pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28115 · v1 · pith:7TESLSNFnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

A Unified Model for the Emission of Supernova-Associated Fast X-ray Transients: Case Studies of EP240414a, EP250108a, and GRB~171205A

Yu-Fei Li , Da-Bin Lin , Jia Ren , Zhi-Lin Chen , En-Wei Liang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords fast X-ray transientssupernovaemagnetarpulsar wind nebulacocoon emissiongamma-ray burstsX-ray afterglowsType Ic supernovae
0
0 comments X

The pith

A magnetar jet and wind explain the phased emissions seen in supernova-associated fast X-ray transients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that fast X-ray transients associated with broad-lined Type Ic supernovae share a common origin with some low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts. A rapidly spinning magnetar acts as the central engine, launching both a collimated jet and an isotropic wind. The jet creates a hot cocoon whose thermal emission is seen early on. The wind interacts with ejecta to form a pulsar wind nebula responsible for mid-term non-thermal emission. Later emissions come from the supernova powered by nickel decay and the magnetar, while X-ray afterglows trace the structured jet. This framework accounts for the observed thermal-to-nonthermal spectral evolution in these events.

Core claim

In this model, a rapidly spinning magnetar generates a collimated Poynting flux-dominated jet and an isotropic wind. The jet propagates through the stellar envelope generating a hot cocoon. A pulsar wind nebula forms from the interaction of the wind and the ejecta. As the cocoon becomes transparent, PWN emission escapes. This explains early thermal emission from the cocoon, mid-term non-thermal from the PWN, late-term from SNe and magnetar, and X-ray afterglows from the structured jet.

What carries the argument

The rapidly spinning magnetar that produces both a collimated Poynting-flux jet and an isotropic wind, leading to cocoon and pulsar wind nebula formation.

Load-bearing premise

The central engine is a rapidly spinning magnetar that simultaneously produces a collimated Poynting-flux jet and an isotropic wind whose interaction with the ejecta forms a PWN.

What would settle it

An observation of an FXT associated with a supernova showing no magnetar-like spin-down signatures or mismatched emission component timings would falsify the unification.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28115 by Da-Bin Lin, En-Wei Liang, Jia Ren, Yu-Fei Li, Zhi-Lin Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Bottom-panel: Comparative analysis of multi-band light-curves of EP240414a/SN 2024gsa (solid circles; inverted triangles denote upper limits), EP250108a/SN 2025kg (hollow circles), GRB 171205A/SN 2017iuk (hollow diamonds), and EP241021a (hollow pentagrams; solid pentagrams denote upper limits). Upper-panel: a schematic diagram of our model with the blue, red, and green lines for the cocoon emission (domina… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Multi-band observations of EP240414a’s counterparts and the theoretical interpretation. Observed fluxes in r-band, i-band, z-band, X-ray, 3GHz, 5.5GHz, and 9GHz are shown (blue, green, orange, black, red, magenta, and cyan, respectively; circles for detections) in the observer-frame time (for z = 0.401). Estimated total flux contributions (solid lines) along with individual components are shown: the afterg… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Multi-band observations of EP250108a’s counterparts and the theoretical interpretation. Observed fluxes in iMeph￾band, i-band, r-band, gMeph-band, g-band, and uMeph-band are shown (pink, magenta, red, green, olive, and blue, respectively; circles for detections) in the observer-frame time (for z = 0.176). Estimated total flux contributions (solid lines) along with individual components are shown: the cocoo… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Multi-band observations of GRB 171205A’s counterparts and the theoretical interpretation. Observed fluxes in X-ray, b-band, g-band, r-band, i-band, z-band, J-band, and H-band, are shown (black, pink, purple, blue, green, orange, red, and cyan, respectively; circles for detections) in the observer-frame time (for z = 0.0368). Estimated total flux contributions (solid lines) along with individual components … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: From top to bottom, evolutions of the black-body temperature (red line) and radius (blue line) for GRB 171205A in our model (calculated based on Equation A4 and A9). These data are taken from Extended Data [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Corner plot of the MCMC posterior sample density distributions of EP240414a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Corner plot of the MCMC posterior sample density distributions of EP250108a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Einstein Probe (EP) has detected several Fast X-ray Transients (FXTs) associated with broad-lined Type Ic supernovae (SNe), including EP240414a and EP250108a. The observations reveal common features among these FXTs, but the corresponding physical origin remains debated. By comparing the FXTs with low-luminosity gamma-ray bursts (e.g., GRB 171205A), we propose a unified model that explains the common features in these events. In this model, a rapidly spinning magnetar generates a collimated Poynting flux-dominated jet and an isotropic wind. As the jet propagates through the stellar envelope, it generates a hot cocoon. In addition, a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) is formed during the interaction of the wind and the ejecta. As the surrounding cocoon gradually becomes transparent, the emission from the PWN escapes and is observed. This model provides a unified explanation for the observations: (1) Early thermal emission originates from the cocoon; (2) Mid-term non-thermal emission comes from the PWN; (3) Late-term emission originates from SNe driven by $^{56}$Ni radioactive decay and magnetar. (4) The X-ray afterglows originate from the structured jet. Our research thus provides a natural explanation for the observed thermal-to-nonthermal evolution in such FXTs and reveals their shared physical origin with some GRB-SNe.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a unified physical model for supernova-associated fast X-ray transients (FXTs) including EP240414a, EP250108a, and GRB 171205A. A rapidly spinning magnetar is posited to launch both a collimated Poynting-flux jet (producing a hot cocoon and structured-jet afterglow) and an isotropic wind that forms a pulsar wind nebula (PWN) via interaction with the ejecta. The model partitions the observed emission by epoch: early thermal from the cocoon, mid-term non-thermal from the PWN once the cocoon becomes transparent, late-term from 56Ni decay plus magnetar-powered SN, thereby explaining the thermal-to-nonthermal evolution and linking these events to low-luminosity GRB-SNe.

Significance. If the timing predictions can be shown to follow from a single set of ejecta and engine parameters, the model would offer a coherent framework connecting FXTs, low-luminosity GRBs, and engine-driven SNe. The manuscript currently supplies no quantitative light-curve or spectral fits, error bars, or direct comparison of model predictions to the cited events, so the significance cannot yet be assessed.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / Model Description] Abstract and model description: the central claim requires that PWN non-thermal emission becomes observable precisely when cocoon optical depth falls below ~1. No explicit optical-depth or radiative-transfer calculation is reported that derives cocoon mass, velocity, and density profile from the same ejecta parameters used for the SN light-curve fit, combined with frequency-dependent opacity, to predict the transparency epoch for each of the three events. Without this step the component assignment remains a post-hoc partitioning.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We agree that the central claim of the model requires a quantitative demonstration that the PWN emission becomes visible at the epoch when the cocoon optical depth drops below unity, derived self-consistently from the same ejecta parameters. We will revise the manuscript to address this.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Model Description] Abstract and model description: the central claim requires that PWN non-thermal emission becomes observable precisely when cocoon optical depth falls below ~1. No explicit optical-depth or radiative-transfer calculation is reported that derives cocoon mass, velocity, and density profile from the same ejecta parameters used for the SN light-curve fit, combined with frequency-dependent opacity, to predict the transparency epoch for each of the three events. Without this step the component assignment remains a post-hoc partitioning.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the present manuscript does not contain the requested explicit optical-depth or radiative-transfer calculation. The model description is currently conceptual, with component assignments motivated by the observed thermal-to-nonthermal transition but not yet derived from a single set of ejecta parameters. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated section that (i) adopts the cocoon mass, velocity, and density profile already used for the SN light-curve modeling, (ii) computes the frequency-dependent optical depth as a function of time for each of the three events, and (iii) demonstrates that the predicted transparency epoch coincides with the observed onset of the non-thermal PWN component. This will replace the current post-hoc partitioning with a quantitative prediction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in model construction

full rationale

The paper proposes a phenomenological unified model that assigns specific physical components (cocoon for early thermal, PWN for mid-term non-thermal, 56Ni/magnetar for late, structured jet for afterglow) to observed emission phases in the three events. This assignment follows directly from the model's definition rather than from any derived prediction that reduces to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. No equations, parameter-fitting procedures, or load-bearing self-citations are exhibited in the provided text that would make the claimed explanations equivalent to the inputs. The framework is self-contained as a modeling choice and does not invoke uniqueness theorems or ansatzes from prior author work to force the result.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit list of fitted parameters, background axioms, or newly invented entities; standard astrophysical concepts (magnetar, cocoon, PWN) are invoked without stated values or derivations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5828 in / 1234 out tokens · 40302 ms · 2026-06-29T02:39:00.635539+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

87 extracted references · 85 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    2025, ApJ, 978, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad93b4

    Ai, S., Gao, H., & Zhang, B. 2025, ApJ, 978, 52, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad93b4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad93b4 2025

  2. [2]

    2022, MNRAS, 516, 2614, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2380

    Ai, S., Zhang, B., & Zhu, Z. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 2614, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2380

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2380 2022

  3. [3]

    Arnett, W. D. 1982, ApJ, 253, 785, doi: 10.1086/159681

    work page doi:10.1086/159681 1982

  4. [4]

    R., Pooley, G., et al

    Berger, E., Kulkarni, S. R., Pooley, G., et al. 2003, Nature, 426, 154, doi: 10.1038/nature01998

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01998 2003

  5. [5]

    S., Carotenuto, F., Fender, R., et al

    Bright, J. S., Carotenuto, F., Fender, R., et al. 2025, ApJ, 981, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adaaef

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adaaef 2025

  6. [6]

    2011a, ApJL, 739, L55, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L55

    Bromberg, O., Nakar, E., & Piran, T. 2011a, ApJL, 739, L55, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/L55

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/739/2/l55 2041

  7. [7]

    2011b, ApJ, 740, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/100

    Bromberg, O., Nakar, E., Piran, T., & Sari, R. 2011b, ApJ, 740, 100, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/740/2/100

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/740/2/100

  8. [8]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 1739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2591

    Bromberg, O., & Tchekhovskoy, A. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 1739, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2591

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2591 2016

  9. [9]

    A., Parley, N

    Quataert, E. 2012, MNRAS, 419, 1537, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19810.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19810.x 2012

  10. [10]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14588, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14588

    Busmann, M., O’Connor, B., Sommer, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2503.14588, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2503.14588

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14588 2025

  11. [11]

    SNIa light curves and radioactive decay

    Cappellaro, E., Mazzali, P. A., Benetti, S., et al. 1997, A&A, 328, 203, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9707016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.astro-ph/9707016 1997

  12. [12]

    C., & Vinko, J

    Chatzopoulos, E., Wheeler, J. C., & Vinko, J. 2009, ApJ, 704, 1251, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/704/2/1251 —. 2012, ApJ, 746, 121, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/746/2/121

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/704/2/1251 2009

  13. [13]

    A., & McKee, C

    Colgate, S. A., & McKee, C. 1969, ApJ, 157, 623, doi: 10.1086/150102

    work page doi:10.1086/150102 1969

  14. [14]

    A., Petschek, A

    Colgate, S. A., Petschek, A. G., & Kriese, J. T. 1980, ApJL, 237, L81, doi: 10.1086/183239

    work page doi:10.1086/183239 1980

  15. [15]

    G., & Gou, L

    Dai, Z. G., & Gou, L. J. 2001, ApJ, 552, 72, doi: 10.1086/320463 De Colle, F., Kumar, P., & Hoeflich, P. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 3627, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac742

    work page doi:10.1086/320463 2001

  16. [16]

    R., Soderberg, A

    Drout, M. R., Soderberg, A. M., Mazzali, P. A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 774, 58, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/774/1/58

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/774/1/58 2013

  17. [17]

    C., Quataert, E., & MacFadyen, A

    Duffell, P. C., Quataert, E., & MacFadyen, A. I. 2015, ApJ, 813, 64, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/64

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/813/1/64 2015

  18. [18]

    Eyles-Ferris, R. A. J., Jonker, P. G., Levan, A. J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08886, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08886

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08886 2025

  19. [19]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.11503, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.11503

    Finneran, G., Cotter, L., & Martin-Carrillo, A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.11503, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.11503

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.11503 2024

  20. [20]

    2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.002

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Conley, A., Meierjurgen Farr, W., et al. 2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1303.002. http://ascl.net/1303.002

    2013

  21. [21]

    J., Vreeswijk, P

    Galama, T. J., Vreeswijk, P. M., van Paradijs, J., et al. 1998, Nature, 395, 670, doi: 10.1038/27150

    work page doi:10.1038/27150 1998

  22. [22]

    D., Slane, P

    Gelfand, J. D., Slane, P. O., & Temim, T. 2015, ApJ, 807, 30, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/1/30

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/807/1/30 2015

  23. [23]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.05444, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05444

    Gianfagna, G., Piro, L., Bruni, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.05444, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.05444

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.05444 2025

  24. [24]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 1640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2699

    Gottlieb, O., & Nakar, E. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 1640, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2699

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2699 2022

  25. [25]

    2021, MNRAS, 500, 3511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3501

    Gottlieb, O., Nakar, E., & Bromberg, O. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 3511, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3501

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3501 2021

  26. [26]

    2018a, MNRAS, 473, 576, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2357

    Gottlieb, O., Nakar, E., & Piran, T. 2018a, MNRAS, 473, 576, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2357

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx2357

  27. [27]

    2018b, MNRAS, 479, 588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1462

    Gottlieb, O., Nakar, E., Piran, T., & Hotokezaka, K. 2018b, MNRAS, 479, 588, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1462

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1462

  28. [28]

    2021, MNRAS, 500, 627, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3276

    Hamidani, H., & Ioka, K. 2021, MNRAS, 500, 627, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3276

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3276 2021

  29. [29]

    2025, ApJL, 986, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add99d

    Hamidani, H., Sato, Y., Kashiyama, K., et al. 2025, ApJL, 986, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/add99d

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/add99d 2025

  30. [30]

    M., Zhang, E., et al

    Hattori, S., Straal, S. M., Zhang, E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abba32

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abba32 2020

  31. [31]

    2003, Nature, 423, 847, doi: 10.1038/nature01750

    Hjorth, J., Sollerman, J., Møller, P., et al. 2003, Nature, 423, 847, doi: 10.1038/nature01750

    work page doi:10.1038/nature01750 2003

  32. [32]

    Spin Precession Along Circular Orbits in Stationary Axially Symmet- ric Spacetimes

    Huang, Y. F., Dai, Z. G., & Lu, T. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 513, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02887.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02887.x 1999

  33. [33]

    F., Wu, X

    Huang, Y. F., Wu, X. F., Dai, Z. G., Ma, H. T., & Lu, T. 2004, ApJ, 605, 300, doi: 10.1086/382202

    work page doi:10.1086/382202 2004

  34. [34]

    2019, Nature, 565, 324, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0826-3

    Izzo, L., de Ugarte Postigo, A., Maeda, K., et al. 2019, Nature, 565, 324, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0826-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0826-3 2019

  35. [35]

    2010, ApJ, 717, 245, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/245

    Kasen, D., & Bildsten, L. 2010, ApJ, 717, 245, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/717/1/245

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/717/1/245 2010

  36. [36]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, L121, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx175

    Kathirgamaraju, A., Barniol Duran, R., & Giannios, D. 2018, MNRAS, 473, L121, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slx175

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx175 2018

  37. [37]

    S., & Olinto, A

    Kotera, K., Phinney, E. S., & Olinto, A. V. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 3228, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt680

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt680 2013

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    Kouveliotou, C., Meegan, C. A., Fishman, G. J., et al. 1993, ApJL, 413, L101, doi: 10.1086/186969

    work page doi:10.1086/186969 1993

  39. [39]

    B., Gupta, R., et al

    Kumar, A., Pandey, S. B., Gupta, R., et al. 2022, NewA, 97, 101889, doi: 10.1016/j.newast.2022.101889

    work page doi:10.1016/j.newast.2022.101889 2022

  40. [40]

    Lazzati, D., & Begelman, M. C. 2005, ApJ, 629, 903, doi: 10.1086/430877

    work page doi:10.1086/430877 2005

  41. [41]

    X., Zhu, Z

    Li, W. X., Zhu, Z. P., Zou, X. Z., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17034, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.17034

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.17034 2025

  42. [42]

    2024a, ApJ, 960, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bc

    Li, Y.-F., Lin, D.-B., Ren, J., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 960, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bc

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad08bc

  43. [43]

    2024b, ApJ, 976, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad81f4

    Li, Y.-F., Lin, D.-B., Zhou, L., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 976, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad81f4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad81f4

  44. [44]

    2022, ApJ, 931, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69db 21

    Lian, J.-S., Wang, S.-Q., Gan, W.-P., Li, J.-Y., & Liang, E.-W. 2022, ApJ, 931, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac69db 21

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac69db 2022

  45. [45]

    I., & Woosley, S

    MacFadyen, A. I., & Woosley, S. E. 1999, ApJ, 524, 262, doi: 10.1086/307790

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/307790 1999

  46. [46]

    A., Deng, J., et al

    Maeda, K., Mazzali, P. A., Deng, J., et al. 2003, ApJ, 593, 931, doi: 10.1086/376591

    work page doi:10.1086/376591 2003

  47. [47]

    D., Thompson, T

    Margalit, B., Metzger, B. D., Thompson, T. A., Nicholl, M., & Sukhbold, T. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 2659, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty013

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty013 2018

  48. [48]

    2018, ApJ, 861, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac4a8

    Matsumoto, T., Ioka, K., Kisaka, S., & Nakar, E. 2018, ApJ, 861, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac4a8

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac4a8 2018

  49. [49]

    Matzner, C. D. 2003, MNRAS, 345, 575, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06969.x M´ esz´ aros, P., & Rees, M. J. 1997, ApJ, 476, 232, doi: 10.1086/303625

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06969.x 2003

  50. [50]

    2015, ApJ, 805, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/82

    Murase, K., Kashiyama, K., Kiuchi, K., & Bartos, I. 2015, ApJ, 805, 82, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/82

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/82 2015

  51. [51]

    2016, MNRAS, 461, 1498, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1328

    Murase, K., Kashiyama, K., & M´ esz´ aros, P. 2016, MNRAS, 461, 1498, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1328

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1328 2016

  52. [52]

    2014, ApJL, 784, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L28

    Nagakura, H., Hotokezaka, K., Sekiguchi, Y., Shibata, M., & Ioka, K. 2014, ApJL, 784, L28, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/L28

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/784/2/l28 2014

  53. [53]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/28

    Nakar, E., & Piran, T. 2017, ApJ, 834, 28, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/28

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/834/1/28 2017

  54. [54]

    2017, ApJ, 850, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9334

    Nicholl, M., Guillochon, J., & Berger, E. 2017, ApJ, 850, 55, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9334

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa9334 2017

  55. [55]

    L., & Kollmeier, J

    Piro, A. L., & Kollmeier, J. A. 2018, ApJ, 855, 103, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab3

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaaab3 2018

  56. [56]

    2017, MNRAS, 464, 3568, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1942

    Prajs, S., Sullivan, M., Smith, M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 3568, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1942

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1942 2017

  57. [57]

    2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 37852, 1

    Pugliese, G., Xu, D., Izzo, L., et al. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 37852, 1

    2024

  58. [58]

    C., Levan, A

    Rastinejad, J. C., Levan, A. J., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.08889, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.08889

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.08889 2025

  59. [59]

    2019, ApJ, 885, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4188 Roman Aguilar, L

    Ren, J., Lin, D.-B., Zhang, L.-L., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4188 Roman Aguilar, L. M., & Bersten, M. C. 2025, A&A, 702, L18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202556610

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab4188 2019

  60. [60]

    1998, ApJL, 497, L17, doi: 10.1086/311269

    Sari, R., Piran, T., & Narayan, R. 1998, ApJL, 497, L17, doi: 10.1086/311269

    work page doi:10.1086/311269 1998

  61. [61]

    A., White, S., et al

    Sheth, K., Frail, D. A., White, S., et al. 2003, ApJL, 595, L33, doi: 10.1086/378933

    work page doi:10.1086/378933 2003

  62. [62]

    2011, ApJ, 741, 39, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/39

    Sironi, L., & Spitkovsky, A. 2011, ApJ, 741, 39, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/1/39

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/741/1/39 2011

  63. [63]

    P., Hamidani, H., Schroeder, G., et al

    Srinivasaragavan, G. P., Hamidani, H., Schroeder, G., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2504.17516, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2504.17516

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.17516 2025

  64. [64]

    W., Gillanders, J

    Srivastav, S., Chen, T. W., Gillanders, J. H., et al. 2025, ApJL, 978, L21, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad9c75

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad9c75 2025

  65. [65]

    Z., Matheson, T., Garnavich, P

    Stanek, K. Z., Matheson, T., Garnavich, P. M., et al. 2003, ApJL, 591, L17, doi: 10.1086/376976

    work page doi:10.1086/376976 2003

  66. [66]

    2017, ApJ, 835, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/7

    Sun, H., Zhang, B., & Gao, H. 2017, ApJ, 835, 7, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/7

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/7 2017

  67. [67]

    X., Liu, L

    Sun, H., Li, W. X., Liu, L. D., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02571-1

    work page doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02571-1 2025

  68. [68]

    G., & Wheeler, J

    Sutherland, P. G., & Wheeler, J. C. 1984, ApJ, 280, 282, doi: 10.1086/161995

    work page doi:10.1086/161995 1984

  69. [69]

    J., & Takahara, F

    Tanaka, S. J., & Takahara, F. 2010, ApJ, 715, 1248, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/715/2/1248 —. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2945, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts528

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/715/2/1248 2010

  70. [70]

    A., Chang, P., & Quataert, E

    Thompson, T. A., Chang, P., & Quataert, E. 2004, ApJ, 611, 380, doi: 10.1086/421969

    work page doi:10.1086/421969 2004

  71. [71]

    F., Cillis, A., Mart´ ın, J., & de O˜ na Wilhelmi, E

    Torres, D. F., Cillis, A., Mart´ ın, J., & de O˜ na Wilhelmi, E. 2014, Journal of High Energy Astrophysics, 1, 31, doi: 10.1016/j.jheap.2014.02.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jheap.2014.02.001 2014

  72. [72]

    Usov, V. V. 1992, Nature, 357, 472, doi: 10.1038/357472a0 van Dalen, J. N. D., Levan, A. J., Jonker, P. G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 982, L47, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/adbc7e

    work page doi:10.1038/357472a0 1992

  73. [73]

    Q., Wang, L

    Wang, S. Q., Wang, L. J., Dai, Z. G., & Wu, X. F. 2015a, ApJ, 799, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/107 —. 2015b, ApJ, 807, 147, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/807/2/147

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/799/1/107

  74. [74]

    C., Yi, I., H¨ oflich, P., & Wang, L

    Wheeler, J. C., Yi, I., H¨ oflich, P., & Wang, L. 2000, ApJ, 537, 810, doi: 10.1086/309055

    work page doi:10.1086/309055 2000

  75. [75]

    Woosley, S. E. 2010, ApJL, 719, L204, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/L204

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/719/2/l204 2010

  76. [76]

    2022, Universe, 8, 633, doi: 10.3390/universe8120633

    Wu, G.-L., Yu, Y.-W., & Li, S.-Z. 2022, Universe, 8, 633, doi: 10.3390/universe8120633

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8120633 2022

  77. [77]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.12491, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.12491

    Wu, G.-L., Yu, Y.-W., Liu, L.-D., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.12491, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.12491

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12491 2025

  78. [78]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.07665, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.07665

    Xinwen, S., Lei, Y., Haonan, Y., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.07665, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.07665

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.07665 2025

  79. [79]

    Condon, J. J. 2000, AJ, 120, 2950, doi: 10.1086/316842

    work page doi:10.1086/316842 2000

  80. [80]

    2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.08781, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08781

    Yadav, M., Troja, E., Ricci, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2505.08781, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2505.08781

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.08781 2025

Showing first 80 references.