M. Lajk´ o, P. Corboz, A. M. L¨ auchli, K. Penc, and F. Mila, SU(6) heisenberg model on the honeycomb lattice: Competition between plaquette and chiral order, Physical Review B93, 201113 (2016), arXiv:1601.00959

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Bauer, P

    B. Bauer, P. Corboz, A. M. L¨ auchli, L. Messio, K. Penc, M. Troyer, and F. Mila, Three-sublattice order in the SU(3) heisenberg model on the square and trian- gular lattice, Physical Review B85, 125116 (2012), arXiv:1112.1100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    Y. Xu, S. Capponi, J.-Y. Chen, L. Vanderstraeten, J. Hasik, A. H. Nevidomskyy, M. Mambrini, K. Penc, and D. Poilblanc, Phase diagram of the chiral SU(3) an- tiferromagnet on the kagome lattice, Physical Review B 108, 195153 (2023), arXiv:2306.16192

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Corboz, A

    P. Corboz, A. M. L¨ auchli, K. Penc, M. Troyer, and F. Mila, Simultaneous dimerization and SU(4) symmetry breaking of 4-color fermions on the square lattice, Physi- cal Review Letters107, 215301 (2011), arXiv:1108.2857

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  29. [29]

    Lee and N

    H.-Y. Lee and N. Kawashima, Spin-one bilinear- biquadratic model on a star lattice, Physical Review B 97, 205123 (2018), arXiv:1802.10281

    arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    P. C. G. Vlaar and P. Corboz, Simulation of three- dimensional quantum systems with projected entangled- pair states, Physical Review B103, 205137 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    Lukin and A

    I. Lukin and A. Sotnikov, Single-layer tensor network ap- proach for three-dimensional quantum systems, Physical Review B110, 064422 (2024), arXiv:2405.01489

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Lukin and A

    I. Lukin and A. Sotnikov, Dimerization in the SU(4) heisenberg model on the cubic lattice: ipeps study, arXiv preprint (2025), arXiv:2510.00284

    arXiv 2025

  33. [33]

    J. Dziarmaga, Monte carlo sampling from a projected entangled-pair state in simulations of quantum anneal- ing in the three dimensional random ising model, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2603.16509

    arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    S. S. Jahromi and R. Or´ us, Universal tensor-network al- gorithm for any infinite lattice, Physical Review B99, 195105 (2019), arXiv:1808.00680

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    S. S. Jahromi, R. Or´ us, D. Poilblanc, and F. Mila, Spin-1/2 kagome heisenberg antiferromagnet with strong breathing anisotropy, SciPost Physics9, 092 (2020), arXiv:1912.10756

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    S. S. Jahromi and R. Or´ us, Thermal bosons in 3d optical lattices via tensor networks, Scientific Reports10, 19051 (2020), arXiv:2005.00314

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    S. S. Jahromi, H. Yarloo, and R. Or´ us, Thermodynamics of three-dimensional kitaev quantum spin liquids via ten- sor networks, Physical Review Research3, 033205 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Tindall and M

    J. Tindall and M. T. Fishman, Gauging tensor networks with belief propagation, SciPost Physics15, 222 (2023), arXiv:2306.17837

    arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Tindall, M

    J. Tindall, M. Fishman, E. M. Stoudenmire, and D. Sels, Efficient tensor network simulation of IBM’s eagle kicked ising experiment, PRX Quantum5, 010308 (2024), arXiv:2306.14887

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Dynamics of disordered quantum systems with two- and three-dimensional tensor networks

    J. Tindall, A. F. Mello, M. Fishman, E. M. Stoudenmire, and D. Sels, Dynamics of disordered quantum systems with two- and three-dimensional tensor networks, Science 10.1126/science.adx2728 (2026), arXiv:2503.05693

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1126/science.adx2728 2026

  41. [41]

    Evenbly, N

    G. Evenbly, N. Pancotti, A. Milsted, J. Gray, and G. K.-L. Chan, Loop series expansions for tensor net- works, Physical Review Research8, 013245 (2026), arXiv:2409.03108

    arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Chertkov and V

    M. Chertkov and V. Y. Chernyak, Loop calculus in sta- tistical physics and information science, Physical Review E73, 065102 (2006), arXiv:cond-mat/0601487

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  43. [43]

    Chertkov and V

    M. Chertkov and V. Y. Chernyak, Loop series for dis- crete statistical models on graphs, Journal of Statisti- cal Mechanics: Theory and Experiment , P06009 (2006), arXiv:cond-mat/0603189

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  44. [44]

    G. Park, J. Gray, and G. K.-L. Chan, Simulating quan- tum dynamics in two-dimensional lattices with tensor network influence functional belief propagation (2025), arXiv:2504.07344

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Midha and Y

    S. Midha and Y. F. Zhang, Beyond belief propagation: Cluster-corrected tensor network contraction with expo- nential convergence (2025), arXiv:2510.02290

    arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Midha, G

    S. Midha, G. M. Sommers, J. Tindall, and D. A. Abanin, Belief propagation and tensor network expansions for many-body quantum systems: Rigorous results and fun- damental limits (2026), arXiv:2604.03228

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    J. Gray, G. Park, G. Evenbly, N. Pancotti, E. F. Kjønstad, and G. K.-L. Chan, Tensor network loop clus- ter expansions for quantum many-body problems (2025), arXiv:2510.05647

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  48. [48]

    Tindall, G

    J. Tindall, G. M. Sommers, and H. Kappen, Contract- ing tensor networks with generalized belief propagation (2026), arXiv:2604.24760

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  49. [49]

    A. F. Mello, E. M. Stoudenmire, and J. Tindall, Finite- temperature formation of magnetic plateaus and sim- plex liquid states on the frustrated ruby lattice (2026), arXiv:2606.07609

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  50. [50]

    Bruognolo, J.-W

    B. Bruognolo, J.-W. Li, J. von Delft, and A. Weich- selbaum, A beginner’s guide to non-Abelian iPEPS for correlated fermions, SciPost Physics Lecture Notes , 25 (2021), arXiv:2006.08289

    arXiv 2021

  51. [51]

    Jiang, Z.-Y

    H.-C. Jiang, Z.-Y. Weng, and T. Xiang, Accurate de- termination of tensor network state of quantum lattice models in two dimensions, Physical Review Letters101, 090603 (2008), arXiv:0806.3719

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  52. [52]

    Jordan, R

    J. Jordan, R. Or´ us, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and J. I. Cirac, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lat- tice systems in two spatial dimensions, Physical Review Letters101, 250602 (2008), arXiv:cond-mat/0703788

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  53. [53]

    H. N. Phien, J. A. Bengua, H. D. Tuan, P. Corboz, and R. Or´ us, Infinite projected entangled pair states algo- rithm improved: Fast full update and gauge fixing, Phys- ical Review B92, 035142 (2015), arXiv:1503.05345

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Corboz, Variational optimization with infinite pro- jected entangled-pair states, Physical Review B94, 035133 (2016), arXiv:1605.03006

    P. Corboz, Variational optimization with infinite pro- jected entangled-pair states, Physical Review B94, 035133 (2016), arXiv:1605.03006

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  55. [55]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, P. Corboz, and F. Ver- straete, Gradient methods for variational optimization of projected entangled-pair states, Physical Review B94, 155123 (2016), arXiv:1606.09170. 12

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  56. [56]

    I. V. Lukin and A. G. Sotnikov, Variational optimiza- tion of tensor-network states with the honeycomb-lattice corner transfer matrix, Physical Review B107, 054424 (2023), arXiv:2209.03428

    arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Yang and P

    Q. Yang and P. Corboz, Efficient iPEPS simulation on the honeycomb lattice via QR-based CTMRG, Physical Review B113, 085109 (2026), arXiv:2509.05090

    arXiv 2026

  58. [58]

    H. J. Liao, Z. Y. Xie, J. Chen, Z. Y. Liu, H. D. Xie, R. Z. Huang, B. Normand, and T. Xiang, Gapless spin- liquid ground state in thes= 1/2 kagome antiferro- magnet, Physical Review Letters118, 137202 (2017), arXiv:1610.04727

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  59. [59]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, The ITensor software library for tensor network calculations, SciPost Physics Codebases , 4 (2022), arXiv:2007.14822

    arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Fishman, S

    M. Fishman, S. R. White, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Code- base release 0.3 for ITensor, SciPost Physics Codebases , 4 (2022)

    2022

  61. [61]

    Gray, quimb: A python package for quantum informa- tion and many-body calculations, Journal of Open Source Software3, 819 (2018)

    J. Gray, quimb: A python package for quantum informa- tion and many-body calculations, Journal of Open Source Software3, 819 (2018)

    2018

  62. [62]

    Corboz, P

    P. Corboz, P. Czarnik, G. Kapteijns, and L. Taglia- cozzo, Finite correlation length scaling with infinite pro- jected entangled-pair states, Physical Review X8, 031031 (2018), arXiv:1706.07056

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Rader and A

    M. Rader and A. M. L¨ auchli, Finite correlation length scaling in Lorentz-invariant gapless iPEPS wave functions, Physical Review X8, 031030 (2018), arXiv:1803.08566

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Hasik and P

    J. Hasik and P. Corboz, Incommensurate order with translationally invariant projected entangled-pair states: Spiral states and quantum spin liquid on the anisotropic triangular lattice, Physical Review Letters133, 176502 (2024), arXiv:2311.05534

    arXiv 2024

  65. [65]

    Ueda and I

    H. Ueda and I. Maruyama, Incommensurate matrix prod- uct state for quantum spin systems, Physical Review B 86, 064438 (2012), arXiv:1112.2075

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  66. [66]

    E. K.-H. Lee, R. Schaffer, S. Bhattacharjee, and Y. B. Kim, Heisenberg-Kitaev model on the hyperhoney- comb lattice, Physical Review B89, 045117 (2014), arXiv:1308.6592

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  67. [67]

    Takayama, A

    T. Takayama, A. Kato, R. Dinnebier, J. Nuss, H. Kono, L. S. I. Veiga, G. Fabbris, D. Haskel, and H. Takagi, Hy- perhoneycomb iridateβ-Li 2IrO3 as a platform for Kitaev magnetism, Physical Review Letters114, 077202 (2015), arXiv:1403.3296

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  68. [68]

    Okamoto, M

    Y. Okamoto, M. Nohara, H. Aruga-Katori, and H. Tak- agi, Spin-liquid state in the S=1/2 hyperkagome antifer- romagnet Na4Ir3O8, Physical Review Letters99, 137207 (2007), arXiv:0705.2821

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  69. [69]

    E. J. Bergholtz, A. M. L¨ auchli, and R. Moessner, Sym- metry breaking on the three-dimensional hyperkagome lattice of Na4Ir3O8, Physical Review Letters105, 237202 (2010), arXiv:1010.1345

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Z. Xie, J. Chen, J. Yu, X. Kong, B. Normand, and T. Xi- ang, Tensor renormalization of quantum many-body sys- tems using projected entangled simplex states, Physical Review X4, 011025 (2014), arXiv:1307.5696

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  71. [71]

    Gendiar, R

    A. Gendiar, R. Krcmar, S. Andergassen, M. Daniˇ ska, and T. Nishino, Weak correlation effects in the Ising model on triangular-tiled hyperbolic lattices, Physical Review E86, 021105 (2012), arXiv:1205.3850

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  72. [72]

    Daniˇ ska and A

    M. Daniˇ ska and A. Gendiar, Analysis of quantum spin models on hyperbolic lattices and Bethe lattice, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical49, 145003 (2016), arXiv:1510.01450

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016