Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 minor 44 references

Tritronqu\'ee Painlev\'e II asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-07-12 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read At the edges of modulational instability, focusing NLS waves with nonzero backgrounds are corrected by a Painlevé-II tritronquée profile of size t^{-1/3}.

desk verdict Solid completion of the Biondini–Mantzavinos asymptotic map: the missing transition layer is a plane wave plus a genuine t^{-1/3} tritronquée correction, cleanly derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.29156 v2 pith:PIKUAQZP submitted 2026-06-28 nlin.SI

Haibing Zhang , Xianguo Geng , Kedong Wang This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.SI MSC 35Q5535Q1535B4037K40
keywords focusingnonlinearSchrödingerequationnonzeroboundaryconditionssteepestdescentinhomogeneousPainlevé-IItritronquéesolutionmodulationalinstabilitytransitionasymptotics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Earlier long-time analysis of the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions showed that the plane-wave and modulated-elliptic regions are separated by the rays x = ±4√2 q_o t, but left the thin transition layers near those rays unresolved. This paper fills that gap with a double-scaling steepest-descent analysis of the inverse-scattering Riemann–Hilbert problem. In each transition band of width O(t^{-2/3}) the leading term remains a plane wave, while the first correction is of order t^{-1/3} and is built from a distinguished tritronquée solution of an inhomogeneous Painlevé-II equation whose parameter is fixed by the reflection coefficient at the critical spectral point. The same special Painlevé function appears in the far-field asymptotics of rogue waves of infinite order, so the boundary layer of modulational instability is shown to be governed by a universal transcendental profile.

What carries the argument

A local Painlevé-II parametrix constructed from the Jimbo–Miwa Riemann–Hilbert problem for an inhomogeneous Painlevé-II equation; after double scaling near the coalescing stationary point k_c it supplies the matching data that produce the t^{-1/3} correction.

What would settle it

Numerically evolve a smooth, exponentially localized perturbation of a nonzero background whose reflection coefficient is nonzero at k_c and check whether, inside the predicted t^{-2/3} band, the difference between the solution and the plane wave scales as t^{-1/3} with a profile matching the stated tritronquée expression.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

In the double-scaling transition regions |x/t ± 4√2 q_o| ≤ C t^{-2/3}, the solution of the focusing NLS initial-value problem with nonzero boundary conditions admits the expansion q(x,t) = q_- e^{2i g_∞} + t^{-1/3} q_p(x,t) + O(t^{-2/3} log t), where the correction q_p is expressed in terms of the tritronquée solution Q(y) of the inhomogeneous Painlevé-II equation (1.5)–(1.6) with Stokes parameter ν determined by the reflection coefficient at k_c = -q_o/√2.

Load-bearing premise

The initial perturbation must decay exponentially, the scattering coefficient a(k) must have no zeros on the continuous spectrum, and the reflection coefficient must be nonzero at the critical point; if any of these fails the local model changes character.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives the long-time asymptotics of the focusing NLS equation with nonzero boundary conditions in the double-scaling transition layers |x/t ± 4√2 q_o| ≤ C t^{-2/3} that separate the plane-wave and modulated elliptic-wave regions of Biondini–Mantzavinos. Under the exponential-decay condition (1.4), Assumption 2.1 (no zeros of a on the continuous spectrum), and r(k_c) ≠ 0, Theorem 1.1 states that the solution remains a plane wave to leading order, with a first correction of order t^{-1/3} whose coefficient is built from a distinguished tritronquée solution Q(y) of the inhomogeneous Painlevé-II equation (1.5)–(1.6). The argument proceeds by four exact contour deformations of the IST Riemann–Hilbert problem, construction of an outer parametrix that absorbs the branch-cut jump and a local parametrix reduced to Miller’s RH problem for the tritronquée, followed by a small-norm error problem and reconstruction of the potential.

Significance. The result completes the asymptotic description of the nonlinear stage of modulational instability for generic localized perturbations of a constant background by supplying the missing uniform transition formulae. The appearance of the same inhomogeneous Painlevé-II tritronquée that governs the far-field of rogue waves of infinite order is of independent interest and places the focusing NZBC problem in a broader Painlevé hierarchy. The derivation is parameter-free once the reflection coefficient is given: ν is read off r(k_c) and the phase g_∞ is determined by an explicit integral. The technical machinery (matching estimates, reduction to Miller’s model, L^1/L^∞ control of the error jumps) is standard but carefully executed, and the paper therefore supplies a usable, self-contained reference for future work on vector focusing systems and related NZBC problems.

minor comments (5)
  1. In the statement of Theorem 1.1 the factor (8√6/(9 q_o))^{1/3} multiplies both the correction term and the definition of y; a short parenthetical remark that this is the natural cubic scaling of the phase would help the reader track the constants through Sections 3–4.
  2. Figure 3 shows the sign chart of Re(i heta) for three values of ξ, but the contours actually used in the lens openings of Figures 4–8 are not overlaid. Adding the deformed contours to one of the panels would make the relation between the phase and the jumps more immediate.
  3. The reduction of both local models (P− and P+) to the same Jimbo–Miwa RH problem is stated after (A.2), but the verification that G(z) contributes only exponentially small terms is left implicit. A one-sentence reference to the decay of the cubic phase on the rays of Figure 10 would close the argument.
  4. Several recent works on Painlevé transitions for defocusing or step-like NLS (e.g., Wang–Fan 2023, Boutet de Monvel–Lenells–Shepelsky 2025) are cited only in the concluding remarks; a brief comparison already in the introduction would better situate the inhomogeneous versus homogeneous Painlevé-II distinction.
  5. Typographical: the arXiv identifier in the header is 2606.29156v2; the year 2026 is presumably a placeholder and should be corrected before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Theorem 1.1 is a standard Deift–Zhou double-scaling analysis resting on external IST and Miller’s tritronquée theory.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and non-circular. The RH formulation and plane-wave/elliptic asymptotics are taken from Biondini–Kovačič and Biondini–Mantzavinos (external); the local model is reduced by exact contour deformations and scaling (3.15) to Miller’s Jimbo–Miwa RH problem for the inhomogeneous Painlevé-II tritronquée (Appendix A, citing [5]), whose existence, uniqueness, and large-z expansion are imported as independent mathematical facts, not as prior results of the present authors. The outer parametrix, matching estimates (Lemmas 3.1, 4.3), small-norm error problem, and reconstruction of E^{(1)}_{12} are carried out explicitly in the paper; ν is read off the reflection coefficient of the given initial data, not fitted. The sole self-reference ([44], “in preparation”) appears only in the concluding remarks as motivation for future vector work and is not used in the proof of Theorem 1.1. No step reduces the claimed t^{-1/3} correction to its own inputs by definition or by a load-bearing self-citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper rests on the established IST/RH formulation for focusing NLS with NZBCs, the Deift–Zhou method, and Miller’s theory of tritronquée solutions. No free parameters are fitted; the only spectral assumptions are those needed to keep the continuous spectrum free of zeros and the local model non-degenerate. No new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The inverse-scattering transform and the associated 2×2 RH problem for focusing NLS with NZBCs are well-posed under the exponential-decay condition (1.4) (Biondini–Kovačič, Biondini–Mantzavinos).
    Invoked throughout Section 2; the whole asymptotic analysis starts from this RH problem.
  • domain assumption Assumption 2.1: a(k) ≠ 0 on C- ∪ Σ (no discrete spectrum on the continuous spectrum).
    Stated explicitly; guarantees that M is analytic off Σ and that the jump matrices are as written.
  • standard math Existence, uniqueness and large-argument asymptotics of the increasing tritronquée solution of the inhomogeneous Painlevé-II equation (Miller, SIGMA 2018).
    Appendix A reduces the local model to Miller’s RH problem and quotes the connection formulae used for V(y) and ˆV(y).
  • ad hoc to paper r(k_c) ≠ 0 (Remark 1.2), ensuring the Painlevé region is non-degenerate.
    Needed so that ν is well-defined and the local jump is non-trivial; excluded by the authors as a separate case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Tritronqu\'ee Painlev\'e II asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PIKUAQZP

@misc{pith2026260629156,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Tritronqu\'ee Painlev\'e II asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PIKUAQZP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.29156}
}
abstract

We study the long-time asymptotics of the focusing nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions in the transition regions between the plane-wave and modulated elliptic-wave regimes. Biondini and Mantzavinos showed that, away from the transition curves \(x=\pm 4\sqrt{2}\,q_o t\), the \((x,t)\)-half-plane decomposes, to leading order, into two plane-wave regions and a central region described by slowly modulated elliptic oscillations. However, their asymptotic formulae are not uniform near the boundaries separating these regions. The purpose of this paper is to resolve this missing boundary layer. Using a double-scaling nonlinear steepest descent analysis of the associated Riemann--Hilbert problem, we show that the leading term in each transition region is still a plane wave, while the first nontrivial correction is of order \(t^{-1/3}\). The coefficient of this correction is expressed in terms of a distinguished tritronqu\'ee solution of an inhomogeneous Painlev\'e-II equation. This Painlev\'e-II tritronqu\'ee structure is also known to appear in the asymptotic analysis of rogue waves of infinite order.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29156 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The countor Σ = R ∪ B. Assumption 2.1. Assume that a(k) ̸= 0, k ∈ C− ∪ Σ, where Σ = R ∪ B. Under Assumption 2.1, it was shown in [6] that M(x, t, k) is analytic for k ∈ C \ Σ and has jumps across Σ. More precisely, M satisfies the following Riemann–Hilbert problem: M+(x, t, k) = M−(x, t, k)V1(x, t, k), k ∈ R, (2.12a) M+(x, t, k) = M−(x, t, k)V2(x, t, k), k ∈ B +, (2.12b) M+(x, t, k) = M−(x, t, k)V3(x, t, k), k ∈ B −… view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. The space-time regions for the focusing NLS equation. The two solid rays correspond [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Sign structure of ℜ(iθ) for ξ = −∞, ξ ∈ (−∞, ξc), and ξ = ξc, respectively. The gray regions indicate ℜ(iθ) < 0, while the white regions indicate ℜ(iθ) > 0. The x-part of the Lax pair (2.1), together with the definition of M in (2.11) and the nor￾malization condition, yields the solution of the IVP (1.2) through the reconstruction formula q(x, t) = −2i lim k→∞ kM12(x, t, k). (2.15) Therefore, the long-time asymptoti… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Schematic illustration of the jump contour Σ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Jump contour Σ(2) for M(2) . On (−∞, k1), V (1)(k) = V (1) 0 . Moreover, on the remaining part of the real axis we have V (1) 5 (k) = V1(k). Second deformation. The second transformation is designed to remove the jump on (−∞, k1). Define the scalar function δ by δ+(k) …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The contour Σϵ = S5 j=1 Σ ϵ j . Set Mf = M(4)Y, k ∈ Dϵ. Then the jump matrix of Mf is Ve = Y −1V (4)Y. The purpose of this conjugation is to remove the constant phase and amplitude factors in the local jumps. Define Σϵ = ∪ 5 j=1Σ ϵ j , where Σϵ j = Σ(4) j ∩Dϵ; see [PI…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The jump contour Σ (2) for M(2) . Let V (2) denote the corresponding jump matrix. With this transformation, the jump on (−∞, k1) is removed. The new jump contour is shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Schematic illustration of the contour ΣX (left) and the regions {RX j } 2 j=1 (right). where G(z) =      1 − r0 1 + r 2 0 e iΦ(z,y) 0 1   , z ∈ RX 1 ,   1 0 r0 1 + r 2 0 e −iΦ(z,y) 1   , z ∈ RX 2 , I, z /∈ RX 1 ∪ RX 2 . The regions {R…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The contour Σ ϵ = S5 j=1 Σ ϵ j . Lemma 3.1. For each (x, t), the function Mloc(x, t, k) defined in (3.19) is analytic and bounded for k ∈ Dϵ \ Σ ϵ . Across Σ ϵ , it satisfies Mloc + (x, t, k) = Mloc − (x, t, k)V loc(x, t, k). Moreover, for sufficiently large t,    ∥…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The jump matrices and jump contour for W(z; y). This function can be described in terms of a special solution of an inhomogeneous Painlev´e-II equation. More precisely, there exists a unique tritronqu´ee solution Q(y) of d 2Q dy2 + 2 3 yQ − 2Q 3 − 2 3 ip − 1 3 = 0, whi…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The jump contour for M(4) . 4 Long–time asymptotics in the transition region P+ The boundary transition analysis from the modulated elliptic-wave side differs substantially from the analysis in the interior of the elliptic-wave region. In [6, Section 5], a G-function t…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: The local contour Σ ϵ = ∪ 4 j=1Σ ϵ j . case (x, t) ∈ P−. Let Dϵ be the open disk of radius ϵ centered at kc. Define Σ ϵ = [ 4 j=1 Σ ϵ j , Σ ϵ j = Σ(4) j ∩ Dϵ, see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The local contour Σ X. Left: the case (x, t) ∈ P−. Right: the case (x, t) ∈ P+. In this appendix we formulate the local Painlevé-II model problems used in Sections 3 and 4. The two subregions P− and P+ give rise to slightly different local contours. Nevertheless, both …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic illustration of the gray regions corresponding to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The jump matrices and jump contour for W(z; y). RH Problem A.2 (Jimbo–Miwa Painlevé-II problem). Let y, p, τ ∈ C be related by τ 2 = e 2πp−1. Seek a 2 × 2 matrix-valued function W(z; y) = W(z; y, p, τ ) with the following properties. Analyticity. The matrix W(z; y) is…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. J. Ablowitz, B. Prinari, and A. D. Trubatch,Discrete and Continuous Nonlinear Schrödinger Systems, London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Ser., vol. 302, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004

    2004

  2. [2]

    M. J. Ablowitz and H. Segur,Solitons and the Inverse Scattering Transform, SIAM Stud. Appl. Math., vol. 4, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, 1981

    1981

  3. [3]

    Infeld and G

    E. Infeld and G. Rowlands,Nonlinear Waves, Solitons and Chaos, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000

    2000

  4. [4]

    Sulem and P.-L

    C. Sulem and P.-L. Sulem,The Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation: Self-Focusing and Wave Collapse, Appl. Math. Sci., vol. 139, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999

    1999

  5. [5]

    P. D. Miller, On the increasing tritronquée solutions of the Painlevé-II equation,SIGMA Symmetry Integrability Geom. Methods Appl.14(2018), Paper No. 125, 38 pp

    2018

  6. [6]

    Biondini and D

    G. Biondini and D. Mantzavinos, Long-time asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions at infinity and asymptotic stage of modulational instability,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.70(2017), no. 12, 2300–2365

    2017

  7. [7]

    Biondini, S

    G. Biondini, S. Li, and D. Mantzavinos, Long-time asymptotics for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions in the presence of a discrete spectrum,Comm. Math. Phys.382(2021), no. 3, 1495–1577

    2021

  8. [8]

    T. B. Benjamin, Instability of periodic wavetrains in nonlinear dispersive systems,Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. A299(1967), no. 1456, 59–75

    1967

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    T. B. Benjamin and J. E. Feir, The disintegration of wave trains on deep water. Part 1. Theory,J. Fluid Mech.27(1967), no. 3, 417–430

    1967

  2. [10]

    M. A. Alejo, L. Fanelli, and C. Muñoz, The Akhmediev breather is unstable,São Paulo J. Math. Sci.13(2019), no. 2, 391–401, doi:10.1007/s40863-019-00145-4

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    M. A. Alejo, L. Fanelli, and C. Muñoz, Review on the stability of the Peregrine and related breathers,Front. Phys.8(2020), 591995, doi:10.3389/fphy.2020.591995

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    Zakharov and L.A

    V.E. Zakharov and L.A. Ostrovsky, Modulation instability: the beginning, Phys. D.238 (2009), 540–548. 28

    2009

  5. [13]

    Biondini and E

    G. Biondini and E. Fagerstrom, The integrable nature of modulational instability,SIAM J. Appl. Math.75(2015), 136–163

    2015

  6. [14]

    Biondini, S

    G. Biondini, S. Li, D. Mantzavinos, and S. Trillo, Universal behavior of modulationally unstable media,SIAM Rev.60(2018), 888–908

    2018

  7. [15]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media,Soviet Phys. JETP34(1972), no. 1, 62–69

    1972

  8. [16]

    Deift and X

    P. Deift and X. Zhou, A steepest descent method for oscillatory Riemann–Hilbert problems. Asymptotics for the mKdV equation,Ann. of Math. (2)137(1993), no. 2, 295–368

    1993

  9. [17]

    Biondini and G

    G. Biondini and G. Kovačič, Inverse scattering transform for the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions,J. Math. Phys.55(2014), no. 3, 031506, 24 pp

    2014

  10. [18]

    Muñoz, Instability in nonlinear Schrödinger breathers,Proyecciones36(2017), no

    C. Muñoz, Instability in nonlinear Schrödinger breathers,Proyecciones36(2017), no. 4, 653–683

    2017

  11. [19]

    Boutet de Monvel, J

    A. Boutet de Monvel, J. Lenells, and D. Shepelsky, The focusing NLS equation with step-like oscillating background: asymptotics in a transition zone,J. Differential Equations429 (2025), 747–801

    2025

  12. [20]

    G. Li, L. Liu, and Y. Yang, Complex Painlevé type transient asymptotics of the focusing NLS equation: step-like oscillating background,J. Differential Equations465(2026), Paper No. 114216, 35 pp

    2026

  13. [21]

    Bilman, L

    D. Bilman, L. Ling, and P. D. Miller, Extreme superposition: rogue waves of infinite order and the Painlevé-III hierarchy,Duke Math. J.169(2020), no. 4, 671–760

    2020

  14. [22]

    Bilman and P

    D. Bilman and P. D. Miller,Extreme Superposition: High-Order Fundamental Rogue Waves in the Far-Field Regime,Mem. Amer. Math. Soc.300(2024), no. 1505, v+90 pp

    2024

  15. [23]

    Boutet de Monvel, V

    A. Boutet de Monvel, V. P. Kotlyarov, and D. Shepelsky, Focusing NLS equation: long-time dynamics of step-like initial data,Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN2011(2011), no. 7, 1613–1653

    2011

  16. [24]

    Charlier and J

    C. Charlier and J. Lenells, Airy and Painlevé asymptotics for the mKdV equation,J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2)101(2020), no. 1, 194–225

    2020

  17. [25]

    Borghese, R

    M. Borghese, R. Jenkins, and K. D. T.-R. McLaughlin, Long time asymptotic behavior of the focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation,Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré C Anal. Non Linéaire 35(2018), no. 4, 887–920

    2018

  18. [26]

    Deift and X

    P. Deift and X. Zhou, Long-time asymptotics for solutions of the NLS equation with initial data in a weighted Sobolev space,Comm. Pure Appl. Math.56(2003), no. 8, 1029–1077

    2003

  19. [27]

    Boutet de Monvel, A

    A. Boutet de Monvel, A. R. Its, and D. Shepelsky, Painlevé-type asymptotics for the Camassa–Holm equation,SIAM J. Math. Anal.42(2010), no. 4, 1854–1873

    2010

  20. [28]

    Wang and E

    Z. Wang and E. Fan, The defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a nonzero background: Painlevé asymptotics in two transition regions,Comm. Math. Phys.402 (2023), no. 3, 2879–2930

    2023

  21. [29]

    Cuccagna and R

    S. Cuccagna and R. Jenkins, On the asymptotic stability ofN-soliton solutions of the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation,Comm. Math. Phys.343(2016), no. 3, 921–969. 29

    2016

  22. [30]

    Charlier and J

    C. Charlier and J. Lenells, On Boussinesq’s equation for water waves, preprint, arXiv:2204.02365

    arXiv

  23. [31]

    D.-S. Wang, D. Zhu, and X. Zhu, Genus two KdV soliton gases and their long-time asymptotics,Forum Math. Sigma14(2026), Paper No. e57, 47 pp

    2026

  24. [32]

    Huang, D.-S

    L. Huang, D.-S. Wang, and X. Zhu, Long-time asymptotics of the Tzitzéica equation on the line,Math. Ann.395(2026), no. 1, Paper No. 18

    2026

  25. [33]

    Yang, S.-F

    J.-J. Yang, S.-F. Tian, and Z.-Q. Li, The modified Camassa–Holm equation with nonzero background: soliton resolution conjecture and asymptotic stability ofN-soliton solutions, Adv. Math.484(2026), Paper No. 110552

    2026

  26. [34]

    E. Fan, G. Li, Y. Yang, and L. Zhang, Painlevé XXXIV asymptotics for the defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with a finite-genus algebro-geometric background,Math. Ann.394(2026), Paper No. 44, 58 pp

    2026

  27. [35]

    Charlier, J

    C. Charlier, J. Lenells, and D.-S. Wang, The “good” Boussinesq equation: long-time asymptotics,Anal. PDE16(2023), no. 6, 1351–1388

    2023

  28. [36]

    Charlier and J

    C. Charlier and J. Lenells, The soliton resolution conjecture for the Boussinesq equation,J. Math. Pures Appl. (9)191(2024), Paper No. 103621

    2024

  29. [37]

    Deift, T

    P. Deift, T. Kriecherbauer, K. T.-R. McLaughlin, S. Venakides, and X. Zhou, Uniform asymptotics for polynomials orthogonal with respect to varying exponential weights and applications to universality questions in random matrix theory,Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 52(1999), no. 11, 1335–1425

    1999

  30. [38]

    Deift,Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann–Hilbert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol

    P. Deift,Orthogonal Polynomials and Random Matrices: A Riemann–Hilbert Approach, Courant Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 3, New York University, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York; American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1999

    1999

  31. [39]

    Lenells, Matrix Riemann–Hilbert problems with jumps across Carleson contours,Monatsh

    J. Lenells, Matrix Riemann–Hilbert problems with jumps across Carleson contours,Monatsh. Math.186(2018), no. 1, 111–152

    2018

  32. [40]

    Lenells, The nonlinear steepest descent method for Riemann–Hilbert problems of low regularity,Indiana Univ

    J. Lenells, The nonlinear steepest descent method for Riemann–Hilbert problems of low regularity,Indiana Univ. Math. J.66(2017), no. 4, 1287–1332

    2017

  33. [41]

    Kraus, G

    D. Kraus, G. Biondini, and G. Kovačič, The focusing Manakov system with nonzero boundary conditions,Nonlinearity28(2015), no. 9, 3101–3151

    2015

  34. [42]

    Prinari, Inverse scattering transform for nonlinear Schrödinger systems on a nontrivial background: a survey of classical results, new developments and future directions,J

    B. Prinari, Inverse scattering transform for nonlinear Schrödinger systems on a nontrivial background: a survey of classical results, new developments and future directions,J. Nonlinear Math. Phys.30(2023), no. 2, 317–383

    2023

  35. [43]

    H. Liu, J. Shen, and X. G. Geng, Inverse scattering transformation for theN-component focusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation with nonzero boundary conditions,Lett. Math. Phys.113(2023), no. 1, Paper No. 23, 47 pp

    2023

  36. [44]

    X. G. Geng and H. B. Zhang, Long-time asymptotics for the focusing Manakov system with nonzero boundary conditions, in preparation. 30

Pith tools

Reviewed July 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.